Chronic dysimmune neuropathies: Beyond chronic demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

The spectrum of chronic dysimmune neuropathies has widened well beyond chronic demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Pure motor (multifocal motor neuropathy), sensorimotor with asymmetrical involvement (multifocal acquired demylinating sensory and motor neuropathy), exclusively distal sensory (distal acquired demyelinating sensory neuropathy) and very proximal sensory (chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy) constitute the variants of CIDP. Correct diagnosis of these entities is of importance in terms of initiation of appropriate therapy as well as prognostication of these patients. The rates of detection of immune-mediated neuropathies with monoclonal cell proliferation (monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance, multiple myeloma, etc.) have been facilitated as better diagnostic tools such as serum immunofixation electrophoresis are being used more often. Immune neuropathies associated with malignancies and systemic vasculitic disorders are being defined further and treated early with better understanding of the disease processes. As this field of dysimmune neuropathies will evolve in the future, some of the curious aspects of the clinical presentations and response patterns to different immunosuppressants or immunomodulators will be further elucidated. This review also discusses representative case studies.     

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies and their variants

The Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathies (CIDP) constitute a syndrome whose incidence is difficult to evaluate, and is probably underestimated. In the course of this presentation, we deliberately restricted discussion to issues raised in recent years concerning the extent of this syndrome. We discuss diagnostic criteria, especially electrophysiological ones. As the criteria proposed by the ad hoc committee of the American Academy of Neurology in 1991 have been questioned due to lack of sensitivity, new ones have been proposed recently. We briefly discuss the different types of chronic dysimmune demyelinating neuropathy: not only the CIDP, but also the Lewis and Sumner syndrome or multifocal inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy and the multiple conduction block neuropathies. At last, we point out the consistent finding of axonal involvement in the course of a chronic demyelinating neuropathy; over time, it can become predominant, which may make diagnosis difficult by suggesting a chronic axonal neuropathy that may be assumed to be primary. Consideration of these points may help clinicians recognize more chronic dysimmune neuropathies, for which immunosuppressive therapy has been found to be effective.     

Ultrasound and MRI of nerves for monitoring disease activity and treatment effects in chronic dysimmune neuropathies – Current concepts and future directions

New imaging modalities like high-resolution-ultrasound (HRUS) and MR-Neurography (MRN) are increasingly used for the evaluation of the peripheral nervous system. The increasing knowledge on morphological changes observed in different neuropathies has led to a better understanding of underlying pathophysiological processes.The diagnosis of acquired chronic dysimmune neuropathies (CDN) like chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), Lewis-Sumner Syndrome (LSS) or multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) can be challenging. The current diagnostic criteria and outcome parameters are mainly based on clinical and electrophysiological parameters. Especially in CDN cases with atypical presentation or during early disease stages, the diagnostic accuracy is low and standardized protocols for the evaluation of disease activity and treatment response are lacking.The establishment of combined diagnostic criteria for CDN including imaging modalities could help to improve the diagnostic accuracy, allow a better differentiation of subtypes and facilitate the follow-up of disease course. The appropriate selection of eligible patients and sensitive monitoring of treatment response is mandatory future in treatment trials.In this article, we briefly summarize the clinical presentations and pathophysiological concepts of different CDN like CIDP, LSS and MMN. Furthermore, this review focuses on the diagnostic value of HRUS/MRN and its potential role for the monitoring of disease activity.     

Diagnosis of atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a practical overview based on some case studies

Background: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare disease and the diagnosis is complicated by heterogeneity of the variant forms. Underdiagnosis is undesirable as effective treatments exist. Conversely, overdiagnosis can lead to inappropriate and expensive treatment and delay the initiation of appropriate treatment. Summary: The European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) diagnostic criteria are used widely in clinical trials and clinical practice. A limitation of the criteria is the requirement for at least one demyelinating parameter as there are certain situations (e.g. proximally located demyelinating process, secondary axonal loss, predominant involvement of sensory fibers) where this criterion may be not apparent; this can lead to misclassification of the neuropathy as axonal. To prevent this situation, the French CIDP Study Group has proposed a set of clinical and electrophysiological signs that are atypical for chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy and suggestive for CIDP. Greater use of supportive diagnostic tools such as magnetic resonance imaging in clinical practice is not only extending the boundaries of CIDP but also contributing to over-representation of some variants, such as those involving the plexus, and sensory or minimal forms of CIDP. Many misdiagnoses can be avoided by adapting the diagnostic strategy to the clinical phenotype of CIDP. Key Messages: Early and accurate diagnosis of CIDP facilitates the selection of appropriate therapy to improve prognosis. Understanding the limitations of diagnostic criteria and adapting the diagnostic strategy to clinical phenotype can enhance precision and avoid diagnostic pitfalls.     

Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbosacral Roots in the Dysimmune Inflammatory Polyneuropathies

The diagnosis of acute Guillain-Barre syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy is based on clinical characteristics, abnormalities on nerve conduction studies, and nerve biopsy specimens indicating demyelination. Inflammation and edema are also common findings in nerve specimens Immunotherapy is helpful in these dysimmune conditions. Occasionally the diagnosis is difficult to make, particularly when electrophysiological testing or nerve biopsy findings are not characteristic. The authors found contrast enhancement of lumbosacral roots in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and Guillain-Barre syndrome, but not m those with other demyelinating neuropathies. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging could be a useful tool in the diagnosis of the dysimmune inflammatory neuropathies.     

Class II antigen expression in peripheral neuropathies.

The expression of class II antigen was studied in sural nerve biopsies from patients with peripheral neuropathies. These included patients with chronic demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), non-immune mediated neuropathies of diverse etiologies and controls without evidence of neuropathy. The major finding in CIDP was a marked increase in class II expression on Schwann cells. Endoneurial Schwann cell staining to the same degree as in CIDP was seen in diabetic symmetric proximal motor neuropathy, neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathies and hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 1. In the control nerves and the other non-immune mediated neuropathies class II expression was mainly restricted to endothelial and perineurial cells. Increased endoneurial expression of class II antigen was found to correlate with elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein levels but not with other clinical variables or demyelination as defined by electrophysiologic criteria or teased fiber analysis. The increased expression of class II antigen on Schwann cells may be indicative of a breakdown in immunological tolerance but should not be used as a diagnostic marker for dysimmune neuropathies due to overlap with non-immune mediated neuropathies.     

Differential diagnosis of chronic dysimmune demyelinating polyneuropathies with and without anti-MAG antibodies

The distinction between chronic demyelinating polyneuropathies associated with IgM paraproteinemia and anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) antibodies (MAG-PN) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathies (CIDPs) relies on the anti-MAG antibodies assay. The aim of the study was to identify clinical and electrophysiological features suggesting a diagnosis of MAG-PN. Fourteen patients with MAG-PN and 35 with CIDP were included, and a discriminant analysis was performed to identify the clinical and electrophysiological features suggestive of MAG-PN. Pure sensory clinical phenotype, low median and ulnar terminal latency index, and absence of M responses in the lower limbs were significantly associated with the diagnosis of MAG-PN, and indicate a moderate to large increase in probability of this diagnosis in patients with chronic dysimmune demyelinating polyneuropathies.     

Changes in the assessment of peripheral neuropathy in the last decade

In the past ten years, clinical evaluation of peripheral neuropathy has greatly improved, thanks to the development and validation of new evaluation tools. Notably, new functional scales that may be used in clinical trials as well as in daily practice have emerged. This evolution is remarkable, but will necessitate considerable efforts from Neurologists in their clinical practice. In the field of electrophysiological examination, techniques have not evolved as much in the past ten years. However, interpretation of abnormal results leading to the diagnosis of immune mediated peripheral neuropathies has improved, allowing the development of new rationales for diagnostic strategies.     

The extent of the clinical manifestations of chronic polyradiculoneuropathy

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy is an autoimmune disease that target myelin sheats of peripheral nerves. Its diagnosis is often difficult to make, and a number of cases are probably not identified because of the clinical heterogeneity. Numerous sets of diagnostic criteria have sought to define CIDP but clinical criteria are generally not detailed. OBJECTIVES: To review the main clinical characteristics suggestive of CIDP (that means not compatible with a length-dependent axonal process) and the critical clinical points of the neuropathy which make the differential diagnosis with the main other forms of chronic auto immune neuropathy sometimes difficult. RESULTS: The main clinical characteristic are: a symmetric proximal and distal motor weakness predominantly affecting the lower limbs, a diffuse areflexia, a sensory deficit characterized by a preferential involvement of large fibers, an evolution which may be either chronic progressive or recurrent. These aspects raise many questions concerning overlap with other inflammatory neuropathies such as Guillain Barre syndrome, Lewis-Sumner neuropathy, chronic ataxic neuropathy. The distinction of a subgroup of CIDP associated with other diseases such as diabetes or HIV are also controversial. CONCLUSION: The growing body of knowledge on the pathogenesis of CIDP and clinical or electrophysiological differentiation of subforms may help to develop more effective therapies for CIDP in the next few years.     

