Further evidence for a central reorganisation of synaptic connectivity in patients with hypoglossal-facial anastomosis in man

In normal subjects, electrical stimulation of trigeminal mucosal afferents (lingual nerve - V3) can elicit a short latency (12.5+/-0. 3 ms; mean+/-S.D.) reflex response in the ipsilateral genioglossus muscle (Maisonobe et al., Reflexes elicited from cutaneous and mucosal trigeminal afferents in normal human subjects. Brain Res. 1998;810:220-228). In the present study on patients with hypoglossal-facial (XII-VII) nerve anastomoses, we were able to record similar R1-type blink reflex responses in the orbicularis oculi muscles, following stimulation of either supraorbital nerve (V1) or lingual nerve (V3) afferents. However, these responses were not present in normal control subjects. Voluntary swallowing movements produced clear-cut facilitations of the R1 blink reflex response elicited by stimulation of V1 afferents. In a conditioning-test procedure with a variable inter-stimulus interval, the R1 blink reflex response elicited by supraorbital nerve stimulation was facilitated by an ipsilateral mucosal conditioning stimulus in the V3 region. This facilitatory effect was maximal when the two stimuli (conditioning and test) were applied simultaneously. This effect was not observed on the R1 component of the blink reflex in the normal control subjects. These data strongly suggest that in patients with XII-VII anastomoses, but not in normal subjects, both cutaneous (V1) and mucosal (V3) trigeminal afferents project onto the same interneurones in the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus. This clearly supports the idea that peripheral manipulation of the VIIth and the XIIth nerves induces a plastic change within this nucleus.     

Neurophysiological evaluation of trigeminal and facial nerves in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Cranial neuropathy is clinically uncommon in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), but there is little information on the neurophysiological examination of cranial nerve involvement. To determine the incidence of trigeminal and facial nerve involvement in patients with CIDP, the direct response of the orbicularis oculi muscle to percutaneous electric stimulation of the facial nerve and the blink reflex (induced by stimulation of the supraorbital nerve) were examined in 20 CIDP patients. The latency of the direct response was increased in 12 patients (60%) and an abnormal blink reflex was observed in 17 patients (85%). There was no correlation between electrophysiological findings and the latencies of the direct and R1 responses and disease duration or clinical grade in CIDP patients. Nevertheless, the prevalence of subclinical trigeminal and facial neuropathy is extremely high in patients with CIDP when examined by neurophysiological tests.     

Electrophysiological study of ephaptic axono-axonal responses in hemifacial spasm

One of the classic features of hemifacial spasm (HFS) is spread of the blink reflex responses to muscles other than the orbicularis oculi. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the generation of such abnormal responses include lateral spread of activity between neighboring fibers of the facial nerve and hyperexcitability of facial motoneurons. In this report we present evidence for another mechanism that can contribute to the generation of responses in lower facial muscles resembling the R1 response of the blink reflex. In 13 HFS patients, we studied the responses induced in orbicularis oris by electrical stimuli applied at various sites between the supraorbital and zygomatic areas. We identified responses with two different components: an early and very stable component, with an onset latency ranging from 10.5 to 14.8 ms, and a more irregular longer-latency component. Displacement of the stimulation site away from the supraorbital nerve and towards the extracranial origin of the facial nerve caused a progressive shortening of response latency. These features indicate that, in our patients, the shortest latency component of the orbicularis oris response was likely generated by antidromic conduction in facial nerve motor axons followed by axono-axonal activation of the fibers innervating the lower facial muscles. Our results suggest that motor axono-axonal responses are generated by stimulation of facial nerve terminals in HFS.     

Electrophysiological evidence for crossed oligosynaptic trigemino-facial connections in normal man.

A crossed short latency component (R1) of the human blink reflex could be elicited in orbicularis oculi muscles to stimulation of the contralateral supraorbital nerve, when infraliminal conditioning stimuli were applied to various cutaneous afferents of the body (facial, upper and lower limbs). The crossed R1 responses appeared when the time interval between the conditioning and the test stimuli was of 30 to 40 ms, 50 to 65 ms and 95 to 110 ms for facial, upper and lower limbs afferents respectively. For the same time intervals, these conditioning volleys also exerted a facilitatory effect on the ipsilateral R1 responses. Furthermore, crossed R1 responses were also obtained during supraspinal facilitation induced by a voluntary contraction of the eyelids. These data show that crossed oligosynaptic trigemino-facial reflex connections exist in normal subjects, which become functional when adequate conditioning stimuli are available.     

