Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures

The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal stability and time course of postoperative changes after surgical correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Combined maxillary and mandibular procedures were performed in 40 consecutive patients. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy stabilized with wire osteosynthesis for mandibular setback and low-level Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with plates and screws for maxillary advancement were performed. Maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) was in place for 6 weeks. Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately postoperatively, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to vertical maxillary movement at surgery: a maxilla-up group with upward movement of the posterior nasal spine of 2 mm or more (group 1, n = 22), and a minimal vertical change group with less than 2 mm of vertical repositioning (group 2, n = 18). The results indicate that surgical correction of Class III malocclusion with combined maxillary and mandibular osteotomies appears to be fairly stable. One year postsurgery, maxillary stability was excellent, with a mean horizontal relapse at point A that represented 10.7% of maxillary advancement in group 1 and 13.4% in group 2. In the vertical plane, maxillary stability was also excellent, with a mean of 0.18 mm of superior repositioning at point A for group 1 and 1.19 mm for group 2. The mandible relapsed a mean of 2.97 mm horizontally at pogonion in group 1 (62% of mandibular setback) and 3.41 mm (49.7% of setback) in group 2. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with wire osteosynthesis and MMF was not as stable as maxillary advancement and accounted for most of the total horizontal relapse (almost 85%) observed. A trend to relapse was observed for maxillary advancement greater than 6 mm, while the single variable accounting for mandibular relapse in group 1 was the amount of surgical setback. Clockwise rotation of the ascending ramus at surgery was not correlated with mandibular relapse in relation to the type of fixation performed and therefore does not seem to be responsible for relapse.     

Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: titanium versus resorbable plates and screws for maxillary fixation.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal stability after double jaw surgery for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion to assess if there were any differences between resorbable plate and screws and titanium rigid fixation of the maxilla. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two Class III patients had bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback stabilized with rigid internal fixation. Low level Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement was stabilized with conventional titanium plate and screws in 12 patients (group 1) and with resorbable plate and screws in 10 patients (group 2). Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately postoperatively, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Before surgery both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. One year after surgery, maxillary stability was excellent in both groups. In group 1 no significant correlations were found between maxillary advancement and relapse. In group 2, significant correlations were found between maxillary advancement and relapse at A point and posterior nasal spine. No significant differences in postoperative skeletal and dental stability between groups were observed. CONCLUSION: Surgical correction of Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures appears to be a fairly stable procedure for maxillary advancements up to 5 mm independently from the type of fixation used to stabilize the maxilla. Resorbable devices should be used with caution for bony movements of greater magnitude until their usefulness is evaluated in studies with large maxillary advancements.     

Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal stability after double-jaw surgery for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion to assess whether there were any differences between wire and rigid fixation of the mandible. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven Class III patients had Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with plate and screws for maxillary advancement. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback was stabilized with wire osteosynthesis and maxillomandibular fixation for 6 weeks in 20 patients (group 1) and with rigid internal fixation in 17 patients (group 2). Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately after surgery, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Before surgery, both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. One year after surgery, maxillary sagittal stability was excellent in both groups, and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy accounted for most of the total horizontal relapse observed. In group 1, significant correlations were found between maxillary advancement and relapse at the posterior maxilla and between mandibular setback and postoperative counterclockwise rotation of the ramus and mandibular relapse. In group 2, significant correlations were found between mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the ramus and between mandibular setback and postoperative counterclockwise rotation of the ramus and mandibular relapse. No significant differences in postoperative skeletal and dental stability between groups were observed except for maxillary posterior vertical position. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical correction of Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures appears to be a fairly stable procedure independent of the type of fixation used to stabilize the mandible.     

