Multivariate analysis of recurrence after anterior resection for colorectal carcinoma

We performed a multivariate analysis of survival data from 278 patients who underwent potentially curative anterior resection with hand-sewn anastomosis for nonobstructing colorectal carcinoma to evaluate the interaction of the resection margin with distance from the anal verge and their contributions to local and distant recurrence. Cumulative 5-year disease-free survival was 66 percent for the 258 patients with complete follow-up. Forty-nine patients (19 percent) had local recurrence and 42 (16 percent) developed initial distant metastases. Local recurrence rates increased with increasing age and with more advanced Dukes' stage. It developed in twice as many patients with colostomies as without colostomies. Distant metastases developed significantly more often in patients with nodal involvement and in patients with resection margins exceeding 3.5 cm. Forty-four percent of patients with lesions within 14 cm of the anal verge resected with margins of at least 3.5 cm developed distant recurrence. This study suggests that aggressive pelvic dissection to achieve resection margins greater than 3.5 cm may contribute to tumor dissemination and subsequent distant metastases.     

Current problems of the surgical treatment of rectal cancer: analysis of the literature and personal experience

The surgical procedure is a crucial factor in preventing local recurrence in rectal cancer, and total mesorectal excision (TME) particularly is widely accepted as being associated with a decreased local recurrence rate. In this study, concerning 187 patients with rectal cancer, we compare conventional surgery, performed in 140 patients from 1979 to 1993, with a standardised TME procedure in 47 patients over the period from 1994 to 1998. The first group not treated by TME were operated on for 56 (40%) tumours of the upper rectum and 84 (60%) of the lower rectum; 35 (25%) were Dukes' A, 77 Dukes' B and 28 (20%) Dukes' C. 42 abdominoperineal amputations (30%) and 98 anterior resections (70%) were performed. The second group in which TME was performed comprised 17 (36%) tumours of the upper rectum and 30 (64%) of the lower rectum, 8 (17%) in stage I AJCC (Dukes' A), 16 (34%) in II (B) and 23 (49%) in III (C). 9 abdominoperineal amputations (19%) and 38 anterior resections (81%) were performed, 8 (21%) with an ultra-low anastomosis. In the first group of patients we observed 28 local recurrences (20%) and a 5-year disease-free survival in 50% of cases. In the second group we achieved a decreased rate of local recurrence (10.6%) which is about half that observed after conventional surgery, but there was no significant difference in survival. These data confirm the effectiveness of TME in reducing local recurrence rate, according to the literature; in future this procedure can get to reconsider the role of adjuvant therapy in the management of rectal cancer.     

Local recurrence after sphincter-saving resection for rectal adenocarcinoma

Local pelvic-perineal recurrences were evaluated in 40 patients who underwent a sphincter-saving resection for rectal adenocarcinoma at Roswell Park Memorial Institute. The length of follow-up was at least 5 years or until death in all but one patient. There were 24 women and 16 men with a median age of 63 years. In 31 patients, the resection was considered to be curative and was considered palliative in the remaining 9 patients. Seven of the 31 patients (23 percent) developed a local recurrence. Two of the seven local recurrences had further resection for curative intent, with one person alive at 88 months. Margins of resection were available in 27 patients. Local recurrence occurred in 4 of 8 patients with distal margins of resection less than 2 cm and in 3 of 19 patients with margins greater than 2 cm. When the lesion was less than 10 cm from the anal verge, local recurrence was more likely to occur than at margins above this level.     

