Visual outcomes of binocular implantation of a new extended depth of focus intraocular lens

Purpose:To evaluate the visual outcomes of bilateral implantation of a new hydrophobic foldable extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL.Methods:All cases undergoing phacoemulsification with bilateral implantation of Supraphob Infocus IOL between December 2017 and July 2018 at a tertiary eye care center were recruited in this prospective interventional study. The primary outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA). Postoperative follow-up was done on day 1, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months.Results:One hundred and four eyes of 52 patients with a mean age of 58.4 ± 9.3 years were included. The mean UDVA improved from 0.84 ± 0.32 logMAR preoperatively to 0.11 ± 0.08 logMAR at 3 months following surgery. At the final follow-up, the binocular UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA was 0.03 ± 0.07, 0.14 ± 0.06, and 0.36 ± 0.05 logMAR, respectively. The mean CS was 1.47 ± 0.06 logCS. The distance and near stereopsis was 90.2 ± 24.8 s of arc (arcsec) and 62.5 ± 19.4 arcsec, respectively. The mean total higher-order aberration (HOA), point spread function, and modulation transfer function were 0.30 ± 0.13, 0.07 ± 0.08, and 0.26 ± 0.07, respectively.Conclusion:The Supraphob Infocus EDOF IOL provides good unaided visual acuity for distance, intermediate, and near along with a high quality of vision as assessed by contrast sensitivity, HOAs, and stereoacuity. It may be a potential alternative to the currently available EDOF IOLs in providing good visual acuity at variable distances.     

三种不同IOL植入术后短期的视力和视觉干扰现象及脱镜率的对比

目的：对比分析单眼植入三焦点、多焦点及连续视程人工晶状体(IOL)术后短期的视力、视觉干扰现象及脱镜率。方法：回顾性分析2019-03/2022-12行超声乳化白内障吸除联合IOL植入术的白内障患者67例67眼。35例35眼植入Symfony连续视程IOL； 21例21眼植入AcrySof IQ ReSTOR+3D多焦点IOL； 11例11眼植入AcrySof IQ PanOptix三焦点IOL。记录术前及术后3 mo裸眼远视力(UDVA)、中视力(UIVA)、近视力(UNVA)，术后3 mo离焦曲线、视觉干扰现象及脱镜率。结果：术后3 mo，三组间UDVA无差异(P>0.05)； Symfony组及PanOptix组UIVA优于ReSTOR组(均P<0.01)； ReSTOR组及PanOptix组UNVA优于Symfony组(均P<0.01)。离焦曲线显示，在中视力区间(-1.00--1.50 D)，Symfony组视力优于ReSTOR组(P<0.05)； 在近视力区间(-2.50--3.50 D)，ReSTOR组视力优于Symfony组(P<0.05)； PanOptix组在近视力区间(-2.00--3.50 D)的视力优于Symfony组(P<0.05)，同时在中视力区间(-1.00--2.00 D)的视力优于ReSTOR组(P<0.05)。三组间眩光或光晕的发生率及双眼相互干扰现象发生率均无差异(P>0.05)。PanOptix组和ReSTOR组脱镜率比Symfony组高(P<0.0167)。结论：与Symfony连续视程IOL和ReSTOR多焦点IOL相比，PanOptix三焦点IOL能够兼顾远中近视力，眩光和光晕发生率不高，脱镜率较高； 单眼植入老视矫正型IOL仍需慎重。     

Clinical outcomes after femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery with implantation of the TECNIS Symfony intraocular lens

