Conservative management in breech deliveries leads to similar results compared with cephalic deliveries.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference in neonatal mortality and morbidity between breech and cephalic presentations at term. METHODS: This was a retrospective matched cohort study in two centers between July 1998 and April 2000, including all breech deliveries between 37(+0) and 41(+6) weeks, except cases with multiple gestations and antepartum intrauterine deaths. All breech presentations were matched with two cephalic presentations. Onset of labor and route of delivery were recorded, and neonatal data were categorized into variables belonging to serious morbidity or moderate morbidity. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and nineteen deliveries were included. Three hundred and seventy-three babies were in breech position and 746 in cephalic position. The gestational age and birth weight of the babies in the breech group were lower than in the cephalic group (p < 0.001). Congenital abnormalities occurred more often in the breech group (p < 0.005). An elective cesarean section was performed in 23.3% of breech presentations versus 3.5% of cephalic presentations (p < 0.001). Emergency cesarean sections were done in 29.2% of breech presentations versus 8.8% of cephalic presentations (p < 0.001). Children born in breech presentation had lower Apgar scores after 1 minute (p < 0.0001), but 5-minute Apgar scores were the same in both groups (p = 0.22). Children born in breech presentation received significantly more resuscitation than children born in cephalic presentation (p < 0.001). In both groups no perinatal mortality occurred. No differences were observed in percentages of children with serious or moderate neonatal morbidity between the breech and cephalic lies. CONCLUSIONS: Although the numbers are small, this study shows that the conservative (vaginal) approach in selected fetuses in breech position can be safely pursued with neonatal results similar to fetuses in cephalic presentation.     

Comparison of the efficacy of low anterior resection with primary anastomosis and Hartmann's procedure in advanced primary or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

Objectives

To assess the safety of a decision protocol for type of delivery of breech presentations after 37 weeks of gestation. This protocol was based on a comparison of fetal head and maternal pelvic measurements.

Study design

Retrospective before-and-after study of 1133 breech infants born between 2000 and 2008 in a tertiary centre, analysing neonatal condition and percentage of vaginal deliveries by study period.

Results

Application of the protocol was accompanied by an increase in the percentage of vaginal deliveries of breech presentations from 24.0% in 2000–2004 to 38.5% in 2004–2008 (p < 0.001), without impairment of neonatal condition [composite mortality/morbidity variable: 3/567 (0.5%) vs 4/566 (0.7%), respectively; p > 0.99; neonatal arterial pH < 7.0: 8/521 (1.5%) vs 4/529 (0.8%), respectively; p = 0.23].

Conclusion

The use of a protocol based on objective criteria at the authors’ centre made it possible to increase the percentage of vaginal deliveries of breech presentations without impairing neonatal condition.     

Vaginal breech delivery at term and neonatal morbidity and mortality – a population-based cohort study in Sweden

Introduction: The routine to deliver almost all term breech cases by elective cesarean section (CS) has continued to be debated due to the risk of maternal and neonatal complications. The aims of the study were (1) to investigate if mode of delivery impacts on the risk of morbidity and mortality among term infants in breech presentation and (2) to compare the rates of severe neonatal complications and mortality in relation to presentation and mode of delivery.

Methods: This population-based cohort study used data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register. All women (and their newborn infants) with singleton pregnancies who gave birth at term to an infant in breech (n?=?27,357) or cephalic presentation (n?=?837,494) between 2001 and 2012 were included. Births with vacuum extraction and induced labors were excluded, as well as antepartum stillbirths, births with infants diagnosed with congenital malformations and multiple births.

Results: On one hand, the rates of neonatal complications and mortality were higher among infants born in vaginal breech compared to the vaginal cephalic group. On the other hand, after CS, the rates of all neonatal complications under study and neonatal mortality were lower among infants in breech presentation than in those in cephalic presentation. After adjustment for confounders, infants delivered in vaginal breech had 23.8 times higher odds AOR (ratio) for brachial plexus injury, 13.3 times higher odds ratio for Apgar score <7 at 5?min, 6.7 times higher odds of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), or convulsions and 7.6 higher odds ratio for perinatal mortality than those delivered by elective CS.

Conclusions: Despite a probable selection of women who before-hand were considered at low risk and, therefore, could be recommended vaginal breech delivery, infants delivered in vaginal breech faced substantially increased risks of severe neonatal complications compared with infants in breech presentations delivered by elective CS.

