Renal transplantation in children with emphasis on young patients

We report the results of 41 consecutive renal transplantations performed on 39 children (median age 2.7 years). Twenty-six recipients were less than 5 years old. Twenty-one recipients (13 under the age of 5 years) received cadaver (CAD) grafts. All grafts except 2 were from adult donors and were placed extraperitoneally. Patients were on triple immunosuppression (cyclosporine plus azathioprine plus methylprednisolone). Mean followup time was 2.3 years. No vascular and only one ureteral complication was seen. Acute tubular necrosis occurred in 3 patients (7.3%). No grafts were lost due to acute rejection. Three-year patient survival and 1-year graft survival were 100%. The overall 3-year actuarial graft survival was 86%. Three-year survival of grafts from living-related donors (LRD) was 92% and that of CAD grafts 75%. In recipients younger than 5 years, 3-year LRD graft survival was 89% and CAD graft survival 73%. No significant differences in graft survival between recipients of different age groups or between LRD and CAD grafts were found. We conclude that results of renal transplantation in children under 5 years of age are comparable to those of older children, even using CAD grafts, when adult donors and triple immunosuppression are used.     

Renal Allograft Survival in Transplant Recipients with Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

Previous literature suggests that the recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) after renal transplantation is more common in recipients who have received an HLA-identical living-related (LRD) transplant. To address the question if FSGS patients can safely receive a 6-antigen match LRD kidney transplant, we analyzed death-censored renal allograft survival data of FSGS patients from the United States Renal Data System database (USRDS). Using the USRDS and the U.S. Scientific Renal Transplant Registry between the years 1988-97, we found 19259 adult primary renal transplant recipients, of which 2414 patients had FSGS as their primary diagnosis as compared to 16845 patients who had other types of glomerulonephritis (GN). A Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate death-censored graft survival among FSGS patients with a zero mismatch LRD kidney transplant. The model included a triple interaction term comparing FSGS vs. GN vs. living donation (LD) vs. cadaveric donation (CAD) vs. zero mismatch (six antigen or HLA-identical) vs. mismatch. Annually adjusted death censored graft loss rates per 1000 patients (ADGL) were calculated. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis patients receiving a zero mismatch LRD kidney transplant had the lowest ADGL rate, losing 10.5 grafts per 1000 patients per year. Not significantly different but higher (14.3) was the ADGL rate for LD, zero mismatch GN recipients. The ADGL rate was significantly higher in FSGS recipients who received a LD, mismatched transplant (36.5). Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis patients who received a CAD, zero mismatched graft (44.1), or CAD, mismatched graft (63.2), had significantly higher ADGL rates. Zero mismatch LRD kidney transplants are not a risk factor for graft loss in FSGS patients but are associated with significantly better death-censored graft survival as compared to CAD 6-antigen match or mismatched donations.     

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation and living related donor renal transplantation in patients with diabetes: is there a difference in survival?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and living related donor renal transplantation (LRD) in patients with diabetes. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: It remains unanswered whether diabetic patients with end-stage renal failure are better served by LRD or SPK. METHODS: Using a longitudinal database, data from all diabetic patients receiving LRD or cadaveric renal transplants or SPKs from January 1986 through January 1996 were analyzed. Patient and graft survival, early graft function, and the cause of patient and graft loss were compared for 43 HLA-identical LRDs, 87 haplotype-identical LRDs, 379 SPKs, and 296 cadaveric renal transplants. RESULTS: The demographic composition of the SPK and LRD groups were similar, but because of less strict selection criteria in the cadaveric transplant group, patients were 10 years older, more patients received dialysis, and patients had been receiving dialysis longer before transplantation. Patient survival was similar for the SPK and LRD groups but was significantly lower for the cadaveric renal transplant group. Similarly, there was no difference in graft survival between SPK and LRD recipients, but it was significantly lower for recipients in the cadaveric renal transplant group. Delayed graft function was significantly more common in the cadaveric renal transplant group. Discharge creatinine, the strongest predictor of patient and graft survival, was highest in the SPK group and lowest in the HLA-identical LRD group. The rate of rejection within the first year was greatest in SPK patients (77%), intermediate in the haplotype-identical LRD and cadaveric transplant groups (57% and 48%, respectively), and lowest (16%) in the HLA-identical LRD group. Cardiovascular disease was the primary cause of death for all groups. Acute rejection, chronic rejection, and death with a functioning graft were the predominant causes of graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that there was no difference in patient or graft survival in diabetic patients receiving LRD or SPK transplants. However, graft and patient survival rates in diabetic recipients of cadaveric renal transplants were significantly lower than in the other groups.     

