Anatomical conditions of the posterior pelvic ring regarding bisegmental transverse sacroiliac screw fixation: a 3D morphometric study of 125 pelvic CT datasets

Introduction

Sacroiliac (SI) screws are used for osteosynthesis in unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries. In the cases of “sacral dysplasia”, in which the elevated upper sacrum does not allow a secure SI screw insertion into the S1 level, the S2 segment must be used to achieve stable fixation. The bone quality of the S2 segment is thinner compared to that of the S1 vertebra and may cause biomechanical weakness. An additional SI screw insertion into the S3 level may improve stability. With respect to the anatomical conditions of the posterior pelvic ring, there have been no anatomical investigations to date regarding SI screw placement into the third sacral segment.

Materials and methods

CT raw datasets from 125 patients (ø59 years, ø172 cm, ø76 kg) were post-processed using Amira 5.2 software to generate 3D pelvic models. A program code implemented in C++ computed a transverse bone corridor for the first, second and third sacral segments for a typical SI screw diameter of 7.3 mm. Volume, sagittal cross-section, iliac entrance area and length of the determined screw corridors were measured. A confidence interval of 95 % was assumed (p < 0.05).

Results

The fully automatic computation revealed a possible transverse insertion for one 7.3-mm screw in the third sacral segment in 30 cases (24 %). The rate (60 %) of feasible S3 screw placements in the cases of sacral dysplasia (n = 25) is significantly higher compared to that (15 %) of “normal” sacra (n = 100). With regard to the existence of transverse iliosacroiliac corridors as a function of sacral position in between the adjacent iliac bone bilaterally, a new classification of three different shape conditions can be made: caudad, intermediate minor, intermediate major, and cephalad sacrum. Gender, age, body height and body weight had no statistically significant influence on either possible screw insertion or on the calculated data of the corridors (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

SI screw insertion into the third sacral level deserves discussion in the cases of sacral dysplasia. Biomechanical and practical utility must be verified.     

How bilateral iliolumbar fusion increases the stability of horizontal osteosynthesis in unstable pelvic ring injuries?

Objective

In type C pelvic ring injuries, the operative stabilization of the posterior ring is absolutely indicated. There exist four different types of operative methods: iliosacral screw fixation, transsacral plate synthesis, ventral plate fixation (primarily for sacroiliac luxations), and local plate synthesis performed on the dorsal cortex of the sacrum. In our current article, we analyzed the stability of fixation methods used together with bilateral iliolumbar techniques.

Methods

We analyzed a finite element pelvic model attached to lumbar 4–5 vertebrae. By imitating a standing position on two feet, we measured the differences in tension and displacement in T1 and T2 thoracic vertebrae fractures with and without iliolumbar fusion in cases of iliosacral screw fixation, transsacral plate synthesis and KFI-H (small fragment-H) plate synthesis.

Results

The osteosynthesises reinforced via Galveston technique were rather stable; the amount of displacement measured in the fracture gap was significantly less than in the cases without iliolumbar fusion. The tension in the implants were below the allowed values, therefore they were capable of withstanding the imposed loads without permanent deformation.

Conclusions

In unilateral pelvis injuries, if a non-weight bearing status cannot be achieved on the injured side, unilateral iliolumbar fusion reinforcement is justified, since the contralateral lower limb must also be non-weight bearing due to the pelvis injury itself. In the case of the most unstable sacrum fracture—“jumper’s fracture”, bilateral iliolumbar fusion is necessary, in which case the patient will be able to bear weight during the early postoperative period.     

The result of S1 double screw fixation in patients not suited for L4 and/or L5 pedicle screw insertion

Background

Variable methods are available for sacropelvic fixation. The usefulness of S1 double screw fixation for deformity surgery is established, but its effectiveness in cases where the L4 and/or L5 pedicle screw is not appropriate has not been reported.

Methods

We reviewed medical records to identify long-segment, lumbar spine fixation involving S1 double screws. Nine such patients were treated between November 2006 and November 2012 at our center: all patients had infectious spondylitis involving L4 and/or L5. Two patients were excluded due to a limited follow-up period (< 6 months). The remaining seven patients were enrolled. We used dynamic X-rays or three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) to assess any change in the lumbar alignment angle and to evaluate bony fusion with the graft material.