Orbicularis oculi responses to stimulation of nerve afferents from upper and lower limbs in normal humans

A brief mechanical or electrical stimulus to peripheral nerve afferents from the upper and lower limbs elicited a small and inconsistent EMG response of the orbicularis oculi muscles. This response was facilitated when the stimuli were delivered at fixed leading time intervals, of 45–300 ms, with respect to a supraorbital nerve electrical stimulus. Also, the peripheral nerve stimulus modified the conventional blink reflex responses, inducing facilitation of R1 and inhibition of R2. These results suggest a complex processing of sensory inputs from the face and the limbs at the brainstem, where they are probably integrated in a network of interneurons influencing the excitability of facial motoneurons.     

Unmasking of the trigemino-accessory reflex in accessory facial anastomosis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possible blink reflex responses in facial muscles reinnervated by the accessory nerve. METHOD: Eleven patients with a complete facial palsy were submitted to a surgical repair by an accessory facial nerve anastomosis (AFA). In this pathological group, blink reflex was studied by means of percutaneous electrical stimulation of the supraorbital nerve and recording from the orbicularis oculi muscle. A control group comprised seven normal people and seven patients with a complete Bell's facial palsy; in this group, responses on the sternocleidomastoideus (SCM) muscles were studied after supraorbital nerve stimulation. RESULTS: All the patients with AFA showed a consistent degree of facial reinnervation. Ten out of the 11 patients with AFA showed reflex responses; in six, responses were configured by a double component pattern, resembling the R1 and R2 components of the blink reflex; three patients had an R1-like response and one patient showed a unique R2 component. Mean values of latencies were 15.2 (SD 4.6) ms for the R1 and 85.3 (SD 9.6) ms for the R2. In the control group, eight out of 14 people had evidence of reflex responses in the SCM muscles; these were almost exclusively configured by a bilateral late component (mean latency 63.5 (SD15.9) ms) and only one of the subjects showed an early response at 11 ms. CONCLUSION: The trigemino-accessory reflex response in the pathological group was more complex and of a significantly higher incidence than in the control group. These differences could be tentatively explained by a mechanism of synaptic plasticity induced by the impairment of the efferent portion of the reflex. This could unmask the central linking between the trigeminal and the accessory limbs of the reflex. The findings described could be a demonstration of neurobionomic function in the repairing process of the nervous system.     

Anatomical observation on the afferent projections to the retractor bulbi motoneuronal cell group and other pathways possibly related to the blink reflex in the cat

In the cat the retractor bulbi (RB) muscle reflexively retracts the eye ball into the orbit. This reflex action is called the nictitating membrane response which, together with the reflex contraction of the orbicularis oculi muscle, constitutes the blink reflex. The retractor bulbi (RB) motoneuronal nucleus is a small cell group located in the lateral tegmentum of the caudal pons, just dorsal to the superior olivary complex. The nucleus is identical to the accessory abducens nucleus and sends its fibers through the abducens nerve. Autoradiographical tracing results indicate that the RB nucleus receives some fibers from the principal and rostral spinal trigeminal nuclei and from the dorsal red nucleus and dorsally adoining tegmentum. The same areas project to the intermediate facial subnucleus, containing motoneurons innervating the orbicularis oculi muscle. It is suggested that the trigeminal projections take part in the anatomical framework for the R1 component of the blink reflex. Two other brainstem areas i.e.: a portion of the caudal pontine ventrolateral tegmental field and the medullary media tegmentum at the level of the hypoglossal nucleus were also found to project to the RB motoneuronal cell group and to the intermediate facial subnucleus. These projections were much stronger than those derived from the trigeminal nuclei and red nucleus. Moreover, the medullary premotor area projects not only to the blink motoneuronal cell groups but also to the pontine premotor area. It is suggested that both areas are involved in the R2 blink reflex component. The medullary blink premotor area receives afferents especially from oculomotor control structures in the reticular formation of the brainstem while the pontine blink premotor area receives afferents from the olivary pretectal nucleus and/or the nucleus of the optic tract and from the dorsal red nucleus and its dorsally adjoining area. Because the oculomotor control structures in the reticular formation (by way of the superior colliculus) and the red nucleus receive afferents from trigeminal nuclei, they may play an important role in tactually induced reflex blinking, while the pretectum could take part in the neuronal framework of the visually induced blink reflex.     

