Sex-based differences in clinical and angiographic outcomes after primary angioplasty or stenting for acute myocardial infarction

A paucity of data exists on the importance of gender in contributing to the mortality rate after primary angioplasty, although it is has been shown that women with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are less likely than men to undergo reperfusion treatments. This study analyzes gender-related differences in 6-month clinical and angiographic outcomes in nonselected patients with AMI who underwent primary angioplasty or stenting. We compared clinical and angiographic outcomes of 230 women and 789 men who underwent primary angioplasty or stenting from January 1995 to August 1999. The women were older than the men, and had a greater incidence of diabetes and cardiogenic shock. The 6-month mortality rate was 12% in women and 7% in men (p = 0.028). Nonfatal reinfarction occurred in 3% of the women and in 1% of the men (p = 0.010). There were no differences in repeat target vessel revascularization rates. After multivariate analysis, gender did not emerge as a significant variable in relation to 6-month mortality or to the combined end point of death, reinfarction, and repeat target vessel revascularization. Both women and men with stented infarct arteries had lower restenosis rates (29% and 26%, respectively) than patients without stents (52% and 39%, repectively). The results of outcome analysis in nonselected patients suggest that sex is not an independent predictor of mortality after primary angioplasty for AMI, and that the benefit of primary stenting is similar in men and women.     

Relation between preintervention angiographic evidence of coronary collateral circulation and clinical and angiographic outcomes after primary angioplasty or stenting for acute myocardial infarction.

It is unknown if collateral circulation (CC) has a beneficial effect on outcomes of patients who undergo mechanical intervention in the first hours after onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study analyzes the relation between CC and outcome in patients with AMI who underwent primary angioplasty or stenting within 6 hours of symptom onset. The analysis was performed in a series of 1,164 consecutive patients. The contribution of clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables to the angiographic and clinical outcomes was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model, respectively. Of 1,164 patients, 264 (23%) had angiographic evidence of CC. Patients with CC had a lower incidence of diabetes (11% vs 16%, p = 0.033), anterior AMI (41% vs 55%, p <0.001), cardiogenic shock (9% vs 14%, p = 0.029), anterograde TIMI grade flow >1 (10% vs 21%, p <0.001), and a greater incidence of preinfarction angina (43% vs 32%, p = 0.001), multivessel disease (59% vs 47%, p = 0.001), and total chronic occlusion (20% vs 10%, p <0.001). At 6 months, the mortality rate was lower in patients with CC compared with patients without CC (4% vs 9%, p = 0.011), whereas there were no differences in the incidence of reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, and angiographic restenosis. After multivariate analysis, CC did not emerge as a significant variable in relation to 6-month clinical and angiographic outcomes. CC does not exert a protective effect in patients who undergo mechanical intervention in the first 6 hours of AMI onset.     

Early administration of abciximab in patients with acute myocardial infarction improves angiographic and clinical outcome after primary angioplasty.

Adjunctive use of abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) improves clinical outcome. This study addresses the outcome of patients with AMI treated with abciximab, initiated either before transport to a PCI center (early group) or immediately upon arrival at the catheterization laboratory (late group) for primary PCI. Of 446 consecutive patients with AMI, angiographic data and clinical complications were evaluated up to 6 months after primary PCI. Patients received abciximab before transport (early group; n = 138) or just before the intervention (late group; n = 308). Baseline data, including transport time (45 +/- 15 min; range, 15-60 min), were comparable in both groups. Early reperfusion was more prevalent in the early group (35% vs. late 19%; P < 0.001). Furthermore, a better final TIMI 3 flow was noted in the early group (91% vs. late 83%; P = 0.05). Although mortality reduction attributable to early abciximab treatment could not be demonstrated, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred in 27% in the early group and 36% in the late group (P = 0.05). Revascularization rates were similar, but repeat acute coronary syndromes were less frequent in the early group (11% vs. late group 20%; P = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, cardiogenic shock, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and previously known coronary artery disease were independent predictors of higher MACE rate, whereas early reperfusion and final TIMI 3 flow reduced 6-month MACE rate. Abciximab pretreatment of patients with AMI for primary PCI results in better initial and final TIMI flow and tends to improve 6-month clinical outcome.     

