Salvage chemotherapy with bevacizumab for recurrent alkylator-refractory anaplastic astrocytoma

A retrospective study of bevacizumab only in adults with recurrent temozolomide (TMZ)-refractory anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) with a primary objective of determining progression free survival (PFS). There is no standard therapy for alkylator-resistant AA and hence a need exists for new therapies. Twenty-five patients (15 men; 10 women) ages 26–63 (median 50), with radiographically recurrent AA were treated. All patients had previously been treated with surgery, involved-field radiotherapy, and alkylator-based chemotherapy. Fourteen patients underwent repeat surgery. Patients were treated at second recurrence with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg), once every 2 weeks (defined as a single cycle). Neurological evaluation was performed every 2 weeks and neuroradiographic assessment following the initial two cycles of bevacizumab and subsequently after every four cycles of bevacizumab. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. A total of 360 cycles of bevacizumab (median 14 cycles; range 2–40) was administered. Bevacizumab-related toxicity included fatigue (14 patients; 2 grade 3), leukopenia (7; 1 grade 3), deep vein thrombosis (5; 2 grade 3), hypertension (5; 1 grade 3), anemia (4; 0 grade 3) and wound dehiscence (1; 1 grade 3). Sixteen patients (64%) demonstrated a partial radiographic response, 2 (8.0%) stable disease and 7 (28%) progressive disease following two cycles of bevacizumab. Time to tumor progression ranged from 1 to 20 months (median: 7). Survival ranged from 2 to 23 months (median: 9.0). 6-month and 12-month PFS were 60 and 20%, respectively. Bevacizumab demonstrated efficacy and acceptable toxicity in this cohort of adults with recurrent alkylator refractory AA.     

Salvage therapy with single agent bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma

A retrospective evaluation of single agent bevacizumab in adults with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with an objective of determining progression free survival (PFS). There is no standard therapy for recurrent GBM after failure of alkylator-based chemotherapy. A total of 50 adults, ages 36–70 years (median 64), with recurrent GBM were treated. All patients had previously been treated with surgery, concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide, post-radiotherapy temozolomide and in 34 patients, one salvage regimen (PCV: 21, cyclophosphamide: 13). A total of 13 patients underwent repeat surgery. Patients were treated at first or second recurrence with bevacizumab, once every 2 weeks, defined as a single cycle. Neurological evaluation was performed every 2 weeks and neuroradiographic assessment following the initial 2 cycles of bevacizumab and subsequently after every 4 cycles of bevacizumab. A total of 468 cycles of bevacizumab (median 2 cycles; range 1–30) was administered. Bevacizumab-related toxicity included fatigue (16 patients; 4 grade 3), leukopenia (9; 1 grade 3), anemia (5; 0 grade 3), hypertension (7; 1 grade 3), deep vein thrombosis (4; 1 grade 3) and wound dehiscence (2; 1 grade 3). 21 patients (42%) demonstrated a partial radiographic response and 29 (58%) progressive disease following 1–2 cycles of bevacizumab. Time to tumor progression ranged from 0.5 to 15 months (median: 1.0 months). Survival ranged from 2 to 17 months (median: 8.5 months). 6-month and 12-month PFS were 42% and 22% respectively. Single agent bevacizumab demonstrated efficacy and acceptable toxicity in this cohort of adults with recurrent alkylator-refractory GBM.     

Phase 2 trial of a novel capecitabine dosing schedule in combination with bevacizumab for patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND:

Capecitabine has antitumor activity in metastatic breast cancer (MBC); however, its optimal dose and schedule remain unclear. Mathematical modeling predicts that a capecitabine schedule 7 days of treatment followed by 7 days of rest (7—7) will improve efficacy and minimize toxicity. Bevacizumab has demonstrated the ability to improve outcomes when it is added to chemotherapy, including capecitabine, in the first‐line and second‐line settings.

METHODS:

Patients with measurable MBC received oral capecitabine (2000 mg twice daily; 7—7), and intravenous bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was the response rate. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, the clinical benefit rate, and progression‐free survival (PFS).

