Once-daily simeprevir (TMC435) with peginterferon/ribavirin for treatment-naïve hepatitis C genotype 1-infected patients in Japan: the DRAGON study

Background

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of simeprevir (TMC435), a once-daily, noncovalent, oral hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor, was evaluated in combination with peginterferon α-2a/ribavirin (PegIFNα-2a/RBV) for treatment-naïve, HCV genotype 1-infected patients in Japan.

Methods

In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial in Japan, ninety-two patients received either simeprevir (50 or 100 mg QD) for 12 or 24 weeks with PegIFNα-2a/RBV for 24 or 48 weeks (according to response-guided therapy [RGT] criteria), or PegIFNα-2a/RBV for 48 weeks (PR48 group).

Results

Compared with the PR48 group, plasma HCV RNA reductions in the simeprevir groups were rapid and more substantial (Week 4: ?5.2, ?5.2 and ?2.9 log₁₀IU/mL for simeprevir 50 mg combined, 100 mg combined, and PR48 groups, respectively). High rapid virologic response rates (83, 90, and 8 % for simeprevir 50 mg combined, 100 mg combined, and PR48 groups, respectively) led to high sustained virologic response rates (77–92 %, compared with 46 % for PR48). All but one of the simeprevir-treated patients were eligible to complete treatment after 24 weeks (RGT). Relapse rates in simeprevir-treated patients were low (8–17 %, compared with 36 % for the PR48 group). There were no notable differences in the safety profile between the simeprevir and PR48 groups.

Conclusions

The addition of simeprevir QD to PegIFNα-2a/RBV, as compared with PegIFNα-2a/RBV alone, demonstrated potent antiviral activity and significantly improved the rates of sustained virologic response, with a shortened 24-week treatment duration, in treatment-naive patients infected with HCV genotype 1 in Japan. Simeprevir was generally safe and well tolerated. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00996476).     

Safety and efficacy of faldaprevir in combination with pegylated interferon α‐2b and ribavirin in Japanese patients with genotype‐1 chronic hepatitis C virus infection

Aim

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A A protease inhibitor faldaprevir plus pegylated interferon α‐2b and ribavirin (PegIFNα‐2b/RBV) in Japanese patients with HCV genotype‐1 infection.

Methods

Treatment‐naïve patients were randomized (1:1) to faldaprevir 120 mg q.d. for 12 or 24 weeks (response‐guided therapy [RGT], n = 44), or faldaprevir 240 mg q.d. for 12 weeks (n = 43), each combined with PegIFNα‐2b/RBV for 24 or 48 weeks (RGT). Response‐guided therapy was based on early treatment success (HCV RNA <25 IU/mL at week 4 and <25 IU/mL undetected at week 8). Treatment‐experienced patients received 240 mg q.d. for 24 weeks, plus PegIFNα‐2b/RBV RGT (24 or 48 weeks, prior relapsers, n = 29) or PegIFNα‐2b/RBV (48 weeks, 5 prior partial responders/breakthroughs, 10 prior null responders). The primary objective was safety; sustained virologic response 12 weeks post‐treatment (SVR12) was a secondary end‐point.

Results

All except one patient experienced drug‐related adverse events. Adverse events led to faldaprevir discontinuation in 1 (2%), 13 (20%), and 3 (6.8%) patients on faldaprevir 120 mg, faldaprevir 240 mg 12 weeks, and faldaprevir 240 mg 24 weeks, respectively. The SVR12 rates were: 86% with faldaprevir 120 mg and 74% with faldaprevir 240 mg among treatment‐naïve patients; and 86%, 60%, and 40% among prior relapsers, partial responders/breakthroughs, and null responders, respectively.

Conclusions

In treatment‐naïve Japanese patients, faldaprevir 120 mg q.d. plus PegIFNα‐2b/RBV was better tolerated than faldaprevir 240 mg q.d. plus PegIFNα‐2b/RBV, with at least comparable efficacy. In treatment‐experienced patients, most prior relapsers achieved SVR12 with 24 weeks of faldaprevir 240 mg q.d. plus PegIFNα‐2b/RBV. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01579474.

