Advancements in the treatment of agitation in Alzheimer’s disease

Introduction: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are associated with significant negative outcomes for patients and their caregivers. Agitation, one of the most distressing NPS, lacks well-established long-term interventions that are both effective and safe. While non-pharmacological interventions are the suggested first-line treatment, it isn’t effective in managing symptoms for every patient. In such cases, clinicians turn to the use of pharmacological interventions. Traditionally, these interventions consist of off-label use of antipsychotics, sedative/hypnotics, anxiolytics, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, memantine and antidepressants, where the efficacy doesn’t necessarily outweigh the associated risks.

Areas covered: Gains made in understanding the neurobiological mechanisms underlying agitation have fueled several recent clinical trials. A comprehensive literature search for published articles evaluating pharmacologic interventions for agitation in AD was done. A review of some of these clinical trials was completed: dextromethorphan/quinidine, scyllo-inositol, brexpiprazole, prazosin, cannabinoids, dronabinol and citalopram show promise in treating agitation.

Expert opinion: Neurobiological findings and enhanced trial designs have re-ignited the area of pharmacological treatment of NPS. Although further research is needed to fully determine the safety, tolerability and efficacy of these treatments, the mission to finding effective treatments for NPS such as agitation in patients with dementia is well underway.     

Future directions in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains the most common of the neurodegenerative disorders. In the elderly, it represents the most frequently occurring form of dementia, especially if considered alongside concomitant cerebrovascular disease. Current treatment involves the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, which have shown symptomatic benefits in the recognised domains of cognition, function and behaviour. While they may have intrinsic disease-modifying activity, this is yet to be proven, and strategies to alter the fundamental neuropathological changes in AD continue to be sought. Much of the evidence suggests that the accumulation of amyloid-β may play a pivotal role, therefore the bulk of current research is focused on possible intervention along the amyloid pathways. However, the abnormal phosphorylation of tau is also a reasonable target and as the molecular basis of AD is better delineated, more targeted treatment approaches are being proposed. This paper reports on the current data that is setting the future directions for research into AD.     

New concepts in the drug therapy of Alzheimer’s disease

There are currently four compounds approved for use in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). These drugs are all cholinesterase (ChE) inhibitors, which are thought to provide predominantly symptomatic benefits by increasing the level of acetylcholine (ACh) in the synapse. Although there are slight differences in the mechanisms of action of these compounds, it remains to be determined whether any one of them has a significant therapeutic advantage over the others. Several other drugs have also been investigated for their potential use as either symptomatic or disease-modifying agents in the treatment of AD, with mixed results. Current therapeutic research is focused on addressing the underlying pathology of AD, in the hope of arresting or reversing the course of the disease. This review will provide an overview of the ChE inhibitors and other drugs used for treating the symptoms of AD, summarise the results of recent therapeutic trials, discuss directions of future research and outline the current treatment recommendations for AD.     

Pharmacotherapeutic strategies in the treatment of severe Alzheimer’s disease

Introduction: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a slowly progressive neurodegenerative disease. Patients with severe AD often require assistance with daily functioning and have a substantially higher probability of admission to nursing homes compared to the general population.

Areas covered: Medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of severe AD include the cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs), donepezil (10 and 23 mg/day) and rivastigmine (transdermal patch, 13.3 mg/24 hours), and the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist memantine (immediate- and extended-release formulations). This article will review the efficacy, safety, and tolerability data of these agents in the treatment of severe AD. Issues related to combination therapy, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and treatment discontinuation are also discussed.

Expert opinion: AD therapeutics provide benefits on measures of cognition, functioning, behavior, and global status even in the severe stages of AD. Combination therapy with memantine and ChEIs may provide additive benefits compared with ChEI monotherapy. Decisions regarding discontinuation of these medications should be made on a case-by-case basis, with some evidence suggesting that discontinuation may worsen cognition and functional impairment. It is recommended that patients entering the terminal stages of AD discontinue all medications not necessary for comfort.     

Muscarinic M1 agonists in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

The treatment of Alzheimer’s disease attempts to correct cholinergic deficiency in the brain. In addition to the established, but restricted, efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, attempts are being made to develop agents which will stimulate muscarinic receptors directly. This approach is logical and was found efficacious in several animal models of the disease; however none of these agents succeeded in clinical studies. Several reasons might account for this failure, which are discussed, as well as the prospects for the future.     