The Role of Various Risk Factors in Living Related Donor Renal Transplant Success

Assessment of living related donor (LRD) survival statistics offers the opportunity to gauge the effects of recipient characteristics without the perturbations of viability, function, and antigen sharing that are inherent in cadaveric organ grafting. From January 1, 1969 to January 1, 1979, 167 LRD grafts were performed. Crude patient survival at one year is 92% and 84% at five years. Graft function at one year is 79%, and at five years it is 64%. One year patient survival has steadily improved: 1969-73: 83%, 1973-75: 91%, 1975-79: 98%. Graft survival improved during the first two periods and has since remained unchanged. HLA identical grafts showed the expected advantage compared with single haplotype grafts (93 vs 74%). Recipient age was without effect until 50 years, all younger subgroups having one-year patient survival of 92-95%, while those older than 50 had a one-year survival of 60%. Juvenile diabetes was associated with a one-year patient survival of 85% and graft survival of 74%. Glomerulonephritis did not affect early graft survival statistics, but there was a greater frequency of graft loss after 2.5 years, with function at five years of 51 versus 68% for recipients with all other diagnoses. Cadaveric graft statistics vary with recipient race when adjusted to exclude older patients and diabetics, white recipient one-year graft survival 74%, black 38%. No meaningful difference exists among LRD recipients as to graft function, but there is a trend toward improved black patient survival. This suggests that there is not an inherent difference in immune response to genetically similar grafts, but that the disparate results with racially mixed donor-recipient combinations rests with other factors.     

The effect of cyclosporine on early graft function in human renal transplantation

The effect of cyclosporine and steroids on early renal allograft function and eventual graft outcome was analyzed in 100 recipients; 33 recipients of living related donor (LRD) and 67 recipients of cadaveric donor (CAD) allografts were studied. A concurrent population of 47 CAD recipients treated with azathioprine and steroids was used for comparison. Recipients received oral cyclosporine (14 mg/kg) 48 hours (LRD) or 6-12 hours (CAD) pretransplant. No cases of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) were observed in the LRD recipients. The incidence of posttransplant ATN was similar in the cyclosporine-treated (41%) and in the azathioprine-treated (45%) CAD recipients (P = ns). Cyclosporine-treated CAD kidneys preserved less than 24 hr experienced a lower rate of ATN (P less than .01) using simple cold storage (31%), as compared with hypothermic pulsatile perfusion (57%). One-month creatinine nadirs were higher in cyclosporine-treated than in azathioprine-treated recipients, using median values for each group. One-year actuarial patient survival for cyclosporine-treated LRD recipients was 97%; CAD recipients, 94%, and azathioprine-treated CAD recipients, 91%. Graft survival rates in the same groups were 91%, 76%, and 55%, respectively. The major causes of graft loss in cyclosporine-treated patients were nonimmunologic. It is concluded that cyclosporine and prednisone are a safe, efficacious combination for LRD and CAD renal transplantation. The possibility of nephrotoxicity leading to impaired graft function in the early posttransplant period should not preclude the administration of cyclosporine prior to alloantigen presentation.     

