Attitudes toward the genetic testing of children among adults in a Utah-based kindred tested for a BRCA1 mutation

Advances in molecular biology and genetics have led to the identification of the breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, along with tests to detect mutations in these genes. Although the appropriateness of BRCA1/2 genetic testing for children has been debated in the literature, little is known about the attitudes of individuals who have undergone cancer susceptibility testing. The present study focused on attitudes toward BRCA1 testing for children among 218 adults from a Utah-based kindred who had received BRCA1 test results. Results indicated that approximately one-fourth of the participants would permit BRCA1 testing for children under the age of 18. General attitudes about genetic testing were predictive of attitudes toward the testing of children. In addition, men and individuals without a BRCA1 mutation were more likely to agree that minors should be allowed BRCA1 testing. Individuals whose mother had been affected with breast cancer were less likely to permit testing for minors. Among parents of minor children, less than one-fifth indicated that they would want BRCA1 testing for their own children; carrier status was not predictive of attitudes toward testing their own children. As breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility testing continues to be disseminated into clinical settings, there may be an increase in the number of test requests for minors. The findings of the present study represent an important step in exploring attitudes about genetic testing of children among individuals who have received cancer susceptibility test results.     

Patient satisfaction and cancer‐related distress among unselected Jewish women undergoing genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2

Metcalfe KA, Poll A, Llacuachaqui M, Nanda S, Tulman A, Mian N, Sun P, Narod SA. Patient satisfaction and cancer‐related distress among unselected Jewish women undergoing genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2. It is not known to what extent participation in a genetic testing program for BRCA1 and BRCA2, which does not include an extensive pre‐test counselling session, influences cancer‐related distress, cancer risk perception and patient satisfaction. Unselected Jewish women in Ontario were offered genetic testing for three common Jewish BRCA mutations. Before testing and 1‐year post‐testing, the women completed questionnaires which assessed cancer‐related distress, cancer risk perception, and satisfaction. A total of 2080 women enrolled in the study; of these, 1516 (73%) completed a 1‐year follow‐up questionnaire. In women with a BRCA mutation, the mean breast cancer risk perception increased from 41.1% to 59.6% after receiving a positive genetic test result (p = 0.002). Among non‐carriers, breast cancer risk perception decreased slightly, from 35.8% to 33.5% (p = 0.08). The mean level of cancer‐related distress increased significantly for women with a BRCA mutation, but did not change in women without a mutation; 92.8% expressed satisfaction with the testing process. The results of this study suggest that the majority of Jewish women who took part in population genetic screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 were satisfied with the delivery of genetic testing and would recommend testing to other Jewish women. However, women with a BRCA mutation experienced increased levels of cancer‐related distress.     

Perceptions of Ashkenazi Jewish breast cancer patients on genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2

The perceived benefits and risks of genetic testing may vary between groups of individuals with different cultural, demographic, and family history features. This multicentre study examined the factors that influenced the decision to undergo genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Canadian Jewish women with breast cancer. A self-administered questionnaire was developed and distributed to 134 individuals enrolled in a research-based testing program for Ashkenazi women. The questionnaire assessed demographic, social, and family history parameters, and the influence of medical, family, social, psychological, and cultural/religious factors on decision making about genetic testing. Seventy-six percent of women completed the questionnaire. Forty-one percent of study participants had no family history of breast or ovarian cancer. The most important factors influencing the decision to undergo testing were a desire to contribute to research, potential benefit to other family members, curiosity, and the potential for relief if not found to be a carrier (endorsed by 87, 78, 70, and 60% of participants, respectively). The main perceived risks of undergoing genetic testing related to insurance discrimination, confidentiality, accuracy and interpretability of results, potential impact on marriage prospects for family members, and focus on the Jewish community (endorsed by 28, 24, 30, 17, and 14% of participants, respectively). This study provides novel information on the motivating factors for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing in Canadian women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent. The focus on altruistic factors and those related to perceived psychological benefits of testing is notable.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing in Cyprus; a population based study

This paper presents the largest study in Cyprus evaluating the frequency and distribution of BRCA1/2 mutations in a high risk patient cohort. Deleterious mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes were identified in 68 of the 527 patients tested (13%). It is of interest that a quarter of those tested positive, did not have an extensive family history of breast/ovarian cancer but were diagnosed with early onset breast cancer, ovarian cancer under the age of 60 or triple negative breast cancer. The spectrum of mutations identified in our patient cohort is different compared to other Mediterranean countries. Furthermore, several of the mutations detected are novel and have not been identified in other ethnic populations. This highlights the importance of operating a national reference center for cancer genetic diagnosis which offers services tailored to the needs of the Cypriot population.     

Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the Province of Ontario

In 2001, genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 was introduced in Ontario, for women at high‐risk of breast or ovarian cancer. To date over 30,000 individuals have been tested throughout Ontario. Testing was offered to all Ontario residents who were eligible under any of 13 criteria. We report the results of tests conducted at Mount Sinai Hospital from 2007 to 2014. A total of 4726 individuals were tested, 764 (16.2%) were found to carry a pathogenic variant (mutation). Among 3684 women and men who underwent testing without a known familial BRCA mutation, 331 (9.0%) were found to carry a mutation. Among 1042 women and men tested for a known family mutation, 433 (41.6%) were positive. There were 603 female mutation carriers, of these, 303 were affected with breast or ovarian cancer (50%) and 16 with another cancer (2.3%). Of 284 unaffected female carriers, 242 (85%) were tested for a known family mutation and 42 (15%) were the first person in the family to be tested. By placing greater emphasis on recruiting unaffected female relatives of known mutation carriers for testing, greater than one‐half of newly identified carriers will be unaffected.     

Strategies for recruitment of relatives of BRCA mutation carriers to a genetic testing program in the Bahamas

The prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among unselected breast cancer patients in the Bahamas is 23%. It is beneficial to advise relatives of mutation carriers that they are candidates for genetic testing. Women who test positive are then eligible for preventive interventions, such as oophorectomy. It is not clear how often relatives of women with a mutation in the Bahamas wish to undergo genetic testing for the family mutation. Furthermore, it is not clear how best to communicate this sensitive information to relatives in order to maximize patient compliance. We offered genetic testing to 202 first‐degree relatives of 58 mutation carriers. Of 159 women who were contacted by the proband or other family member, only 14 made an appointment for genetic testing (9%). In contrast, among 32 relatives who were contacted directly by the genetic counselor, 27 came for an appointment (84%). This study suggests that for recruitment of relatives in the Bahamas, direct contact by counselor is preferable to using the proband as an intermediary.     

Estimating survival rates after ovarian cancer among women tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

Several studies have reported that women with ovarian cancer and a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations have better survival than women with ovarian cancer and no mutation. Potential reasons for this include possible differences in histologic subtype, stage, grade and response to chemotherapy, but some of the difference in survival may be due to systematic bias, i.e. a difference in survival rates for women who do and who do not undergo genetic testing. We estimated the survival rate in 1423 ovarian cancer patients from Ontario who had genetic testing and compared this with the survival rate for all 3367 ovarian cancer patients from the province from whom the tested sample was derived. Tested women had a 10‐year survival of 54.5%, compared to 35.8% for all patients in the province. We evaluated the extent to which three different methods of adjustment eliminated the observed difference. The adjusted rates for the tested cohort were closer to the provincial average, but each adjustment method resulted in a modest over‐estimate of 10‐year survival, ranging from 6.1% to 10.0%. The mortality advantage for tested women was due, in part, to a lower than expected mortality rate of tested women in the period following genetic testing.     

Development and testing of a decision aid for breast cancer prevention for women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation

For women who carry a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2, the risk of breast cancer is up to 87% by the age of 70. There are options available to reduce the risk of breast cancer; however, each option has both risks and benefits, which makes decision making difficult. The objective is to develop and pilot test a decision aid for breast cancer prevention for women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. The decision aid was developed and evaluated in three stages. In the first stage, the decision aid was developed and reviewed by cancer genetics experts. The second stage was a review of the decision aid by women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation for acceptability and feasibility. The final stage was a pre-test--post-test evaluation of the decision aid. Twenty-one women completed the pre-test questionnaire and 20 completed the post-test questionnaire. After using the decision aid, there was a significant decline in mean decisional conflict scores (p = 0.001), a significant improvement in knowledge scores (p = 0.004), and fewer women uncertain about prophylactic mastectomy (p = 0.003) and prophylactic oophorectomy (p = 0.009). Use of the decision aid decreased decisional conflict to levels suggestive of implementation of a decision. In addition, knowledge levels increased and choice predisposition changed with fewer women being uncertain about each option. This has significant clinical implications as it implies that with greater uptake of cancer prevention options by women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, fewer women will develop and/or die of hereditary breast cancer.     

