Acetabular revision with impacted morselized cancellous bone graft and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: three to fourteen-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: Acetabular revision in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is often difficult because of the poor quality and quantity of the acetabular bone stock. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes of acetabular revision with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polyethylene cup. METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive acetabular revisions were performed with impaction bone-grafting and use of a cemented cup in twenty-eight patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The average age at the revision was fifty-seven years. The minimum duration of follow-up of all reconstructions that were still functioning or that were followed until the time of death was three years (mean, 7.5 years; range, three to fourteen years). No patient was lost to follow-up, but five patients (six hips) died before the time of the review. The acetabular bone defects were classified as cavitary in twelve hips and as combined segmental-cavitary in twenty-three. RESULTS: The five patients (six hips) who died had been doing well at the time of their latest follow-up. Of the remaining patients, six (six hips) had a repeat revision. The average Harris hip score of the living patients with a surviving implant at the time of follow-up was 82 points, and there was no or only mild pain in twenty-one of the twenty-three hips. Radiographic analysis of all twenty-nine hips that had not been revised showed loosening in one hip and a nonprogressive radiolucent line in one zone in two others. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a prosthetic survival rate, with aseptic loosening as the end point, of 90% at eight years. CONCLUSION: Acetabular revision with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis had acceptable results at an average of 7.5 years postoperatively.     

Acetabular revision with impacted freeze-dried cancellous bone chips and a cemented cup: a report of 7 cases at 5 to 9 years' follow-up

The long-term results of bone impaction grafting with fresh-frozen femoral head allografts and a cemented cup are favorable. Because of intermittent shortage of fresh-frozen femoral heads at our local bone bank, we used processed freeze-dried bone in 7 acetabular revisions operated between 1989 and 1994. All 7 consecutive patients were followed annually. At final review (March 2000), 1 patient had died after 8.5 years of follow-up of a cause not related to the surgery. In 1 hip, a rerevision was performed for septic loosening 5 years after the previous septic loosening. Radiographically the freeze-dried allografts seemed to incorporate in all cases but the reinfected one; progressive radiolucent lines were not seen, although 1 case had a stable line in 1 zone. The overall survival rate for the 7 acetabular reconstructions at an average follow-up of 7 years (range, 5-9 years) was 86%. At midterm follow-up, there was no aseptic loosening. In this limited case report, the results at midterm for freeze-dried allograft bone chips in acetabular reconstructions are acceptable.     

Acetabular revision with morsellised allogenic bone graft and a cemented metal-backed component

Failure of total hip arthroplasty with acetabular deficiency occurred in 55 patients (60 hips) and was treated with acetabular revision using morsellised allograft and a cemented metal-backed component. A total of 50 patients (55 hips) were available for clinical and radiological evaluation at a mean follow-up of 5.8 years (3 to 9.5). No hip required further revision of the acetabular component because of aseptic loosening. All the hips except one had complete incorporation of the allograft demonstrated on the radiographs. A complete radiolucent line of > 1 mm was noted in two hips post-operatively. A good to excellent result occurred in 50 hips (91%). With radiological evidence of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component as the end-point, the survivorship at a mean of 5.8 years after surgery was 96.4%. The use of impacted allograft chips in combination with a cemented metal-backed acetabular component and screw fixation can achieve good medium-term results in patients with acetabular bone deficiency.     

Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morcellized cancellous bone autograft and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty: a 10- to 17-year follow-up study

During the period 1979 through 1986, 69 acetabular reconstructions in 63 patients were performed with the use of autologous morcellized bone-grafts because of acetabular bone stock loss. Nine cases (10 hips) were lost to follow-up. Eleven patients (12 hips) died <10 years after surgery; none had a revision. The results for the remaining 43 patients (47 hips) were reviewed at an average interval of 12.3 years (range, 10-17 years). No preoperative Harris hip score was available. The average Harris hip score at follow-up was 88 (range, 60-100). Radiographically, all grafts united. One hip developed a deep infection. Three other hips (6%) were revised because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. An additional 3 acetabular components were considered radiographic failures. Excluding the infected case, the overall survival rate of these acetabular reconstructions with a revision as endpoint was 94% at an average follow-up of 12.3 years. Reconstruction of acetabular bone stock loss with autologous morcellized bone-grafts is an attractive technique with a good potential for long-term success.     

Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup: 20 years' experience.

