Impact of prior portosystemic shunt procedures on outcome of liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Cirrhotic patients may require portosystemic shunts as treatment for complications of portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to asses how these procedures may influence the orthotopic liver transplantation procedure and its outcome. METHODS: Forty-five patients with a previous portosystemic shunt were divided into 3 groups (group 1, 19 with a portocaval shunt; group 2, 4 with a mesocaval shunt and 5 with a distal splenorenal shunts; group 3, 17 with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt). Forty-five patients without a shunt, matched for age, gender, pretransplant liver status, and year of transplantation, were selected as controls. Surgical time, transfusional requirement, intensive care unit and total hospital duration of stay, complications, retransplantation rate, and short- and long-term mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: Group 1 showed a significantly longer surgical time, higher red blood cell transfusional requirements, longer intensive care unit and hospital stay, and greater short and long-term mortality than the controls. No significant differences were observed between groups 2 and 3 and the controls. CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhotic patients, surgically created portosystemic shunts involving the hepatic hilum have a negative impact on liver transplantation. This operation should be avoided in potential liver transplant candidates; surgical shunts that do not compromise the hepatic hilum or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts are preferred.     

Distal splenorenal shunt: preferred treatment for recurrent variceal hemorrhage in the patient with well-compensated cirrhosis

HYPOTHESIS: Distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) is a safe and effective treatment for patients with Child-Pugh class A and B cirrhosis with recurrent variceal hemorrhage after failed transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Hepatobiliary surgery and liver transplantation department in a tertiary referral medical center. PATIENTS: Between August 1, 1985, and May 1, 2005, 119 patients with Child-Pugh class A and B cirrhosis underwent DSRS for recurrent variceal hemorrhage. Of these, 17 (14.3%) had thrombosed or failing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt prior to DSRS. INTERVENTION: Distal splenorenal shunt for recurrent variceal hemorrhage after failure of conservative management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity, mortality, and subsequent liver transplantation rate. RESULTS: The overall perioperative morbidity rate was 31.5%. Thirteen patients (11.7%) developed encephalopathy and 6 (5.4%) had recurrent variceal hemorrhage. Other complications included portal vein thrombosis, pancreatitis, pancreatic pseudocyst, pneumonia, and wound infection. The 30-day operative mortality rate was 6.4% (n = 7). The 1-year survival rate was 85.9%. The incidence of DSRS for failed transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt during the first 12 years of the study (1985-1997) was 11.1% (9/81). This proportion increased to 26.7% (8/30) during the second half of the study (1997-2005). During the 20-year period, 15 patients (13.5%) underwent liver transplantation a mean of 5.1 years after DSRS without an increase in morbidity or mortality after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Distal splenorenal shunt may be the preferred treatment for recurrent variceal hemorrhage in the patient with well-compensated cirrhosis. In addition, DSRS does not cause increased morbidity or mortality in subsequent liver transplantation.     

Distal splenorenal shunt: role, indications, and utility in the era of liver transplantation

HYPOTHESIS: The distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) continues to play an important role in the management of recurrent variceal bleeding with minimal negative impact on subsequent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Hepatobiliary surgery and liver transplantation unit in a tertiary referral medical center. PATIENTS: From August 1, 1985, through October 31, 1997, a single team of surgeons performed 81 DSRS procedures for recurrent variceal hemorrhage. Eleven patients undergoing OLT subsequent to DSRS were compared with a group of 274 patients undergoing OLT without any previous shunt during the same period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative time, use of blood products, length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, and survival rates. RESULTS: Operative (30-day) mortality for DSRS was 6% (n = 5). From follow-up information available for 74 patients, the 1- and 5-year survival rates were 86.4% (n = 64) and 74.3% (n = 55), respectively. Recurrent variceal bleeding and hepatic encephalopathy occurred in 5 (6.8%) and 11 patients (14.9%), respectively, after DSRS. In 9 patients, DSRS was used as salvage for failed transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. CONCLUSIONS: Distal splenorenal shunt is a safe, durable, and effective treatment for controlling recurrent variceal hemorrhage in patients with acceptable operative risk and good liver function. It does not compromise future liver transplantation and can considerably delay the time until transplantation is required. Given the early occlusion rate and need for constant surveillance, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting should be reserved for patients with Child C classification cirrhosis with chronic hemorrhage or intractable ascites or as an emergency procedure for patients with uncontrollable bleeding using endoscopic therapy.     

