Recognizing breast ductal carcinoma in situ on fine‐needle aspiration: A diagnostic dilemma

In this study, we evaluated cytomorphologic features of different subgroups of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); we compared seven cytologic features between DCIS and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) aspirates to determine whether diagnosis of stromal invasion can be made based on fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) findings. There were 142 cases of DCIS and 1,978 cases of IDC enrolled in our study. FNA analysis revealed 80.3% sensitivity for DCIS and 94.7% sensitivity for IDC. High and intermediate grade DCIS exhibited marked nuclear abnormality (92.1% vs. 35.7%, 30.0%; P1 < 0.001, P2 < 0.001) and necrosis (69.7% vs. 0%, 10.0%; P1 < 0.001, P2 = 0.001) in a higher percentage of cases compared to low grade DCIS and intraductal/intracystic papillary carcinoma. The rates of background macrophages (71.3% for DCIS and 21.9% for IDC, P < 0.001) and extensive necrosis (54.0% for DCIS and 16.7% for IDC, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in DCIS compared to IDC. Lymphocytes were observed in conjunction with tumor cells more frequently in IDC (81.3%) compared to DCIS (36.8%, P < 0.001). Stromal fragments associated with tumor cells were only observed in invasive lesions (11.9% micro‐invasive DCIS and 52.1% IDC). Tubular structures were found exclusively in IDC (11.5%). Cytologic criteria for diagnosis of high and low grade DCIS are different. The suspicion of DCIS is raised when background macrophages and extensive necrosis are observed. Stromal invasion is suggested by FNA if lymphocytes are entwined around tumor cells or if stromal fragments associated with tumor cells or tubular structures are observed. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013;41:710–715. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Biologic markers in ductal carcinoma in situ and concurrent infiltrating carcinoma. A comparison of eight contemporary grading systems

The relevance of 8 contemporary classification and grading systems for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast was examined in 100 tumors by comparing DCIS grade with grade of the concurrent infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC). Besides tumor size and nodal status, the immunohistochemical parameters in both lesions were compared, including estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, c-erbB-2 protein, E-cadherin, vimentin, Ki-67 (MIB1), and p27. Nuclear grading of DCIS alone or in combination with architectural pattern and necrosis showed the best correlation with grade of the invasive component. There also was a positive correlation between every biologic marker expressed in DCIS and in the concurrent IDC, supporting a clonal relationship. Biologic markers varied between the different grades of DCIS. DCIS is heterogeneous, and the progression of DCIS to IDC may be from low-grade DCIS to low-grade IDC and high-grade DCIS to high-grade IDC. This concept is different from the conventional model held for intraepithelial neoplasia in the cervix, vulva, vagina, and skin, in which there is increasing severity of in situ atypia (dysplasia) before the development of stromal invasion.     

Matriptase and survivin expression associated with tumor progression and malignant potential in breast cancer of Chinese women: tissue microarray analysis of immunostaining scores with clinicopathological parameters

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the expression of matriptase and survivin in breast carcinoma and correlate with clinicopathological parameters. Methods: Immunohistochemical analysis of matriptase and survivin were performed in tissue microarray slides of 290 cases, including 11 normal breast tissue; 27 fibrocystic disease; 17 fibroadenoma; 6 atypical ductal hyperplasia; 39 ductal carcinoma in situ, low grade (DCIS, low grade); 39 ductal carcinoma in situ, high grade (DCIS, high grade); 27 invasive ductal carcinoma, grade I (IDC, grade I); 78 invasive ductal carcinoma, grade II (IDC, grade II); and 46 invasive ductal carcinoma, grade III (IDC, grade III). Results: The average immunostaining scores of matriptase were 44.1 in normal breast tissue, 52.7 in fibrocystic disease, 76.5 in fibroadenoma, 81.7 in atypical ductal hyperplasia, 133.7 in low-grade DCIS, and 155.8 in high-grade DCIS. Among 151 breast IDC cases, the average immunostaining scores of matriptase were 172.7 in grade I, 211.7 in grade II, and 221.2 in grade III. Additionally, the average immunostaining scores of surviving also correlate with tumor grades and stages. Conclusions: Higher expressions of matriptase and survivin correlate significantly with clinicopathological parameters in breast cancer and the malignant potential in premalignant lesions. In addition, higher survivin expression had poorer prognosis of breast IDC cases.     