AIM: To evaluate the clinical outcomes in terms of vision across distances (near, intermediate, and far), contrast sensitivity and subjective patient satisfaction after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with implantation of an extended range of vision (ERV) intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: Forty patients (55 eyes) undergoing bilateral or monocular FLACS with implantation of the ERV IOL TECNIS Symfony (Johnson & Johnson Vision) were enrolled. Uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA) and near visual acuities (UNVA) were evaluated at 3mo after surgery, as well the defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, patient satisfaction and spectacle independence. RESULTS: No severe complications occurred. All eyes showed a central position of the IOL in the capsular bag without tilting at 3mo after surgery. 3mo postoperative mean logMAR visual acuity at 5 m, 67 cm and 40 cm were -0.04 ±0.08, -0.17±0.22, 0.37±0.17, respectively. All patients obtained satisfactory UDVA and UIVA, as well as functional UNVA, meeting the needs of daily life. Spectacle independence rate was 94.55%. Contrast sensitivity results did not differ from those obtained with monofocal aspheric lenses. Likewise, no moderate and severe photic phenomena were reported. Mean patient satisfaction scores with distance, intermediate and near vision were 9.0, 9.0, and 7.0, respectively. CONCLUSION: FLACS with implantation of the ERV IOL TECNIS Symfony provides a successful visual restoration at far, intermediate distance and a functional-range near vision acuity, with minimal level of disturbing photic phenomena, and high rates of spectacle independence and patient satisfaction.     

连续视程IOL植入术后患者主观视觉质量及阅读能力的临床观察

目的:比较双眼及单眼植入Tecnis Symfony连续视程人工晶状体(IOL)术后患者主观视觉质量、阅读流畅性及术后满意度的差异.方法:对我院48例71眼行白内障超声乳化吸除联合IOL植入术的患者进行回顾性分析,根据植入IOL类型不同分为2组,其中23例46眼双眼植入Symfony IOL为双眼组,25例25眼一眼植...     

飞秒激光辅助白内障联合TECNIS Symfony人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量的评价

目的：通过观察飞秒激光辅助的白内障手术联合TECNIS Symfony连续视程人工晶状体植入术后远中近全程视力、对比敏感度,主观满意度,综合评价TECNIS Symfony人工晶状体植入术后患者的视觉质量。

方法：收集我院目前已实施40例55眼飞秒激光辅助白内障联合TECNIS Symfony 连续视程人工晶状体植入术资料,检测术后3mo裸眼远视力(5 m)、中视力(67 cm)及近视力(40 cm),绘制离焦曲线,根据多焦晶体满意度调查表并计算脱镜率。

结果：所有患者术中术后无严重并发症发生。术后3mo,所有患者人工晶状体位置居中,无明显偏位或倾斜。术后3mo, 5 m、67 cm、40 cm平均裸眼LogMAR视力分别为：-0.04±0.08, -0.17±0.22, 0.37±0.17。总体脱镜率95%。不同空间频率的对比敏感度较普通单焦非球面人工晶状体无明显下降。无中等或严重光学干扰现象发生。远中近各功能区满意度评分分别为9.0,9.0,7.0分。

结论：飞秒激光辅助的白内障手术联合TECNIS Symfony连续视程人工晶状体植入术后可获得满意的远中裸眼视力和基本满足日常生活的近视力,术后光学干扰少,脱镜率高,患者满意度高。     

连续视程与三焦点人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量的比较

目的：比较Tecnis Symfony连续视程人工晶状体与Zeiss三焦点人工晶状体(At Lisa tri 839MP)植入术后患者视觉质量的差异。

方法：选取2019-01/2020-12于我院行白内障超声乳化吸除联合人工晶状体植入术的患者42例53眼,其中A组22例29眼植入Tecnis Symfony连续视程人工晶状体,B组20例24眼植入Zeiss三焦点人工晶状体。观察两组患者术后3mo时远中近视力,绘制离焦曲线,并评估生活质量,记录并发症发生情况。

结果：术后3mo,两组患者视力均明显改善,两组患者裸眼远(5m)、中(80cm)距离视力及最佳矫正远距离视力(5m)无差异(均P>0.05),但B组患者裸眼中(60cm)、近(40cm)距离视力优于A组(均P<0.05)。术后3mo绘制离焦曲线示A组在+1.0～-2.0D段跨度平稳形成平台期; B组在0、-2.5D处形成两个波峰; 0D处两组远视力无显著差异(P>0.05),-2.5、-3.5D处B组近视力显著优于A组(均P<0.01)。两组患者术后脱镜率均在90%以上,均出现不同程度眩光、光晕等光学现象,但生活质量总体满意度较高,A组阅读速度明显高于B组,且夜间视物满意度较高(均P<0.05)。