Stability after surgical-orthodontic corrective of skeletal Class III malocclusion. 3. Combined maxillary and mandibular procedures

Stability after combined Le Fort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies was reviewed in 51 patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Because vertical changes in the position of the maxilla affect both the vertical and anteroposterior positions of the mandible, the sample was subdivided by the direction of vertical movement of the maxilla at surgery. Excellent postsurgical stability was observed in the long-face Class III patients in whom upward and forward movement of the maxilla was combined with ramus osteotomy to prevent excessive forward rotation of the mandible. When the maxilla was moved forward and the mandible set back with minimal vertical change, moderate relapse tendencies were observed in both jaws, but most of the correction was maintained at 1 year. When the maxilla was moved down and forward while the mandible was set back, moderate vertical relapse of the maxilla and anteroposterior relapse of the mandible followed. Stability of the downward movement of the maxilla was, on average, better than that resulting from maxillary surgery alone.     

Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. 2. Maxillary advancement.

Nearly half the patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion have maxillary deficiency as the major component of their problem, and modern surgical techniques allow maxillary osteotomy to correct the deformity. Changes at surgery and postsurgically were studied in 49 patients who underwent isolated surgical maxillary advancement. Thirty-one had wire osteosynthesis and maxillomandibular fixation, and 18 had rigid fixation with bone plates. In nearly half the patients, the maxilla was moved down as well as forward, indicating that the patient had both vertical and anteroposterior deficiency. In the anteroposterior plane, 80% of the patients had excellent stability at 1 year, while 20% had 2 to 4 mm of posterior movement of anterior maxillary landmarks. There was no difference in anteroposterior stability between wire/maxillomandibular fixation and rigid internal fixation groups. When the maxilla was moved down as well as forward, there was a strong tendency for relapse upward in both fixation groups. As a result, the chin frequently became more prominent from immediate postsurgery to 1-year followup, as upward movement of the maxilla allowed the mandible to rotate upward and forward.     

Stability after rigid fixation of simultaneous maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement osteotomies

The purpose of this study was to investigate the short- and long-term stability of bimaxillary surgery following LeFort I (LF-1) impaction with simultaneous bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) and mandibular advancement using the technique of rigid internal fixation (RIF). In order to assess the postoperative maxillary and mandibular movement pattern in 26 patients with vertical maxillary excess and mandibular deficiency, cephalograms were taken immediately preoperatively, and 1 week, 2 months, and 1 year after surgery. With paired t-test showing no statistically significant postoperative change for the point A of the maxilla from immediate postsurgery to longest follow-up (P> 0.05), the used technique of "RIF LF-I impaction and RIF BSSO advancement" tended to render excellent postsurgical stability in the horizontal (0.1+/-0.8mm mean posterior movement) and vertical (0.1+/-0.5mm mean inferior movement) direction. There was no instance of maxillary relapse of >2mm. Regarding mandibular BSSO advancement, the point B showed a significant vertical upward movement (1.6+/-1.2mm) (P< 0.001) and a slight horizontal forward movement (0.3+/-2.0mm) (P> 0.05) at 1-year follow-up. The incidence of posterior relapse of >2mm accounted for 11.5%. The data confirm the concept that the bimaxillary approach of "LF-I impaction and BSSO advancement" using the described technique of RIF is a stable procedure in the treatment of open bite patients classified as vertical maxillary excess in combination with mandibular deficiency.     

Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. I. Mandibular setback

Postsurgical stability of mandibular setback to correct mandibular prognathism was compared for three approaches: transoral vertical ramus osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with wire osteosynthesis and maxillomandibular fixation, and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with rigid internal fixation via bone screws. In the transoral vertical ramus osteotomy group, the mean postsurgical change in chin position was almost zero, but nearly 50% of the patients did have clinically significant changes in chin position; two thirds of these movements were posterior and one third anterior. In the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy groups, the chin either stayed in its immediately postsurgical position or moved anteriorly. In one fourth of the patients who received maxillomandibular fixation and in nearly half of the patients who received rigid internal fixation, the chin moved forward more than 4 mm.     