Genetic pathways in the evolution of breast ductal carcinoma in situ

The patterns of allelic loss in 28 cases of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 25 cases of DCIS associated with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) were compared, in order to define whether pure DCIS represented an earlier stage than DCIS associated with IDC in the progression of breast carcinoma. To this aim, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on microdissected normal and neoplastic breast tissue, formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded. Fifteen microsatellite markers were examined, on chromosomes 1p, 3p, 7q, 11q, 12p, 13q, 16q and 17q, mostly focused on regions altered in breast cancer. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was greater in pure DCIS than in the DCIS component associated with IDC for 11 out of 15 markers. The difference was statistically significant for D13S260 and D17S800 (p=0.008 and p=0.01, respectively). DCIS associated with IDC showed a lesser degree of alteration than the synchronous IDC component for ten out of 15 markers. In contrast, LOH at D11S1816 and D16S318 was lower in pure DCIS than in DCIS associated with IDC and even greater in the IDC component. These results confirm that DCIS is a possible but not an obligate precursor of invasive breast cancer and suggest that pure DCIS and DCIS associated with IDC may be genetically distinct. The evolution from DCIS to IDC may follow multiple pathways and not a linear model.     

Genetic changes in intraductal breast cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridization.

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is considered a direct precursor of invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC). We combined tissue microdissection and comparative genomic hybridization to identify genetic changes in five DCIS lesions with no invasion and in two that were adjacent to IDC. Extensive genetic changes characterized pure DCIS cases with gains of 1q, 6q, 8q, and Xq as well as losses of 17p and chromosome 22 being most often involved. Except for the Xq gain, these changes are also common to IDC. Separate analysis of DCIS and IDC components in the same tumor revealed an almost identical pattern of genetic changes in one case, whereas substantial differences were found in another. We conclude that many of the common genetic changes in IDC may take place before development of invasive growth. However, a simple linear progression model may not always account for the DCIS-IDC transition.     

Relationship between the Extent of Intraductal Component and That of the Invasive Component in Ductal Carcinomas of the Breast

To clarify the relationship between the extent of the intraductal component and the invasive component in cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast, we divided 87 such cases into two groups, Group I in which the intraductal component extended for less than 10 mm (36 cases) and Group II in which the intraductal component extended for 10 mm or more (51 cases). On histological slides, there was an association between the extent of the intraductal component and the pattern of invasion. The majority (80.6%) of Group I IDC cases showed an invasive component composed of one invasive nodule, whereas 62.7% of Group II IDC cases showed an invasive component composed of two or more such nodules. On gross and microscopical examination, Group II IDC showed a significantly larger mean tumor size than Group I IDC (23.4 ± 8.9 mm vs. 18.3 ± 6.6 mm, P < 0.002 & 24.1 ± 14.1 mm vs. 17.1 ± 6.5 mm, P<0.002). A similar result was obtained by clinical examination (41.8+17.0 mm vs. 29.5 ± 11.6 mm, P 0.0001). These results suggest that Group II ductal carcinomas may frequently develop multiple stromal invasion, resulting suddenly in a sizeable breast mass perceived by the patient. Acta Pathol Jpn 39: 786-794, 1989.     

Paget's disease of the breast: clinical, imaging and pathologic findings: a review of 16 patients

Objectives:

To determine the clinical, imaging and pathological findings of Paget’s disease of the breast.

Materials and methods:

Approval by Institutional Review Board was granted and informed consent was waived. Retrospective review of the pathological diagnosis of 2,361 women with breast carcinoma between January 2004 and April 2010 revealed 27 patients with Paget’s disease of the breast. The clinical, mammographic and ultrasonographic images were retrospectively reviewed.

Results:

The prevalence of Paget’s disease of the breast was 1.14% of all breast carcinoma at this institution. Of the 27 patients with Paget’s disease, only 16 had imaging studies and this group constituted the basis of this study. All 16 patients were women, with ages ranging from 36–68 years (mean age 50.31 years). Eleven patients presented with clinical findings suggestive of Paget’s disease of the breast. Seven of these 11 patients also had associated palpable mass(es). Four patients presented with a palpable mass alone and one presented with bloody nipple discharge alone. Mammography was performed in all 16 patients and ultrasonography (US) in 15 patients. Of the 16 mammographic studies, two were negative. Of the 15 US studies, three were negative. Of these three negative US studies, two also had negative mammography and one had pleomorphic microcalcifications on mammogram. US was helpful in detecting multifocality in two patients. Mammography was 100% positive in patients who presented with palpable breast mass(es) and bloody nipple discharge, but 50% positive in patients who had clinically suggestive Paget’s disease alone. Almost all patients (15/16) had underlying breast malignancies. Seven patients had multifocality or multicentricity. Modified radical mastectomy was performed in 13 patients, simple mastectomy in two, and wide local excision in one patient. Pathological findings were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n = 3), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (n = 10), metaplastic carcinoma (n = 1), invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) (n = 1), and only Paget’s disease of the nipple without underlying breast carcinoma (n = 1).

