Adjuvant growth hormone therapy in poor responders to in-vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study

The objective of the study was to assess the effect of growthhormone (GH) supplementation to a combined gonado-trophin-releasinghormone agonist/human menopausal gonadotrophin (GnRHa/HMG) treatmentprotocol on ovarian response in ‘poor responders’undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF). GH or a placebo wereadministered in a prospective randomized double-blind manner.A total of 14 poor-responder patients (oestradiol < 500 pg/ml,less than three oocytes retrieved in two previous IVF cycles)were randomly allocated to a combined treatment of either GnRHa/HMG/GH (18 IU on alternate days, total dose 72 IU) or GnRHa/ HMGplacebo. No difference was found between the study and controlgroups in the number of HMG ampoules used, the number of follicles(>14 mm) and serum oestradiol concentrations on the day ofadministration of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), the numberof oocytes retrieved and fertilized, and the number of embryostransferred. The GH group (n = 7) did not show a better ovulatoryresponse in the study cycles; mean ± SD serum oestradiolon day of HCG 411 ± 124 versus 493 ± 291 pg/ml,aspirated oocytes 2.2 ± 1.5 versus 1.9 ± 2.0.Interestingly, when the above results for the placebo groupwere compared with their previous cycles (serum oestradiol 403± 231 pg/ml; 0.4 ± 0.5 aspirated oocytes), a non-specificeffect was found. Follicular recruitment, oestradiol secretionby mature follicles and the number of oocytes retrieved in poorresponders were not improved by GH supplementation.     

Endocrinology: Luteal function following ovulation induction in polycystic ovary syndrome patients using exogenous gonadotrophins in combination with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist

The luteal phase was studied in 12 polycystic ovary syndrome(PCOS) patients following ovulation induction using exogenousgonadotrophins combined with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormoneagonist (GnRH-a). Human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) was precededby 3 weeks of treatment with GnRH-a (buserelin; 1200 µg/dayintra-nasally) and administered in a step-down dose regimenstarting with 225 IU/day i.m. GnRH-a was withheld the day beforeadministration of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; 10 000IU i.m.). Blood sampling and ultrasound monitoring was performedevery 2–3 days until menses. The luteal phase was significantlyshorter in PCOS patients as compared to eight regularly cyclingcontrols: 8.8 (3.3–11.4) days [median(range)] versus 12.8(8.9–15.9) days (P = 0.01). Median peak values for progesteronedid not show significant differences comparing both groups:52.3 (17.1–510.3) nmol/l versus 43.0 (31.2–71.1)nmol/l, respectively (P = 0.8). The interval between the dayof the progesterone peak and return to baseline was significantlyshorter in the PCOS patients than in controls: 2.5 (0.3–4.9)days versus 4.2 (3.9–10.5) days (P < 0.005). Luteinizinghormone (LH) concentrations during the luteal phase as reflectedby area under the curve were significantly lower in PCOS ascompared to controls: 4.4 (1.6–21.0) IU/l x days and 49.0(27.8–79.6) IU/l x days, respectively (P < 0.001).In conclusion, patients with PCOS may suffer from insufficientluteal phases after ovulation induction using HMG/HCG in combinationwith a GnRH-a. The corpus luteum apparently lacks the supportof endogenous LH and may be stimulated only by the pre-ovulatoryinjection of HCG. Potential involvement of adjuvant GnRH-a medicationor HCG itself in luteal suppression of endogenous gonadotrophinsecretion, and the importance of luteal function for pregnancyrates following treatment, warrant further studies.     

Supplementary growth hormone treatment of women with poor ovarian response to exogenous gonadotrophins: changes in serum and follicular fluid insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3)