Blink reflex in patients with hemifacial spasm. Observations during microvascular decompression operations

The blink reflex cannot normally be elicited during surgical anesthesia using inhalation anesthetics. However, in patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS) the early component of the reflex response (R1) can be elicited on the affected side but not on the unaffected side during such anesthesia. The electromyographic (EMG) response from the mentalis muscle to stimulation of the supraorbital nerve was recorded during microvascular decompression (MVD) of the facial nerve to relieve HFS and compared to the response from the same muscle to stimulation of the zygomatic branch of the facial nerve in four patients. During the operation before the facial nerve was decompressed, contractions in both the orbicularis oculi and the mentalis muscles could be elicited by stimulation of the supraorbital nerve (mean latencies 12.2 +/- 1.9 and 12.9 +/- 2.0 ms, respectively). When the facial nerve had been decompressed the blink reflex could no longer be elicited, and there was no response from the mentalis muscle to stimulation of the zygomatic branch of the facial nerve. Compound action potentials (CAP) recorded from the 7th cranial nerve in response to stimulation of the supraorbital nerve had latencies of 7.5 ms +/- 1.4 ms to the negative peak.     

Anatomical observations on the afferent projections to the retractor bulbi motoneuronal cell group and other pathways possibly related to the blink reflex in the cat

In the cat retractor bulbi (RB) muscle reflexively retracts the eye ball into the orbit. This reflex action is called the nictitating membrane response which, together with the reflex contraction of the orbicularis oculi muscle, constitutes the blink reflex. The retractor bulbi (RB) motoneuronal nucleus is a small cell group located in the lateral tegmentum of the caudal pons, just dorsal to the superior olivary complex. The nucleus is identical to the accessory abducens nucleus and sends its fibers through the abducens nerve. Autoradiographical tracing results indicate that the RB nucleus receives some fibers from the principal and rostral spinal trigeminal nuclei and from the dorsal red nucleus and dorsally adjoining tegmentum. The same areas project to the intermediate facial subnucleus, containing motoneurons innervating the orbicularis oculi muscle. It is suggested that the trigeminal projections take part in the anatomical framework for the R1 component of the blink reflex. Two other brainstem areas i.e.: a portion of the caudal pontine ventrolateral tegmental field and the medullary medial tegmentum at the level of the hypoglossal nucleus were also found to project to the RB motoneuronal cell group and to the intermediate facial subnucleus. These projections were much stronger than those derived from the trigeminal nuclei and red nucleus. Moreover, the medullary premotor area projects not only to the blink motoneuronal cell groups but also to the pontine premotor area. It is suggested that both areas are involved in the R2 blink reflex component. The medullary blink premotor area receives afferents especially from oculomotor control structures in the reticular formation of the brainstem while the pontine blink premotor area receives afferents from the olivary pretectal nucleus and/or the nucleus of the optic tract and from the dorsal red nucleus and its dorsally adjoining area. Because the oculomotor control structures in the reticular formation (by way of the superior colliculus) and the red nucleus receive afferents from trigeminal nuclei, they may play an important role in tactually induced reflex blinking, while the pretectum could take part in the neuronal framework of the visually induced blink reflex.     

The corneal reflex and the R2 component of the blink reflex

A reflex contraction of the human orbicularis oculi muscles can be evoked by stimulation of either the supraorbital region ("blink reflex") or the cornea ("corneal reflex"). We found that the latency of the corneal reflex was longer, and the duration was longer than the R2 component of the blink reflex. The absolute refractory period of the R2 component of the blink reflex was longer after supraorbital than after corneal conditioning stimulation. When the R2 component of the blink reflex was habituated by repetitive stimuli, stimulation of the cornea still evoked a reflex, but supraorbital stimulation produced only a depressed R2 response. These findings suggest that the two reflexes do not have identical neural connections.     

