Phase II trial of mitoxantrone in advanced gastric cancer

A Phase II trial of mitoxantrone was performed in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach. All patients had measurable or evaluable disease, and none had received prior chemotherapy. Mitoxantrone was administered intravenously at a dose of 14 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The major toxicity seen was myelosuppression. The drug was, in general, well tolerated. No major objective responses were seen. We conclude that mitoxantrone has less than 20% activity in this patient population. No further studies are planned.     

Gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II trial

The 5-year survival for pancreatic cancer is usually less than 5%, and no treatment has demonstrated consistent effect on patient survival and disease-related symptoms. Early studies with gemcitabine suggested a modest antitumor activity with significant improvement in disease-related symptoms. This phase II study reports the activity of gemcitabine on 33 consecutive patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. Twenty-three patients had metastatic and 10 locally advanced unresectable disease. Twenty-six patients had not received any previous treatment and seven had received first-line chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil. Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 was administered intravenously in 30 minutes in the first cycle once weekly for up to 7 weeks followed by 1 week rest; then in subsequent cycles, once weekly for 3 of every 4-week cycle. Four patients obtained partial response (12%). Fifteen patients (45%) had stable disease with a median duration of 32 weeks (range: 16-75 weeks), and 14 patients experienced progressive disease. Median duration of response was 34.5 weeks (range: 19-50 weeks). Median survival was 33 weeks (range: 2-91 weeks). All 4 responding patients and 14 of 15 (93%) patients with stable disease had improvement in performance status and decrease in daily analgesic requirement. Toxicity was mild and mainly consisted of moderate and rapidly reversible myelosuppression. We conclude that gemcitabine chemotherapy was very well tolerated and determined a significant clinical improvement with modest antitumoral activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Paclitaxel-cisplatin combination in advanced ovarian cancer: a phase II study

Background. To date there have been four large randomized studies in Western countries examining the role of combining cisplatin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for ovarian cancer. A phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin in Japanese patients with advanced ovarian cancer was performed to determine the objective response rate and toxicity of this regimen. Methods. Previously untreated patients with stage III or IV ovarian cancer and a good performance status were eligible. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 180 mg/m² administered as a 3-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by cisplatin 60 mg/m² i.v. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for at least four cycles. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was not routinely used. Results. Among 26 eligible patients, there were 4 complete and 17 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 80.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.6% to 93.4%). One hundred and twenty-nine treatment cycles were administered to the 26 patients. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 64 treatment cycles (50%) and in 23 patients (88%). Thrombocytopenia was less common. The most common nonhematologic toxicities included neurotoxicity, fatigue, arthralgia/myalgia, and nausea/emesis. Conclusion. Paclitaxel plus cisplatin is a highly active regimen in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The toxicities of this regimen are well tolerated. Received: September 1, 1999 / Accepted: January 11, 2000     

Dose intensification of mitoxantrone in combination with paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer: a phase II study

Background: Paclitaxel and mitoxantrone are highly active agents in the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC). This study evaluated the combination of paclitaxel and mitoxantrone in patients with advanced breast cancer to determine activity and toxicity.Patients and method: 42 patients with ABC were treated with paclitaxel at a fixed dose of 175mg/m2 intravenous (IV) by a 3hour infusion on day 1, while mitoxantrone was given by 2mg/m2 increments, starting from 10mg/m2 by bolus IV injection on day 1 after paclitaxel. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Mitoxantrone doses were increased if the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) had not been reached.Result: The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 69% (CI 95%: 55–83). Six (14%) patients obtained CR and 23 (55%) PR with a median duration of response of 8 months (range 2–16). There were no differences in response rates (RR) between the three levels of mitoxantrone. Median time to failure and survival were 7 months (range 1–26) and 12 months (range 2–29), respectively. After 12 months 14 (33%) patients had died and 8 (19%) patients were alive after 18 months. MTD was reached at 14mg/m2 level of mitoxantrone. Leukopenia was evident in 39 (93%) of total patients and was severe in 28 (67%) patients. All nonhematological toxicity observed was mild.Conclusion: This trial shows the activity of paclitaxel and mitoxantrone in ABC and finds that a dose of 14mg/m2 of mitoxantrone is the MTD in combination with a fixed dose of 175mg/m2 of paclitaxel without granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF).     