Misplacement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: A surgical challenge for liver transplantation?

BackgroundThe impact of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt misplacement on outcomes of liver transplantation remains controversial. We systematically reviewed the literature on the outcomes of liver transplantation with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt misplacement.MethodsThis systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Cochrane library, PubMed, and Embase were searched (January 1990–April 2020) for studies reporting patients undergoing liver transplantation with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt misplacement.ResultsThirty-six studies reporting 181 patients who underwent liver transplantation with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt misplacement were identified. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was misplaced with a variable degree of extension toward the inferior vena cava/right heart in 63 patients (34%), the spleno/portal/superior mesenteric venous confluence in 105 patients (58%), and both in 15 patients (8%). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt thrombosis was also present in 21 cases (12%). The median interval between transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement and liver transplantation ranged from 1 day to 6 years. Complete transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt removal was successfully performed in all but 12 (7%) patients in whom part of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was left in situ. Cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass was necessary to remove transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt from the right heart in 4 patients (2%), and a venous graft interposition was necessary for a portal anastomosis in 5 patients (3%). Postoperative mortality (90 days) was 1.1% (2 patients), and portal vein thrombosis developed postoperatively in 4 patients (2%).ConclusionMisplaced transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt removal is possible in most cases during liver transplantation with extremely low mortality and good postoperative outcomes. Preoperative surgical strategy and intraoperative tailored surgical technique reduces the potential consequences of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt misplacement.     

Role of surgical portosystemic shunts in the era of interventional radiology and liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: In the present era of liver transplantation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, the role and choice of shunt surgery for portal hypertension was reviewed. METHODS: This retrospective study analysed the management of patients with portal hypertension in a tertiary liver transplant unit between June 1993 and May 2002. During this 9-year interval, 394 patients underwent endoscopic control of varices, 235 transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts were inserted, 1142 liver transplants were performed, while only 29 patients needed a surgical portosystemic shunt. RESULTS: Twenty-nine shunt operations were performed in nine patients with cirrhosis, one patient with congenital hepatic fibrosis and 19 without parenchymal liver disease. There were 12 side-to-side lienorenal, nine mesocaval, three proximal lienorenal, two distal lienorenal, two portacaval and one mesoportal shunts. Encephalopathy was seen in five of 11 patients with a non-selective shunt, but did not occur after side-to-side or selective lienorenal shunt procedures. At a median follow-up of 42.5 months, one mesocaval shunt had thrombosed and one portacaval shunt had stenosed; both were successfully managed by percutaneous intervention. To date, six patients have died; two succumbed to postoperative complications, one of which was related to the shunt. CONCLUSION: Patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome and cirrhosis can nearly always be managed by a combination of endoscopy, interventional radiology and liver transplantation. In the rare instances when these therapies fail in patients with cirrhosis, a side-to-side lienorenal shunt is a good option.     

