Implementation of a pharmacy-based immunization program in a supermarket chain

OBJECTIVE: To describe procedures for implementing a pharmacy-based immunization program in a supermarket chain. SETTING: Supermarket chain pharmacy. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Ukrop's is a local supermarket chain with 27 stores in the greater area of Richmond, Fredericksburg, and Williamsburg, Virginia, 19 of which have pharmacies. Ukrop's offers enhanced patient care services including immunizations, diabetes, asthma, hypertension, hyperlipidemia monitoring, and smoking cessation. All pharmacies offer adult immunizations and host periodic diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia screening events. PRACTICE INNOVATION: Adult immunization program. INTERVENTIONS: Each pharmacy offered influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations on a walk-up basis during pharmacy hours and during clinics held at least 3 days per week. Immunizations were also offered periodically at off-site locations. Distribution of letters and chart stickers to patients' physicians, and even partnership with a physician to establish the immunization protocol, helped increase awareness of the pharmacy immunization services. This service involved a core group of immunizing pharmacists who developed a policies and procedures manual, distributed the vaccine, and handled additional staffing requirements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of adult influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations administered by pharmacists. RESULTS: Between September and December 1998, Ukrop's pharmacists administered 5,137 influenza vaccinations and 613 pneumococcal vaccinations. Between September 1999 and January 2000, Ukrop's pharmacists administered 18,000 influenza vaccinations and 1,200 pneumococcal vaccinations. CONCLUSION: In addition to immunizing thousands of people in its first year, the program served as a successful marketing tool to increase awareness of enhanced pharmacy services in the community and among local physicians. Administration of vaccines increased pharmacists involvement with and enthusiasm for enhanced patient care services and generated a revenue stream for the pharmacies.     

Diabetes care in Norwegian pharmacies: a descriptive study

OBJECTIVE: To describe Norwegian pharmacies' involvement in diabetes care, to investigate pharmacists' views on future services and to investigate whether the recommendations in the Norwegian diabetes declaration for pharmacies have been implemented. Setting Hospital and community pharmacies in Norway. METHOD: All 543 pharmacies in Norway, of which 511 were community pharmacies and 32 were hospital pharmacies, received a link to a web-based questionnaire. One pharmacist from each pharmacy was asked to complete the questionnaire. The questionnaire covered subjects ranging from the diabetes declaration and the pharmacists' views on which services the pharmacy should offer in the future, to demographic characteristics. RESULTS: In total 358 (66%) questionnaires were completed. The diabetes declaration was read by 37% of the pharmacists. Almost all pharmacies complied with the declarations' recommendations regarding glucose monitoring services. Twenty four percent of the pharmacies could offer medication reviews, and roughly 10% could offer screening for undiagnosed diabetes. Counseling on lifestyle issues was the least implemented recommendation. Eighty one percent of the pharmacists reported a wish to expand their services towards diabetes patients. Services in regard to glucose monitoring had the highest score, however the views on which services should be offered varied a great deal. Already performing a service increased the chance of the pharmacist being positive towards offering it. CONCLUSION: Norwegian pharmacists report that they are involved in a wide range of diabetes related services, although only 37% report to have read the diabetes declaration. The pharmacists generally wish to actively support patients with diabetes, and further research should concentrate on identifying the areas where their involvement is most productive.     

Influences on the frequency and type of community pharmacy services

Objectives

To describe services provided by community pharmacies and to identify factors associated with services being provided in community pharmacies.

Practice characteristics of bachelor of science and doctor of pharmacy degreed pharmacists based on the 2009 National Workforce Survey

Objective

To compare practice settings and activities of pharmacists with bachelor of science (BS) in pharmacy and doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) degrees.

Methods

Data from the 2009 National Pharmacist Workforce Survey instrument were analyzed. Multivariate regression was used to examine the association of the PharmD degree with time spent in dispensing and patient care.

Results

The survey response rate by pharmacists was 52%, and 562 usable responses met our inclusion criteria. Sixty-three percent of BS and 39% of PharmD pharmacists were employed in community pharmacies, compared with 21% of BS and 38% of PharmD pharmacists employed in hospital pharmacy settings. Practicing in a community setting had the strongest influence on time spent in dispensing and time spent in patient care. Among respondents with PharmD degrees, a residency was associated with less time in dispensing and more time in patient care.

Conclusion

Time spent in dispensing and patient care were influenced more by practice setting than by educational degree and residency training.     

Point-of-care testing for infectious diseases: Opportunities,barriers, and considerations in community pharmacy

ObjectivesTo identify opportunities to perform point-of-care (POC) testing and/or screening for infectious diseases in community pharmacies, provide an overview of such tests and how they are used in current practice, discuss how the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) affect pharmacists performing POC testing, and identify and discuss barriers and provide recommendations for those wanting to establish POC testing for infectious diseases services in community pharmacies.Data sourcesPubMed and Google Scholar were searched from November 2012 through May 2013 and encompassed the years 2000 and beyond for the narrative review section of this article using the search terms rapid diagnostic tests, POC testing and infectious diseases, pharmacy services, CLIA waiver, and collaborative drug therapy management. All state boards of pharmacy in the United States were contacted and their regulatory and legislative websites accessed in 2012 and January 2013 to review relevant pharmacy practice laws.Data synthesisPOC testing for infectious diseases represents a significant opportunity to expand services in community pharmacies. Pharmacist education and training are addressing knowledge deficits in good laboratory practices and test performance and interpretation. Federal regulations do not define the qualifications for those who perform CLIA-waived tests, yet few pharmacists perform such services. Fewer than 20% of states address POC testing in their statutes and regulations governing pharmacy.ConclusionPOC testing for infectious diseases could benefit patients and society and represents an opportunity to expand pharmacy services in community pharmacies. Existing barriers to the implementation of such services in community pharmacies, including deficits in pharmacist training and education along with state regulatory and legislative variance and vagueness in statutes governing pharmacy, are not insurmountable.     

Interruptions in community pharmacies: Frequency,sources, and mitigation strategies

BackgroundInterruptions constitute a key part of the communication strategy for healthcare providers, including community pharmacy personnel. Previous research in other healthcare environments has shown that interruptions are very common and may present as patient safety hazards. One 1999 study, conducted in community pharmacy settings, found that interruptions were prevalent and associated with dispensing errors. In the last 20 years, pharmacies have expanded patient services and implemented new technology. Yet, it is unknown how these changes have affected interruption sources and frequency.ObjectiveThe objective was to characterize the frequency and sources of pharmacist task interruptions that occur in community pharmacies.MethodsA cross-sectional qualitative study design was used to evaluate the frequency and sources of pharmacist task interruptions in Wisconsin community pharmacies. The participants included 9 pharmacists and 9 technicians working in 2 independently-owned, 2 mass merchandise, and 2 hospital/clinical-affiliated pharmacies.ResultsInterruption rates ranged from 3 to 7 per hour across the 6 pharmacies. Sources of interruptions included: patients, technicians, self-initiated interruptions, technology used in the pharmacy, and a second pharmacist.ConclusionsInterruptions are common in community pharmacies and the causes are multifactorial. Prudent management of interruptions in these work environments may involve improved technician training and better designs of pharmacy technology.     

Community pharmacists and Colleges of Pharmacy: the Ohio partnership.

OBJECTIVE: To develop pharmacist practice standards, pharmacy preceptor standards, and objectives for students completing advanced practice community pharmacy rotations. SETTING: Ohio. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Pharmacy schools and community pharmacies that serve as advanced practice rotation sites. PRACTICE INNOVATION: Developed standards for preceptors and objectives for student experiences. INTERVENTIONS: Focus groups that included both community pharmacists and pharmacy faculty collaborated on defining key standards for advanced community pharmacy rotations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Not applicable. RESULTS: Three main documents were produced in this initiative, and these are provided as appendices to this article. Professional and patient care guidelines for preceptors define minimum standards for these role models. Expectations of pharmacists as preceptors provide insights for managing this student-teacher relationship, which is fundamentally different from the more common employer-employee and coworker relationships found in pharmacies of all types. Objectives for student experiences during advanced practice community pharmacy rotations present core expectations in clinical, dispensing, patient education, wellness, and drug information areas. CONCLUSION: Through this collaboration, Ohio colleges of pharmacy developed a partnership with practitioners in community settings that should enhance the Ohio experiential educational program for student pharmacists. Use of the established guidelines will help educators and practitioners achieve their shared vision for advanced practice community pharmacy rotations and promote high-quality patient care.     

Pharmacist-reported practice change as a result of a statewide community pharmacy accreditation program

ObjectivesTo assess pharmacist-reported practice change as a result of participation in a community pharmacy accreditation program.SettingCommunity pharmacy practice in Wisconsin.Practice innovationThe Wisconsin Pharmacy Quality Collaborative (WPQC) is a network of pharmacies and pharmacists who provide standardized pharmacy services. WPQC is based on a unique set of quality-based best practices designed to improve patient safety in the medication use process. WPQC is supported by the statewide pharmacy organization, the Pharmacy Society of Wisconsin (PSW), which provides resources focused on implementation and engagement to support the success of WPQC-accredited pharmacies.Program evaluationPSW used a 24-question online survey to evaluate the degree of pharmacist-reported practice change as a result of the WPQC quality-based best practices.ResultsPharmacist-reported frequency and consistency of all quality-based best practices and services increased after WPQC accreditation (P < 0.05), with the exception of robotic dispensing systems, holding regular staff meetings for team communication, and providing incentives for recording quality-related events. In addition, quality-based best practices and WPQC services had a positive impact on pharmacist perceptions of their quality of patient care, patient safety, patient satisfaction, and patient relationships in WPQC-accredited pharmacies. The majority of pharmacies valued WPQC accreditation and shared positive comments about their experiences.ConclusionA community pharmacy accreditation program using standardized quality-based best practices can create and reinforce behavior change in the community pharmacy setting to positively affect patient care and medication safety. Research is needed to determine if there are actual behavior changes as a result of WPQC accreditation compared with pharmacies that have elected not to participate.     

