The effect of cromolyn sodium powder as a treatment for ragweed pollinosis

The effect of treating ragweed pollinosis with intranasal cromolyn sodium powder was evaluated in 26 patients in a double-blind clinical study. Thirteen matched patient pairs were treated by either nasal insufflation of cromolyn sodium powder, 20 mg three times daily, or by a placebo powder. Patients were monitored for severity of symptoms by means of daily symptom diaries collected weekly throughout the pollen season. Serum samples were obtained in July prior to the ragweed season and following the ragweed season during the first and fourth weeks of October for the determination of ragweed-specific IgE antibody levels by the radioallergosorbent test. A significant reduction in symptom severity was observed in the treated patients with high preseasonal levels of IgE antibody to ragweed. Initially the levels of IgE antibody to ragweed did not differ between the two groups. IgE antibody levels increased in both groups after pollen exposure, but the treated group showed a significantly greater rise in IgE antibody levels. The results suggest that treatment with cromolyn sodium enhanced IgE antibody response to pollen exposure and significantly reduced the severity of hay fever symptoms in patients with high preseasonal levels of IgE antibody to ragweed.     

Preseasonal intranasal immunotherapy with nebulized short ragweed extract

We determined the effect of preseasonal intranasal short ragweed (SRW) immunotherapy in a double-blind, nonpaired, 20-wk study involving 33 SRW-sensitive patients. Patients were selected on the basis of an elevated IgE serum antibody level, a positive intradermal skin test, and a positive intranasal challenge to SRW antigen. SRW-treated patients sprayed SRW solutions intranasally six times a day for 12 wk preseasonally. Placebo-treated patients used nebulized solutions containing buffer or histamine that were interchanged randomly throughout this period. The SRW-treated group reported more preseasonal symptoms than the placebo-treated group (p < 0.003); however, during the SRW pollination season, the SRW-treated group reported significantly less sneezing, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, red/itchy eyes, itchy nose/throat, and cough/wheeze. Supplemental antihistamine usage was similar in both groups. The treatment did not affect serum IgE antibody levels to crude SRW, AgE, Ra3, or Ra5 in either group at any time during the study. No significant production of IgG antibody to SRW was seen in either group. One SRW-treated patient developed acute sinusitis after 2 wk of treatment; otherwise no side effects other than symptoms of hay fever were noted. Although intranasal SRW immunotherapy may offer an effective and less costly alternative to parenteral immunotherapy, reduction in hay fever symptoms during the pollination season was achieved at the expense of provoking these symptoms during the preceding weeks.     

Comparisons of alum-precipitated and unprecipitated aqueous ragweed pollen extracts in the treatment of hay fever

In 1969 and 1970, groups of patients with ragweed hay fever never before treated were started on preseasonal courses of immunization with an alum precipitate of aqueous ragweed extract. A comparison between these two groups of patients and a similar group of patients treated with unprecipitated aqueous extract in 1968 shows that treatment with alum precipitate was safely initiated with fewer injections even though a higher dose was administered. The larger cumulative dose appeared to give better IgG antibody responses and greater relief of symptoms. A repeat preseasonal course the next year again required fewer injections of the alum-precipitated extract than a repeat course of aqueous extract.     

A controlled study of the effectiveness of the Rinkel method of immunotherapy for ragweed pollen hay fever

In a double-blind study, we compared the effects of the Rinkel method of immunotherapy with ragweed pollen extract and placebo on symptoms of ragweed hay fever and immunologic parameters in 24 ragweed-sensitive patients. Each had a skin-test end point by Rinkel serial dilution titration to ragweed pollen extract at 1:312,500 w/v or greater dilution, a 2+ skin test to ragweed AgE at 0.1 μg/ml or greater dilution, and in vitro leukocyte histamine release by ragweed pollen extract. None had had immunotherapy for at least 7 yr. Patients matched on the basis of leukocyte histamine release by ragweed were assigned to two treatment groups (12 patients in each group). One group received ragweed pollen extract, and the other, placebo, both administered by the Rinkel method between June and October, 1978. Treatment doses were derived from skin-test end points. The median maintenance (“optimal dose”) for patients receiving ragweed pollen extract was 0.53 ml of 1:312,500 w/v and the mean cumulative dose of ragweed pollen extract given during the study contained 0.094 μg of ragweed AgE. Symptom-medication scores of all patients rose and fell with ragweed pollen counts. No significant differences were observed in mean daily symptom-medication scores, antiragweed IgG or IgE levels, leukocyte histamine release by ragweed, total IgE levels, or skin-test end-point dilutions with ragweed pollen extract between the group receiving ragweed pollen extract and the group receiving placebo. Despite the absence of specific effect on symptom-medication scores and measured immunologic variates, 10 of the 12 ragweed-treated patients and 10 of the 12 placebo-treated patients were of the opinion that their hay fever symptoms during the ragweed pollen season were less severe in 1978 than in 1977 and that they had been helped by Rinkel method immunotherapy. Under the conditions of the study, Rinkel method immunotherapy with ragweed pollen extract was no more effective than placebo given in an imitation of the Rinkel method.     