The effects of supplementary growth hormone (GH) treatment uponinsulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), IGF binding protein-3(IGFBP-3) concentrations in serum and ovarian follicular fluidwere investigated in women undergoing buserelin human menopausalgonadotrophin (HMG) ovulation induction for in-vitro fertilization.Women (n = 40), aged 24–39 (mean 35 years), who showedpoor ovarian responses to HMG, were recruited and randomly dividedinto two groups. Each patient received two cycles of ovulationinduction, one with GH (12 IU/day x 12 days/HMG/buserelin) andanother with placebo/HMG. Serum IGF-1 increased substantiallyduring the GH treatment and remained significantly higher thanthe control 2 days after the last GH injection. Serum IGFBP-3fell steadily during the placebo/HMG treatment and to a nadiron the day of oocyte retrieval (P <0.05 compared to serumbefore any treatment). In contrast, IGFBP-3 was increased (P<0.01) during the GH administration and returned to the controllevel 2 days after GH injection. Serum oestradiol concentrationson the eighth day of HMG and the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG) were not significantly different between the two groups.Serum IGF-1 was highly correlated with IGFBP-3 before any treatment(r = 0.433, P < 0.001). This correlation disappeared afterbuserelin, placebo/HMG treatment in the control group, but itwas maintained during GH/HMG treatment (r = 0.343, P = 0.04).Follicular fluid concentrations of GH and IGF-1, not IGFBP-3or oestradiol, were significantly elevated in the GH-treatedwomen. Serum IGF-1 on the day of oocyte retrieval was highlycorrelated to the follicular fluid IGF-1 in both groups. Therelationships between the follicular fluid GH and IGF-1 werecompletely opposite in the two groups, being positive in thecontrol group and negative in the GH-treated group. In the controlgroup, significant correlations were found between follicularfluid concentrations of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3, and GH and IGFBP-3which were not found in the GH-treated group. There were nocorrelations found between follicular fluid concentrations ofGH or IGF-1 or IGFBP-3 and oestradiol. The results clearly demonstratethat the normal GH, IGF-1, IGFBP-3 relationships can be alteredby treatments which influence the ovarian—pituitary axis;the significance of such changes to ovulation remains to bediscovered.     

Endocrinology: A randomized prospective study of gonadotrophin with or without gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist for treatment of unexplained infertility

The use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) incombination with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for ovulationinduction has been advocated for the treatment, particularlyby in-vitro fertilization (IVF) of various types of infertility.The present study was designed to compare the clinical efficacyof HMG alone with a short protocol of GnRHa/HMG for treatmentof unexplained infertility. A total of 91 couples with unexplainedinfertility were randomly assigned to one of two treatments;either HMG with intra-uterine insemination (IUI) (45 patients,62 cycles) or GnRHa/HMG with IUI (46 patients, 69 cycles) treatments.Progesterone concentrations on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG) administration were significantly higher in HMG (1.5 ±0.9 ng/ml) versus GnRHa/HMG (0.8 ± 0.6 ng/ml; P <0.05)cycles. Furthermore, GnRHa suppressed the occurrences ofpremature luteinization (GnRHa/HMG 5.8% and HMG 24.2% respectively).However, there were no significant differences in HMG dose requirements,plasma oestradiol concentrations or follicular development onthe day of HCG administration between the two groups. Nor wereany significant differences found in the pregnancy rates betweenthe two treatment protocols (GnRHa/HMG 13.0% and HMG 11.3% respectively).Our results suggest no beneficial effect of GnRHa/HMG comparedto HMG alone for the treatment of unexplained infertility, basedon pregnancy rates.     

Endocrinology: Daily measurements and in-vitro effects of human chorionic gonadotrophin in the early luteal phase

The purpose of the present study was to analyse daily measurementsof human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) in in-vitro fertilization(IVF) cycles and to reproduce the effects of HCG in vitro usinghuman granulosa—luteinized cells from the same patients.The study population consisted of nine women undergoing IVFbecause of tubal infertility in whom blood was drawn every 24h from the day of the ovulatory dose of HCG (10 000 IU) until6 days after ovum pick-up. Granulosa—luteal cells fromthe follicular aspirates were collected and cultured in vitroup to 6 days in the presence of increasing concentrations (0,0.01, 0.1, 1.0 and 100.0 IU/ml) of HCG. Serum progesterone andHCG in vivo as well as progesterone accumulation in vitro ondays 2, 4 and 6, were the main outcome measures. Maximum HCGconcentrations (0.25 IU/ml) were reached the day before ovumpick-up, and continuously decreased until day 6 after ovum retrieval.HCG did not stimulate progesterone production in vitro at anydose tested until day 6 after ovum pick-up. Then, 0.01 IU/mlresulted significantly (P < 0.05) stimulatory compared tocontrols, while 1.0 IU/ml was inhibitory (P < 0.05). It isconcluded that HCG supplementation in an IVF cycle is unnecessaryuntil day 6 after ovum pick-up. On day 6, progesterone productionis stimulated with very low concentrations of HCG.     

