Predictive modelling in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC)

Because the evidence is not yet solid enough to strongly recommend whether or not to treat hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients at certain stages of the disease, predictive models might help in decision making. The importance of prognostic models lies in their ability to capture clinically relevant and measurable variables for routine use by clinicians to inform patients, and improve palliation and treatment decisions. Basically this allows for the creation of homogeneous prognostic strata for randomised comparative trials of therapeutic agents. In the last few years different models to predict patient outcome in HRPC have been published in the literature. Recently, based on the phase III randomised trial of docetaxel, a multivariate prognostic model incorporating PSA kinetics has been developed to predict survival at 1, 2 and 5 years in metastatic HRPC men treated with chemotherapy. This novel model includes new independent clinical prognostic factors in addition to PSA-DT such as baseline pain, type of progression at baseline (measurable disease or bone scan compared with PSA only), presence of liver metastases and the number of metastatic disease sites. This nomogram will be a helpful tool to stratify patients for further docetaxel-based trials and could also help us to delineate the potential benefits of chemotherapy at certain points during the natural history of HRPC.     

Intermittent docetaxel therapy with estramustine for hormone-refractory prostate cancer in Japanese patients

Background  We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of intermittent docetaxel (DCT) with estramustine (EM) for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Methods  Fifteen patients were enrolled. They received injected DCT (70 mg/m² body surface) on day 1 in association with oral EM 560 mg/day (days 1–5). Treatments were repeated every 3 weeks. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were categorized based on the first three courses. Patients exhibiting either a response or stable disease (SD) could have a holiday from treatment (intermittent schedule). The holiday continued until elevation of the PSA level from the nadir baseline level occurred three times. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and quality of life (QOL). Survival curves were established using Kaplan-Meier graphs. Results  The median number of courses of DCT/EM therapy was five (range, 3–12 courses). The response rate of the first cycle was 53%: 3 patients with complete response (CR), 5 patients with partial response (PR), 4 patients with SD, and 3 patients with disease progression. Eight patients were able to begin the second re-entry cycle. No patients showed a CR, 2 patients exhibited PR, 4 patients had SD, and the overall response rate was 25%. The survival rates were 93% at 1 year, and 26.1% at 2 years Grade 3–4 anemia was observed in 2 patients (13.3%), neutropenia in 11 (73.3%), and thrombocytopenia in 2 (13.3%). The QOL scale showed good QOL after 6 months, with improvement in the score for nausea and vomiting. Conclusion  Intermittent DCT/EM therapy was well tolerated, and has the potential to prolong survival, with a high QOL, in patients with HRPC.     

Treatment of androgen-independent, hormone-refractory prostate cancer with docetaxel in Japanese patients

Background Although patients with prostate cancer with metastatic lesions initially respond to androgen ablation therapy, most patients ultimately develop a hormone-refractory state. Effective treatment for men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) has not been established. We performed a clinical study of docetaxel in HRPC patients, and evaluated its efficacy.Methods Nine patients with HRPC were administered 55 mg/m² docetaxel, every 3 weeks, simultaneously with hormonal therapy, with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog, and daily oral dexamethasone. Change in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was determined as the primary endpoint.Results The mean age of the patients was 64 years (range, 49 to 76 years). Median follow-up time was 8.5 months (range, 5.3 to 16.7 months). In eight patients whose pretreatment serum PSA was elevated, six patients (75.0%) had a PSA decline of more than 50%, and four (50.0%) had a PSA decline of more than 75%. Median time to progression for all patients was 7.9 months (range, 0.0 to 11.6 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0 to 26.3). The median overall survival was 8.5 months (range, 5.3 to 16.7 months; 95% CI, 8.1 to 13.8). Four of six patients (66.7%) with pain before treatment obtained pain relief and were able to discontinue analgesic agents. This regimen was well tolerated. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or leukocytopenia without fever was seen in three patients (33.3%). Only one patient required administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor because of neutropenia. No other grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed.Conclusion Docetaxel was an active agent in Japanese HRPC patients, and was well tolerated in this population. To establish its efficacy and safety in Japanese HRPC patients, a large-scale study in Japan is warranted.     