RESULTS:

Forty‐one patients were treated. After a median of 7 cycles (range, 1‐32 cycles), partial responses were observed in 20% of patients, and stable disease for ≥6 months was noted in 35% patients. The median PFS was 8 months. The most common treatment‐related toxicities were hand‐foot syndrome (49% grade 2, 20% grade 3/4) hypertension (12% grade 2, 10% grade 3/4), and fatigue (12% grade 2, 2% grade 3/4). Diarrhea (5% grade 2, 0% grade 3/4), nausea (0% grade 2‐4), and vomiting (0% grade 2‐4) were rare.

CONCLUSIONS:

Capecitabine administered for 7 days followed by a 7‐day rest in combination with bevacizumab had modest efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with MBC. Gastrointestinal toxicity with this schedule was minimal. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Temozolomide for recurrent intracranial supratentorial platinum‐refractory ependymoma

BACKGROUND:

To the authors' knowledge, there currently is no standard therapy for platinum‐resistant ependymoma; hence, a need exists for new therapies. In the current study, a retrospective evaluation of temozolomide (TMZ) in adults with recurrent, supratentorial, platinum‐refractory, World Health Organization grade 2 ependymoma was performed, with an objective of determining 6‐month progression‐free survival (PFS).

METHODS:

A total of 25 patients, ages 28 to 63 years, with recurrent ependymoma were treated. All patients had previously been treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and platinum‐based chemotherapy (cisplatin in 15 patients and carboplatin in 10 patients). Nine patients underwent repeat surgery. Patients were treated at the time of second recurrence with TMZ (5 consecutive days), once every 4 weeks, which was defined as a single cycle. Neurologic evaluation was performed every 4 weeks and neuroradiographic assessment every 8 weeks.

RESULTS:

A total of 68 cycles of TMZ (median, 2 cycles; range, 1‐6 cycles) was administered. TMZ‐related toxicity included leukopenia (7 patients; 1 with grade 3 [grade was determine according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 3.0]), constipation (6 patients; none with grade 3), fatigue (5 patients; none with grade 3), anemia (2; none with grade 3), thrombocytopenia (2; none with grade 3), and deep vein thrombosis (2; none with grade 3). One patient (4%) demonstrated a partial radiographic response, 9 (36%) had stable disease, and 15 (60%) developed progressive disease after 2 cycles of TMZ. Time to tumor progression ranged from 1 to 7 months (median, 2 months). Survival ranged from 2 to 8 months (median, 3 months). The 6‐month and 12‐month PFS were 2% and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

TMZ in this dose schedule demonstrated little efficacy in a cohort of adults with recurrent, intracranial, platinum‐refractory ependymoma. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Bevacizumab and daily temozolomide for recurrent glioblastoma

BACKGROUND:

The authors performed a phase 2 trial of combined protracted daily temozolomide and biweekly bevacizumab for patients with recurrent glioblastoma who had previously received radiation therapy and temozolomide.

METHODS:

There was no limit on the number of previous disease progressions or previous regimens allowed. Thirty‐two adult patients were enrolled. Patients received temozolomide 50 mg/m² daily and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 14 days. Patients underwent physical examination and brain magnetic resonance imaging every 8 weeks.

RESULTS:

The authors observed a 6‐month progression‐free survival (PFS) rate of 18.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.6%‐33.7%) and a median PFS of 15.8 weeks. The median overall survival (OS) was 37 weeks, the 6‐month OS rate was 62.5% (95% CI, 43.5%‐76.7%), and the 12‐month OS rate was 31.3% (95% CI, 16.4%‐47.3%). Nine patients (28%) had a radiographic response, and 7 patients (22%) had disease progression within the first 8 weeks of treatment. Patterns of progression were available for 21 patients. The authors observed that 52% of patients (n = 11) progressed locally, 38% (n = 8) progressed with a diffuse pattern, and 10% (n = 2) progressed at a distant site. Two patients discontinued therapy secondary to toxicity (prolonged thrombocytopenia and grade 4 pancreatitis). One patient experienced grade 5 pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current study demonstrated that a regimen of combined daily temozolomide and biweekly bevacizumab had some activity and was well tolerated. However, the results obtained in this study were inferior to those observed in studies of bevacizumab monotherapy and of combined irinotecan and bevacizumab therapy. The current patient population was more heterogeneous and was pretreated more heavily than patients in previous studies. Cancer 2012;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Phase 2 study of carboplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma after progression on bevacizumab therapy

