Long-term retention rates of new antiepileptic drugs in adults with chronic epilepsy and learning disability

We compared the long-term retention rates of several newly licensed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in a residential community of adults with chronic epilepsy and learning disability. Data relating to duration of therapy, maximum dose, and tolerability of six new AEDs-gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), tiagabine (TIA), and topiramate (TPM)-were collected. Drug retention at 2 years was 85% (OXC), 57% (LTG), 56% (LEV), 45% (TPM), 24% (TIA) and 15% (GBP). OXC was used mainly as a substitute for carbamazepine. LTG, LEV, and TPM were all associated with retention rates higher than those of GBP or TIA. TPM had the highest rate of adverse event development at the maximum tried dose (60%), whereas LEV had the lowest (16%). Experience from this single epilepsy community study indicated limited impact for GBP or TIA but higher retention of OXC, LEV, LTG, and TPM in patients with chronic epilepsy and learning disability.     

Comparative retention rates and long-term tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs.

OBJECTIVE: Retention rates of five new anti-epileptic medications (AEDs) were compared in order to evaluate their long-term tolerability and efficacy. METHOD: We acquired the retention data on levetiracetam (LEV), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), topiramate (TPM), and zonisamide (ZNS) from the electronic database. The data included patient's age, gender, seizure type, current and previous medications, dosage, main reasons for discontinuation, and duration of therapy. The retention rates of these AEDs were evaluated at 4, 12, 24, 52, and 104 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 828 new AED exposures were obtained (LEV=196, LTG=251, OXC=97, TPM=156, ZNS=128) from patients with partial or generalized epilepsy. At 2 years, retention rate was highest with LTG (74.1%), followed by ZNS (60.2%), OXC (58.8%), LEV (53.6%), and TPM (44.2%). When these AEDs were discontinued, it was mainly due to inefficacy (29.5%) and sedating side-effects (20.5%), and commonly within 6 months into therapy. Several important AED specific side-effects leading to discontinuation were identified, including behavioral or irritability from LEV, rash from LTG and OXC, nausea from OXC and ZNS, hyponatremia from OXC, and kidney stones from TPM and ZNS. CONCLUSION: Comparing retention rates of new AEDs can provide useful insight into their tolerability and efficacy. This study showed highest retention rate with LTG, which was significantly different from ZNS (p=0.0025), LEV (p<0.0001), OXC (p=0.0024), and TPM (p<0.0001). Beside ineffectiveness, other leading causes of discontinuation were adverse behavioral effects with LEV, rash with LTG and OXC, and sedation for TPM and ZNS.     

Characteristics of patients initiated on the new antiepileptic drugs: a PADS study

Whereas randomized controlled trials remain a standard for evaluating and comparing efficacy and safety of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), postmarketing drug research offers a useful means of comparing efficacy and safety of new AEDs. However, differences in baseline characteristics of patients in different drug groups create the potential for bias in drug comparison studies. In this study, baseline demographic characteristics of 1,386 patients initiating lamotrigine (LTG), tiagabine (TGB), or topiramate (TPM) were compared to identify patient characteristics that may influence AED use in epilepsy patients. Data were collected at 14 epilepsy centers and included medications, seizure types and syndromes, and prior adverse events. There were 402 patients in the LTG group, 725 TPM, and 259 TGB. The groups differed both in their number of concurrent AEDs (p<0.001) and in their number of prior AEDs (p<0.01). There was no difference in proportion with partial versus generalized epilepsy syndromes. The groups differed in the proportions of patients with complex partial seizures (p=0.049), primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (p=0.01), and myoclonic seizures (p=0.03). Baseline behavioral adverse event rate was lowest in patients initiating TPM (p<0.01); LTG patients had the lowest rate of prior AED-related rash (p=0.02). There was no relationship between AED assignment and patient age, age of epilepsy onset, epilepsy duration, institutionalization status, gender, or psychiatric history. Numerous epidemiological differences were identified among patients placed on the new AEDs, including current and prior AED profiles, seizure types, and prior adverse event history. Accounting for these differences is of crucial importance because they may bias conclusions of nonrandomized post-marketing trials comparing the drugs.     