Retrospective comparative study of primary intracoronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

Balloon angioplasty has been shown to be an effective therapy for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction but is associated with a high restenosis rate, substantial early recoil, persistent thrombus and need for intracoronary thrombolysis, and a high rate of reclosure. Because many of the limitations of balloon angioplasty in the noninfarction setting are addressed by intracoronary stenting, we examined the results of primary stenting of 18 consecutive patients treated for acute myocardial infarction, and compared the results to those achieved with primary balloon angioplasty in 18 prior cases. Despite the presence of thrombus prior to angioplasty in 13 of the stented patients, no intracoronary thrombolytic therapy was required. Mean percent stenosis using quantitative coronary angiography was 17.7 ± 10.2% after primary stenting compared with 43.7 ± 20.3% after primary balloon angioplasty (P < .001). One stent patient who had all anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy withdrawn early suffered subacute thrombosis. Patients were followed up to 3 yr. Complications were similar in the two groups. We conclude that primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction results in superior angiographic appearance as well as resolution of thrombus without the need for routine thrombolysis, and is associated with a low complication rate and excellent short-term clinical patency. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 40:235–239, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Impact of cilostazol on clinical and angiographic outcome after primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction

Cilostazol, an antiplatelet drug that also may inhibit smooth muscle proliferation, was given together with aspirin after primary stenting to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction. In a randomized controlled trials of 50 patients, clinical and angiographic outcome at 6 months was significantly improved with cilostazol, depicting a significantly smaller late loss and/or loss index.     

Effect of adjunctive tirofiban therapy on angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary stenting

The benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention is limited by a 5% to 20% incidence of suboptimal epicardial coronary blood (< or = TIMI-2 flow). Recently, data has demonstrated that when administered in conjunction with primary stenting for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), abciximab improves the success rate of the stenting procedure and provides additional clinical benefits. But data on a combination of tirofiban and primary stenting for treatment of ST-segment elevated (ST-se) AMI is unknown. Between May 1999 and September 2000, primary stenting without adjunctive tirofiban therapy was performed in 136 consecutive patients (control group) with ST-se AMI. Between January 2001 and May 2002, we routinely administered tirofiban to 133 consecutive patients (study group) with ST-se AMI before they underwent primary stenting. The angiographic and clinical outcomes of both groups were compared in a chronologically consecutive manner. The overall mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with failed (< or = TIMI-2 flow) than in patients with successful (TIMI-3) reperfusion (20.0% vs 3.5%, P < 0.0001). Univariate analysis demonstrated that there were no significant differences in the successful reperfusion (85.7% vs 84.6%, P = 0.84) or 30-day combined end points - death, recurrent ischemia or reinfarction (8.3% vs 11.0%, P = 0.59) between study and control group patients. Clinical variables were used to statistically analyze potential risk factors for unsuccessful reperfusion (< or = TIMI-2 flow) in the study group patients. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the reference lumen diameter (RLD) of the infarct-related artery (IRA) > or = 3.5 mm (P = 0.0004) and the lesion length of the obstruction > or = 20.0 mm (P = 0.018) were the significant independent predictors of failed normalized coronary blood flow. There were no significant differences in the restenotic rate of IRA (29.2% vs 30.8%, P = 0.9) or mortality rate (1.6% vs 1.6%, P = 1.0) at six-month follow-up. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that primary stenting with adjunctive tirofiban therapy in ST-se AMI did not provide additional benefits in short-term and intermediate-term angiographic and clinical outcomes compared to conventional primary stenting.     

Predictors of and outcomes of early thrombosis following balloon angioplasty versus primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction and usefulness of abciximab (the CADILLAC trial)

We sought to identify the predictors and clinical outcomes of early thrombosis after primary angioplasty and stenting for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Little is known about the correlates and prognosis of acute and subacute thromboses after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for AMI. We therefore studied the frequency, clinical determinants, and implications of early thrombosis in a large trial of patients who had primary PCI. In the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications trial, 2,082 patients who had AMI were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to primary stenting or to balloon angioplasty, each with and without abciximab. Early thrombosis occurred in 19 patients (0.9%) at a median of 2 days (range 0 to 23). Maximal balloon diameter was smaller, and aneurysmal and bifurcation lesions were more prevalent in the group with early thrombosis. Early thrombosis occurred in 0.4% of patients who had been randomized to receive abciximab versus 1.5% of control patients (p <0.01) and in 0.5% of patients who had been randomized to undergo stenting versus 1.4% of those who underwent balloon angioplasty (p = 0.04). By multivariate analysis, abciximab use was an independent predictor of no thrombosis (hazard ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.86, p = 0.026). Within 30 days, 5.3% of patients who had early thrombosis died, 32.9% developed reinfarction, and 89.5% required repeat target vessel revascularization (including bypass surgery in 11.1%). As a result, patients who had versus those who did not have early thrombosis had markedly higher rates of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days (94.7% vs 5.0%, p <0.0001) and at 1 year (94.7% vs 16.9%, p <0.0001). Patients who develop early thrombosis after primary PCI have a very high rate of major adverse cardiac events, including death and reinfarction, and usually require repeat coronary angioplasty or surgery for management. Complex baseline angiographic morphology and smaller maximal balloon diameter are predictors of early thrombosis after primary PCI for AMI. The incidence of early thrombosis after primary angioplasty and stenting is decreased by abciximab use.     