The changing spectrum of treatment for variceal bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of endoscopic therapy, liver transplantation, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on patient selection and outcome of surgical treatment for this complication of portal hypertension, as reflected in a single surgeon's 18-year experience with operations for variceal hemorrhage. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Definitive treatment of patients who bleed from portal hypertension has been progressively altered during the past 2 decades during which endoscopic therapy, liver transplantation, and TIPS have successively become available as alternative treatment options to operative portosystemic shunts and devascularization procedures. METHODS: Two hundred sixty-three consecutive patients who were surgically treated for portal hypertensive bleeding between 1978 and 1996 were reviewed retrospectively. Four Eras separated by the dates when endoscopic therapy (January 1981), liver transplantation (July 1985), and TIPS (January 1993) became available in our institution were analyzed. Throughout all four Eras, a selective operative approach, using the distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS), nonselective shunts, and esophagogastric devascularization, was taken. The most common indications for nonselective shunts and esophagogastric devascularization were medically intractable ascites and splanchnic venous thrombosis, respectively. Most other patients received a DSRS. RESULTS: The risk status (Child's class) of patients undergoing surgery progressively improved (p = 0.001) throughout the 4 Eras, whereas the need for emergency surgery declined (p = 0.002). The percentage of nonselective shunts performed decreased because better options to manage acute bleeding episodes (sclerotherapy, TIPS) and advanced liver disease complicated by ascites (liver transplantation, TIPS) became available (p = 0.009). In all Eras, the operative mortality rate was directly related to Child's class (A, 2.7%; B, 7.5%; and C, 26.1 %) (p = 0.001). As more good-risk patients underwent operations for variceal bleeding, the incidence of postoperative encephalopathy decreased (p = 0.015), and long-term survival improved (p = 0.012), especially since liver transplantation became available to salvage patients who developed hepatic failure after a prior surgical procedure. There were no differences between Eras with respect to rebleeding or shunt occlusion. Distal splenorenal shunts (p = 0.004) and nonselective shunts (p = 0.001) were more protective against rebleeding than was esophagogastric devascularization. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential introduction of endoscopic therapy, liver transplantation, and TIPS has resulted in better selection and improved results with respect to quality and length of survival for patients treated surgically for variceal bleeding. Despite these innovations, portosystemic shunts and esophagogastric devascularization remain important and effective options for selected patients with bleeding secondary to portal hypertension.     

Surgical shunts and TIPS for variceal decompression in the 1990s

BACKGROUND: In the 1990s, liver transplantations and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) have become the most common methods to decompress portal hypertension. This center has continued to use surgical shunts for variceal bleeding in good-risk patients who continue to bleed through endoscopic and pharmacologic treatment. This article reports this center's experience with surgical shunts and TIPS shunts from 1992 through 1999. METHODS: Sixty-three patients (Child A, 43 patients; Child B, 20 patients) received surgical shunts: distal splenorenal, 54 patients; splenocaval, 4 patients; coronary caval, 1 patient; and mesocaval, 4 patients. Sixty-two patients had refractory variceal bleeding, and 1 patient had ascites with Budd-Chiari syndrome. Two hundred patients (Child A, 24 patients; Child B, 62 patients; Child C, 114 patients) received TIPS shunts. One hundred forty-nine patients had refractory variceal bleeding, and 51 patients had ascites, hydrothorax, or hepatorenal syndrome. Data were collected by prospective databases, protocol follow-up, and phone contact. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 0% for surgical shunts and 26% for TIPS shunts; the overall survival rate was 86% (median follow-up, 36 months) for surgical shunts and 53% (median follow-up, 40 months) for TIPS shunts. For surgical shunts, the portal hypertensive rebleeding rate was 6.3%; the overall rebleeding rate was 14.3%. For TIPS shunts, the overall rebleeding rate was 25.5% (30-day, 9.4%; late, 22.4%). There were 4 reinterventions for surgical shunts (6.3%); the reintervention rate for TIPS shunts in the bleeding group was 33%, and the reintervention rate in the ascites group was 9.5%. Encephalopathy was severe in 3.1% of the shunt group and mild in 17.5%; this was not systematically evaluated in the TIPS shunts patients. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical shunts still have a role for patients whose condition was classified as Child A and B with refractory bleeding, who achieve excellent outcomes with low morbidity and mortality rates. TIPS shunts have been used in high-risk patients with significant early and late mortality rates and have been useful in the control of refractory bleeding and as a bridge to transplantation. The comparative role of TIPS shunts versus surgical shunt in patients whose condition was classified as Child A and B is under study in a randomized controlled trial.     

