Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following Femto-LASIK using Goldman applanation tonometry and ocular response analyzer

AIM:To compare intraocular pressure(IOP)measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis(LASIK)with a femtosecond laser for flap creation using ocular response analyzer(ORA)and Goldmann applanation tonometry,and to identify factors that may influence the preoperative and postoperative IOP.METHODS:A prospective study conducted on myopic patients who underwent LASIK using a femtosecond laser for flap fashioning.Enrolled patients were evaluated preoperatively,6 wk and 3 mo postoperatively for manifest refraction(MR),keratometric(K)readings and central corneal thickness(CCT)using a scheimpflug-based topography.Corneal resistance factor(CRF),corneal hysteresis(CH),Goldmann correlated IOP(IOPg)and corneal compensated IOP(IOPcc)were measured using ORA besides IOP assessment by Goldman applanation tonometry(GAT).RESULTS:There was a statistically significant decrease in measures of IOPg by 3.35±0.83 mm Hg,followed by GAT which decreased by 2.2±0.44 mm Hg,and the least affected by operation was IOPcc which decreased only by 0.87±0.1 mm Hg after 6 wk.After 3 mo follow up there was a statistically significant decrease in IOPcc which decreased only by 0.76±0.4 mm Hg,followed by IOP GAT by 1.6±0.5 mm Hg,and the most affected by operation was IOPg which decreased by 2.3±0.3 mm Hg.Correspondingly,there was a statistically significant decrease in CH and CRF after 6 wk and 3 mo.At 3 mo,the preoperative MR and preoperative GAT were prominent significant predictors of the postoperative GAT changes.The prediction equation was subsumed.CONCLUSION:IOP measurements and corneal biomechanical factors reduce significantly after LASIK with a femtosecond laser for flap creation.The IOPcc values are less influenced by changes in corneal properties than IOPg and GAT,indicating that IOPcc may provide the most reliable measurement of IOP after this procedure.     

Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese.

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) obtained from the ocular response analyzer (ORA) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) on a group of normal Chinese. METHODS: One hundred twenty-five normal subjects were recruited, with one eye randomly selected for this study. Each eye was measured first with the noncontact tonometer ORA, followed by the GAT and ultrasound pachometry, in a randomized order. Four readings were obtained from the ORA, and three measurements were taken with the GAT. The mean was used for analysis. The ORA provided a Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg) and a corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc). Three central corneal thickness (CCT) values were measured using an ultrasound pachometer, and the mean was used for analysis. RESULTS: IOP obtained from the ORA was similar to that from the GAT (IOPg minus GAT: mean difference = 0.33 mm Hg, 95% limits of agreement = 4.55 to -4.44 mm Hg; IOPcc minus GAT: mean difference = 0.24 mm Hg, 95% limits of agreement = 4.83 to -5.07 mm Hg). CCT was positively associated with corneal hysteresis (CH) (r2 = 0.30, p < 0.01), corneal resistance factor (r2 = 0.38, p < 0.01), GAT (r2 = 0.09, p < 0.01) and IOPg (r2 = 0.16, p < 0.01). IOPcc was not associated with CCT (r2 = 0.01, p = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Both IOPg and IOPcc have good agreement with GAT on normal subjects. The influence of CCT on IOPcc was insignificant.     

Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry

PURPOSE: To compare the preoperative and postoperative measurement of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), the ocular response analyzer (ORA), and the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (PDCT) in eyes undergoing myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial. METHODS: IOP was measured in 66 myopic eyes before and after LASIK by GAT, ORA, and PDCT in a randomized sequence. Metrics of corneal biomechanical properties (corneal hysteresis [CH], corneal resistance factor [CRF], and ocular pulse amplitude [OPA]) were recorded. RESULTS: After LASIK, there was a reduction in mean corneal pachymetry of 90.2 mum and in IOP measurements with GAT (Delta = -1.8 +/- 2.8 mm Hg; P < .01), ORA-Goldmann (Delta = -4.6 +/- 2.8 mm Hg, P < .01), and ORA-corneal compensated (Delta - 2.1 +/- 2.6 mm Hg; P < .05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative IOP measurements taken by PDCT (Delta = -0.5 +/- 2.6 mm Hg). Postoperatively, CRF decreased by 28.6% (P < .01), CH by 16.2% (P < .01), and OPA by 1.8% (P = .32). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of IOP with PDCT appears to be relatively immune to changes in corneal biomechanics and pachymetry after LASIK, in comparison to GAT and ORA measures of IOP. PDCT and ORA both showed statistically lower variation in measurement than GAT. LASIK produced a marked decline in CH and CRF, which may reflect respective changes in the viscous and elastic qualities of the post-LASIK cornea. In contrast, there was no statistical change in OPA.     

