Recurrence of IgA nephropathy among renal allograft recipients from living donors is greater among those with zero HLA mismatches

BACKGROUND: Risk factors contributing to recurrence of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) after transplantation are unclear. Some (but not all) series have suggested greater degrees of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching play a role. METHODS: Using registry data including all kidney transplants performed in Australia and New Zealand between 1987 and 2004 we examined IgAN recurrence among living donors with zero HLA-mismatches. RESULTS: Of 1354 grafts performed in recipients with IgAN, live donors (LDs) accounted for 488 including 108 with zero HLA-mismatches. Biopsy-proven IgAN recurrence was reported for 110 (7%) of grafts overall, but 17% of those who received zero HLA-mismatched LD grafts (HR for recurrence free graft survival 2.7 [95% CI 1.5-5.1], P=0.001). There was no significant difference in recurrence rates between zero and >or=1 HLA-mismatched grafts from cadaveric donors (CDs). Recurrence of IgAN was associated with worse graft survival, more so among LD recipients (HR 8.5 [4.8-15.2], P<0.001) than CD recipients (HR 4.5 [2.6-7.5], P<0.001). However, there was no difference in graft survival between zero and >or=1 HLA mismatched LD recipients whose native disease was IgAN. In contrast, zero HLA mismatched recipients of kidneys with other primary renal disease enjoyed a graft survival advantage. No difference in recurrence rates was seen among those with HLA B12, B35 or DR4. CONCLUSIONS: The increased rates of IgAN-related graft loss among zero HLA-mismatched LD recipients counterbalance the advantage normally seen among zero HLA-mismatched recipients. However, since graft survivals are similar, there is no reason to avoid donor-recipient pairs with zero HLA-mismatches in this setting.     

Renal transplantation in patients with primary immunoglobulin A nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Opinions on the clinical course and outcome of renal transplantation in patients with primary immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) have been controversial. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-centre study on 542 kidney transplant recipients over the period 1984-2001. Long-term outcome and factors affecting recurrence in recipients with primary IgAN were analysed. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (13.8%) had biopsy-proven IgAN as the cause of renal failure, and their mean duration of follow-up after transplantation was 100 +/- 5.8 months. Fourteen (18.7%) of the 75 patients had biopsy-proven recurrent IgAN, diagnosed at 67.7 +/- 11 months after transplantation. The risk of recurrence was not associated with HLA DR4 or B35. Graft failure occurred in five (35.7%) of the 14 patients: three due to IgAN and two due to chronic rejection. Three (4.9%) of the 61 patients without recurrent IgAN had graft failure, all due to chronic rejection. Graft survival was similar between living-related and cadaveric/living-unrelated patients (12-year graft survival, 88 and 72%, respectively, P = 0.616). Renal allograft survival within the first 12 years was better in patients with primary IgAN compared with those with other primary diseases (80 vs 51%, P = 0.001). Thereafter, IgAN patients showed an inferior graft survival (74 vs 97% in non-IgAN patients, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested that around one-fifth of patients with primary IgAN developed recurrence by 5 years after transplantation. Recurrent IgA nephropathy in allografts runs an indolent course with favourable outcome in the first 12 years. However, the contribution of recurrent disease to graft loss becomes more significant on long-term follow up.     

Risk factors for graft loss in patients with recurrent IGA nephropathy after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: The recurrence rate of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) in transplanted kidneys has been reported to be >50%. Although recurrent IgAN has a benign clinical course, recent data suggest that it leads to graft loss in a substantial number of patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of 34 renal transplant recipients, with biopsy-proven IgAN as the cause of end-stage renal failure. RESULTS: Renal allograft biopsies were performed in 30 patients, of whom 24 did and 6 did not have biopsy-confirmed recurrent transplant IgAN. Recurrent transplant IgAN was more often detected in men and at later timepoints after post-transplantation. Four patients with recurrent transplant IgAN progressed to graft failure. Progression to graft failure was associated with worsened renal function, higher systolic blood pressure, and the lack of presenation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEs) at the time of allograft biopsy. Immunologic factors such as frequency of acute rejection, HLA typing, and immunosuppression did not show a relation to recurrence or graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent transplant IgAN increased with long-term graft survival and risk factors for graft loss due to recurrent IgAN were similar to those among IgAN in native kidneys.     