Carcinoma of the rectum: a 10-year experience

A consecutive series of 303 patients with carcinoma of the rectum and distal sigmoid colon treated by a single surgeon over a 10-year period are reported. Of these, 202 underwent an anterior resection, 85 an abdominoperineal excision of the rectum and 16 a coloanal anastomosis. Surgery was considered palliative in 52 patients undergoing anterior resection and 24 undergoing abdominoperineal resection. The 30-day hospital mortality rate was six patients (3 per cent) for anterior resection and two patients (2 per cent) for abdominoperineal resection. Peroperative anastomotic testing demonstrated leakage in five stapled anastomoses; these were rectified and no clinical sequelae occurred. Two patients (1 per cent) developed a clinical anastomotic leak, one of which proved fatal; in each case the intraoperative test was negative. The overall 5-year survival rate was 64 per cent after anterior resection and 52 per cent after abdominoperineal resection; the median follow-up was 64 months. The incidence of local pelvic recurrence was 6.4 per cent after anterior resection and 14 per cent after abdominoperineal (not significant). These results confirm the success of sphincter-saving anterior resection combined with total mesorectal excision, routine full mobilization of the splenic flexure and cancercidal lavage of the distal rectum in the treatment of low rectal carcinomas; morbidity, local recurrence and survival are not compromised.     

Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule

OBJECTIVE: To assess oncologic outcome of patients treated by conservative radical surgery for tumors below 5 cm from the anal verge. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Standard surgical treatment of low rectal cancer below 5 cm from the anal verge is abdominoperineal resection. METHODS: From 1990 to 2003, patients with a nonfixed rectal carcinoma at 4.5 cm or less from the anal verge and without external sphincter infiltration underwent conservative surgery. Surgery included total mesorectal excision with intersphincteric resection, that is, removal of the internal sphincter, to achieve adequate distal margin. Patients with T3 disease or internal sphincter infiltration received preoperative radiotherapy. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients with a tumor at 3 (range 1.5-4.5) cm from the anal verge underwent conservative surgery. There was no mortality and morbidity was 27%. The rate of complete microscopic resection (R0) was 89%, with 98% negative distal margin and 89% negative circumferential margin. In 58 patients with a follow-up of more than 24 months, the rate of local recurrence was 2% and the 5-year overall and disease-free survival were 81% and 70%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The technique of intersphincteric resection permits us to achieve conservative surgery in patients with a tumor close to or in the anal canal without compromising local control and survival. Tumor distance from the anal verge is no longer a limit for sphincter-saving resection.     

Preoperative Radiochemotherapy and Sphincter-Saving Resection for T3 Carcinomas of the Lower Third of the Rectum

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the complications and oncologic and functional results of preoperative radiochemotherapy and sphincter-saving resection for T3 cancers of the lower third of the rectum. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Carcinomas of the lower third of the rectum (i.e., located at or below 6 cm from the anal verge) are usually treated by abdominoperineal resection, especially for T3 lesions. Few data are available evaluating concomitant chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy for increasing sphincter-saving resection in low rectal cancer. METHODS: Between 1995 and 1999, 43 patients underwent preoperative radiochemotherapy with conservative surgery for a low rectal tumor located a mean of 4.5 cm from the anal verge (range 2-6); 70% of the lesions were less than 2 cm from the anal sphincter. There were 40 T3 and 3 T4 tumors. Patients received preoperative radiotherapy with a mean dose of 50 Gy (range 40-54) and concomitant chemotherapy with 5-FU in continuous infusion (n = 36) or bolus (n = 7). Sphincter- saving resection was performed 6 weeks after treatment, in 25 patients by using intersphincteric resection. Coloanal anastomoses were associated with a colonic pouch in 86% of the patients, and all patients had a protecting stoma. RESULTS: There were no deaths related to preoperative radiochemotherapy and surgery. Acute toxicity was mainly due to diarrhea, with 54% of grade 1 to 2. Four anastomotic fistulas and two pelvic hematomas occurred; all patients but one had closure of the stoma. Distal and radial surgical margins were respectively 23 +/- 8 mm (range 10-40) and 8 +/- 4 mm (range 1-20) and were negative in 98% of the patients. Downstaging (pT0-2N0) was observed in 42% of the patients (18/43) and was associated with a greater radial margin (10 vs. 6 mm; P =.02). After a median follow-up of 30 months, the rate of local recurrence was 2% (1/43), and four patients had distal metastases. Overall and disease-free survival rates were both 85% at 3 years. Functional results were good (Kirwan continence I, II) in 79% of the available patients (n = 37). They were slightly altered by intersphincteric resection (57 vs. 75% of perfect continence; NS) but were significantly improved by a colonic pouch (74 vs. 16%; P =.01). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that preoperative radiochemotherapy allowed sphincter-saving resection to be performed with good local control and good functional results in patients with T3 low rectal cancers that would have required abdominoperineal resection in most instances.     