Polymorphisms of CD1 genes in chronic dysimmune neuropathies

CD1 are MCH-like glycoproteins specialized in capturing and presenting glycolipid to T cells. Expression of CD1 molecules has been observed on endoneurial machrophages in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and vasculitis and polymorphisms of CID1A and CD1E genes have been associated with susceptibility to develop Guillain-Barré syndrome. In 46 patients with CIDP, in 13 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy and in 132 controls we genotyped exon 2 of CD1A and CD1E genes. We found no association between chronic dysimmune neuropathies, with or without anti-ganglioside antibodies, and polymorphisms of CD1A and CD1E genes.     

Histopathological features of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) was proposed by Dyck et al. in 1975. Diagnosis was based mainly on nerve biopsy features with segmental demyelination, onion bulb formation and inflammatory infiltrates. In many pathological studies, frequencies of these features of CIDP were not observed in the same percentages. Limitations on the nerve biopsy were explained by the study of small, distal, only sensory nerve specimens in the lower limb. In recent years, the usefulness of nerve biopsy has been reconsidered. If electron microscopy and teased-fiber studies are used, the examination can recognize CIDP erroneously classified as chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy. Therapeutic options should be guided by suggestive abnormalities of demyelination and or inflammation on nerve biopsy even in the presence of a electrophysiologic axonal pattern.     

Diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in clinical practice: A survey among Dutch neurologists

The diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is often a challenge. The clinical presentation is diverse, accurate biomarkers are lacking, and the best strategy to initiate and maintain treatment is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine how neurologists diagnose and treat CIDP. We conducted a cross‐sectional survey on diagnostic and treatment practices among Dutch neurologists involved in the clinical care of CIDP patients. Forty‐four neurologists completed the survey (44/71; 62%). The respondents indicated to use the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) 2010 CIDP guideline for the diagnosis in 77% and for treatment in 50%. Only 57% of respondents indicated that the presence of demyelinating electrophysiological findings was mandatory to confirm the diagnosis of CIDP. Most neurologists used intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) as first choice treatment, but the indications to start, optimize, or withdraw IVIg, and the use of other immune‐modulatory therapies varied. University‐affiliated respondents used the EFNS/PNS 2010 diagnostic criteria, nerve imaging tools, and immunosuppressive drugs more often. Despite the existence of an international guideline, there is considerable variation among neurologists in the strategies employed to diagnose and treat CIDP. More specific recommendations regarding: (a) the minimal set of electrophysiological requirements to diagnose CIDP, (b) the possible added value of nerve imaging, especially in patients not meeting the electrodiagnostic criteria, (c) the most relevant serological examinations, and (d) the clear treatment advice, in the new EFNS/PNS guideline, would likely support its implementation in clinical practice.     

Distinct cytokine patterns associated with different forms of chronic dysimmune neuropathy

To better understand the presumed immune system dysregulation of chronic dysimmune neuropathy (CDN) patients, we designed a study to evaluate the levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the most common forms of CDN: chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), and anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG)-related polyneuropathy (MAGnp). Sixteen patients fulfilled diagnostic criteria for CIDP, 14 were diagnosed with MAGnp, and 36 were classified as exhibiting "chronic idiopathic polyneuropathy" (CIP). Cytokine production in mitogen-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was analyzed by flow cytometry. CIDP and MAGnp patients were compared with CIP patients, those with monoclonal gammopathy without polyneuropathy (MGUS), and healthy controls (HC). We observed an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines in the CIDP group, whereas interleukin-10 (IL-10) was augmented in the MAGnp patients. These distinctive immune alterations may represent a biological tool in differential diagnosis and future therapeutic approaches.     

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinative polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired neuropathy, presumably of immunological origin. Its clinical presentation and course are extremely variable. CIDP is one of the few peripheral neuropathies amenable to treatment. Typical cases associate progressive or relapsing-remitting motor and sensory deficit with increased CSF protein content and electrophysiological features of demyelination. In other instances the neuropathy is predominantly or exclusively motor or sensory, CSF normal and electrophysiological studies fail to show evidence of demyelination. In such cases conventional diagnostic criteria are not filled yet the patient may respond to immunomodulatory treatments. In this paper we review the diagnostic pitfalls and clinical variants of CIDP to illustrate the problems that may arise. The different therapeutic options are reviewed. Axon loss associated with demyelination is the most important factor of disability and resistance to treatment.     