Endocrinology: Inhibition of ovarian-derived prorenin to angiotensin cascade in the treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether useof the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, enalapril,would prevent the occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome(OHSS) in the rabbit model. A total of 20 adult female New Zealandwhite rabbits were studied. All rabbits received 75 IU of humanmenopausal gonadotrophin s.c. each day for 7 days. On day 8,all rabbits received 2500 IU of human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG). Ten rabbits were randomly chosen to receive enalaprilorally. Five received 1 mg/kg of enalapril and five received2 mg/kg of enalapril twice daily. The remainder received placeboorally twice daily. On day 10, all rabbits underwent surgicalexploration. Total body weight was found to increase significantlyin the placebo group (by 293 g, P < 0.001) but not in eithergroup receiving enalapril. Haematocrit also increased significantlyin the placebo group (by 3%, P < 0.013) but not in the enalaprilgroups. Ovarian weights were highest for the 2 mg/kg enalaprilgroup (5.80 ± 0.52 g), followed by the 1 mg/kg enalaprilgroup (3.64 ± 0.45), and least for the placebo group(2.69 ± 0.17). All 10 placebo rabbits met criteria forsevere OHSS whereas only six in the enalapril groups did. Weconcluded that angiotensin II may play a significant role inthe development of weight gain, third space fluid accumulationand intravascular fluid depletion in OHSS. ACE inhibition resultedin a 40% decrease in the incidence of OHSS in the rabbit model.     

Ovarian stimulation with buserelin/HMG/HCG: prospective randomized study of short versus long protocol

The combined administration of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone(GnRH) agonist buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG) was evaluated in 527 cycles (428 patients) of an assistedreproduction programme. All women were randomly allocated accordingto the ovulation induction protocol into two groups: group I(short protocol; 318 cycles) was given buserelin (1 mg/day)intranasally from cycle day 1 and HMG (2 ampoules/day) fromday 3 until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration:group H (long protocol; 209 cycles) was given buserelin (1 mg/day)intranasally from cycle day 1 for at least 14 days and then2 ampoules HMG/day were added, increasing progressively accordingto the ovarian response. The number (mean ± SEM) of folliclesdeveloped was higher in group II than in group I (9.1 ±0.4 versus 7.7 ± 0.3, respectively; P < 0.05). Moreoocytes were retrieved in group II (8.4 ± 0.5) than ingroup I (6.5 ± 0.3) (P < 0.001), as well as more embryos(6.3 ± 0.5 and 4.0 ± 0.3, respectively; P <0.001). Moreover, in group II there was a better correlationbetween oestradiol and the total follicular volume (r = 0.5391)on cycle day 0 compared with group I (r = 0.458), while oestradiolvalues were similar between the two groups. No differences wereobserved in the cancellation rate, fertilization rate and maturityof the oocytes between the two groups. The pregnancy rate pertransfer was slightly better in group II (25.8%) than in groupI (19.4%), but this difference was not significant. More stimulationdays were needed in group II than in group I (11.8 ±0.2 and 10 ± 0.2, respectively) (P < 0.001) and moreHMG ampoules (37.7 ± 1.4 and 27.9 ± 0.1, respectively)(P < 0.001). In conclusion, the administration of the longprotocol is associated with a higher number of follicles developed,oocytes retrieved and embryos obtained, while it seems morepromising concerning the pregnancy rates. Nevertheless, treatmentwith this protocol increases the stimulation days and the numberof HMG ampoules administered and hence the cost.     