激素难治性前列腺癌的化疗进展

以多西紫杉醇为基础的化疗是目前激素难治性前列腺癌（ＨＲＰＣ）化疗的常用方法,但并未取得良好效果。近年来各种化疗方案及相关组合的研究报道不断更新,本文就近年的研究进展作一综述。     

Monthly paclitaxel and carboplatin with oral estramustine phosphate in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Background We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of monthly paclitaxel and carboplatin with oral estramustine phosphate in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Methods Patients with prostate cancer that was progressing despite androgen ablation therapy were treated with i.v. paclitaxel, 175 mg/m², over 3 h, followed by carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) on day 1, with oral estramustine phosphate, 280 mg twice daily, for a 28-day treatment cycle. Estramustine phosphate was precluded in those patients who had experienced adverse effects during prior chemotherapies. Patients were evaluated for response every cycle, and the treatment was continued until the cancer progressed. Results Twenty-one patients with progressive hormone-refractory disease were treated for a median of 4 cycles (range, 1 to 11 cycles). Estramustine phosphate was precluded in seven patients. Post-therapy decreases in serum prostate-specific antigen levels of 50% and 75%, respectively, were seen in 43% and 19% of the patients (95% confidence intervals, 22% to 64% and 2% to 36%). Of the nine patients with measurable disease, 1 (11%) had a complete response and 2 (22%) had a partial response. The overall median time to progression was 4 months, and the median survival time for all patients was 11 months. Major grade 3 or 4 adverse effects were anemia (29%), neutropenia (48%), and thrombocytopenia (24%). Mild peripheral neuropathy and myalgia/arthralgia were observed in 11 (52%) and 9 (43%) patients, respectively. Conclusion Monthly paclitaxel and carboplatin with oral estramustine phosphate has significant antitumor activity and is well tolerated in patients with progressive HRPC.     

低剂量磷酸雌二醇氮芥在前列腺癌治疗中的应用

目的:探讨雌二醇氮芥在前列腺癌治疗中的有效应用剂量。方法:回顾性分析低剂量磷酸雌二醇氮芥(EMP)在前列腺癌患者中的应用情况,对服用EMP280mg、2次/天及140mg、2次/天不同剂量下85例前列腺癌患者出现的胃肠道反应及肝功损害的情况进行分析,并比较两种剂量下前列腺癌患者的生存时间。结果:在小剂量EMP治疗时,肝功损害的发生显著减少,而胃肠道反应无明显变化。两种剂量对前列腺癌生存时间无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:减少EMP剂量可降低该药肝功损害的发生,而对前列腺癌治疗效果无明显影响。     

Sunitinib malate (SU-11248) alone or in combination with low-dose docetaxel inhibits the growth of DU-145 prostate cancer xenografts

The aim of the study was to evaluate the activity of the antiangiogenic agent SU-11248 (sunitinib malate, Sutent^®), alone or in combination with docetaxel. To this end, animals bearing DU-145 human hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) xenografts were treated with sunitinib (40 mg/kg daily, p.o.), docetaxel (10 or 30 mg/kg/week, i.v.), a combination of sunitinib (40 mg/kg daily) and docetaxel (10 mg/kg/week) or vehicle alone. At the end of the 3-week dosing schedule, single-agent treatment induced a tumor regression of 59%, 49% and 75% for sunitinib, docetaxel 10 mg/kg, and docetaxel 30 mg/kg, respectively. The combination of sunitinib with low-dose (10 mg/kg) docetaxel produced a tumor regression comparable to that obtained with high-dose (30 mg/kg) docetaxel, but tolerability was higher as indicated by mice weight. Both sunitinib and docetaxel inhibited tumor regrowth after initial treatment with the alternate drug. These results suggest that sunitinib alone or in combination with low-dose docetaxel may have a role in the treatment of HRPC.     

Piecing the puzzle together: Docetaxel cycles and current considerations in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Docetaxel is the current first line therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but there is no standard number of docetaxel cycles given to patients. In their post hoc analysis of the Mainsail study, de Morrée et al. show that the number of docetaxel cycles administered to a patient is a significant factor contributing to overall survival. These findings warrant further investigation into the standardization of the number of docetaxel cycles administered.     