An In Vitro Study of New Antiepileptic Drugs and Astrocytes

Summary:  Purpose: The aim of our research was to study some biochemical modifications elicited in primary rat astrocyte cultures by treatment with gabapentin (GBP), carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM), oxcarbazepine (OXC), tiagabine (TGB), and levetiracetam (LEV), commonly used in the treatment of epilepsy. We investigated the biologic effects of these anticonvulsants (AEDs) at concentrations of 1, 10, 50, and 100 μg/ml.
Methods: The study was performed by examining cell viability (MTT assay), cell toxicity [lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release in the medium], glutamine synthetase (GS) activity, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, lipoperoxidation level (malondialdehyde; MDA), and DNA fragmentation (COMET assay). The level of the expression of 70-kDa heat-shock protein (HSP70) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) as oxidative stress–modulated genes also was determined.
Results: Our experiments indicate that CBZ, TPM, and OXC induce stress on astrocytes at all concentrations. GBP, LTG, TGB, and LEV, at low concentrations, do not significantly change the metabolic activities examined and do not demonstrate toxic actions on astrocytes. They do so at higher concentrations.
Conclusions: Most AEDs have effects on glial cells and, when used at an appropriate cell-specific concentrations, may be well tolerated by cortical astrocytes. However, at higher concentrations, GBP, LTG, TGB, and LEV seem to be better tolerated than are CBZ, TPM, and OXC. These findings may reveal novel ways of producing large numbers of new AEDs capable of reducing the extent of inflammation, neuronal damage, and death under pathological conditions such as epilepsy and/or traumatic brain injury.     

Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs: what can we learn from long‐term studies?

OBJECTIVE: A review of long-term open-label studies was performed with the aim of detecting differences in efficacy and/or tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). METHODS: From more than 500 open studies conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), pregabalin (PGB), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM) or zonisamide (ZNS), we selected all studies that reported or allowed us to calculate the number of patients who achieved seizure freedom for 6 months and/or the number of patients withdrawing for adverse effects and/or the number or percentage of patients continuing treatment after 1 year. RESULTS: No studies were found in which this information was available for OXC, PGB, TGB or ZNS. The number of patients who achieved seizure freedom for 6 months was reported in four studies each for GBP and TPM, five studies for LTG, and eight studies for LEV. The best efficacy profile using this end point was found for LEV, followed by TPM, LTG, and GBP. Twenty-two studies reported the number of patients withdrawing due to adverse effects. LEV was the best-tolerated AED, a little ahead of LTG, and significantly better than GBP or TPM . TPM was by far the least well-tolerated drug. Information concerning patients continuing treatment after 1 year was reported in two GBP studies, two TPM studies, six LEV studies and five LTG studies. GBP had a very low retention rate (between 20% and 25% of patients continued the drug), while TPM and LTG had a retention rate of 40-60% and LEV had a retention rate of 60-75%. CONCLUSION: One limitation of these rankings is that their statistical value is limited because of the indirect nature of the comparisons. Anyhow, this review covers the main studies published thus far on this subject and provides full updated information on the current literature about these drugs.     

Gabapentin versus lamotrigine monotherapy: a double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy

PURPOSE: This randomised, double-blind study compared the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) gabapentin (GBP) and lamotrigine (LTG) as monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy. METHODS: Patients with partial seizures with and/or without secondary generalization or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures were randomized to either GBP or LTG. During 2- and 6-week titration periods, respectively, GBP dosage reached 1,800 mg/day, and LTG, 150 mg/day. In the subsequent 24-week maintenance phase, the dose could be adjusted based on seizure control or adverse events between 1,200 and 3,600 mg/day for GBP and 100 and 300 mg/day for LTG. The primary end point was time to exit, a composite of efficacy and tolerability. Evaluable patients were used for the primary efficacy analysis, whereas tolerability was examined on an intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients was randomized, and 291 (148 GBP, 143 LTG) were included in the evaluable population. Nineteen patients in each group had an exit event. The median time to exit was 69 days for GBP and 48 days for LTG. The hazard ratio was estimated as 1.043 (90% confidence intervals, 0.602-1.809). Overall, 106 (71.6% of the evaluable population) GBP-treated and 96 (67.1%) LTG-treated patients completed the study. Of those, 80 (75.5%) patients taking GBP and 73 (76.0%) taking LTG remained seizure free during the final 12 weeks of treatment. Only 14 (8.9%) GBP-treated patients and 15 (9.9%) LTG-treated patients withdrew because of study drug-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: GBP and LTG monotherapy were similarly effective and well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.     

Long-term retention rates of lamotrigine, gabapentin, and topiramate in chronic epilepsy

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the long-term retention rates of lamotrigine (LTG), gabapentin (GBP), and topiramate (TPM) therapy for patients at a tertiary referral clinic for chronic, refractory epilepsy. METHODS: We analyzed 424 consecutive patients with chronic, refractory partial and/or generalized epilepsy who were started on LTG, 158 patients who were started on GBP, and 393 patients who were started on TPM. The percentages of patients who continued therapy with LTG, GBP, and TPM were estimated with the use of Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Factors that influence retention were analyzed with the use of Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that at 3 years, 30% continued therapy on TPM compared with 29% on LTG and fewer than 10% on GBP. Adverse events resulted in therapy withdrawal in 40% of patients on TPM compared with GBP (37%) and LTG (22%). Perceived lack of efficacy led to treatment withdrawal in 39% of patients on GBP compared with 34% on LTG and 19% on TPM. Cox regression estimated that a fourth or fewer of patients with chronic partial epilepsy are likely to continue therapy with a new antiepileptic drug beyond 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of these new antiepileptic drugs on the long-term course of chronic partial epilepsy is likely to be small, as approximately three of four patients will discontinue therapy. More patients appear to continue on TPM compared with LTG or GBP, with a possible reason being better perceived efficacy of TPM, despite having the highest incidence of adverse events.     

7-Nitroindazole potentiates the anticonvulsant action of some second-generation antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced seizure model

Summary. The effects of 7-nitroindazole (7NI, a preferential neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitor) on the anticonvulsant activity of four second-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs: felbamate [FBM], lamotrigine [LTG], oxcarbazepine [OXC] and topiramate [TPM]) were studied in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced seizure (MES) model. Moreover, the influence of 7NI on the acute neurotoxic (adverse-effect) profiles of the studied AEDs, with regard to motor coordination, was determined in the chimney test in mice. Results indicate that 7NI (50 mg/kg; i.p.) significantly potentiated the anticonvulsant activity of OXC, but not that of FBM, LTG and TPM against MES-induced seizures and, simultaneously, it enhanced the acute neurotoxic effects of TPM, but not those of FBM, LTG and OXC in the chimney test in mice. 7NI at the lower dose of 25 mg/kg had no effect on the antiseizure activity and acute neurotoxic profiles of all investigated AEDs. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of interactions between 7NI and LTG, OXC and TPM against MES-induced seizures revealed no significant changes in free (non-protein bound) plasma AED concentrations following 7NI administration. Moreover, none of the examined combinations of 7NI with AEDs from the MES test were associated with long-term memory impairment in mice subjected to the step-through passive avoidance task. Based on our preclinical study, it can be concluded that only the combination of 7NI with OXC was beneficial, when considering its both anticonvulsant and acute neurotoxic effects. Moreover, the lack of impairment of long-term memory and no pharmacokinetic interactions in plasma of experimental animals make the combination of 7NI with OXC worthy of consideration for the treatment of patients with refractory epilepsy. The other combinations tested between 7NI and LTG, FBM and TPM were neutral, when considering their both anticonvulsant effects and acute neurotoxic profiles, therefore, no useful recommendation can be made for their clinical application.     