Flow cytometry-detected IgG is not a contraindication to renal transplantation: IgM may be beneficial to outcome

BACKGROUND: At our transplant center, primary recipients of either a haplo-identical (haplo-ID) living related (LRD) or a cadaveric (CAD) donor renal allograft are transplanted after a negative donor-specific IgG anti-human globulin (AHG) cross-match (XM). Testing included the historically highest panel-reactive antibody and the immediate (0-7 days) pretransplant sera. A positive donor specific IgM-AHG XM has not been a contraindication to transplant. Reports suggest that donor-specific flow cytometry cross-matches (FCXM) may be more clinically informative than the AHG-XM. METHODS: We therefore evaluated the impact of a positive FCXM (IgG or IgM) on the rejection frequency (0-12 months after transplant) and 1-year graft survival for cyclosporine-prednisone-treated primary (haplo-ID and CAD) renal allograft recipients. All transplants were performed after a negative donor-specific IgG AHG-XM regardless of the IgM-AHG XM status. RESULTS: Rejection frequencies (26% vs. 31%, P = NS) and 1-year graft survivals (92% vs. 89%, P = NS) were comparable for haplo-ID LRD FCXM-negative and IgG-FCXM-positive recipients. However, IgM-FCXM-positive LRD recipients experienced significantly fewer rejections (13% vs. 26% P<0.02) and an improved 1-year graft survival (100% vs. 92%, P<0.02) than FCXM-negative LRD recipients. Similar results were observed for primary CAD recipients. Rejection frequencies (40% vs. 44%, P = NS) and 1-year graft survivals (83% vs. 81%, P = NS) were comparable for primary CAD FCXM-negative and IgG-FCXM-positive recipients. Again, IgM-FCXM-positive primary CAD recipients experienced significantly fewer rejections (22% vs. 40%, P<0.02) and improved 1-year graft survivals (89% vs. 83%, P<0.05) than FCXM-negative recipients. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that, after a negative donor-specific IgG-AHG XM, an IgG-positive FCXM is not a contraindication to transplantation. The presence of IgM may be beneficial in reducing the occurrence of rejection episodes and improving graft survivals.     

Comparable renal graft survival in African-American and Caucasian recipients

In past years, many pediatric transplant centers found African-American renal transplant recipients to have poor graft survival. Since 1991 anti-lymphocyte induction therapy has been routinely used for pediatric cadaveric (CAD) and living-related donor (LRD) renal allograft recipients at the University of Tennessee, Memphis. Sixteen African-American first renal allograft recipients received induction therapy: 11 CAD allografts (10 OKT3, 1 ATGAM) and five LRD (all ATGAM). Sixteen Caucasian recipients received induction therapy; 3 CAD (all OKT3), 1 living-unrelated donor (OKT3), and 12 LRD (9 ATGAM, 3 OKT3). Mean age at renal transplantation was 11.8 and 10.5 years for African-American and Caucasian recipients, respectively. Predicted graft survival (PGS) estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method for the African-American patients was 94% at both 1 and 3 years, and for Caucasian patients was 94% and 85% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Eleven African-American CAD recipients had a PGS of 91% at 1 and 3 years. Renal allograft survival for African-American and Caucasian pediatric recipients at our center appears to be comparable. This could be due, in part, to the use of anti-lymphocyte induction therapy. However, other factors, such as improved compliance or better immunological and pharmacological monitoring, may also have contributed. Received April 18, 1997; received in revised form January 14, 1998; accepted January 19, 1998     

Ten-year experience with cyclosporine as primary immunosuppression in recipients of renal allografts.

Cyclosporine has been used as primary immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients in our unit for the past decade. The overall clinical experience and long-term effects of the agent are reviewed. There were 461 consecutive recipients of kidney grafts; 379 received grafts from cadaver donors (CAD) and 82 from living related donors (LRD). Four separate clinical protocols were used sequentially using progressively decreasing doses of CyA; azathioprine was added in group 4 recipients of LRD grafts, and in patients receiving secondary CAD grafts (group 5). The patient mortality rate was less than 5%, with sepsis being the prime contributor. The majority of kidney grafts were lost within the first 2 months after operation; those that never functioned were found almost invariably to have been irreversibly rejected. During the subsequent years of follow-up, attrition of CAD grafts was significantly greater than LRD grafts. In contrast, the attrition rate of primary and secondary CAD grafts was the same after the first 3 months, emphasizing the importance of early immunologic graft destruction. Primary nonfunction occurred in 49% of CAD kidneys and 17% of LRD grafts; however 71% of initially nonfunctioning LRD grafts never functioned at all compared to 34% of CAD grafts, the majority of such organs undergoing fulminate rejection. Individual graft loss after 1 year was almost inevitably due to chronic rejection; there were no differences in long-term allograft function among the treatment groups. Although CyA has improved overall results of kidney transplantation, chronic rejection remains a major unresolved problem.     