Redirection of the hypoglossal nerve to facial muscles alters central connectivity in human brainstem

Functional motor control requires perfect matching of central connectivity of motoneurones with their peripheral connections. However, it is not known to what extent central circuitry is influenced by target muscles, either during development or following a lesion. Surgical interventions aimed at restoring function following peripheral nerve lesions provide an opportunity for studying this interaction in the mature human nervous system. We have followed 8 patients in whom the hypoglossal nerve was anastomosed into a lesioned facial nerve, allowing voluntary contractions of the previously paralyzed muscles. We show that, in addition to replacing the facial neurons at peripheral synapses, a new short-latency trigemino-hypoglossal reflex, of the R1 blink reflex type, can be demonstrated in patients showing recovery, implying a sprouting of trigeminal neurons towards hypoglossal motoneurones, over a distance of at least 0.5 cm. These surprising results show an unexpected influence of the periphery in remodelling central connectivity in man.     

The relationship of eyelid movement to the blink reflex

Although the blink reflex is a standard neurophysiological investigation its relationship with eyelid movement has not been clearly established. We studied normal subjects and patients with unilateral facial paralysis to define the pattern of eyelid movement following glabellar tap, supraorbital nerve stimulation, facial nerve stimulation and direct corneal stimulation. We found that eyelid closure did not necessarily occur in a single movement. Following glabellar tap the first component of a two-stage movement was initiated by levator palpebrae relaxation while with supraorbital nerve stimulation orbicularis oculi contraction produced the first movement. The compound muscle action potential following direct facial nerve stimulation produced only minimal eyelid movement, the major closure being associated with a longer latency orbicularis oculi reflex. Corneal stimulation elicited a single component eyelid movement. Thus, the pattern of eyelid movement differed for each stimulus reflecting variations in orbicularis oculi contraction and levator palpebrae inhibition.     

Axon reflexes or ephaptic responses simulating blink reflex R1 after XII-VII nerve anastomosis

It has been claimed that functional recovery of the blink reflex occurs after hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis. This has been explained through central nervous system plasticity and reorganization of neuronal connections. In 5 patients with reinnervated facial muscles after hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis, we observed “R1-like” responses that fulfilled criteria for facial nerve axon reflexes or ephapses. First, displacement of the stimulating electrode from the supraorbital to the zygomatic area shortened the latency of the evoked response. Second, these responses were stable (jitter mean consecutive difference < 25 μs) and they had complex potential shapes unmodified by high-frequency stimulation. Finally, collision techniques demonstrated antidromic conduction of impulses in the facial nerve from supraorbital to zygomatic points. Therefore, these “R1-like” responses are not the early component of a functionally recovered blink reflex but motor axon reflexes or ephaptic responses similar to the short latency responses observed following facial nerve regeneration or from sutured nerves in human forearms. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Corneal reflex in normal and pathological subjects

The orbicularis oculi response can be evoked both by mechanical stimulation of the cornea (corneal reflex) and by electrical stimulation of the skin overlying the supraorbital nerve (blink reflex). Mechanical stimuli to the cornea activate A delta and C free nerve endings of the corneal mucosa. Electrical stimuli to the supraorbital nerve activate A beta, A delta and C fibers of the nerve trunk. Both reflexes present a bilateral late response, but the blink reflex shows in addition an early ipsilateral component (R1), which has never been observed with the corneal stimulation in man. We have developed a simple technique of electrical stimulation of the cornea which provides stable responses and allows precise measurements of threshold and latency of the reflex. In normal subjects, the threshold ranged from 50 to 350 microA, and the maximal stimulus that the subject could bear (tolerance level) ranged from 1000 to 2500 microA. The minimal latency to tolerance level stimuli was 39 +/- 3 msec. The latency difference between the direct responses evoked from the two opposite corneas never exceeded 8 msec and the difference between the direct and consensual responses elicited from the same cornea never exceeded 5 msec. An early ipsilateral component similar to the R1 response of the blink reflex was not observed, even with supramaximal stimulation. The electrically evoked corneal reflex was normal in 10 cases of essential trigeminal neuralgia, while the responses showed significant abnormalities in 18 subjects submitted to thermocoagulation of the Gasserian ganglion as a treatment of neuralgic pain, as well as in 2 cases of symptomatic neuralgia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Partial restoration of blink reflex function after spinal accessory-facial nerve anastomosis.