BACKGROUND:

The efficacy of carboplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab among recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients after prior progression on bevacizumab therapy in a phase 2, open‐label, single‐arm trial was evaluated.

METHODS:

Eligible patients received carboplatin (area under the plasma curve [AUC] 4 mg/ml‐min) on day 1, whereas bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) and irinotecan (340 mg/m² for patients on CYP3A enzyme‐inducing anti‐epileptics [EIAEDs] and 125 mg/m² for patients not on EIAEDs) were administered on days 1 and 14 of every 28‐day cycle. Patients were evaluated after each of the first 2 cycles and then after every other cycle. Treatment continued until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, noncompliance, or voluntary withdrawal. The primary end point was progression‐free survival at 6 months (PFS‐6), and secondary end points included safety and median overall survival (OS).

RESULTS:

All patients had progression on at least 1 prior bevacizumab regimen and 56% enrolled after either second or third overall progression. The median OS was 5.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0‐7.0 months) and PFS‐6 rate was 16% (95% CI, 5.0%‐32.5%). The most common grade 3 or 4 events were hematologic and occurred in 29% of cycles. Nine patients (38%) required dose modification. There were no treatment‐related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS:

Carboplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab was associated with modest activity and adequate safety among recurrent GBM patients who progressed on bevacizumab previously. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Correlation between arterial spin-labeling perfusion and histopathological vascular density of pediatric intracranial tumors

A single institution retrospective evaluation of nivolumab following disease progression on bevacizumab in adults with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with an objective of determining progression free survival (PFS). There is no accepted therapy for recurrent GBM after failure of bevacizumab. 16 adults, ages 52–72 years (median 62), with recurrent GBM were treated. All patients had previously been treated with surgery, concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide, and post-radiotherapy temozolomide. Bevacizumab (with or without lomustine) was administered to all patients at first recurrence. Patients were treated with nivolumab only (3 mg/kg) once every 2 weeks at second recurrence. One cycle of nivolumab was defined as 2 treatments. Neurological evaluation was performed bi-weekly and neuroradiographic assessment every 4 weeks. A total of 37 treatment cycles (median 2) were administered of nivolumab in which there were 14 Grade 2 adverse events (AEs) and Grade 3 AEs in two patients. No Grade 4 or 5 AEs were seen. Following 1 month of nivolumab, seven patients demonstrated progressive disease and discontinued therapy. No patient demonstrated a response though nine patients demonstrated neuroradiographic stable response. Survival in the entire cohort ranged from 2 to 6 months with a median of 3.5 months (CI 2.8, 4.2). Median and 6-month PFS at 6 months was 2.0 months (range 1–5 months; CI 1.3, 2.7) and 0% respectively. Nivolumab salvage therapy demonstrated no survival advantage in patients with recurrent bevacizumab refractory GBM emphasizing a continued unmet need in neuro-oncology.     

Phase 2 study of carboplatin,docetaxel, and bevacizumab as frontline treatment for advanced nonsmall‐cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND:

Bevacizumab has recently been demonstrated to prolong overall survival when added to carboplatin and paclitaxel for chemotherapy‐naïve patients with nonsquamous nonsmall‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the effects of combining bevacizumab with other standard, front‐line, platinum‐based doublets have not been extensively explored. We designed this single treatment arm, phase 2 trial to determine whether the combination of carboplatin, docetaxel, and bevacizumab is tolerable and prolongs progression‐free survival of chemotherapy‐naïve patients with advanced, nonsquamous NSCLC.