Family health services authorities and community pharmacists at the purchaser-provider interface

The views of both purchasers (family health services authorities [FHSAs]) and providers (community pharmacists) were sought on the development of community pharmaceutical services in the light of the 1992 pharmaceutical care report. Questionnaires were posted to the 480 pharmacists in charge of all community pharmacies in Wessex and to the 98 general managers of FHSAs in England and Wales. The questionnaires focused on reactions to those recommendations of the pharmaceutical care report which, if implemented, would have significant implications for the community pharmacist's workload. Both the FHSAs and community pharmacists indicated that, in their view, the skills of the community pharmacist are currently underutilised. Both groups expressed enthusiasm for the pharmaceutical care report recommendations that the following services should be provided: domiciliary services, disposal of unwanted medicines, supply of aids for disabled people, supply of compliance aids and adverse drug reaction reporting. Neither group was enthusiastic about pharmacists providing a therapeutic drug monitoring service from community pharmacies. On other areas, pharmacists were more enthusiastic about the provision of health advice, diagnostic/screening services and treatment protocols, while FHSAs favoured distribution of welfare foods, needle exchange, instalment dispensing and referral forms. Overall, both the FHSAs and community pharmacists were receptive to the principle of the development of the role of the community pharmacist within the primary health care team but expressed concerns regarding the training and workload implications.     

Workload and its impact on community pharmacists' job satisfaction and stress: a review of the literature

Objective The objective was to identify, review and evaluate published literature on workloads of pharmacists in community pharmacy. It included identification of research involving the measurement of pharmacist workload and its impact on stress levels and job satisfaction. The review focused on literature relating to practice in the UK. Methods Electronic databases were searched from 1995 to May 2011. In addition, manual searches were completed for documents not available electronically. The findings were analysed with specific focus on research methodology, workload and its impact on pharmacist job satisfaction and stress levels. Key findings Thirteen relevant studies relating to workload in community pharmacy alone or in conjunction with job satisfaction and stress were identified. One utilised both qualitative and quantitative methods to identify differences in pharmacist workload in retail pharmacy businesses before and after the implementation of the 2005 English and Welsh community pharmacy contractual framework. This indicated that pharmacists spend most of their working day dispensing. The majority of studies suggested community pharmacists generally perceived that workload levels were increasing. Several also stated that increased workload contributed to increasing job‐related stress and decreasing job satisfaction. No studies reporting dispensing rates for community pharmacies in the UK were identified and there was limited evidence concerning time devoted to non‐dispensing services. One study investigated the differences between self‐estimated and actual workload. Conclusions Whilst there is a clear perception that the type and amount of work output expected from individual community pharmacists has been changing and increasing over the last few decades, pharmacists are viewed as continuing to remain based in the dispensary. The impact of such changes to the practice of community pharmacy in the UK is poorly defined, although links have been made to increasing levels of pharmacist job dissatisfaction and stress.     

Community pharmacists' attitudes to medicines management: a qualitative study

Objective To explore community pharmacists' knowledge of, and attitudes toward, medicines management, including concerns or barriers to offering medicines management services from community pharmacy premises. Method Focus groups held with purposively sampled pharmacists from community, practice and research sectors in Scotland. Participants were invited to discuss community pharmacists' knowledge and experience of medicines management, concerns about providing medicines management services from community pharmacy premises, and possible effects of such services on relationships with general practitioners (GPs). Key findings Ten pharmacists attended two focus groups. Characteristics of participants varied according to sex and employment status as well as the type and setting of the pharmacy in which they worked. Participants were familiar with the term ‘medicines management’ but understanding varied between and within groups and differences from and similarities to the term ‘pharmaceutical care’ were less clear. Concerns about the delivery of extended services included practical issues and the effect on the ‘traditional’ role of the community pharmacist. Views were mixed on whether medicines management could become a routine part of all community pharmacists' practice or whether it required specialisation. Pharmacists distinguish between ‘patients’ and ‘customers’ in relation to their differing needs. The relationship between pharmacists and GPs was influenced by the post held by the pharmacist and the setting of the pharmacy. Conclusions The pharmacists in this small, regional sample expressed a wide range of attitudes and opinions about the delivery of medicines management services from community pharmacies. Useful insights were given into the practicalities of providing such services on a daily basis in the current working environment, and how pharmacists might be able to provide medicines management services in other ways. Medicines management can be seen as a reprofessionalising strategy for pharmacy, making use of the pharmacist's status as an ‘expert’ to enhance the natural object, the ‘drug’ into the object of social significance, the ‘medicine’. Further research with pharmacists from other regions is needed to confirm this explanation.