A phase II trial of docetaxel and vinorelbine in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Recent studies of docetaxel have demonstrated improved survival over mitoxantrone and prednisone in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), supporting the study of novel docetaxel-containing regimens as primary therapy or following initial docetaxel-based therapy. To evaluate the combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine in the treatment of patients with HRPC, 40 patients with proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate with progressive metastatic disease despite androgen ablation were enrolled onto this phase II trial. Patients were treated with docetaxel 60 mg/m² on day 1 and vinorelbine 15 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. All patients received dexamethasone 8 mg twice daily for 4 days starting 1 day prior to the docetaxel infusion. After the first three patients were enrolled, filgrastim was added on days 2–6 and 9–13. Of the 40 patients enrolled, 19 had no prior chemotherapy and 21 had received at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. Of the 19 patients without prior chemotherapy and the 21 with prior chemotherapy, 7 (37%) and 6 (29%) , respectively, demonstrated a decrease in prostate specific antigen by >50% maintained for at least 4 weeks. Out of eight patients with measurable disease, one achieved a partial response and four demonstrated stable disease. There was one patient with deep vein thrombosis, and febrile neutropenia was noted in only three patients after the protocol was modified to include filgrastim support. The combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine with filgrastim was well tolerated and active against HRPC in patients with or without prior chemotherapy.This trial was supported in part by research grants from Aventis, Amgen, and P30 CA72720-01-03.     

Randomized phase II study of docetaxel plus estramustine and single-agent docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (Taxotere)-based regimens are the new standard therapy in advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). A synergistic activity has been shown with docetaxel in combination with estramustine in vitro; however, the benefit of this combination remains controversial in clinical practice. We assessed the activity and safety of docetaxel alone and docetaxel-estramustine in HRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 92) with metastatic HRPC and rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) while receiving androgen suppression were randomized to 3-weekly treatment with either docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), day 1 (D), or docetaxel 70 mg/m(2), day 2, plus oral estramustine 280 mg twice daily, days 1-5 (DE). RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were treated (DE 47, D 44). A PSA response occurred in 68% (primary endpoint met) and 30% of patients, respectively. Median PSA response duration was 6.0 months in both groups. Median time to progression was 5.7 and 2.9 months, and median survival was 19.3 and 17.8 months in the DE and D arms, respectively. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxic effects were mild and similar in both arms. One patient in each group withdrew due to toxicity. Quality of life was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Combining estramustine with docetaxel in this schedule is an active and well-tolerated treatment option in HRPC.     

Treatment of advanced hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma with a combination of etoposide,pirarubicin and cisplatin

A total of 20 patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma entered a pilot study of combination chemotherapy based on the EAP (etoposide, Adriamycin and cisplatin) regimen, in which Adriamycin was replaced by pirarubicin, a less cardiotoxic derivative of Adriamycin. The response was assessed by criteria modified from those of the National Prostatic Cancer Project: prostate-specific antigen was employed instead of acid phosphatase. Of 18 evaluable patients, 6 achieved a partial response, 5 had stable disease, and in 7 the disease had progressed during therapy; thus, the overall response rate was 33.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.5–55.1%]. Significant pain alleviation and performance status improvement were obtained in 5 of 12 patients (41.7%; CI 13.8–69.6%) and 3 of 13 patients (23.1%; CI 0.2–46.0%), respectively. Although myelosuppression was moderate to severe, no chemotherapy-related deaths or bacteriologically documented sepsis occurred; nor was there any clinical cardiotoxicity. All the responding patients received maintenance chemotherapy with etoposide thereafter. At present, the median duration of response is 33 weeks (range: 23–91 weeks) and the median survival period for all patients is 42 weeks (range: 27+ –136 weeks), with 12 deaths. In spite of the small number of patients treated, these results suggest that this chemotherapy regimen is active in advanced hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma.     

Possibility of recovery of estrogen sensitivity following high-dose glucocorticoid therapy in a patient with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

A 74-year-old man underwent irradiation therapy (RT) to the prostate bed because of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure after retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). Six months after the RT, a solitary bone metastasis developed in the third thoracic vertebra, and hormonal therapy (HT) was initiated. Three years later, following the loss of response to all hormonal agents, including oral estrogen and glucocorticoid therapy, paraplegia developed, due to a spinal metastasis. RT and high-dose glucocorticoid therapy were given for the spinal metastasis. Diethylstilbestrol diphosphate (DES-DP) was given continuously during this treatment, except for a 1-month period when the patient had pneumonia. After the RT and high-dose glucocorticoid therapy, his serum PSA decreased, from 308 to 36.99 ng/ml. In accordance with the 1-month discontinuation, and then resumption of DES-DP, the serum PSA levels went up and down. So we suspected that the tumor had recovered sensitivity to DES-DP with the high-dose glucocorticoid therapy. With a further decrease of serum PSA to 2.12 ng/ml, he has been alive for more than 3 years to date since the diagnosis of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPCA). To our knowledge, there have been no reports showing such a marked recovery of hormone-sensitivity in HRPCA. No optimal therapy has yet been established for HRPCA; therefore, high-dose glucocorticoid therapy in combination with DES-DP warrants further study.     