• Key message

• Vaginal breech delivery is associated with increased risk for severe neonatal complications.

     

The mode of delivery and neonatal outcome in breech presentations less than 32 weeks' of gestation

This study was undertaken to determine the effect of the delivery method on neonatal outcome in fetal breech presentation, and the following results were obtained. The rate of cesarean section for breech presentations was 70.7% (104/147). 1) There were 18 neonatal deaths (41.9%) in 43 vaginal breech deliveries compared to 8 (7.7%) in 104 cesarean breech deliveries. Neonatal deaths were significantly higher in vaginal breech deliveries than cesarean breech deliveries (p less than 0.001). 2) In breech presentations, intracranial hemorrhages were more common among vaginally born infants (44.2% vs. 25.0%; p less than 0.02), but the incidence of idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome (39.5% vs. 28.8%) did not differ significantly between vaginal and cesarean infants. 3) In singletons delivered vaginally, fetal distress was more common among breech presentations than vertex presentations (83.3% vs. 46.3%; p less than 0.02). 4) In vaginally delivered breech singletons, there was no neonatal death among infants with more than 4 one minute Apgar scores, and there was no significant difference between neonatal death and the no neonatal death groups with regard to gestational weeks and birth weight.     

Good perinatal outcome in selective vaginal breech delivery at term

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To compare perinatal outcome in groups of planned vaginal breech delivery, elective cesarean section with the fetus in breech presentation, and planned vaginal delivery with the fetus in cephalic presentation in a university hospital with a tradition of managing breech deliveries by the vaginal route. METHODS: A cohort study from a 7-year period 1995-2002, including 590 planned vaginal deliveries with a term (> 37 weeks) singleton fetus in breech presentation, 396 elective cesarean sections with a term singleton fetus in breech presentation, and 590 control women intending vaginal delivery with a singleton term fetus in cephalic presentation. RESULTS: The Apgar scores were lower in the group of planned vaginal breech delivery, but in other outcome measures there were no significant intergroup differences. The overall neonatal morbidity was small (1.2% vs. 0.5% vs. 0.3% in the respective study groups) if compared to a recently published randomized multicenter study. CONCLUSIONS: Selective vaginal breech deliveries may be safely undertaken in units having a tradition of vaginal breech deliveries.     

Pregnancy outcome and placental pathology in emergent cesarean deliveries for non-reassuring fetal heart rate in laboring versus non-laboring women

Objective: The objective of this study is to correlate between pregnancy outcome and placental pathology in emergent cesarean deliveries (ECD) for non-reassuring-fetal-heart-rate (NRFHR) performed in women in their active phase of labor versus those performed in non-laboring women.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study. Data were reviewed for all pregnancies necessitating ECD for NRFHR between January 2009 and December 2013. Maternal outcome, neonatal outcome, and placental pathology parameters were compared between ECDs performed during active phase of labor and those performed before the active phase of labor (non-labor group).

Results: During the study period, a total of 661 ECDs were performed due to NRFHR. Compared with the active labor group (n?=?335), the non-labor group (n?=?326) had more pre-eclampsia (p?=?0.033), small for gestational age (SGA) (p?=?0.016), and preterm labor (p?<?0.001). Worse composite neonatal outcome was observed in the non-labor group compared with the active labor group, p?<?0.001. By a stepwise logistic regression model, non-labor was independently associated with adverse neonatal outcome (1.88 OR CI; 1.19–2.96, p?=?0.007). Placental inflammatory lesions were more common in the active labor group (p=?0.043), and abnormal cord insertions were more common in the non-labor group (p?=?0.002) as well as placental weight?<10th% (p?=?0.019).

Conclusion: Higher rate of pregnancy complications, abnormal cord insertion, smaller placentas, and worse neonatal outcome are associated with ECD for NRFHR when performed before the phase of active labor.     

Head entrapment and neonatal outcome by mode of delivery in breech deliveries from 28 to 36 weeks of gestation

OBJECTIVES: We attempted to determine whether there are differences in the incidence of head entrapment and adverse neonatal outcome by mode of delivery in breech deliveries from 28 to 36 weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: Computerized data and charts of 321 viable consecutive singleton breech deliveries from 28 to 36 weeks' gestation were reviewed. Statistical methods used included χ², logistic regression, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Head entrapment occurred in 4 of 52 (7.7%) neonates delivered vaginally and 14 of 269 (5.2%) neonates delivered by cesarean section (p = 0.48). There were no statistically significant associations between head entrapment and adverse neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of head entrapment by mode of delivery for breech infants at 28 to 36 weeks' gestation, nor was there an association with adverse neonatal outcomes after entrapment. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1742-9.)     