METHODS:

Forty patients were treated with up to 6 cycles of carboplatin (AUC 6), docetaxel (75 mg/m²), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on Day 1 every 21 days. Patients with an objective response or stable disease received maintenance bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) every 21 days until disease progression. The primary endpoint was median progression‐free survival. Secondary endpoints included safety, response rates, and overall survival.

RESULTS:

The median number of chemotherapy and maintenance bevacizumab cycles/patient was 6 and 2, respectively. Grades 3‐5 adverse events included febrile granulocytopenia (10%), infections (13%), bleeding (13%), thrombotic events (13%), hypertension (5%), bowel perforation (5%), and proteinuria (3%). Median progression‐free survival was 7.9 months and median overall survival was 16.5 months. Partial responses were observed in 21 patients (53%), and stable disease ≥6 weeks occurred in another 17 patients (43%), for a disease control rate of 95%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Carboplatin, docetaxel, and bevacizumab were feasible and effective for front‐line treatment of advanced, nonsquamous NSCLC. These data provide further evidence that bevacizumab may be used in combination with multiple standard, platinum‐based doublets in this setting. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Recurrent spinal cord glioblastoma: salvage therapy with bevacizumab

Primary spinal cord tumors constitute 2–4% of all primary central nervous system malignancies in adults of which less than 5% are glioblastoma. A retrospective evaluation to determine toxicity and response to bevacizumab in patients with recurrent spinal cord glioblastoma. Six patients (4 males; 2 females: median age 34 years) with recurrent spinal cord glioblastoma were treated with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg given once every 2 weeks wherein 2 treatments constituted a cycle of therapy). All patients had failed surgery and temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy and post-radiotherapy temozolomide. Blood counts, chemistry panel, urine protein to creatinine ratio and neurologic examination were obtained bi-weekly. Contrast-enhanced spine MRI was performed after one cycle of therapy and thereafter following every two cycles of bevacizumab. Treatment-related complications included fatigue in six patients, constipation in 4, hypertension in 2, venous thrombosis in 2, and infection without neutropenia in 2. There were three grade 3 toxicities (1 each fatigue, leukopenia and venous thrombosis). There were no treatment-related deaths. After one cycle of bevacizumab, one patient (17%) demonstrated progressive disease, 2 (34%) partial responses and three (51%) stable disease. Overall median response or stable disease duration (disease free progression) was 7 months (range 3–11 months). Overall median survival was 9 months (range of 5–13 months). Bevacizumab is well tolerated, has tolerable toxicity and apparent activity in this small cohort of adults with recurrent spinal cord glioblastoma.     

Retrospective study of carmustine or lomustine with bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma patients who have failed prior bevacizumab

Background

Currently, there are no known effective treatments for recurrent glioblastoma once patients have progressed on a bevacizumab-containing regimen. We examined the efficacy of adding nitrosoureas to bevacizumab in patients who progressed while on an initial bevacizumab-containing regimen.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we identified adult patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma (WHO grade IV) who were treated with lomustine or carmustine in combination with bevacizumab as a second or third regimen after failing an alternative initial bevacizumab-containing regimen. Response rate (RR), 6-month progression free survival (PFS6), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed for each treatment.

Results

Forty-two patients were identified (28 males) with a median age of 49 years (range, 24–78 y). Of 42 patients, 28 received lomustine (n = 22) or carmustine (n = 6) with bevacizumab as their second bevacizumab-containing regimen, and 14 received lomustine (n = 11) or carmustine (n = 3) as their third bevacizumab-containing regimen. While the median PFS for the initial bevacizumab-containing regimen was 16.3 weeks, the median PFS for the nitrosourea-containing bevacizumab regimen was 6.3 weeks. Patients had an RR of 44% and a PFS6 rate of 26% during the initial bevacizumab regimen and an RR of 0% and a PFS6 rate of 3% during the nitrosourea-containing bevacizumab regimen. There was increased grade 3–4 toxicity (45% vs 19%, P = .010) during the nitrosourea-containing bevacizumab regimen relative to the initial bevacizumab regimen. Median overall survival was 18.7 weeks from initiation of the nitrosourea-containing bevacizumab regimen.