Conclusion:

Patients with Paget’s disease of the breast have a high incidence of an underlying breast carcinoma. Most of the patients in this study presented late and were more likely to have positive mammograms. Mammography should be performed to identify the underlying breast carcinoma. Those who have only nipple areolar changes and no palpable mass have less positive mammography and less invasive carcinoma.     

Overexpression of HER-2/neu and its relationship with other prognostic factors change during the progression of in situ to invasive breast cancer.

Using permanent-section immunohistochemistry, we investigated the role of HER-2/neu in the development and progression of human breast cancer by measuring its overexpression in a series of hyperplastic (n = 30), dysplastic (n = 15), and malignant neoplastic (n = 708) lesions of ductal epithelium and by evaluating the relationships between overexpression and clinicopathologic features known to have prognostic significance in these lesions. The neoplasms included pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; n = 59) and infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC; n = 649). The latter were all node negative and stratified into IDC combined (n = 237) or not combined (n = 412) with a "significant amount" of DCIS (defined as DCIS greater than or equal to 10% of total tumor cellularity). Overexpression of HER-2/neu was not observed in any of the hyperplastic or dysplastic lesions. In contrast, it was present in 56% of pure DCIS and in 77% of the comedo subtype of this group. Only 15% of IDC overexpressed HER-2/neu. However, the rate of overexpression was significantly higher in the subset of IDC combined with DCIS compared with the subset of IDC not combined with DCIS (22% v 11%, respectively; P less than .0001). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that HER-2/neu plays a more important role in initiation than in progression of ductal carcinomas. They also suggest that overexpression decreases within individual tumors as they evolve from in situ to increasingly invasive lesions or, alternatively, that many invasive carcinomas arise de novo (ie, without progressing through a significant in situ stage) by mechanisms not involving HER-2/neu. In addition, overexpression of HER-2/neu was associated with several poor prognostic features (younger patient age, premenopause, negative estrogen receptor status, negative progesterone receptor status, and high nuclear grade) in the subset of IDC combined with DCIS. With one exception (negative estrogen receptor status) these associations were lost in IDC not combined with DCIS, also suggesting that the role of HER-2/neu changes during the progression of human breast cancer.     

Expression of maspin is up-regulated during the progression of mammary ductal carcinoma

AIMS: The tumour suppressor gene maspin is reported to inhibit the motility, invasiveness and metastasis of breast cancer cells. Maspin is expressed in normal mammary myoepithelial cells but is down-regulated during the progression of ductal carcinoma. However, we recently reported that maspin expression was frequently observed in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) with an aggressive phenotype, and it was a strong indicator of a poor prognosis. To our knowledge, to date, there has been no report investigating maspin expression in a large series of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS AND RESULTS: To clarify whether there is down-regulation during the progression of ductal carcinoma, we immunohistochemically investigated the expression of maspin in 145 DCIS, 92 invasive ductal carcinomas with a predominant intraductal component as well as 94 usual ductal hyperplasias and 27 atypical ductal hyperplasias. The expression of maspin in carcinoma cells was observed in 9.6% (14 of 145) of DCIS and 18.5% (17 of 92) of IDC with a predominant intraductal components. It significantly correlated with larger tumour size (P = 0.013; P = 0.042), higher histological grade (P = 0.015; P = 0.0003) and the presence of comedo-necrosis (P = 0.000005; P = 0.0074) in DCIS and IDC with a predominant intraductal components, respectively. In epithelial cells, the expression of maspin was observed in only one case of usual ductal hyperplasia, and all cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia were negative. CONCLUSIONS: These results and our previous investigation in which 27.4% of IDC were positive for maspin suggest that the expression of maspin in epithelial cells could be up-regulated during the progression of ductal carcinoma, and that it could be correlated with the acquisition of an aggressive phenotype.     