Results

The mean observation period of the seven patients was 16.9 months (range: 6–25). The mean age was 63.43 years (range: 55–73). Four patients were women. The average number of fusion levels was 3.5?±?1.1. The ideal positioning and maintenance of the S1 double screws and bony fusion with the graft materials were confirmed using serial imaging. Lordosis in the lumbar region was immediately restored after surgery (27.0 °?±?10.4 to 35.1 °?±?10.7), and maintained with slight decrease (31.6 °?±?8.8) throughout the follow-up period.

Conclusions

S1 double screws provided stability when L4 and/or L5 pedicle screw fixation was not possible. Our results suggest that S1 double screws are a viable option for sacropelvic fixation in selected patients.     

Trans-iliosacral plating for vertically unstable fractures of sacral spine associated with spinopelvic dissociation: A cadaveric study

Background:

The treatment algorithm for sacral fracture associated with vertical shear pelvic fracture has not emerged. Our aim was to study a new approach of fixation for comminuted and vertically unstable fracture pattern with spinopelvic dissociation to overcome inconsistent outcome and avoid complications associated with fixations. We propose fixation with well-contoured thick reconstruction plate spreading across sacrum from one iliac bone to another with fixation points in iliac wing, sacral ala and sacral pedicle on either side. Present biomechanical study tests the four fixation pattern to compare their stiffness to vertical compressive forces.

Materials and Methods:

Dissection was performed on human cadavers through posterior midline paraspinal approach elevating erector spinae from insertion with two flaps. Feasibility of surgical exposure and placement of contoured plate for fixation was evaluated. Ten age and sex matched computed tomography scans of pelvis with both hips were obtained. Reconstructions were performed with advantage windows 4.2 (GE Light Speed QX/I, General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Using the annotation tools, direct digital CT measurement (0.6 mm increments) of three linear parameters was carried out. Readings were recorded at S2 sacral level. Pelvic CT scans were extensively studied for entry point, trajectory and estimated length for screw placement in S2 pedicle, sacral ala and iliac wing. Readings were recorded for desired angulation of screw in iliac wing ala of sacrum and sacral pedicle with respect to midline. The readings were analyzed by the values of mean and standard deviation. Biomechanical efficacy of fixation methods was studied separately on synthetic bone. Four fixation patterns given below were tested to compare their stiffness to vertical compressive forces: 1) Single S1 iliosacral screw (7.5 mm cancellous screw), 2) Two S1 and S2 iliosacral screws, 3) Isolated trans-iliosacral plate, 4) Trans-iliosacral plate + single S1 iliosacral screw.

Statistical Analysis:

Mean of desired angulation for inserting screws and percentage of displacement on biomechanical testing was evaluated.

Results:

Mean angulations for inserting sacral pedicel were 12.3° (SD 2.7°) convergent to midline and divergent of 14° (SD 2.3°) for sacral ala screw and 23° (SD 4.9°) for iliac wing screw. All screws needed to be inserted at an angle of 90° to sacral dorsum to avoid violation of root canals. Cross headed displacement across fracture site was measured and plotted against the applied vertical shear load of 300 N in five cycles each for all the four configurations. Also, the force required for cross headed displacement of 2.5 mm and 5 mm was recorded for all configurations. Transmitted load across both ischial tuberosities was measured to resolve unequal distribution of forces. Taking one screw construct (configuration 1) as standard base reference, trans-iliosacral plate construct (configuration 3) showed equal rigidity to standard reference. Two screw construct (configuration 2) was 12% stronger and trans-iliosacral plate (configuration 4) with screw was 9% stronger at 2.5 mm displacing on 300 N force, while it showed 30% and 6%, respectively, at 5 mm cross-headed displacement.

Conclusions:

Trans-iliosacral plating is feasible anatomically, biomechanically and radiologically for sacral fractures associated with vertical shear pelvic fractures. Low profile of plate reduces the risk of hardware prominence and decreases the need for implant removal. Also, the fixation pattern of plate allows to spare mobile lumbosacral junction which is an important segment for spinal mobility. Biomechanical studies revealed that rigidity offered by plate for cross headed displacement across fracture site is equal to sacroiliac screws and further rigidity of construct can be increased with addition of one more screw. There is need for precountered thicker plate in future.     

Reinforcement of lumbosacral instrumentation using S1–pedicle screws combined with S2–alar screws

Objective

Increasing construct stability of lumbosacral instrumentations using S2–ala screws as an alternate to iliac screws.

Indications

Revision surgery after failed lumbosacral fusion; long instrumentations to the sacrum; L5–S1 fusion without anterior support.

Contraindications

Lack of sacral bone stock.