Conclusion

The addition of lomustine or carmustine to bevacizumab after a patient has already progressed on a bevacizumab-containing regimen does not appear to provide benefit for most patients and is associated with additional toxicity with the doses used in this cohort.     

Bevacizumab in Combination With Radiotherapy and Temozolomide for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme

Background.

Patients with a newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) have a high risk of recurrent disease with a dismal outcome despite intensive treatment of sequential surgery and chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ), followed by TMZ as a single agent. Bevacizumab (BV) may increase response rates to chemotherapy in the recurrent treatment setting of GBM. We hypothesized that a neoadjuvant treatment strategy for patients with newly diagnosed GBM using chemoradiotherapy plus BV would improve resectability and thus survival. We performed a phase II trial of the treatment strategy of BV plus chemoradiation to determine the safety of this combination in patients who had already undergone primary surgery for their GBM.

Methods.

After a biopsy (6 patients) or a resection (13 patients) of a newly diagnosed GBM, 19 patients received radiotherapy (30 fractions of 2 Gy) in combination with daily TMZ 75 mg/m² and BV 10 mg/kg on days 1, 14, and 28, followed by 6 monthly cycles of TMZ 150–200 mg/m² on days 1–5.

Results.

The overall response rate was 26%. Three patients had a complete response after resection, and in two patients, a complete response after resection followed by chemoradiation plus BV was seen. No grade 3–4 toxicities were observed during combination treatment. The median progression-free survival was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.3–14.4 months). The median overall survival was 16 months (95% CI: 8.1–26.3 months), similar to a matched control group that received standard chemoradiotherapy from our institution.

Conclusion.

Combination of bevacizumab with radiotherapy and TMZ is safe and feasible in patients with newly diagnosed GBM, but because of low response rates, this treatment strategy does not favor a neoadjuvant approach.     

Concurrent bevacizumab with a sequential regimen of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel and capecitabine as neoadjuvant therapy for HER2- locally advanced breast cancer: a phase II trial of the NSABP Foundation Research Group

Background

Bevacizumab with chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The purpose of this trial was to determine the activity and safety profile of neoadjuvant bevacizumab with chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

Methods

Between November 2006 and August 2007, 45 women with HER2^– LABC began preoperative standard AC (doxorubicin [Adriamycin], cyclophosphamide) × 4 cycles followed by docetaxel 75 mg/m² intravenously (I.V.) on day 1 and capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily on days 1-14 (TX, docetaxel [Taxotere] and capecitabine [Xeloda]) every 21 days for 4 cycles. Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg I.V. was given concurrently with chemotherapy every 21 days for a total of 6 preoperative doses. Postoperatively bevacizumab was resumed for a total of 10 doses. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast.

Results

Thirty patients (66.7%) had stage IIIA disease, 12 (26.7%) patients had stage IIIB, and 3 patients (6.7%) had stage IIIC. Of these, 10 (22%) had inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), and 27 (60%) had estrogen receptor (ER)⁺ disease. A pCR in the breast with negative axillary nodes was documented in 4 (9%) of 45 patients. Toxicities that were seen with AC and bevacizumab included fatigue (grade 2/3; 31% and 9%, respectively), mucositis (grade 2/3; 29% and 2%, respectively), and headache (grade 2/3; 16% and 7%, respectively). Toxicities seen with TX and bevacizumab included mucositis (grade 2/3; 48% and 25%, respectively), fatigue (grade 2/3; 43% and 18%, respectively), and hand-foot syndrome (grade 2/3; 34% and 23%, respectively).

Conclusions

This regimen demonstrated only modest activity with substantial toxicity and does not appear to warrant further evaluation.     

Bevacizumab treatment of symptomatic pseudoprogression after boron neutron capture therapy for recurrent malignant gliomas. Report of 2 cases

Background

Bevacizumab, an anti–vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, has been used for the treatment of radiation necrosis. Thus far, however, there has been no definitive report on its use for the treatment of symptomatic pseudoprogression. Here we report 2 cases of successful treatment with bevacizumab for symptomatic pseudoprogression after boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) was applied for recurrent malignant gliomas.