Kidney transplantation in primary oxalosis: data from the EDTA Registry

This paper reports the results of 98 first kidney transplantations in patients with oxalosis as the primary renal disease as recorded by the EDTA Registry. There were 79 patients who received a cadaveric (CAD) graft and 15 patients with a living related donor (LRD) graft; the type of donor was not recorded for four patients. Initial graft survival appeared to be better after LRD as compared to CAD grafts but at 3 years the poor survival was similar with 23% for LRD and 17% for CAD grafts. CAD graft survival did not differ between children and adults and was not affected by the waiting time on dialysis. A slight improvement was observed in grafts performed in the years 1983-1986 as compared to grafts performed in earlier years. The causes of failure reported were mainly rejection (33%) and recurrence of primary renal disease (31%). In view of the poor results related to recurrence of oxalosis in the graft, the potential of combined kidney and liver transplantation is discussed.     

Pediatric renal transplantation from related living donor

Living related donor (LRD) provides significant advantages when compared with cadaveric donor (CAD) in term of improved patient and graft survival and shorten waiting time. From 1985, 176 kidney transplants were performed at our Center. Of these, 156 (89%) were from CAD and 20 (11%) were from LRD, first degree. The purpose of this paper is to show our experience at 5 years with use of LRD. All donors underwent standardized metabolic workup, angiography assessed and renal function test. Twelve children received their first transplant and 8 were retransplant (6-second, 1-third and 1-fourth). Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of globulin antithymocyte, azathioprine, cyclosporine and prednisolone, using FK506 and mycophenolate mofetil in some of them. Four kidneys with multiple renal arteries were reconstructed ex vivo with microsurgical technique before transplantation. The most significant morbidity was due to FK506-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) with graft lost. All patients (donor and recipient) survived. Five years graft survival rate is 95% and mean glomerular filtration rate is 81.33 ml/min/1.73 m2.     

Paediatric kidney transplantation in small children – a single centre experience

Kidney transplantation (KTx) remains a challenging procedure in small children. This study presents our centre results. From 1983 to 2004, 40 of 442 paediatric KTx were performed in children with a body weight <11 kg. Median body weight was 9.2 kg (range: 7.2-10.9), median age was 2.7 years (range: 0.9-5.9). Preoperative dialysis was performed in 87.5%. In 24 cases (60%) grafts came from cadaveric (CAD) and in 16 cases (40%) from living related donors (LRD). Median donor age of CAD was 8 years (range: 1-40). The overall 1-, 5-, 10-, 15-year patient survival was 93%, 90%, 90% and 87% respectively. The overall 1-, 5-, 10-, 15-year graft survival was 90%, 80%, 66% and 56% respectively. There was no significant difference in survival of CAD or LRD grafts. Median follow-up was 13.7 years. Initial graft function rate was 100% for LRD and 79% for CAD. The relative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) showed no statistical difference between CAD and LRD. Main reasons for graft loss were chronic transplant nephropathy. Paediatric KTx is the treatment of choice even in very small children. Living donor KTx is the preferable donor source in terms of primary graft function and timing to transplantation.     