Acetabular bone stock loss compromises the outcome in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. In 1979, a biologic method was introduced with tightly impacted cancellous allografts in combination with a cemented polyethylene cup for acetabular reconstruction. With this technique, it is possible to replace the loss of bone and to repair normal hip mechanics and hip function with a standard implant. Based on the authors' 20 years experience, a review of the long-term data is presented in primary total hip arthroplasty with preexisting acetabular bone stock loss, primary total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis, patients who had bone impaction when younger than 50 years, and in acetabular revisions. The survival rate with revision of the cup for aseptic loosening as the end point was 94% at 10 to 17 years, 90% at 10 to 18 years, 91% at 10 to 17 years, and 92% at 10 to 15 years. From biopsy specimens from humans and histologic data in animal experiments the incorporation of these impacted bone chips was proven. The acetabular bone impaction technique using large morselized bone chips (range, 0.7-1 cm) and a cemented cup is a reliable technique with favorable long-term outcome.     

Acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty using an impacted morselized allograft and a cementless cup: minimum 10-year follow-up

This study was undertaken to analyze the clinical and radiologic results of acetabular revision arthroplasty using an impacted morselized allograft and a cementless cup and was performed on 71 hips of 62 patients who were followed up for a minimum of 10 years (10 years to 14 years 8 months; mean, 12 years). The acetabular bone defects were classified using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Committee on the Hip and Paprosky classifications. Cementless hemispherical cups were inserted via a press-fit technique, using an impacted morselized allograft. The mean Harris hip score at the last follow-up visit was 92. Only 3 cases were re-revised, and the 12-year survival rate was thus 95.8%. The study shows that acetabular revision arthroplasty using an impacted morselized allograft and a cementless cup is an excellent treatment option.     

Acetabular reconstruction with impacted bone allografts and cemented acetabular components: a 2- to 13-year follow-up study of 142 aseptic revisions

We reviewed the clinical and radiological results of 131 patients who underwent acetabular revision for aseptic loosening with impacted bone allograft and a cemented acetabular component. The mean follow-up was 51.7 months (24 to 156). The mean post-operative Merle D'Aubigné and Postel scores were 5.7 points (4 to 6) for pain, 5.2 (3 to 6) for gait and 4.5 (2 to 6) for mobility. Radiological evaluation revealed migration greater than 5 mm in four acetabular components. Radiological failure matched clinical failure. Asymptomatic radiolucent lines were observed in 31 of 426 areas assessed (7%). Further revision was required in six patients (4.5%), this was due to infection in three and mechanical failure in three. The survival rate for the reconstruction was 95.8% (95% confidence interval 92.3 to 99.1) overall, and 98%, excluding revision due to sepsis. Our study, from an independent centre, has reproduced the results of the originators of the method.     

Acetabular revision with bone graft and cementless cup

Cementless acetabular components are routinely used in revision hip surgery. Nevertheless, few investigators have assessed their retention and efficacy over the long term. This occurs mainly in cases which originate from moderate to severe bone losses (cavitary and or segmental) requiring the use of morselized and or bulk bone graft. Our objective in the present study is to report the outcome of 42 patients with 43 cementless acetabular revisions with bone graft who were operated by the same surgeon. The report is based on the clinical and radiographic evaluation of the patients alive at 167 months of follow-up.     

Acetabular revision surgery with impacted bone allografts and cemented cups in patients younger than 55 years

This article summarises a clinical and radiographical analysis of 30 acetabular revisions in patients younger than 55 years old, performed with impaction bone grafting and cemented cups. Preoperative Merle D’Aubigne and Postel functional score was an average 7 points. At a mean follow-up of 86.5 months (range 34–228) functional score averaged 16.3 points. Radiolucent lines with no clinical impact were observed in 7% of DeLee and Charnley acetabular zones evaluated. Massive radiological migration, consistent with clinical failure, was observed in two cups. Three patients underwent re-revision surgery (10%): two due to infection and one due to mechanical failure. Reconstruction survival rate was 89% (CI 95% 71.9–96.4) overall, and 96% (CI 95% 82.6–99.3) ruling out cases of infection. Impacted bone allograft constitutes one of the reconstructive techniques of choice in acetabular revision surgery of young patients. Restoration of bone stock is essential in this group of patients due to the possibility of future revisions.