Long-term outcome of a phase II study of weekly docetaxel with a short course of estramustine and enoxaparine in hormone-resistant prostate cancer patients

Objective The objective was to define the toxicity and activity of weekly docetaxel administered with a short course of estramustine and enoxaparine in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC). Patients and methods Twenty-four patients were treated with the next regimen: weekly docetaxel 36 mg/m² iv for three consecutive weeks every 28 days, and estramustine 280 mg three times a day for three consecutive days beginning the day before docetaxel (days 1–3, 8–10 and 15–17). In order to prevent thromboembolic events, 40 mg of subcutaneous enoxaparine was administered daily sc on the same days as estramustine. Primary endpoints were: toxicity, especially the presence of thromboembolic events, PSA response rate and response in measurable disease. Secondary endpoints were: time to PSA progression and overall survival. Results Nineteen of 24 patients (79.1%, 95% CI 71–87%) had a PSA response ≥50%. Four of the eleven patients with measurable disease had a partial response. The median time to PSA progression was 7 months (CI 95%: 6.5–9) and the median survival was 19 months (IC 95%: 11–24). Toxicity was manageable with no treatment-related mortality. Only two patients had grade 4 neutropenia. Two patients had thrombotic events, one deep venous thrombosis and one stroke. The main grade 3 non-haematologic toxicity was diarrhoea and asthenia, both in 25% of patients. Conclusions Weekly docetaxel with a short course of estramustine and enoxaparine is active and tolerable in HRPC patients. The observed incidence of thrombosis was lower than previously reported but the association of enoxaparine was not enough to completely prevent the thromboembolic events.     

Complete regression of bone metastases on super bone scan,by low-dose cisplatin,UFT, diethylstilbestrol diphosphate,and dexamethasone in a patient with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Many types of chemotherapy are now being attempted all over the world for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction in almost half of the treated patients has been reported. However, only a few studies have reported the response of bone metastasis. The authors report a patient with HRPC who obtained complete regression of bone metastases on super bone scan by biochemical modulation (BM), dexamethasone, and endocrine therapy. Received: July 18, 2002 / Accepted: January 20, 2003 Correspondence to:S. Hoshi     

The role of doxorubicin and epirubicin in the treatment of patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) is characterized by prevalently osteoblastic bone metastases which are what mostly affect these patients’ quality of life and make the assessment of response to treatment particularly difficult by commonly used criteria. HRPC cannot be cured by any available therapeutic option, and chemotherapy has to be still considered as a palliative treatment. The anthracyclines doxorubicin (Dox) and epirubicin (Epi), alone or in combination with other agents, have been extensively used in the treatment of HRPC, but controversial results have been reported. The majority of reviewed studies reported a pain reduction in >50% of patients receiving Dox or Epi, suggesting a substantial palliative effect by their use in metastatic HRPC. The weekly schedule of anthracyclines seemed to achieve similar results to the 3-weekly schedule but with a better toxicity profile. Although the toxic adverse effects were usually manageable when anthracyclines were combined with other agents, toxicity was severe by a number of aggressive regimens. Docetaxel is today approved for the treatment of HRPC, and must be considered the standard platform on which new agents may be combined. Given that HRPC includes a heterogeneous group of patients with variable rates of tumour growth, the combination of docetaxel with active agents such as anthracyclines may deserve further clinical investigation.     

A phase II Hoosier Oncology Group study of vinorelbine and estramustine phosphate in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to evaluate the combined anti-microtubular regimen of vinorelbine and estramustine phosphate (EMP) in hormone refractory prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Weekly vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 (or 15 mg/m2 if a history of prior pelvic radiotherapy) was combined with EMP at 280 mg orally tds for 3 days (the day before, the day of and the day after vinorelbine infusion). After 8 weeks of therapy the combination was given every other week. RESULTS: From February 1998 to February 1999, 23 men were enrolled with a median age of 69 years (range 50-83 years). The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at entry was 160 ng/ml (range 0-802 ng/ml). A median of 13 weeks of therapy was administered and the median follow-up was 14.8 months. Eleven patients (48%) had lower extremity edema requiring diuretic therapy, two (9%) had grade 2 granulocytopenia and four patients [17%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5% to 39%] had a thromboembolic episode. There was no treatment-related mortality. Fifteen of 21 patients (71%; 95% CI 49% to 89%) had at least a 50% decrease in the PSA for at least 2 months with a median time to serologic progression of 3.5 months (range 0.75-10.5 months). One of eight patients (12.5%; 95% CI 0% to 53%) with measurable disease had a confirmed partial response. The estimated median survival was 15.1 months and the actual one year overall survival was 71% (95% CI 51% to 88%). CONCLUSIONS: Weekly vinorelbine with short course oral EMP is an active regimen as evaluated by rate of PSA response, time to progression and median survival. However, the toxicities of EMP, even when given as a short course, are still problematic.     