Methods

Two recurrent malignant gliomas received BNCT. Both cases were treated with intravenous administration of bevacizumab at the deterioration that seemed to be symptomatic pseudoprogression.

Results

The first case was recurrent glioblastoma multiforme and the second was recurrent anaplastic oligoastrocytoma. Both cases recurred after standard chemoradiotherapy and were referred to our institute for BNCT, which is tumor-selective particle radiation. Just prior to neutron irradiation, PET with an amino acid tracer was applied in each case to confirm tumor recurrence. Both cases showed deterioration in symptoms, as well as on MRI, at intervals of 4 months and 2 months, respectively, after BNCT. For the first case, a second PET was applied in order to confirm no increase in tracer uptake. We diagnosed both cases as symptomatic pseudoprogression and started the intravenous administration of 5 mg/kg bevacizumab biweekly with 6 cycles. Both cases responded well to this, showing rapid and dramatic improvement in neuroimaging and clinical symptoms. No tumor progression was observed 8 months after BNCT.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab showed marked effects on symptomatic pseudoprogression after BNCT. BNCT combined with bevacizumab may prolong the survival of patients with recurrent malignant gliomas.     

Results from AMBER,a randomized phase 2 study of bevacizumab and bortezomib versus bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND.

Newer systemic therapies have significantly advanced the treatment of multiple myeloma, but additional agents are needed. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma that inhibits tumor angiogenesis, a process that has been implicated in multiple myeloma pathogenesis.

METHODS.

In AMBER(“A Randomized, Blinded, Placebo‐Controlled, Multicenter, Phase II Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma”), patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma were randomized to receive bortezomib (1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each 21‐day cycle) and either placebo or bevacizumab (15 mg/kg on day 1 of each cycle) for up to 8 cycles. At completion, patients in the bortezomib‐plus‐bevacizumab arm could continue bevacizumab until they developed progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS).

RESULTS.

The stratified hazard ratio of PFS for the bevacizumab‐containing arm (n = 49) relative to the bortezomib monotherapy arm (n = 53) was 0.743 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43‐1.28; P = .2804); the median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.4‐8.5 months) and 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.2‐7.2 months), respectively; the overall response rates were 51% and 43.4% (P = .4029), respectively; and the median response duration was 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.73‐11.83 months) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.86‐8.31 months), respectively. Frequent adverse events occurred at similar rates across treatment arms, but hypertension, fatigue, and neuralgia occurred more frequently in the bevacizumab‐containing arm.

CONCLUSIONS.

The addition of bevacizumab to bortezomib in unselected patients with pretreated multiple myeloma did not result in significant improvements in efficacy outcomes. The combination was well tolerated, and no new safety concerns for either agent were identified. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

The Breast Avastin Trial: phase II study of bevacizumab maintenance therapy after induction chemotherapy with docetaxel and capecitabine for the first-line treatment of patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer

Background

Therapeutic approach for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is still controversial. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for MBC. The feasibility of bevacizumab maintenance therapy in this setting was also evaluated.

Patients and methods

In this single-arm, multicenter phase II study, patients received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 60 mg/m² on day 1, plus capecitabine 900 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14 every 21 days. Treatment was administered for up to 6 cycles, then bevacizumab continued until progressive disease. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points were tumor response rate, overall survival, and toxicity.

Results

Seventy-nine eligible patients were treated with bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel plus capecitabine. The overall response rate was 61 %, with a complete response rate of 8 % and a median duration of response of 10 months. At a median follow-up of 28 months, the median PFS was 11 months. Fifty-two (65 %) patients received bevacizumab maintenance therapy for a median duration of 7 months (range 1 to 33+). Neutropenia was the most common grade 3–4 toxicity (28.1 % of patients), and two fatal adverse events occurred (septic shock and gastrointestinal perforation).