---

Résumé  Nous avons analysé cliniquement et radiographiquement 30 révisions acétabulaires chez des patients jeunes agés de moins de 55 ans, révision réalisée avec une greffe impactée et une cup cimentée. Le score pré-opératoire de Postel Merle d’Aubigné était en moyenne à 7 points. Après un suivi moyen de 86,5 mois (de 34 à 228 mois) le score post-opératoire de Postel Merle d’Aubigné était en moyenne à 16,3 points. Des liserés sans traduction clinique ont été observés dans 7% des cas et analysés selon DeLee et Charnley. Une migration massive radiographique avec un échec clinique a été observé dans deux cas. 3 patients ont nécessité une nouvelle révision (10%), 2 pour infection et 1 pour échec clinique. Le taux de survie de cette reconstruction a été de 89% (intervalle de confiance 95% 71.9–96.4) et de 96% (intervalle de confiance 95% 82.6–99.3) pour les cas d’infection. L’allogreffe impactée constitue une technique de choix pour la reconstruction lors d’une révision acétabulaire chez des patients jeunes. La restauration du stock osseux est essentielle dans ce groupe de patients et permet d’anticiper de futures révisions.

     

Acetabular components without bulk bone graft in revision surgery: A 5- to 13-year follow-up study

Eighty-three consecutive revisions in 74 patients using a porous-coated acetabular component without bulk bone graft were followed up for an average of 9.3 years (range, 5-13 years). A large-diameter cup was implanted in hips with adequate osseous support, and a high hip center technique using a standard- or smaller-diameter cup was selected in hips without sufficient bone stock. Acetabular bone deficiency was segmental in 18 hips, cavitary in 30, and combined segmental and cavitary in 35. Four (5%) cups were revised again; 1 for infection, 1 for dislodgement of the polyethylene liner from the metal shell, and 2 for recurrent dislocation. No acetabular components were categorized as definitely loose at final follow-up. The current satisfactory results encourage the use of this simple technique.     

大量同种异体颗粒骨打压植骨结合多孔非骨水泥臼杯翻修髋臼大面积骨缺损的中期疗效

目的探讨同种异体颗粒骨打压植骨结合多孔非骨水泥臼杯髋臼翻修大面积髋臼骨缺损的技术要点,并随访其中期临床和影像学疗效。方法随访2004年9月-2009年8月之间连续收治的采用同种异体颗粒骨打压植骨联合非骨水泥多孔髋臼杯翻修髋臼骨缺损面积大于整个髋臼关节面50％的27例（27髋）患者。按AAOS分类标准均为AAOSⅢ型骨缺损。按Paprosky分类标准,PaproskyⅡ型19例（19髋）,PaproskyⅢ型8例（8髋）。髋臼假体与宿主自体骨接触面积均小于50％;其中有19例患者的髋臼杯全完与异体骨接触。评价术前、术后的Harris评分,肢体长度。在X线片上评价髋关节旋转中心、髋臼侧透亮线、以及植骨融合情况,并判断髋臼有无松动和移位。用Kaplan-Meier生存分析评价髋臼假体的6年生存率。结果患者均完成随访,平均随访时间（6．4±1．4）年（4～9年）。术前Harris评分为（14．9±4．4）分（6-34分）,最后随访时的Harris评分为（85．6±8．1）分（67～98分）,差异具有统计学意义意义（t=22．181,P〈0．01）。术前肢体短缩（14．7±5．1）mm（6～24mm）,术后肢体短缩（0．2±3．4）mm（-9～12mm）,差异具有统计学意义（t=19．223,P〈0．01）。术后髋关节旋转中心均在Renawat三角内。所有病例术后1～1．5年植入的异体骨均与宿主骨融合。无髋臼假体松动或失败。髋臼假体的6年生存率为100％（95％可信区间为0．95～1．0）。结论髋臼AAOSⅢ型、PaproskyⅡ型甚至部分Ⅲ骨缺损,只要髋臼顶及前、后柱3个方向均存在大部分的骨皮质及一定的支撑作用,即便骨缺损面积大于髋臼关节面的50％,仍可采用同种异体骨颗粒骨打压植骨结合多孔非骨水泥臼杯髋臼重建术进行修复,并可取的满意的中期疗效。     

First-time revision using impacted morsellised allograft bone with a cemented Exeter stem: radiostereometric analysis of stem migration over nine years