Kidney transplant in children weighing less than 15 kg: donor selection and technical considerations

BACKGROUND: Small children represent a challenging patient group in kidney transplantation (KTx). The aim of this study was to analyze patient and donor data influencing outcome in children that weighed <15 kg. METHODS: Sixty-eight kidneys were transplanted in 64 children that weighed <15 kg. In 44 cases, kidneys came from cadaveric donors (CAD) and in 24 cases from living-related donors (LRD). Grafts were placed transperitoneally via midline incision (n=16) or extraperitoneally to the iliac fossa (n=52). Vascular anastomoses were routinely performed to the aorta and vena cava even when the extraperitoneal approach was used. RESULTS: Vascular thrombosis was observed in two (3%), urinary leaks in five (7%), and stenosis in four (6%) patients. In six children receiving organs from adults to the iliac fossa, wound closure was performed using an absorbable mesh to avoid organ compression. Initial graft function occurred in 60 cases (88%). Frequency of initial graft function was significantly higher after KTx from LRD (100%) compared with CAD (82%). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival was 93%, 91%, and 91%, respectively, and the 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival was 92%, 85%, and 85%, respectively. There was no significant difference in patient and graft survival when KTx from LRD and CAD were compared. Within the CAD group, graft survival was improved using kidneys from donors >12 years compared with younger donors. CONCLUSION: Despite size discrepancy between recipients and grafts, KTx is feasible in children that weigh <15 kg by using an improved surgical technique even when adult organs are placed to the iliac fossa.     

The impact of cytomegalovirus infection on seronegative recipients of seropositive donor kidneys versus seropositive recipients treated with cyclosporine-prednisone immunosuppression

To assess the impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in D+R- patients treated with cyclosporine (CsA)-prednisone immunosuppression, we compared the incidence of CMV infection, severity of disease, and the 1, 2, and 3-year actual graft and patient survival rates of CMV-infected D+R- patients with R+ patients from a group of 516 renal allograft recipients at our center. CMV infection occurred more frequently in 27/56 D+R- patients (48%) versus 111/376 R+ patients (29%) (P less than 0.01). The incidence of CMV was also significantly greater in D+R- versus R- patients receiving CAD grafts (59% vs. 32%, P less than 0.01) and first transplants (47% vs. 30%, P less than 0.05). There were no significant differences in CMV disease severity between the aggregate D+R- and R+ patient groups and when subgroups of these patients receiving cadaveric donor (CAD), living-related donor (LRD), first, or retransplant allografts were compared. The actual 1, 2, and 3-year graft survival rates for D+R- patients (68%, 58%, 68%) were not significantly different from rates in R+ patients (83%, 77%, 63%) with CMV infection. When the 1, 2, and 3-year actual graft survival rates in subgroups of D+R- and R+ patients were compared in CAD, LRD, and first and retransplants, there were no significant differences. The actual 1, 2, and 3-year patient survival rates were not significantly different between D+R- (89%, 92%, 100%) and R+ patients (94%, 91%, 86%) with CMV infection, nor were they different when CMV infected D+R- and R+ patients with CAD, LRD, first or retransplant grafts were compared. These data do not support the policy of denying a seropositive kidney to a seronegative recipient, since the severity of CMV disease and the impact of CMV infection is not significantly different comparing D+R- and R+ patients receiving CsA-prednisone immunosuppression.     

The adverse impact of cytomegalovirus infection on clinical outcome in cyclosporine-prednisone treated renal allograft recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was diagnosed in 28% (n = 144) of 516 renal allograft recipients treated with cyclosporine-prednisone (CsA-Pred) immunosuppressive therapy. The majority of infections produced either asymptomatic (n = 37) or mild-to-moderate (n = 75) clinical disease, while 10% were lethal (n = 14). Transplantation from a seropositive donor to a seronegative recipient was associated with an increased incidence of (CMV) infection but did not predispose to more severe clinical disease. Similarly, donor source (cadaver [CAD] vs. living-related donor [LRD]), age greater than or equal to 45 years, and antecedent pulse steroid therapy for the treatment of acute rejection were not correlated with clinically more severe disease. An increase in serum creatinine to greater than or equal to 25% of preinfection nadir values occurred in association with CMV infection in 106 patients, returning to nadir values or below in 74.5% of these individuals. CMV infection did not impact on actual patient survival among recipients of LRD or CAD allografts or on actual 1-year HLA-haploidentical or HLA-identical LRD graft survival. In contrast, actual 1-year cadaveric graft survival was significantly lower among CMV-infected (n = 95) vs. uninfected (n = 198) patients (75.8% vs. 87.8%, P = .01). In association with the finding of reduced actual 1-year CAD graft survival, CMV-infected patients were found to be more predisposed to develop acute rejection episodes. Of the CMV-infected CAD graft recipients, 48.4% developed greater than or equal to 1 acute rejection episode during the first year following transplantation vs. 25.3% of their uninfected counterparts (P less than .001). The impact of CMV infection in CsA-Pred treated renal transplant recipients does not differ substantially from that reported historically in association with prednisone-azathioprine immunosuppressive therapy.     