Immunotherapy in Spring-Time Hay Fever

In a study of the efficacy of two different treatment schedules for perennial immunotherapy, 47 adult patients with spring-time hay fever due to allergy against birch and other deciduous trees were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: one group received birch, alder and hazel allergen in Allpyral, another group received the same Allpyral mixture and in addition all relevant tree pollens in aqueous extract and a control group received no injections. For determination of antibody titres the radioallergosorbent test (RAST) and the ammonium sulphate precipitation (ASP) technique were used. Cellular responsiveness was studied by measuring birch pollen (BP) induced leucocyte histamine release in peripheral blood. The clinical and immunological response was similar in the two treated groups. Treated patients had less symptoms and a lower consumption of antihistamine tablets during the pollen season than the control group. Non-IgE BP antibodies and IgE antibodies recorded with the ASP technique increased after immunotherapy while RAST values did not change significantly. A decrease of RAST values from postseasonal values during the first year to preseasonal values in the following year was seen in all patient groups but was less pronounced in treated than in untreated patients. The decrease was more pronounced in patients with high RAST values of postseasonal sera than in patients with low RAST values. Cellular reactivity increased slightly during the first phase of therapy but returned to the pre-treatment level later. Clinical improvement was positively correlated to the percentage increase of non-IgE antibody titre and to the pre-treatment non-IgE/IgE antibody ratio. Patients with high preseasonal RAST titres or high cellular sensitivity tended to have more severe symptoms during the pollen season. It is concluded that a mixture of birch, alder and hazel is sufficient for immunotherapy in spring-term hay fever. It is obvious that changes of a single immunological variable do not account for the therapeutic results in immunotherapy.     

Diagnostic tests in ragweed hay fever. A comparison of direct skin tests, IgE antibody measurements, and basophil histamine release

In 87 patients with both spring and fall hay fever symptoms the radioallergosorbent test (RAST) technique for specific IgE antibodies to ragweed was compared with basophil histamine release and direct intradermal skin testing by the threshold dilution technique. The three techniques gave good agreement except with the leastsensitive patients, some of whom had a positive skin test but undetectable histamine release or IgE antibodies. Twenty-one patients who were highly sensitive to ragweed as measured by all three techniques were followed without specific immunotherapy. There was significant agreement between the level of positivity of all three tests and the symptom index obtained during the ragweed season. In 14 of the 21 patients there was a significant correlation between daily ragweed pollen counts and daily symptom indexes during the season. On the other hand, among the 16 least-sensitive patients (as judged by histamine release) the correlation between daily ragweed pollen counts and symptom indexes was significant in only 3 patients. Other significant allergens could not be identified in the latter group, and the cause of their symptoms is not clearly identified but appears not to be ragweed. The RAST is a quantitative technique that gives diagnostically useful information in ragweed hay fever, although not significantly different from basophil histamine release or carefully performed skin testing. The convenience to the patient may, however, offer a noticeable advantage.     

Booster immunotherapy (BIT)

This study tries to answer two questions: 1) how long does the therapeutic effect of successful immunotherapy (IT) last after termination of the treatment? and 2) what is the best treatment for recidivist patients? To answer the first question, we asked 108 patients with rye/grass pollen allergy who had previously undergone IT for 3–4 years and had responded well to treatment to complete a questionnaire on the course of their recovery after termination of the therapy. Evaluation of the answers revealed a recidivist rate of approximately 30% in the first 3 years. According to our results, the risk of a relapse after this period seems to be low. To answer the second question, we included 40 patients suffering from type I allergy to grass/rye pollen in a clinical study. Each of them had previously undergone specific IT with a grass pollen extract mixture and had terminated this therapy after 3–4 years practically free of symptoms during the grass pollen season. As the symptoms returned and increased from year to year after the end of IT, new therapeutic steps had to be considered. We investigated the efficacy of a short preseasonal injection treatment called “booster immunotherapy” (BIT). BIT was performed with two different injection-regimens, a low-dose schedule comprising six injections and a high-dose schedule with 11 injections, in both cases administered as a build-up regimen. In the next pollen season, 28/40 (70%) patients reported strong improvement or even complete remission of the allergy symptoms. All patients showed a distinct change in their response to provocation tests and in IgG4 antibody liters; however, no correlation between improved in vivo or in vitro tests and effectiveness of the therapy could be observed. The results show the efficacy of both booster schedules, and we therefore recommend BIT as a valid alternative to repeating conventional, long-term IT.     

Controlled studies of intranasal immunotherapy for ragweed pollenosis

During 1978 a double blind study compared the efficacy of preseasonal short ragweed (RW) extract intranasal immunotherapy with a histamine placebo; in 1979 more prolonged treatment with a larger dose of polymerized ragweed (PRW) was evaluated. In neither year did the placebo-treated patients show significantly more severe disease as assessed by daily symptom diaries, examination in season, comparison of overall symptom severity with previous years or changes in nasal challenge tests. Following treatment in 1979 there was a significantly greater amount of secretory IgA and IgG ragweed antibodies secreted by the nose of the PRW-treated group, but these titers did not correlate with clinical results.     

The role of ragweed pollen in autumnal asthma

Thirty-nine ragweed-allergic seasonal asthmatics were studied from 1972 to 1974. After quantitative skin tests, antigen E-induced leukocyte histamine release, quantitative inhalation bronchial challenge with ragweed extract to determine PD35 (provocation dose of allergen causing 35% decrease in specific airways conductance), and radioallergosorbent test (RAST) determinations were done, patients were paired based on PD35 values and randomly assigned to treatment or placebo groups, receiving either aqueous ragweed extract or placebo prior to the 1973 ragweed season. Treated patients received a mean cumulative dose of extract equivalent to 11.7 microng antigen E (4,180 protein nitrogen units [PNU]). Twenty-nine patients were followed through the ragweed season with daily symptom diaries and biweekly physician examinations. Severity of disease was not predictable by PD35 data, skin tests, leukocyte histamine release, or radioallergosorbent test (RAST) values. Although all patients were ragweed-allergic by objective tests, only 13/29 had asthma symptoms correlating with ragweed counts. Mold spore counts were related significantly to symptoms in some patients. Asthma and hay fever symptoms correlated significantly in 24/29 patients. This dose of immunotherapy caused no significant difference to be found in asthma or hay fever symptoms in treated versus placebo patients for the 1973 reporting period as determined by physician evaluations or daily symptom diaries. No patients showed significant improvement in PD35 values after treatment in 1973. Similar findings were obtained for a smaller group of patients followed through the 1974 ragweed season who received a mean dose of 31.2 microng antigen E (11,140 PNU). The failure of these patients to show a response to immunotherapy could be due to a combination of the relatively low dose of ragweed extract and their sensitivity to other allergens.     

Allergen injection therapy with glutaraldehyde-modified--ragweed pollen-tyrosine adsorbate. A double-blind trial.

The effect of a preseasonal course of four injections of glutaraldehyde-modified—ragweed pollen-tyrosine adsorbate (MRTA), in a total dose of 7,000 Noon pollen units, was compared with a tyrosine base placebo in a double-blind trial in 43 matched patients with ragweed pollen-induced allergic rhinitis. During the pollen season, troublesome symptoms were treated with a standardized therapeutic regimen. The minimum medication requirement that adequately controlled symptoms was used as the main indicator of severity of the allergic rhinitis. Consequently, the symptom scores were similar in both treatment groups; however, the MRTA-treated group required approximately 50% less medication than the placebo group (p < 0.05). Subjective improvement was reported by 67% of the MRTA group and 38% of the placebo group (0.05 < p < 0.1). Serum concentrations of IgE and IgG antibodies to ragweed increased in response to MRTA (p < 0.02) but not in response to placebo. Side effects of MRTA included generalized urticaria in 2, mild asthma in 1, and large late swellings at the injection site which necessitated stopping the injections in 6 patients. MRTA was superior to placebo in reducing the severity of ragweed pollen-induced allergic rhinitis and was associated with a modest incidence of side effects.     

Clinical and immunologic evaluation of glutaraldehyde-modified, tyrosine-adsorbed short ragweed extract: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Glutaraldehyde-modified, tyrosine-adsorbed ragweed extract (GTR) is a modification of allergen extract to reduce allergenicity but retain immunogenicity. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and immunologic changes associated with the administration of GTR (16,350 protein nitrogen units) or placebo to a group of 100 atopic subjects with ragweed hay fever. The study was carried out in a double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion. Clinical response was measured by daily symptom diaries. physician evaluations, and patient responses. Changes in ragweed-specific IgE and IgG antibody were evaluated with an amplified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (alpha-ELISA) and were compared with measurements by RAST and a protein A-binding assay for IgG antibody. Treatment with GTR resulted in a sixfold increase in blocking IgG antibody and a small increase in IgE-specific antibody. No changes occurred in the placebo treated group. Mild immediate local reactions occurred after 74% of injections, and late-onset local reactions occurred after 62% of injections in the treated group. The placebo-treated group experienced immediate or late local reaction after only 12% of injections. There were two mild late-onset urticarial reactions of a generalized nature in the treatment group. The treatment group experienced significantly fewer symptoms than the placebo group throughout the season (p less than 0.02), although the difference was not dramatic. The results showed that GTR could be safely given in five preseasonal injections, with retained immunogenicity but less potential for generalized reactions. GTR is an improved method of allergy immunotherapy with the potential for clinical benefit when used in a brief preseasonal treatment regimen.     

The effect of preseasonal immunotherapy on the production of histamine-releasing factor (HRF) by mononuclear cells from patients with seasonal asthma: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study

The effect of immunotherapy on the production of histamine-releasing factor (HRF) by mononuclear cells (MNC) from patients with seasonal asthma was investigated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Twenty-four patients with asthma were randomly divided into a placebo-treated group and a grass pollen-treated group. In vitro production of HRF by MNCs and the provocative concentration of histamine that causes 20% fall in FEV1 were measured before and after immunotherapy, and symptoms were monitored during the pollen season. MNCs from the patients were either cultured alone, spontaneous HRF production (spHRF), or in the presence of grass allergens (grass-stimulated HRF production), and the supernatants were assayed for HRF activity with basophils from a single donor after the study. We found that MNCs from patients with seasonal asthma to grass pollen spontaneously produce substantial amounts of HRF. The group of patients treated with placebo developed typical symptoms in the pollen season and also an increase in HRF production. In contrast, patients treated with grass pollen demonstrated reduced symptoms and no increase in spHRF production. A high degree of correlation between spHRF productions and symptom scores in both treated groups was noted. After 2 years of immunotherapy, allergen-stimulated HRF production decreased significantly, whereas spHRF production decreased significantly only in the patients who were clinically benefitted. The change in the provocative concentration of histamine that causes 20% fall in FEV1 during the pollen season highly correlated with the change in HRF production. The results of this study suggest that HRF might be involved in the pathogenesis of atopic asthma.     

A comparative study of the effectiveness of the Rinkel method and the current standard method of immunotherapy for ragweed pollen hay fever

In a double-blind study, we compared the effects of the Rinkel and the current standard methods of immunotherapy with ragweed pollen extract and those of placebo on symptoms of ragweed hay fever and immunologic parameters in 43 patients highly sensitive to ragweed. Each had a skin-test end point by Rinkel serial titration at 1:312,500 w/v or greater dilution, a 2+ skin test to ragweed AgE 0.01 μg/ml, and in vitro histamine release by ragweed pollen extract. None had had immunotherapy for at least 7 yr. Patients were matched on the basis of leukocyte histamine release to ragweed pollen extract and assigned to treatment groups. Fourteen received ragweed pollen extract by the Rinkel method, 14 received placebo, and 15 received ragweed pollen extract by the current standard method weekly between February and October, 1979. Rinkel method doses were derived from skin-test end points and were advanced to 0.5 ml of the end-point dilution; current standard method doses were advanced to the highest tolerated dose. The median maintenance dose for Rinkel method patients was 0.5 ml of 1:1,562,500 w/v (0.001 μg AgE), and for current standard method patients was 0.3 ml of 1:100 w/v (11 μg AgE). An additional unmatched group of nine similar patients received Rinkel method immunotherapy in both 1978 and 1979. Under the conditions of this study, the current standard method of immunotherapy produced a significant decrease in ragweed hay fever symptom-medication scores, increase in antiragweed IgG levels, and decrease in seasonal rise in antiragweed IgE levels in comparison with the effects of either Rinkel method or placebo. The effect of the Rinkel method on these variates was not significantly different from the effects of placebo.     

Local intranasal immunotherapy with high-dose polymerized ragweed extract

Thirty-one ragweed-allergic patients received preseasonal local intranasal immunotherapy (LNIT) with high doses of gluteraldehyde-polymerized ragweed extract (average total dose 544 micrograms antigen E). Minimal side effects were reported during treatment and did not interfere with the dosing schedule. During the ragweed pollen season, LNIT-treated patients had lower symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhea and nasal congestion than a comparable group of untreated ragweed-allergic patients. There was no difference in ragweed-induced eye symptoms between the two groups. Secretory ragweed-specific IgA and IgG rose following LNIT treatment. Absolute antibody titers and changes in titers did not correlate with clinical improvement. LNIT with the polymerized ragweed did not block the seasonal rise in serum ragweed-specific IgE. These results suggest that LNIT with high-dose polymerized ragweed extract is a safe, simple and effective form of immunotherapy.     

A multi-institutional trial of polymerized whole ragweed for immunotherapy of ragweed allergy

Eighty ragweed-sensitive patients in four cities were recruited to study the safety and efficacy of partially purified, polymerized whole ragweed (PRW) as an improved form of immunotherapy. Groups of 20 patients in Chicago, Boston, Memphis, and St. Louis had blood drawn for immunologic studies before and after the 1978 and 1979 ragweed seasons and completed detailed daily symptom score sheets each day of the 1978 and 1979 ragweed pollen seasons. Beginning in March, 1979, all patients except one received 15 weekly injections of PRW totaling 50,000 protein nitrogen units (PNU) and containing about 500 μg ragweed AgE. One patient received 25,000 PNU. Symptom score indices of the posttreatment 1979 season were compared with those from the pretreatment 1978 season and also with the scores of similar groups of ragweed-sensitive patients in each city treated only with medication for symptomatic relief during the 1979 season. Local reactions to polymerized ragweed immunotherapy were minimal. No abnormalities in complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, chest x-ray film, urinalysis, or rheumatoid factor occurred in the immunotherapy-treated groups. Total serum antibody binding of ragweed AgE increased 12-fold following immunotherapy. When compared either with their 1978 untreated group scores or when compared with scores from the untreated group in each city in 1979 (control group), the symptom score indices of the immunotherapy-treated groups in 1979 were significantly improved. PRW is efficacious in the treatment of ragweed hay fever and can be administered more safely and in higher doses with fewer injections than conventional extracts. It represents an improved form of immunotherapy.     

Combination of parenteral and oral immunotherapy in grass pollen-allergic children

Twenty patients with a proven sensitization to grass pollens were treated with parenteral "priming" and subsequently with either oral "booster" (n = 10) or placebo (n = 10) extension course. The study was carried out in a double-blind manner. Cumulative preseasonal parenteral dosage was 3,100 NU (Noon Units), patients in the oral group subsequently received 123.9 mg of grass pollen extract during the pollen season. No side effects were noted after intake of the oral preparation. No significant difference (95% confidence interval) were noted comparing results of in vivo (skin prick test and conjunctival provocation test) and in vitro tests (specific serum IgE- and IgG-antibodies) between the two groups. Analysis of symptom and medication scores as well as subjective assessment of patients revealed no superiority of oral "booster" over placebo. Data obtained in this study does not support the concept of combined parenteral and oral treatment. This is in contrast to work reported previously.     