     

Simeprevir added to peginterferon and ribavirin lessens time with fatigue,depressive symptoms and functional limitations in patients with chronic hepatitis C compared with peginterferon and ribavirin: results from 1161 patients in the QUEST‐1, QUEST‐2 and PROMISE studies

The value of adding simeprevir (SMV) vs placebo (PBO) to peginterferon and ribavirin (PR) for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection was examined using patient‐reported outcomes (PROs); further, concordance of PROs with virology endpoints and adverse events (AEs) was explored. Patients (n = 768 SMV/PR, n = 393 PBO/PR) rated fatigue (FSS), depressive symptoms (CES‐D) and functional impairment (WPAI: Hepatitis C Productivity, Daily Activity and Absenteeism) at baseline and throughout treatment in three randomised, double‐blind trials comparing the addition of SMV or PBO during initial 12 weeks of PR. PR was administered for 48 weeks (PBO group) and 24/48 weeks (SMV group) using a response‐guided therapy (RGT) approach. Mean PRO scores (except Absenteeism) worsened from baseline to Week 4 to the same extent in both groups but reverted after Week 24 for SMV/PR and only after Week 48 for PBO/PR. Accordingly, there was a significantly lower area under the curve (baseline–Week 60, AUC₆₀) and fewer weeks with clinically important worsening of scores in the SMV/PR group at any time point. Incidences of patients with fatigue and anaemia AEs were similar in both groups, but FSS scores showed that clinically important increases in fatigue lasted a mean of 6.9 weeks longer with PBO/PR (P < 0.001). PRO score subgroup analysis indicated better outcomes for patients who met the criteria for RGT or achieved sustained virological response 12 weeks post‐treatment (SVR12); differences in mean PRO scores associated with fibrosis level were only observed with PBO/PR. Greater efficacy of SMV/PR enabled reduced treatment duration and reduced time with PR‐related AEs without adding to AE severity.     

Multicenter Experience using Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir ± RBV to Treat HCV GT 1 Relapsers after Simeprevir and Sofosbuvir Treatment

Introduction and aim. Approximately 10%-15% of patients with hepatitis C genotype 1 (HCV GT1) experience virological relapse after all-oral antiviral regimen using simeprevir (SMV) and sofosbuvir (SOF). The efficacy and safety of treating such relapsers using ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) with/without ribavirin (RBV) has been limited.Objective. Report the virological response and safety of LDV/SOF with/without RBV for 12-24 weeks in treating HCV GT1 relapsers after SMV + SOF.Material and methods. Patients treated with standardized clinical protocol utilizing LDV/SOF with/without RBV at three transplant centers were retrospectively reviewed.Results. Forty-five patients (29% post-LT, 82% male, 13% non-white, 73% subtype 1a, 86% IL28B CT/ TT, 78% F3-4) started LDV/SOF with/without RBV at a median of 22 weeks (range 7-55 weeks) after the last dose of SMV+SOF treatment. Thirty-seven patients received LDV/SOF for 24 weeks (24/37 patients with RBV) and eight patients received LDV/SOF for 12 weeks (5/8 patients with RBV). RBV dose was adjusted for renal function. Sixteen patients who were RBV-ineligible received LDV/SOF without RBV for 12 or 24 weeks. SVR 12 was achieved in 96% (43/45) of patients. Baseline viral load, RBV use, or GT1 subtype did not impact SVR 12. Minimal adverse events were reported in those without RBV; 45% of patients who received RBV developed significant anemia requiring RBV dose reduction and/or discontinuation. In LT recipients, minimal immunosuppression dose adjustments were required and no biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred.Conclusions. Treatment with LDV/SOF with/without RBV for 12-24 weeks was very well tolerated and resulted in high SVR 12 rates (96%) in HCV GT1 relapsers to SMV + SOF treatment.     

Influencia de la puntuación MELD basal en la eficacia del tratamiento de la hepatitis C con sofosbuvir y simeprevir

Introduction

There are few published studies on predictors of response to treatment with sofosbuvir and simeprevir in HCV patients.