Contributions of pathologic margins and Dukes' stage to local recurrence in colorectal carcinoma

Two hundred fourteen patients with colorectal carcinoma who underwent curative resection for biopsy-proved or autopsy-proved local recurrences with a minimum of 2 years follow-up were evaluated. The only predictive variables for anastomotic recurrence were Dukes' stage and tumor margins. There were 49 Dukes' A lesions with no observed recurrences. There were also 83 Dukes' B lesions and 84 Dukes' C lesions with a total of 18 local recurrences in 214 cases or 8.4 percent (of Duke's B lesions or 6 percent and 14 of Dukes' C lesions or 17 percent). When proximal or distal margins were less than 5 cm there were seven total recurrences (three Dukes' B lesions and four Dukes' C lesions). However, when margins were greater than 5 cm, 11 local recurrences were observed (1 Dukes' B and 10 Dukes' C lesions). It appears that margins are not as important in preventing local recurrences of Dukes' A lesions as they are of both Dukes' B and C lesions. Although the numbers are small in this study, it appears that Dukes' B lesions can be satisfactorily resected with a very low incidence of local recurrence if their margins are 5 cm or greater, whereas if the resected margins are less than 5 cm, the incidence of local recurrences increases from 9 percent (1 of 11 lesions) to 43 percent (3 of 7 lesions), or almost a fivefold increase. Therefore, it appears that good surgical technique and adequate margins of greater than 5 cm are very important in reducing local recurrences of Dukes' B lesions. However, when margins are greater than 5 cm, this does not guarantee freedom from local recurrence of Dukes' C lesions. This may merely reflect the difference in the biologic characteristics among Dukes' A, B, and C lesions and the fact that limited resection, particularly in the rectosigmoid region, cannot possibly remove all intralymphatic disease, which is the presumed culprit in locally recurrent Dukes' C lesions.     

Pelvic resection of recurrent rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The authors describe their experience with pelvic resection of recurrent rectal cancer with emphasis on patient selection for curative intent based on known tumor risk factors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pelvic recurrence is a formidable problem in 30% of patients who have undergone a curative resection of primary rectal cancer. Although radiation can reduce the development of local recurrence and can provide palliation to many patients with localized disease, it is not curative. The authors and others have used the technique of abdominal sacral resection (ABSR) with or without pelvic exenteration to resect pelvic recurrence and its musculoskeletal extensions in selected patients with satisfactory long-term survival. METHODS: The technique of ABSR with or without pelvic exenteration or resection of pelvic viscera, which the authors have described previously, was used in 53 patients with recurrent rectal cancer--47 patients for curative intent and 6 for palliation. Previous surgeries were abdominal perineal resections (APRs) in 26 patients, anterior resections in 19 patients, and other procedures in 2 patients; original primary Dukes' stage was B in 52% and C in 48%. Almost all patients had been irradiated previously, generally in the 4000 to 5900 cGy range. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (before ABSR) were elevated (> 5 ng/mL) in 54%. RESULTS: Postoperative morbidity was encountered in most patients. Mortality was 8.5% in the curative group. Long-term survival for 4 years was achieved in 14 of 43 patients (33%), and 10 patients were alive with an acceptable quality of life after 5 years. Patients who had previous anterior resections or whose preoperative CEA levels were less than 10 ng/mL had a survival rate of approximately 45%, whereas patients with previous APRs and preoperative CEA levels greater than 10 ng/mL had a survival rate of only 15% to 18%. Patients with bone marrow invasion, positive margins, or pelvic node metastases had a median survival of only 10 months. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer can be resected safely with expectation of long-term survival of 33%. Patient selection based on known risk factors can identify patients most likely to benefit from resection and eliminate those who should be treated for palliation only.     

