Targeting the renin−angiotensin signaling pathway in COVID-19: Unanswered questions,opportunities, and challenges

The role of the renin−angiotensin signaling (RAS) pathway in COVID-19 has received much attention. A central mechanism for COVID-19 pathophysiology has been proposed: imbalance of angiotensin converting enzymes (ACE)1 and ACE2 (ACE2 being the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2] virus “receptor”) that results in tissue injury from angiotensin II (Ang II)-mediated signaling. This mechanism provides a rationale for multiple therapeutic approaches. In parallel, clinical data from retrospective analysis of COVID-19 cohorts has revealed that ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may be beneficial in COVID-19. These findings have led to the initiation of clinical trials using approved drugs that target the generation (ACEIs) and actions (ARBs) of Ang II. However, treatment of COVID-19 with ACEIs/ARBs poses several challenges. These include choosing appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria, dose optimization, risk of adverse effects and drug interactions, and verification of target engagement. Other approaches related to the RAS pathway might be considered, for example, inhalational administration of ACEIs/ARBs (to deliver drugs directly to the lungs) and use of compounds with other actions (e.g., activation of ACE2, agonism of MAS1 receptors, β-arrestin−based Angiotensin receptor agonists, and administration of soluble ACE2 or ACE2 peptides). Studies with animal models could test such approaches and assess therapeutic benefit. This Perspective highlights questions whose answers could advance RAS-targeting agents as mechanism-driven ways to blunt tissue injury, morbidity, and mortality of COVID-19.     

Renin-angiotensin system inhibition prevents type 2 diabetes mellitus. Part 2. Overview of physiological and biochemical mechanisms

The inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with either angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or AT1 angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) consistently and significantly reduces the incidence of type 2 diabetes in patients with hypertension or congestive heart failure. The mechanisms underlying this protective effect appear to be complex and may involve an improvement of both insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion. These two effects may result, at least in part, from the well known effects of these pharmacological agents on the vascular system on the one hand, on the ionic balance on the other hand. Indeed, the vasodilation induced by ACEIs or ARBs could improve the blood circulation in skeletal muscles, thus favouring peripheral insulin action, but also in the pancreas, thus promoting insulin secretion. Preserving cellular potassium and magnesium pools by blocking the aldosterone effects could also improve both cellular insulin action and insulin secretion. However, besides these classical effects, new mechanisms have been recently suggested. A direct effect of the inhibition of angiotensin and/or of the enhancement of bradykinin on various steps of the insulin cascade signalling has been described as well an increase in GLUT4 glucose transporters after RAS inhibition. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that angiotensin II inhibits adipogenic differentiation of human adipocytes via A1 receptors and, therefore, it has been hypothesised that RAS blockade may prevent diabetes by promoting the recruitment and differentiation of adipocytes. Finally, some lipophilic ARBs appear to induce PPAR-gamma activity in the adipose tissue. Hence, the protection against type 2 diabetes observed after RAS inhibition may be partially linked to a thiazolidinedione-like effect. In conclusion, numerous physiological and biochemical mechanisms could explain the protective effect of RAS inhibition against the development of type 2 diabetes in individuals with arterial hypertension or congestive heart failure. What might be the main mechanism in the overall protection effect of ACEIs or ARBs remains an open question.     

Angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor blockers and renal function.

Blood pressure reduction is the most significant factor in delaying onset and progression of renal disease. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) delays renal disease progression. More recently, agents that block the RAS by preventing angiotensin II from binding to its subtype 1 receptor (ARBs) have been developed in an effort to prevent deleterious consequences of pathologic levels of angiotensin II and to reduce the adverse effects of RAS blockade associated with ACEIs. Human studies with a variety of ARBs have clearly demonstrated the antihypertensive and antiproteinuric efficacy of these agents in patients with progressive renal diseases. Moreover, the effects of ARBs are similar or identical to those of ACEIs. Ongoing long-term clinical trials are designed to determine whether ARBs also preserve renal function similar to ACEIs. Specifically, the role of ARBs in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes is being evaluated in 3 large trials, including Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes-Part 2 With Valsartan, the Losartan Renal Protection Study, and the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial. Definitive evidence of the long-term protective effects of ARBs in chronic progressive renal disease is expected from these important studies.     