Extended treatment with pegylated interferon alfa/ribavirin in patients with genotype 2/3 chronic hepatitis C who do not achieve a rapid virological response: final analysis of the randomised N-CORE trial

Background and aims

The combination of pegylated interferon alfa/ribavirin will likely remain the treatment of choice for HCV genotype 2/3 patients in financially constrained countries for the foreseeable future. Patients with poor on-treatment response may benefit from treatment extension. This study examined the effect of 48 versus 24 weeks of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin on the sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with HCV genotype 2/3 who did not achieve rapid virological response (RVR).

Methods

N-CORE was a multicentre, randomised, phase III study. HCV genotype 2/3 patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin without a rapid but with an early virological response were randomised at week 24 to stop treatment (Arm A) or continue to 48 weeks (Arm B). The primary efficacy endpoint was SVR.

Results

Two hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled. End of treatment response was similar in both treatment arms. SVR24 rates were not significantly greater in the extended treatment arm compared with the standard 24-week treatment in either the intention-to-treat or the per-protocol populations (61 vs. 52 %, p = 0.1934 and 63 vs. 52 %, p = 0.1461, respectively). Serious adverse events occurred more frequently in patients receiving extended treatment duration (12 %) versus 24-week therapy (4 %).

Conclusions

It is unclear whether the extension of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin treatment may benefit HCV genotype 2/3 patients who do not achieve RVR. The study was stopped early because recruitment was slower than anticipated, and this may have limited the statistical impact of these findings.     

Meta-analysis of patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 6: 48 weeks with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is superior to 24 weeks

Background

Hepatitis C virus genotype 6 (HCV-6) is common in patients from Southeast Asia and the surrounding regions. Optimal treatment duration for HCV-6 is unknown given the inconclusive evidence from studies with varying methodologies and small sample sizes.

Methods

A literature search for ‘genotype 6’ in MEDLINE and EMBASE in October 2013 produced 161 and 251 articles, respectively. Additional abstracts were identified from four major international GI/liver conferences in 2012/2013. Inclusion criteria were original studies with ≥10 HCV-6 treatment-naïve patients treated with pegylated interferon + ribavirin (PEG IFN+RBV). Exclusion criteria were coinfections with HBV, HIV, other HCV genotypes, and/or other liver diseases. Primary outcome was pooled sustained virologic response (SVR). Heterogeneity was defined by Cochrane Q test (p value of 0.10) and I ² statistic (≥50 %).

Results

A total of 13 studies with 641 patients were included. The pooled SVR estimate was 77 % (CI 70–83 %) (Q value = 38.4, p value <0.001, I ² = 68.7 %) overall, 79 % (CI 73–84 %) for the 48-week group and 59 % (CI 46–70 %) for 24-week group, respectively. In studies with direct comparison of the two groups, SVR was superior in patients treated for 48 versus 24 weeks, OR 1.9 (CI 1.08–3.2, p = 0.026). In studies with direct comparison of patients with rapid virologic response (RVR), there was no difference in SVR between 48 versus 24 weeks, OR 1.74 (CI 0.65–4.64, p = 0.27).

Conclusion

Hepatitis C virus genotype 6 patients should be treated for 48 weeks, and those who achieve RVR may receive the shorter 24-week treatment duration. The high SVR (~80 %) with 48 weeks of PEG IFN+RBV therapy may be a cost-effective option for HCV-6 patients from resource-poor regions.     

Response-Guided Therapy for Hepatitis C Genotype 2 and 3 in Those with HIV Coinfection

Background

Current guidelines recommend that interferon-based treatment of hepatitis C (HCV) genotype 2 or 3 in those with HIV coinfection should be for 48 weeks, especially if HCV PCR remains positive after 4 weeks of treatment.

Aim

To examine a single-center experience using response-guided therapy (RGT) using pegylated interferon (PegIFN) and weight-based ribavirin (RBV) for treating HCV genotype 2 or 3 in those with HIV coinfection.

Methods

Electronic medical records were used to identify patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 HIV coinfection seen at the Toronto General Hospital Immunodeficiency Clinic from February 2003 to December 2012. HCV PCR was tested after every 4 weeks of treatment until it was negative (<50 IU/mL). RGT protocol was as follows: Those with HCV PCR first negative after 4 weeks (VR4) were treated 24 weeks; first negative after 8 weeks (VR8) treated 36 weeks and VR12 treated 48 weeks.