Oestrogen and nerve growth factor – neuroprotection and repair in Alzheimer’s disease

The neurogenetics and neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are still largely unknown, even though recent work has clarified some genetic components in this common and devastating neurodegenerative disease. Most of the genetic mutations have been shown to be, at least in the early onset type of AD, related to the function of a large transmembrane protein, amyloid precursor protein (APP). This protein is cleaved into various smaller fragments that are either soluble or aggregating. It is thought that this processing of APP is inherently important for the initiation and progression of AD. Recent animal models have suggested that it is not the formation of β-amyloid plaques per se, but the altered processing of APP and the subsequent loss of soluble APP, that sets the stage for the massive neuronal cell loss which occurs in AD. We would like to propose a three-way relationship between oestrogen, APP and nerve growth factor (NGF) in the neural pathways of the brain which are involved in learning and memory – the limbic system. The degeneration of the cholinergic innervation from the basal forebrain to the hippocampal formation in the temporal lobe is thought to be one of the factors determining the progression of memory decay, both during normal ageing and AD. Oestrogen and NGF are among the neuroprotective agents that have shown some potential for the treatment of AD. Previous results of treatment with these two agents and their relationship to the amyloid proteins, will be discussed in this review.     

An update on the advancements in the treatment of agitation in Alzheimer’s disease

Introduction: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are associated with significant negative outcomes for patients and their caregivers. Agitation, one of the most distressing NPS, lacks safe and effective long term interventions. Nonpharmacological interventions are suggested as first-line treatment, but aren’t effective for every patient, resulting in pharmacological interventions for some patients, consisting of off-label use of antipsychotics, sedative/hypnotics, anxiolytics, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, and antidepressants; where efficacy doesn’t necessarily outweigh associated risks.

Areas covered: Gains in understanding neurobiological mechanisms underlying agitation have fueled several recent clinical trials. This article updates our review published in 2014. Comprehensive literature search for published articles from January 2014 to December 2016 evaluating pharmacologic interventions for agitation in AD was done. A review of several clinical trials was completed: dextromethorphan/quinidine, scyllo-inositol, brexpiprazole, prazosin, cannabinoids, citalopram, escitalopram, pimavanserin, ITI-007, ORM-12741 show promise in treating agitation.

Expert opinion: Neurobiological findings, innovative trials designs, statistical approaches, and preliminary paths for regulatory agency acceptance have re-ignited the area of pharmacological treatment of NPS. Though further research is needed to fully determine the safety, tolerability and efficacy of these treatments, the mission to find effective treatments for neuropsychiatric symptoms such as agitation in patients with dementia is well underway.     

Ongoing trials in Alzheimer’s disease

Researchers have sought to understand the underlying pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) ever since Dr A Alzheimer first described the condition in 1907. Unfortunately however, until recently, they have done so with limited success. This lack of clarity has deterred advancements in therapeutic drug research beyond all but the purely symptomatic treatment relief currently available. However, through spatio-temporal analysis of the two types of cerebral lesions that characterise the disorder (senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles) and the compilation of genetic data concerning familial AD, there now exists the foundation for a more comprehensive understanding of the disease. Although symptomatic cholinergic strategies have beneficial effects, their benefits are modest and current research has turned to the development of other promising strategies, including oestrogen replacement, anti-inflammatory agents, free radical scavengers, anti-oxidants and monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitors. Many of these strategies may have some merit, however further analysis and structured research are necessary before a definitive decision can be made about their efficacy and possible role in AD therapy. Strategies that are directed at halting the underlying biochemical changes in AD are nearing clinical testing and offer the promise for meaningful therapeutic outcomes.     

Evaluation of memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

Increasing evidence suggests that disturbances in glutamatergic activity play an important role in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Excessive glutamate-mediated activation of NMDA receptors, for example, may contribute to the neuronal death that characterises AD. On the other hand, physiological activation of the NMDA receptor appears necessary for normal cognitive function. Therefore, compounds that finely modulate NMDA receptor activity hold promise as treatments for AD. Memantine (Namenda^?, Axura^®, Ebixa^®; Forest Laboratories, Inc., Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, H. Lundbeck A/S) is a low-moderate affinity, uncompetitive NMDA-receptor antagonist that appears to block pathological, but not physiological, activation of the NMDA receptor. Consequently, therapeutic doses of the drug are well-tolerated and do not seem to interfere with the acquisition or processing of cognitive information. Memantine has been shown to improve symptoms and reduce the rate of clinical deterioration among patients with moderate-to-severe AD and was approved in the US for this indication in October 2003. This review provides a brief rationale for the development of memantine as a therapy for AD, as well as an overview of the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of this novel therapeutic agent.     

The role of inflammatory processes in Alzheimer’s disease

It has become increasingly clear that inflammatory processes play a significant role in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Neuroinflammation is characterized by the activation of astrocytes and microglia and the release of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Vascular inflammation, mediated largely by the products of endothelial activation, is accompanied by the production and the release of a host of inflammatory factors which contribute to vascular, immune, and neuronal dysfunction. The complex interaction of these processes is still only imperfectly understood, yet as the mechanisms continue to be elucidated, targets for intervention are revealed. Although many of the studies to date on therapeutic or preventative strategies for AD have been narrowly focused on single target therapies, there is accumulating evidence to suggest that the most successful treatment strategy will likely incorporate a sequential, multifactorial approach, addressing direct neuronal support, general cardiovascular health, and interruption of deleterious inflammatory pathways.     

Efficacy of memantine hydrochloride once-daily in Alzheimer’s disease

Introduction: In people with moderate-to-severe dementia in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) memantine provides some clinical benefits. It is commonly administered twice daily at a maximum dose of 20 mg. To improve medication adherence, convenience of use and to enable a higher daily dose, a 28 mg, extended-release formulation of memantine has been developed.

Areas covered: We review the results of a Phase III randomized and controlled trial of memantine extended release as an add-on treatment and compared the findings with a similarly designed previous trial evaluating the immediate release (IR) form.

Expert opinion: Memantine extended release produced minor benefits on cognitive ability, including verbal fluency, behavioral problems and global clinical assessment. There was no difference between the treatment groups on activities of daily living. The observed effects were not larger than those of the IR formulation tested in a similar setting. The lack of impact on activities of daily living suggests that the small improvements in cognition and behavior did not translate into clinically important changes. In conclusion, there is no convincing evidence that the novel once-daily formulation of memantine represents a significant progress in the clinical management of AD that would justify additional treatment costs.     

β-Amyloid therapies in Alzheimer’s disease

Neurones in the brain produce β-amyloid (Aβ) fragments from a larger precursor molecule termed the amyloid precursor protein (APP). When released from the cell, these protein fragments may accumulate in extracellular amyloid plaques and consequently hasten the onset and progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). β-Amyloid fragments are generated through the action of specific proteases within the cell. Two of these enzymes, β- and γ-secretase, are particularly important in the formation of Aβ as they cleave within the APP protein to give rise to the N-terminal and C-terminal ends of the Aβ fragment, respectively. Consequently, many researchers are investigating therapeutic approaches that inhibit either β- or γ-secretase activity, with the ultimate goal of limiting Aβ production. An alternative AD therapeutic approach that is being investigated is to employ anti-Aβ antibodies to dissolve plaques that have already formed. Both of these approaches focus on the possibility that accrual of Aβ leads to neuronal degeneration and cognitive impairment characterised by AD and test the hypothesis that limiting Aβ deposition in neuritic plaques may be an effective treatment for AD.     

Is memantine a breakthrough in the treatment of moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease?

Over stimulation of the NMDA receptor by glutamate has long been considered to have a role in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Memantine, a non-competitive antagonist of NMDA receptors, has recently been tested in moderate-to-severe AD. At 28 weeks, there was a small significant mean difference of 0.3 in favour of memantine, showing benefit in the Clinician’s Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-Plus) global score. The other primary efficacy variable was the Alzheimer’s disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory, modified for more severe dementia (ADCS-ADL-sev) and there was significantly less deterioration in the ADCSADL-sev score in the memantine group than in the placebo group (2.1 versus 3.4, respectively). As there are no drugs commonly used for their effectiveness in moderate-to-severe AD, any drug that causes a benefit, however small, as memantine has been shown to do in this trial, represents a breakthrough.     