Myoepithelial cells and basal lamina in poorly differentiated in situ duct carcinoma of the breast

 A retrospective study was made of 38 selected brest tumours with a poorly differentiated in situ duct component. These were classified on haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; 10 cases), DCIS with invasion (17 cases) and DCIS with features suggestive of for stromal invasion (11 cases). The last were these lesions composed of neoplastic ducts with irregular outlines and a myoepithelial layer that was not clearly evident or large neoplastic ducts growing close together or surrounded by inflammatory desmoplastic stroma. Cases of DCIS involving areas of sclerosing adenosis were included in this category. Consecutive sections obtained from each case were studied with a panel of antibodies against myoepithelial cells (alpha smooth muscle actin and calponin) and basal lamina (BL) components (laminin and type IV collagen). It was found that in situ lesions showed well-formed basal lamina and/or an evident myoepithelial layer. These features were lacking in the invasive areas. Nine of the 11 cases with suggestive features of stromal invasion were reclassified as invasive duct carcinoma (5 cases)and DCIS (4 cases), according to the absence or presence of a continuous myoepithelial layer and/or basal lamina. In 2 such cases immunohistochemistry yielded equivocal results and the label ”suggestive of invasion” was therefore pertinent. Immunohistochemistry facilitates the diagnosis of breast DCIS; myoepithelial and basal lamina markers are useful in differentiating microinvasive from in situ ductal carcinomas of the breast. Received: 29 July 1998 / Accepted: 11 November 1998     

Relationship between the extent of intraductal component and that of the invasive component in ductal carcinomas of the breast

To clarify the relationship between the extent of the intraductal component and the invasive component in cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast, we divided 87 such cases into two groups, Group I in which the intraductal component extended for less than 10 mm (36 cases) and Group II in which the intraductal component extended for 10 mm or more (51 cases). On histological slides, there was an association between the extent of the intraductal component and the pattern of invasion. The majority (80.6%) of Group I IDC cases showed an invasive component composed of one invasive nodule, whereas 62.7% of Group II IDC cases showed an invasive component composed of two or more such nodules. On gross and microscopical examination, Group II IDC showed a significantly larger mean tumor size than Group I IDC (23.4 +/- 8.9 mm vs. 18.3 +/- 6.6 mm, P less than 0.002 & 24.1 +/- 14.1 mm vs. 17.1 +/- 6.5 mm, P less than 0.002). A similar result was obtained by clinical examination (41.8 +/- 17.0 mm vs. 29.5 +/- 11.6 mm, P less than 0.0001). These results suggest that Group II ductal carcinomas may frequently develop multiple stromal invasion, resulting suddenly in a sizeable breast mass perceived by the patient.     

New prognostic histological parameter of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: clinicopathological significance of fibrotic focus

Immunohistochemistry, DNA ploidy analysis and molecular genetics have made it possible to predict the outcome of breast cancer more precisely than routine histological examination alone. However, in routine practice, it is difficult to incorporate these methodologies in all cases. If certain histological parameters can accurately predict the outcome of patients with breast cancer, they would be more practical for routine use. We showed that the presence of fibrotic focus (FF) in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) is closely associated with c-erbB-2 or p53 protein expression, high proliferative activity, and high angiogenesis of the tumors. Furthermore, multivariate analyses with well-known prognostic parameters for IDC demonstrated that the presence of FF is the most useful independent parameter to predict IDC patient outcome. In addition, our data suggested that the interaction between tumor cells and stromal fibroblasts may play an important role in the formation of FF in IDC based on growth factor and growth factor receptor protein expression in the tumor cells and fibroblasts forming FF. Based on the results of our clinicopathological studies, we propose a new prognostic classification scheme for the prediction of IDC patient outcome, which consists of FF, nuclear atypia, and fat invasion. This classification has superior predicting power to existing prognostic classifications.     