Factors predicting the long-term success of maintenance cyclosporine monotherapy after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: The theoretical aim of maintenance cyclosporine monotherapy (mCsA) after kidney transplantation is to reduce the incidence of the metabolic complications of corticosteroids and to minimize the adverse effects of excessive long-term immunosuppression. This study was performed in low-immunological-risk cadaveric kidney transplant recipients to evaluate the risks and benefits of mCsA and the long-term graft survival, and to determine the factors predicting success of this policy. METHODS: The multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 329 Caucasian patients receiving mCsA out of 728 first cadaveric kidney transplant recipients. The inclusion criteria were: HLA antibodies < or =25%, serum creatinine <200 micromol/L, and no rejection or only one rejection episode. At the end of the study, we compared the group of patients successfully treated with mCsA (successful group) with those requiring additional immunosuppressive agents (unsuccessful mCsA group). RESULTS: Overall patient and graft survival rates for the 728 first cadaveric graft were 92% and 64%, respectively, at 8 years. Out of 329 patients enrolled in mCsA, 240 were maintained on this treatment and 89 were withdrawn (3 deaths, 18 graft losses, 68 functional grafts). The 8-year graft survival in the 329 enrolled mCsA patients was 84%, 95% in the successful mCsA group, and 70% in the unsuccessful mCsA group. Multivariate analysis showed that the factors predicting success of mCsA were: donor age <40 years (P = 0.001), serum creatinine at mCsA initiation <125 micromol/L (P = 0.02), no rejection episode before mCsA initiation (P = 0.005), and glomerulopathy as the primary renal disease (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Numerous kidney transplant recipients with a low immunological risk and good and stable renal function may benefit from discontinuation of prednisone and azathioprine in order to reduce the complications related to these drugs. This therapeutic approach had no adverse impact on the overall long-term graft survival for "low risk" and successful patients.     

The association of living donor source with patient and graft survival among kidney transplant recipients in the ERA-EDTA Registry – a retrospective study

In this study we aimed to compare patient and graft survival of kidney transplant recipients who received a kidney from a living-related donor (LRD) or living-unrelated donor (LUD). Adult patients in the ERA-EDTA Registry who received their first kidney transplant in 1998–2017 were included. Ten-year patient and graft survival were compared between LRD and LUD transplants using Cox regression analysis. In total, 14 370 patients received a kidney from a living donor. Of those, 9212 (64.1%) grafts were from a LRD, 5063 (35.2%) from a LUD and for 95 (0.7%), the donor type was unknown. Unadjusted five-year risks of death and graft failure (including death as event) were lower for LRD transplants than for LUD grafts: 4.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.7–4.6) and 10.8% (95% CI: 10.1–11.5) versus 6.5% (95% CI: 5.7–7.4) and 12.2% (95% CI: 11.2–13.3), respectively. However, after adjusting for potential confounders, associations disappeared with hazard ratios of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.87–1.13) for patient survival and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.94–1.14) for graft survival. Unadjusted risk of death-censored graft failure was similar, but after adjustment, it was higher for LUD transplants (1.19; 95% CI: 1.04–1.35). In conclusion, patient and graft survival of LRD and LUD kidney transplant recipients was similar, whereas death-censored graft failure was higher in LUD. These findings confirm the importance of both living kidney donor types.     