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between common antiepileptic drugs and acetone, the chief anticonvulsant ketone body elevated in the ketogenic diet in mice

Purpose:   Acetone is the principal ketone body elevated in the ketogenic diet (KD), with demonstrated robust anticonvulsant properties across a variety of seizure tests and models of epilepsy. Because the majority of patients continue to receive antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during KD treatment, interactions between acetone and AEDs may have important clinical implications. Therefore, we investigated whether acetone could affect the anticonvulsant activity and pharmacokinetic properties of several AEDs against maximal electroshock (MES)–induced seizures in mice.
Methods:   Effects of acetone given in subthreshold doses were tested on the anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), topiramate (TPM) and valproate (VPA) against MES-induced seizures in mice. In addition, acute adverse effects of acetone–AEDs combinations were assessed in the chimney test (motor performance) and passive avoidance task (long-term memory). Pharmacokinetic interactions between acetone and AEDs were also studied in the mouse brain tissue.
Results:   Acetone (5 or 7.5 mmol/kg, intraperitoneally [i.p.]) enhanced the anticonvulsant activity of CBZ, LTG, PB, and VPA against MES-induced seizures; effects of OXC, PHT, and TPM were not changed. Acetone (7.5 mmol/kg) did not enhance the acute adverse-effect profiles of the studied AEDs. Acetone (5 or 7.5 mmol/kg, i.p.) did not affect total brain concentrations of the studied AEDs. In contrast, VPA, CBZ, LTG, OXC, and TPM significantly decreased the concentration of free acetone in the brain; PB and PHT had no effect.
Conclusions:   Acetone enhances the anticonvulsant effects of several AEDs such as VPA, CBZ, LTG, and PB without affecting their pharmacokinetic and side-effect profiles.     

An Overview of the Efficacy and Tolerability of New Antiepileptic Drugs

Summary: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of recently developed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), a systematic review of placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the AEDs as add-on therapy in refractory partial epilepsy was conducted. Two or more RCTs meeting our inclusion criteria were found for gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), vigabatrin (VGB), and zonisamide (ZNS). The outcome selected for estimation of efficacy was the proportion of patients experiencing a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline. Tolerability was estimated on the basis of rates of patient withdrawal from study for any reason. Efficacy and tolerability odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for each measure were generated for each trial included in the analysis, and overall efficacy and tolerability ORs were calculated for each AED across all trials and drug dosages evaluated. Because 95% CIs for both efficacy and tolerability overlapped for the six drugs, conclusive evidence of between-drug differences in effectiveness or safety were not obtained from the analysis. However, the data suggest that the drug with the highest OR for efficacy (TPM) may be approximately twice as effective as the AED with the lowest OR for efficacy (GBP), and that the treatment that appears to most frequently cause withdrawal (ZNS) may be about four times more likely to do so that the AED with the lowest withdrawal rate (LTG). RCTs comparing newer AEDs with the older standard drugs and with each other are needed to further evaluate their relative utility.     

The use of lamotrigine, vigabatrin and gabapentin as add-on therapy in intractable epilepsy of childhood.

PURPOSE: Lamotrigine (LTG), vigabatrin (VGB) and gabapentin (GBP) are three anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) used in the treatment of children with epilepsy for which long-term retention rates are not currently well known. This study examines the efficacy, long-term survival and adverse event profile of these three agents used as add-on therapy in children with refractory epilepsy over a 10-year period. METHODS: Three separate audits were conducted between February 1996 and September 2000. All children studied had epilepsy refractory to other AEDs. Efficacy was confirmed if a patient became seizure free or achieved >50% reduction in seizure frequency for 6 months or more after starting therapy. Adverse events and patient survival for each drug were recorded at the end of the study period. RESULTS: Between September 1990 and February 1996, 132 children received LTG, 80 VGB and 39 GBP. At the 10-year follow-up audit, 33% of the children on LTG had a sustained beneficial effect on their seizure frequency in contrast to 19% for VGB and 15% for GBP. No significant difference in efficacy was found in children with partial seizures. Children with epileptic encephalopathy (EE) including myoclonic-astatic epilepsy and Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) achieved a more favorable response to LTG. The main reasons for drug withdrawal were lack of efficacy for VGB, apparent worsening of seizures for GBP and the development of a rash for LTG. CONCLUSIONS: Lamotrigine is a useful add-on therapy in treating children with epilepsy. It has a low adverse event profile and a sustained beneficial effect in children with intractable epilepsy.     