Functional motor control requires perfect matching of the central connections of motoneurons with their peripheral inputs. It is not known, however, to what extent these central circuits are influenced by target muscles, either during development or after a lesion. Surgical interventions aimed at restoring function after peripheral nerve lesions provide an opportunity for studying this interaction in the mature human nervous system. A patient was studied in whom the spinal accessory nerve was anastomosed into a lesioned facial nerve, allowing voluntary contractions of the previously paralysed muscles. This procedure, in addition to replacing the facial neurons at peripheral synapses, allowed a new short latency trigeminospinal accessory reflex of the R1 blink reflex type to be demonstrated, implying that trigeminal neurons had sprouted towards spinal accessory motoneurons over a distance of at least 1 cm. These results show an unexpected influence of the periphery in remodelling central connectivity in humans. The motoneuronal excitability for this R1 reflex response was therefore studied to compare the convergent properties of facial motoneurons (normal side) with those of the spinal accessory motoneurons (operated side) using a classic double shock technique with variable interstimulus intervals (conditioning test stimulus). On the normal side, conditioning stimuli (to the ipsilateral or contralateral infraliminar supraorbital nerve) produced a clearcut facilitation of the R1 blink reflex when the interstimulus interval was 30-80 ms. By contrast, a similar procedure had no effect on the R1 blink reflex mediated via the trigeminal-spinal accessory reflex arc. These data indicate that despite the heterotopic sprouting of some axons from neurons in the XIth nucleus, motoneurons involved in the newly formed reflex arc remain totally inexcitable by other trigeminal afferents and seem unable to ensure a physiological functioning of the normal blink reflex. Thus the functional relevance of the recovered R1 blink response remains unclear.     

Afferent projections to the orbicularis oculi motoneuronal cell group. An autoradiographical tracing study in the cat

The motoneurons innervating the orbicularis oculi muscle from a subgroup within the facial nucleus, called the intermediate facial subnucleus. This makes it possible to study afferents to these motoneurons by means of autoradiographical tracing techniques. Many different injections were made in the brainstem and diencephalon and the afferent projections to the intermediate facial subnucleus were studied. The results indicated that these afferents were derived from the following brainstem areas: the dorsal red nucleus and the mesencephalic tegmentum dorsal to it; the olivary pretectal nucleus and/or the nucleus of the optic tract; the dorsolateral pontine tegmentum (parabrachial nuclei and nucleus of K?lliker-Fuse) and principal trigeminal nucleus; the ventrolateral pontine tegmentum at the level of the motor trigeminal nucleus; the caudal medullary medial tegmentum; the lateral tegmentum at the level of the rostral pole of the hypoglossal nucleus and the ventral part of the trigeminal nucleus and the nucleus raphe pallidus and caudal raphe magnus including the adjoining medullary tegmentum. These latter projections probably belong to a general motoneuronal control system. The mesencephalic projections are mainly contralateral, the caudal pontine and upper medullary lateral tegmental projections are mainly ipsilateral and the caudal medullary projections are bilateral. It is suggested that the different afferent pathways subserve different functions of the orbicularis oculi motoneurons. Interneurons in the dorsolateral pontine and lateral medullary tegmentum may serve as relay for cortical and limbic influences on the orbicularis oculi musculature, while interneurons in the ventrolateral pontine and caudal medullary tegmentum may take part in the neuronal organization of the blink reflex.     