Causes of graft loss beyond two years in the cyclosporine era

While CsA has improved renal-allograft survival rates in the first 2 years compared with Aza, Terasaki's multicenter study (1) failed to show any difference in long-term graft survival in CsA-Pred versus Aza-Pred-treated recipients. The present study examines the long-term graft-survival rates at a single center using CsA immunosuppression and seeks to discern the causes of 58 graft losses among 343 patients with functioning grafts beyond 2 years posttransplantation. The 6-year primary and cadaveric actuarial graft survival at this institution is 59% with a graft half-life of 10 years, which is better than the 40% and 7.7 years, respectively, reported by Terasaki (1) for primary cadaveric recipients on Aza-Pred. It is also better than the 41%, 6-year survival and 5.5-year half-life for primary cadaveric recipients treated with CsA-Pred as reported in the multicenter study. (1) Less experience with the use of CsA may explain the latter comparison. Primary LRD grafts at this institution (2/3 haploidentical) have a 6-year actuarial survival of 77% and a half-life very closely approximating that of HLA-identical LRD grafts under Aza (23.4 years). These results demonstrate that CsA mitigates the effects of HLA incompatibility to reduce graft survival. The most common cause of graft loss beyond 2 years was chronic rejection (36.2%) followed by noncompliance (27.6%). Patient deaths resulted in 13 of the 58 graft losses; most of the deaths were related to cardiovascular diseases. Only 3 patients died from causes that could be attributed to CsA immunosuppression; 2 from sepsis and 1 from viral hepatitis. Acute rejection caused 8.6% of the graft losses on continuous CsA therapy. When immunologic risk factors were analyzed, the entire graft-loss group had a significantly higher proportion of retransplant patients than the graft-survival group (P less than 0.005), suggesting that prior transplantation imposes a higher risk for graft loss not only acutely but long term as well. However, retransplanted patients were significantly less likely to lose their grafts because of noncompliance (P less than 0.005). Male patients were found to be significantly more noncompliant.     

Graft thrombosis in pediatric renal transplant recipients. A report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study

Data from the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study were analyzed to determine the incidence and possible causes of graft thrombosis in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Between January 1987, and November 1989, 1045 renal transplants in recipients less than 18 years of age were registered in the study, including 484 living-related donor and 561 cadaver donor transplants. There were 213 graft failures (67 LRD, 146 CAD), and of these 27 were caused by thrombosis (8 LRD, 19 CAD). Thrombosis occurred in 2.6% of all transplants and accounted for 22.5% (27/120) of all graft failures that occurred in the first 60 days following transplantation. Among the LRD recipients, there were 24 graft failures in those less than 6 years of age, and 7 of these were due to thrombosis, compared to 1 thrombosis in 43 graft losses in recipients greater than 6 years (P less than 0.01). In recipients less than 6 years old, the thrombosis rate for those who received transplants without prior dialysis was 4/32 (12.5%) versus 3/109 (2.8%) with prior dialysis. Among the CAD recipients, age of the recipient did not influence graft thrombosis. Donor age, however, was strongly associated with the risk of thrombosis, as was cold storage time. Donor age and cold storage time were not independently distributed within the population, with longer cold storage times required for younger donors. Both factors, however, independently affected outcome. Other factors, including prior nephrectomy, prior transplant, center size, and use of cyclosporine were not associated with increased risk of thrombosis in LRD or CAD recipients. We conclude that graft thrombosis is an important cause of renal graft loss in children. In LRD transplants the risk of graft thrombosis is increased in recipients less than 6 years old, and preliminary data suggest that the lack of prior dialysis may be associated with thrombotic risk in these patients. CAD transplant recipients who receive grafts from young donors, particularly those with long cold storage time, are at increased risk for graft failure due to thrombosis.     