Notch1 single nucleotide polymorphism rs3124591 is associated with the risk of development of invasive ductal breast carcinoma in a Chinese population

Accumulated evidence has revealed the presence of Notch receptor polymorphisms in non-tumorous diseases; however, few studies have investigated the association of Notch polymorphisms with breast cancer risk. A total of 100 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and 50 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients and 100 usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH) controls were genotyped for the following Notch receptor single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry: Notch1, rs3124591; Notch2, rs11249433; Notch3, rs3815188, and rs1043994; and Notch4, rs367398, and rs520692. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine the effect of Notch polymorphisms on corresponding Notch protein expression in successfully genotyped patients. The frequency of rs3124591 TC genotype was significantly higher in IDC (24.7%, 20/81) and DCIS (30%, 12/40) patients than in UDH controls (8%, 8/97) (P = 0.002 and P = 0.011, respectively). However, the distribution of other SNP genotypes was not significantly different between IDC and DCIS patients and UDH controls. The frequency of TC genotype was significantly higher in poorly differentiated tumors than in well-differentiated and moderately differentiated tumors (P = 0.022). Importantly, a positive correlation between the rs3124591 TC genotype and high Notch1 protein expression was observed in DCIS patients (P = 0.043) but not in IDC patients. This is the first study to suggest an increased risk of IDC and DCIS of the breast for the Notch1 rs3124591 variant. Furthermore, given the inconsistent associations between the rs3124591 variant and Notch1 expression in IDC and DCIS, this variant may affect breast cancer risk through mechanisms in the latter stage other than alterations in Notch1 protein expression.     

Mean nuclear area and metallothionein expression in ductal breast tumors: correlation with estrogen receptor status.

Breast carcinoma is the most common malignancy in women. Estrogen is an important growth factor for breast tumor that plays an important role in regulating the proliferation and differentiation of normal and malignant mammary epithelial cells. Nuclear morphometry and metallothioneins (MTs) are indicators of proliferation that have been used as predictors of prognosis in many tumors. The present study aimed to study mean nuclear area (MNA) and MT; estrogen receptor (ER) expression in fibroadenoma (FA), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast. Also MNA and MT expression will be correlated with histologic grade and ER status in breast carcinoma. Breast tissues from 18 patients with FA, 10 patients with DCIS, and 40 patients with IDC were used in this study. MNA and MT expression; as proliferation markers; were investigated and correlated with ER status. All cases of FA, 7 out of 10 cases (70%) of DCIS and 23 out of 40 cases (57.5%) of IDC were positive for ER. MNA of cancer cells was significantly larger than that of normal and benign breast tissue. A significant direct correlation was found between MNA and histologic grades. MNA of ER-negative carcinomas was significantly larger than that of ER-positive tumors. In normal and benign breast tissue, myoepithelial cells consistently expressed the MT protein. Four out of 10 DCIS cases (40%) and 24 out of 40 cases of IDC cases (60%) were positively stained for MT. MT positivity was directly correlated with histologic grade of IDC. There was a highly significant inverse correlation between MT and ER overexpression. From this study, it is concluded that in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast, the large MNA and MT overexpression are correlated with histologic grades and ER negativity. Therefore, large MNA and MT overexpression may be possible important indicators for more aggressive and less differentiated breast carcinoma.     

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the breast coexisting with infiltrating ductal carcinoma

A recently described and rare variant of breast carcinoma, mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (MCA), is reported in a 65-year-old post-menopausal woman. She presented with a gradually enlarged breast tumor. A well-circumscribed tumor measuring about 3 cm in diameter was noted in the mammographic and ultrasonographic examinations. The mammographic and ultrasonographic findings were indistinguishable from more common mucinous carcinoma (colloid carcinoma) of the breast. The gross appearance of the tumor was well-defined and cystic, consisting of abundant transparent to bloody mucin, as well as whitish solid parts. Microscopically, the tumor was characterized by abundant extracellular and intracellular mucin. It looked like a mucinous cystic neoplasm of the ovary and pancreas. Particularly, few microscopic foci of ordinary intermediate-grade infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were observed around the main lesion in this case. A transition from ordinary DCIS to MCA in situ was found. It might indicate MCA derives from a metaplasia process of ordinary DCIS. MCA can be easily differentiated from mucinous carcinoma by quite different histologic and immunohistochemical findings. According to the previously reported and present cases, MCA of the breast more commonly affects elderly women and has a relatively favorable prognosis.     