'Close shave' in anterior resection

Of 192 anterior resections for rectal cancer performed over 10 years by one author (R.J.H.), 169 (88 per cent) included total mesorectal excision and all included lavage of the clamped distal rectum. Of this series, 152 (79 per cent) were classed as curative, 110 with a resection margin greater than 1 cm and 42 with a resection margin less than or equal to 1 cm. The group with a greater than 1 cm margin had a significantly lower Dukes' A to B ratio than the group with a margin less than or equal to 1 cm, although the proportion with Dukes' C lesions was similar in both groups (chi 2 = 6.712; P = 0.035). There were no local recurrences in the latter group (95 per cent confidence interval (CI) is 0-5.9 per cent) while there were four (3.6 per cent) in the former group (95 per cent CI is 0.8-7.4 per cent). There were no significant differences in recurrence rates, local and distant, between the two groups (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.2). Reduction of resection margin, provided total mesorectal excision and washout is properly performed, does not increase local recurrence or compromise survival.     

Prospective phase I trial of conservative management of low rectal lesions

The purpose of this study was to assess and function and to compare the morbidity of local excision and postoperative radiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma with the morbidity of abdominoperineal resection. A posterior parasacral approach was used for local excision. All patients had negative margins, and all but one were continent after completion of radiotherapy. Seven patients (29%) had either a wound infection or a fistula in the local excision group. No local failures occurred, although follow-up was only 13 months. Thirteen (50%) of the 26 patients who underwent an abdominoperineal resection developed at least one complication. Combined treatment that spares the rectal sphincters may be preferable in selected patients with low rectal cancer, if long-term disease-free survival is maintained.     

Concept de conservation sphinct��rienne dans la chirurgie du bas et du moyen rectum

Objective

To assess oncologic outcome of patients treated by conservative radical surgery for tumors below 5 cm from the anal verge.

Summary background data

Standard surgical treatment of low rectal cancer below 5 cm from the anal verge is abdominoperineal resection.

Methods

From 1990 to 2003, patients with a nonfixed rectal carcinoma at 4.5 cm or less from the anal verge and without external sphincter infiltration underwent conservative surgery. Surgery included total mesorectal excision with intersphincteric resection, that is, removal of the internal sphincter, to achieve adequate distal margin. Patients with T3 disease or internal sphincter infiltration received preoperative radiotherapy.

Results

Ninety-two patients with a tumor at 3 cm (range 1.5?C4.5) from the anal verge underwent conservative surgery. There was no mortality and morbidity was 27%. The rate of complete microscopic resection (R0) was 89%, with 98% negative distal margin and 89% negative circumferential margin. In 58 patients with a follow-up of more than 24 months, the rate of local recurrence was 2%, and the 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 81% and 70%, respectively.

Conclusion

The technique of intersphincteric resection allows us to achieve conservative surgery in patients with a tumor close to or in the anal canal without compromising local control and survival. The distance of tumor from the anal verge is no longer a limit for sphincter-saving resection.     

Improving survival rates for patients with colorectal cancer.