Systematic review of the empirical investigation of resources to support decision-making regarding BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing in women with breast cancer

Objective

Identify existing resources developed and/or evaluated empirically in the published literature designed to support women with breast cancer making decisions regarding genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations.

The risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers without a first‐degree relative with breast cancer

The objective of this study was to estimate the lifetime risk of breast cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation with and without at least 1 first‐degree relative with breast cancer. A total of 2835 women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were followed. Age‐ and gene‐specific breast cancer rates were calculated. The relative risks of breast cancer for subjects with a family history of breast cancer, compared to no family history were calculated. The mean age at baseline was 41.1 years, and they were followed for a mean of 6.0 years. The estimated penetrance of breast cancer to age 80 years was 60.8% for BRCA1 and 63.1% for BRCA2. For all BRCA carriers, the penetrance of breast cancer to age 80 for those with no first‐degree relative with breast cancer was 60.4% and 63.3% for those with at least 1 first‐degree relative with breast cancer. The risk of breast cancer for BRCA carriers with no first‐degree relative with breast cancer is substantial, and as a result, clinical management for these women should be the same as those for women with an affected relative.     

All in the family: Evaluation of the process and content of sisters' communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results

Despite the potential importance of family communication, little is known about the process and content of communicating BRCA1/2 test results to relatives. The objectives of this observational study were to describe the process and content of communicating BRCA1/2 test results to sisters, and to evaluate whether the proband's carrier status influenced communication outcomes. Participants were 43 women who were the first family member to have genetic testing (probands). Probands reported on communication outcomes for 81 sisters. Process and content variables were evaluated 1‐month after receipt of BRCA1/2 test results using the Family Communication Questionnaire (FCQ). Overall, BRCA1/2 test results were communicated to 85% of sisters, and carriers communicated their results to significantly more sisters compared to uninformative (96% vs. 76%, FET = 0.02). The most important reason for communicating results was to provide genetic risk information; however, compared to uninformatives, carriers communicated their results to significantly more sisters to obtain emotional support (74%) and to get advice about medical decisions (42%) (FET = 0.001). Carriers also discussed the possibility of discrimination and recommendations for cancer management with significantly more sisters. Among sisters to whom BRCA1/2 test results were not communicated, the most important reason for not sharing test results was because of emotionally distant relationships. The results of this study suggest that probands are likely to quickly communicate their BRCA1/2 test results to relatives and that although needs for social support may motivate family communication, emotionally distant relationships may be a barrier to communication with relatives. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Androgen receptor expression in breast cancer patients tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

Pristauz G, Petru E, Stacher E, Geigl J B, Schwarzbraun T, Tsybrovskyy O, Winter R & Moinfar F
(2010) Histopathology 57, 877–884 Androgen receptor expression in breast cancer patients tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations Aim: To assess the expression of receptors for androgen (AR), oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) as well as human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (Her‐2/neu) status of breast carcinomas in breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and BRCA1/2 negative tested women. Methods: One hundred and thirty‐five breast cancers in women tested for BRCA1/2 mutations. Screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations was performed by direct sequencing of all BRCA1 and BRCA2 exons as well as the surrounding intronic sequences. Additionally, BRCA genes were analysed with multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification. Consecutive paraffin sections were examined immunhistochemically for AR, ER, PR and Her‐2/neu. Results: Of the 135 tumours, 43 (32%) were BRCA1‐related, 18 (13%) were BRCA2‐related and 74 (55%) were BRCA1/2‐negative. Seventy‐two per cent of the BRCA1‐related, 22% of the BRCA2‐related and 12% of the BRCA1/2‐negative tumours were triple (ER, PR, Her2neu)‐negative. Eighty‐four per cent of BRCA1 mutated cancers were high‐grade (G3) tumours. ARs were expressed in 30% (13 of 43) of BRCA1‐related, in 78% (14 of 18) in BRCA2‐related tumours and in 76% (56 of 74) in BRCA1/2 negative tumours. Twenty‐one per cent of ER‐negative BRCA1‐related tumours expressed androgen receptors. Conclusion: Approximately one in five BRCA1 mutated breast cancers negative for ER and PR express androgen receptors. Modulation of AR might open a new avenue for treating these high‐risk cancers.     

Prevalence of founder mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes among unaffected women from the Bahamas

Population‐based testing for BRCA1/2 mutations detects a high proportion of carriers not identified by cancer family history‐based testing. We sought to determine whether population‐based testing is an effective approach to genetic testing in the Bahamas, where 23% of women with breast cancer carry one of seven founder mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. We determined the prevalence of founder BRCA mutations in 1847 Bahamian women without a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer, unselected for age or family history. We found that 2.8% (20/705) of unaffected women with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer and 0.09% (1/1089) of unaffected women without a family history carry a BRCA mutation. A total of 38% of unaffected women with a known mutation in the family were found to carry the familial mutation. We previously suggested that all Bahamian women with breast or ovarian cancer be offered genetic testing. These current data suggest that additionally all unaffected Bahamian women with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer should be offered genetic testing for the founder BRCA mutations.     

Peritoneal washing is an adequate source for somatic BRCA1/2 mutation testing in ovarian malignancies

Genetic screening for BRCA mutations should be offered to all women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and/or peritoneal cancers given the implications for treatment options and cancer risk assessments. Yet, while germline breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) and breast cancer susceptibility gene 2 (BRCA2) testing is commonly performed, BRCA1/2 somatic mutations testing is rather challenging since the poor quality of DNA extracted from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples can significantly impair this process. Peritoneal lavage is routinely performed in surgeries of suspected ovarian malignancies. We have analyzed fresh tumor, peritoneal lavage and blood samples from ten patients and we have found an excellent agreement (88%) between fresh tumor and peritoneal lavage for BRCA mutation testing. Importantly, 112 of the 114 genomic alterations detected in fresh tumor samples were also found in peritoneal lavage fluids. Our data suggest that peritoneal washings can indeed streamline BRCA genes mutation testing procedures.     

Removing the shadow of the law from the debate about genetic testing of children

When physicians view efforts to obtain genetic testing for children as unwise or contrary to the children's interests, they face difficult problems both of ethics and of communicating with the parents. Contrary to the suggestions of some, the law has little to say about how physicians resolve these dilemmas. Parents do not have a constitutionally protected right to demand that unwilling physicians perform these tests. In addition, there is little risk of liability for damages unless the child suffers physical harm as a result of the physician's refusal to do the test. The debate about genetic testing of children needs to take place with a clear understanding of the law's limited impact. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Comparison of proactive and usual approaches to offering predictive testing for BRCA1/2 mutations in unaffected relatives

There have been few studies addressing uptake of predictive testing for BRCA1/2 , only one comparing a proactive with usual family networking approach to dissemination. We report uptake of predictive genetic testing after directly offering BRCA1 presymptomatic genetic testing to 100 individuals in two generations of 5 large BRCA1 families compared with service testing of 196 families since that time. Uptake was significantly higher in the first generation (group 1), who were directly offered testing, and much higher in females. Seventy-four percent of unaffected women in the first generation proceeded to testing, 42% of men. This decreased to 44% of women in the second generation (group 2) and 9% males (p = 0.0003). Uptake in unaffected individuals in the final group (group 3) with no proactive approach was significantly lower than that in the first group. Overall uptake after 10 years was 56% (95% confidence interval, CI, 50–62%) for group 1 and 36% (95% CI 34.3–37.7%) for 1084 group 3 individuals (p = 0.0003). Among women, uptake was 74% (95% CI 67–81%) in group 1 at 10 years compared with 51.5% (95% CI 49–54%) in 552 group 3 women (p = 0.023). In men, uptake was 42% (95% CI 33–52%) in group 1 and 21.1% (95% CI 18.1–23.1%) among 532 men in group 3 (p = 0.0098). Although these results are not from a randomized trial, they show particularly among men a substantially higher uptake of genetic services with a direct approach. Importance should be given to more proactive approaches to ensure that men in BRCA1/2 -positive families receive the appropriate information.     