Result

Database search identified 35 individuals with HCV genotype 2 or 3. Twelve were excluded. Total 23 patients completed the treatment and were included for data analysis. Eleven of 23 (48 %) achieved VR4 and eleven of 23 (48 %) achieved VR8. Only one individual had detectable viremia to week 12 and required 48 weeks of treatment. The majority (96 %) were successfully treated with <48 weeks of PegIFN–RBV therapy. One hundred percent achieved SVR with a response-guided HCV therapy.

Conclusion

The use of response-guided therapy allows therapy to be shortened in the majority of individuals. HCV PCR testing should be performed every 4 weeks during the first 12 weeks of therapy until HCV PCR is negative.     

Response to Peginterferon-alfa 2b and Ribavirin in Japanese Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 2

Background

The current standard treatment for patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) of genotype 2 is the combination of peginterferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) for 24 weeks.

Aims

We assessed the sustained virological response (SVR) rates in HCV genotype 2-infected Japanese patients in relation to the duration of treatment.

Methods

Between 2006 and 2009, among 147 patients with HCV genotype 2-infection in Chiba Prefecture, 138 consecutive patients were finally enrolled. Twenty-one, 97 and 20 patients were treated with PEG-IFN-alfa 2b plus RBV for 16, 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. Epidemiological data and treatment outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. HCV RNA was measured with COBAS AMPLICOR HCV Monitor Test v. 2.0.

Results

The overall SVR rate was 82.6% (114 of 138): treatment-naïve patients, 86.4% (89 of 103); patients with history of previous treatment, 71.4% (25 of 35). Patients treated for 16, 24 and 48 weeks obtained SVR rates of 66.6% (14 of 21), 86.5% (84 of 97) and 80.0 (16 of 20), respectively.

Conclusions

The SVR rates of PEG-IFN-alfa 2b plus RBV in Japanese patients were similar to those in previous studies. Combination treatment for 24 weeks for some patients infected with HCV genotype 2 may be superior to that for 16 weeks. More precise patient selection will be needed to shorten the combination treatment.     

Consensus Interferon Plus Ribavirin for Hepatitis C Genotype 3 Patients Previously Treated With Pegylated Interferon Plus Ribavirin

Background

Not enough data are available about the effectiveness of consensus interferon (CIFN) among HCV genotype 3 patients who failed to respond to pegylated interferon and ribavirin.

Objectives

We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CIFN and ribavirin in non-responders and relapsers to pegylated interferon with ribavirin therapy.

Patients and Methods

This open-label investigator-initiated study included 44 patients who received CIFN 15 µg /day plus ribavirin 800-1200 mg daily. In patients with an early virological response (EVR), the dose of CIFN was reduced to 15 µg thrice a week for further 36 weeks. Patients with delayed virological response continued to receive daily CIFN plus ribavirin to complete 48 weeks. The patients were considered “non-responders” if there were less than 2 log reduction in HCV RNA at 12 weeks and detectable HCV RNA at 24 weeks.

Results

Twenty-four patients (55%) were non-responders and 20 patients were relapsers to the previous treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (mean age 43.6 ± 9.4 years, males 25 (57%)). Nine patients were clinically cirrhotic (Child A). End of treatment virological response was achieved in 19 (43.1%) patients and sustained virological response (SVR) occurred in 12 (27.3%). Out of these 12 patients, eight were non-responders and four were relapsers to the previous treatment. Advanced fibrosis or clinical cirrhosis was associated with low SVR. Adverse events were fever, myalgia, anorexia, depression, and weight loss. Two patients received granulocyte colony stimulating factor for transient neutropenia. Seven patients were given erythropoietin to improve hemoglobin, and six were treated for mild depression. Two patients developed portosystemic encephalopathy.

Conclusions

More than one-quarter of treatment-experienced patients with HCV genotype 3 achieved SVR after re-treatment with consensus interferon plus ribavirin.     