Conclusions

Bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel and capecitabine demonstrates significant activity and quite acceptable toxicity profile as first-line treatment of MBC. Subsequent maintenance therapy with bevacizumab is feasible for a long period of stable disease. Results deserve confirmation.     

Clinical effect of temozolomide-based chemotherapy in poorly differentiated endocrine carcinoma after progression on first-line chemotherapy

BACKGROUND:

Patients with metastatic poorly differentiated endocrine carcinoma (PDEC) usually have a short survival. The chemotherapy combination of cisplatin and etoposide is frequently used as first‐line palliative chemotherapy. There are, however, no published studies concerning second‐line treatment of the disease. Temozolomide has shown clinical effect in well‐differentiated endocrine carcinomas. This study was performed to evaluate the effect of temozolomide in PDEC patients who had progressed on first‐line treatment.

METHODS:

Twenty‐five patients with PDEC (mainly gastrointestinal) were treated with temozolomide alone or in combination with capecitabine. A subset of patient also received bevacizumab. MGMT methylation was analyzed in tissue specimens. Data were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS:

One patient had a complete response, and 7 patients had partial response (33% response rate). Median duration of response was 19 months. Another 9 (38%) patients had a stable disease, after progression at inclusion, with a median duration of 18 months. Median progression‐free survival for all patients was 6 months, and median overall survival was 22 months. Only 1 patient had a MGMT methylation.

CONCLUSIONS:

Treatment with temozolomide alone or in combination with capecitabine and bevacizumab resulted in objective response or stabilization in 71% of PDEC patients who failed on first‐line chemotherapy. These results indicated that temozolomide may be used as second‐line treatment in PDEC. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Phase 2 trial of maintenance bevacizumab alone after bevacizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin in advanced,nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND:

The authors performed a phase 2 study of bevacizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with advanced, nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer.

METHODS:

Previously untreated patients with advanced, nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, pemetrexed 500 mg/m² and carboplatin at an area under the concentration‐time curve of 6 intravenously on day 1 every 21 days. Responding or stable patients who completed 6 cycles then received bevacizumab maintenance every 21 days until disease progression.

RESULTS:

In total, 43 patients (40 who were evaluable for response) were entered on the study. Treatment‐related grade 3/4 toxicities were low and included febrile neutropenia (2%), neutropenia (28%), anemia (18%), thrombocytopenia (11%), hypertension (7%), epistaxis (5%), venous thrombosis (8%), dyspnea (7%), rectovaginal fistula (2.3%), infusion reaction (2%), and cerebrovascular event (2%). One patient died from complications of venous thromboembolism and cerebrovascular accident after Cycle 2. Minimal clinically significant toxicity occurred during maintenance bevacizumab. Two complete responses (5%) were observed, and 17 patients (42%) had a partial response. Fifteen patients (38%) displayed disease stability. The overall disease control rate was 85%. At a median follow‐up of 15.8 months, the median progression‐free survival was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval, 5.9‐8.3 months), and the median overall survival was 17.1 months (95% confidence interval, 8.8‐25.5 months).

CONCLUSIONS:

Combined bevacizumab, pemetrexed, and carboplatin followed by maintenance bevacizumab was well tolerated and displayed remarkable activity in patients with previously untreated, advanced, nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Metastatic melanoma: prognostic factors and survival in patients with brain metastases

