Inhibitors of the interactions between collagen and its receptors on platelets

At sites of vascular injury, collagen-mediated platelet adhesion and activation have long been known as one of the first events in platelet-dependent thrombus formation. Studying patients with bleeding disorders that are caused by defective platelet adhesion to collagen resulted in the identification of several platelet collagen receptors, with glycoprotein VI and integrin α2β1 being the most important ones. Subsequent development of specific collagen receptor knockout mice and various inhibitors of platelet binding to collagen have further proven the role of these receptors in haemostasis and thrombosis. The search for clinically applicable inhibitors for use as antithrombotic drug has led to the identification of inhibitory antibodies, soluble receptor fragments, peptides, collagen-mimetics and proteins from snake venoms or haematophagous animals. In experimental settings, these inhibitors have a good antithrombotic effect, with little prolongation of bleeding times, suggesting a larger therapeutic window than currently available antiplatelet drugs. However, at present, none of the collagen receptor blockers are in clinical development yet.     

Platelet hyperreactivity and stent thrombosis in patients undergoing coronary stenting

Stent thrombosis (ST) is a rare but very serious event complicating percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures. Both procedure- and patient-related factors, including inadequate platelet inhibition are well known predictors of ST. According to the present guidelines, a dual antiplatelet treatment regimen consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor such as clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor is routinely administered to ACS patients and to patients undergoing PCI in order to prevent thrombotic vessel occlusions. In recent years, evidence has grown that patients showing high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) under clopidogrel intake exhibit a higher risk for the occurrence of ischemic events including ST. For assessing HPR, different platelet function assays are currently available and have already found their way into routine clinical practice in several centers. Along with this development, more potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitors like prasugrel and ticagrelor are substitutes for clopidogrel in specific circumstances such as in ACS patients or in patients who do not adequately respond to standard clopidogrel treatment. Utilizing platelet function monitoring, patients showing HPR can be identified and an optimized antiplatelet treatment regime can be tailored for these patients. This review paper aims to summarize the important facts in relation to ST and antiplatelet therapy with a particular focus on P2Y12 receptor inhibition and its ex vivo assessment in patients undergoing coronary stent placement.     

P2Y12 receptor antagonists in acute coronary syndrome: clinical implications of pharmacologic and pharmacogenetic differences

Platelet activation and aggregation are key events in the pathophysiological process of thrombosis, and vascular occlusions. Antiplatelet therapy has proven to be crucial for managing patients with acute coronary syndromes, coronary artery disease and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. However, residual platelet reactivity on antiplatelet treatment confers a five-fold increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events which indicates a need for more effective antiplatelet medications to address the substantial burden of cardiovascular disease. This article reviews the P2Y(12) receptor antagonists with regards to pharmacologic and pharmacogenetic differences and their clinical implications along with the discussion of recent patents.     

Clopidogrel and antiplatelet therapy

Large clinical trials performed with ticlopidine in patients with atherosclerotic arterial diseases showed that ticlopidine was of benefit to patients who were at high risk of vascular events and demonstrated that it was likely to be more efficacious than other antiplatelet drugs tested to date. The search for other active antiplatelet drugs within the original chemical class of the thienopyridines led to the discovery of a new molecule: clopidogrel. Clopidogrel is a novel ADP-selective agent whose antiaggregating properties are several times higher than those of ticlopidine and are apparently due to the same mechanism of action (inhibition of ADP binding to its platelet receptor). This effect has been seen in various experimental animal species as well as in healthy volunteers and in atherosclerotic patients. Of particular interest is the ability of this drug to prevent arterial as well as venous thrombosis in animals and also to reduce myointimal thickening occurring after endothelial injury of the rabbit carotid artery. Clopidogrel seems to be better tolerated than ticlopidine and, on the basis of the activity/toxicity ratio observed, appears to be a promising compound for evaluation in atherosclerotic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. The outcome of clinical trials currently in progress could provide definite evidence of clopidogrel's efficacy.     

Novel Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes: What is New in the Pipeline?