Role of splenectomy in renal transplantation

One hundred sixteen renal transplants in 99 patients were reviewed. Patients were divided into four groups: 53 live donor recipients with pretransplant splenectomy, 13 nonsplenectomized live donor recipients, 20 cadaver recipients with splenectomy, and 30 nonsplenectomized cadaver recipients. Nonsplenectomized live donor recipients had fewer rejection episodes per month of graft function (p < 0.005). Serum creatinine in functioning grafts showed no differences between splenectomized and nonsplenectomized patients. In 73 splenectomized patients there were 14 related septic and/or thromboembolic complications, 6 fatal. Mean daily azathioprine dosage was greater in splenectomized patients (p < 0.005). There were no hyperacute rejections of second transplants in splenectomized patients, while 2 occurred in 8 nonsplenectomized patients. Splenectomy prior to renal transplantation did not decrease the number of rejection episodes per month of graft function and was associated with a higher rate of septic and thromboembolic complications.     

Impact of recurrent disease and chronic allograft nephropathy on the long‐term allograft outcome in patients with IgA nephropathy

Although recurrent IgA nephropathy (IgAN) may lead to graft dysfunction after transplantation, donation from living related donor (LRD), with whom the risk of recurrence may be higher, is not a contraindication. Herein, we evaluated the natural history of allograft in recipients with IgAN and the risk factors influencing long‐term allograft outcome. Recurrence rate and graft survival were assessed retrospectively in 221 IgAN patients, including transplants from 139 LRDs (62.9%). Ten‐year cumulative rate for recurrent IgAN was 30.8%. The operation at younger age and donation from LRD were significant for the recurrence by multivariate analysis. Ten‐year graft survival was affected by recurrent IgAN (61.0% in recurrent IgAN group vs. 85.1% in nonrecurrent, P < 0.01). However, transplants from LRDs did not show poor graft survival when compared with those from other types of donors. In transplants from LRDs, the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was lower than those in grafts from deceased donors (10.8% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.05). When CAN was considered in addition to recurrence, the variance of graft survival was affected significantly by the development of CAN than by the recurrence. These results suggest that the detection and adequate management of CAN could improve graft outcome in transplant recipients with IgAN.     

Does angiotensin blockade influence graft outcome in renal transplant recipients with IgA nephropathy?

BACKGROUND: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a frequent cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and recurrent disease causes deterioration and graft loss in transplant recipients. No definitive management is known to reduce the risk or severity of recurrent IgAN, and the evidence to support the use of renin-angiotensin system blockade in such patients is limited. METHODS: All 1137 renal transplants performed at the Belfast City Hospital over a 27-year period were reviewed. A total of 75 patients with ESRD due to biopsy-proven IgAN were identified; 39 of them had been prescribed an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin-II type I receptor blocker (ARB). RESULTS: The two groups were well-matched in terms of demographic details, immunosuppressive regimens and duration of follow-up (median 65 months, range 18-261 months). The 5- and 10-year graft survivals were higher in those prescribed ACEi/ARB therapy compared with those who were not, although these differences did not reach statistical significance (92.9 vs 86.5%; P = 0.34 and 81.6 vs 72.7%; P = 0.32, respectively). These results were similar when censored for death with a functioning graft. In the group where an ACEi/ARB was not prescribed, all four with biopsy-proven recurrent IgAN progressed to ESRD, compared with three out of nine in the group treated with an ACEi/ARB. CONCLUSIONS: In transplant recipients with ESRD due to biopsy-proven IgAN, a trend towards improved 5-year and 10-year graft survival was seen in those prescribed ACEi/ARBs. All with recurrent IgAN in their grafts who were not treated with ACEi/ARB therapy progressed again to ESRD.     