Six hundred and ten breech versus 12,405 cephalic deliveries at term: is there any difference in the neonatal outcome?

OBJECTIVES: To compare neonatal morbidity of breech and cephalic deliveries at term. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study of 610 consecutive singleton breech presentations and 12,405 consecutive singleton cephalic presentations in term between 1992-1998. Five hundred and fourteen breech and 11,989 cephalic presentations were candidates for vaginal delivery, of which 407 (79%) breeches and 11,265 (94%) cephalic delivered vaginally. RESULTS: Neonatal intensive care admissions were significantly greater for breech than cephalic vaginal deliveries (2.7% versus 0.25%, P = 0.000), but newborn intensive care admission and mortality were equally distributed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A low caesarean rate is possible (21% beech and 6% cephalic). Neonatal morbidity was equal in the two populations. Admission to neonatal intensive care was significantly more frequent for caesarean section than for vaginal delivery in the cephalic group and equal in the breech group. This study justifies our obstetrical policy and the realisation of a trial in several centres similar in terms of perinatal management.     

The effect of gestational age on neonatal outcome in low-risk singleton term deliveries

Objective: To assess the association between gestational age at delivery and adverse neonatal outcome among term low-risk singleton neonates.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study design was used. The study group included all low-risk singleton term (37?+?0 to 41?+?6 weeks) newborns delivered in a single tertiary university-affiliated medical center over a 5-year period. Outcome of neonates delivered at 37?+?0 to 37?+?6 weeks of gestation (early term) and 41?+?0 to 41?+?6 weeks of gestation (late term) was compared to that of neonates delivered at 39?+?0–39?+?6 weeks of gestation (control).

Results: Overall, the outcome of 30?229 neonates was analyzed. The incidence of neonatal mortality was 1.0 per 1000 live-born neonates, with no significant difference between the various gestational age groups. Early term newborns were at higher risk for respiratory morbidity, hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, thrombocytopenia and unexplained jaundice, and had higher rates of prolonged hospital stay, NICU admission, sepsis workup and antibiotic treatment. On multivariate analysis, early term delivery was an independent predictor for composite respiratory morbidity (OR=2.4, 95% CI 1.6–3.8, p?p?p?p?Conclusion: Even in low-risk singleton deliveries, early term is associated with an increased risk of neonatal morbidity.     

Should fetal scalp blood sampling be performed in the case of meconium-stained amniotic fluid?

Objective: To investigate the effect of using fetal scalp blood sampling on the risk of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) with meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF).

Methods: Prospective data collection with regard to MSAF during labor for low-risk term cephalic singleton live birth from 2012 to 2014. Maternal, obstetric and neonatal data were compared according to the occurrence of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS group) or not (no RDS group).

Results: Of 515 newborns born through MSAF, 46 experienced RDS and from them 10 experienced meconium aspiration syndrome. No difference was observed according to maternal characteristic, abnormal fetal heart rate tracing pattern irrespective of its category and cesarean rate. Apgar at one?minute was lower in the group RDS (7.6 versus 8.5, p?<?0.05). The mean umbilical artery pH values did not differ between the two groups. Significant difference between newborns with and without RDS in terms of fetal scalp lactate sampling during the labor (71.1% versus 55.1%, p?<?0.05), and neonatal care unit (NCU) admissions (22.8% versus 10.8%, p?<?0.05). Secondary rather than primary meconium was associated with RDS when performing fetal scalp blood assessment (p?<?0.05). A significant correlation between RDS, fetal scalp blood assessment and MSAF diagnosed during the first stage of labor (after spontaneous rupture of membranes or at amniotomy) was found.

Conclusion: In case of MSAF, fetal scalp blood sampling did not reduce the risk of RDS.     