Le FortⅠ型骨切开上颌骨整体后退术矫治骨性Ⅱ类上颌骨前突畸形

目的：探讨Le Fort Ⅰ型骨切开（Le Fort Ⅰ osteotomy）上颌骨整体后退术在矫治骨性Ⅱ类上颌骨前突畸形中的价值。方法：对16例骨性Ⅱ类上颌前突患者（上颌骨前突伴下颌骨后缩14例,其中同时伴颏后缩6例;单纯上颌骨前突2例）进行外科-正畸联合治疗。患者治疗前头影测量∠ANB为7.0°～13.1°,平均9.3°。行Le Fort Ⅰ型骨切开上颌骨整体后退术,其中14例同期行双侧下颌支矢状骨劈开术（bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy,BSSRO）前移下颌骨,6例行颏成形术（genioplasty）前移颏部。结果：本组行LeFortⅠ型骨切开上颌骨整体后退4～8mm,14例BSSRO下颌骨前移4～7mm,6例颏成形术颏前移6～8mm。1例一侧腭降动脉术中损伤断裂,经结扎处理,无感染及骨块坏死。16例患者伤口均一期愈合。术后及正畸结束后∠ANB为1.6°～3.5°,平均2.9°。结束治疗后随访6～24个月,牙弓形态及[牙合]曲线正常,牙排列整齐,咬合关系良好,外形明显改善,疗效满意。结论：对于骨性Ⅱ类上颌骨前突畸形患者,Le Fort Ⅰ型骨切开上颌骨整体后退术是一种安全、合理、有效的正颌外科术式。     

Nasal changes after surgical correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in Koreans

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the changes in the nose after bimaxillary surgery to correct skeletal Class III malocclusion and to test the hypothesis that there is no change in the nasal width following bimaxillary surgical correction of skeletal Class III when a nasal cinch is properly used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five adult Korean skeletal Class III patients who had received maxillary advancement/impaction and mandibular set-back surgery in conjunction with an alar base cinch suture were evaluated. The anthropometric variables of the nasal region were measured directly on the soft-tissue surface before and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: After surgery, the alar width and alar base width had increased significantly (P < .001), while the nasal tip projection decreased (P < .001). The nostril morphology also showed widening (P < .001). There was a trend for females with a narrow alar width presurgically to have a larger amount of nasal widening compared with those with a broader alar width (P < .05). CONCLUSION: There is a high probability of nasal and nostril widening after bimaxillary surgery for skeletal Class III malocclusion in Koreans despite the careful performance of alar cinch suture. Nevertheless, the authors believe that alar cinch suture was positive in limiting the nasal widening to the minimum and would consider routine application during bimaxillary surgery for skeletal Class III especially for female patients with a narrow nose who are susceptible to these changes.     

口外前牵引联合颏兜矫治AngleⅢ骨性反牙8例报告

目的总结应用口外前牵引联合颏兜矫治混合牙列期和恒牙早期安氏III类骨性反牙合的效果.方法7-12岁安氏Ⅲ类骨性的反牙合8例,用口外前牵引联合颏兜矫治.结果 上颌骨与上牙弓均有前移,上颌长度增加,A点前移,上切牙唇倾度减小;下切牙舌侧倾斜;上下颌骨矢状关系逐渐趋向正常,凹面型得到改善.结论口外前牵引联合颏兜是矫治混合牙列期和恒牙早期安氏III类骨性反牙的有效方法.     

Stability of simultaneous maxillary intrusion and mandibular advancement: A comparison of rigid and nonrigid fixation techniques

This study examines the short-term stability of bimaxillary surgery following Le Fort I impaction with simultaneous bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular advancement using two standard techniques of postsurgical fixation. Fifteen adults had skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation, and fifteen adults had rigid internal fixation using bone plates in the maxilla and bicortical bone screws between the proximal and distal segments in the mandible. The group with rigid internal fixation did not undergo maxillomandibular fixation. Radiographic cephalograms were analyzed during the postsurgical period to evaluate skeletal and dental stability. There was no statistical difference in postsurgical stability with rigid internal fixation or skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation other than the vertical position of the maxillary molar; the skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation group had a significant amount of postsurgical intrusion of the maxillary molar when compared with the rigid internal fixation group. Although the other measures showed no statistically significant difference between the experimental groups, the amount of variability in postsurgical stability in the group with skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation was greater than that found in the group with rigid internal fixation.     

前方牵引对早期前牙反(牙合)患者软组织侧貌的影响

目的:探讨前方牵引矫治对早期前牙反软组织侧貌的影响。方法:选择前牙反伴有颜面形态异常(审美线明显异常)的儿童60人,男27人,女33人,年龄范围8～11岁,平均年龄9.3岁,将样本随机分为对照组和前方牵引治疗组,观察及治疗周期为11～13个月,平均12.1个月。治疗前后分别拍摄头颅侧位X线片,进行头影测量分析,统计学分析采用配对t检验。结果:治疗组矫治后的面突角、全面突角、下唇基角及鼻唇角明显减小,上下唇基角明显增大,上唇突点到审美线距离明显改善,与对照组间的差异均呈高度显著性,而上唇基角及下唇突点到审美线的距离治疗前后无明显变化。结论:前方牵引矫治后面部软组织侧貌明显改善,凹面型变为直面型或者接近正常面型,鼻、上唇、下唇以及颏部四者间的关系趋于协调,唇部曲线变得平缓、协调。     

Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissue change gradients after mandibular setback surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion

Objective:To evaluate whether mandibular setback surgery (MSS) for Class III patients would produce gradients of three-dimensional (3D) soft tissue changes in the vertical and transverse aspects.Materials and Methods:The samples consisted of 26 Class III patients treated with MSS using bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Lateral cephalograms and 3D facial scan images were taken before and 6 months after MSS, and changes in landmarks and variables were measured using a Rapidform 2006. Paired and independent t-tests were performed for statistical analysis.Results:Landmarks in the upper lip and mouth corner (cheilion, Ch) moved backward and downward (respectively, cupid bow point, 1.0 mm and 0.3 mm, P < .001 and P < .01; alar curvature-Ch midpoint, 0.6 mm and 0.3 mm, both P < .001; Ch, 3.4 mm and 0.8 mm, both P < .001). However, landmarks in stomion (Stm), lower lip, and chin moved backward (Stm, 1.6 mm; labrale inferius [Li], 6.9 mm; LLBP, 6.9 mm; B′, 6.7 mm; Pog′, 6.7 mm; Me′, 6.6 mm; P < .001, respectively). Width and height of upper and lower lip were not altered significantly except for a decrease of lower vermilion height (Stm-Li, 1.7 mm, P < .001). Chin height (B′-Me′) was decreased because of backward and upward movement of Me′ (3.1 mm, P < .001). Although upper lip projection angle and Stm-transverse projection angle became acute (Ch_Rt-Ls-Ch_Lt, 5.7°; Ch_Rt-Stm-Ch_Lt, 6.4°, both P < .001) because of the greater backward movement of Ch than Stm, lower lip projection angle and Stm-vertical projection angle became obtuse (Ch_Rt-Li-Ch_Lt, 10.8°; Ls-Stm-Li, 23.5°, both P < .001) because of the larger backward movement of Li than labrale superius (Ls).Conclusions:Three-dimensional soft tissue changes in Class III patients after MSS exhibited increased gradients from upper lip and lower lip to chin as well as from Stm to Ch.     