Chronic rejection: the next major challenge for pancreas transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE: With newer immunosuppressive agents, acute rejection and graft loss resulting from acute rejection have become less common for pancreas transplant recipients. As long-term graft survival rates have improved, an increasing number of grafts are being lost to chronic rejection (CR). We studied the incidence of CR and identified risk factors. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all cadaver pancreas transplants performed at the University of Minnesota between June 19, 1994, and December 31, 2002. We determined the causes of graft loss, the incidence of graft loss to CR and, using multivariate techniques, the major risk factors for CR. RESULTS: A total of 914 cadaver pancreas transplants were performed in the following three categories: simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) (n=321), pancreas after kidney (PAK) (n=389), and pancreas transplant alone (PTA) (n=204). The mean recipient age was 41.3 years and the mean donor age was 30.1 years. Of the 914 pancreas grafts, 643 (70.3%) continue to function (mean length of follow-up, 39 months). The most common cause of graft loss was technical failure, accounting for 118 (12.9%) of the failed grafts. The second most common cause was CR, accounting for 80 (8.8%) of the failed grafts. The incidence of graft loss to CR was highest for PTA (n=23 [11.3%]) and PAK (n=45 [11.6%]) recipients and lowest for SPK recipients (n=12 [3.7%]) (P=0.002). By multivariate analysis, the most significant risk factors for graft loss to CR were a previous episode of acute rejection (relative risk [RR]=4.41, P<0.0001), an isolated (vs. simultaneous) transplant (PAK or PTA [vs. SPK], RR=3.02, P=0.002), cytomegalovirus infection posttransplant (RR=2.41, P=0.001), a retransplant (versus primary transplant) (RR=2.27, P=0.004), and one or two (vs. zero) antigen mismatches at the B loci (RR=1.68, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: As short-term pancreas transplant results improve and as isolated (PAK or PTA) pancreas transplants gain in popularity, CR will become increasingly common as a cause of pancreas graft loss.     

Results in 158 consecutive cadaveric renal transplantations

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the outcome of deceased donor kidney transplantations performed in a single center in a developing country. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 158 patients (69 male and 89 female patients, including 32 children) received kidney grafts obtained from deceased donors between March 1996 and October 2004. Cadaveric renal grafts were transplanted after a cold ischemia time of 4 to 24 hours (mean, 12.5 hours). Retransplantation was performed in 19 recipients. Induction immunosuppression was achieved with antithymocyte globulin. The diagnosis of acute graft rejection was based on histopathological findings. RESULTS: Primary graft function was observed in 77% of cases. Posttransplantation complications were: surgical (n = 60; 38%), systemic bacterial and viral infections (n = 33; 21%), acute rejection (n = 47; 30%), and malignancy (n = 2; 1.3%). Seventeen recipients died with a functioning graft, and 23 more grafts were lost. The 7-year actuarial survival rates were 89% and 75% for recipients and grafts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The kidney transplantation program in Kuwait is steadily growing. Kidney grafts obtained from deceased donors contributed 28% of the transplantation activity and were associated with a high rate of primary function. Overall actuarial recipient and graft survival rates were comparable to those reported by larger centers.     

The influence of acute rejection on long-term renal allograft survival: a comparison of living and cadaveric donor transplantation

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether recipients of living donor grafts who suffer an acute rejection progress to graft loss because of chronic rejection at a slower rate than recipients of cadaveric grafts. METHODS: A retrospective review was made of 296 renal transplantations performed at Mount Sinai Hospital. Only grafts functioning for at least 3 months were included in this analysis. Demographic variables of donor and recipient age, race, sex, and serum creatinine at 3 months after transplantation were compared between groups. RESULTS: Among the acute rejection-free cohort, the estimated 5-year graft survival was 90% for those receiving transplants from living relatives and 88% for those receiving cadaveric transplants (P=0.76). However, in grafts with early acute rejection, the 5-year survival was 40% for cadaveric recipients compared with 73% for living related graft recipients (P<0.014). Using the proportional hazards model, cadaveric donor source, older donor age, African American recipient race, and elevated 3-month serum creatinine were independent predictors of long-term graft loss caused by chronic rejection. The severity of acute rejection and recipient age had no impact on the risk of graft loss because of chronic rejection. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the benefit of living related transplantation results from the fact that a living related graft progresses from acute to chronic rejection at a slower rate than a cadaveric graft. Furthermore, a cadaveric graft that is free of acute rejection 3 months after transplantation has an equal likelihood of functioning at 5 years as that of a graft from a living related donor.     