Surgical technique

Midline approach. The entry point for S2–ala screws is caudal to the posterior S1 foramen and close to the lateral sacral crest. Screw tract preparation for S2–ala screws necessitates 30–45° angulation in the axial plane. Biplanar fluoroscopy with inlet and outlet views ensure screw accuracy. With S2–ala screws, bicortical fixation is the goal.

Postoperative management

Patients are mobilized under the surveillance of physiotherapists on day 1 and released from the hospital after 10 days. Clinical and radiographic controls are performed at 6, 12 and 24 months.

Results

Retrospective review of 80 patients undergoing S2–ala screw fixation. Main diagnosis was degenerative lumbar instability, adult scoliosis, high-grade listhesis, and nonidiopathic scoliosis. In 66% of patients, the instrumentation using S2–ala screws was part of a major lumbosacral revision surgery. Follow-up averaged 26 months. There were no deaths or major neurovascular complications. First time fusion rate at L5–S1 was greater than 90%. Eight patients (10%) experienced a complication which could be related to the S2–ala screws. Out of 160 S2-ala screws, 16 screws were judged to cause focal irritation and were removed, indicating a survival rate of 90% for the S2–ala screw.     

An anatomic study on the placement of the second sacral screw and its clinical applications

Background

The fixation of lumbosacral and sacral pelvis can be performed on the ilium and the Second Sacrum Vertebrae (S2). Although several studies on the anatomical and biomechanical features of S2 screw fixation have been published, little clinical application has been reported, especially combination of anatomical investigation and clinical study. This study was performed to design and optimize the method of pedicle screw placement for S2.

Materials and methods

Fifteen adult dry sacrum specimens were prepared and truncated from the S1–S2 and S2–S3 vertebral fusion remnants, and the morphology of the S2 vertebral body was observed from this section. The intersection of the horizontal line through the lowest point of the inferior edge of the first posterior sacral foramen and the lateral sacral crest was the entry point (Point X). The screws were inserted anterolaterally or anteromedially at Point X in 10 cadavers, with all of the screws penetrating the sacrum. Finally, the S2 sacral screw fixation technique was applied to a total of 13 patients with lumbosacral lesions, and the clinical outcome was evaluated at a minimum follow-up of 1 year.

Results

Two S2 sacral screw placement methods were developed, i.e., the anterolateral and anteromedial insertions. Seven patients had complete preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up data. In all cases, the bilateral S2 screws were placed in good position and the fixation was firm. There was no surgical wound infection or internal fixation loosening. All the patients achieved partial bone graft healing, which was verified by computed tomography.

Conclusions

The intersection of the horizontal line through the lowest point of the inferior edge of the first posterior sacral foramen and the lateral sacral crest can be used as the entry point for S2 sacral screw fixation. The S2 pedicle screw fixation shows good clinical effectiveness and safety for stable reconstruction of lumbosacral lesions.     

Percutaneous iliosacral screwing in pelvic ring injury using three-dimensional fluoroscopy

Background

Iliosacral screw fixation is a popular technique for treatment of unstable pelvic injuries involving the posterior ring. However, screw malposition may result in dangerous complications involving injury to adjacent neurovascular structures. This study was conducted in order to evaluate the results and efficacy of using three-dimensional fluoroscopy in the performance of iliosacral screw fixation.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients (31 cases, two bilateral) who suffered injury to the pelvic ring requiring surgical treatment were included in this study. According to the Association for Osteosynthesis-Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO-OTA) classification, there were 14 patients with type B, 13 patients with type C, and 2 patients with a bilateral sacral fracture. The mean age of patients was 39 years. Once the guide pin had been inserted, its safety was confirmed using three-dimensional fluoroscopy; screw fixation was then performed. Eighteen patients underwent percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation and anterior fixation, while 11 patents underwent screw fixation only. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) was performed for evaluation of the screw position, including any invasion into the sacral foramen or canal and neurovascular injury. The perforation of the screw was divided according to the location (sacral zones I, II, and III) and the degree (grade 0, no perforation; grade 1, perforation <2 mm; grade 2, perforation between 2 and 4 mm; grade 3, perforation >4 mm).

Results

The mean operation time was 35.6 min, and the mean radiation exposure time was 85.9 s. For accurate location of the guide pin, one patient underwent three-dimensional reconstruction twice. None of the patients required reoperation or suffered any neurovascular injury. Although seven cases involved perforation, all were less than 2 mm (grade 0: 24 cases, grade 1: 7 cases).

Conclusions

When performing percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation in a patient with an unstable pelvic ring injury, use of three-dimensional fluoroscopy may allow for accurate location of the screw and result in fewer complications.     

Supplemental S1 fixation for type C pelvic ring injuries: biomechanical study of a long iliosacral versus a transsacral screw

Background

A single iliosacral screw placed into the S1 vertebral body has been shown to be clinically unreliable for certain type C pelvic ring injuries. Insertion of a second supplemental iliosacral screw into the S1 or S2 vertebral body has been widely used. However, clinical fixation failures have been reported using this technique, and a supplemental long iliosacral or transsacral screw has been used. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical effect of a supplemental S1 long iliosacral screw versus a transsacral screw in an unstable type C vertically oriented sacral fracture model.

Materials and methods

A type C pelvic ring injury was created in ten osteopenic/osteoporotic cadaver pelves by performing vertical osteotomies through zone 2 of the sacrum and the ipsilateral pubic rami. The sacrum was reduced maintaining a 2-mm fracture gap to simulate a closed-reduction model. All specimens were fixed using one 7.0-mm iliosacral screw into the S1 body. A supplemental long iliosacral screw was placed into the S1 body in five specimens. A supplemental transsacral S1 screw was placed in the other five. Each pelvis underwent 100,000 cycles at 250 N, followed by loading to failure. Vertical displacements at 25,000, 50,000, 75,000, and 100,000 cycles and failure force were recorded.

Results

Vertical displacement increased significantly (p < 0.05) within each group with each increase in the number of cycles. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups in displacement or load to failure.

Conclusions

Although intuitively a transsacral screw may seem to be better than a long iliosacral screw in conveying additional stability to an unstable sacral fracture fixation construct, we were not able to identify any biomechanical advantage of one method over the other.

Level of evidence

Does not apply—biomechanical study.     

Robotic-guided sacro-pelvic fixation using S2 alar-iliac screws: feasibility and accuracy

Purpose

To review our experience with robotic guided S2-alar iliac (S2AI) screw placement.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent S2AI fixation with robotic guidance. Screw placement and deviation from the preoperative plan were assessed by fusing preoperative CT (with the planned S2AI screws) to postoperative CT. The software’s measurement tool was used to compare the planned vs. actual screw placements in axial and lateral views, at entry point to the S2 pedicle and at a 30 mm depth at the screws’ mid-shaft, in a resolution of 0.1 mm. Medical charts were reviewed for technical issues and intra-operative complications.

Results

35 S2AI screws were reviewed in 18 patients. The patients’ mean age was 60 years. No intra-operative complications that related to the placement of S2AI screws were reported and robotic guidance was successful in all 35 screws. Post-operative CT scans showed that all trajectories were accurate. No violations of the iliac cortex or breaches of the anterior sacrum were noted. At the entry point, the screw deviated from the pre-operative plan by 3.0 ± 2.2 mm in the axial plane and 1.8 ± 1.6 mm in the lateral plane. At 30 mm depth, the screw deviated from the pre-operative plan by 2.1 ± 1.3 mm in the axial plane and 1.2 ± 1.1 mm in the lateral plane.

Conclusions

Robotic guided S2AI screw placement is feasible and accurate. No screw malpositions or complications that related to the placement of S2AI screws occurred in this series. Larger studies are needed to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of robotic guided sacral-pelvic fixation.

     

Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing

Purpose

For posterior spinal stabilization, loosening of pedicle screws at the bone-screw interface is a clinical complication, especially in the osteoporotic population. Axial pullout testing is the standard pre-clinical testing method for new screw designs although it has questioned clinical relevance. The aim of this study was to determine the fixation strength of three current osteoporotic fixation techniques and to investigate whether or not pullout testing results can directly relate to those of the more physiologic fatigue testing.

Methods

Thirty-nine osteoporotic, human lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with pedicle screws according to four treatment groups: (1) screw only (control), (2) prefilled augmentation, (3) screw injected augmentation, and (4) unaugmented screws with an increased diameter. Toggle testing was first performed on one pedicle, using a cranial-caudal sinusoidal, cyclic (1.0 Hz) fatigue loading applied at the screw head. The initial compressive forces ranged from 25 to 75 N. Peak force increased stepwise by 25 N every 250 cycles until a 5.4-mm screw head displacement. The contralateral screw then underwent pure axial pullout (5 mm/min).

Results

When compared to the control group, screw injected augmentation increased fatigue force (27 %, p = 0.045) while prefilled augmentation reduced fatigue force (?7 %, p = 0.73). Both augmentation techniques increased pullout force compared to the control (ps < 0.04). Increasing the screw diameter by 1 mm increased pullout force (24 %, p = 0.19), fatigue force (5 %, p = 0.73), and induced the least stiffness loss (?29 %) from control.

Conclusions

For the osteoporotic spine, screw injected augmentation showed the best biomechanical stability. Although pullout testing was more sensitive, the differences observed were not reflected in the more physiological fatigue testing, thus casting further doubt on the clinical relevance of pullout testing.     

Technik der perkutanen SI-Verschraubung mit Unterstützung durch konventionellen C-Bogen

Background

During percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation, fluoroscopy with a conventional C-arm X-ray unit is still the standard procedure for intraoperative orientation. Lateral sacral images in combination with the inlet and outlet view are always necessary. Nevertheless, the complex pelvic anatomy makes it difficult to prevent malpositioning of screws.

Operative technique

Defining the correct entry into the bone is the decisive step for ideal screw placement. The better this is defined, the larger safety margins will be concerning cortical perforation by the screws. In the lateral view, an entry ventral to the sacral canal has to be avoided as well as an entry into the cranial half of the first sacral vertebra. To improve the surgeon’s three-dimensional orientation with the help of his personal experience and two-dimensional images, it is recommended to place the tip of the screws in the center of the sacrum (in AP view) whenever possible. Routinely performed postoperative CT imaging of 24 screws, consecutively implanted according to the standards described, revealed no case of malpositioning.

Conclusion

Standard X-ray views in combination with standardized aiming of screw entry position and final screw thread position enable the surgeon to find the “safe zone” for iliosacral screw insertion and to prevent iliosacral screw malpositioning with high accuracy.     

Posterior bridging osteosynthesis for traumatic sacroiliac joint dislocation: a report of seven cases

Objective

To evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic results in patients treated for 61C3-2 (OTA class) pelvic ring disruption with a posterior bridging sacroiliac fixation.

Design

Retrospective clinical and radiological study.

Setting

University Hospital.

Patients/participants

Between May 2002 and March 2003, seven patients with sacroiliac dislocation were treated with a technique developed for the treatment of pelvic injuries with vertical and horizontal instability.

Intervention

We applied spino-pelvic fixation techniques, using spine instrumentation, to stabilize an SI dislocation. This technique consists of two 5 mm diameter screws inserted into the S1 pedicle and S2 ala. A 5.5 mm rod joins the 2 sacral screws to two 7 mm screws placed into the posterior iliac crest and secured into the cancellous mass of the posterior ilium . The described technique stabilizes the SI-joint by performing a bridging osteosynthesis instead of the commonly performed iliosacral screw osteosynthesis passing the SI-joint. Symphyseal platting is performed to reduce and stabilize the anterior ring if necessary.

Main outcome measurements

Data were analyzed as follows: pelvic fracture classification; functional outcome; radiographic outcome; Leg length discrapency; and CT scan aspect of the sacroiliac joint.

Results

Associated pelvic injuries were present in all the patients and include symphysis rupture and acetabular fractures. Four of the seven patients had fractures of the lower extremities. Follow-up was available for all patients at an average of 27 months (range, 32–24 months). Neither septic nor cutaneous complications were reported. No loss of post-op reduction and no fixation failure were observed. The functional results noted at the last examination were satisfactory with a mean Majeed score of 93.

Conclusion

In our opinion, this surgical technique may be indicated in Tile type C1.2 (61C3-2 OTA class) pelvic ring disruption. It obviously reaches its limits in sacral fractures. The technique described provides effective control of vertical displacement while providing a certain degree of horizontal mobility to facilitate reduction and osteosynthesis of anterior lesions. The quality of the fixation allowed early weight bearing.     

Iliosacral Resections of Pelvic Malignant Tumors and Reconstruction with Nonvascular Bilateral Fibular Autografts

Background

Iliosacral resection of pelvic malignant tumors and subsequent reconstruction have tested the ingenuity of orthopedic oncologists because of the difficulty of oncological wide resection and the complex biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint render reconstruction challenging. This study compared the functional and surgical outcomes of a biological reconstruction technique with the lack of reconstruction following iliosacral resection.

Methods

Twenty-six consecutive cases with malignant iliac tumors involving the sacrum were retrospectively reviewed. These cases underwent iliosacral resection (type I/IV) followed by no reconstruction or a biological reconstruction blinded to authors between 1997 and 2007. After iliosacral resection, 12 cases underwent reconstruction with nonvascular fibular grafts and plate and/or pedicle screw-rod; the other 14 cases did not undergo reconstruction.

Results

The median follow-up was 84.42 (range, 32?C165) months. The local recurrence rate in the reconstruction group was 8.33?% (1/12) with 14.29?% (2/14) in the group without reconstruction. The functional score of the biological reconstruction group was significantly higher than that of the no-reconstruction group as determined by Student??s t test. In the biological reconstruction group, bone fusion occurred in 91?% of cases and fibula hypertrophy was observed in 41.7?%. Complications included sciatic nerve palsy, broken screws, intractable pain, nonunion, pelvic oblique, and leg-length discrepancy.

Conclusions

After iliosacral resections of pelvic malignant tumors, the biologic reconstruction of these defects could restore spinopelvic stability and continuity. The double-barrel fibular autograft combined with the plate or pedicle screw-rod system is an effective reconstruction method for both optimal short- and long-term stability.     

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Screw Loosening after Iliosacral Screw Fixation for Posterior Pelvic Ring Injury

Purposes

Screw loosening is a common complication of iliosacral screw fixation, with subsequent loss of stability and fracture re-displacement. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for screw loosening after iliosacral screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injury.

Methods

A total of 135 patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries who were treated with iliosacral screw fixation in our department between July 2015 and April 2021 were selected for this retrospective analysis. The possible risk factors for screw loosening were investigated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of patient demographics and trauma-related and iatrogenic variables, including age, sex, body mass index, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) index, mechanism of injury, Young–Burgess classification, site of injury, type of injury, type of screw, mode of fixation, numbers of guidewire adjustments, accuracy of screw position, and quality of fracture reduction.

Results

The incidence of screw loosening was 15.6% (n = 21). The mean duration for screw loosening was 3.2 ± 1.5 months after operation. Univariate analysis results showed that the Young–Burgess classification, type of injury, site of injury, type of screw, mode of fixation, and OSTA index might be related to screw loosening (p < 0.05). According to the multivariate logistic regression, vertical shear injuries (Odds ratios [OR] 9.80, 95% Confidence intervals [CI] [1.96–73.28], p = 0.008), type of injury (OR 0.25, 95% CI [0.13–0.79], p = 0.027), common screws (OR 6.94, 95% CI [1.53–31.40], p = 0.012), screws insertion only at the level of the first sacral segment (S1) (OR 8.79, 95% CI [1.18–65.46], p = 0.034), injury site located in the medial sacral foramina (OR 6.28, 95% CI [1.16–34.06], p = 0.033), and lower OSTA index [OR 0.41, 95% CI [0.24–0.71], p = 0.001] were significantly related to screw loosening.

Conclusions

Vertical shear injuries, sacral fractures, injury site located in the medial sacral foramina, and lower OSTA index are significantly associated with the postoperative occurrence of screw loosening. Transiliac–transsacral screw fixation and screws insertion both at the level of the S1 and second sacral segment can prevent screw loosening.     

Feasibility study on the potential of a spiral blade in osteoporotic distal femur fracture fixation

Introduction

Osteoporotic fractures of the distal femur (primary as well as periprosthetic) are a growing problem in today’s trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Therefore, this feasibility study should identify the biomechanical potential of a (commercially available) spiral blade in the distal femur as compared to a single screw without any additional plate fixation. Additionally, the influence of cement augmentation was investigated.

Materials and methods

An artificial low density bone model was either instrumented with a perforated spiral blade or a 5 mm locking screw only. Additionally, the influence of 1 ml cement augmentation was investigated. All specimens were tested with static pull-out and cyclic loading (50 to 250 N with an increment of 0.1 N/cycle).

Results

In the non-augmented groups, the mean pull-out force was significantly higher for the blade fixation (p < 0.001). In the augmented groups, the difference was statistically not significant (p = 0.217). Augmentation could increase pull-out force significantly by 72 % for the blade and 156 % for the screw, respectively (p = 0.001). The mean number of cycles to failure in the non-augmented groups was 12,433 (SD 465) for the blade and 2,949 (SD 215) for the screw, respectively (p < 0.001). In the augmented group, the blade reached 13,967 (SD 1,407) cycles until failure and the screw reached 4,413 (SD 1,598), respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The investigated spiral blade was mechanically superior, significantly, as compared to a screw in the distal femur. These results back up the further development of a distal femoral blade with spiral blade fixation for the treatment of osteoporotic distal femur fractures.     

Mid-term results of computer-assisted cervical reconstruction for rheumatoid cervical spines

Study design

A retrospective single-center study.

Summary and background

We routinely have used C1–C2 transarticular and cervical pedicle screw fixations to reconstruct highly destructed unstable rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cervical lesions. However, there is little data on mid-term results of surgical reconstruction for rheumatoid cervical disorders, particularly, cervical pedicle screw fixation.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term surgical results of computer-assisted cervical reconstruction for such lesions.

Methods

Seventeen subjects (4 men, 13 women; mean age, 61 ± 9 years) with RA cervical lesions who underwent C1–C2 transarticular screw fixation or occipitocervical fixation, with at least 5 years follow-up were studied. A frameless, stereotactic, optoelectronic, CT-based image-guidance system, was used for correct screw placement. Variables including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Ranawat class, EuroQol (EQ-5D), atlantodental interval, and Ranawat values before, and at 2 and 5 years after surgery, were evaluated. Furthermore, screw perforation rates were evaluated.

Results

The lesions included atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS, n = 6), AAS + vertical subluxation (VS, n = 7), and AAS + VS + subaxial subluxation (n = 4). There was significant neurological improvement at 2 years after surgery, as evidenced by the JOA scores, Ranawat class, and the EQ-5D utility weight. However, at 5 years after surgery, there was a deterioration of this improvement. The Ranawat values before, and at 2 and 5 years after surgery, were not significantly different. Major screw perforation rate was 2.1 %. No neural and vascular complications associated with screw insertion were observed.

Conclusions

Subjects with rheumatoid cervical lesions who underwent C1–C2 transarticular screw fixation or occipitocervical fixation using a pedicle screw had significantly improved clinical parameters at 2 years after surgery. However, there was a deterioration of this improvement at 5 years post surgery.     

Multiaxial high-modularity spinopelvis (HMSP) fixation device in neuromuscular scoliosis: a comparative study

Purpose

To compare radiological and clinical results in patients operated for neuromuscular scoliosis with pelvic fixation using high-modularity spinopelvic screw (HMSP) designed by authors.

Methods

Of 54 patients with neuromuscular scoliosis, group 1 comprised of 27 patients with conventional pelvic fixation; and group 2 comprised of 27 patients using HMSP. Results were evaluated radiologically and functionally. We compared preoperative and postoperative complications, especially the loosening or breakage of spinopelvis fixation device, failure of fixation, and the change of shadow around the spinopelvis fixation device.

Results

There was no difference of correctional power, preoperative average Cobb’s angle of each group was 79.8 and 75 to postoperative 30.2 and 28.3 (P < 0.05). Pelvic obliquity improved from average 18.3°–8.9° in group I and average 24.3°–12.5° in group II (P < 0.05). However, there was no difference between two groups (P > 0.05). Average blood loss was 2,698 ml in group 1 and 2,414.8 ml in group 2 (P > 0.05). Average operative time was 360 min in group 1 and 332 min in group 2 (P = 0.30). There was no difference found between two groups regarding gait and functional evaluation. On the all cases of group 1 and 2, the change of shadow around the spinopelvis fixation device was observed. There was one case of the fracture of spinopelvis fixation device in group I.

Conclusion

There was no difference of Cobb’s angle and correctional power between the groups using HMSP when compared with the group using standard spinopelvis fixation device. Therefore, HMSP can be used more effectively in case of neuromuscular scoliosis.     

Are Quadrilateral Surface Buttress Plates Comparable to Traditional Forms of Transverse Acetabular Fracture Fixation?

Background

Several construct options exist for transverse acetabular fracture fixation. Accepted techniques use a combination of column plates and lag screws. Quadrilateral surface buttress plates have been introduced as potential fixation options, but as a result of their novelty, biomechanical data regarding their stabilizing effects are nonexistent. Therefore, we aimed to determine if this fixation method confers similar stability to traditional forms of fixation.

Questions/purposes

We biomechanically compared two acetabular fixation plates with quadrilateral surface buttressing with traditional forms of fixation using lag screws and column plates.

Methods

Thirty-five synthetic hemipelves with a transverse transtectal acetabular fracture were allocated to one of five groups: anterior column plate + posterior column lag screw, posterior column plate + anterior column lag screw, anterior and posterior column lag screws only, infrapectineal plate + anterior column plate, and suprapectineal plate alone. Specimens were loaded for 1500 cycles up to 2.5x body weight and stiffness was calculated. Thereafter, constructs were destructively loaded and failure loads were recorded.