Modulation of irinotecan with cyclosporine: a phase II trial in advanced colorectal cancer

Introduction: Despite the extensive clinical experience with irinotecan, significant concerns remain regarding its toxicity. In a phase I trial, we modulated irinotecan pharmacokinetics by inhibiting biliary excretion of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, using cyclosporine. The modulation appeared to decrease the gastrointestinal toxicity of irinotecan and suggested that irinotecan activity might also be retained. Hence, we conducted this phase II trial in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) to further evaluate the toxicity and activity of irinotecan modulated with cyclosporine. Patients and Methods: Sixteen patients with 5-fluorouracil refractory CRC were treated. Cyclosporine (5 mg/kg) was administered as a 6-h infusion and irinotecan (60 mg/m²/day, 90-min infusion) was started 3 h after initiation of the Cyclosporine. Both agents were given weekly for 4 weeks, every 6 weeks. Responses were assessed every 12 weeks, and toxicity was monitored weekly. Results: Sixteen patients were evaluable for toxicity and 11 for response. There was 1 partial response (6%). Five patients had SD lasting a median of 12 weeks. Grade 3/4 diarrhea was observed in only 13% of the patients. Conclusion: Pharmacokinetic modulation of irinotecan using parenteral cyclosporine appears to decrease the incidence of diarrhea in CRC patients. Given the modest activity of irinotecan monotherapy, a larger study would be required to assess if the modulation improves the toxicity without compromising this activity. The available clinical data suggest that pharmacokinetic modulation of irinotecan should be evaluated further to define its optimal clinical utility.Two of the co-authors: Edem Agamah (owns shares of Pfizer) and Mark J. Ratain [Co-inventor on several patents (pending/issued) related to the modulation or irinotecan and/or its Pharmacogenetics] would like to declare their potential conflicts of interest.     

Salvage therapy with ilosfamide and mitoxantrone in advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate the anti-tumour activity and toxicity of ifosfamide(5 g/m² continuous infusion) and mitoxantrone (10 mg/ m² givenin combination every 3 weeks in patients with ovarian cancerresistant to at least two previous regimens which included platinum. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Additional eligibility criteria were an ECOG performance status2 and measurable disease. Of 47 patients entered in the study,8 were defined as platinum-resistant and 39 as potentially sensitiveaccording to Markman's criteria. Thirty-five patients had alsoreceived pacitaxel as last treatment before entering this study.Tumour response was evaluated every three cycles. RESULTS:: One complete and 11 partial responses were reported, for anoverall response rate of 25% (95% CI: 14%–40%). Threeof the partial responders were resistant to num. None of the7 partial responders pretreated with had responded to it. Theoverall median urvival was months. Neutropema G4 was reportedin 18 patients(42%) with hospitalisation because of febrileneutropenia in 3 of them. CONCLUSIONS:: In patients with ovarian cancer failing least 2 previous therapiesincluding platinum, the nation of ifosfamide and mitoxantronehas shown antitumour activity comparable to that of paclitaxel,with accept able toxicity. Objective responses were reportedalso patients failing pacitaxel, suggesting a lack of crossresistance. ifosfamide, mitoxantrone, ovarian cancer     

A negative phase II trial methylene dimethane sulphonate in advanced ovarian cancer (Cancer Research Campaign Phase I/II Trials Committee)

Methylene dimethane sulphonate (MDMS), the first member of the homologous series of dimethane sulphonic acid esters, was administered to 19 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. All patients had received prior chemotherapy and in addition 3 had received prior radiotherapy. MDMS was given as an i.v. bolus injection at a dose of 125mg m-2 and repeated in a q35 day schedule. Ten patients received only one course, six two courses, two three courses and one four courses. The major toxicity was thrombocytopenia which was cumulative. Serious neutropenia did not occur and no infective episodes requiring i.v. antibiotics were seen. Seven patients experience hair loss and four nausea and vomiting. Sixteen patients were evaluable for response but no objective remissions were seen although three patients had stable disease lasting at least 8 weeks. MDMS is therefore not recommended for further trial in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.     

Treatment of indolent lymphoma with fludarabine/mitoxantrone combination: a phase II trial

In an effort to reduce the risk of opportunistic infections, 25 patients with advanced indolent lymphoma (age range: 30-77 years) were treated, using a combination of fludarabine and mitoxantrone, without corticosteroids. Fludarabine was given at 25 mg/m2 for three daily doses, and mitoxantrone at 10 mg/m2. Cycles were repeated every four weeks for up to maximum response, and for no more than six months. Eight patients had follicular lymphoma, and 11 had CLL/SLL. Objective response was observed in 11 of 12 previously untreated patients, including five complete remissions, and in 10 of 13 previously treated patients, including three complete remissions. Only two relapsed patients failed to respond, whereas two patients were not evaluable. Hence, the overall response rate based on the intention-to-treat analysis was 84 per cent (95 per cent CI: 70-98 per cent). The median survival has not been reached after a 22-month follow-up. Median time to progression was 15 months. One patient on corticosteroids developed pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, and an elderly patient succumbed to neutropenic sepsis. Apart from granulocytopenia, the treatment was well tolerated. Omission of corticosteroids reduces the risk of opportunistic infections, while the activity of the combination against indolent lymphoma and CLL is maintained.     