Risk factors and outcome of focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis recurrence in adult renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence of nephrotic syndrome (NS) after renal transplantation for primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a frequent and still unpredictable complication. However, risk factors for recurrence have not yet been clearly identified. METHODS: Data from 33 patients who underwent 35 renal transplantations for FSGS in two French centres are reported. RESULTS: Recurrent NS occurred in 12 transplant recipients (34%). A significantly higher number of patients in the group with recurrence (R group) compared with the group without recurrence (NR group) received cyclosporine for FSGS treatment before transplantation (83.3% vs 43.4%, P<0.02). Donors of R group recipients were significantly older than those of the non-NR group recipients (42.8 years vs 35 years, P<0.05). A higher number of patients from the R group required post-transplantation dialysis (33.3% vs 17.4%, P = 0.002). Surprisingly, acute rejection occurred more frequently in patients of the NR group compared with the R group, although the difference was not significant. Among the 12 patients with NS relapse, 9 were treated with plasmapheresis. Graft loss related to recurrence occurred in 6 cases. The 5-year graft survival was significantly lower in patients with recurrent NS compared with patients without recurrence (57% vs 82%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the benefit to identify in the future clinical or biological predictive risk factors for NS recurrence after renal transplantation. It also indicates that donor age is a reliable risk factor for recurrence in adult recipients and suggests for the first time a possible opposite relationship between recurrent FSGS and acute rejection.     

The impact of recurrence of primary glomerulonephritis on renal allograft outcome

Twenty‐yr patient and death‐censored graft survival of 348 kidney transplant recipients with primary glomerulonephritis (GN) and of 696 matched controls were 82.2% in GN patients and 75% in controls (p = 0.037) and 49.5% and 54%, respectively (p = 0.013). GN patients had a higher incidence of graft failure than controls even considering death as a competing risk (p = 0.004). In the GN group, graft survival of deceased and of living donor recipients was similar. At multivariate analysis, GN as primary disease (RR: 1.47), delayed graft function recovery (RR: 2.34), acute rejection (RR: 2.36), and any PRA positivity (RR: 1.01) were predictive of graft loss. GN recurred in 85 of 348 grafts (24.4%), and 43 were lost for recurrence. In non‐recurrent patients, graft survival at 20 yr was significantly better than in recurrent patients (59.4% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.000), but not different from that of controls (59.4 vs. 54%, p = 0.9). At multivariate analysis, young age at transplantation (RR: 0.97), shorter duration of dialysis (RR: 1.05 per each dialysis year), and graft from living donors (RR: 1.668) were independent predictors of recurrence. Patients with primary GN have reduced graft survival in comparison with controls, and this is mainly due to recurrence of original disease. However, the most frequent recurrence in living recipients does not compromise graft survival.     

The impact of recurrent glomerulonephritis on graft survival in recipients of human histocompatibility leucocyte antigen-identical living related donor grafts.

BACKGROUND: Graft loss due to rejection is uncommon after human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-identical living related donor (LRD) transplantation, resulting in an excellent long-term graft survival. Data on the impact of recurrence of the original disease on graft survival after LRD transplantation are scarce. METHODS: We have studied the influence of recurrent glomerulonephritis in adult recipients of a human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-identical LRD graft transplanted in our center in the period from 1968 to 1996. To that end, the data of 33 patients with proven or suspected primary glomerulonephritis and 27 patients with nonglomerular diseases were analyzed. RESULTS: The patient survival was similar in both groups at 5, 10, and 20 years. The functional graft survival, i.e., graft survival after censoring for death, was, however, significantly worse for patients with glomerulonephritis as underlying disease (P<0.01). At 5 years graft survival was 100% vs. 88%, at 10 years 100% vs. 70%, and at 20 years 100% vs. 63%, respectively. Thus none of the patients with nonglomerular diseases lost a graft, whereas eight grafts were lost in the group of patients with glomerulonephritis. The main cause of graft loss in this patient group was recurrent glomerulonephritis (n=5), whereas chronic vascular rejection caused graft loss in two patients and occlusion of a transplant artery was the cause in one. A clinically significant proteinuria was detected in six more patients in the glomerulonephritis group: a recurrent glomerulonephritis was diagnosed in four patients and in two patients there was no biopsy. The cumulative incidence of recurrence was as high as 45% at 12 years after transplantation. CONCLUSION: Recipients of a human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-identical LRD kidney have a good prognosis with respect to graft survival. After censoring for death, recurrent glomerulonephritis is the main cause of graft failure in these patients and the impact of recurrent disease on graft survival will become even more prominent with longer follow-up.     