Randomized controlled trial of follicle stimulating hormone versus human menopausal gonadotrophin in in-vitro fertilization*

The adverse effect of raised luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrationson reproductive outcome suggests that exogenous LH administrationfor ovarian stimulation may not be desirable. The aim of thisstudy was to compare the clinical pregnancy rates between folliclestimulating hormone (FSH) and human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG) used in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. A total of232 infertile patients, with a mean duration of infertilityof 67.1 ± 32.9 months, were selected for IVF (femaleage <38 years, FSH <15 IU/1, and total motile sperm count>5x10⁶). A short (flare-up) protocol with daily leuprolideacetate was followed randomly from day 3 with FSH (n = 115)or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG; n = 117), at an initialdose of two ampoules per day. A maximum of three embryos wastransferred, and the luteal phase was supported with four dosesof HCG (2500 IU). No differences were observed between the twogroups in any of the cycle response variables except fertilizationrates per oocyte and per patient, both of which were significantlyhigher with FSH. Clinical pregnancy rates per cycle initiated,per oocyte retrieval and per embryo transfer were 19.1, 21.0and 22.7% respectively for FSH, and 12.0, 12.8 and 15.4% respectivelyfor HMG. Whilst these differences were not statistically significant,the results of this interim analysis suggest that HMG may beassociated with a lower clinical pregnancy rate than FSH.     

The effects of the somatostatin analogue octreotide on ovulatory performance in women with polycystic ovaries

The elevated luteinizing hormone (LH) and androgen concentrationscharacteristic of women with polycystic ovaries (PCO) are consideredcrucial factors in their infertility. The somatostatin analogueoctreotide lowers LH and androgen concentrations in women withPCO. The effects of octreotide given concurrently with humanmenopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) were therefore compared withthat of HMG alone in 28 infertile women with PCO resistant toclomiphene. In 56 cycles of combined HMG and octreotide therapythere was more orderly follicular growth compared with the multiplefollicular development observed in 29 cycles in which HMG wasgiven alone (mean number of follicles > 15 mm diameter onthe day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration:2.5 ± 0.2 and 3.6 ± 0.4 respectively; P = 0.026).There was a significantly reduced number of cycles abandoned(>4 follicles > 15 mm diameter on day of HCG) in patientstreated with octreotide + HMG, so that HCG had to be withheldin only 5.4% of cycles compared to 24.1% with HMG alone (P <0.05). The incidence of hyperstimulation was also lower on combinedtreatment. Octreotide therapy resulted in a more ‘appropriate’hormonal milieu at the time of HCG injection, with lower LH,oestradiol, androstenedione and insulin concentrations. Althoughgrowth hormone concentration was similar on both regimens, significantlyhigher insulin growth factor-I concentrations were observedon the day of HCG in women on combined therapy than on HMG alone.     

EndocrinologyHormonal profile during the follicular phase in cycles stimulated with a combination of human menopausal gonadotrophin and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrorelix)

A third-generation gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist(Cetrorelix) was used during ovarian stimulation in 32 patientsundergoing assisted reproduction, in order to prevent the prematureluteinizing hormone (LH) surge. In all patients, ovarian stimulationwas carried out with two or three ampoules of human menopausalgonadotrophin (HMG), starting on day 2 of the menstrual cycle.In addition, 0.5 mg of Cetrorelix was administered daily fromday 6 of HMG treatment until the day of ovulation inductionby human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). A significant drop inplasma LH concentration was observed within a few hours of thefirst administration of Cetrorelix (P<0.005). Moreover, noLH surge was detected at any point in the treatment period inany of the 32 patients. A mean oestradiol concentration of 2122±935ng/1 was observed on the day of the HCG administration, indicatingnormal folliculogenesis. Like LH, progesterone concentrationalso dropped within a few hours of the first administrationof Cetrorelix (P< 0.005). A 0.5 mg daily dose of Cetrorelixprevented a premature LH surge in all the 32 patients treated.     

Endocrinology: Progesterone alone versus progesterone combined with HCG as luteal support in GnRHa/HMG induced IVF cycles: a randomized clinical trial

Two different regimens of luteal support in gonadotrophin hormone-releasinghormone (GnRH) analoguefhuman menopausal gonadotrophin (GnRHa/HMG)-inducedin-vitro fertilization cycles (IVF) were compared in a randomizedclinical trial. After embryo transfer, either vaginal progesteronealone was administered (n=89, P group), or a combination ofvaginal progesterone and human chorionic gonadotrophin (n=87,P/HCG group). The primary aim of this study was to assess theeffect of the different regimens of luteal support on the pregnancyrate. The secondary aim was to compare oestradiol and progesteroneconcentrations in the luteal phase between the two groups, andassess their effect on the pregnancy rate. A clinical pregnancyrate of 15% was found in the P/HCG group in comparison with26% in the P group (odds ratio 0.49; 99% confidence interval:0.18–1.3). The luteal serum oestradiol and progesteronevalues in the P/HCG group were significantly higher when comparedwith the P group on the 6th, 9th and 12th day after oocyte retrieval(Wilcoxon P<0.001). In accordance with the high oestradiolconcentrations, more cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome(OHSS) were found in the P/HCG group. Oestradiol values on the9th day after oocyte retrieval, presumably the day of implantation,appeared to be higher in women who did not become clinicallypregnant. We conclude that vaginal progesterone alone providessufficient luteal support in GnRHa/HMG induced IVF cycles. Thecombination of vaginal progesterone and HCG as luteal supportleads to significant high luteal oestradiol and progesteroneconcentrations. But a high concentration of oestradiol seemsto have a deleterious effect on the implantation process, resultingin a low pregnancy rate.     

Pregnancy: Endometrial ultrasonography as a predictor of pregnancy in an in-vitro fertilization programme

The endometrial pattern and thickness were analysed by ultrasonographyin 139 cycles stimulated for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) onthe day of administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG).A semi-programmed schedule based on the pill + clomiphene citrate+ human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) was used in all cycles.On the day of HCG administration, endometrial pattern and thicknesswere assessed with an Ultramark 4 (ATL) ultrasound equippedwith a 5 MHz vaginal probe. Endometrial pattern I (a ‘tripleline’multilayer) was observed in a total of 105 cycles (76%), andpattern II (fully homogeneous and hyperechogenic in relationto myometrial tissue) in 34 (24%). The incidence of clinicalpregnancy did not differ (P = 0.52) between the groups withendometrial patterns I (23.8%) and II (29.4%). Endometrial thicknesson the day of HCG administration in the group with pattern I(8.4 ± 1.9 mm) was similar (P = 0.96) to that observedin the group with pattern II (8.4 ± 2.0 mm). In addition,the endometrial thickness of the patients who became pregnant(8.0 ± 1.7 mm) did not differ (P = 0.15) from that ofwomen who did not achieve pregnancy (8.6 ± 2.0 mm). Theconclusion from the present data is that ultrasonographic analysisof endometrial thickness and refringency on the day of HCG administrationhad no predictive value for conception in IVF cycles.     

Endocrinology: A comparison of two starting doses of human menopausal gonadotrophin for follicle stimulation in unselected patients for in-vitro fertilization

Ovarian responses and embryology data were compared in patientsundergoing in-vitro fertilization following follicular stimulationusing long course gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue/humanmenopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) in which the initial daily dosewas two (150 IU) or three ampoules (225 IU) maintained for aminimum of 7 days. Group 1 (n = 31; centre A) patients weretreated with a starting dose of two ampoules, while group 2(n = 46; centre A) patients were treated chronologically immediatelybefore group 1 with a starting dose of three ampoules per day.Group 3 (n = 74; centre B) patients were treated with threeampoules per day simultaneously with group 1. There was no differencein the distributions of patient ages or reasons for treatmentbetween the three groups. Group 1 required longer treatmentbefore the plasma oestradiol attained 250 pg/ml than did boththe other groups (group 1, 9.0; group 2, 6.9; group 3, 6.7 days;P < 0.01), and this resulted in a longer follicular phasefor group 1 (mean: 14.5 days compared with 12.7 and 12.8 forgroups 2 and 3 respectively; P < 0.05). The numbers of follicles>16 mm in diameter at human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG)administration and the numbers of eggs and embryos were allsignificantly lower (P < 0.04) in group 1, and cycle cancellationsdue to insufficient ovarian responses were higher (P < 0.02)in group 1. There was no difference in the numbers of ampoulesused, the oestradiol concentration at HCG, the fertilizationand pregnancy rates or the incidence of hyperstimulation syndromein the three groups. The lower starting dose, therefore, yieldedinferior responses without significant reduction in the HMGrequirement.     