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are triggered by enhanced platelet activation and aggregation. Hence, a cornerstone of successful secondary prevention in ACS is an effective platelet inhibition. Additionally, coronary interventions (PCI) lead to even increased artherothrombotic risks, another challenge in preventing recurrent events including stent thrombosis. Promising platelet targets were characterized and novel molecules were developed that are currently under investigation. Intensified antiplatelet therapy includes the risk of major bleeding which itself increases the mortality rate. Previous strategies of antiplatelet therapy were based on an "one-size fits all" concept. However, there has been evidence that variability of drug response exists and represents a clinically relevant issue. This observation is in line with results of randomized clinical trials that standard-of-care antiplatelet therapy is not sufficient to reduce cardiovascular (CV) risk in certain subgroups of ACS patients. In the last years, novel antiplatelet substances have entered the clinical arena and others are currently under investigation in phase II and III clinical trials. These include 3rd generation thienopyridine (prasugrel, elinogrel), ATP analogs (Ticagrelor, cangrelor), and non-ADP-receptor blocking antiplatelet substances like thrombin receptor antagonists. These agents have shown promising results in pilot studies and recent randomized trials. As the prevention of atherothrombotic risk is at the expense of bleeding risk, it will be a future task to clearly define patients' groups and subsets of ACS for the best net clinical benefit. This article focuses on the role of novel antiplatelet substances to reduce CV risk in ACS, discuss clinical implications and their potential future role.     

Thienopyridines and Other ADP-Receptor Antagonists

Platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibition plays a pivotal role in preventing thrombotic vascular events in patients with ACS and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among the P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, the group of thienopyridines include ticlopidine, clopidogrel and prasugrel, all of which are orally administered prodrugs leading to irreversible P2Y12 receptor inhibition. Non-thienopyridine derivatives including ticagrelor, cangrelor and elinogrel do not require metabolic activation and lead to a reversible P2Y12 receptor inhibition in contrast to thienopyridines. The extend of platelet inhibition is subject to the administered antiplatelet agent and influenced by individual genetic and clinical factors. Insufficient platelet inhibition, termed high platelet reactivity (HPR) is associated with an increased risk for ischemic events after PCI whereas exceeding platelet inhibition results in an increased bleeding risk. Pharmacologic properties and clinical outcome data differ substantially between the existing P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Whether individualized antiplatelet treatment incorporating different P2Y12 receptor inhibitors improves patients' clinical outcomes warrants further investigation.     

The use of platelet reactivity testing in patients on antiplatelet therapy for prediction of bleeding events after cardiac surgery

Many patients are treated with platelet inhibitors such as aspirin and clopidogrel for prevention of thrombotic cardiovascular events. However, the inhibitory effect of antiplatelet therapy is variable between patients; in some, the platelets are hardly inhibited, while in others, the platelets are excessively inhibited. The newer and more potent platelet inhibitors, prasugrel and ticagrelor, often lead to low platelet reactivity, which potentially leads to bleeding events. Preoperative measurement of platelet reactivity in patients receiving platelet inhibitors who undergo cardiac surgery, could be useful to identify those with low platelet reactivity and thus have an increased risk of bleeding during or after surgery. In this review, we discuss the most commonly used platelet inhibitors and platelet function tests. Furthermore, we will provide an overview of the evidence for the prediction of post-operative bleeding at the operation site with preoperative platelet reactivity testing in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.     

Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy for Atherothrombotic Disease: The Role of Current and Emerging Agents