Intraocular pressure measurement after hyperopic LASIK.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) underestimates intraocular pressure (IOP) following photorefractive keratometry (PRK) and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Goldmann applanation tonometry and pneumotonometry (PT) after hyperopic LASIK. METHODS: The IOPs of 20 eyes of 15 patients who underwent hyperopia LASIK were prospectively evaluated. Central and peripheral IOP were measured with GAT and PT, and central and peripheral corneal thicknesses were measured with ultrasonographic pachymetry. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Postoperative GAT measurements of IOP made from the central (13.1+/-2.7 mm Hg) and peripheral (13.9+/-3.3 mm Hg) corneal areas were significantly lower (P <0.001) than central IOP measured preoperatively (17.0+/-2.5 mm Hg). Postoperative PT measurements from the central (17.4+/-3.2 mm Hg) and peripheral (17.6+/-2.9 mm Hg) corneal areas were slightly lower than preoperative central IOP (18.4+/-2.4 mm Hg), but not statistically significant. There were no significant differences between central and peripheral IOP measurements using either method. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate that GAT may underestimate IOP measurement, following hyperopic LASIK.     

Comparation of the new rebound tonometer IOPen and the Goldmann tonometer, and their relationship to corneal properties

Purpose

To compare the intraocular pressures (IOPs) obtained with the IOPen rebound tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and the ocular response analyzer (ORA) and investigate the effects of corneal biomechanical properties on IOPen measurements.

Methods

A total of 198 normal eyes were included in this cross-sectional and randomized study. Three measurements were taken using IOPen. Agreement between tonometers was calculated using the Bland and Altman limits of agreement (LoA) analysis.

Results

The median IOPen IOP was 3 mm Hg below the GAT (P<0.001), 3 mm Hg below the ORA IOP similar to Goldmann (IOPg), and 3 mm Hg below the ORA IOP corrected using corneal parameters (IOPcc)(P<0.01). The LoA width between the IOPen and GAT IOPs varied between 13.92 (mean IOPen IOP) and 15.99 mm Hg (third IOPen measurement). The central corneal thickness (CCT) was unrelated to IOPen measurements (P>0.05). Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal rigidity factor (CRF) were correlated with IOPen and GAT.

Conclusions

IOPen underestimated the IOP compared with GAT and ORA. The effect of measurement quality or measurement order on IOPen was low. CCT did not affect the IOPen, but the CH and CRF did. The LoA width between the IOPen and GAT IOPs was higher than between the ORA IOPg or ORA IOPcc and GAT IOPs.     

LASIK术后角膜生物力学变化与眼压测量值的相关性

目的 观察LASIK术后角膜生物力学参数和眼压测量值的变化及角膜生物力学变化与眼压的相关性。设计 前瞻性病例系列。研究对象 哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院2014年1-12月LASIK手术患者81例（162眼）。方法 应用非接触眼压计（non-contact tonometer,NCT）分别在术前及术后3个月测量眼压。同时应用眼反应分析仪（ocular response analyzer,ORA）测量角膜滞后量（corneal hysteresis,CH）、角膜阻力因子（corneal resistance factor, CRF）、模拟Goldmann 眼压（Goldmann intraocular pressure,IOPg）和角膜补偿眼压（corneal-compensated intraocular pressure,IOPcc）。比较手术前后各参数的变化并分析术后角膜生物力学参数变化与眼压测量值的相关性。 主要指标 手术前后NCT、IOPcc、IOPg、CH、CRF。 结果 LASIK术后3个月CH、CRF、IOPcc、IOPg、NCT测量值与术前比较均显著降低,术后IOPcc与IOPg和NCT之间比较差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）;△CH、△CRF与△IOPcc、△IOPcc- IOPg和△IOPcc-△NCT均成负相关,△CH、△CRF与△IOPg和△NCT均成正相关（P<0.05）;CH和CRF的减少量与眼压测量值下降具有相关性（P<0.05）。结论 LASIK术后角膜生物力学参数和眼压测量值均较术前显著降低,眼压测量值下降与CH和CRF的减少量具有相关性,说明眼压下降的程度可能受角膜生物力学特性的影响。     