Subcutaneous low dose leuprolide acetate depot versus leuprolide acetate for women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization

A total of 100 women undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophin-releasinghormone agonist (GnRHa) and a human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG) for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) participated in thisrandomized comparative study. Leuprolide acetate at a dose of0.5 mg/day s.c. (n = 52, group I), or low-dose leuprolide acetatedepot at a dose of 1.88 nig s.c. (n = 48, group II), was startedon days 21–23 of the cycle. Stimulation with 225 IU/dayHMG was started after pituitary desensitization had been achieved.The luteal phase was supported by human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG) i.m. injection. There were nostatistical differences inbaseline oestradiol (24.5 ± 4.8 versus 21.9 ±4.5 pg/ml) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations(3.9 ± 1.9 versus 3.2 $ 1.8 mlU/ml), and concentrationson the day of HCG administration of oestradiol (1657 ±245 versus 1512$165 pg/ml), luteinizing hormone (LH; 6.2 ±4.8 versus 5.6 ± 4.3 mlU/ml) and FSH (10.6 ± 2.8versus 10.8 ± 3.6 mIU/ml). There were also no statisticaldifferences in the HMG dosage (26.8 ± 1.8 versus 28.5± 1.5), the number of oocytes retrieved (7.6 ±3.0 versus 8.1 ± 4.3), the number of oocytes fertilized(5.3 ± 2.1 versus 5.6 ± 3.0) and the number ofembryos transferred (3.5 ± 1.3 versus 3.4 ± 1.6).There was no evidence of a premature LH surge in either group,but two patients appeared to have a poor response in the leuprolideacetate group (group I). There were 11 pregnancies (21.2%) afterthe use of leuprolide acetate and 12 pregnancies (25.0%) inthose given leuprolide acetate depot; no statistical differenceexisted between these two groups. Thus, an s.c. low-dose leuprolideacetate depot injection may offer a useful alternative for pituitarysuppression in ovarian stimulation for IVF.     

Sequential clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin for ovulation induction: comparison to clomiphene citrate alone and human menopausal gonadotrophin alone

The need for frequent injections and monitoring, the possibilityof multiple gestations, and the higher cost compared to clomiphenecitrate, prevents many clinicians from using human menopausalgonadotrophin (HMG) for ovulation induction. A sequential medicationregimen, in which HMG is taken after clomiphene, overcomes theseproblems. We retrospectively compared per cycle fecundity andbirth rates in 119 cycles of clomiphene—HMG, 524 cyclesof clomiphene alone, 57 cycles of HMG alone, and 79 cycles ofconcurrent HMG and clomiphene in patients receiving intra-uterineinsemination (IUI), who were free of endometriosis or tubaldisease. Per cycle fecundity for clomiphene—HMG was 22%[95% confidence interval (CI) 12–34%], double that ofclomiphene alone (11%) (95% CI 8–14%) (P < 0.01), andequal to HMG alone (18%) (95% CI 7–29%) or HMG and clomiphenetogether (19%) (95% CI 10–28%). The multiple birth ratefor clomiphene—HMG (7/21) equalled that for HMG alone(3/12) and HMG and clomiphene together (3/8). The average numberof ampoules of HMG required [follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)75 mIU, luteinizing hormone (LH) 75 mIU] was decreased by 65%from 24.5 ± 1.0 for HMG or HMG and clomiphene togetherto 8.6 ± 0.3 for clomiphene—HMG (P < 0.001).Per cycle fecundity was identical when one, two or three ampoulesof HMG per day were administered after clomiphene. We concludethat ovulation induction with sequential clomiphene—HMGresults in fecundity double that of clomiphene alone and equalto HMG alone or concurrent with clomiphene, thereby reducingthe requirement for HMG.     

Relationship of biochemical pregnancy to pre-ovulatory endometrial thickness and pattern in patients undergoing ovulation induction