Angiotensin receptor blockers: evidence for preserving target organs

Hypertension is a major problem throughout the developed world. Although current antihypertensive treatment regimens reduce morbidity and mortality, patients are often noncompliant, and medications may not completely normalize blood pressure. As a result, current therapy frequently does not prevent or reverse the cardiovascular remodeling that often occurs when blood pressure is chronically elevated. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is effective in controlling hypertension and treating congestive heart failure. Both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) inhibit the activity of the RAS, but these two classes of antihypertensive medications have different mechanisms of action and different pharmacologic profiles. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors block a single pathway in the production of angiotensin II (Ang II). In addition, angiotensin I is not the only substrate for ACE. The ACE inhibitors also block the degradation of bradykinin that may have potential benefits in cardiovascular disease. Bradykinin is, however, the presumed cause of cough associated with ACE inhibitor therapy. Data from clinical trials on ACE inhibitors serve to support the involvement of the RAS in the development of cardiovascular disease. Angiotensin receptor blockers act distally in the RAS to block the Ang II type 1 (AT1) receptor selectively. Thus, ARBs are more specific agents and avoid many side effects. Experimental and clinical trials have documented the efficacy of ARBs in preserving target-organ function and reversing cardiovascular remodeling. In some instances, maximal benefit may be obtained with Ang II blockade using both ARBs and ACE inhibitors. This review describes clinical trials that document the efficacy of ARBs in protecting the myocardium, blood vessels, and renal vasculature.     

Long‐Term Antiproteinuric Effect of Dual Renin–Angiotensin System Blockade

We evaluated the long‐term changes on overt proteinuria induced by dual blockade of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS). Dual blockade was produced by adding an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) to treatment with maximal recommended doses of an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor in proteinuric patients. A total of 28 patients (19 men and 9 women) with proteinuria higher than 1 g/24 h were enrolled in this trial of treatment with the ARB candesartan (from 4 up to 32 mg daily) added to existing treatment with an ACE inhibitor. At 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, we evaluated proteinuria in 24‐h urinary collections, office blood pressure (BP), plasmatic creatinine (Cr), serum potassium (K), and 24 h urine collection creatinine clearance (CrC). During monoblockade of the RAS by ACE inhibitor treatment, albuminuria was 2.94 ± 1.92 mg/24 h; BP was 137/76 mmHg; K+ was 4.8 ± 0.5 mmol/l, Cr was 1.76 ± 0.67 mg/dL, and CrC was 62 ± 31.9 mL/min. After 6 months, dual blockade of the RAS albuminuria was 2.18 ± 2.29 mg/24 h (P < 0.01 vs. baseline) and BP was 133/75 mmHg (not significant). At 36 months, albuminuria was 2.21 ± 2.20 mg/24 h (P < 0.05 vs. baseline); BP was 133/73 mmHg (not significant). CrC was not changed along the follow up. A small increment of Cr was detected at 24 months (2.11 ± 1.06 mg/mL, P < 0.05). The antiproteinuric effect of dual renin–angiotensin system blockade combining candesartan and ACE inhibitors remain after 36 months without losing its initial effect. Blood pressure changes seem not to explain this long‐term antiproteinuric effect.     

Rationale for the use of angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (part I of II)

Almost 5 million individuals in the United States are diagnosed with chronic heart failure (HF), and the prevalence is increasing. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta blockers, neurohormonal antagonists that block the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the sympathetic nervous system, respectively, have been shown in clinical trials to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with HF, and these therapies are now integral components of standard HF treatment. Yet, morbidity and mortality rates in HF remain unacceptably high, and the limitations of current standard therapies are becoming increasingly apparent. About 10% of patients with HF are unable to tolerate ACE inhibitors, often because of cough. In addition, ACE inhibition may not completely block the RAS because angiotensin II, the main end product of the RAS, can be generated via non-ACE enzymatic pathways. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) may exert more complete RAS blockade than ACE inhibitors by interfering with the binding of angiotensin II at the receptor level, regardless of the enzymatic pathway of production. They are also better tolerated than ACE inhibitors and have been shown to improve symptoms and function in clinical trials in patients with HF. These factors provide a strong rationale for the study of the clinical effects of ARBs in patients with HF.     

Anti-diabetic effect of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system

Diabetes, which is frequently associated with hypertension, accelerates the development of hypertension-induced cardiovascular disease. Thus, the prevention of diabetes is important in the management of hypertension. Recent clinical megastudies have suggested that the blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) inhibits new onset of diabetes. Thus, the agents to inhibit the RAS should be beneficial for glucose metabolism. However, the cardiovascular protective effects of ACE inhibitors and ARBs are not always superior to other classes of drugs. Further long-term clinical trials are necessary to clarify the anti-diabetic effect of the RAS-inhibiting agents.     