Phase II trial of intraperitoneal mitoxantrone in the management of refractory ovarian cancer

To define both the toxicity and efficacy of intraperitoneal mitoxantrone in the treatment of refractory ovarian carcinoma, 31 patients were entered onto a phase II trial of this agent delivered in a 2 L treatment volume on a monthly basis. Due to excessive local pain at the initial dose level (30 mg/m2), the amount of drug delivered with each treatment course was reduced to 20 mg/m2. Despite this reduction, 74% of patients required narcotic analgesia during treatment. In addition, there were four episodes of bowel obstruction (one requiring surgical intervention) during therapy, and two patients developed bowel obstruction and intraabdominal abscesses following the completion of treatment. Six of 18 evaluable patients (33%) whose largest tumor diameter was less than or equal to 1 cm at protocol initiation experienced surgically documented responses, compared with one of 11 patients (9%) whose largest tumor was greater than 1 cm in diameter. If the two patients exhibiting what we called a mixed response to treatment are included, seven of 21 patients previously treated with intraperitoneal cisplatin responded to this treatment program, including four patients who had failed to respond to intraperitoneal cisplatin. No responding patient has demonstrated clinical evidence of relapse with a median follow-up of 7 months (range, 3+ to 13+ months) from response laparotomy. Intraperitoneal mitoxantrone is an active treatment program in patients with small-volume refractory ovarian carcinoma, but local toxicity can be severe. Due to the toxicity encountered with this specific program, its use cannot be recommended for standard clinical practice. However, in view of the activity observed in refractory ovarian carcinoma, including responses in patients who had previously failed intraperitoneal cisplatin, it is important to continue to explore alternative therapeutic regimens using intraperitoneal mitoxantrone to reduce local toxicity while maintaining or improving efficacy.     

Ifosfamide and vinorelbine in advanced pretreated ovarian cancer: a phase II study

Purpose: The response rate to salvage chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) has been disappointing in patients who do not respond or relapse after platinum-containing regimens. Ifosfamide (IFO) showed an overall response rate of 20% and vinorelbine (VNR) 15.6%. Trials of the association of these two drugs for AOC have not yet been published. Patients and methods: Between April 1996 and August 1997, 17 patients with AOC were treated with intravenous IFO 2000 mg/m² per day, days 1 to 3, with mesna uroprotection, and VNR 25 mg/m² per day, days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. All patients but one had been heavily pretreated. All patients had been treated with platinum compounds and 16/17 with taxanes. Results: All 17 patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 16 for response (one lost to follow-up). One patient showed a partial response, 12 progressive disease and three stable disease. No complete responses were observed. The main toxicity was neutropenia (grade 3-4 in 82% of patients) with neutropenic fever in 17.6% of patients. In 70.5% of patients (19/59 of courses) VNR was not administered on day 8. In four patients (10/59 courses) the dose was reduced by 25% for persistent leukopenia grade 2-3. Other toxicities were not significant. Conclusions: This combination showed no activity in this set of patients. The poor outcome, as compared with the significant activity reported with the agents used singly, could be ascribed to the patients' characteristics, the low dose intensity of VNR administered and possible cross-resistance between the study drugs and previously used agents. Received: 1 December 1999 / Accepted: 25 January 2000     

Phase II trial of weekly or biweekly intraperitoneal mitoxantrone in epithelial ovarian cancer

Previous experimental and clinical evaluation has suggested that ovarian cancer is sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of mitoxantrone at concentrations achievable within the peritoneal cavity after intraperitoneal (IP) administration. Unfortunately, the use of the drug delivered IP at high doses (20 mg/m2 in 2 L normal saline [NS]) on a monthly schedule is compromised by severe local effects secondary to the irritant properties of the drug. To reduce toxicity and take advantage of minimal systemic drug exposure following IP administration, we treated 28 patients with a lower drug concentration of mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2 in 2 L NS), but on a weekly or every other week schedule (total, 12 courses). Compared with the monthly program, this regimen caused less pain, allowed for a higher cumulative dose of mitoxantrone to be delivered, and resulted in less serious treatment-related morbidity. Four of 13 assessable patients (31%) whose largest tumor was less than or equal to 1 cm in diameter demonstrated a surgically defined response. All responding patients had failed previously or exhibited a minimal response to cisplatin. Despite the improved toxicity profile of this regimen, the overall response rate was similar to the monthly program, probably secondary to inadequate IP drug distribution in many patients. Future investigative efforts using IP mitoxantrone as therapy for ovarian cancer might focus on developing methods to improve drug delivery to all sites of tumor within the peritoneal cavity (eg, intraoperative therapy, increased treatment volumes, and antiinflammatory agents to reduce adhesion formation).     