Graft function 5-7 years after renal transplantation in early childhood

BACKGROUND: Low recipient age is still a risk factor for graft failure after kidney transplantation (Tx). Detailed prospective reports on long-term graft function in small children after renal Tx are still lacking. METHODS: Forty-nine kidney allograft recipients who received transplants before the age of 5 years were followed prospectively. The most common disease was congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type. Twenty patients were recipients of living related donors (LRD), and 29 were cadaveric kidney (CAD) recipients. All patients received triple immunosuppression. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), sodium, urate, and potassium handling, and concentrating capacity were studied for up to 7 years after Tx. RESULTS: Patient survival 7 years after Tx was 100% for LRD and 96% for CAD recipients. Graft survival was 94% for LRD and 79% for CAD recipients (P=NS) and 89% and 83% for children >2 years and <2 years of age at Tx, respectively (P=NS). Five years after Tx, GFR was 70 vs. 64 and ERPF was 380 vs. 310 ml/min/1.73 m2 for LRD and CAD recipients, respectively (P=NS). Mean absolute GFR remained stable. GFR was lower in children who received transplants at <2 years than in children who received transplants at >2 years of age, 54 vs. 75 ml/min/1.73 m2 (P=0.02). Sodium handling remained intact, but hyperuricemia was seen in 43-67%; 17-33% showed abnormal handling of potassium; and most patients had a subnormal concentrating capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent long-term graft survival and good graft function can be achieved with triple immunosuppression, even in young CAD kidney recipients.     

A single institution, randomized, prospective trial of cyclosporin versus azathioprine-antilymphocyte globulin for immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients.

Between September 26, 1980 and December 31, 1983, 230 splenectomized, transfused renal allograft recipients were randomized to treatment with either cyclosporin-prednisone (N = 121, 68 diabetic and 53 nondiabetic recipients; 73 cadaver and 48 related donor grafts) or azathioprine-prednisone-antilymphocyte globulin (N = 109, 61 diabetic and 48 nondiabetic recipients; 69 cadaver and 40 related donor grafts). The results were analyzed on March 31, 1984. Actuarial patient survival rates at 2 years were 88% in the cyclosporin and 91% in the azathioprine groups (p = 0.649). Graft survival rates at 2 years were 82% in all cyclosporin and 77% in all azathioprine-treated recipients (p = 0.150); the corresponding figures in the recipients of related donor grafts were 87% vs. 83% (p = 0.656), and in the recipients of cadaver donor grafts were 78% vs. 73% (p = 0.178). The 2-year graft survival rates were 81% in cyclosporin and 74% in azathioprine-treated diabetic recipients (p = 0.150) and 83% in cyclosporin and 81% in azathioprine-treated nondiabetic recipients (p = 0.604). Within the cyclosporin and azathioprine treatment groups, the differences in graft survival rates between diabetic and nondiabetic recipients were not significant (p = 0.822 and 0.423, respectively). Although there were no significant differences in graft survival rates, the cumulative incidence of rejection episodes within the first post-transplant year was significantly lower in the cyclosporin (34%) than in the azathioprine (60%) treated recipients (p = 0.001). In recipients of technically successful cadaver kidney grafts, the incidence of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) was 31% in cyclosporin and 30% in azathioprine-treated recipients (p = 0.822). Graft survival rates in azathioprine- and cyclosporin-treated recipients who did or did not undergo ATN were 72% vs. 89% (p = 0.011). The mean (+/- S.D.) serum creatinine levels (mg/dl) at 1 year were higher in cyclosporin (2.0 +/- 0.6) than in azathioprine (1.5 +/- 0.5) treated recipients (p = less than 0.001). A reduction in cyclosporin dose because of nephrotoxicity was required in 96 of the cyclosporin-treated patients (70%), and 25 were switched to treatment with azathioprine (21%). The incidence of all infections in cyclosporin-treated patients was approximately half of that in azathioprine-treated patients, and only nine per cent of the cyclosporin-treated patients were diagnosed to have cytomegalovirus infections during the first post-transplant year vs. 28% in azathioprine-treated patients (p = 0.002).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)