Comparative risk of new‐onset diabetes mellitus for antihypertensive drugs in elderly: A Bayesian network meta‐analysis

There is no study to compare different class of antihypertensive drugs on new‐onset diabetes mellitus (NOD) in elderly. We aimed to investigate the risk of antihypertensive drugs on NOD in elderly patients. The databases were retrieved in an orderly manner from the dates of their establishment to October, 2018, including Medline, Embase, Clinical Trials, and the Cochrane Database, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of different antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients (age > 60 years). Then, a network meta‐analysis was conducted using R and Stata 12.0 softwares. A total of 14 RCTs involving 74 042 patients were included. The relative risk of NOD mellitus associated with six classes of antihypertensive drugs was analyzed, including placebo, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), diuretics, and β blockers. Patients with ACEIs or ARBs appeared to have significantly reduced risk of NOD compare with placebo: ACEIs (OR = 0.49, 95% CrI 0.28‐0.85), ARBs (OR = 0.37, 95% CrI 0.26‐0.52), while CCBs, diuretics, and β blockers appeared to have not significantly reduced risk of NOD mellitus compare with placebo: CCBs (OR = 1.10, 95% CrI 0.85‐1.60), diuretics (OR = 1.40, 95% CrI 0.92‐2.50), β blockers (OR = 1.40, 95% CrI 0.93‐2.10). The SUCRA of placebo, ACEIs, ARBs, CCBs, diuretics, and β blockers was, respectively, 65.3%, 69.3%, 92.3%, 44.1%, 12.1%, and 16.5%. According to the evidence, ARBs have an advantage over the other treatments in reducing the risk of NOD in elderly patients.     

Role of angiotensin II in the development of nephropathy and podocytopathy of diabetes

Diabetic kidney disease is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease worldwide. Podocytes are highly differentiated, pericyte-like cells that are essential for normal function of the kidney filter. Loss of podocytes is a hallmark of progressive kidney diseases including diabetic nephropathy. Podocytes are a direct target for angiotensin II - mediated injury by altered expression and distribution of podocyte proteins. Additionally, angiotensin II promotes podocyte injury indirectly by increasing calcium influx and production of reactive oxygen species. Notwithstanding the convincing rationale for angiotensin II blockade as a treatment modality, the incidence of diabetes-related end stage renal disease has increased steadily despite widespread use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). Recently published clinical trials have rekindled a debate on the safety and efficacy of dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). This review summarizes the rationale for blockade of angiotensin II as a therapeutic target in treating diabetic kidney disease, including the critical role played by podocytes. Recent relevant clinical trials on the role of RAS blockade in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease are discussed.     

Modulating atherosclerosis through inhibition or blockade of angiotensin

Angiotensin-convertng enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are well recognized for their benefits in treating hypertension and congestive heart failure and preventing postmyocardial infarction heart failure or left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Recently, blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor was shown to reduce cardiovascular events in hypertensive subjects with LV hypertrophy. Several lines of evidence are now converging to show that ACE inhibitors may affect the atherosclerotic process itself. Emerging clinical data indicate that angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) may possibly modulate atherosclerosis as well. The antiatherogenic properties of ACE inhibitors and ARBs may derive from inhibition or blockade of angiotensin II, now recognized as an agent that increases oxidative stress.Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin-receptor blockade also increase endothelial nitric oxide formation, which improves endothelial function. In contrast to the effects of ARBs, the vascular effects of ACE inhibitors may, in part, be mediated by an increase in bradykinin. This article reviews some of the biologic mechanisms whereby ACE inhibitors and ARBs may modulate atherosclerosis.     