Previously, radiostereometric analysis following hip revision performed using impacted morsellised allograft bone and a cemented Exeter stem has shown continuous subsidence of the stem for up to five years. It is not known whether the subsidence continues thereafter. In our study, 17 of 25 consecutive osteo-arthritic patients with aseptically loose stems who underwent first-time revision using impacted morsellised allograft bone and a cemented Exeter stem were followed by yearly radiostereometric examinations for nine years. The mean subsidence at six weeks was 1.1 mm (0.1 to 2.3), from six weeks to one year 1.3 mm (0 to 2.6), from one to five years 0.7 mm (0 to 2.0), and from five to nine years 0.7 mm (0.1 to 3.1). That from six weeks to nine years was 2.7 mm (0 to 6.4) (95% confidence interval 2.0 to 3.5). The Charnley pain score significantly improved after revision, and was maintained at nine years, but walking ability deteriorated slightly as follow-up extended. Of the eight patients who were not followed for nine years, two had early subsidence exceeding 11 mm. Our findings show that in osteo-arthritic patients who undergo revision for aseptic loosening of the stem using impacted morsellised allograft bone and a cemented Exeter stem, migration of the stem continues over nine years at a slower rate after the first year, but without clinical deterioration or radiological loosening.     

Acetabular revision surgery with the LOR cup: three to 8 years' follow-up

A retrospective review was conducted to evaluate the mid-term results of the Längsovalen Revisionspfanne oblong revision cup. From July 1995 to March 2000, 41 acetabular revision surgeries were performed for aseptic loosening of the acetabular cup. The acetabular defects were classified as type 2A to 3B, according to Paprosky's criteria. Morselized bone grafts were used in 19 cases (45.2%) to fill cavitary defects. The mean postoperative follow-up was 63.5 months (range, 40-99 months). Clinical assessment at follow-up showed a significantly improved mean Harris Hip Score from 46 points preoperatively to 82.2 points postoperatively, whereas the x-ray examination did not show any sign of loosening of the cups. Data analysis showed that significantly better results were correlated with restoring the hip rotation center and reducing leg length discrepancy.     

Medium-term results with a primary cemented rotating-hinge total knee replacement. A 7- to 15-year follow-up

We reviewed 100 cemented Endo-model rotating-hinge (Waldemar Link GMBH & Co, Hamburg, Germany) total knee replacements in 80 patients with a mean age of 70 years (56 to 85) at a mean post-operative follow-up of 11 years (7 to 15). Good or excellent results were seen in 91% of knees and survival at 15 years was 96.1%. There were two deep infections, one dislocation and one supracondylar fracture. There were no peri-operative deaths and there was no loosening, malalignment, migration or wear. We consider this prosthesis to be ideally suited for the replacement of the deformed knee when the use of an unconstrained design may be questionable.     

Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schnieder antiprotrusio cage and cancellous allograft bone

A retrospective review of 25 patients who underwent 28 acetabular revisions with the Burch—Schnieder antiprotrusio cage (Protek, Berne, Switzerland) and cancellous allograft bone was performed. Follow-up periods averaged 33 months. Patients had averaged 2.1 prior operations per hip. Twenty-two hips had American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons type III (combined segmental and cavitary bone loss) acetabular deficiency. Five hips had type II (cavitary bone loss) and one hip had type I (segmental bone loss) acetabular deficiency. After surgery, 80% of the patients had mild or no pain and 80% functioned as at least a community ambulator. Radiographic analysis included a detailed study of implant migration and the degree to which the hip center and bone stock were restored. Significant component migration was documented in 14% of the acetabular reconstructions. The hip center was improved from a preoperative side-to-side difference of 12.5 mm to 4.9 mm at final evaluation (P = .01). Average medial wall bone stock was improved from 1.9 mm before surgery to 10.1 mm postrevision (P < .01). No patients required revision of the antiprotrusio cage for problems related to the acetabular reconstruction. For failed acetabular components associated with moderate to massive bone loss, the antiprotrusio cage reliably reconstituted the hip joint center and acetabular bone stock. The short-term incidence of mechanical loosening parallels that of previously reported acetabular reconstruction techniques.     

Impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture

Purpose

Patients suffering from post traumatic osteoarthritis of the acetabulum often require a total hip arthroplasty at a relatively young age. Long-term data outcome studies for this population are lacking. We report on the long-term outcome of 20 acetabular fractures in 20 patients treated with impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after a mean follow-up of 18 years (range, 12–26 years).