FS-LASIK联合胶原交联术后的早期临床观察

目的：探讨飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(femtosecond laser-assisted excimer laser in situ keratomileusis,FS-LASIK)联合胶原交联术后的早期安全性和有效性。

方法：选取2016-07/2017-08我院接受飞秒辅助LASIK联合胶原交联术近视患者30例60眼,分别于术前、术后1、3mo检查裸眼视力。应用角膜地形图(TMS)测量陡峭K值(Ks)、平坦K值(Kf)、角膜规则指数(SRI)、角膜非对称指数(SAI)。眼反应分析仪(ocular response analyzer,ORA)检测角膜补偿眼压(corneal compensated intraocular pressure,IOPcc)、模拟Goldmann眼压(Goldmann correlated IOP value,IOPg)、角膜阻力因子(corneal resistance factor,CRF)、角膜滞后量(corneal hysteresis,CH)。伽利略眼前节分析值包括前后表面屈光度和角膜厚度分布。角膜内皮细胞计数仪器进行内皮计数检查,比较手术前后各指标的差异。

结果：术后1d 26眼(43%)、1mo 55眼(92%)、3mo 50眼(83%)裸眼视力保持0.8以上。术后1mo与术前比较,IOPcc、IOPg、CRF、CH较术前显著降低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。术后3mo与1mo比较,IOPcc、IOPg、CRF、CH值无统计学差异(P>0.05)。角膜地形图参数：术后1mo与术前比较,Ks、Kf显著下降(P<0.01),SRI、SAI显著上升(P<0.01); 术后3mo与1mo比较,Ks有显著升高(P<0.05),Kf变化无统计学差异(P>0.05),SRI、SAI有显著下降(P<0.05)。伽利略眼前节分析中：模拟角膜曲率计陡峭K值(Sim Ks)、模拟角膜曲率计平坦K值(Sim Kf)在3mo较1mo有0.94D和0.95D的增长。另外,前后表面Kf值3mo较1mo明显增加,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01); 而Ks值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。同时,中心点、厚度最薄点,术后3mo与1mo角膜厚度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。角膜内皮计数检查：术前(3059.95±247.87/mm²)与术后1mo(3052.87±267.71/mm²)比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.279,P>0.05)。

结论：屈光角膜手术联合胶原交联术对于度数高和角膜薄、角膜厚度分布不均、地形图异常(除外圆锥角膜)的患者治疗安全有效。     

Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser

BACKGROUND: The Ocular Response Analyser (ORA, Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments) is a non-contact applanation tonometer, providing two measures of intraocular pressure (IOP) - IOPg which represents a Goldmann equivalent IOP measure and IOPcc, representing a measure of IOP independent of corneal effects. In addition, the device provides two measures believed to represent corneal biomechanical properties: corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF). The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability of these measurements. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One randomly chosen eye from 49 healthy volunteers was measured four times consecutively with the ORA prior to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The repeatability coefficient (RC), the coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated as a measure of intrasession repeatability. RESULTS: CH was the most variable and IOPg the most repeatable measure, with an RC of 2.61 and 1.97, respectively, and ICC of 0.86 and 0.92, respectively. CV ranged between 5.73 % for IOPg and 12.38 % for CH. ORA IOP measurements were higher than GAT (IOPcc = 17.43 +/- 3.23; IOPg = 17.53 +/- 3.0; GAT = 15.75 +/- 2.77 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: ORA measurements show good short-term repeatability in normal volunteers. Thus, this device appears to be applicable in clinical practice.     

Corneal biomechanical properties in normal‐tension glaucoma

Purpose: To investigate the intraocular pressure (IOP) and corneal biomechanical properties of normal and normal‐tension glaucoma (NTG) eyes. Methods: This study included 83 normal and 83 NTG eyes. We measured corneal‐compensated IOP (IOPcc), Goldmann‐correlated IOP (IOPg), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal hysteresis (CH) and central corneal thickness (CCT) three times each for normal and NTG eyes using an Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). Results: No significant difference in CCT was seen between normal eyes (541.4 ± 26.8 μm) and NTG eyes (535.4 ± 24.9 μm; p = 0.16). IOPcc was significantly higher in NTG eyes (16.1 ± 2.6 mmHg) than in normal eyes (15.1 ± 2.9 mmHg; p = 0.01), while IOPg was significantly lower in NTG eyes (14.1 ± 2.7 mmHg) than in normal eyes (15.1 ± 3.0 mmHg; p = 0.04). CRF and CH were significantly lower in NTG eyes (CRF, 8.9 ± 1.5 mmHg; CH, 9.2 ± 1.3 mmHg) than in normal eyes (CRF, 10.6 ± 1.4 mmHg; CH, 10.8 ± 1.3 mmHg; p < 0.0001 each). Conclusion: IOPcc was significantly higher in NTG eyes than in normal eyes. The ORA may be useful for distinguishing between the IOPcc of NTG eyes with normal IOP and that of normal eyes. In addition, the ORA enables CRF and CH to be measured in vivo, and weakness of the lamina cribrosa may be clinically inferred from the fact that CRF and CH were reduced in NTG eyes in our study. Low CRF and CH may be clues to the pathology of NTG.     

眼反应分析仪与非接触眼压计眼压测量的对比观察

目的比较眼反应分析仪(ORA)与非接触眼压计(NCT)测量眼压结果的差异,分析ORA、NCT测量结果与角膜中央厚度(CCT)的关系。方法近视患者57例(114只眼),于准分子激光手术前行ORA测量,得出角膜补偿眼压(IOPcc)和Goldmann相关眼压值(IOPg)两个数值,NCT测眼压3次取平均值。结果 ORA测得IOPcc平均值16.85 mm Hg,IOPpg平均值15.26 mm Hg,NCT眼压计测得平均值15.66 mm Hg;IOPcc>NCT>IOPg。IOPcc、IOPg与NCT所测眼压值比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。NCT和IOPg均与CCT呈正相关(r:分别为0.463和0.419,P<0.05);IOPcc与CCT无相关性(r:0.230,P>0.05)。结论 ORA测量屈光不正患者的眼压与NCT测量结果存在一定差异,其中IOPcc不受角膜厚度的影响,在临床运用中准确性较好。     

Pneumotonometry versus Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) versus pneumotonometry in patients after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia. SETTING: Shiley Eye Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. METHODS: In this prospective study, 31 eyes of 17 patients were evaluated before and 1 month after having LASIK for myopia. A masked observer measured preoperative and postoperative IOP by GAT centrally and by pneumotonometry at the center and the periphery of the cornea. Central corneal thickness and curvature were evaluated. RESULTS: Preoperative IOP showed a good correlation between GAT and pneumotonometry values (r = 0.82). Mean postoperative IOP by GAT was lower by 3.8 mm Hg +/- 2.2 (SD) (26.3% +/- 15.2%) than by pneumotonometry: 2.3 +/- 2.8 mm Hg (15.4% +/- 10.7%) (P = .01). There were no statistically significant differences in central IOP versus peripheral IOP measured by pneumotonometry (P = .4). Regression analysis showed no statistically significant differences in IOP as a function of change in corneal thickness or change in corneal curvature with either device. CONCLUSION: Postoperatively, there was a decrease in IOP measured by central GAT that was statstically significant. Differences in pneumotonometry were less substantial, with greater reliability of pneumotonometry than GAT after LASIK.     

Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry

PURPOSE: To analyze the correlation between corneal hysteresis (CH) measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA, Reichert) and ultrasonic corneal central thickness (CCT US) and intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry (IOP GA). SETTING: Bordeaux 2 University, Ophthalmology Department, Bordeaux, France. METHODS: This study comprised 498 eyes of 258 patients. Corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor (CRF), and IOP corneal-compensated (IOPcc) were provided by the ORA device; CCT US and IOP GA were also measured in each eye. The study population was divided into 5 groups: normal (n = 122), glaucoma (n = 159), keratoconus (n = 88), laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (n = 78), and photorefractive keratectomy (n = 39). The Pearson correlation was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Corneal hysteresis was not strongly correlated with IOP or CCT US. The mean CH in the LASIK (8.87 mm Hg) and keratoconus (8.34 mm Hg) groups was lower than in the glaucoma (9.48 mm Hg) and normal (10.26 mm Hg) groups. The lower the CH, the lower its correlation with IOPcc and IOP GA. A CH higher than the CRF was significantly associated with the keratoconus and post-LASIK groups. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal hysteresis, a new corneal parameter, had a moderate dependence on IOP and CCT US. Weaker corneas could be screened with ORA parameters, and low CH could be considered a risk factor for underestimation of IOP. The CCT US should continue to be considered a useful parameter.     

Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer

PURPOSE: To examine corneal hysteresis in children with normal eyes and congenital glaucoma and assess intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer (RORA). DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional study. METHODS: setting: Clinical practice. patients: Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure (Goldmann correlated [IOPg] and corneal compensated [IOPcc]) were recorded with RORA. IOP was also measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. RESULTS: Mean corneal hysteresis of 12.5 mm Hg was recorded in 81 [corrected] normal eyes of 42 children. It was markedly lower (mean 6.3 mm Hg) in 11 eyes of eight children with congenital glaucoma. No correlation was found between age and corneal hysteresis (r = -0.08). IOPg did not differ significantly from Goldmann applanation tonometry (P = .27). IOPcc was statistically significantly greater than IOPg (P = .014). RORA measurement was not possible in the presence of nystagmus but was possible with applanation tonometry. Cooperation with IOP measurement was much higher with RORA (89.8%) compared with applanation tonometry (78.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Corneal hysteresis in children is similar to that reported in adults. No correlation was found with age. In the presence of nystagmus, IOP measurement was possible with Goldmann applanation tonometry but not RORA. Cooperation with IOP measurement was better with RORA than with Goldmann applanation tonometry.     

Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: Thinning of the corneal stroma by laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) results in inaccurate low intraocular pressure (IOP) readings by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) is a novel measuring technique, designed to measure IOP largely independent of corneal thickness and curvature. The purpose of this study was to compare IOP measurements using GAT and DCT in eyes undergoing LASIK for correction of myopia. METHODS: In a prospective, single-center study, central corneal thickness (CCT) and IOP were measured in patients undergoing first-time LASIK for myopia. IOP was measured before and after surgery using GAT and DCT. The untreated contralateral eyes served as paired controls. RESULTS: There was good concordance between the two tonometers in 62 normal eyes before LASIK. Corneal ablation of 90.0 +/- 49.18 micro m (median +/- SD) reduced IOP readings as measured by GAT by 3.0 +/- 1.9 mm Hg (P < 0.001). In contrast, no significant change in IOP readings was recorded by DCT (-0.2 mm Hg +/- 1.5 mm Hg, P = 0.30). There was no change in IOP in the untreated control eyes as measured by GAT and DCT. CONCLUSIONS: Significant decreases in IOP were recorded by GAT after LASIK for myopia. Measurements by DCT, however, did not reveal any significant changes in IOP.     

Corneal biomechanical changes and intraocular pressure in patients with thyroid orbitopathy

AIM: To determine the relevance of the objective parameters addressing the altered biomechanical properties of cornea for glaucoma monitoring in patients with mild or moderate thyroid associated orbitopathy (TAO), and in healthy individuals. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with TAO (group 1) and 25 healthy adults (group 2) were included to the study. Both groups were of a similar age and the ratio women:man. For each patient, the following parameters of both eyes were measured with ocular response analyzer (ORA): corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) and corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc). In both groups participating in our study, all measurements were performed within minutes to reduce the diurnal effects. RESULTS: The mean age in group 1 was 56±11y and 76% were women, 24% were men. The mean age in group 2 was 64±11y and 68% were women, 32% were men. CH correlated negatively with IOPg in group 1 (r2=0.10, P<0.05). IOPg strongly correlated with IOPcc in both groups (group 1: r2=0.79, P<0.0001; group 2: r2=0.85, P<0.0001). There was positive correlation between CRF and IOPg in group 1 (r2=0.12, P<0.05) and in group 2 (r2=0.31, P<0.0001). Statistical analysis revealed no significant correlation between CRF and IOPcc in group 1 (r2=0.009, P>0.05) and also no significant correlation in group 2 (r2=0.04, P>0.05). CRF mean value in group 2 (11.51±1.72 mm Hg) was higher than in group 1 (10.85±1.45 mm Hg) (P<0.05). IOPg strongly correlated with IOPcc in both groups (group 1: r2=0.79, P<0.0001; group 2: r2=0.85, P<0.0001). There was also strong correlation between CRF and CH in both populations: group 1: (r2=0.58, P<0.0001), group 2: (r2=0.41, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Biomechanical parameters of cornea, as quantified by CH and CRF, and measured together with IOPcc, precisely reveal glaucoma staging in TAO and thus are reliable for diagnosing and follow-up in clinical practice.     

Intravitreal silicone oil induced changes in corneal biomechanics

Our aim was to detect the early effects of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with intravitreal silicone oil (SO) on corneal biomechanics. 19 eyes underwent PPV with SO tamponade (group 1) and 16 eyes underwent. PPV without tamponade (group 2). Corneal biomechanical parameters were measured preoperatively and at the first postoperative month by ocular response analyzer. The mean preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and the mean corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) were significantly lower in group 1 than group 2 (p = 0.005, p = 0.002, respectively). The mean preoperative corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were significantly higher in group 1 than group 2 (p = 0.017, p = 0.002, respectively). However, the difference in Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) between the groups was not significant (p = 0.360). In group 1, IOPcc, IOPg and IOP-GAT significantly increased postoperatively (p = 0.002, p = 0.004, p = 0.002, respectively) but CH and CRF decreased (p = 0.007, p = 0.153, respectively). In group 2, IOPcc, IOPg and IOP (GAT) increased postoperatively but the differences were not significant (p = 0.851, p = 0.693, p = 0.336, respectively). The mean CRF increased significantly (p = 0.026) postoperatively but the decrease in CH was not significant (p = 0.196). Statistically significant differences were found in the changes of preoperative and postoperative means of IOPcc, IOPg, IOP-GAT and CRF between the groups (p = 0.024, p = 0.037, p = 0.014, p = 0.006, respectively). However, the difference in the decreases in CH between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.206). SO tamponade may affect corneal biomechanical parameters in the early postoperative period, which may be related to the surgery itself, SO tamponade or IOP changes.     

Reproducibility of viscoelastic property and intraocular pressure measurements obtained with the Ocular Response Analyzer

Purpose: To analyse the reproducibility of corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann‐correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) and corneal‐compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) obtained with the ocular response analyzer (ORA). Methods: This is a prospective study, nonmasked, of eight successive examinations with the ORA device in 60 normal eyes. Using 30 eyes (one eye per subject), the reproducibility was assessed by comparing the first series of four examinations to the second four and by calculating the within‐subject coefficient of variation. The correlation and difference with the fellow eye were analysed, respectively. Results: The mean values were 10.7 ± 1.8 mmHg, CRF; 10.6 ± 1.6 mmHg, CH; 15.9 ± 3.9 mmHg, IOPg and 16.2 ± 3.7 mmHg, IOPcc. The reproducibility was significantly different for CRF (5.2 ± 5.9%), CH (7.3 ± 8.6%), IOPg (7.7 ± 6.7%) and IOPcc (10.1 ± 8.0%); p < 0.001. Considering the reproducibility, CRF correlated with CH (rs = 0.55; p < 0.001) and showed to be independent of IOPg and IOPcc. The score spread was best for CRF (2.6 ± 1.5 mmHg; 24.0%) compared to IOPg (4.3 ± 1.5 mmHg; 28.1%) and CH (3.1 ± 1.7 mmHg; 29.9%) and worst for IOPcc (5.5 ± 2.5 mmHg; 34.4%). The lowest difference with the fellow eye was observed for CRF (5.0%; p = 0.09). The correlation with the fellow eye was high, especially for IOPcc and CRF (rs > 0.9; p < 0.001) followed by IOPg and CH (rs > 0.8; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The ORA device provides reproducible information on viscoelastic properties of the cornea in normal eyes notably CRF and CH. IOPcc was less reproducible. Four measurements per eye were necessary to reach a 10% precision and six for 5%.     

Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK

PURPOSE: To assess the performance of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (PDCT) (Swiss Microtechnology AG) by comparing it to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and noncontact air tonometry (NCT) before and after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Vlemma Eye Institute, Athens, Greece. METHODS: Intraocular pressure was measured in 118 eyes before and 1 and 4 weeks after LASIK using GAT, NCT, and the PDCT, which allows direct, digital, transcorneal measurement of intraocular pressure. RESULTS: Preoperatively, central corneal thickness (CCT) correlated with GAT and NCT measurements but not with PDCT measurements. After LASIK, the mean reduction in CCT ranged from -3.0 to -171.0 microm (median 78 microm). The mean GAT measurement dropped by -4.9 mm Hg +/- 2.7 (SD) at 1 week and was -5.4 +/- 3.0 mm Hg at 4 weeks. Similar drops were observed in NCT measurements. The observed post-LASIK changes in GAT and NCT IOP measurements were not directly proportional to the change in CCT, refractive error, or mean keratometric readings. The preoperative and postoperative PDCT measurements did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The structural corneal changes induced by LASIK appeared to influence GAT and NCT measurements but not PDCT measurements. Therefore, PDCT may be better suited for monitoring IOP in unoperated eyes and in eyes that have had LASIK.     

飞秒激光与机械板层刀制瓣的LASIK术后干眼的临床对比研究

目的：应用Oculus干眼分析仪观察飞秒激光与机械板层刀制瓣的LASIK术后干眼情况。方法：收集2014-01/04在潍坊眼科医院行飞秒激光制瓣的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术( FS-LASIK)及机械板层刀制瓣准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术( LASIK )的患者60例120眼,年龄27.46±6.65岁。其中LASIK组28例56眼, FS-LASIK组32例64眼。应用Oculus干眼分析仪观察患者术前、术后1 wk及术后1 mo时泪河高度、首次泪膜破裂时间、平均泪膜破裂时间随时间的变化。结果：Oculus 干眼分析仪检查术前泪河高度为0.25±0.10mm,首次泪膜破裂时间为6.70±3.86s,平均泪膜破裂时间为10.14±4.51 s。术后1 wk 泪河高度为0.19±0.04mm,首次泪膜破裂时间为4.87±1.71s,平均泪膜破裂时间为7.77±2.30s,两组患者术后1wk与术前相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1mo泪河高度为0.19±0.18mm,平均泪膜破裂时间为8.72±2.54s,首次泪膜破裂时间为5.02±2.30s,两组患者术后1mo与术前相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术后1mo与术后1 wk泪河高度及平均泪膜破裂时间差异均有统计学意义。术后1 mo首次泪膜破裂时间与术后1 wk相比差异无统计学意义。 FS-LASIK与LASIK组组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论：机械板层刀制瓣LASIK和FS-LASIK术后患者均有不同程度的干眼,泪液分泌量及泪膜的稳定性均有不同程度的下降,加用人工泪液干眼症状有所改善。 Oculus干眼分析仪非侵入性的反映泪液量及泪膜稳定性,有利于LASIK术后干眼的快速诊断及严重程度的判断。     

近视人群中角膜生物力学特性的分布

目的：分析伊朗近视眼及散光人群中角膜生物力学参数的分布特征。

方法：对接受激光矫正手术的近视眼及散光患者180眼进行前后节、显然验光等效球镜度、Orbscan II和Zywave全面的术前检查。用眼反应分析仪测量角膜滞后量,角膜阻力因子,模拟Goldmann眼压值及角膜补偿后眼压值。分析所有角膜生物力学的分布特性及其与显然验光等效球镜度、性别和年龄的相关性。数据采用SPSS 17软件进行统计学分析,以P<0.05为有显著性差异。

结果：平均年龄为28.20±6.78岁。平均显然验光等效球镜为-4.21±1.19D。平均角膜滞后量,角膜阻力因子,模拟Goldmann眼压值和角膜补偿后眼压值分别为10.00±1.28mmHg,10.17±1.45mmHg,15.71±2.67mmHg和 16.68±2.41mmHg。近视人群中,28.4%角膜滞后量约为10mmHg,71%从9mmHg增长到11mmHg。25.9%的近视人群的角膜阻力因子为10mmHg,48.7%为9mmHg增长到11mmHg。显然验光等效球镜与角膜滞后量(Rs=0.001,P=0.71)和显然验光等效球镜与角膜阻力因子(Rs=0.01,P=0.18)之间正相关性不明显。

结论：研究显示了伊朗近视眼人群中角膜生物力学的分布特征(角膜滞后量,角膜阻力因子,模拟Goldmann眼压值及角膜补偿后眼压值),并证实了角膜生物力学特性参数和显然验光等效球镜,年龄及性别之间没有统计学相关性。