Recurrent IgA nephropathy after renal transplantation

Recurrence of the original disease is now the third most frequent cause of allograft loss at 10 years after transplantation in patients with underlying glomerulonephritis. IgA nephropathy (IgAN), the most common type of glomerulonephritis, histologically recurs in up to 60% of the patients. Initially considered to be a relatively benign phenomenon, several studies, which included a total of almost 1200 patients with underlying IgAN, have now established that after a mean follow up of 5 years, approximately 13% of the patients will exhibit some recurrence-related renal graft dysfunction and approximately 5% will have lost their graft as a result of recurrent IgAN. The only established predictor of graft loss is the time elapsed since renal transplantation. The risk of recurrence-associated graft loss increases to approximately 25% if a prior graft has already been lost as a result of recurrent IgAN. Whether living, related donor kidneys are at higher risk for recurrence is controversial. Despite all these issues, graft survival in patients with underlying IgAN compared with patients with other renal diseases is excellent. In patients with recurrent IgAN, no specific therapy other than optimal supportive care has been established.     

ABO-incompatible live donor renal transplantation using blood group A/B carbohydrate antigen immunoadsorption and anti-CD20 antibody treatment

BACKGROUND: Blood group ABO-incompatible live donor (LD) renal transplantation may provide a significant source of organs. We report the results of our first 14 cases of ABO-incompatible LD renal transplantation using specific anti-A/B antibody (Ab) immunoadsorption (IA) and anti-CD20 monoclonal Ab (mAb) treatment. PATIENTS AND TREATMENT PROTOCOL: Recipients were blood group O (n = 12), A (n = 1) and B (n = 1). Donors were A1 (n = 2), A2 (n = 3), A2B (n = 1) and B (n = 8), and all were secretor positive. Anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Ab panel reactivity was negative in all recipients except one. All recipients were pre-treated with 3 to 6 IA sessions, using A or B carbohydrate antigen columns, until their anti-A1/B RBC panel indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) titers were < or =8. CDC crossmatch was negative in all cases. Recipients received preoperative mycophenolic acid, and steroids/tacrolimus were started at transplantation. No splenectomy was performed. Eight recipients received one dose of anti-CD20 mAb (rituximab, 375 mg/m2) pre-operatively and 11 recipients had postoperative protocol IA. RESULTS: In the initial protocol, anti-CD20 mAbs were used only for recipients receiving A1 grafts. One B graft (HLA-identical donor, 84% panel reactivity) was lost in a severe anti-B Ab-mediated acute rejection. Subsequently, the protocol included anti-CD20 for recipients of both A1 and B grafts and postoperative protocol IA to all recipients. The subsequent 10 grafts had excellent function, giving a total graft survival of 13/14 (observation range 2 to 41 months). At 1 yr, mean serum creatinine was 113 micromol/l (n = 8) and mean glomerular filtration rate was 55 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 24 to 77). In the remaining five cases, with less than 1 yr follow up, mean serum creatinine was 145 micromol/l at 2 to 9 months follow up. Pre-IA anti-A/B titers were in the range of 2 to 32 (NaCl technique) and 16 to 512 (IAT). More than 90 IA sessions were performed in 14 recipients without any significant side effects. Recipient anti-A/B titers returned after transplantation to pre-IA levels or slightly lower. Postoperative renal biopsies were performed in 10 patients. In the 13 patients with long-term function, one patient experienced cellular rejection (Banff IIB) at 3 months without anti-B titer rise. This rejection was concomitant with low tacrolimus plasma levels and was easily reversed by steroids. In 8 of 10 cases, C4d staining was positive in peritubular capillaries. CONCLUSION: Blood group ABO-incompatible LD renal transplantation using A and B carbohydrate-specific IA and anti-CD20 mAbs has excellent graft survival and function.     

The effect of donor age, recipient age, and HLA match on immunologic graft survival in cadaver renal transplant recipients.

We retrospectively analyzed 526 primary cadaver recipients transplanted at a single center to identify pretransplant variables that predict long-term survival with multivariate analysis. All recipients received at least three random blood transfusions and were treated under a quadruple-therapy protocol consisting of ALG, azathioprine, prednisone, and cyclosporine. Of 526 consecutive transplants, 86 grafts were lost from acute or chronic rejection. Thirteen grafts were lost for nonimmunologic reasons and 35 recipients died with a functioning graft. A total of 273 patients (52%) experienced at least one episode of acute rejection. Donor age ranged from 3 to 64 years, with 62% of donors less than 30 years of age and 9% of donors over 50 years of age. Donor age was not predictive of long-term graft survival and neither was the difference between donor and recipient age. Recipient age was predictive of subsequent immunologic graft less, with younger recipients at greater risk (P = 0.011). The rate of first rejection was also inversely related to recipient age, with younger recipients rejecting earlier (P = 0.0001). The degree of DR mismatch was the only other significant predictor of long-term graft success (P = 0.013). Transplant survival correlated with the degree of DR mismatch: 2 DR mismatch was the worst, 1 DR mismatch was intermediate and 0 DR mismatch was the best (P = 0.02). A, B, AB, and BDR did not influence long-term graft outcome. In our center, donor age does not predict graft failure. Younger recipients have a higher rate of early rejection and, combined with a poor DR match, are at higher risk for long-term graft failure.     