结论：两种类型人工晶状体植入术后脱镜率均在90%以上,可为患者提供兼顾远、中、近的全程视力,Symfony连续视程人工晶状体植入术后流畅阅读及夜间视物满意度较高; Zeiss三焦点人工晶状体植入术后近距离视力更好,更适合近距离工作者。     

三种人工晶状体植入术后静态视力和动态视力的评估及比较

目的：对三焦点、双焦点及连续视程人工晶状体植入术后的单眼视力和动态视力（DVA）进行评估及比较。方法：前瞻性临床研究。选取2020年1月至2021年1月于重庆医科大学附属第一医院眼科行白内障超声乳化摘除联合人工晶状体植入且资料完整的白内障患者65例（81眼）。根据所选择的IOL 类型分为3组：双焦点组33眼,植入Tecnis ZMB00 IOL;三焦点组20眼,植入AT Lisatri.839MP IOL;EDOF组28眼,植入Tecnis ZXR00 IOL。术后3个月分别检测每眼的裸眼静态视力（SVA）：包括裸眼远视力（UDVA）、裸眼中视力（UIVA）、裸眼近视力（UNVA）（LogMAR视力）。采用运动视标法检测裸眼DVA（检测速度分别为4、8、12、24fps）：包括裸眼动态远视力（UDDVA)、裸眼动态中视力（UIDVA）、裸眼动态近视力（UNVA）（LogMAR视力）,并进行评估比较。通过“手抓尺子试验”检测患者反应速度。数据采用卡方检验、方差分析、Kruskal-WallisH检验进行统计分析。结果：3组的总体UDVA、UNVA差异均无统计学意义;3组的总体UIVA差异有统计学意义（H=23.13,P<0.001）,进一步两两比较发现EDOF组优于双焦点组（P<0.001）;三焦点组优于双焦点组（P=0.016）;EDOF 组与三焦点组差异无统计学意义。3组的总体UDDVA在4、8fps时差异均无统计学意义;而在12、24fps时总体差异均有统计学意义（H=10.96,P=0.004;H=11.52,P=0.003）,进一步比较发现双焦点组优于三焦点组（H=-16.21,P=0.003;H=-17.98,P=0.004）,EDOF组优于三焦点组（H=-12.67,P=0.030;H=-16.48,P=0.009）,双焦点组与EDOF组差异无统计学意义。3组的总体UIDVA在8fps 时差异无统计学意义,而在4、12、24fps时差异均有统计学意义（H=8.17~11.36,P<0.05）：4、12fps 时,EDOF组优于双焦点组（H=14.61,P=0.013;H=14.52,P=0.009）,与三焦点组差异无统计学意义;24fps时,EDOF组优于双焦点组、三焦点组（H=15.31,P=0.008;H=-16.60,P=0.027）。3组的总体UNDVA在4、8、12、24fps时差异均有统计学意义（H=11.25~17.61,P<0.05）,且EDOF组均分别优于双焦点组（H=12.71~17.87,P<0.05）和三焦点组（H=-23.04~-15.87,P<0.05）,双焦点组与三焦点组差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。结论：在SVA方面,三焦点IOL及EDOFIOL均可获得较好的UDVA、UIVA、UNVA,而双焦点IOL的UIVA较弱。在DVA方面,远距离、低速度时,3种IOL结果相当;但是近距离、高速度时,EDOFIOL的DVA较其余二者更佳。     

景深延长型人工晶状体Symfony ZXR00的视觉质量研究

目的 评价Symfony ZXR00植入术后患者的视觉质量。设计前瞻性非随机对照研究。研究对象2021年6月至2022年1月于解放军总医院第六医学中心行白内障超声乳化摘除联合IOL植入术的患者42例(42眼),其中植入Symfony ZXR00IOL者18例(18眼),单焦点IOL A1-UV 24例(24眼)。方法比较两组术后3个月视力、对比敏感度、离焦曲线,并对光学干扰现象、脱镜率和视物满意度进行调查和分析。主要指标视力(LogMar)、对比敏感度、离焦曲线、光学干扰现象、脱镜率和视物满意度。结果术后3个月,Symfony组的裸眼远视力(-0.04±0.08)、裸眼中视力(-0.03±0.08)、裸眼近视力(0.28±0.16)、矫正近视力(-0.03±0.05)、矫正远视力下的中视力(-0.04±0.07)、矫正远视力下的近视力(0.27±0.13)显著优于单焦点A1-UV组(0.03±0.10、0.32±0.09、0.39±0.17、-0.01±0.02、0.30±0.11、0.48±0.19),P均<0.05;矫正远视力差异无统计学意义。Symfony组在-2.50 D...     