There is no standard therapy for recurrent anaplastic glioma (AG). Salvage therapies include alkylator-based chemotherapy, re-resection with or without carmustine implants, re-irradiation and bevacizumab. Bendamustine is a novel bifunctional alkylator with CNS penetration never previously evaluated in AG. Assess response and toxicity of bendamustine in recurrent AG in a phase II trial. Adults with radiation and temozolomide refractory recurrent AG were treated with bendamustine. A cycle of bendamustine was defined as two consecutive days of treatment (100 mg/m²/day) administered once every 4 weeks. Success of treatment was defined as progression free survival (PFS) at 6 months of 40?% or better. Twenty-six adults [16 males; 10 females: median age 40 years (range 30–65)] were treated, 12 at first recurrence and 17 at second recurrence. Prior salvage therapy included re-resection (14), chemotherapy (11) and re-radiation (2). Grade 3 treatment-related toxicities included lymphopenia (11 patients; Grade 4 in 3), myalgia, pneumonia, diarrhea, leukopenia, allergic reaction and thrombocytopenia in one patient each. One patient discontinued therapy due to toxicity. There were five instances of bendamustine dose delays all due to lymphopenia. There were no dose reductions due to toxicity. The median number of cycles of therapy was 3 (range 1–8). Best radiographic response was progressive disease in 12 (46?%), stable disease in 13 (50?%) and partial response in 1 (4?%). Median, 6- and 12-month PFS was 2.7 months (range 1–52), 27 and 8?% respectively. In patients with recurrent AG refractory to Z, bendamustine has manageable toxicity and modest single agent activity though not meeting pre-specified study criteria.     

Phase 2 trial of concurrent bevacizumab and transhepatic arterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND:

Vascular endothelial growth factor is up‐regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is further up‐regulated after transhepatic arterial chemoembolization. The authors of this report conducted a phase 2 trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab combined with chemoembolization in patients with unresectable HCC.

METHODS:

Patients who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance of status 0 to 2, a Child‐Pugh score of A or B, and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C HCC were eligible. Treatment consisted of bevacizumab every 2 weeks and chemoembolization during the third week of a 6‐week cycle for up to 3 cycles over 6 months. The primary endpoints were safety and efficacy.

RESULTS:

Twenty‐five patients received chemoembolization and bevacizumab. The most common grade 3 and 4 events after the first treatment cycle were leukocytopenia (12%), fatigue (12%), and hyponatremia (12%). Serious toxicities that had a known association with bevacizumab were observed in 4 patients. Thirty‐day mortality was 0%. The median time to tumor progression for the targeted lesions was not reached, and overall survival was 10.8 months. The objective response rate was 60% using enhancement response evaluation criteria, and the disease control rate was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Concurrent treatment with bevacizumab and chemoembolization was safe in carefully selected patients and demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with unresectable HCC. These results support the further development of bevacizumab combined with chemoembolization as a treatment for unresectable HCC. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

A randomized phase 2 study of temozolomide and bevacizumab or nab‐paclitaxel,carboplatin, and bevacizumab in patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma

BACKGROUND:

Increasing evidence shows chemotherapy in combination with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition is a clinically active therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma (MM).

METHODS:

A phase 2 trial was conducted in chemotherapy‐naive patients with unresectable stage IV MM who were randomized to temozolomide (200 mg/m² on days 1 through 5) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 15) every 28 days (Regimen TB) or nab‐paclitaxel (100 mg/m², or 80 mg/m² post‐addendum 5 secondary to toxicity, on days 1, 8, and 15), bevacizumab (10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15), and carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 6 on day 1, or AUC 5 post‐addendum 5) every 28 days (Regimen ABC). Accrual goal was 41 patients per regimen. The primary aim of this study was to estimate progression‐free survival rate at 6 months (PFS6) in each regimen. A regimen would be considered promising if its PFS6 rate was > 60%.

RESULTS:

Ninety‐three eligible patients (42 TB and 51 ABC) were enrolled. The majority of patients had M1c disease (20 TB and 26 ABC). The median PFS and overall survival times with ABC were 6.7 months and 13.9 months, respectively. Median PFS time and median overall survival with TB were 3.8 months and 12.3 months, respectively. The most common severe toxicities (≥ grade 3) in both regimens were cytopenias, fatigue, and thrombosis. Among the first 41 patients enrolled onto each regimen, PFS6 rate was 32.8% (95% confidence interval: 21.1%‐51.2%) for TB and 56.1% (90% confidence interval: 44.7%‐70.4%) for ABC.

CONCLUSIONS:

The addition of bevacizumab to nab‐paclitaxel and carboplatin shows promising activity despite tolerability issues. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.