Pathways of hepatic and renal damage through non‐classical activation of the renin‐angiotensin system in chronic liver disease

In liver cirrhosis, renin‐angiotensin system (RAS) activation sustains renal sodium retention and hepatic fibrogenesis. New information has recently enlivened the traditional concept of RAS. For instance, renin and prorenin bind their ubiquitous receptors, resulting in the local production of angiotensin (Ang) II; increased serum calcium and calcimimetic agents, through stimulation of extracellular calcium‐sensing receptors (CaSR), blunt renin production and lead to natriuretic effects in human and experimental cirrhosis. Alongside systemic production, there is Ang II tissue production within various organs through RAS enzymes different from angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE), that is chymase, tissue plasminogen activator and several cathepsins. In experimental cirrhosis, inhibition of chymase leads to natriuretic and hepatic antifibrotic effects, without changes in systemic haemodynamics. In the kidney, local RAS coordinates proximal and distal tubular sodium reabsorption. However, renalase, whose plasma and tissue levels are severely altered in experimental cirrhosis, degrades systemic and renal tubule catecholamines, antagonizing the effects of renal RAS. Angiotensinogen‐derived natriuretic and vasodilating peptides (Ang1‐9, Ang1‐7, Ang3‐8) and their receptors have been described. Receptor agonists or antagonists are available to affect portal hypertension and sodium retention in cirrhosis. ACE2‐dependent generation of Ang1‐7 may inhibit experimental liver fibrosis. inhibition of Ang1‐7 clearance by means of neprilysin blockade has portal hypotensive and natriuretic effects. Ang1‐12, whose production renin does not regulate, is converted to several different angiotensin peptides via chymase. Finally, Ang II behaves as either an antinatriuretic or a natriuretic agent, based on the tissue content of AT₁R and AT₂R receptors, their ratio being prone to pharmacological modulation.     

Angiotensin II blockade: a therapeutic strategy with wide applications

Evidence now exists suggesting a pathologic role for angiotensin II in patients with cardiovascular disease and those with risk factors. Clinical trials such as the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study (LIFE), the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study (HOPE), the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK), and the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study have clearly demonstrated that blood pressure reduction is important in hypertension and diabetes. If this can be accomplished with agents that block the renin-angiotensin system, then additional clinical benefit will be achieved. Clinical data on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are well established, while emerging data on the use of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) continue to grow. There is evidence supporting the concept of angiotensin II escape in the presence of ACEIs. The question that remains to be answered is whether a combination of both agents (ACEIs and ARBs) can improve clinical outcomes. Ongoing clinical trials will answer this question.     

Treating patients for cardiovascular protection: combination therapy to achieve complete renin-angiotensin system blockade

Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) is a proven antihypertensive strategy. Understanding of the pathophysiologic effects of chronic RAS activation and clinical data indicate that RAS inhibition may exert beneficial effects in addition to blood pressure reduction. Studies indicate that monotherapy with ACE inhibitors and ARBs slows progression of diabetic and non-diabetic renal disease. Vascular protective effects of RAS inhibition have also been demonstrated in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events in the absence of significant blood pressure elevation or left ventricular dysfunction. Combining the complementary effects of ACE inhibitors and ARBs to achieve more complete RAS blockade is a promising approach to further reducing cardiovascular risk. This review will present the rationale for dual RAS inhibition, clinical data relating to its efficacy, and ongoing studies designed to evaluate its utility in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events.     

Saga of Renin‐Angiotensin System and Calcium Channels in Hypertensive Diabetics: Does it Have a Therapeutic Edge?

Current understanding of the genesis of diabetic vascular disease suggests that vascular complications, such as atherosclerosis and hypertension, are associated with changes in structural and functional parameters. Experimental and epidemiological data suggest that activation of the renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system plays an important role in the development of micro‐ and macro‐vascular complications. Most of the negative cardiovascular actions of angiotensin II are mediated through AT₁ receptors, whereas the AT₂ receptors mediate largely beneficial effects. Hence, compared to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), selective AT₁ receptor blockers (ARBs) should provide additional end organ protection via AT₂ receptors activation. Although ACEIs are useful therapeutically, they are being currently displaced by ARBs. Enhanced calcium ion channel activity is reported in vascular smooth muscles from diabetic animal models. Clinical benefits of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in diabetic hypertensive patients are controversial, but there is increasing experimental evidence for the beneficial effects of dihydropyridine‐type CCBs. Although the treatment of hypertension in diabetics reduces cardiovascular and microvascular complications, the ideal strategy for treating hypertension in diabetics has not been well defined and warrants a combination approach. Only limited clinical data regarding the use of ARBs in combination with CCBs in diabetics are available. The experimental data suggest that combination of a CCB and an AT₁ receptor blocker, or a hypothetical dual blocker of AT₁ receptors as well as of calcium channels would be an ideal regimen. There is, however, no conclusive clinical evidence to support the combined use of these drugs. This review highlights the available experimental data that support the therapeutic benefits of this combination.     