Optical performance after bilateral implantation of apodized aspheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses with +3.00‐D addition power

Purpose: To determine whether bilateral implantation of an aspheric apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) with +3.00 diopters (D) results in optical adverse effects compared with an aspheric monofocal IOL. Methods: In a prospective, randomized study of 204 eyes (102 patients) with bilateral implantation of an AcrySof ReSTOR SN6AD1 IOL or an AcrySof IQ SN60WF IOL, binocular uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuities (CDVA), uncorrected (UIVA) and distance‐corrected intermediate visual acuities (DCIVA), uncorrected (UNVA) and distance‐corrected near visual acuities (DCNVA), defocus curve, intraocular straylight, wavefront aberrations, modulation transfer functions (MTF) and patient questionnaires were evaluated postoperatively. Results: Both groups resulted in similar UDVA and CDVA (p > 0.05), whereas the multifocal IOL group performed significantly better UIVA and DCIVA at 50, 60 cm, and better UNVA and DCNVA at 40 cm (p ≤ 0.001). Higher intraocular straylight was obtained in the multifocal IOL group (p = 0.016). Total, higher‐order, spherical and coma aberrations performed similar in both groups (p > 0.05). MTF was lower in the multifocal IOL group than in the monofocal IOL group with 3.0‐mm pupils at 5 and 10 cycles per degree (cpd). Although patients in the multifocal IOL group complained more glare/flare, problems with night vision, and halos, they reported excellent spectacle independence, and high satisfaction. Conclusions: Compared with the AcrySof IQ IOL, the ReSTOR SN6AD1 IOL provided excellent visual outcomes, satisfactory spectacle independence without compromising wavefront aberrations; however, optical adverse effects with respect to higher intraocular straylight and lower MTF at lower spatial frequency were demonstrated.     

Comparison on visual function after implantation of an apodized diffractive aspheric multifocal or monofocal intraocular lens

 Purpose: To evaluate visual outcomes after implantation of an aspheric multifocal/ intraocular lens (MIOL) or an aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: This was a prospective nonrandomized study. During 3-months of post-operative follow-up, the following outcomes for SN6AD1 MIOL (multifocal group) and SN60WF IOL (monofocal group) were compared: uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, uncorrected (UNVA) and distance-corrected (DCNVA) near visual acuity, Chinese character near visual acuity, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) under high (100% contrast) and low contrast (10% contrast), UIVA for different IOL powers, and a quality-of-life questionnaire. Results: UNVA, DCNVA, and UIVA under high contrast in the multifocal group were significantly better than those in the monofocal group (P＜0.05). UDVA, CDVA and UIVA under low contrast did not differ between groups at 63 cm and 100 cm (P＞0.05). In most of the cases, Chinese character near visual acuity was significantly better in the multifocal group (P＜0.05). UNVA and UIVA at 63cm were improved 3 months post-operatively. Better UIVA was found in emmetropic and mild myopic eyes as compared to hyperopic ones. The patients in the multifocal group had a higher degree of satisfaction and performed better on near and intermediate tasks, although with greater complaints of visual disturbance.    Conclusion: The SN6AD1 MIOL provides significantly better UNVA, DCNVA and UIVA under high contrast conditions, and better Chinese character near visual acuity. Patients receiving the SN6AD1 MIOL reported a better quality of vision in spite of more serious visual disturbances. Better UIVA was observed in emmetropic and mildly myopic eyes.     

Comparison of an aspheric monofocal intraocular lens with the new generation monofocal lens using defocus curve

Purpose:The aim of this study was to compare the visual outcomes of two monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs), with emphasis on the defocus curve.Methods:A total of 116 consecutive eyes with cataract, undergoing phacoemulsification with IOL implantation were included in the observational case series, and divided into two groups. 71 eyes were implanted with Tecnis Eyhance and 45 with Tecnis 1 monofocal IOL. Eyes with ocular comorbidities, previous ocular surgeries and corneal astigmatism >1 Diopters (D) were excluded from the study. Complete ophthalmic evaluation including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), corrected intermediate visual acuity (CIVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UNVA), corrected near visual acuity (CNVA) was noted and defocus levels ranging from - 4.00 D to + 1.00 D were plotted postoperatively in both groups.Results:Uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) was significantly better in Tecnis Eyhance group compared to Tecnis 1 monofocal. Both the IOLs have similar performance for distance vision but visual acuity at intermediate and near is significantly better with Tecnis Eyhance compared to Tecnis 1 piece IOL.Conclusion:Tecnis Eyhance IOL with its better defocus curve, not only provides good distance, but intermediate vision as well. With significantly better visual acuity across the range of near and intermediate vision, Tecnis Eyhance IOL can prove to be a viable and reasonable option for patients who are more dependent on intermediate vision in daily activities.     

旋转非对称折射型多焦点人工晶状体植入术后早期效果

目的：观察白内障超声乳化联合旋转非对称折射型多焦点人工晶状体（IOL）植入术后患者的早期 效果。方法：前瞻性自身前后对照研究。选择2017年1-12月在武汉爱尔眼科医院行白内障超声乳化联合旋转非对称折射型多焦点IOL植入的患者36例（40眼），术后随访3个月。分别观察裸眼远、中、近视力（LogMAR），矫正远视力（LogMAR），术后等效球镜度（SE），离焦曲线，调制传递函数（MTF），眼内高阶像差，并统计患者术后视功能指数量表评分及脱镜率。数据采用配对t检验和非参数Wilcoxon配对秩和检验。结果：术后3个月裸眼远、中、近视力及矫正远视力均较术前增加（P<0.05），72%裸眼远视力优于0.1，98%矫正远视力优于0.1；88%术后SE在±1.0 D以内；离焦曲线在0.0 D及-2.5 D具有峰值，+1.0～-4.0 D屈光范围内视力均优于0.25。术后3 mm瞳孔直径下MTF数值均较术前提高（P<0.05），眼内总像差、垂直彗差及垂直三叶草较术前增加（P<0.05）。患者术后3个月视功能指数量表得分为1.0（0.0，2.0）。92%的患者看远、看近均可完全脱镜。结论：非对称区域折射型多焦点IOL能提供令人满意的远、近视力，亦能保持较大范围的中距离视力，患者术后具有较好的视觉质量及较高的生活质量。     

A novel standardized test system to evaluate dynamic visual acuity post trifocal or monofocal intraocular lens implantation: a multicenter study

ObjectivesTo compare the dynamic visual acuity (DVA) following implantation of trifocal with monofocal intraocular lenses (IOL) and using a novel test system.MethodsThe present research was a retrospective, multicenter clinical study. Two hundred and ten eyes of 149 patients that underwent cataract phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were enrolled. One hundred and ten eyes of patients received trifocal (AT LISA tri839MP, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany) and 100 eyes received monofocal (Tecnis ZCB00, Abbott, United States) lenses and were evaluated 3 months after implantation. Outcome measures included monocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA) and near (UNVA) visual acuity and best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA; logMAR units); contrast sensitivity under photopic, mesopic, with glare conditions; and dynamic visual acuity using a self-developed system.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between groups. Monocular UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA were significantly better (all p < 0.001) in the trifocal IOL group, but not BCDVA. The trifocal IOL group showed better contrast sensitivity under photopic, mesopic, with or without glare conditions (p < 0.05) and statistically significantly better dynamic vision at 15, 30, 60, and 90 degrees per second (dps) compared with the monofocal group (all p < 0.001). The strength of positive association only between UIVA and dynamic visual acuity increased as the velocity increased, but not UDVA or UNVA.ConclusionsDiffractive trifocal IOL provides better postoperative full range vision acuity, contrast sensitivity, and dynamic vision compared with monofocal IOLs. And intermediate visual acuity is increasingly associated with DVA as the velocity increasing.Subject terms: Quality of life, Outcomes research     

连续视程人工晶状体和区域折射型人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量的对比分析

目的：比较连续视程(Tecnis Symfony)人工晶状体(IOL)和区域折射型(Lentis Comfort LS-313 MF15)IOL植入术后患者的视觉质量。

方法：临床前瞻性研究。收集2021-01/12在我院行白内障超声乳化联合IOL植入术的白内障患者267例(305眼)，按植入IOL类型分为Symfony组(A组，160眼)和MF15组(B组，145眼)，观察两组患者术后3mo裸眼远视力(uncorrected distance visual acuity， UDVA)(5m)、裸眼中视力(uncorrected intermediate visual acuity， UIVA)(80cm)、裸眼近视力(uncorrected near visual acuity， UNVA)(40cm)，离焦曲线，调制传递函数(MTF)和高阶相差(HOAs)，包括彗差、球差、三叶草差，进行视觉质量问卷调查(Quality of Vision questionnaire，QoV)。

结果：两组患者术前各参数差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组和B组UDVA和UNVA差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)； A组的UIVA高于B组(P<0.05)； A组的MTF值在各个空间频率下均高于B组，差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)； A组的HOAs低于B组(P<0.05)； 术后3mo绘制离焦曲线显示0D处两组视力相似，-0.5D～-2.5D处A组视力优于B组，且在-1.0D和-2.0D处差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)； A组的Qov分数高于B组(P<0.05)； A组出现光晕，星爆等不良视觉干扰现象的频率要高于B组。

结论：MF15和Symfony均提供了稳定的远，近距离视力； 与MF15相比，Symfony IOL具有较好的中距离视力，较高的对比敏感度以及较低的HOAs； 与Symfony相比，MF15人工晶状具有更少的术后不良视觉干扰现象(光晕，星芒等)。     

两种新型多功能人工晶状体矫正老视的疗效比较

目的:比较双焦点人工晶状体(AtLisa tri 809MP)与三焦点人工晶状体(AtLisa tri 839MP)植入术后矫正老视疗效的差异。方法:纳入于我院行白内障超声乳化吸除联合人工晶状体植入术的患者共40例51眼进行分析,其中A组20例25眼植入809MP双焦点人工晶状体,B组20例26眼植入839MP三焦点人工晶状体。收集两组患者术后3mo时远中近视力数值、离焦曲线分析,并通过满意度调查问卷进行统计分析。结果:术后3mo两组裸眼远视力与最佳矫正视力均无差异(P>0.05);中距离视力(80cm)B组显著优于A组(P<0.01);近距离视力改善程度A组、B组无差异(P>0.05)。术后3mo离焦曲线结果A组在0、-3D处形成2个波峰;B组在0、-2.5D处形成2个波峰;两组患者术后均有不同程度的眩光、光晕等表现,但总体满意度较高,视近满意度较高。结论:两种类型人工晶状体均可以为患者提供兼顾远、近的全程视力,术后近距离视物脱镜率高,均可提高良好的近距离视力,三焦点人工晶状体中距离视力更好。     

Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of a new trifocal diffractive intraocular lens

Purpose

To assess the visual outcomes, patient satisfaction and spectacle independence following implantation of new diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses.

两种TECNIS多焦点人工晶状体不同组合方式植入术后视力对比

目的：对比双眼均植入Tecnis Symfony ZXR00(ZXR00)、双眼分别植入ZXR00和Tecnis ZMB00(ZMB00)以及双眼均植入ZMB00患者术后视力、视觉质量及患者满意度。

方法：回顾性病例对照研究。收集2020-08/2021-12行白内障超声乳化吸除联合人工晶状体(IOL)植入的白内障患者117例(234眼),根据IOL不同分为三组：37例(74眼)双眼植入ZMB00为MM组; 44例(88眼)双眼分别植入ZXR00和ZMB00为MR组; 36例(72眼)双眼均植入ZXR00为RR组。观察三组患者术后3 mo裸眼远视力(UDVA,5 m)、裸眼中视力(UIVA,80 cm)、裸眼近视力(UNVA,40 cm)、矫正远视力(CDVA)、离焦曲线、立体视及VF-14、QoV视觉质量评分表问卷调查。

结果：MM和MR组UNVA优于RR组(P<0.05); 而MM组与MR组不具有统计学差异。RR组UIVA最优。三组的UDVA、CDVA和立体视均不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。 术后3 mo时MR、MM、RR组40 cm近立体视锐度分别为107.27±80.53、105.67±83.79、108.69±97.66(20-400)弧秒(P>0.05)。MR、MM、RR组的满意度均达到90%以上。

结论：三组术后均具有良好的远、中、近视力和双眼近立体视。其中,MR组具有更优异的全程视力。三组患者术后满意度均较高,可以根据患者的不同需求选择合适的多焦点人工晶状体。     

比较两种人工晶状体矫正老视效果的临床研究

目的比较非对称区域折射型多焦点人工晶状体(IOL)与衍射型三焦点IOL治疗年龄相关性白内障的疗效。 方法回顾性研究。收集2016年11月至2018年6月于成都爱尔眼科医院白内障中心行超声乳化白内障吸除联合IOL植入术57例(57只眼)患者的病历资料。其中,男性28例(28只眼),女性29例(29只眼);年龄50~76岁,平均年龄(63.3±5.5)岁。按照植入IOL的类型将患者分为区域折射组和衍射三焦组。检查并记录两组患者术前与术后3个月的术眼屈光度、裸眼远距离视力(UDVA)、裸眼中距离视力(UIVA)、裸眼近距离视力(UNVA)、最佳矫正远视力(BCDVA)、客观散射指数(OSI)、调制传递函数截止空间频率(MTF cutoff)、斯特列尔比值(SR)以及对比度视力。根据中文版VF-14视功能指数量表对上述指标进行评分,并对患者进行问卷调查。两组患者患眼的眼轴长度、角膜散光、术前UDVA、术前BCDVA、术后OSI、MTF cutoff、SR及中文版VF-14视功能指数量表评分等指标采用均数±标准差表示,并以独立样本t检验进行比较。UDVA、UIVA、UNVA、BCDVA及对比度视力采用中位数和四分位数间距表示。采用Mann-Whitney U检验,比较两组患者术后3个月术眼的UDVA、UIVA、UNVA、BCDVA以及对比度视力。 结果区域折射组和衍射三焦组患者的术后球镜屈光度分别为-0.75 D~+0.50 D和-0.50 D~+1.00 D。两组患者球镜屈光度位于-0.50 D~+0.50 D区间者占比的比较,差异无统计学意义(χ²＝0.000,P>0.05)。两组患者术后柱镜屈光度分别为0.00 D~-0.75 D和0.00 D~-1.00 D。两组患者柱镜屈光度位于-0.75 D~-1.00 D者占比的比较,差异无统计学意义(χ²＝0.459,P>0.05)。区域折射组患者术后的UDVA、UIVA、UNVA及BCDVA分别为0.10(0.00,0.10)、0.20(0.20,0.20)、0.20(0.10,0.20)及0.00(0.00,0.10);衍射三焦组患者术后分别为0.05(0.00,0.10)、0.20(0.10,0.20)、0.10(0.10,0.20)及0.00(0.00,0.05)。经Mann-Whitney U检验,两组患者术后UDVA、UNVA和BCDVA的比较,差异无统计学意义(Z＝-0.169,-1.265,-1.410;P>0.05);UIVA的比较,差异有统计学意义(Z＝-2.708,P<0.05)。区域折射组患者术后的OSI、MTF cutoff及SR分别为(1.9±0.7)、(24.755±7.751)c/deg和(0.126±0.029);衍射三焦组患者术后分别为(1.6±0.7)、(35.813±9.984)c/deg和(0.195±0.083)。经t检验,两组患者MTF cutoff和SR的比较,差异有统计学意义(t＝-5.419,-4.822;P<0.05);OSI的比较,差异无统计学意义(t＝1.959,P>0.05)。区域折射组患者术后在100%、20%和9%对比度下的对比度视力分别为0.70(0.60,0.90)、0.50(0.40,0.60)和0.30 (0.20,0.30);衍射三焦组分别为1.20(0.95,1.50)、0.70(0.60,0.90)和0.50(0.30,0.70)。经Mann-Whitney U检验,两组患者对比度视力的比较,差异有统计学意义(Z＝-4.882,-4.829,-3.676;P<0.05)。区域折射组与衍射三焦组的中文版VF-14视功能指数量表评分分别为(94.39±4.74)分与(96.86±3.63)分,两者比较的差异无统计学意义(t＝-0.075,P>0.05)。区域折射组与衍射三焦组眩光的发生率分别为10.7%与6.9%。两组近脱镜率和眩光发生率的比较,差异无统计学意义(χ²＝0.181,0.002;P>0.05)。区域折射组与衍射三焦组轻度光晕的发生率分别为3.57%与27.59%,差异有统计学意义(χ²＝4.505,P<0.05)。 结论两种老视矫正型IOL均能为年龄相关性白内障患者提供较好的全程视力,术后患眼屈光度可预测性好,而衍射型三焦点IOL客观视网膜成像质量的评估方面较区域折射型多焦点IOL略好。     

双焦点及散光双焦点人工晶状体混搭植入术后双眼视觉质量的研究

目的：研究散光矫正型双焦点人工晶状体与双焦点人工晶状体混搭植入术后的双眼视觉质量。

方法：横断面研究。纳入2020-01/2021-01收治的年龄相关性白内障患者54例108眼,按植入人工晶状体及术前角膜散光不同分为3组,A组21例42眼术前角膜散光均<1.0D,双眼植入双焦点人工晶状体; B组15例30眼术前角膜散光均≥1.0D,双眼植入散光双焦点人工晶状体; C组18例36眼,一眼术前角膜散光<1.0D,另一眼术前角膜散光≥1.0D,前者植入双焦点人工晶状体,后者植入散光双焦点人工晶状体。比较三组患者术前单眼视力,术后双眼视力、残余散光、双眼离焦曲线、对比敏感度(CS),三组患者术后进行问卷调查评估视觉质量。

结果：三组患者术前视力、术前眼压均无差异(P>0.05)。A组术后残余散光显著高于另两组(P=0.012,<0.05)。B组和C组双眼远视力优于A组(均P<0.05); B组和C组双眼近视力优于A组(均P<0.01); A组双眼中视力优于B组和C组(均P<0.01)。明视眩光6、12c/d,暗视6、12、18c/d,以及暗视眩光1.5、3、6、12、18c/d的空间频率下A组CS较B组和C组显著降低(均P<0.05)。术后视功能调查表三组间无差异(P>0.05)。

结论：散光双焦人工晶状体与双焦人工晶状体混搭植入可改善患者术后视觉质量。矫正散光有助于提高术后患者的视觉CS,但是散光全矫后,可能会导致患者术后中视力的下降。     

The refractive outcome of Toric Lentis Mplus implant in cataract surgery

AIM: To evaluate the refractive outcome of Toric Lentis Mplus intraocular lens (IOL) implant. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series. Consecutive patients with corneal astigmatism of at least 1.5 D had Toric Lentis Mplus IOL implant during cataract surgery. The exclusion criteria included irregular astigmatism on corneal topography, large scotopic pupil diameter (>6 mm), poor visual potential and significant ocular comorbidity. Postoperative manifest refraction, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 3/4 m and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) were obtained. RESULTS: There were 70 eyes from 49 patients in this study. Patients were refracted at a median of 8.9wk (range 4.0 to 15.5) from the operation date. Sixty-five percent of eyes had 6/7.5 (0.10 logMAR) or better, and 99% 6/12 (0.30 logMAR) or better postoperative UDVA. Eighty-nine percent could read Jaeger (J) 3 (0.28 logMAR) and 95% J5 (0.37 logMAR) at 40 cm. The median magnitude of astigmatism decreased from 1.91 D to 0.49 D (Wilcoxon, P<0.001) after the operation. The range of the cylindrical error was reduced from 1.5-3.95 D (keratometric) preoperatively to 0.00-1.46 D (subjective refraction transposed to corneal plane) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Toric Lentis Mplus IOL has good predictability in reducing preexisting corneal astigmatism.