血管成形术应用冠状动脉支架和阿昔单抗在治疗ST段抬高性心肌梗死作用

多年来,冠状动脉支架一直避免用于ST段抬高性心肌梗死,因为移植的金属支架可导致支架血栓形成。为避免血栓形成,须用大剂量的抗凝血药,可增加病人出血危险性和出现血管并发症。然而,近年对支架的技术改良和抗血小板药进展可令冠状动脉支架植入术用于ST段抬高性心肌梗死现已变得更加安全和有效。作者复习文献对此进行综述。     

急性心肌梗死紧急PTCA联合支架置入与静脉内溶栓再通的比较

目的　比较急性心肌梗死 (AMI)行紧急PTCA联合支架置入术 (PCI)组与静脉内溶栓再通 (IT)组的差异。方法　对PCI组 4 8例和IT组 37例患者的临床资料 ,以及经上述 2种方法治疗后的临床事件发生率进行比较。结果　PCI组的出血发生率较IT组少 (2 0 8%vs 2 9 73% ,P <0 0 1) ,住院时间短 (15 375d± 6 2 4dvs 18 6 7d± 10 89d ,P <0 0 5 )。非致死性心绞痛发作、再梗死、脑梗死、非致死性心衰发作、心源性死亡率前者均少于后者 ,但统计学上无差异。结论　对急性心肌梗死 ,紧急PTCA联合支架置入术是一种好的方法 ,在某些方面优于静脉溶栓     

Direct stenting after thrombus removal before primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction

Objectives: To verify whether direct stenting (DS) after thrombus removal during primary angioplasty (PPCI) in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) can improve myocardial reperfusion and prevent distal embolization compared to conventional stent implantation.
Background: Both mechanical removal and DS reduce thrombus dislodgment and improve microcirculatory reperfusion during PPCI. However, the additional effect of DS after thrombus removal has not been definitely assessed.
Methods: The DEAR-MI study included 148 consecutive STEMI patients who were randomly assigned to undergo or not thrombus aspiration before PPCI. For the purpose of the present study, we interrogated the DEAR-MI data bank to compare the occurrence of complete (>70%) ST-segment resolution (STR), myocardial blush grade (MBG)-3, no-reflow, and angiographic embolization in patients treated and untreated with DS.
Results: Clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar in the two groups. Comparing DS and no-DS groups, complete STR was found in 67% versus 51% (P = 0.08), MBG-3 in 86% versus 49% (P < 0.001), no-reflow in 1% versus14% (P < 0.01), angiographic embolization in 3% versus 19% (P < 0.01), TIMI flow-3 in 89% versus 70% (P < 0.01), and the corrected TIMI frame count was 16.2 versus 18.8 (P < 0.05). Among patients undergoing thrombus aspiration, the odds ratio of DS for MBG-3 and distal embolization was 4 (95% CI 1–16.6) and 0.10 (95% CI 0.01–0.93), respectively.
At multivariable analysis, thrombus aspiration (P < 0.001) and DS (P < 0.05) independently predicted MBG-3, while thrombus aspiration was the only independent predictor of DS.
Conclusions: DS during PPCI reduces distal embolization and improves myocardial reperfusion. This effect is significantly more relevant after thrombus aspiration.     