Between 1 January 1984 and 31 December 1990, 575 patients were operated on for colorectal cancer. The surgical procedure was performed consistently and no patients were lost to follow-up. Almost half of the patients (284 of 575) had tumours of stage I or II, with 5-year survival rates over 90 per cent. After extending the resection margins in 28 cases of colonic carcinoma there has been no case of tumour recurrence. The overall 5-year survival rate for patients with colonic carcinoma was 81 per cent. Complete resection of the mesorectum was mandatory for rectal resection. One-third of the carcinomas in the lower third of the rectum could be resected with maintenance of bowel continuity and an abdominoperineal resection avoided. Not only was the tumour recurrence rate in the former patients lower (10.5 per cent) compared with that in those undergoing abdominoperineal resection (14.3 per cent) but the 5-year survival rate at 90 versus 52 per cent was significantly higher. The overall 5-year survival rate for patients with rectal carcinoma was 71 per cent.     

Cancer of the rectum in elderly patients over the age of seventy-five years. Results of the surgical treatment

The authors reviewed 122 rectal cancers observed over a period of 14 years in patients over the age of 75 years. Sixty-eight patients underwent extensive rectal resection, 17 were treated by local excision, and 28 only underwent a colostomy. Eight patients were excluded for surgery. The analysis of all of these groups showed that perioperative mortality was greater for large resections than for local resections, but with a lower recurrence rate and a higher survival at 3 years. Survival at 5 years after large resections was very close to the natural life expectancy for people of the same age. Moreover, survival was the quality of more comfortable than after local excision, and operative mortality was generally due to organ failure rather than to age itself. Radical surgery does not have to be systematically refused for very old patients, but he discussed in terms of the patients general status.     

Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway

BACKGROUND: Inadvertent perforation of the bowel or tumour is a relatively common complication during resection of rectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to examine intraoperative perforation following the introduction of mesorectal excision as a standard surgical technique in Norway. METHODS: This was a prospective national cohort study of 2873 patients undergoing major resection of rectal carcinoma at 54 Norwegian hospitals from November 1993 to December 1999. RESULTS: The overall perforation rate was 8.1 per cent (234 of 2873 patients). In a multivariate analysis, the risk of perforation was significantly greater in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (odds ratio (OR) 5.6 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 3.5 to 8.8)) and in those aged 80 years or more (OR 2.0 (95 per cent c.i. 1.2 to 3.5)). The 5-year local recurrence rate was 28.8 per cent following perforation, compared with 9.9 per cent in patients with no perforation (P<0.001); survival rates were 41.5 and 67.1 per cent respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The risk of intraoperative perforation was significantly greater in patients with rectal cancer undergoing abdominoperineal resection and in those aged 80 years or more. The high local recurrence rates and reduced survival following perforation call for increased attention to avoid this complication.     

Recurrence and survival after surgical management of rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Reported local recurrence rates for rectal cancer are significantly reduced using a combination of superior surgical technique, in the form of total mesorectal excision, and routine radiotherapy. In an attempt to determine the effectiveness of current local management strategies, a review of Vancouver Island Cancer Centre patients with rectal cancer was performed and the overall local recurrence rate was identified. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 272 rectal cancer patients from 1988 to 1998. Two hundred and twenty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Analysis of patient factors included age, gender, type of surgery, and adjuvant therapy. Tumors were assessed for level, stage, and grade. Local recurrence and distant metastases were also documented. Variables influencing local recurrence in this group were identified and disease-free and actuarial survival determined. RESULTS: Of 229 patients analyzed, 12.7% (29) had local recurrences. Variables influencing local recurrence were number of positive lymph nodes, vascular invasion, and neural invasion. There was no significant difference in local recurrence between patients having anterior resection and those having abdominoperineal resection. None of the patients who received preoperative radiotherapy had a local recurrence. Actuarial disease-free survival was 87% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Limiting local recurrence is one of the most important goals in the treatment of rectal cancer. It is essential to identify those patients with "high risk" tumors as identified by endorectal ultrasound or pathologic features. These patients comprise the group most likely to benefit from a routine mesorectal excision combined with adjuvant radiotherapy.     

Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum.