Emerging chemical therapies targeting 5-hydroxytryptamine in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

Introduction: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a major neuropsychiatric disorder affecting more than 5 million Americans over age 65. By the year 2050, AD is expected to affect over 30 million. Characterized by neuronal cell death accompanied by the accumulation of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques, AD results in devastating clinical symptomatology with a lasting psychosocial and financial impact. Studies have shown that the current treatments for AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI’s) and NMDA receptor antagonists, have limited efficacy. The 5-HT-6 receptor antagonists Idalopirdine and Intepirdine have shown the most progress in current clinical trials and warrant consideration as emerging treatments for AD.

Areas covered: This review discusses 5-HT6 antagonists currently in clinical trials as potential treatments for AD symptomatology and how 5-HT6 physiology may play a positive role in alleviating AD symptom pathophysiology. A literature search using PubMed was conducted using the terms Idalopirdine, Intepirdine, 5-HT-6 antagonist, and AD as keywords. Clinicaltrials.gov and Alzforum were also used to obtain information on clinical trials.

Expert opinion: If current Phase-3 trials are positive, 5-HT6 antagonists such as Idalopirdine and Intepirdine may be considered as supplementary treatments to ChEI’s and NMDA receptor antagonists for the symptomatic treatment of AD.     

GSK-3 inhibitors and their potential in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) is a ubiquitously expressed kinase that has emerged as a promising drug target for several diseases, including various neurological conditions, Type 2 diabetes and cancer. For this reason, a number of drug candidates are being developed to achieve very different goals, any of which could have therapeutic value in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The importance of GSK-3 in so many processes, however, also suggests that issues of side effects will need to be addressed before GSK-3 inhibitors can be used in the clinic. This review discusses the role of GSK-3 in the development of AD, the various approaches that have been used to inhibit GSK-3 activity and the patents describing the use of GSK-3 inhibitors in the treatment of AD.     

Novel disease-modifying therapeutics for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer’s disease is the most common cause of dementia and is becoming a global health concern. Despite a well-established understanding of the molecular mechanism involved in its pathogenesis, and millions of dollars of investment in drug discovery and clinical trials, no single molecule has yet been approved for its treatment since the advent of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine. This review examines first the optimal use of currently approved agents and then explores in detail the current Phase II and III clinical trial landscape, while spending some time on the mechanistic details. Driven by the increasing knowledge gleaned from numerous Phase III failures and improvements in early detection and biomarkers, there is renewed enthusiasm that a cure is taking shape along the visible horizon.     

Chlorzoxazone exhibits neuroprotection against Alzheimer’s disease by attenuating neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in vitro and in vivo

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a complex and an age-related brain disease, is induced by the accumulation of amyloid beta (Aβ) and neuroinflammation. Chlorzoxazone (CZ) is a classical FDA-approved drug, and shows anti-inflammatory effects. However, up until now, its regulatory role in AD has not been investigated. Therefore, in this study we attempted to explore if CZ could be an effective therapeutic strategy for AD treatment. At first, the in vitro study was performed to mimic AD using Aβ. We found that Aβ caused p65 nuclear translocation in both primary microglial cells and astrocytes, which were, however, restrained by CZ treatments. Meanwhile, CZ incubation markedly decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β). Aβ deposition was also markedly reduced in glial cells treated with CZ. Importantly, we found that glial activation and its-related pro-inflammation induced by Aβ led to obvious neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation, which were effectively attenuated by CZ pre-treatment in the isolated primary cortical neurons. Then, the in vivo study was performed using APP/PS1 mice with AD. Behavior tests showed that CZ administration effectively improved cognitive deficits in AD mice. Neuron death in hippocampus of AD mice was also inhibited by CZ. Aβ accumulation in brain was markedly decreased in CZ-treated AD mice. We finally found that hippocampal glial activation in AD mice was obviously blocked by CZ supplementation, along with remarkable decreases in TNF-α, IL-1β and p65 nuclear translocation. Together, these findings above demonstrated that CZ could inhibit glial activation and inflammatory response, contributing to the suppression of neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation. Therefore, CZ may be an effective therapeutic strategy for AD treatment.