Phase I-II study of the somatostatin analogue lanreotide in hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Lanreotide (BIM 32014), a somatulin analogue, was found to be as effective as castration in a rat prostate tumor model. Therapeutic benefit was also demonstrated in the hormone-resistant phase of this tumor model. The activity of lanreotide may be due to a reduction in the levels of growth factors such as insulin growth factor 1 (IGF1). A total of 30 patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer were treated with a slow-release formulation of lanreotide. The mean age was 71 years. Patients were treated with one intramuscular injection of 30mg BIM 23014 once a week and were followed for prostage-specific antigen (PSA) level evolution until disease progression or WHO grade 3 or 4 toxicity and for survival. The patients were treated for a mean duration of 12 weeks (range, 2–60 weeks). The performance status and bone pain were improved in 40% and 35% of patients, respectively. In all, 20% of the patients had a decrease of 50% in PSA levels and 16% showed a stabilization. The biological response was correlated with clinical improvement. The 1-year global survival rate was 72%, with the rate being 89% in the group of patients who were responders on PSA plasma level and 64% in patients with progressive disease. The response duration ranged from 16 to 60 weeks. Toxicity was minor, with transient grade I digestive side effects being noted in a few patients. Lanreotide given at 30 mg once a week to patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer was well tolerated. The response rate was higher than that reported in recent published series. Higher doses of lanreotide should be evaluated.     

多西他赛联合泼尼松或米托蒽醌联合泼尼松治疗激素抵抗性前列腺癌

背景与目的：以多西他赛为核心的化疗方案已经成为激素抵抗性前列腺癌治疗的一线方案：本文初步比较多西他赛联合泼尼松或米托蒽醌联合泼尼松在雄激素抵抗性前列腺癌中的疗效差异，进一步探讨这两种方案的毒副反应。方法：入选雄激素抵抗性前列腺癌患者共83例，其中44例给予多西他赛75mg／m^2 d1静脉滴注联合泼尼松，5mg，每天2次，d1～21口服方案治疗（简称多西他赛组），39例给予米托蒽醌12mg／m^2 d1静脉滴注联合泼尼松，5mg，每天2次，d1～21口服方案治疗（简称米托蒽醌组）。两方案均以21天为1周期，平均治疗5周期：结果：多西他赛组中13．6％（6／44）完全缓解（治疗后PSA下降至4．0ng／ml以下），29．5％（13／44）部分缓解，29．5％（13／44）稳定，27．3％（12／44）进展。缓解和稳定患者的PSA进展中位时间是37．8周（12～101周）。进展的12例患者接受了后续的米托蒽醌组挽救治疗，结果部分缓解16．7％（2／12），稳定25．0％（3／12），2例患者死于疾病进展。米托蒽醌组中7．7％（3／39）完全缓解，25．6％（10／39）部分缓解，25．6％（10／39）稳定，41．0％（16／39）进展：缓解和稳定患者的PSA进展中位时间是25．3周（8～61周）。进展的14例患者接受了后续的多西他赛组方案的挽救治疗，结果完全缓解7．1％（1／14），部分缓解35．7％（5／14），稳定21．4％（3／14）．4例患者死于疾病进展：毒性评估：接受多西他赛组治疗者44例，Ⅲ～Ⅳ度骨髓抑制9例（2例因不能耐受化疗退出），Ⅱ度骨髓抑制14例；接受米托蒽醌组治疗者39例，Ⅲ～Ⅳ度骨髓抑制4例，Ⅱ度骨髓抑制12例。结论：多西他赛组或米托蒽醌组均是治疗雄激素抵抗性前列腺癌的有效化疗方案。两种方案对中国的前列腺癌患者的治疗效果比较接近，但米托蒽醌联合泼尼松的治疗方案的副作用略轻。两种方案交替使用仍可产生部分的反应率，两种方案可以互为挽救方案．且多西他赛联合泼尼松作为挽救方案疗效好于米托蒽醌联合泼尼松。