Clinical experience with angiotensin receptor blockers with particular reference to valsartan

The angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), are highly selective for the AT1 subtype and will block the effects of angiotensin II on peripheral vessels. Several short- and long-term studies have shown these agents to be safe and effective antihypertensive drugs. Since monotherapy of hypertension may be ineffective in lowering the blood pressure to goal, the use of an ARB, especially in combination with a diuretic or another medication, is frequently necessary to bring the blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg (<130/80 mm Hg among people with diabetes mellitus or chronic renal failure), according to JNC 7 guidelines. Besides hypertension, the ARBs have been shown to reduce left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients. Other benefits of these medications, as well as the angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), include a decrease in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure, or hypertensive diabetic nephropathy with proteinuria. Some of the beneficial effects noted with the ACEIs and ARBs (congestive heart failure, left ventricular hypertrophy), have also been demonstrated with the use of b blockers alone and in combination with a diuretic. These drugs, i.e., b blockers, ARBs, and ACEIs, seem to exert their beneficial action through the blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. The role of this system in cardiovascular remodeling and its blockade will be discussed in this review, which will specifically summarize data with the ARB, valsartan.     

Angiotensin receptor blockers in congestive heart failure: evidence, concerns, and controversies

Heart failure results in neurohormonal activation of which the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) is the main mediator. Activation of this system leads to the production of angiotensin II (ATII), which leads to multiple adverse short-term and long-term effects, including hemodynamic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, inflammation, and cardiac remodeling. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) exert favorable effects in congestive heart failure (CHF) by inhibiting the production of ATII. It has been shown that ACEIs may not be able to suppress the production of ATII completely because there are RAS-independent mechanisms of ATII production. Hence, it was thought that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) might be more useful in CHF because they directly block the ATII receptors. Many studies have been done to evaluate the role of ARBs in CHF. We reviewed these studies and have attempted to define the place and ARBs in the therapy for CHF.     

Reporting on sex-based analysis in clinical trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker efficacy

BACKGROUND:

Clinical practice recommendations for hypertension do not make recommendations specific to men or women. However, the sex hormones appear to modulate differently the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), which plays a central role in the regulation of blood pressure. Today, little is known about the effects of sex on the efficacy of therapies that antagonize the RAS, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).

OBJECTIVE:

To identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of ACEIs and ARBs in preventing major cardiovascular outcomes, determine what proportion of the trial participants were female, and evaluate whether there was any evidence of a sex difference in the efficacy of these agents.

METHODS:

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that used either ACEIs or ARBs for the treatment of hypertension.

RESULTS:

Thirteen ACEI trials and nine ARB trials were identified. Sex-specific outcome data were available in six of the ACEI trials and three of the ARB trials. These trials enrolled 74,105 patients; 39.1% were women. Seven of the nine trials indicated that ACEIs or ARBs may be slightly more beneficial in men. The magnitude of these differences, in most trials, was small.

CONCLUSIONS:

Sex-specific data are reported in 43% of large hypertension clinical trials. Review of the trials reporting sex-specific effect sizes indicates that ACEIs and ARBs may be more effective in men.     

Benefits and Risks of Aliskiren Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Analyses of the 3A Registry

The authors sought to retrospectively analyze the real‐world evidence on aliskiren in diabetic patients with or without concomitant renin‐angiotensin system (RAS) blocker use based on the Registry for Ambulant Therapy With RAS Inhibitors in Hypertension Patients in Germany (3A). Of 14,986 patients included, 3772 patients had diabetes and 28.5% received aliskiren, 14.3% received angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), 35.4% received aliskiren plus an ACE inhibitor/ARB, and 10.5% received other drugs. Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (baseline BP 148±15.8/84.0±10.9 mm Hg) revealed stronger diastolic BP reduction for aliskiren plus ACE inhibitor/ARB than aliskiren alone in the low (2.8±0.5 vs 0.6±0.6; P=.004) and intermediate (5.9±0.5 vs 4.5±0.5; P=.04) baseline BP groups. There was a lesser ambulatory BP reduction observed for patients receiving non‐RAS in the high baseline category for both systolic (12.5±1.8 vs 17.1±1.0; P=.02) and diastolic (6.9±1.0 vs 9.8±0.6; P=.01) BP. In patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes, aliskiren was beneficial in lowering BP, with no observed increases in major adverse effects compared with RAS‐blocking therapy alone.