Add‐on effects of fluvastatin in simeprevir/pegylated‐interferon/ribavirin combination therapy for patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection: A randomized controlled study

Background

The Japan Society of Hepatology guidelines indicate that hepatitis C virus (HCV) protease inhibitor combination therapy with simeprevir (SMV), pegylated‐interferon (Peg‐IFN), and ribavirin (RBV) is a therapeutic option for patients who fail to respond to a direct direct‐acting antiviral‐containing regimen. However, treatment outcomes have room for improvement. Fluvastatin (FLV) add‐on treatment in Peg‐IFN and RBV combination therapy for HCV‐infected patients significantly improved the sustained virologic response (SVR), but the add‐on effect of FLV on SMV combination therapy is not well understood.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter study in which a total of 61 HCV genotype 1b‐infected patients were recruited and 60 eligible patients were randomly allocated to two groups that received 12 weeks of SMV/Peg‐IFN/RBV followed by 12 weeks of Peg‐IFN/RBV with or without 24 weeks of FLV. The SVR rate and adverse events were compared between the two groups.

Results

Thirty‐one patients were allocated to the FLV add‐on group and 29 patients were allocated to the control group. Baseline clinical factors, including median age, baseline platelet count, alanine aminotransferase level, HCV RNA titer, Fibrosis‐4 index, and rate of IL28B minor genotype, were all similar between the two groups. The rapid virologic response, end‐of‐treatment response rates, SVR rates at 24 weeks after treatment, and safety profiles were also similar between the two groups.

Conclusions

This prospective, randomized, multicenter study indicated that FLV had no add‐on effect when given with SMV/Peg‐IFN/RBV combination therapy for genotype 1b HCV‐infected patients.     

Baseline factors and very early viral response (week 1) for predicting sustained virological response in telaprevir-based triple combination therapy for Japanese genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C patients: a multicenter study

Background

Genetic polymorphisms near Interleukin 28B (IL28B) (rs8099917) and a rapid virological response (RVR) have been reported as predictors for a sustained virological response (SVR) to telaprevir (TVR)-based triple combination therapy. However, the association between SVR and viral kinetics earlier than week 4 after initiation of therapy remains unclear. Thus, we evaluated the SVR prediction ability of baseline factors and reduced hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels at week 1 after the initiation of TVR-based therapy in Japanese genotype-1b chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients.

Methods

A total of 156 Japanese CHC patients received a 24-week regimen of TVR-based therapy. Baseline factors and reduction in HCV RNA levels at weeks 1 and 4 after the initiation of therapy were analyzed for SVR prediction.

Results

Multiple logistic regression analysis for SVR in TVR-based therapy identified the IL28B TT genotype, a reduction of ≥4.7 log₁₀IU/mL in HCV RNA levels at week 1, RVR, and treatment-naïve/relapse. Whereas the SVR rate was higher than 90 % regardless of the reduction in HCV RNA levels at week 1 in patients with the TT genotype, a reduction of ≥4.7 log₁₀IU/mL in HCV RNA levels at week 1 was the strongest predictor of SVR in patients with the non-TT genotype, as determined by multiple logistic regression analysis (P = 0.0043).

Conclusions

The IL28B TT genotype is the most important baseline factor for predicting SVR, and a ≥4.7 log₁₀IU/mL reduction in HCV RNA at week 1 is a useful very early on-treatment predictor of SVR, especially in the non-TT genotype.     

The virological response in Koreans infected with HCV genotype 1 did not differ between groups treated with a full dose or reduced dose (≥80 % full dose) of peginterferon alfa-2a: a prospective randomized multicenter trial

Purpose

A high rate of sustained viral response (SVR) in Koreans with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is related to a favorable IL28B genotype. We compared two dosing strategies for peginterferon alfa-2a in Koreans with CHC and defined the combined effect of polymorphisms and dosing on the virological response.

Methods

A total of 178 treatment-naïve patients with CHC genotype 1 were prospectively enrolled. All patients were randomly assigned to treatment with one of two peginterferon alfa-2a regimens: 180 μg per week for 48 weeks (full-dose group) or 180 μg per week during the first 12 weeks followed by 135 μg per week for the next 36 weeks (dose-reduction group). Polymorphisms related to IL28B, ITPA, C20orf194 and SLC29A1 were studied.