In order to assess the relationship between pre-ovulatory endometrialthickness and pattern and biochemical pregnancy, the pregnancyoutcome was retrospectively analysed in 81 patients undergoingovulation induction evaluated by vaginal ultrasound on the dayof human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration or luteinizinghormone (LH) surge. Biochemical pregnancies occurred in 7/32(21.9%) pregnancies when endometrial thickness was <9 mm,compared to 0/49 when endometrial thickness was 9 mm on theday of HCG administration or LH surge (P < 0.0025). Clinicalabortions occurred in 5/32 (15.6%) pregnancies when endometrialthickness was 6–8 mm, compared to 6/49 (12.2%) when endometrialthickness was 6–8 mm (NS). Endometrial thickness was relatedto the cycle day of HCG or LH surge (r = 0.37, P < 0.001)but was unrelated to oestradiol level on the day of HCG administrationor LH surge (r = 0.12). Biochemical pregnancies were relatedto endometrial pattern (r = – 0.22, P = 0.02) but wereunrelated to maternal age or previous abortions. Clinical abortionswere related to age (r = 0.26, P = 0.01) and to previous abortion(r = 0.25, P = 0.013) but were unrelated to endometrial pattern.Neither biochemical pregnancy nor clinical abortion was relatedto oestradiol or LH levels on the day of HCG administrationor LH surge. These findings suggest that the majority of biochemicalpregnancies do not result from karyotypically abnormal embryos,as do clinical abortions.     

Endocrinology: Growth hormone, oestradiol, progesterone and testosterone concentrations in follicular fluid after ovarian stimulation with various regimes for assisted reproduction

Follicular fluid samples and oocytes were obtained from 75 women(87 cycles), who participated in an assisted conception programme.Determinations of the concentration of oestradiol, progesterone,testosterone and growth hormone were performed in all follicularfluid samples. Patients were stimulated with the following regimes:group A (24 cycles, 94 samples), human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG) (three ampoules/day) and human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG); group B (23 cycles, 53 samples), HMG/HCG with prednisolone(7.5 mg/day) after cycle programming with oral contraceptives;group C (40 cycles, 60 samples), buserelin with HMG/HCG. Oestradiolconcentrations (mean ± SEM) were significantly higher(P < 0.05) in group A (320.1 ± 27.3 ng/ ml) and thoseof growth hormone in both groups A and C (3.8 ± 0.2 and3.2 ± 0.15 ng/ml, respectively), as compared to the othergroups, whereas progesterone and testosterone concentrationswere similar in all groups. The mean concentrations of oestradiol,progesterone, testosterone and growth hormone were significantlyhigher (P < 0.01) in follicular fluid with oocytes of intermediatematurity than with mature oocytes (382.5 ng/ml, 7847.5 ng/ml,1704.5 ng/dl and 3.7 ng/ml versus 217.8 ng/ml, 5488.4 ng/ml,1313.6 ng/dl and 2.7 ng/ml, respectively). On the other hand,only oestradiol concentrations were significantly higher infollicular fluid of fertilized compared to non-fertilized oocytes.Concentrations of the other hormones analysed, except growthhormone, were similar in follicular fluid from pregnant andnon-pregnant women after assisted reproduction. Growth hormone,on the other hand, was significantly lower (P < 0.05) infollicular fluid from pregnant compared to non-pregnant women(2.8 versus 3.5 ng/ml). It is concluded that intermediate maturityoocytes and oocytes which will be subsequently fertilized arefound in follicles with higher follicular fluid concentrationsof growth hormone and steroids. Moreover, oocytes leading topregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer arederived from follicles with lower growth hormone concentrationsin follicular fluid.     

Triggering of ovulation in human menopausal gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles: comparison between intravenously administered gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (100 and 500 {micro}g), GnRH agonist (buserelin, 500 {micro}g) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (10 000 IU)

We studied the peri-ovulatory and luteal phases in 38 humanmenopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)-stimulated cycles, in which ovulationwas triggered with four different i.v. bolus ovulation triggers:100 µg gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH; group A,n = 9), 500 µg GnRH agonist (GnRHa; group B, n = 10),10 000IU human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; group C, n = 10)and 500 µg GnRH (group D, n = 9). Endogenous luteinizinghormone (LH) surges occurred in all cycles of groups A, B andD. The rise was slowest but highest in group B (P < 0.0001)and lowest in group A. Although the t₀ serum oestradiol valueswere similar in all groups, day +8 oestradiol and day +4 and+8 progesterone concentrations were higher in group C (P <0.05). At day +4 and +8, serum LH concentrations were lowest(P < 0.01) but follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrationswere higher. Clinically, day +8 luteal scores showed a moreconspicuous degree of ovarian hyperstimulation in the HCG group(P = 0.0292). Luteal insufficiency, defined as cycles with progesteroneconcentrations of <8 ng/ml, occurred much more frequentlyin groups A, B and D than in group C (day +4: P < 0.0003;day +8: P < 0.0001), despite progesterone supplementation.Three pregnancies (one in group C and two in group D) and onemoderate case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (ina non-conceptional group D cycle) occurred. These findings showthat (i) ovulation occurs and pregnancy can be achieved followingan endogenous LH surge induced by GnRH and its agonists, (ii)a high frequency of luteal insufficiency occurs in such cycleseven with luteal supplementation and (iii) OHSS cannot be totallyprevented by this approach, although cycles with an endogenousLH surge in general result in fewer subclinical signs of ovarianhyperstimulation.     