Expanding the living related donor pool in renal transplantation: use of marginal donors

PURPOSE: In a living related transplantation program it is not always possible to find an ideal donor. Sometimes the only available donor in the family has some benign disease or suboptimal renal anatomy or physiology, or is too old to be accepted and defined as a marginal donor. However, with proper screening the donor pool can be increased by accepting these marginal donors and treating the benign diseases which is beneficial to the donor. We evaluate the outcome of grafts from marginal donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1988 to August 1997, 581 live related transplantations were performed. Of the donors 52 were older than 60 years and 34 had associated benign renal or nonrenal anomaly or disease. These donors were accepted after thorough questioning and consultation with family members. The recipients of graft from elderly donors were evaluated for the number of rejections, serum creatinine at last followup and graft survival. RESULTS: Of the recipients 52 received grafts from elderly donors with a mean age of 62.6+/-3.7 years. Mean followup was 34.14+/-0.7 months. The 2 and 5-year actuarial graft survival was 96% and 74%, respectively. Creatinine was normal (less than 1.5) in 37% of recipients and 1.5 to 2.5 mg.% in 46%. The rejection rate in postoperative month 1 was 29%. All donors underwent simultaneous surgery to treat the benign disease, and all did well after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: By accepting these marginal donors a 14.6% increase in the living related donor pool was achieved without compromising recipient or donor safety. Otherwise these recipients would have been forced to undergo unrelated transplantation or be maintained on dialysis, which is particularly difficult in a developing country. Donors with associated disease benefited from cure.     

Long-term outcome of renal transplantation in focal glomerulosclerosis

INTRODUCTION: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) has a tendency to recur frequently after kidney transplantation. We evaluated 12 cases to examine the incidence and long-term outcomes of recurrent FSGS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with renal failure caused by FSGS received kidney allografts from living related donors. Tacrolimus or cyclosporine was used in combination with prednisolone and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. RESULTS: The mean graft survival was 87.4 +/- 46.8 months. The graft survival rates in FSGS recipients were at 1 year, 100%; 5 years, 79.6%; 10 years, 68.2%. Two out of four recipients experienced graft loss due to chronic rejection. The other two out of four recipients with graft loss displayed severe proteinuria diagnosed as recurrence of FSGS. To treat recurrent FSGS, plasma exchange was partially effective to reduce proteinuria. CONCLUSION: Our incidence of recurrent FSGS is 16.7% with graft survivals at 5 and 10 years of 79.6% and 68.2%, respectively. The recurrence of FSGS happened after scheduled reductions in immunosuppressants. Careful observation is required with maintenance of immunosuppression in these patients.     

A single institution, randomized, prospective trial of cyclosporin versus azathioprine-antilymphocyte globulin for immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients.