Multicenter, randomized phase II trial of oral CI-1033 for previously treated advanced ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of two doses of CI-1033 in patients with platinum-refractory or recurrent ovarian cancer, and to determine baseline expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in tumor cells. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II, open-label clinical trial evaluated CI-1033 in patients with ovarian cancer who failed prior platinum-based therapy. Two oral doses of CI-1033 were evaluated--a 50-mg and a 200--mg oral dose administered daily for 21 days in a 28-day cycle. Patients were evaluated for tumor response and toxicity; in addition, archival baseline tumor samples were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for erbB1 to erbB4 status. RESULTS: One hundred five eligible patients were treated. Baseline demographic characteristics were balanced in this heavily pretreated patient population. The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens received was four. The most commonly encountered drug-related adverse events for both dose arms were gastrointestinal (diarrhea, nausea, stomatitis) toxicity, asthenia, and rash. No responses were observed. Stable disease was confirmed in 34% and 26% of patients in the 200-mg and 50-mg arms, respectively, and 1-year survival rates were 38.5% and 37.7%, respectively. Baseline erbB3 and erbB4 revealed the highest frequencies of expression, while erbB2 was the lowest. CONCLUSION: CI-1033 did not show activity in unscreened patients with advanced ovarian cancer. At 50 mg/d, CI-1033 had a more favorable adverse events profile than at 200 mg/d. erbB3 and erbB4 receptors showed the highest expression in tumor samples while erbB2 revealed the least. There appears to be no association between baseline erbB expression and disease stability.     

Gemcitabine plus epirubicin in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II multicenter trial

The aim of this phase II multicenter trial was to evaluate the activity of a novel combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and epirubicin (EPI) in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. Clinical benefit and response rate were the main efficacy end-points. From December 1997 to October 1999, 30 consecutive patients with measurable advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously in 30 min at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 followed by i.v. injection of epirubicin 25 mg/m(2); treatment was repeated every 28 days. With regard to clinical benefit response, 8/21 patients (38%) experienced significant palliation of tumor-related symptoms; the median symptom control time was 25 weeks. No complete responses were recorded while 6 patients achieved a partial remission, for an overall response rate of 20%; 10 patients (30%) had a stable disease and 14 (46%) had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 14 weeks. Median survival was 26 weeks, with 6 patients (20%) having long-term survival at 46 weeks. In general, chemotherapy was well tolerated; 9 patients (30%) suffered from WHO grade 3-4 haematological toxicity and 5 patients (16.6%) suffered from grade 3 non-haematological toxicity. In conclusion, the GEM plus EPI regimen represent a feasible approach for improvement of clinical benefit in advanced pancreatic cancer patients, but confirmatory investigations are required.     

Phase II clinical trial of doxifluridine in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

35 evaluable patients were treated with 5′-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (doxifluridine), a fluoropyrimidine derivative. All patients had been heavily pretreated and had refractory disease. Treatment with doxifluridine at a dosage of 3000 mg/m² given intravenously for 5 successive days at 3-week intervals led to 6 partial remissions (17%). The main side-effects were central neurotoxicity, stomatitis and myelotoxicity, resulting in 2 toxic deaths. In patients with renal function disturbances, toxicity proved to be more severe. We concluded that the drug should not be used in patients with renal impairment. Because responses have been encountered, further evaluation of the drug may be warranted in the less toxic oral form.     

A phase II trial of docetaxel in platinum pre-treated patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A Japanese Cooperative Study

Background:This phase II study was conducted to evaluate theefficacy and toxicity of docetaxel in Japanese patients with advanced ovariancancer. Patients and methods:Docetaxel was administered at a dose of 70mg/m² intravenously to patients with platinum pre-treated advancedovarian cancer. Treatment was repeated every three weeks. No routinecorticosteroid premedication was given. Results:Ninety patients with advanced ovarian cancer were enteredand sixty were assessable for response. The overall response rate was28% in the assessable patients (95% confidence interval(95% CI): 17.5%–41.4%). CA125 responses were seenin 8 (24%) of 34 assessable patients for CA125 criteria. The 36platinum-refractory patients had a response rate of 25% compared with33% in the platinum-sensitive patients. The predominant toxicity wasneutropenia, with 86% of the patients experiencing grade 3 or 4.Hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 37% of the patients and were notlife threatening. Edema was mild and infrequent. Conclusion:Docetaxel at 70 mg/m² demonstratedeffectiveness as a treatment of both platinum-sensitive andplatinum-refractory ovarian cancer patients, with a low incidence of severehypersensitivity reactions and edema.     

Combining gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients with advanced biliary cancer: a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: Biliary cancer has a poor prognosis, and chemotherapy has had little impact. The objectives of this trial were to determine the response rate, time to disease progression, survival, and safety profile of the combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine (GemCap) in patients with advanced biliary cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had pathologically proven, locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma arising from the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts or gallbladder with no prior chemotherapy. Patients were treated on a 3-week cycle consisting of capecitabine at 650 mg/m(2) orally twice a day for 14 days and gemcitabine at a fixed dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled between July 2001 and January 2004. Fifty-three percent of patients had cholangiocarcinoma, 47% had gallbladder cancer, and 89% had metastatic disease. The overall objective response rate was 31%, with an additional 42% of patients with stable disease, for a disease control rate of 73%. The median overall survival time was 14 months (95% CI, 7.3 months to not available), and the median progression-free survival time was 7 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 11.8 months). This chemotherapy combination was generally well tolerated. Transient neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and hand-foot syndrome were commonly observed but were easily managed without discontinuing further treatment. CONCLUSION: The significant antitumor activity combined with a mild toxicity profile seen in this study argue that GemCap chemotherapy may benefit patients with advanced biliary cancer. This regimen warrants further evaluation in a randomized study with survival and quality of life end points.     

Randomized phase III clinical trial evaluating weekly cisplatin for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

This randomized, open label, phase III clinical trial (1988-1992) compared the efficacy and safety of a dose-dense regimen of single-agent cisplatin with a standard 3-weekly schedule in first-line chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Two hundred eighty-five patients were randomly assigned to the experimental dose-dense arm (cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) weekly × nine cycles) or to the control (standard treatment) arm (cisplatin 75 mg/m(2), administered on day 1 every 21 days × six cycles). The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), overall response to chemotherapy, and toxicity. Toxicity and response to treatment were compared with the χ(2) test using trend or exact correction. PFS and OS were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analyses and treatment hazard ratios (HRs) with the Cox proportional hazards model. All statistical tests were two-sided. After a median follow-up of 16.8 years, no differences were observed between the two treatments in PFS (experimental arm: 17.2 months; control arm: 18.1 months; HR = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83 to 1.40; P = .57) and in OS (experimental arm: 35 months; control arm: 32 months; HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.75 to 1.26; P = .97). Thus, increasing dose intensity of cisplatin does not improve PFS or OS compared with standard chemotherapy.     

Intranasal buserelin in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer: a phase II trial

Thirty-five patients with advanced prostatic cancer were entered in a trial of nasally administered gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue agonist (GnRHA) buserelin. Four patients were unevaluable for response and toxicity. Twenty-five patients responded to treatment, two with complete remissions, 12 with partial remissions, and 11 who improved. The median baseline value for testosterone was 14.4 nmol/L. After 1 week of treatment, the median value was 10.8 nmol/L, while after 1 month the median value had decreased to 1.1 nmol/L (normal, 10.0 to 34.7). It is concluded that intranasal buserelin is an effective, simple, and safe method to achieve androgen deprivation in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer and is an alternative to orchiectomy and more acceptable than daily subcutaneous injections.     

Tegafur and uracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II trial

The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of tegafur and uracil (UFT; 1:4 molar ratio) plus leucovorin (LV) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. One hundred forty-one patients were entered into the study. The treatment schedule consisted of UFT 300 mg/m2/day (in three divided doses) plus oral LV 150 mg/day (50 mg t.i.d.) over 28 days. The treatment cycle was repeated every 5 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed. The treatment was interrupted if grade 3/4 toxicity appeared and was resumed at the same dosage on recovery. One hundred thirty-six patients were evaluable for response and 141 were evaluable for toxicity. The response rate was 19.9% (95% confidence interval: 12%-28%). The total number of patients without progression (objective response + stable disease) was 76 (55.9%). The median time to progression was 5.6 months, and the overall survival was 11.6 months. The toxicity profile was low, with 11% of patients experiencing grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting, while 17% had grade 3/4 diarrhea. Oral administration of UFT modulated with LV is a comfortable regimen of chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.