Preclinical profile of combinations of some second-generation antiepileptic drugs: an isobolographic analysis

PURPOSE: The need for an efficacious treatment of patients with intractable seizures is urgent and pressing, because approximately 30% of epilepsy patients worldwide are still inadequately medicated with current frontline antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). This study sought to determine the interactions among some newer AEDs [topiramate (TPM), felbamate (FBM), oxcarbazepine (OXC), and lamotrigine (LTG)] in the maximal electroshock-induced seizures (MES) and chimney test (motor performance) in mice, by using the isobolographic analysis. METHODS: Evaluation of the anticonvulsant and acute adverse (neurotoxic) effects in mice produced by the AEDs in combinations at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 allowed the assessment of their preclinical profile and the determination of benefit indices (BIs) for all individual combinations. RESULTS: Combinations of TPM+FBM at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 offered supraadditive (synergistic) interactions against electroconvulsions and subadditivity (antagonism) in terms of acute neurotoxic effects in the chimney test (BIs ranged between 1.90 and 2.59, the best combinations from a preclinical point of view). The examined combinations of TPM+OXC also were advantageous due to synergistic interactions in the MES, and additivity in terms of acute neurotoxic effects produced by the AEDs (BIs ranged between 1.35 and 1.71). In contrast, OXC+FBM exerted subadditive (antagonistic) interactions in the MES test and additive interactions in terms of acute motor impairment of animals (BIs ranged between 0.53 and 0.71). The worst combination was observed for OXC+LTG, at the fixed ratio of 1:1, displaying subadditivity (antagonism) against electroconvulsions and supraadditivity (synergy) with respect to neurotoxicity (BIs, 0.43). The remaining combinations of OXC+LTG tested (i.e., 1:3 and 3:1) exerted additivity in the MES test and supraadditivity in the chimney test (BIs 0.54 and 0.49, respectively). None of the studied AEDs affected the brain concentrations of other AEDs, so the existence of any pharmacokinetic interactions to be responsible for the observed effects is improbable. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current preclinical data, the pharmacological profile of combinations of TPM+FBM and TPM+OXC evaluated with isobolography was beneficial and might be worth recommendation to further clinical practice. In contrast, utmost caution is required during the use of OXC+FBM or OXC+LTG in clinical practice, because of the high risk of neurotoxic adverse effect appearance.     

Clinical Efficacy of New Antiepileptic Drugs in Refractory Partial Epilepsy: Experience in the United States With Three Novel Drugs

Summary: A number of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), including topiramate (TPM), felbamate (FBM), and gabapentin (GBP), are approved or believed to be close to approval for marketing in the United States. Key efficacy findings for these AEDs in refractory partial epilepsy were reviewed. Large and significant drug-placebo differences were observed with TPM in two large dose-finding trials conducted in the United States. The minimal effective dose of TPM in the population studied was determined to be approximately 200 mg/day, and doses above 600 mg/day produced good efficacy but little incremental benefit versus the lower dosages for the overall study population. FBM is active in partial epilepsy, although seizure reduction is less marked and drug interactions complicate the findings. GBP is also active in this population, but only the 1,800 mg/day dosage was significantly better than placebo with respect to percent re-sponders. It may be useful to explore higher dosage ranges for both FBM and GBP if they can be well tolerated.     