Relation between coronary thrombus and angiographic no-flow during primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction

No flow is an unsolved issue in primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and the pathophysiology of no-flow is undetermined. To evaluate the potential participation of coronary thromboembolism in no-flow during primary PTCA, the present study reviewed cinefilms of 256 consecutive patients who underwent primary PTCA for AMI within 24h after the onset of chest pain between January 1992 and June 1998, focusing on the thrombus size. Angiographic no-flow was defined as the cessation of flow into the distal coronary circulation of the treated vessel with a to-and-fro contrast movement, not attributable to high-grade stenosis or spasm of the original target lesion. The coronary thrombus size was determined by using the 2-cm balloon catheter as a reference after crossing the infarct-related occluded artery with a guide wire. Angiographic no-flow was observed in 37 patients (37/256, 14%): 14 of 29 cases (48%) with a large thrombus (> or =2cm) versus 23 of 227 cases (9%) with a small thrombus (<2cm, 14/29 vs 23/227, p<0.01). Among 37 patients who experienced angiographic no-flow, overt distal emboli were observed in 14 patients. A thrombolytic agent was used through a guiding catheter in 102 cases prior to or after balloon dilatation to prevent or attenuate distal embolism, particularly in all those cases with a large thrombus (29/29 100%), and angiographic no-flow was seen in 27 cases of this subgroup (27/102, 26%). It is suggested that distal thromboembolism plays an important role in the mechanism of angiographic no-flow during primary PTCA performed for AMI.     

Coronary artery stenting for acute closure complicating primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

We report a case of progressive right coronary artery dissection complicating direct angioplasty for an acute inferior myocardial infarct, with successful bail-out stenting of the affected vessel.     

Impact of stenting and abciximab in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (the CADILLAC trial)

We sought to determine the benefits of stent implantation and abciximab in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent primary angioplasty. In a 2-by-2 factorial design, 2,082 patients with AMI were randomly assigned to balloon angioplasty versus stenting, with or without abciximab. Diabetes was present in 346 patients (16.6%). The primary end point was the composite incidence of death, disabling stroke, reinfarction, and ischemic target vessel revascularization (TVR). The primary end point at 1 year occurred significantly more frequently in diabetic than nondiabetic patients (21.9% vs 16.8%, p <0.02), driven by increased rates of death (6.1% vs 3.9%, p = 0.04) and TVR (16.4% vs 12.7%, p = 0.07). Among patients with diabetes, TVR at 1 year was significantly reduced with routine stenting compared with balloon angioplasty (10.3% vs 22.4%, p = 0.004), with no differences in death, reinfarction, or stroke. Angiographic restenosis was also greatly reduced in diabetics randomized to stenting (21.1% vs 47.6%, p = 0.009). No beneficial effects were apparent with abciximab in diabetic patients at 1 year. Despite the improved outcomes with stenting in patients with diabetes, 1-year mortality remained increased in diabetic patients who received stents compared with nondiabetics (8.2% vs 3.6%, p = 0.005). Thus, routine stent implantation in diabetic patients with AMI significantly reduces restenosis and enhances survival free from TVR, independent of abciximab use, although survival remains reduced compared with survival in nondiabetic patients regardless of reperfusion modality.     

One-year clinical outcomes and relative costs of primary infarct artery stenting versus angioplasty following systemic thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.

We investigated the clinical effectiveness and relative cost of two different infarct artery revascularization strategies in patients following systemic thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. The clinical efficacy and relative cost of stenting and angioplasty have not been investigated in patients requiring infarct artery revascularization after systemic thrombolysis for myocardial infarction. We prospectively enrolled 220 consecutive patients who received thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction and were subsequently treated with either angioplasty or primary stenting of the infarct artery. In-hospital and 1-year clinical outcomes, including death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization, and total hospital costs over the 1-year study period were assessed. Compared to angioplasty, primary stenting resulted in lower in-hospital mortality (4% vs. 0%; P = 0.01) and reduced rates of repeat percutaneous or surgical revascularization (7% vs. 0%; P = 0.0009). At 1-year follow-up, stenting was associated with a lower death rate (6.25% vs. 0%; P = 0.002) and reduced repeat infarct artery revascularization (11% vs. 27%; P = 0. 001). Initial hospitalization costs were higher in the stent group ($11,818 +/- $3,377 vs. $9,723 +/- $8,661; P = 0.014) due primarily to catheterization laboratory-related expenditures ($7,346 +/- $2, 395 vs. $3,567 +/- $1,212; P = 0.0001). However, the cumulative 1-year medical cost difference between the two groups was not significant ($13,938 +/- $5,939 vs. $12,914 +/- $9,308; P = 0.33). Following thrombolytic therapy, primary infarct artery stenting reduced in-hospital and 1-year mortality and revascularization rates compared to angioplasty. Stenting was associated with higher initial hospital costs, which were off-set by lower revascularization rates, resulting in comparable total hospitalization costs after 1 year. These findings have important clinical and economic implications in an increasingly cost-conscious health care environment. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 49:135-141, 2000.     