OBJECTIVE: The authors' aim was to determine survival and recurrence rates in patients undergoing resection of rectal cancer achieved by abdominoperineal resection (APR), coloanal anastomosis (CAA), and anterior resection (AR) without adjuvant therapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The surgery of rectal cancer is controversial; so, too, is its adjuvant management. Questions such as preoperative versus postoperative radiation versus no radiation are key. An approach in which the entire mesorectum is excised has been proposed as yielding low recurrence rates. METHODS: Of 1423 patients with resected rectal cancers, 491 patients were excluded, leaving 932 with a primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated at Mayo. Eighty-six percent were resected for cure. Surgery plus adjuvant treatment was performed in 418, surgery alone in 514. These 514 patients are the subject of this review. Among the 514 patients who underwent surgery alone, APR was performed in 169, CAA in 19, AR in 272, and other procedures in 54. Eighty-seven percent of patients were operated on with curative intent. The mean follow-up was 5.6 years; follow-up was complete in 92%. APR and CAA were performed excising the envelope of rectal mesentery posteriorly and the supporting tissues laterally from the sacral promontory to the pelvic floor. AR was performed using an appropriately wide rectal mesentery resection technique if the tumor was high; if the tumor was in the middle or low rectum, all mesentery was resected. The mean distal margin achieved by AR was 3 +/- 2 cm. RESULTS: Mortality was 2% (12 of 514). Anastomotic leaks after AR occurred in 5% (16 of 291) and overall transient urinary retention in 15%. Eleven percent of patients had a wound infection (abdominal and perineal wound, 30-day, purulence, or cellulitis). The local recurrence and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 7% and 78%, respectively, after AR; 6% and 83%, respectively, after CAA; and 4% and 80%, respectively, after APR. Patients with stage III disease, had a 60% disease-free survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: Complete resection of the envelope of supporting tissues about the rectum during APR, CAA, and AR when tumors were low in the rectum is associated with low mortality, low morbidity, low local recurrence, and good 5-year survival rates. Appropriate "tumor-specific" mesorectal excision during AR when the tumor is high in the rectum is likewise consistent with a low rate of local recurrence and good long-term survival. However, the overall failure rate of 40% in stage III disease (which is independent of surgical technique) means that surgical approaches alone are not sufficient to achieve better long-term survival rates.     

Sphincter-saving surgery in low rectal cancer

A correct surgical approach to rectal cancer today has to make due allowance for both improved overall survival with local control of disease and preservation of the sphincter and urinary and genital functions. Increased understanding of the natural history, the importance of preoperative accurate staging and new surgical techniques may influence future treatment strategies. The aim of this study was to review and make a reappraisal of the role of sphincter-preserving surgery in the treatment of carcinomas of the lower third of the rectum. From January 1999 to June 2004, 63 consecutive total rectal resections were performed at our surgical department. Thirty-five of these patients, who underwent surgery for a primary adenocarcinoma of the distal rectum (3.5 to 8 cm from the anal verge), were reviewed retrospectively. The preoperative clinical assessment was based largely on T staging, tumor size, fixation and distance from the anal verge. Patient stratification, based on the definitive pathological report, was 3 Dukes' stage A (T1 N0), 21 stage B (T2 N0) and 11 stage C (T2-3-4 N+). The distance from the anal verge was > 5 cm in 30 patients and < 5 cm in 5. Sphincter-saving procedures were performed in 28/35 patients (80%); 7 (20%) had abdominoperineal resections of the rectum for very distal, locally extensive tumours or local recurrence (2 patients). The overall recurrence rate was 11.4%. Postoperative morbidity related to the procedures was low: anastomotic leakage occurred in 10.7% (3/28). Perfect continence was documented in 86.3%. The minimum follow-up time is 12 months. Our data, in agreement with the findings of other Authors, appear to bear out the validity of sphincter-saving procedures in the treatment of cancer of the lower third of the rectum. This approach is possible for the majority of patients. Functional results are good, using an accurate nerve-sparing technique, and may be improved by employing a colonic reservoir in selected cases.     