Influence of chorionicity in intra-partum management of twin deliveries

Objective: To analyze morbidity and mortality in twin pregnancies as a function of the type of delivery and chorionicity. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Analysis of the type of delivery, intertwin time interval, and perinatal variables of >1000 twin deliveries during a 10-year period. Main outcome measure: Influence of delivery type and chorionicity on perinatal outcome. Results: The rate of cesarean sections was 42.4%. No differences were found as a function of chorionicity or as a function of presentation of the second twin. Cesarean sections were performed after vaginal delivery of the first twin in 1.8% of cases, being more common if the second baby was in a non-cephalic presentation (6.9% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.05). The average twin-to-twin delivery time interval was longer in the cases where the second had a cephalic presentation (8.26?±?7.75?min vs. 6.81?±?5.97?min, p < 0.05). The umbilical artery pH was lower the longer the interval between the birth of the twins, both in monochorionic and dichorionic. Conclusions: According to the results, vaginal delivery is as safe as elective caesarean section in twin pregnancies where the first twin is in cephalic presentation and the intrapartum management should not vary due to chorionicity.     

Vaginal delivery or cesarean section at term breech delivery – chance or risk?

Aim: The aim of the study was to examine maternal age, parity, and estimated neonatal birth weight (BW) depending on the mode of a full-term breech presentation (BP) birth delivery and neonatal outcomes.

Material and methods: One hundred and forty-six singleton term breech presentation pregnancies were included in a retrospective study conducted at the Department of Gynecology/Obstetrics, Clinical Center of Serbia in Belgrade in 2013. Statistical analysis: Student's-t test, χ² likelihood ratio, and the Fisher's exact test. The level of statistical significance was set at p?<0.05.

Results: An ECS was the most common mode of delivery in (81.2%) nulliparous older than 35 years and most of the neonates (66.67%) with an estimated birth weight (BW) above 3500 grams were delivered by elective cesarean section (ECS). Perinatal asphyxia remained increased in the successful vaginal delivery (SVD) group (23.8%) compared with the urgent CS (UCS) group (13.3%) (p?=?0.035). Birth asphyxia was the most common in neonates were delivered by SVD (23.8%). There were no cases of perinatal deaths.

Conclusion: ECS remained the recommended mode of breech term delivery in nulliparous women older than 35 years, as well as in neonates with an estimated BW above 3500 grams.     

Perinatal outcomes of vacuum assisted versus cesarean deliveries for prolonged second stage of delivery at term*

Introduction: To compare perinatal outcomes of interventions for prolonged second stage of labor.

Materials and methods: Retrospective cohort study, in a single, university-affiliate, medical center (2007–2014). Eligibility: singleton gestations at term, diagnosed with prolonged second stage of labor and head station of S?+?1 and lower. We compared perinatal outcomes of cesarean deliveries (CD) with vacuum assisted deliveries (VAD).

Results: Of 62 102 deliveries, 3449 (5.6%) were eligible: 356 (10.3%) underwent CD and 3093 (89.7%) underwent VAD. The rate of five-minute Apgar scores <7 was higher in the CD group as well as rates of NICU admission, neonatal asphyxia and composite neonatal adverse outcome. After adjusting for different confounders, CD was associated with adverse neonatal composite outcome (aOR 1.57, 95% CI 1.21–2.05, p?=?0.001) and VAD with cephalhematoma (aOR 4.06, 95% CI 2.64–6.25, p?Conclusion: Our data suggests that in deliveries complicated by prolonged second stage, CD yield poorer neonatal outcome than VAD, with no apparent major difference in traumatic composite outcome.     

Neonatal outcomes in the setting of preterm premature rupture of membranes complicated by chorioamnionitis

Objective.?To examine the outcomes of neonates born to women with chorioamnionitis in the setting of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM).

Methods.?A retrospective cohort study was conducted of deliveries with diagnosis of PPROM between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation at an academic medical center. Patients who delivered with the diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis were compared with patients who delivered without this diagnosis. Neonatal outcomes including Apgar scores, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), sepsis, pneumonia, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were assessed. Dichotomous outcomes were compared using chi-square test. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to control for potential confounding variables.

Results.?Of the 1153 patients diagnosed with PPROM, 29.0% were diagnosed with chorioamnionitis prior to delivery. Neonates born to mothers with a diagnosis of chorioamnionitis in the setting of PPROM had higher incidences (34.8%) of low 5-min Apgar scores, RDS, NEC, ICH, and pneumonia compared with 22.9% in neonates born to mothers without chorioamnionitis (p?<?0.001).

Conclusions.?Patients who develop chorioamnionitis in the setting of PPROM are at higher risk for adverse neonatal outcomes compared with patients without chorioamnionitis in the setting of PPROM.     