Coronary atherothrombotic disease, including chronic stable angina and acute coronary syndromes (ACS), is associated with significant global burden. The acute clinical manifestations of atherothrombotic disease are mediated by occlusive arterial thrombi that impair tissue perfusion and are composed of a core of aggregated platelets, generated by platelet activation, and a superimposed fibrin mesh produced by the coagulation cascade. Long-term antithrombotic therapies, namely oral antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, have demonstrated variable clinical effects. Aspirin and P2Y₁₂ adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce the risk for thrombosis and ischaemic events by blocking the thromboxane (Tx) A₂ and platelet P2Y₁₂ activation pathways, respectively, whereas the benefits of oral anticoagulants have not been consistently documented. However, even in the presence of aspirin and a P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist, the risk for ischaemic events remains substantial because platelet activation continues via pathways independent of TxA₂ and ADP, most notably the protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 platelet activation pathway stimulated by thrombin. Emerging antithrombotic therapies include those targeting the platelet, such as the new P2Y₁₂ antagonists and a novel class of oral PAR-1 antagonists, and those inhibiting the coagulation cascade, such as the new direct factor Xa antagonists, the direct thrombin inhibitors, and a novel class of factor IX inhibitors. The role of emerging antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants in the long-term management of patients with atherothrombotic disease will be determined by the balance of efficacy and safety in large ongoing clinical trials.     

New perspectives in antiplatelet therapy

Platelet activation is a complex mechanism of response to vascular injury and atherothrombotic disease, leading to thrombus formation. A wide variety of surface receptors -integrins, leucine-rich family receptors, G protein coupled receptors, tyrosine kinase receptors- and intraplatelet molecules support and regulate platelet activation. They are potential targets of antiplatelet therapy for the prevention and treatment of arterial thrombosis. Despite the overall clinical benefit of established antiplatelet drugs targeting cyclooxigenase-1 (COX-1), glycoprotein integrin αIIbβ3, and the purinergic P2Y(12) receptor of adenosine diphosphate, a significant proportion of treated patients continue to experience recurrent ischaemic events. This may be in partly attributed to insufficient inhibition of platelet activation. In addition, it should not be underestimated that these drugs are not immune from bleeding complications. The substantial progress in understating the regulation of platelet activation has played a key role in the development of novel antiplatelet agents. Current examples of drug under development and evaluation include: novel P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors (prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor, and elinogrel), thrombin receptor PAR-1 antagonists (vorapaxar, atopaxar), new integrin glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and inhibitors targeting the thromboxane receptor (TP), phosphodiesterases, the collagen receptor glycoprotein VI, and intraplatelet signalling molecules. This review summarizes the mechanisms of action and current clinical evaluation of these novel antiplatelet agents.     

Monitoring the effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy: opportunities and limitations

Previous clinical studies have shown heterogeneity in individual patient responses to antiplatelet therapy and high residual platelet reactivity is associated with increased risk of adverse clinical events. Monitoring response to antiplatelet therapy and tailoring treatment accordingly is currently not recommended in routine clinical practice largely due to the lack of a standardized definition of antiplatelet therapy hyporesponse and the need for a widely accepted point-of-care platelet function test that can be reliably utilized in frontline clinical practice. Recent data have shown that titrating the dose of clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduces the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and large-scale clinical trials are currently underway to investigate whether individually tailored treatment based on results of platelet function testing leads to improved clinical outcome. Furthermore, genetic testing has demonstrated a link between CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms, altered clopidogrel metabolite concentrations and adverse clinical events. Clinical studies are currently underway to investigate the potential clinical benefit associated with genotype-guided tailoring of antiplatelet therapy. With the advent of newer, more potent antiplatelet agents and their associated increased bleeding risks, it will become imperative in the future to select the most appropriate, safe and effective drug.     

Clinical significance of residual platelet reactivity in patients treated with platelet P2Y12 inhibitors