Transitional mucosa at anastomosis. A cause of local tumor recurrence in patients with rectal cancer after anterior resection.

Transitional mucosa adjacent to colorectal cancers is essentially characterized by an excess of sialomucins at the expense of the normally predominant sulphomucins in epithelial cells lining the intestinal crypts which presents the early stage of oncogenic transformation of colorectal epithelium. The presence or absence of sialomucins at the resection margins was studied histochemically using the high iron diamine-alcian blue(HID-AB) stain in 64 rectal cancer patients in Dukes' B stage who underwent curative anterior resection. The correlation was revealed between the presence of sialomucins at the resection margins and subsequent development of local tumour recurrence. Fourteen of 27 patients (51.9%) with sialomucins predominant pattern at either resection margin developed local recurrence compared with 4 of 37 patients (10.8%) with sulphomucins predominant pattern (P less than 0.001). It is suggested that determination of the transitional mucosa around anastomosis in patients treated for the rectal carcinoma by anterior resection appears to identify those with a higher risk of local recurrence.     

Patterns of failure in anorectal melanoma. A guide to surgical therapy

Anorectal melanoma is an aggressive tumor with a reported 5-year survival rate of 6%. Recommendations for local surgical therapy vary from local excision to abdominoperineal resection. Therapy, patterns of failure, and survival were retrospectively examined in 32 patients with anorectal melanoma. Twenty-six patients were treated surgically, 14 with abdominoperineal resection and 12 with local excision. Local recurrence occurred less frequently in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (4 [29%] of 14) compared with patients undergoing local excision (7 [58%] of 12) but developed concomitantly with distant or regional metastasis in all but 2 of the 11 patients whose operations failed locally. Inguinal nodal disease developed in 15 patients (47%). Pelvic nodal disease became apparent in only 2 patients (7%). There was no difference in overall survival between the two surgically treated groups (median survival, 19.5 months for patients treated with abdominoperineal resection vs 18.9 months for patients treated with local excision). Therefore, local excision is recommended when technically feasible since these patients eventually succumb to metastasis regardless of surgical therapy.     

Results of salvage abdominoperineal resection for recurrent anal carcinoma following combined chemoradiation therapy

Combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy is the standard treatment for epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. Failures are often not associated with distant recurrence and are therefore potentially amenable to salvage abdominoperineal resection. The aim of this study was to review our experience with abdominoperineal resection following failure of chemoradiation therapy for epidermoid carcinoma of the anus. Between 1980 and 1998, 17 patients underwent salvage abdominoperineal resection following failure of chemoradiation therapy. Four patients were excluded from survival analysis because resection was performed with palliative intent. Survival curves were based on the method of Kaplan and Meier, and univariate analysis of predictive variables was performed using the log-rank test. Twelve patients underwent abdominoperineal resection for persistent disease and five patients for recurrent disease. No operative deaths occurred, but local complications including perineal wound infection and wound break-down was seen in 8 of 17 patients and 6 of 17 patients, respectively. Patients undergoing omental flap reconstruction (n = 3) or no pelvic reconstruction (n = 5) had a higher incidence of perineal breakdown compared to those undergoing muscle flap reconstruction (n = 9) (P <0.05). The median follow-up time for the patients operated on with curative intent was 53 months. The S-year actuarial survival was 47%. Potential prognostic factors that were not found to have an impact on survival included margin status of resection, sphincter invasion, and degree of differentiation. Only pathologic tumor size greater than 5.0 cm (P <0.00l) and age over 55 years (P <0.0.5) adversely affected survival. Selected patients with recurrent or persistent anal carcinoma following chemoradiation therapy can be offered salvage abdominoperineal resection. This operation is associated with a high incidence of local wound complications, and muscle flap reconstruction should be considered when possible. Prolonged survival can be achieved in some patients following salvage resection for epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal.