Minimally invasive cardiac surgery for aortic valve disease

Recent surgical advances leading to good operative results have contributed to the trend to useminimally invasive approaches, even in cardiac surgery. Smaller incisions are clearly more cosmetically acceptable to patients. When using a minimally invasive approach, it is most important to maintain surgical quality without jeopardizing patients. A good operative visual field leads to good surgical results. In the parasternal approach, we use a retractor to harvest an internal thoracic artery in coronary artery bypass surgery. Retracting the sternum upward allows for a good surgical view and permits the use of an arch cannula rather than femoral cannulation. When reoperating for aortic valve repair, the j-sternotomy approach requires less adhesiolysis compared with the traditional full sternotomy. No special technique is necessary to perform aortic valve surgery using the j-sternotomy approach. However, meticulous attention must be paid to avoiding left ventricular air embolisms to prevent postoperative stroke or neurocognitive deficits, especially when utilizing a minimally invasive approach. Transesophageal echo is useful not only for monitoring cardiac function but also for monitoring the persence of air in the left ventricle and atrium. This paper compare as the degree of invasion of minimally invasive cardiac surgery and the traditional full sternotomy. No differences were found in the occurrence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome between patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery and the traditional technique. Therefore it is concluded that minimally invasive surgery for patients with aortic valve disease may become the standard approach in the near future.     

Minimally invasive mitral valve replacement in a patient with previous omphalocele repair and severe scoliosis

Mitral valve surgery in a patient with severe chest deformity and poor respiratory function can be associated with a high risk due to difficult access and postoperative respiratory failure. A 45-year-old man with scoliosis and respiratory dysfunction who had undergone previous omphalocele repairs presented with severe mitral regurgitation. Mitral valve replacement via right mini-thoracotomy was successfully performed. The minimally invasive approach was considered useful in this patient with anatomical difficulty and respiratory dysfunction.     

微创主动脉瓣置换术及术后早期结果

目的 探讨微创主动脉瓣置换术的可行性及效果.方法 回顾性分析2010年6月至2011年10月,20例单纯微创主动脉瓣置换术,男12例,女8例;平均年龄(47.60±12.28)岁.患者采用双腔气管插管,股动、静脉插管建立体外循环,右胸骨旁第3肋间切口,腋前线第4肋间置入阻断钳阻断升主动脉,完成主动脉瓣置换术.结果 全组无死亡,1例因主动脉吻合口出血转为前正中开胸行升主动脉置换术,所有患者均顺利出院.19例微创主动脉瓣置换术患者平均体外循环(124.00±39.83)min,主动脉阻断(97.21±33.17) min,气管插管(13.55±3.87)h,术后ICU停留(16.34±3.82)h,术后平均住院(6.63±1.45)天.未输血患者13例.平均切口长度(4.73±0.54)cm.术后复查无瓣周漏,无瓣膜功能障碍.电话或门诊随访,l例因脑梗塞死亡,余19例均恢复良好,没有瓣周漏,心功能Ⅰ级.结论 采用股动、静脉插管技术建立体外循环,右胸第3肋间微小切口完成微创主动脉瓣置换术,手术创伤小,术后恢复快,出血、输血少,美容效果好,安全可靠,值得推广.     

Minimally invasive valve surgery

As alternatives to standard sternotomy, surgeons have developed innovative, minimally invasive approaches to conducting valve surgery. Through very small skin incisions and partial upper sternal division for aortic valve surgery and right minithoracotomy for mitral surgery, surgeons have become adept at performing complex valve procedures. Beyond cosmetic appeal, apparent benefits range from decreased pain and bleeding to improved respiratory function and recovery time. The large retrospective studies and few small prospective randomized studies are herein briefly summarized. The focus is then directed toward describing specific intraoperative technical details in current clinical use, covering anesthetic preparation, incision, mediastinal access, cardiovascular cannulation, valve exposure, and valve reconstruction. Finally, unique situations such as pulmonic valve surgery, reoperations, beating heart surgery, and robotics are discussed.     

Minimally invasive valve surgery

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery has been the last area of clinical surgery to adopt and embrace minimally invasive surgical techniques. Since the onset of arterial embolectomy in 1965, arthroscopic knee surgery performed in 1975 and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1985, huge advances in videoscopic, thorascopic and small incision surgery has taken place in all specialties which now allow change in the traditional approaches to cardiac valve surgery. In 1996, the Brigham and Women's Hospital, along with other units, began minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery for patients who had isolated valve pathology without coronary disease. Our experience now totals 689 patients, including 353 minimally invasive mitral valve repair/replacements and 336 minimally invasive aortic valve replacements, including root replacement and reoperations. METHODS: This new operative approach involves smaller incisions, the mandatory use of transesophageal echocardiogram for the monitoring of operation quality and air removal, newer perfusion techniques and some modifications in the standard valve repair/replacement techniques. With this blending of TEE, better perfusion techniques and new exposure, the safety and quality of valve operations by these techniques have been excellent. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The operative mortality is equal to (AVR) or less than (MVP) conventional open sternotomy cases and there is a shorter length of stay in the ICU and post-ICU, leading to a lower cost than conventional procedures. There are also less blood transfusions, atrial fibrillation and posthospital rehabilitation requirements, and patients have indicated that there is a faster return to normality over the conventional operative approaches. This brief report summarizes our experience from July, 1996 to January 2001.     

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery

Cardiac surgery has been the last of the surgical specialties to embrace the principles of minimal invasiveness. The complexity and invasiveness of the procedures have presented both a problem and an opportunity to make the procedures less invasive. Beginning with initial attempts at coronary artery bypass surgery through limited access with and without robotics, a number of other cardiac procedures currently are being performed by minimally invasive approaches. These include mitral valve repair, transapical aortic valve implant, limited access, and totally endoscopic pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and the treatment of aortic aneurysmal disease by thoracic endografting. The experience with less invasive surgery in other specialties has served as cross-fertilization for minimally invasive cardiac surgery.     

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIC-MVS) was introduced into clinical practice in the mid 1990s. Since then it has evolved as the standard technique at some specialized centers. The routine technique includes femoral access for extracorporeal circulation, a right lateral minithoracotomy and direct aortic clamping using special instruments. Different techniques leading to some variations have been described. There is no prospectively randomized trial comparing minimally invasive with conventional mitral valve surgery. However, several series including large patient numbers and up to 8 years of follow-up have been published. Literature results as well as different aspects of minimally invasive MVS are discussed in this review, including the development, the current technique and future perspectives. Regarding MIC-MVS the word is that it is a safe and effective operation. Lateral minithoracotomy access offers excellent exposure, visualization can be further enhanced when using endoscopic cameras. All different mitral valve repair procedures can be performed even in the presence of complex pathologies. The repair rate is excellent and reaches 75%. Patient recovery is fast leading to a significant improvement in individual quality of life. MIC-MVS can now be considered the standard approach and will reach more widespread clinical application.     

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery defined

There is no operation as complex, yet as fundamentally unchanged over time, as conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This remarkable achievement is attributed to the operation's adaptability to a wide variety of clinical settings; its reproducibility, although performed by surgeons all across the world; and its proved track record for safety and effectiveness. A monumental effort, however, is currently under way to redefine CABG. This paradigm shift has received a groundswell of support as advances in minimally invasive surgery in other areas, such as arthroscopy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and thoracoscopy, combined with an increasing focus on cost containment, have forever changed the milieu of the cardiac surgeon. This review examines the clinical and research issues surrounding minimally invasive CABG from the vantage point of a surgeon-scientist working in the field.     

Minimally invasive direct access mitral valve surgery.