Results

SVR rates did not differ between the full-dose and dose-reduction groups (56.5 and 51.2 %, respectively, p = 0.474). The frequency of additional reductions of the peginterferon dose because of adverse events was higher in the full-dose group than in the dose-reduction group. SVR rates in patients homozygous for the IL28B major allele were higher than those in patients for the other IL28B alleles. For patients with unfavorable IL28B genotypes, SVR was less likely to be achieved in the dose-reduction group than in the full-dose group.

Conclusions

In Koreans with HCV genotype 1, the virological response to treatment did not differ between a full dose and reduced dose (≥80 % of full dose) of peginterferon alfa-2a. However, in the patients with unfavorable IL28B genotypes, the full-dose treatment of peginterferon alfa-2a may be beneficial.     

Neue direkt antivirale Medikamente zur Behandlung der chronischen Hepatitis C 2014

Background

The development of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) against the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has seen enormous progress in recent years. In 2011, the first protease inhibitors boceprevir (BOC) and telaprevir (TLV) were approved, which still need to be combined with pegylated interferon α (PEG-IFN α) and ribavirin (RBV) and are used only in patients with genotype 1. With sofosbuvir (SOF) and simeprevir (SMV), two new DAA are available. More DAA are in clinical development.

Objectives

Which changes in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection can be expected with the approval of the new DAA in 2014? Relevant phase IIb and phase III studies for the approval in 2014 were considered for drugs approved by the FDA or EMA at the editorial deadline.

Current data

For patients with genotype 1, the combination of SOF, SMV or faldaprevir with PEG-IFN α and RBV was successfully evaluated in phase III studies. In contrast to previous treatment with PEG-IFN α, RBV and telaprevir (TLV) or boceprevir (BOC), therapy can be shortened in most cases with a significantly improved side-effect profile. Cure rates above 80?% are possible. Data are also available for an interferon-free therapy with either SOF and RBV or SOF and SMV in GT-1 patients. SVR rates exceeding 60?% and up to 90?% are possible. However, treatment experience with these combinations is low and an unrestricted interferon-free therapy for genotype 1 should not be expected before 2015. For patients with genotypes 2 and 3, valid data for interferon-free therapies are available. The combination of SOF and RBV for 12 weeks in genotype 2 and 24 weeks for genotype 3 is effective and shows equal or superior cure rates with fewer side effects than the PEG-IFN α/RBV therapy.

Conclusion

For patients with genotype 1, the duration of therapy can be further reduced with better side effect profile. In certain situations, therapy without PEG-IFN α is possible and should be considered. For patients with genotypes 2 and 3, an interferon-free therapy will be standard of care in 2014.     

Interferon-associated hepatic steatosis is related to discrepancies in biochemical and virological responses of chronic hepatitis C to IFN-based therapy

Background and aims

A discrepancy in virological and biochemical responses may occur throughout interferon-based therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV). We aimed to explore the risk, associated factors, potential mechanisms, and impact on the treatment outcome of the discrepancy.

Subjects and methods

Consecutive 496, chronic HCV-infected patients receiving interferon/ribavirin or peginterferon/ribavirin for 24 weeks with a 24-week follow-up period were enrolled. Of 433 patients with pretreatment liver biopsy, 46 received serial liver biopsies at the end of treatment and end of follow-up to explore the corresponding change in liver histopathology. A virological/biochemical discrepancy was defined as persistently elevated alanine aminotransferase levels throughout the treatment period, despite the seronegativity for HCV RNA at least at the end of treatment. The sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as seronegativity for HCV RNA 6 months after the end of treatment.

Results

Virological/biochemical discrepancy was observed in 28.7 % (137/478) patients. The SVR rate was comparable between patients with (75.2 %, 103/137) and without discrepancy (81.2 %, 277/341, p = 0.14). For patients with discrepancy and SVR, 78 (75.7 %) had a subsequent normalization of alanine aminotransferase. Hepatic steatosis, advanced fibrosis, obesity, older age, peginterferon preparation, and low viral load were independently predictive of a virological/biochemical discrepancy. Serial liver histology showed that significant transient aggravation of hepatic steatosis during interferon-based therapy was observed among patients with a virological/biochemical discrepancy (difference 0.64 ± 0.93, p = 0.022), but not among those without it (difference 0.09 ± 0.69, p = 0.447).