Percutaneous Retroperitoneal Splenorenal Shunt for Symptomatic Portal Vein Thrombosis After Liver Transplantation

Acute or recurrent bleeding from ectopic varices is a potentially life‐threatening condition in rare patients with extrahepatic complete portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after liver transplantation (LT). In this setting, the role of interventional radiology is very limited and surgical shunts, in particular splenorenal shunts are usually used, despite the high associated mortality. We present the first reports of the clinical use of a new minimally invasive technique, percutaneous retroperitoneal splenorenal shunt (PRESS), in two LT recipients with life‐threatening variceal hemorrhage secondary to PVT. Both patients had a successful PRESS using a transplenic approach with resolution of bleeding, avoiding the need for a potentially complicated laparotomy. The PRESS procedure is a useful addition to the interventional armamentarium that can be used in cases unsuitable for surgical shunt, and refractory to endoscopic management. In the future, this technique may be an alternative to surgical shunts as the standard procedure in patients with extra‐hepatic PVT, just as the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure has become for the management of portal hypertension in the absence of PVT. Longer‐term follow‐up will be needed to establish the long‐term success of this procedure.     

Current state of portosystemic shunt surgery

BACKGROUND: A switch to decompressive shunt procedures is mandatory if endoscopic therapy fails to control recurrent variceal hemorrhage. Surgical shunt procedures continue to be safe, highly effective, and durable procedures to treat variceal bleeding in patients with low operative risk and good liver function. DISCUSSION: In cirrhotics, elective operations using portal flow preserving techniques such as a selective distal splenorenal shunt (Warren) and a partial portocaval small diameter interposition shunt (Sarfeh) should be preferred. Rarely, end-to-side portocaval shunt may serve as a salvage procedure if emergency endoscopic treatment or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt insertion fails to stop bleeding. Until definitive results from randomized trials are available patients with good prognosis (Child-Pugh A and B) should be regarded as candidates for surgical shunts. For patients with noncirrhotic portal hypertension, in particular with extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis, portosystemic shunt surgery represents the only effective therapy which leads to freedom of recurrent bleeding and repeated endoscopies for many years, and improves hypersplenism without deteriorating liver function or encephalopathy. Gastroesophageal devascularization and other direct variceal ablative procedures should be restricted to treat endoscopic therapy failures without shuntable portal tributaries.     

Acute transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt migration into pulmonary artery during liver transplantation.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt has become an accepted intervention to treat sequelae of end-stage liver disease such as refractory ascites and esophageal varices for patients awaiting liver transplantation. Technical difficulties in such patients at the time of transplantation are usually limited to malpositioning of the stent requiring modification of the usual vascular anastomoses. Migration of the stent intraoperatively has not been a reported complication in the literature. We report a case in which a patient with a previously placed transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt underwent successful liver transplantation complicated by intraoperative migration of the stent into the left pulmonary artery. The stent was removed from the pulmonary artery postoperatively using interventional radiology techniques.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: preliminary results in 25 patients.

A retrospective study of transjugular intrahepatic shunts performed between June 1990 and June 1991 is reported. Twelve patients were actively bleeding at the time of the procedure; 12 other patients had had one to five bleeding episodes within the previous 2 weeks, and one patient had massive ascites from Budd-Chiari syndrome. Most patients had severe liver disease: 21 Child's class C, three Child's class B, and one Child's class A. Transjugular intrahepatic shunting was technically successful in all cases. Portal vein pressures were reduced on average from 36 +/- 7 cm H2O to 22 +/- 6 cm H2O. Variceal bleeding ceased after transjugular intrahepatic shunting in all patients who were actively bleeding. Five patients died (30-day mortality, 20%), and eight patients subsequently underwent elective liver transplantation. The transjugular intrahepatic shunts in the 12 other patients have remained patent an average of 5.5 months. Shunt occlusion occurred in three patients at 21, 24, and 102 days, respectively. All three occlusions were successfully reopened with percutaneous techniques, yielding a primary shunt patency of 88% and secondary shunt patency of 100%. Complications included new onset encephalopathy in one patient, which cleared with medical therapy and transient renal failure in one patient. These preliminary data suggest that transjugular intrahepatic shunting is a safe and effective therapy for the short-term treatment of patients with variceal hemorrhage, particularly in patients with severe liver disease awaiting transplantation. The long-term benefit of transjugular intrahepatic shunting awaits further follow-up.     

Use of splenic artery embolization to relieve tense ascites following liver transplantation in a patient with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.

Recurrent venous thrombosis following liver transplantation for Budd-Chiari syndrome is common, particularly in the setting of an underlying myeloproliferative disorder. We describe a patient who developed refractory ascites due to portal vein thrombosis following liver transplantation for Budd-Chiari syndrome in the setting of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Extensive portal vein thrombosis, dense abdominal adhesions, and portosystemic collaterals precluded the use of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or surgical portosystemic shunt to manage the patient's ascites. Splenic artery embolization to decrease portal hypertension was performed, and this resulted in complete resolution of ascites. This case demonstrates the successful use of splenic artery embolization to manage ascites due to portal vein thrombosis following liver transplantation. Splenic artery embolization may be considered as an alternative option for the management of refractory ascites due to portal hypertension in patients who are unable to undergo safe transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or surgical shunt placement.     

Triple-phase computed tomography and intraoperative flow measurements improve the management of portosystemic shunts during liver transplantation.

Ligation of portosystemic shunts in patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation has been recommended to avoid insufficient portal vein (PV) flow. Shunts are not always recognized pretransplantation because intraoperative PV flow assessment is not routinely attempted. As a result of a posttransplantation PV thrombosis in a recipient with a large portosystemic shunt and a PV flow <1 L/minute, we employed triple-phase computed tomography with vascular reconstruction and intraoperative graft flow measurement to determine the need for inflow modification in our next 16 patients with large portosystemic shunts. Subsequently, 6 patients with large portosystemic shunts and PV flows 相似文献   

Assessment of portosystemic shunt patency and function with magnetic resonance imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in seven patients before and after portosystemic shunting to evaluate venous changes accompanying nonselective and selective shunt construction. The size and number of the intrahepatic portal and hepatic veins, left perirenal veins, and left upper quadrant varices were evaluated at MRI before and after shunt construction. MRI correctly diagnosed patent shunts in all seven patients. A marked decrease in the size of intrahepatic veins after a total or nonselective shunt suggests adequate portal vein and variceal decompression. Dilatation of left perirenal veins in the presence of a patent mesorenal or splenorenal shunt suggests hypertension of the left renal vein and possibly inadequate decompression of esophageal varices.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a nonoperative approach to life-threatening variceal bleeding

Portosystemic venous shunts may be created nonoperatively with a Grüntzig balloon dilatation catheter using the transjugular route. The authors achieved technical success with this shunt in 15 of 20 patients with life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding from variceal hemorrhage. All patients but one were considered at high risk for surgery because of end-stage liver disease; the exception was a patient in whom two previous operative portosystemic shunts had failed. An average decrease of 5.9 mm Hg in portal vein pressure was measured in 11 patients for whom sequential pressures could be obtained. Two patients survived longer than 12 months without subsequent operative procedures, and the shunt helped temporize in three other patients who later underwent operation. Nine patients with successful shunts died within 30 days of the procedure, comparing favourably with reported operative death rates of 40% to 80% in emergency shunt procedures. Follow-up portal venograms demonstrated shunt patency in six of nine patients, in one after 8 months. Tract patency was determined in four of seven patients on whom autopsy was performed, up to 6 months after the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was created.     

Severe venoocclusive disease after liver transplantation treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Venoocclusive disease (VOD) is due to hepatic sinusoidal lining injury leading to portal hypertension; its incidence after liver transplantation is about 2%. When severe, it does not respond to medical therapy and has a high mortality; retransplantation is the only therapeutic option. However, there are no detailed data regarding the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for VOD after liver transplantation. We describe two patients who developed severe VOD after liver transplantation, failed defibrotide therapy, and were treated by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). The portal hypertension resolved completely and one had full histological recovery. We believe that TIPS should be attempted as it may resolve progressive portal hypertension and the hepatic congestion, while allowing the clinician time for listing for further liver transplantation if the patient fails to respond.     

Effect of a prior portasystemic shunt on subsequent liver transplantation.