Between September 26, 1980 and December 31, 1983, 230 splenectomized, transfused renal allograft recipients were randomized to treatment with either cyclosporin-prednisone (N = 121, 68 diabetic and 53 nondiabetic recipients; 73 cadaver and 48 related donor grafts) or azathioprine-prednisone-antilymphocyte globulin (N = 109, 61 diabetic and 48 nondiabetic recipients; 69 cadaver and 40 related donor grafts). The results were analyzed on March 31, 1984. Actuarial patient survival rates at 2 years were 88% in the cyclosporin and 91% in the azathioprine groups (p = 0.649). Graft survival rates at 2 years were 82% in all cyclosporin and 77% in all azathioprine-treated recipients (p = 0.150); the corresponding figures in the recipients of related donor grafts were 87% vs. 83% (p = 0.656), and in the recipients of cadaver donor grafts were 78% vs. 73% (p = 0.178). The 2-year graft survival rates were 81% in cyclosporin and 74% in azathioprine-treated diabetic recipients (p = 0.150) and 83% in cyclosporin and 81% in azathioprine-treated nondiabetic recipients (p = 0.604). Within the cyclosporin and azathioprine treatment groups, the differences in graft survival rates between diabetic and nondiabetic recipients were not significant (p = 0.822 and 0.423, respectively). Although there were no significant differences in graft survival rates, the cumulative incidence of rejection episodes within the first post-transplant year was significantly lower in the cyclosporin (34%) than in the azathioprine (60%) treated recipients (p = 0.001). In recipients of technically successful cadaver kidney grafts, the incidence of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) was 31% in cyclosporin and 30% in azathioprine-treated recipients (p = 0.822). Graft survival rates in azathioprine- and cyclosporin-treated recipients who did or did not undergo ATN were 72% vs. 89% (p = 0.011). The mean (+/- S.D.) serum creatinine levels (mg/dl) at 1 year were higher in cyclosporin (2.0 +/- 0.6) than in azathioprine (1.5 +/- 0.5) treated recipients (p = less than 0.001). A reduction in cyclosporin dose because of nephrotoxicity was required in 96 of the cyclosporin-treated patients (70%), and 25 were switched to treatment with azathioprine (21%). The incidence of all infections in cyclosporin-treated patients was approximately half of that in azathioprine-treated patients, and only nine per cent of the cyclosporin-treated patients were diagnosed to have cytomegalovirus infections during the first post-transplant year vs. 28% in azathioprine-treated patients (p = 0.002).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Early and late recipient graft function and donor outcome after laparoscopic vs open adult live donor nephrectomy for pediatric renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopically procured live donor kidney grafts are increasingly transplanted into pediatric recipients. The safety and efficacy of this changed surgical practice are unknown. HYPOTHESIS: Outcomes of laparoscopic vs open donor grafts in recipients 18 years and younger are equivalent. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective review at an academic tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: Eleven consecutive pediatric recipients of laparoscopically procured kidneys between April 1, 1997, and December 31, 2001, were pair matched for age with 11 recipients of openly procured kidneys between December 1, 1991, and March 31, 1997; the 22 adult donors were also studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recipients: surgical complications, graft function and survival. Donors: perioperative morbidity and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Twenty (91%) of 22 kidneys were donated by a parent of the recipient. In recipients of laparoscopically procured grafts, we observed significantly lower creatinine clearances and higher creatinine levels on days 1, 4, and 6, but by 1 month, graft function was similar in both groups. No significant differences in surgical complications, delayed function, acute and chronic rejection, and graft survival rates were found. No laparoscopic or open donor required blood transfusion, reoperation, or hospital readmission. One laparoscopic donor (9%) was converted to open nephrectomy. For laparoscopic vs open donors, median operative time was longer (difference, 67 min; P =.08), but median postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter (3 vs 5 days; P =.02). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has no adverse impact on pediatric recipient outcomes. For donors, the laparoscopic operation is safe and the hospital stay is shortened. These results support the continued use of laparoscopically procured live donor kidneys in pediatric renal transplantation.     

Risk factors on graft survival of living donor kidney transplantation

Living donors have always been the basic resources of transplantation in our country, where cadaveric harvesting is still hampered for various reasons. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare graft survival rates between living unrelated donor (LURD) and living related donor (LRD), to assess the potential risk factors for the graft survival, and to discuss the role of LURD. METHOD: From October 1991 to February 2003, 77 living donor renal transplants were performed: 41 were LURD and 36 were LRD transplants. The analyzed variables were donor relationship, recipient age and sex, donor age and sex, HLA-DR mismatching, nonspecific blood transfusion history of donor, acute rejection episodes, repeated rejection episode (more than 3 times), delayed graft function, recurred primary disease, and immunosuppressive regimen. Graft survival rate was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method and the significance of possible variables with the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Eleven recipients lost their grafts (6 from LURD and 5 from LRD), most of them are due to chronic rejection (n = 7). Overall 3-, 5- and 10-year graft survival in live donors were 92.8%, 86.6%, and 76.9%, respectively. Graft survival at 3, 5, and 10 years being 91.9%, 88.5%, and 74.7% for the LURD versus 94%, 84%, and 78.8% for LRD transplants (P > .05). Acute rejection episodes, especially more than 3 times (risk ratio [RR] = 11.1) and preoperative multiple transfusion history (RR = 4.2) were significant factors on graft survival in our series. CONCLUSION: Acute rejection episodes markedly decreased the long-term graft survival in live donor renal transplants. The use of LURD transplants provides graft survival comparable with LRD transplants and proper management to acute rejection is essential for long-term graft survival.