Diagnostic strategy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Recommendations of the French working group

The diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) requires a careful clinical and neurophysiological evaluation, often completed by CSF analysis. In numerous cases, this diagnosis is straightforward and leads to rapid initiation of an immunomodulatory treatment. However, some patients are not diagnosed because of atypical clinical and/or neurophysiological features, and do not benefit from a potentially effective treatment. In this context, a working group was composed with the task of establishing recommendations on diagnostic strategies for CIDP in the main clinical situations where this diagnosis may be suspected. We have summarized these recommendations and tried to present them in the form of a decision-making algorithm.     

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy or hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy?

The pathological changes generally considered to distinguish chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) from hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (HMSN) are: mononuclear cell infiltrates, prominent endoneurial oedema, and marked fascicle-to-fascicle variability. We evaluated the diagnostic significance of these pathological features which are suggestive of CIDP. Nerve biopsies from 42 dominant HMSN type I cases with a normal disease course were investigated for the occurrence of inflammatory features. A small cluster of mononuclear cells was found in 12% of the cases and marked endoneurial oedema in 21%. Variability in pathology between the fascicles was not observed. The histogram configuration yielded additional information for differential diagnosis. Subsequently, we reviewed the clinical, electrophysiological and morphological features of 18 sporadic cases of chronic progressive demyelinating motor and sensory neuropathy with mainly classic onion bulbs in their nerve biopsies and a disease onset in the first decade. In all these patients DNA investigation for the 17p11.2 duplication was performed. According to the results of the DNA investigation, autosomal dominant HMSN type Ia was diagnosed in eight patients, although in six slight CIDP-positive features were present. A diagnosis was definite or most probable CIDP in eight patients. In two patients no definite diagnosis could be made. Testing for the presence of the 17p11.2 duplication is, therefore, helpful in distinguishing between CIDP and HMSN type I. The diagnosis of CIDP requires careful evaluation of the clinical, electrophysiological and morphological data to avoid false-positive diagnoses of inflammatory disorders.     

急性和慢性多发性周围神经病的电生理及形态学观察

目的寻找神经、肌肉电生理和腓肠神经病理在急性和慢性炎性脱髓鞘性多发性周围神经病(GBS和CIDP)的诊断价值。方法总结GBS和CIDP(15例和17例)的临床、电生理及病理资料进行回顾性分析。结果EMG异常而神经电生理正常共8例;临床和电生理均未提示感觉异常的患者病理发现髓鞘和轴突的丧失、髓鞘再生及许旺细胞内结构改变。结论腓肠神经活检及神经、肌电生理的测定是本组疾病相辅相成的辅助检查手段。     

Involvement of the peripheral nervous system in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis is a demyelinating disease limited to the central nervous system, but the literature has provided recurring evidence which raises the question of associated peripheral nervous system abnormalities. The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy during multiple sclerosis remains controversial without prospective study. Nevertheless, some data have reported well documented case reports describing the co-occurrence of multiple sclerosis and radiculopathy or mononeuropathy or polyneuropathy in the same patients. By contrast, more frequent subtle nerve abnormalities may be found by using electrophysiological and neuropathological examinations. Some hypotheses have been proposed by Waxman to decipher the electrophysiological and neuropathological findings. The mechanisms for demyelinating disease and peripheral nerve pathophysiology may imply the antigenic properties or the presence of diffusing factors between peripheral nervous system and central nervous system myelin and the molecular plasticity of myelinated fibers.     

Polyneuropathies in teenagers: a clinicopathological study of 45 cases

The aim of the present study was to investigate the causes of polyneuropathy in teenagers and to describe some characteristic clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological and pathological features. Forty-five patients with peripheral nervous disorders aged 13-19 were studied. Hereditary polyneuropathy of different types was diagnosed in 28 patients (62%); nine showed chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and two showed vasculitic neuropathy. In two more cases polyneuropathy was attributed to toxic agents, while among the rest, one was diagnosed as metachromatic leucodystrophy (juvenile type), one as adrenoleucodystrophy, one as porphyric neuropathy and one as Fabry disease. The high incidence of hereditary neuropathies in teenagers differs from that in adults, but is similar to that encountered in children. In our study, CIDP appears to be a frequent cause of neuropathy in teenagers, while the other causes are broadly similar to those found in studies concerning children rather than adults.