Fifteen patients who had a prior portasystemic shunt underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. Shunt types were portacaval in six patients, H-graft mesocaval in six, distal splenorenal in two, and proximal splenorenal in one. Mean blood loss and hospital stay were highest in the portacaval group. Retransplants (two patients) and deaths (two patients) also were limited to this group. In this report, technical considerations, advantages, and disadvantages of the various shunt types are described. Management of patients with late stages of portal hypertension must include estimation of the effects of a portasystemic shunt on subsequent liver transplantation. It is concluded that portacaval shunts should be avoided in patients who may be considered for transplantation. Distal splenorenal shunts are best performed in younger patients with intractable variceal bleeding who are not expected to require transplantation in the near future. A mesocaval H-graft is the shunt of choice in patients who are current liver transplant candidates.     

Comparative evaluation of selective and nonselective peripheral portosystemic shunts for treatment of variceal hemorrhage

There is currently available a variety of operative techniques that, by shunting of portal blood into the systemic circulation, decompress esophagogastric varices. Continued evaluation of when to employ a specific type of portosystemic shunt is indicated. This report compares experience with nonselective peripheral portosystemic shunts with selective distal splenorenal shunts. Twenty-nine patients were divided into two operative groups. All patients were operated on for variceal hemorrhage. The two patient groups were similar preoperatively in all parameters evaluated except that the patients having nonselective peripheral shunts had more ascites and four were operated on for acutely bleeding varices, whereas the selective shunt patients had minimal ascites and none were operated on for acute bleeding. Rebleeding rates, incidence of encephalopathy, and long-term survival were not significantly different between the two groups. Eight of 14 (57 percent) patients discharged from the hospital with selective distal splenorenal shunts were alive with a mean follow-up interval of 19 months. Eight of 11 (72 percent) patients discharged with nonselective peripheral shunts were alive with a mean follow-up interval of 34 months. These results suggest that if technical or clinical conditions preclude the performance of a selective distal splenorenal shunt, a nonselective peripheral shunt will produce comparable results and can be used with confidence.     

Liver transplantation in patients with previous portasystemic shunt

Over a 9-year period, 58 patients who had previous portasystemic shunt procedures underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx) under a cyclosporine-steroid immunosuppressive regimen. The types of shunt used were distal splenorenal (18 patients), mesocaval (17 patients), end-to-side portacaval (11 patients), side-to-side portacaval (5 patients) and proximal splenorenal (7 patients). The mean interval between shunt and transplantation was 6 years. There was no statistical difference in survival between patients with previous shunts and the entire population of patients with primary liver transplantation performed during the same period of time. Age, sex, shunt patency, status of portal vein, and use of vein or artery graft did not affect survival. Child's classification had a significant influence on graft survival, even though no difference was subsequently observed in patient survival. A progressively improved intraoperative strategy and the use of veno-venous bypass and University of Wisconsin preservation solution had a significant impact on blood loss, length of operation, length of stay in intensive care unit, and ultimately, on survival. Distal splenorenal and mesocaval shunts with no or minimal hilum dissection are safer shunts if subsequent transplantation is planned; in fact, their 9-year survival was 87%, whereas all other shunts were associated with a survival no better than 52% (p less than 0.006).     

Laparoscopic Division of a Portosystemic Shunt for Recurrent Life-Threatening Rectal Variceal Bleeding: Report of a Case

In patients with severe portal hypertension related to liver cirrhosis, recanalization of umbilical veins may lead to both development and rupture of massive anorectal varices. In this setting, while transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is considered as the treatment of choice, the management of these patients remains unclear in case of contraindications to TIPS. Laparoscopic division of massive portosystemic shunts has been reported to yield beneficial effects in patients with isolated hepatic encephalopathy but has never been attempted in a context of life-threatening lower gastrointestinal bleeding. In the present case report, we both describe the operative technique of laparoscopic division of recanalized umbilical veins to treat recurrent massive haemorrhage following rupture of giant rectal varices in a 68-year-old Child C cirrhotic patient contraindicated to TIPS and report the postoperative course of the patient.