Cortical control of voluntary blinking: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate cortical regions related to voluntary blinking. METHODS: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the facial motor cortex (M1) and the midline frontal region (Fz) in 10 healthy subjects with eyes opened and closed. Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from the orbicularis oculi (OOC), orbicularis oris (OOR), abductor digiti minimi and tibialis anterior using surface and needle electromyography electrodes. Facial M waves and blink reflex were measured using supramaximal electrical stimulation of the facial and supraorbital nerves. RESULTS: TMS at Fz elicited 3 waves in OOC with no response in other tested muscles except for the early wave in OOR. Facial M1 stimulation produced only early and late waves. Because of their latencies, shapes, and relationship to coil position and stimulation intensity, early and late waves appeared to be analogous to the facial M wave and R1 component of the blink reflex. The intermediate wave at 6-8 ms latency was elicited in OOC by Fz stimulation with eyes closed. CONCLUSIONS: Since its latency matches the central conduction time of other cranial muscles and it has characteristic of muscle activation-related facilitation, the intermediate wave is presumably related to cortical stimulation. This result provides evidence that the cortical center for the upper facial movements, including blinking, is not principally located in the facial M1, but rather in the mesial frontal region.     

Pathway of the blink reflex in the brainstem of the cat: Interneurons between the trigeminal nuclei and the facial nucleus

Blink reflex responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the supraorbital nerve were examined using cats and the pathway of the blink reflex in the brainstem was elucidated. Both early response (ER) and late response (LR) were mediated by the main sensory trigeminal nucleus and the spinal trigeminal nucleus. However, a lesion of the main sensory trigeminal nucleus had less effect on the blink reflex than a lesion of the spinal trigeminal nucleus. The ER was mediated not only by the shorter disynaptic pathway of 3 neurons through the trigeminal nerve, the trigeminal nuclei and the facial nucleus but also by a polysynaptic pathway of 4 neurons. The interneurons were located between the trigeminal nuclei and the facial nucleus. Some of these interneurons participated in the production of both ER and LR. The area of the brainstem responsible for ER and LR of the blink reflex was the reticular formation from the rostral part of the medulla to the pons except the medial area around the median sulcus. The LR interneurons were distributed more widely than the ER interneurons.     

Long latency response of the mentalis muscle following transcranial magnetic stimulation with a circular coil in normal subjects

Short latency response (SLR), middle latency response and long latency response (LLR) are elicited in facial muscles by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Although it has been said that the LLRs are elicited by the trigeminal nerve stimulation, a trigeminofacial reflex is recorded easily in normal subjects by the electrical stimulation in orbicularis oculi muscles as a blind reflex, but a trigeminal-facial reflex recorded in orbicularis oris, namely a snout reflex, is more difficult to record in normal subjects. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the LLR of lower facial muscles (mentalis muscle) by the transcranial magnetic stimulation, using a circular coil. The transcranial magnetic stimulations were performed over parieto-occipital scalp with frequencies of random and 0.3 Hz in 11 normal subjects and the responses in the mentalis muscle were recorded. The LLR of the mentalis muscle was recorded in all 11 subjects following SLRs. The latency, duration and LLR/SLR ratio were 37.4 msec, 20.3 msec and 9.1%, respectively. The waveform of the LLR varied trial to trial showing habituation with a stimulation of 0.3 Hz. At this time the LLR of the masseter muscle was not recorded following this transmagnetic stimulation. It was suggested that the LLR of the mentalis muscle is recorded by the transcranial magnetic stimulation of the trigeminal nerve with a circular coil. The ease and reliability of their recording make it possible to apply this LLR clinically as well as a blink reflex.     

Orbicularis oculi and orbicularis oris reflexes in blepharospasm and torticollis spasmodica during spasm-free intervals

To investigate possible abnormalities of the blink reflex pathways, we analyzed the latencies and amplitudes of the blink reflex responses in the orbicularis oculi (Ooculi) muscle, following supraorbital nerve stimulation, in 19 patients with blepharospasm, 16 patients with torticollis spasmodica and 22 control subjects. Furthermore, in order to examine the suprasegmental control of the responses, the reflex responses were also evoked in the orbicularis oris (Ooris) muscle after stimulation of the ipsilateral supraorbital nerve. The responses were recorded only when subjects had no contractions of the eyelid muscles, either involuntarily, voluntarily or spontaneously; this could be controlled by a sound signal. The metrics of the reflex responses in the Ooculi and Ooris muscles in patient groups were comparable to those in controls. Our data indicate that the afferent and efferent pathways of the reflex arc and the suprasegmental control of the reflex are intact in patients with blepharospasm and torticollis spasmodica, at least during spasm-free intervals. Alterations of responses may occur during spasms due to either segmental or suprasegmental changes.