Preseasonal local allergoid immunotherapy to grass pollen in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial

BACKGROUND: We assessed the efficacy of preseasonal local allergoid immunotherapy in a group of children with asthma and/or rhinitis and/or rhinoconjunctivitis due to grass pollen. METHODS: We randomly assigned 24 children allergic to grass pollen to receive local allergoid immunotherapy for 3 months before the pollen season and 24 such patients to receive identically appearing placebo. The immunotherapy consisted of tablets of monomeric allergoid grass pollen allergens held in the mouth until they dissolved and then swallowed. The study was double-blind. Symptoms and medications were scored on diary cards during the pollen season. Nasal eosinophil cationic protein levels were measured by the monoclonal antibodies EG1 and EG2 outside the pollen season and at low and at high pollen concentration during the pollen season. RESULTS: The active-treatment group had a statistically significant reduction of total symptoms (P<0.05), especially bronchial symptoms (P<0.05), in comparison with the placebo group. Immunotherapy was well tolerated and compliance was good. Nasal levels of EG2 and EG1 increased significantly during the pollen season, but there was no difference between groups. EG2/EG1 increased significantly only in the placebo group during natural allergen exposure (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that this immunotherapy is effective for the treatment of asthma due to grass pollen in children.     

Long-term intense exposure to grass pollen can mask positive effects of allergenic immunotherapy on non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness

Introduction

There are many potential factors that can modulate bronchial reactivity, including exposure to allergens, viral infections, and medications. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of grass pollination intensity on the bronchial reactivity in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) patients subjected to subcutaneous allergenic immunotherapy (SCIT).

Material and methods

This study, performed between 2005 and 2008, included 41 patients with confirmed sensitivity to grass pollens and predominating symptoms of SAR, randomly assigned to desensitization by pre-seasonal or maintenance SCIT. Bronchial provocation challenge with histamine was performed before the onset of immunotherapy, and repeated three times after each pollen season covered by this study. Bronchial reactivity was analyzed with regard to grass pollination intensity in 2005–2008 (air concentration of grass pollen grains, seasonal number of days when air concentration of grass pollen reached at least 20 or 50 grains per 1 m³).

Results

After 3 years of SCIT, a significant decrease in bronchial responsiveness was observed in the analyzed group as confirmed by an increase in PC₂₀ FEV₁ histamine values (p = 0.001). An inverse tendency was observed after 2 years of SCIT, however. This second year of SCIT corresponded to the 2007 season, when a significantly higher number of days with at least 50 grains of pollen per 1 m³ of air was recorded.

Conclusions

Fluctuations in pollination intensity observed during consecutive years of immunotherapy can influence bronchial reactivity in patients subjected to SCIT (ISRCTN Register: ISRCTN 86562422).     

Controlled evaluation of allergoid in the immunotherapy of ragweed hay fever

Immunotherapy with ragweed allergoid administered in a clustered regimen, placebos in a clustered regimen, and unaltered ragweed extract (allergen) in a weekly regimen were compared in three groups of hay fever patients carefully matched for ragweed sensitivity. The allergoid and placebo comparison was performed double-blind and the unaltered ragweed extract comparison was single-blind. In terms of antigen E (AgE) equivalents, doses were about 50 times higher in the allergoid-treated group than in the allergen-treated group. Whereas there was no immunologic response to placebos, the allergoid regimen produced a more rapid serum IgG antibody response, with significantly higher posttreatment levels than those in the allergen regimen. Initial IgE antibody rises and subsequent slow declines were similar. Symptom-medication scores were similar in the two specifically treated groups and significantly less than scores reported by the placebo group (p less than 0.01). Due to an overestimate of the initial allergoid doses, systemic reactions occurred mostly in the early visits with allergoid treatment, whereas systemic reactions appeared late in the allergen treatment. The overall incidence was similar. In a second year, after 8 mo of no injections, a preseasonal booster regimen with both materials produced virtually no untoward reactions. During the period of no injections, IgG antibody declines were modest and, after boosters, IgG antibody levels rose promptly. Clinical results in both groups were again excellent, with an advantage for allergoid.     

Capacity of purified antigens and whole pollen extracts to release histamine from leukocytes of hay fever patients

Eighty-seven consecutive patients appearing with complaints suggestive of spring and fall hay fever were subjected to basophil histamine release study with 4 antigenic preparations: whole ragweed extract, antigen E of ragweed, mixed grass pollen extract, and Group I antigen of rye grass. Among the 87 patients, 12 failed to release histamine to ragweed extract or antigen E and 16 failed to release histamine to grass extract or Group I. Among the remaining patients 5 reacted to whole ragweed extract but not antigen E and 2 reacted to mixed grass extract but not Group I. The patients with this pattern were all at the lower end of the spectrum of sensitivity for the crude extracts. These data tend to confirm that antigen E and Group I are the antigens of prime importance in the majority of hay fever patients with ragweed and grass pollen sensitivity respectively.