Long-term outcome after primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

The objective of the present prospective multicenter case-control study was to investigate the long-term clinical outcome (5 years) of primary stenting compared to primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) without stenting (POBA) in patients with acute myocardial infarction at 7 cardiovascular centers in Hokkaido, Japan. Forty-one patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with successful primary stenting (stent group: case) and paired with 41 matched control subjects with acute myocardial infarction treated by successful primary PTCA without stenting (POBA group: control) were analyzed. After 1 year, the stent group had a lower incidence of the combined clinical endpoint (death, rehospitalization due to congestive heart failure, nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat angioplasty, CABG, or cerebrovascular events) compared to the POBA group (17.1% versus 39.0%, P = 0.049). After 5 years, the incidences of congestive heart failure and cardiac death were the same in both groups. However, compared to the POBA group, the stent group had a lower combined clinical endpoint (34.1% versus 61.0%, P = 0.027). The Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves of the stent group showed a significantly lower occurrence of clinical events compared to the POBA group (P = 0.0116). Multiple logistic regression analysis of clinical events identified age > or = 69 years (P = 0.0092, odds ratio = 4.179) and stenting (P = 0.0158, odds ratio = 0.279) as explanatory factors. Compared with POBA, primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction results in a better long-term clinical outcome.     

Frequency,determinants, and clinical implications of residual intracoronary thrombus following primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

The presence of intracoronary thrombus after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) worsens clinical outcomes. We performed this study to assess the incidence of intracoronary thrombus after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the clinical impact of nonocclusive thrombus. In 2,148 patients enrolled in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI)-2, Stent PAMI, and PAMI No-Surgery-On-Site trials, we compared clinical and angiographic characteristics of 131 patients (6%) who had angiographically visible thrombus after PCI with those who did not (n = 2,017). In the subset of 2,115 patients with post-PCI Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 2 or 3 flow, we assessed the impact of post-PCI thrombus (n = 110) on in-hospital, 1-month, and 1-year outcomes (reinfarction, ischemic target vessel revascularization [I-TVR], death, and major adverse cardiovascular events [MACEs] [i.e., death, reinfarction, or I-TVR]). Lack of stent use, presence of thrombus before PCI, and no history of PCI were independent correlates of post-PCI thrombus. Patients with nonocclusive thrombus after PCI had more reinfarctions during the index hospitalization (5.5% vs 2.0%, p = 0.03) and at 1 month (6.8% vs 2.3%, p = 0.01) and had nonsignificantly higher I-TVR (during hospitalization 5.5% vs 2.8%, p = 0.13; at 1 month 5.9% vs 3.4%, p = 0.17), but similar mortality and MACE rates as those without post-PCI thrombus. In multivariate analysis, post-PCI thrombus was not a significant predictor of in-hospital or 1-month reinfarction. At 1 year, clinical outcomes were similar between patient groups (reinfarction 8.3% vs 4.7%, p = 0.14; I-TVR 12.5% vs 12.1%, p = 0.91; death 5.9% vs 5.0%, p = 0.68; and MACEs 21% vs 18%, p = 0.54). We conclude that residual intracoronary thrombus after primary angioplasty is relatively uncommon. In patients who achieve TIMI 2 or 3 flow after PCI, intracoronary thrombus is associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes. However, differences in outcomes between patients with and without residual thombus are related to baseline clinical differences rather than thrombus per se.     

Coronary stenting for failed angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction

Intracoronary stents were implanted in 15 patients after unsuccessful PTCA in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The stented vessel was the left anterior descending (LAD) in 11 patients, the right coronary artery (RCA) in 3 patients, and a venous bypass graft to the LAD in a single patient. A total of 16 stents were implanted (15 Palmaz-Schatz, Johnson and Johnson; and 1 Wiktor, Medtronic). Follow-up: 1 patient died 10 days after stent implantation as a result of renal failure and cardiogenic shock. Subacute thrombosis occurred in 2 patients, 5 and 15 days after stent implantation; both underwent successful emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The remaining 12 patients were free from major ischemic events (death, AMI, and further revascularization) after a mean follow-up of 18.7 ± 4.1 months. We conclude that the long-term results of intracoronary stenting in AMI after failed PTCA are favourable. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.