Accumulation of human chorionic gonadotrophin in the serum of patients during in-vitro fertilization treatment cycles with Pergonal

We examined the possible contribution of human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG) in Pergonal to the serum luteinizing hormone (LH)-likebioactivity in 10 patients (median age32 years, range 28–38)with tubal infertility who were undergoing in-vitro fertilization(IVF), together with 19 controls (median age30 years, range21–43). IVF patients were treated with clomiphene (50mg twice daily) over days 2–6 and Pergonal (150 IU i.m.)daily from day 5 until at least day 10. Serum LH was measuredby fluoro-immunometric assay (I-LH) and in-vitro Leydig cellbioassay (B-LH). Serum HCG was measured by fluoro-immunometricassay. The data were analysed by paired two-tailed t-test, followinglogarithmic transformation. From days 1–5, there was anincrease in serum B-LH (mean, 95% confidence intervals givenin parentheses) from 8.3 (6.8, 10.2) IU/1 to 11.7 (9.8, 13.9)IU/1 [P= 0.004], and in serum I-LH from 4.5 (3.7, 5.4) IU/1to 5.4 (4.6, 6.3) IU/1 [P= 0.002]. From days 5–8, therewas a rise in B-LH to 16.6 (12.6, 21.9) IU/1 [P= 0.023]. Therise in I-LH to 6.3 (5.1, 7.8) IU/1 [P= 0.081] failed to reachsignificance. Furthermore, serum HCG was <<0.75 IU/1 untilafter Pergonal was administered on day 5, then rose to a plateauon day 8 at 1.2(0.8, 1.6) IU/1. Serum HCG in the controls remained<<0.75 IU/1 throughout. We conclude there is a disproportionateincrease in serum B-LH compared to I-LH from days 5–8,corresponding with a rise in serum HCG and the commencementof treatment with Pergonal. The HCG in Pergonal may be contributingto an undesirable rise in serum LH-like bioactivity, which mightreduce the success rate of IVF.     

Human prolactin release induced by follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone and human chorionic gonadotrophin

Plasma prolactin levels rise in stimulated cycles. To clarifythe effects of gonadotrophin on the lactotrophs, three studieswere performed. First, plasma concentrations of prolactin duringclomiphene citrate (CC)-human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)-humanchononic gonadotrophin (HCG) treatment of women enrolled forin-vitro fertilization (IYF) were compared with those duringHMG-HCG administration while under pituitary suppression witha gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue (buserelin).Women suppressed with buserelin had higher basal levels of PRLin plasma (14.4 ± 4.3 nglml versus 6.9 ± 1.4 ng/ml,P<0.001). Only buserelin-suppressed women showed a significantrise in plasma prolactin before HCG administration, while bothpatient groups had marked prolactin peaks after HCG injection.This peak was higher in the buserelin group (71.9 ± 50.7ng/ml versus 52.6 ± 29.7 ng/ml). The second study showedthat plasma levels of prolactin of 6 post- menopausal womenwere significantly increased 48 h after an injection of 5000IU HCG, i.m. (24.9 ± 17.4 ng/ml versus 12.4 ±6.2 ng/ml P<0.05). Third, plasma prolactin was studied in5 women over 30 days after surgical castration. An upward trendwas observed similar to that of endogenous gonadotrophin, withthe change in prolactin values closely correlating with thechange in concentrations of follicule stimulating hormone (P<0.005).All these findings suggest that human gonadotrophins stimulatelactotrophs.