HER2 status in pure ductal carcinoma in situ and in the intraductal and invasive components of invasive ductal carcinoma determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry

AIM: To determine the HER2 status of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast. The increased prevalence of HER2 amplification and overexpression in DCIS is considered to be maintained in the intraductal component of IDC; however, HER2 amplification and overexpression are detected much less in IDC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed to detect HER2 in 270 IDCs with an intraductal component and in 50 pure DCIS samples; IHC was also performed in 116 metastatic nodes. HER2 was found to be amplified in 77 cases (28.5%) and overexpressed in 79 (29.3%) of the 270 IDCs. HER2 amplification was similar between intraductal and invasive components of the same tumour. The concordance for HER2 status between invasive and intraductal components of individual tumours was 98.5% and 99.3% by FISH and IHC, respectively. HER2 was amplified in 25 (50%) of the 50 pure DCIS samples. HER2 overexpression in metastatic nodes resembled the HER2 status in the primary tumour for 108 (93.1%) of 116 cases (kappa =0.831). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that the intraductal component of IDC may differ biologically when compared with pure DCIS. HER2 appears to lack a critical role in the progression from DCIS to IDC and HER2 status is maintained in metastatic lesions.     

Lobular carcinoma in situ and infiltrating ductal carcinoma: frequent presence of DCIS as a precursor lesion

Infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) occurs frequently in patients with lobular carcinoma in-situ (LCIS). LCIS is not thought to be the direct precursor of the invasive component. The authors analyzed 15 cases of coexisting LCIS and IDC and found ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 12. The DCIS and IDC were of similar grade and located in the same area. Selected cases stained with E-cadherin demonstrated a different immunophenotype for the lobular and ductal lesions. These results support the notion that DCIS is the direct precursor of IDC occurring in patients with LCIS.     

Stromal CD10 expression and relationship to the E‐cadherin/β‐catenin complex in breast carcinoma

Kim H‐S, Kim G Y, Kim Y W, Park Y‐K, Song J‐Y & Lim S‐J
(2010) Histopathology 56, 708–719
Stromal CD10 expression and relationship to the E‐cadherin/β‐catenin complex in breast carcinoma Aims: Previous investigations have indicated that stromal CD10 expression, and altered levels of both E‐cadherin and β‐catenin, are associated with the biological aggressiveness of human carcinoma. The aim was to evaluate stromal CD10 expression and the association of stromal CD10 with E‐cadherin and β‐catenin in breast carcinoma. Methods and results: The expression of CD10, E‐cadherin and β‐catenin was immunohistochemically analysed in tissue microarrays containing 104 cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and 10 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Stromal CD10 was detected in 49.5% (50/101) of the IDC. No immunoreactivity was identified in the stromal cells of normal breast, DCIS or intraductal components of IDC. Accumulation of the cytoplasmic β‐catenin was found in 87.0% (87/100) of the IDC. Stromal CD10 expression in IDC was significantly correlated with tumour size (P = 0.027), stage (P < 0.001) and histological grade (P = 0.006), the presence of nodal (P = 0.048) and distant (P = 0.015) metastases, oestrogen receptor‐negative status (P = 0.016), cytoplasmic β‐catenin accumulation (P = 0.031) and lower overall survival rate (P = 0.041). Conclusions: Stromal CD10 expression in IDC may constitute an important prognostic marker. Stromal CD10 expression with associated aggressive features might be related to aberrant β‐catenin expression.     

Cyclin D1 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ, atypical ductal hyperplasia and usual ductal hyperplasia: an immunohistochemical study

The cell cycle regulatory gene, Cyclin D1, plays a critical role in the growth and progression of several types of human cancer, including breast cancer. Immunohistochemical study of Cyclin D1 expression has been extensively reported in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). In contrast, there have been few reports concerning Cyclin D1 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and their positive rates are variable. The differences in the reported frequency may be largely due to the differences in antibodies used, immunohistochemical methods and the positive cut-off point. However, we speculated that the strictness of diagnosis of DCIS might be somewhat responsible for these differences in frequency. Therefore, we selected cases of DCIS by carefully eliminating cases of predominantly intraductal carcinoma (PIC). Moreover, to clarify whether Cyclin D1 expression is involved in multistep carcinogenesis or the progression of human breast cancer, we immunohistochemically investigated Cyclin D1 expression in 57 DCIS, 10 atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), 70 usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), 44 PIC and 92 IDC. Cyclin D1 expression was detected in 41 DCIS cases (72%), 22 PIC cases (50%) and 40 IDC cases (43%). No expression of Cyclin D1 was observed in either ADH or UDH. There were no significant correlations between Cyclin D1 expression and histological grade or estrogen receptor expression in DCIS. These results suggest that Cyclin D1 expression may play an important role in the early stages of carcinogenesis, and that immunohistochemical detection of Cyclin D1 expression may be helpful in differentiating low-grade DCIS from ADH.