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction studies of loreclezole with felbamate, lamotrigine, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure model

PURPOSE: The study investigated the types of interactions between loreclezole (LCZ) and a variety of newly licensed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with different mechanisms of actions [felbamate (FBM), lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM), and oxcarbazepine (OXC)] by isobolographic analysis. METHODS: Anticonvulsant and adverse-effect profiles of combinations of LCZ with other AEDs at fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 were investigated in the maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizures and the chimney test (as a measure of motor impairment) in mice so as to identify optimal combinations. Protective indices (PIs) and benefit indices (BIs) were calculated so that a ranking in relation to advantageous combinations could be established. RESULTS: With isobolography, it was observed that the combination of LCZ and TPM, at the fixed ratios of 1:1 and 3:1, was supraadditive (synergistic; p < 0.05), whereas LCZ with TPM at the fixed ratio of 1:3 and LCZ combined with LTG, FBM, or OXC at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 were associated with additive interactions. Moreover, the isobolographic analysis in the chimney test revealed that only one combination tested (LCZ and TPM at the fixed ratio of 1:1) was subadditive (antagonistic; p < 0.05), whereas the remaining combinations of LCZ with LTG, FBM, or OXC (at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1) barely displayed additivity. However, these combinations were associated with significant pharmacokinetic interactions, in that LCZ increased brain TPM (94%), OXC (21%), FBM (46%), and LTG (8%) concentrations. In addition, brain LCZ concentrations were decreased by TPM (26%), OXC (37%), LTG (42%), and FBM (19%). None of the examined combinations between LCZ and TPM, OXC, LTG, and FBM altered long-term memory in the step-through passive-avoidance task. CONCLUSIONS: LCZ plus TPM appears to be a particularly favorable combination, based on the MES test and the chimney test. LCZ and OXC also is a favorable combination. However, these conclusions are confounded by the fact that LCZ is associated with significant pharmacokinetic interactions.     

拉莫三嗪与奥卡西平单药治疗成人新诊断局灶性癫痫的长期疗效及安全性比较

目的 比较拉莫三嗪(LTG)和奥卡西平(OXC)单药治疗成人新诊断局灶性癫痫的长期疗效、耐受性和安全性。方法 收集本院癫痫专病门诊新诊断的局灶性癫痫,随机分成OXC组和LTG组,根据临床情况调整剂量,OXC最大剂量1200 mg/d,LTG最大剂量300 mg/d,至少随访3年,评估二种药物单药治疗成人新诊断局灶性癫痫无发作率、保留率及不良反应。结果 2009年6月-2016年6月符合入组标准146例,其中OXC组74例,LTG组72例,2组1年无发作率分别为35.1%和51.3%(χ2=3.9,P=0.047),3年无发作率分别为21.6%和40.2%(χ2=5.96,P=0.015),LTG组总体无发作率高于OXC组(P<0.05); OXC组和LTG组1年保留率分别为59.5%和69.4%(χ2=1.59,P=0.208),3年保留率分别为44.6%和51.4%(χ2=0.68,P=0.411),LTG组总体保留率亦高于OXC组,但无明显差异(P>0.05)。OXC组和LTG组最常见的不良反应均为皮疹(6.8% vs. 8.3%)。结论 LTG单药治疗新诊断成人局灶性癫痫的长期无发作率高于OXC,两者不良反应较轻,有较好的安全性。     

The Long-Term Use of Gabapentin, Lamotrigine, and Vigabatrin in Patients with Chronic Epilepsy

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term retention of gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), and vigabatrin (VGB) by patients with chronic epilepsy and the reasons for treatment discontinuation. To assess the likelihood of seizure freedom, seizure-related injury/hospital admission and mortality after these drugs were commenced. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-records survey in five tertiary referral epilepsy centres in the U.K. The retention times on treatment (from initiation to discontinuation) for the different antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were compared by using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression. Incidences of seizure freedom and seizure-related injury/hospital admissions and standardised mortality ratios were calculated. RESULTS: There were 1,375 patients with chronic epilepsy included; 361 were taking GBP, 1,050 LTG, and 713 VGB. The retention of GBP, LTG, or VGB was <40% at 6 years. Fewer than 4% of patients become seizure free while taking one of the drugs. There was no reduction in mortality or seizure-related injury/admission. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of these new AEDs on chronic epilepsy can be described only as modest. This view may be revised, however, as more experience is gained with new drugs in previously untreated patients.     