A comparison of the neonatal morbidity of second twins to that of a low-risk population

OBJECTIVE: To assess the neonatal morbidity of second twins. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study in a department of perinatalogy. The neonatal morbidity of second twins was compared to that of a low-risk population: singletons in the cephalic presentation delivered vaginally. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-nine second twins and 18,061 vaginally delivered singletons in the cephalic presentation were studied. Of 452 (81%) second twins delivered vaginally, 310 (69%) were extracted using obstetrical maneuvers: internal version and breech extraction, breech extraction alone, or assisted breech delivery if the breech was already engaged. Before 33 weeks of gestation, there was no significant difference between the neonatal morbidity of the vaginally delivered second twins and the vaginally delivered singletons in the cephalic presentation. After 33 weeks of gestation, only the 1-min Apgar score <7 and the rate of intubation at birth were significantly higher in the second twins. Whatever the gestational age, there was no significant difference between the neonatal morbidity of the vaginally delivered second twins and that of the second twins born by cesarean section before labor. At comparable gestational ages, there was no significant difference between the death rate of the vaginally delivered second twins and that in the reference population. CONCLUSION: The neonatal morbidity of second twins was comparable to that of a low-risk population. Immediate management of the vaginally delivered second twins was, however, more intensive than that of vaginally delivered singletons in the cephalic presentation. It, therefore, requires appropriate equipment in a suitable obstetric-pediatric setting.     

Maternal and neonatal immediate effects of sequential delivery

Objective: To evaluate the immediate maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with sequential instrumental delivery (vaccum plus forceps) compared with the use of one instrument only (forceps or vaccum). Study design: A longitudinal observational study was carried out, including all instrumental deliveries performed in term singleton pregnancies, in vertex presentation, at station level 0 or +1. According to the type of the instruments, the deliveries were divided in three groups: the vaccum group, the forceps group and the sequential group. Immediate maternal and neonatal outcomes were evaluated. Results: A total of 275 instrumental deliveries were performed: 126 (45.5%) vaccum assisted deliveries, 62 (22.6%) forceps assisted deliveries and 87 (31.6%) sequential deliveries. Regarding maternal morbidity, there was a significant difference between the three groups (p < 0.001), with a higher rate of complications in the sequential group. The type of instrument was the only factor associated with significant maternal morbidity. The rate of immediate neonatal morbidity was 4.4% and there was no significant association with the instrument type or with other identifiable factors. Conclusion: Sequential delivery is associated with a higher maternal morbidity and it seems not to increase neonatal morbidity.     

Vaginal breech deliveries selected using computed tomographic pelvimetry may be associated with fewer adverse outcomes

Objective.?Vaginal breech (VB) delivery at term remains controversial. Our objective was to compare neonatal and maternal outcomes in VB deliveries selected using computed tomographic (CT) pelvimetry to those selected clinically.

Methods.?A retrospective cohort study of singleton, term, VB deliveries with adequate clinical pelvimetry and estimated fetal weight of 3,850?g was performed. Women in the CT group had adequate pelvimetry by CT measurements. Neonatal and maternal outcomes were recorded.

Results.?Of the VB deliveries, 58 women had adequate CT pelvimetry and 37 women were selected using clinical criteria alone. There were no perinatal deaths. Neonatal morbidity was significantly lower in VB deliveries selected using CT criteria at 0% versus 10.8% in the clinically selected group (p?=?0.02).

Conclusion.?VB deliveries selected using CT pelvimetry may be associated with fewer adverse neonatal outcomes than those selected using only clinical criteria. Therefore, it is inappropriate, without CT pelvimetry and strict selection criteria, to conclude that VB deliveries are unsafe. Our experience suggests that there may be a population in which VB delivery is a safe alternative if selected using a combination of specific clinical, sonographic, and CT criteria.     

The impact of route of delivery and presentation on twin neonatal and infant mortality: a population-based study in the USA, 1995–97

Objective: We examined whether the route of delivery for near-term (???34 weeks' gestation) twins, as candidates for vaginal delivery, affected neonatal and infant mortality rates. We further evaluated whether these mortality rates were modified by fetal presentation.