Platelet P2Y₁₂ inhibitors have become an essential component of the treatment strategy for patients with acute coronary syndromes and patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. It is now well-established that approximately 30% of patients treated with the P2Y₁₂ inhibitor clopidogrel display high residual platelet reactivity despite treatment. Patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity have approximately 2–3-fold greater risk of adverse cardiovascular events and stent thrombosis than those without high platelet reactivity. Conversely, clopidogrel-treated patients with low platelet reactivity display approximately 1.7-fold increased risk of major bleeding. High platelet reactivity is uncommon during treatment with prasugrel and ticagrelor, which achieve a greater reduction in adverse cardiovascular events compared to clopidogrel in ACS patients treated with PCI. This is at the expense of an increase in spontaneous bleeding, however. Minor bleeding events, such as skin haematomas, are more common in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients that have particularly low platelet reactivity values. These minor bleeding events may occasionally prompt discontinuation of therapy, but their overall prognostic impact is uncertain. However, risk factors for bleeding tend to overlap with risk factors for adverse cardiovascular events. Therefore, patients with these minor bleeding events may also be at higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events, conferring a benefit from low platelet reactivity. Further work is needed to determine the optimal level of platelet reactivity in individuals by taking into account their risk of subsequent adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding.     

Platelet function and antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease: implications of genetic polymorphisms

Platelets play a crucial role in thrombosis, inflammation, immunity and atherogenesis. Antiplatelet agents are widely used in patients with acute coronary syndrome and other cardiovascular disorders. Aspirin and clopidogrel are the most commonly prescribed antiplatelet agents, with a relatively safe profile and efficiency in a variety of clinical conditions. Numerous prospective studies have revealed variability of antiplatelet efficacy. The so called "antiplatelet resistance" prompted a search for mechanisms implicated in poor responsiveness to aspirin and clopidogrel therapy. In this regard, genetic polymorphisms in the platelet receptor genes attracted considerable interest. Specific genetic variants in platelet receptors such as the P2Y12, glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa, GPIa/IIa, GPIb/IX/V and the cytochrome P450 (CYP) family of genes are associated with variable response to antiplatelet therapy and cardiovascular events. Genetic polymorphisms and haplotypes that comprehensively capture the genetic information encoded within the platelet receptor genes can, to some extent, predict response to the antiplatelet drug better than any single genotype. Genotyping for multiple receptor variants in patients on antiplatelet therapy, complemented by standardized quantification of platelet function, can provide useful information for future drug design studies and possibly for personalized antiplatelet therapy and prevention of thrombotic events. Additional information is, however, needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of complex genetic and platelet function testing.     

Prasugrel: a novel platelet ADP P2Y12 receptor antagonist. A review on its mechanism of action and clinical development

Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients who present with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clopidogrel, in combination with aspirin, is associated with improvement in long-term clinical outcomes in these patients and is currently the antiplatelet therapy of choice. However, a significant number of patients experience recurrent ischemic events, which have been in part attributed to variability in individual response profiles to currently recommended treatment regimens. The presence of variable degrees of responsiveness, thus inadequate platelet inhibition in some patients, underscores the need for novel agents with more potency and less variable platelet inhibitory effects. Prasugrel (CS-747; LY640315), a novel third-generation oral thienopyridine, is a specific, irreversible antagonist of the platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) P2Y₁₂ receptor. Pre-clinical and early phase clinical studies have shown prasugrel to be characterized by more potent antiplatelet effects, lower interindividual variability in platelet response, and faster onset of activity compared with clopidogrel. Recent findings from large-scale Phase III testing showed prasugrel to be more efficacious in preventing ischemic events in ACS patients undergoing PCI; however, this is achieved at the expense of an increased risk of bleeding. This article reviews the currently available data regarding the efficacy and safety of prasugrel.     

Antiplatelet Agents for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes Mellitus

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have accelerated atherothrombotic disease of coronary, cerebral, leg, and other vessels. The major cause of death is cardiovascular, and the risk for a myocardial infarction (MI) in a patient with DM who has never had a MI is the same as a nondiabetic individual who has already had one. In this paper, we review the major reasons for a prothrombotic state in patients with DM: alterations in the intrinsic coagulation and fibrinolytic systems and many abnormalities of platelet function. Increased platelet thromboxane production as well as activation of platelet receptors for fibrinogen and or adenosine diphosphate (ADP) are often present, and can be treated with aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and/or receptor blockers. Review of the major primary prevention trials in DM indicates that a significantly reduced risk for MI or major cardiovascular events may be obtained by enteric-coated aspirin, 81–325 mg/day. There is emerging consensus that this is recommended strategy in adult (aged >30 years) patients with DM who are at high vascular risk. Surveys suggest that this includes virtually every patient with type 2 DM in the US, as well as many patients with complicated type 1 DM. These recommendations are also appropriate for secondary prevention. Data supporting the use of clopidogrel as an alternative drug in the case of aspirin allergy or other contraindications are reviewed. Evidence is presented in support of using aspirin plus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes (ACS), and a meta-analysis of six trials of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors and aspirin in diabetic patients with ACS establishes this regimen as an effective choice. Although bleeding episodes are more common with combined antiplatelet therapy for ACS than for aspirin alone, the benefit of a significant reduction in 30-day mortality appears to outweigh the risk of major bleeding. It is concluded that major advances in our understanding of the prothrombotic state in DM have been made. Evidence from controlled clinical trials supports the use of enteric-coated aspirin, 81–325 mg/day, as a primary and a secondary prevention strategy in adults with DM with high vascular risk. In ACS, combination therapy with aspirin plus clopidogrel or alternatively, aspirin plus a platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor is supported by prospective trial data. These approaches should be added to the other multifactorial preventive strategies directed at lowering the risk for major vascular events in patients with DM.     

Editorial Commentary

Thrombotic events of the arterial circulation continue to be the major cause of cardiovascular death in spite of great efforts to prevent and treat thrombosis. Current antithrombotic strategies in clinical use are primarily based on aspirin (antiplatelet), heparin (anticoagulant) and coumadins (chronic anticoagulants). Recently, ReoPro®, an antibody blocking the platelet fibrinogen receptor, GpIIb/IIIa, has been introduced for limited acute use for prevention of ischaemic complications of coronary balloon angioplasty. Clopidogrel is a novel antiplatelet agent that has demonstrated antithrombotic efficacy beyond aspirin in preclinical studies and is now in clinical (Phase II) development for secondary prevention of broad ischaemic cardiovascular events including death. Clopidogrel is an ADP receptor antagonist with additional properties that produce effective and long-lasting antithrombotic actions. Clopidogrel seems to be free of the adverse side-effects that flawed ticlopidine, a closely related thieno-derivative, and is at least six-fold more potent. It is expected that clopidogrel will add significantly to the antichrombotic arsenal and reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality above and beyond currently available therapy.     

The role of the cytochrome P450 polymorphisms in clopidogrel efficacy and clinical utility

Clopidogrel, an antiplatelet agent, prevents platelet aggregation by inhibiting the adenosine disphosphate (ADP) P2Y12 receptor, which is located on the platelet surface. Although dual antiplatelet therapy appears to be efficient, a considerable number of patients continue to experience adverse cardiovascular events, such as stent thrombosis. The percentage of low response to antiplatelet therapy varies from 4% to 30% of patients depending on the cut-off values. In addition, several factors such as poor absorption, drug-to-drug interactions, inadequate dosing, elevated body mass index, insulin resistance and the nature of acute coronary syndromes have been implicated in low clopidogrel response. Recently, studies have focused on the role of genetic polymorphisms encoding enzymes that participate in clopidogrel hepatic metabolism or receptors involved in intestinal absorption and ADP induced platelet aggregation, which may affect the percentage of platelet inhibition after clopidogrel administration. The management of clopidogrel resistance remains a controversial issue and additional studies are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of increased loading of clopidogrel or replacement with other new antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel.     

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists: clinical pharmacology in cardiovascular diseases of aging.

The aging process is accompanied by a series of anatomical and physiological cardiovascular changes, including a generalised loss of vascular compliance, neuroendocrine alterations and endothelial dysfunction. Superimposed on this, there is an age-related increase in common cardiovascular disorders, such that the majority of deaths and much disability in older populations are caused by coronary artery disease. Most acute vascular events are mediated by thrombosis in which the formation of platelet aggregates forms an integral part. Research over recent years has led to the characterisation of the platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor as the ultimate mechanism by which activated platelets cross-link by binding fibrinogen and other ligands. This knowledge has resulted in novel pharmacological strategies targeting this receptor which have proven to be potent inhibitors of thrombosis. The prototype drug, abciximab, is a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against GP IIb/IIIa. Synthesis of new drugs has followed, based on the identification of the molecular sequences to which GP IIb/IIIa is attracted. This includes the emergence of oral agents which can be used for long term therapy. Clinical trials with these agents in the setting of percutaneous coronary interventions and unstable ischaemic syndromes have demonstrated a beneficial effect on thrombosis-related end-points. Trials of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists for direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in acute myocardial infarction have also shown benefit, while their use in combination with fibrinolytic drugs is currently being evaluated. Other potential indications including neurovascular disease and primary haematological disorders are also being explored.     

Antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes

Introduction: Coronary thrombosis is a frequent cause of death and myocardial infarction most often explained by superimposition of a platelet-rich thrombus on existing coronary artery disease. Therefore, antiplatelet drugs are essential in the treatment and secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and during percutaneous coronary intervention. Several novel antiplatelet drugs are now available.

Areas covered: For several years, aspirin and clopidogrel remained the cornerstone of treatment for ACS. However, prasugrel and ticagrelor have a more consistent, faster-acting and more potent antiplatelet effect than clopidogrel, which translates into improved clinical outcomes, although at the expense of an increased bleeding risk. Importantly, some patients experience cardiovascular events despite current antiplatelet treatment, because platelet activation may occur via pathways not inhibited by these agents. Therefore, improved antiplatelet strategies are warranted.

Expert opinion: Despite undisputable benefits of current antiplatelet strategies, a considerable number of patients continue to experience adverse thrombotic events, although clinical outcomes have been improved with new oral P2Y₁₂ antagonists. New drugs have been developed, including intravenous P2Y₁₂ antagonists and oral antagonist targeting the protease-activated receptor-1 platelet activation pathway stimulated by thrombin. This review provides an overview of current and novel antiplatelet strategies and also discusses unmet needs related to antiplatelet therapy for ACS.     

Antiplatelet drugs and platelet reactivity: is it time to halt clinical research on tailored strategies?

Personalized medicine of antiplatelet drugs in cardiovascular patients has led to a significant enthusiasm. Indeed, numerous longitudinal studies showed an association between high platelet reactivity and the recurrence of ischemic events. The first small randomized trials of P2Y₁₂ blockers tailored to each patient’s platelet reactivity yielded encouraging reductions of coronary stent thrombosis in high-risk populations. The discovery of genetic variants contributing to the pharmacodynamic effect of clopidogrel has then paved the way toward a personalized antiplatelet therapy based on reliable and stable genetic tests. This enthusiasm was soon tempered by large interventional trials demonstrating that a platelet function testing-based strategy did not improve clinical outcome and that genetic variants discovered up to now only explained a small part of the pharmacodynamic effect of clopidogrel, thus limiting its clinical use. Looking back to the most recent trials, their target populations and the type of clinical setting, it seems that the one-size-fits all policy regarding antiplatelet drugs may be well acceptable for low-risk patients. On the contrary, integration of the clinical setting as well as other risk factors may help to identify subgroups of patients who could derive a benefit from a truly personalized management of antiplatelet therapy.     

Antiplatelet therapies: platelet GPIIb/IIIa antagonists and beyond

Accumulating evidence supports the critical role of platelet involvement in arterial thrombosis, and argues for the development of more efficacious, yet safe, antiplatelet therapies. Aspirin continues to be used routinely for the management of acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina and secondary prevention of ischemic events. Nevertheless, adverse clinical outcomes still occur. Newer-generation drugs such as clopidogrel (an adenosine-diphosphate receptor antagonist) and intravenous glycoprotein (GP)IIb/IIIa antagonists (inhibitors of platelet aggregation irrespective of the stimulus) have demonstrated significant clinical benefit. This review will discuss the role of the aforementioned antiplatelet therapies in thrombotic disorders as well as future directions in the field.