Ethical issues in susceptibility genetic testing for late‐onset neurodegenerative diseases

Genome‐wide association studies have revolutionized our understanding of the genetic architecture of complex traits and diseases over the last decade. This knowledge is enabling clinicians, researchers, and direct‐to‐consumer genetics companies to conduct disease susceptibility testing based on powerful methods such as polygenic risk scoring. However, these technologies raise a set of complex ethical, legal, social, and policy considerations. Here we review and discuss a series of ethical dilemmas associated with susceptibility genetic testing for the two most common late‐onset neurodegenerative diseases, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, including testing in asymptomatic individuals. Among others, these include informed consent, disclosure of results and unexpected findings, mandatory screening, privacy and confidentiality, and stigma and genetic discrimination. Importantly, appropriate counseling is a deciding factor for the ethical soundness of genetic testing, which poses a challenge for the regulation of these tests and the training of healthcare professionals. As genetic knowledge about these diseases continues growing and genetic testing becomes more widespread, it is increasingly important to raise awareness among researchers, medical practitioners, genetic counselors, and decision makers about the ethical, legal, and social issues associated with genetic testing for polygenic diseases.     

Association between temporal orientation and attitudes about BRCA1/2 testing among women of African descent with family histories of breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have identified specific attitudes (pros and cons) about BRCA testing held by women of African descent that are associated with decisions to participate in testing. These testing attitudes may be determined, in part, by temporal orientation, or how one perceives the significance of events and the consequences of their actions in terms of past, present, and future. The current study explored the relationship between temporal orientation and pros and cons of BRCA testing among 140 women of African descent with a family history suggestive of a genetic mutation predisposing to breast cancer. METHODS: Participants completed measures of temporal orientation and genetic testing attitudes. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses indicated that future orientation was positively associated with perceived pros of testing. Additional analyses revealed significant associations between temporal orientation and specific item subsets related to the negative and positive impact of testing on family and personal control over one's health. CONCLUSION: These results support an association between temporal orientation and attitudes about BRCA testing among women of African descent with family histories of breast cancer. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Findings support exploration of temporal orientation in future research on BRCA testing decisions among women of African descent and this construct's importance in developing decision aids and tailoring genetic counseling.     

Recurrent BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in ovarian cancer: a founder mutation of BRCA1 identified in the Chinese population

Previous mutational analysis for BRCA gene mutations in sporadic ovarian cancer occurring in Chinese patients in Hong Kong identified six germline BRCA1 mutations and one germline BRCA2 mutation, six of which were novel (Khoo et al., 2000). Knowledge of BRCA gene mutations in the Chinese population is relatively scant. In this study, we focussed on whether any of these mutations could be recurrent in our Chinese population, making use of archival paraffin embedded tissue. A consecutive series of 214 ovarian cancer cases, half of Southern Chinese origin from Hong Kong whilst the other half of Northern Chinese origin from Beijing were used for the study. We identified one further novel mutation, 1081delG, in BRCA1. This was found to occur in two unrelated individuals with shared haplotype as revealed by allelotype analysis, thus demonstrating founder effect. Two other recurrent mutations were also identified, the 2371-2372delTG mutation in BRCA1 and the 3337C>T mutation in BRCA2 recurring in two and three unrelated individuals respectively, giving an overall prevalence 4.7% of recurrent BRCA mutations in ovarian cancer in the Southern Chinese population. Most importantly, all our recurrent mutation carriers were identified from Southern Chinese patients from Hong Kong whilst such mutations were absent in samples from the Northern Chinese. Our findings indicate possible heterogeneity in the BRCA genotype between Northern and Southern Chinese. The identification of a founder mutation and two recurrent mutations moreover, has important implications towards screening strategies for breast and ovarian cancer among Chinese of southern ancestral origin who are now dispersed throughout the world.     

Parental origin of mutation and the risk of breast cancer in a prospective study of women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation

The objective is to estimate the risk of breast cancer in women who carry a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, according to parental origin of mutation. We conducted a cohort study of women with a BRCA1 mutation (n = 1523) or BRCA2 mutation (n = 369) who had not been diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer. For each woman, the pedigree was reviewed and the origin of the mutation was assigned as probable paternal or maternal. The hazard ratio (HR) for developing breast cancer in the follow‐up period was estimated for women with a paternal mutation compared to a maternal mutation. The risk of breast cancer was modestly higher in women with a paternal BRCA1 mutation compared to women with a maternal BRCA1 mutation (HR = 1.46; 95% CI = 0.99–2.16) but the difference was not significant (p = 0.06). The parental mutation origin did not affect the risk in women with a BRCA2 mutation. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that there is an increased risk of breast cancer among women with a paternally inherited BRCA1 mutation compared to a maternally inherited mutation. However, the data are not sufficiently compelling to justify different screening recommendations for the two subgroups.