A comparative study of skeletal and dental stability between rigid and wire fixation for mandibular advancement

This study examined the skeletal and dental stability after mandibular advancement surgery with rigid or wire fixation for up to 2 years after the surgery. Subjects for this multisite, prospective, randomized, clinical trial were assigned to receive rigid (n = 64) or wire (n = 63) fixation. The rigid cases received three 2-mm bicortical position screws bilaterally and elastics; the wire fixation subjects received inferior border wires and 6 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with 24-gauge wires. Cephalometric films were obtained before surgery, and at 1 week, 8 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Skeletal and dental changes were analyzed using the Johnston's analysis. Before surgery both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. Mean anterior advancement of the mandibular symphasis was 5.5 mm (SD, 3.2) in the rigid group and 5.6 mm (SD, 3.0) in the wire group. Two years after surgery, mandibular symphasis was unchanged in the rigid group, whereas the wire group had 26% of sagittal relapse. Dental compensation occurred to maintain the corrected occlusion, with the mandibular incisor moving forward in the wire group and posteriorly in the rigid group. However, at 2 years after surgery, when most subjects were without braces, the overjet and molar discrepancy had relapsed similarly in both groups.     

Stability of the mandible after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion in 50 patients.

Fifty cases of skeletal Class III malocclusion were analyzed by the tracings of presurgical and postsurgical cephalograms to evaluate the stability of the mandible a year after surgery. In 33 patients, the curved oblique osteotomy in the ascending ramus was used; the correction was made in the mandibular body for 17 patients by either the rectangular osteotomy or the sliding osteotomy. Minimal relapse was observed in all three procedures, with the least amount occurring after mandibular body ostectomy or osteotomy. The results were considered to be due to careful determination of the correct time for surgery in each patient to avoid skeletal relapse resulting in continued mandibular growth, prompt osseous healing at the surgical sites by providing close and tight bony contact between the segments, elimination of the effect of the major muscles of mastication, minimum alteration in the position of the posterior segment and trimming of the margin of the anterior segment to form a proper gonial angle, and a stable occlusion with maximum intercuspation and an adequate overbite. In addition, preoperative orthodontic treatment and extraoral traction of the mandible by chin cups were considered effective means to stabilize the post-operative occlusion.     

Kinematic analysis of mandibular motion before and after orthognathic surgery for skeletal Class III malocclusion: A pilot study

Objectives: The aim of the study was to detect the changes in 3D mandibular motion after orthognathic surgery for skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Method: Using a 3D motion analyzer, free mandibular border movements were recorded in nine patients successfully treated for skeletal Class III malocclusion and in nine patients scheduled for orthognathic surgery. Data were compared using Mann–Whitney non-parametric U-test.

Results: The results showed no differences between the groups in the total amount of mouth opening, protrusion, and in lateral excursions, but the percentage of mandibular movement explained by condylar translation was significantly increased after surgery (20% vs. 23.6%). During opening, the post-surgery patients showed a more symmetrical mandibular interincisal point and condylar path than pre-surgery patients (p < 0.01).

Discussion: Patients treated with orthognathic surgery for skeletal Class III malocclusion recover a good and symmetric temporomandibular joint function.     

骨种植钉前牵引对骨性Ⅲ类错患者软硬组织侧貌的影响

目的研究采用骨种植钉前牵引对骨性Ⅲ类错患者软、硬组织侧貌的改变。方法选取18例需行前牵引矫治的生长发育期骨性Ⅲ类错患者,采用双侧上颌颧牙槽嵴植入骨种植钉配合面框式前牵引,平均治疗时间为9个月,力值为（3.5±0.1）N。治疗前后头影测量采用Legan&Burstone软组织分析法以及相关硬组织测量,分析比较患者治疗前后软、硬组织变化情况。结果所有患者Ⅲ类错均得到改善,鼻底趋于丰满,颏部顺时针旋转,侧貌由凹面型变为直面型,下唇突度减小,软组织上下面高比、鼻唇角、上唇突度及颏唇沟深度无明显变化。上前牙无明显变化,下前牙舌倾,上颌骨向前生长,A点前移,SNA、ANB增大;SNB减小,下颌骨顺时针旋转。结论骨种植钉前牵引可促进上颌生长,使面中份丰满,且对上颌前牙轴倾度无影响,从而纠正骨性Ⅲ类错。