新型和传统抗癫痫药治疗新诊断癫痫患者的评价

目的评价新型和传统抗癫痫药(AEDs)单药治疗新诊断癫痫患者的疗效及安全性。方法前瞻性收集143例新诊断癫痫患者,分为卡马西平(CBZ)、丙戊酸钠(VPA)、托吡酯(TPM)和拉莫三嗪(LTG)治疗组,其中CBZ用于癫痫部分性发作,VPA用于癫痫全面性发作,而TPM和LTG用于各种类型癫痫发作,至少观察1年。采用生存分析Kaplan-Meier法比较治疗后癫痫初次发作时间、治疗失败时间,同时比较各组患者达"6月、1年无发作"比例和药物不良反应。结果 4组AEDs单药治疗后至癫痫初次发作时间、治疗失败时间的差异均无统计学意义(P0.05);CBZ、VPA、TPM和LTG组"6月无发作"率分别为80%、78%、87.9%、63.3%(均P0.05);"1年无发作"率分别为70%、66%、66.7%、50%(均P0.05)。TPM组不良反应率为63.3%,高于CBZ组(20%)、VPA组(24%)(均P0.01),而LTG组不良反应率为16.7%,与CBZ、VPA组相当(均P0.05)。结论从疗效和安全性综合考虑,新型AEDs治疗癫痫并不优于传统AEDs,其中TPM轻、中度不良反应还明显高于传统AEDs。     

Pharmacological outcomes in newly diagnosed epilepsy

The response to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has been examined in 780 adult and adolescent patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy presenting with a range of seizure types and epilepsy syndromes over a 20-year period. Carbamazepine (CBZ, n=312), sodium valproate (VPA, n=315), and lamotrigine (LTG, n=249) were the most common AEDs prescribed as monotherapy. More patients with localization-related epilepsies became seizure free with LTG (63%) than with CBZ (45%, P=0.006) or VPA (42%, P=0.006). For idiopathic generalized epilepsies a greater proportion of patients achieved control with VPA (68%) than with CBZ (31%) or LTG (45%). In particular, more patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy responded to VPA (75%) compared with LTG (39%, P=0.014). Seizure freedom was achieved with modest or moderate daily doses (median CBZ 400mg, VPA 1000 mg, (LTG) 150 mg) of all three AEDs in the majority of patients achieving remission. Time to first seizure did not differ among these three drugs when given as first treatment. Adverse effects leading to withdrawal were more frequent with CBZ (16%) than with VPA (7%, P=0.03) or LTG (7%, P=0.018). In patients failing initial monotherapy, response to a combination of two AEDs (27%) was not different from that with alternative monotherapy (32%). The majority of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy responding to treatment did so rapidly and completely with moderate doses of AEDs, with no differences in time to first seizure.     

传统抗癫痫药物和妥泰对成年癫痫患者生活质量的影响

目的 评价传统抗癫痫药物和妥泰对成年癫痫患者生活质量的影响。方法 102例临床新确诊的成年癫痫患者被随机分为两组：一组予以传统抗癫痫药物单药系统治疗(AEDs组)，另一组予以妥泰单药治疗(TPM组)。1个月后比较两组的发作频率和不良反应。并用QOLIE-30表对这102例癫痫患者进行生活质量评定。结果 TPM组的发作频率和不良反应均明显低于AEDs组，而生活质量总分明显高于AEDs组，尤其在前五项的评分中更加明显。结论 TPM能提高癫痫患者的生活质量，其改善生活质量的作用主要是通过控制发作和减轻不良反应实现的。