We reviewed our experience with minimally invasive direct-access mitral valve surgery in 207 patients through February 1999. Three patients underwent associated procedures, a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with right internal mammary artery to right carotid artery (RIMA-RCA), a left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) debridement for endocarditis, and a primum atrial septal defect (ASD) repair, and were excluded from analysis. Of the 204 remaining patients, 120 (59%) patients were men, aged 58.7 +/- 13.2 years, functional class of 2.3 +/- 0.5. The cause was myxomatous in 162 (79%) patients, rheumatic in 28 (14%) patients, endocarditis in 8 (4%) patients, congenital in 3 (2%) patients, and ischemic in 3 (2%) patients. Mean preoperative EF was 60% +/- 10%, with 184 (90%) patients showing ejection fraction (EF) greater than 50%. The valve was approached through a 5- to 8-cm right parasternal (n = 180, 88%) or right inframammary (n = 24, 12%) incision. One hundred nineteen (58%) patients had open femoral artery-femoral vein cannulation, and 85 (42%) patients had direct cannulation of the aorta and percutaneous cannulation of the femoral vein. One hundred seventy (83%) patients underwent successful valve repair, and 34 (17%) patients required valve replacement. The mean duration of aortic clamping and cardiopulmonary were, respectively, 100 +/- 34 and 146 +/- 44 minutes. There were 2 (1%) surgical deaths. Nonfatal perioperative complications included 3 (1.5%) ascending aortic complications, 3 (1.5%) reoperations for bleeding, 4 (2%) strokes, 2 (1%) transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), 2 (1%) myocardial infarctions, 3 (1.5%) pericardial effusions requiring drainage, 9 (4.5%) vascular complications, and 3 (1.5%) wound complications. Mean length of stay (LOS) was 6.1 +/- 3 days, with 63 (31%) patients being discharged in less than 5 days. One hundred twenty-nine (63%) patients did not require blood transfusions. Follow-up was complete in 165 (81%) patients, with mean follow-up of 13.2 +/- 8 months. Late complications included 1 (0.5%) myocardial infarction, 3 (1.5%) reoperations, all converting repairs to replacements, 3 (1.5%) wound hernias requiring reoperation and repair with mesh, 5 (2.5%) thromboembolic events, and 3 (1.5%) deaths of suicide, pneumonia, and sudden death, respectively. Mean follow-up New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was 1.2 +/- 0.5. We conclude that minimally invasive direct-access mitral valve surgery is safe, effective, and applicable for most patients presenting for isolated mitral valve surgery. We now consider it the standard of care for selected patients.     

全胸腔镜下微创二尖瓣置换术

目的 总结全胸腔镜下二尖瓣置换手术55例成功经验.方法 采用右胸壁打孔,股动脉、股静脉插管建立周围体外循环,阻闭升主动脉,冷血停跳液顺行灌注保护心肌,全胸腔镜下行二尖瓣置换手术.结果 手术均获成功,无死亡.手术3.6～5.6 h,平均(4.6±1.0)h.体外循环90～146 min,平均(118±28) min,升主动脉阻断55～85 min,平均(70±15) min;术后呼吸机辅助9.2～16.4 h,平均(10.2±3.1) h;胸液引流量80～350 ml,平均(72±28) ml;住院10～16 d,平均(13±3) d.结论 全胸腔镜下二尖瓣置换手术安全可靠、创伤小、恢复快、美容效果好.     

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery after failed transcatheter mitral valve repair in an intermediate-risk cohort

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESAlthough clinical experience with transcatheter mitral valve interventions is rapidly increasing, there is still a lack of evidence regarding surgical treatment options for the management of recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR). This study provides guidance for a minimally invasive surgical approach following failed transcatheter mitral valve repair, which is based on the underlying mitral valve (MV) pathology and the type of intervention.METHODSA total of 46 patients who underwent minimally invasive MV surgery due to recurrent or residual MR after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair or direct interventional annuloplasty between October 2014 and March 2021 were included.RESULTSThe median age of the patients was 78 [interquartile range, 71–82] years and the EuroSCORE II was 4.41 [interquartile range, 2.66–6.55]. At the index procedure, edge-to-edge repair had been performed in 45 (97.8%) patients and direct annuloplasty in 1 patient. All patients with functional MR at the index procedure (n = 36) underwent MV replacement. Of the patients with degenerative MR (n = 10), 5 patients were eligible for MV repair after removal of the MitraClip. The 1-year survival following surgical treatment was 81.3% and 75.0% in patients with functional and degenerative MR, respectively. No residual MR greater than mild during follow-up was observed in patients who underwent MV repair.CONCLUSIONSMinimally invasive surgery following failed transcatheter mitral valve repair is feasible and safe, with promising midterm survival. The surgical management should be tailored to the underlying valve pathology at the index procedure, the extent of damage of the MV leaflets and the type of previous intervention.