Methods: A population-based retrospective cohort study based on the matched multiple births data in the USA (1995–97) was performed. Analyses were restricted to non-malformed liveborn twins delivered at ??34 weeks' gestation. Twins with breech–breech and breech–vertex presentations were excluded, since they are not candidates for vaginal delivery. Neonatal mortality rates (death within the first 27 days) and post-neonatal mortality rates (death between 28 and 365 days) per 1000 twin live births, by route of delivery and fetal presentation, were derived. The associations between neonatal mortality, post-neonatal mortality and the route of delivery for vertex–breech versus vertex–vertex presentations were expressed based on relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) derived from logistic regression models based on the method of generalized estimating equations.

Results: Of the 177?622 twins analyzed, 87% (n?=?154?531) presented as vertex-vertex. Fifty-five per cent (n?=?97?692) of twins were both delivered vaginally, 41% (n?=?72?825) were both delivered by Cesarean section and, of the remaining 4% (n?=?7105), the first twin was delivered vaginally and the second by Cesarean section. Twins with vertex–breech presentations delivered by Cesarean–cesarean sections, as well as those with vertex–vertex presentations delivered vaginally, had the lowest neonatal mortality rate (1.6 per 1000 live births). The highest neonatal mortality rate in the vertex–breech pairs occurred with vaginal–Cesarean deliveries (2.7 per 1000 live births). Among twins with vertex–vertex presentations, twins delivered via the vaginal–Cesarean route experienced the highest neonatal mortality (3.8 per 1000 live births). The RR for neonatal mortality in this group was 2.24 (95% CI 1.35, 3.72) compared with twins both delivered vaginally.

Conclusion: Route of delivery and fetal presentation both confer an impact on twin infant mortality rates. Strategies to reduce discordant routes in complicated vaginal deliveries may lead to improved neonatal survival.     

The term breech presentation. A retrospective study with regard to the planned mode of delivery

BACKGROUND: To analyze retrospectively a large group of term breech and vertex deliveries, with regard to the influence of the mode of delivery on the frequency of fetal and maternal complications. METHODS: All singleton breech deliveries after completed 36 weeks of pregnancy, with a live fetus, delivered at Rogaland Central Hospital, from September 1 1996 to the May 10 2001 were included (n = 575). Correspondingly as a control group, 582 cases in vertex presentation were analyzed. RESULTS: Planned vaginal delivery (VD) for the fetus in breech presentation (n = 448) in comparison with elective caesarean section (CS) (n = 127) increased early neonatal morbidity (3.6% vs. 0%). The frequency of Apgar scores < 7 at 5 min also increased (4.2% vs. 0.8%), as well as umbilical artery pH < 7.0 (4.4% vs. 0%), and referrals to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (15.8% vs. 6.3%). Corresponding figures for planned VD of the fetus in vertex presentation were: 0.5% neonatal morbidity, 0.2% Apgar scores < 7 at 5 min, 8.1% admissions to NICU and 1.5% pH < 7.0 in umbilical arteries. Results comparing maternal morbidity in the different breech groups were inconclusive, but there were more maternal complications in the breech group planned for VD than in the corresponding vertex group (5.1% vs. 1.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Elective CS for breech presentation will significantly decrease the risks for the fetus in comparison with planned VD.     

Outcome of induced deliveries in growth-restricted fetuses: second thoughts about the vaginal option

Objective  To assess the outcome of induced deliveries with IUGR. Study design  We reviewed the computerized files of parturients who underwent inducted labor because of IUGR (<5th percentile). Outcome assessment included mode of delivery, indication for CS, NICU admissions and 5 min Apgar score. We compared these parameters to a control group of women whose deliveries were induced for other indications. Results  A total of 836 women with IUGR were included. Mean gestational age and birth weight were 38.2 weeks and 2,114 g, respectively. Overall, 43% of women delivered by non-elective C/S. The rate of non-elective CS for other indications was 12.3% (P < 0.0001) for all deliveries and 23.6% (P < 0.001) for induced deliveries. CS was performed due to non-reassuring FHR in 63% of IUGR fetuses, compared with 27% of all induced deliveries. There were 160 women with IUGR who preferred elective CS. Their newborns’ NICU admission and 5 min Apgar score <7 rates were lower than those for induced deliveries (NICU 43.1 and 29.4%, P < 0.05, 5 min Apgar <7 5 and 1%, P < 0.05). Conclusion  Growth-restricted neonates born after labor induction had higher rates of low Apgar scores and NICU admissions compared to growth restricted neonates delivered by elective C/S. Inductions of labor for IUGR were associated with higher rates of non-elective C/S due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate compared with inductions performed for other indications.