Results

After 1500 cycles, final stiffness was not different with the numbers available between the infrapectineal (568 ± 43 N/mm) and suprapectineal groups (602 ± 87 N/mm, p = 0.988). Both quadrilateral plates were significantly stiffer than the posterior column buttress plate with supplemental lag screw fixation group (311 ± 99 N/mm, p < 0.006). No difference in stiffness was identified with the numbers available between the quadrilateral surface plating groups and the lag screw group (423 ± 219 N/mm, p > 0.223). The infrapectineal group failed at the highest loads (5.4 ± 0.6 kN) and this was significant relative to the suprapectineal (4.4 ± 0.3 kN; p = 0.023), lag screw (2.9 ± 0.8 kN; p < 0.001), and anterior buttress plate with posterior column lag screw (4.0 ± 0.6 kN; p = 0.001) groups.

Conclusions

Quadrilateral surface buttress plates spanning the posterior and anterior columns are biomechanically comparable and, in some cases, superior to traditional forms of fixation in this synthetic hemipelvis model.

Clinical Relevance

Quadrilateral surface buttress plates may present a viable alternative for the treatment of transtectal transverse acetabular fractures. Clinical studies are required to fully define the use of this new form of fixation for such fractures when accessed through the anterior intrapelvic approach.     

Comparative study of the closed reduction percutaneous cannulated screw fixation and open reduction palmar locking plate fixation in the treatment of AO type A2 distal radius fractures

Introduction

The present study was designed to demonstrate the efficacy of standard 4.0 mm cannulated screw fixation by comparing it with palmar locking plate fixation in the treatment of acute, unstable, simple extra-articular distal radius fractures.

Materials and methods

We prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed outcomes data for 65 patients aged between 18 and 60 with AO type A2 fractures treated with closed reduction, percutaneous cannulated screw fixation (CRPCS n = 34) or open reduction palmar locking plate fixation (ORPLP n = 31). Range of motion, grip strength, Gartland–Werley and QuickDASH scores were compared at 2 months after surgery, and final follow-up (mean 32 months, range 12–90). Deterioration in radiographic parameters were measured and compared. Operative time and return to preinjury activity were evaluated.

Results

Parameters did not differ significantly between the groups at either time point with respect to grip strength or range of motion, except pronation and supination; they were better in the CRPCS group (p = 0.005 and 0.025, respectively) at 2 month follow-up. The Gartland–Werley and QuickDASH scores obtained at final follow-up were similar for each group and lacked statistical significance. Group comparison for the deterioration of radiologic parameters showed no significant difference. CRPCS group had significantly shorter operative time (p = 0.001) and there was no significant differences between the groups regarding the return to preinjury activity (p = 0.129).

Conclusions

CRPCS group was found to be as successful as ORPLP group and it may be suitable in the case of young, active individuals with AO type A2 distal radius fractures.     

Cement augmentation of lag screws: an investigation on biomechanical advantages

Background

In trauma surgery, lag screws are commonly used. However, in osteoporotic bone, anchorage can be considerably compromised. This study investigates the biomechanical potential of cement augmentation in terms of improved fixation.

Methods

36 Surrogate osteoporotic bone specimens were utilised in three biomechanical experiments, each comparing 6 augmented with 6 non-augmented samples. Standard partially-threaded lag screws (Synthes) were placed following surgical standard. For the augmented groups, 0.4 ml of polymethylmethacrylate was injected into the pre-drilled hole prior to screw placement. Interfragmentary compression was determined using a cannulated ring compression sensor. Maximum torque was recorded with a torque wrench. Compressive relaxation after 24 h, relaxation after loosening and re-tightening the screw as well as maximum compression and torque at failure were measured.

Findings

Mean relaxation was significantly lower for the augmented group (p < 0.01). After 24 h, a remaining fragmental compression of 62 % for the augmented and 52 % for the non-augmented specimens was found. Loosening and re-tightening of the screw did not affect the compressive relaxation when augmentation was applied (p = 0.529), compared to an increased relaxation after re-tightening in the non-augmented group (p = 0.04). The mean maximum compression and torque until failure were significantly higher for the augmented group (p < 0.001).

Interpretation

Cement augmentation of lag screws can improve fixation stability in terms of installing and maintaining interfragmentary compression. Effects of relaxation can be reduced and re-tightening of screws is possible without compromising the fixation. Particularly in reduced bone mass, augmentation of lag screws can markedly increase the security of the technique.