Conclusions

A virological/biochemical discrepancy no longer exists after treatment cessation in most patients, and had little impact on the HCV treatment outcome. Treatment-related hepatic steatosis might play an important role in the pathogenesis of the discrepancy.     

IL28B polymorphisms predict the virological response to standard therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 4 infection

Background

Genome-wide association studies have recently revealed that several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the interleukin (IL) 28B genes can predict the sustained virological response (SVR) to pegylated interferon-α2a/b plus ribavirin in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-genotype 1 patients. However, data for patients infected with HCV genotype 4 (HCV-G4) are limited.

Aim

We analyzed the association of IL28B SNPs (hematological, biochemical, virological, and pathological factors) with SVR in the HCV-G4 monoinfected cohort of patients.

Patients and methods

One hundred twenty-nine treatment-naïve HCV-G4 patients undergoing treatment were recruited from three tertiary care centers in Saudi Arabia. Five IL28B SNPs (rs12979860, rs12980275, rs8105790, rs8099917, and rs72486680) were identified by polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing. SVR was statistically correlated with various clinical, histopathological, virological, and genetic parameters.

Results

SVR was significantly associated with the CC and AA alleles of rs12979860 (p = 0.008) and rs12980275 (p = 0.004), respectively. Moreover, albumin levels (p = 0.002) and platelet count (p = 0.039) showed significant differences in the SVR and No SVR groups. On multivariate analysis, the CC allele of rs12979860 (OR, 2.89; 95 % CI 1.6–6.2, p = 0.006) and albumin levels (OR, 1.2; 95 % CI 1.1–1.4, p = 0.001) independently predicted SVR.

Conclusions

IL28B polymorphism (CC allele of rs12979860) predicts the sustained response to antiviral therapy in HCV-G4.     

Predictive value of FIB-4 and APRI versus METAVIR on sustained virologic response in genotype 1 hepatitis C patients

Purpose

Advanced liver fibrosis is a negative predictor of virologic response in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. Biopsy, however, is invasive, costly, and carries some risk of complications.

Methods

Using data from the prospective, international cohort study PROPHESYS, we assessed two alternative noninvasive measures of fibrosis, the FIB-4 and AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), to predict virologic response in CHC patients.

Results

CHC genotype 1, monoinfected, treatment-naive patients prescribed peginterferon alfa-2a (40 KD)/ribavirin in accordance with country-specific legal and regulatory requirements and who had baseline METAVIR, FIB-4, and APRI scores (N = 1,592) were included in this analysis. Patients were stratified according to the baseline METAVIR, FIB-4, or APRI score to assess virologic response [hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA <50 IU/mL] by week 4 of treatment (rapid virologic response) and 24 weeks after untreated follow-up ]sustained virologic response (SVR)]. Baseline predictors of SVR were explored by multiple logistic regression, and the strength of the association between each fibrosis measure and SVR was evaluated. Both FIB-4 and APRI scores increased with increasing levels of biopsy-assessed fibrosis. The association between FIB-4 and SVR (p < 0.1 × 10^?30) was stronger than that between METAVIR (p = 3.86 × 10^?13) or APRI (p = 5.48 × 10^?6) and SVR. Baseline factors significantly associated with SVR included male gender, lower HCV RNA, lower FIB-4 score, no steatosis, and higher alanine aminotransferase ratio.

Conclusion

The FIB-4 index provides a valuable, noninvasive measure of fibrosis and can be used to predict virologic response in patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a (40  KD)/ribavirin.     

High SVR rate following retreatment of non-sustained virological responders to sofosbuvir based anti-HCV therapies regardless of RAS testing: A real-life multicenter study

ABSTRACT

Aim: Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir/daclatasvir/ribavirin (SOF/DCV/RBV) in treating non-sustained virological responders (non-SVR12) to prior sofosbuvir-based therapy, in absence of RAS testing in mass treatment, and determination of the optimal timing to start re-treatment.

Methods: Real-life prospective observational study included prior non-responders to 24-weeks SOF-RBV (n = 679, 67%) or 12-weeks SOF- RBV- PEG (n = 335, 33%). Patients were re-treated with daily SOF/DCV/RBV for 12 (n = 270) or 24 weeks (n = 744). The primary efficacy endpoint was SVR12. The primary safety endpoints were reported adverse events (AEs) from baseline to SVR12 time point.

Results: We included 1,014 patients [age 52 ± 9 years, 58.48% men]. Cirrhosis was documented in 46.98% and 27.5% of SOF-RBV and SOF-RBV-PEG non-responders respectively. Overall, SVR12 was 90.6% [92.2% for 12 weeks therapy and 90.05% for 24 weeks therapy]. Mild AEs occurred in 5.13% (n=52) and 3.1% (n=32) discontinued treatment including eight on-treatment mortalities. Higher baseline FIB-4 and shorter interval before starting retreatment (<6 months) were independent predictors of non-SVR12 on multivariate regression analysis.

Conclusion: SOF/DCV/RBV is an effective and safe treatment option for non-responders to prior sofosbuvir-based therapy. Six months interval before retreatment is optimal for achieving favorable SVR.     

Prolongation of PR interval is associated with endothelial dysfunction and activation of vascular repair in high-risk cardiovascular patients

Purpose

Epidemiological studies showed that PR prolongation is associated with increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. We investigated the relations of PR interval with indices of vascular function and endothelial repair as the underlying mechanisms.

Methods

The study comprised 348 high-risk patients with prior coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, and/or diabetes mellitus recruited from medical outpatient clinics and 150 healthy subjects without such a history. PR interval was considered prolonged if >200 ms, as determined from resting 12-lead electrocardiogram. Vascular function was assessed by brachial flow-meditated dilatation (FMD) using high-resolution ultrasound. Circulating CD133⁺/KDR⁺ endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) levels were measured by flow cytometry.

Results

Among healthy subjects, PR interval was inversely associated with FMD (R?=??0.20, P?=?0.015), but not with the level of circulating CD133⁺/KDR⁺ EPC (R?=?0.05, P?=?0.58). Among high-risk cardiovascular patients, PR prolongation >200 ms was more common compared with healthy subjects (45/348 (13 %) versus 4/150 (3 %), P?<?0.001). PR interval was associated inversely with FMD (R?=??0.14, P?=?0.01) and positively with circulating CD133⁺/KDR⁺ EPC level (R?=?+0.14, P?=?0.009). Circulating CD133⁺/KDR⁺ EPC level was significantly increased in patients with PR prolongation >200 ms (0.87?±?0.37 versus 0.68?±?0.42 (log, ×10^?3/ml), P?=?0.005). Adjusted for potential confounders, increased PR interval remained independently associated with increased CD133⁺/KDR⁺ EPC by +0.002 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.000 to 0.004 (log, ×10^?3/ml), P?=?0.011) and depressed FMD (B?=??0.014 %, 95 % CI ?0.027 to ?0.002, P?=?0.026).

Conclusions

PR prolongation is associated with endothelial dysfunction and evidence of endothelial repair activation in patients with high cardiovascular risk.     

Clinical efficacy of abatacept in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to examine the treatment retention and efficacy of abatacept, the first member of a new class of biologic agents, in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients during clinical practice.

Methods

A retrospective multicenter study was conducted with patients who underwent abatacept therapy for 24 weeks (n = 143).

Results

Patients at baseline had a mean age of 63.5 years, a mean disease duration of 11.3 years, and a mean disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) of 4.5. Overall retention of abatacept treatment was 83.2 % at 24 weeks, when 46.2 % of patients achieved DAS28-defined low disease activity (LDA; DAS28 <3.2) and 26.6 % achieved DAS28-defined remission (DAS28 <2.6). LDA was achieved in a significantly higher proportion of patients without prior biologics therapy compared to those with prior biologics (60.9 vs. 34.2 %, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference between patients with or without concomitant methotrexate (MTX) therapy (45.2 vs. 47.5 %).

Conclusions

Abatacept therapy appears to be highly effective and well tolerated during clinical treatment of RA. Abatacept was particularly effective in patients with no history of biologics use, and did not appear to be dependent on concomitant MTX therapy.