Methods

The group consisted of 14 males (70 %) and six females (30 %) with an average age of 53.3 years (range, 35–75 years) at time of surgery. No patients were lost to follow-up. Four patients died and three patients underwent a revision; at review 13 patients were still living with their implant in situ. Survivorship analysis was performed at 20 years follow-up for three endpoints.

Results

Survival rate with endpoint revision for any reason at 20 years postoperative was 74.7 % (95 % confidence interval (CI), 40–91 %), 80.0 % (95 % CI, 41–95 %) for endpoint aseptic loosening, and 63.9 % (95 % CI 32–84 %) for endpoint radiographic failure. Three acetabular components were revised at 14.5, 15.3, and 16.7 years postoperative. Two cups failed for aseptic loosening and one cup failed due to septic loosening. The average postoperative Harris hip score was 82 (range, 56–100).

Conclusion

Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and the use of a cemented cup after acetabular fracture is an attractive technique with acceptable long-term results and a low complication and re-operation rate.     

Acetabular revision with the bipolar prosthesis and particulate bone grafting

Acetabular revisions with bipolar prostheses and particulate bone grafting are seldom performed because of the clinical success of porous coated cementless acetabular components. When limited to cavitary defects and appropriate-sized implants, durable reconstructions with excellent clinical function can be achieved with bipolar revisions. Recalcitrant instability of total hip arthroplasty remains an indication for bipolar revisions.     

Acetabular revision with allograft and uncemented impacted cups 78 cases with 4 to 7-year results

Summary Reconstriction of the acetabulum is based on mechanically prepared cancellous allograft. Cortico-cancellous allografts are only used for repair of defects on the weight-bearing areas. The cup is simply impacted. The bone defects are classified into 4 stages. There were only 7 failures which required reoperation and 4 fair results. There were 67 excellent and good results.     

Femoral revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished tapered stem

Objective

Biological repair of femoral bone loss using bone impaction grafting. Reconstruction of the centre of rotation of the hip using a cemented stem, the size and offset of which are at the discretion of the surgeon.

Indications

Femoral implant loosening with bone loss.

Contraindications

Infection, neurological disorders, noncompliant patient.

Surgical technique

Extraction of the loose femoral implant, cortical reconstruction using meshes if required, impaction bone grafting with special instruments, cement fixation of a polished tapered stem.

Postoperative management

Individualized period of bed rest and limited weight bearing.

Results

Impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished stem were used to perform 33 femoral reconstructions. After a mean follow-up of 15 years, no femoral reconstruction had to be revised. One unrecognized intraoperative fracture healed after nonsurgical treatment, three postoperative femoral fractures healed after plate fixation with the stem left in situ. The average Harris Hip Score improved from 49 prior to surgery to 85 points thereafter. Kaplan–Meier analysis with femoral revision for any reason as the end point showed a survival rate of 100?%.     

The extent of the bone defect affects the outcome of femoral reconstruction in revision surgery with impacted bone grafting: a five- to 17-year follow-up study

We report the results of 79 patients (81 hips) who underwent impaction grafting at revision hip replacement using the Exeter femoral stem. Their mean age was 64 years (31 to 83). According to the Endoklinik classification, 20 hips had a type 2 bone defect, 40 had type 3, and 21 had type 4. The mean follow-up for unrevised stems was 10.4 years (5 to 17). There were 12 re-operations due to intra- and post-operative fractures, infection (one hip) and aseptic loosening (one hip). All re-operations affected type 3 (6 hips) and 4 (6 hips) bone defects. The survival rate for re-operation for any cause was 100% for type 2, 81.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 67.1 to 95.3) for type 3, and 70.8% (95% CI 51.1 to 90.5) for type 4 defects at 14 years. The survival rate with further revision for aseptic loosening as the end point was 98.6% (95% CI 95.8 to 100). The final clinical score was higher for patients with type 2 bone defects than type 4 regarding pain, function and range of movement. Limp was most frequent in the type 4 group (p < 0.001). The mean subsidence of the stem was 2.3 mm (SD 3.7) for hips with a type 2 defect, 4.3 mm (SD 7.2) for type 3 and 9.6 mm (SD 10.8) for type 4 (p = 0.022). The impacted bone grafting technique has good clinical results in femoral revision. However, major bone defects affect clinical outcome and also result in more operative complications.