Reoperations on the ascending aorta and aortic root: pitfalls and results in 134 patients

BACKGROUND: This analysis was performed to evaluate the results of reoperations on the ascending aorta and aortic root. METHODS: All reoperations (n = 134) on the aortic root and ascending aorta performed between February 1981 and April 1998 were retrospectively analyzed. Indications for reintervention were a true or false aneurysm (35%), acute dissection (3.0%), aortic valve stenosis and/or insufficiency (23.1%), prosthetic valve endocarditis (32.8%), and combinations (4.5%). The principal reoperations performed were aortic root replacement (composite graft, freestyle, aortic allograft, or pulmonary autograft) in 116 patients, ascending aortic replacement in 10 patients, and closure of a false aneurysm in 5 patients. Results were analyzed using univariate statistical methods. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 6.6% (8 patients). Univariate predictors of hospital death were preoperative functional class III or IV (p = 0.02), an interval of less than 6 months between the primary and actual operation (p = 0.02), preoperative creatinine level of more than 200 micromol/L (p = 0.001), acute aortic dissection (p = 0.001), intraoperative technical problems (p = 0.001), and postoperative dialysis (p = 0.001). Freedom from repetitive reoperation was 99% at 1 year and 98% at 5 and 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperations on the aortic root and ascending aorta can be performed with an early mortality which is very acceptable.     

Mid-term results of aortoplasty for dilated ascending aorta associated with aortic valve disease.

BACKGROUNDS: Dilatation of the ascending aorta concomitant with aortic valve disease is occasionally associated with progressive enlargement of the ascending aorta or acute aortic dissection (AAD). However, surgical procedure of choice for the aorta and its indication are controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 1995 to August 2001, 10 patients with a moderately dilated ascending aorta (mean diameter, 52+/-4.8 mm) underwent concurrent aortic valve replacement (AVR) and aortoplasty. The aortic valve was bicuspid in eight patients. To tailor the ascending aorta 30-35 mm in diameter, the aortic wall was partially resected along the aortotomy, and the aorta was directly closed. RESULTS: Operation time and most of other perioperative variables were comparable to those of patients who underwent isolated AVR. The aortic diameter was reduced to 36.1+/-4.1 mm. Nine patients survived to hospital discharge uneventfully, but one patient developed disruption of the suture line in the aorta and died. During follow-up, no patient suffered AAD but redilatation was observed in one patient. In the two problematic patients, the ascending aorta was larger than 55 mm, and its media was histologically abnormal. CONCLUSION: In patients with dilated ascending aorta less than 55 mm in diameter, aortoplasty can be a procedure of choice. However, a prosthetic graft replacement is recommended when the diameter of the ascending aorta is larger than 55 mm.     

Reconstruction of the ascending aorta and aortic root: experience in 45 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND: Patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta or aortic root may have associated aortic insufficiency (AI). We reviewed our experience with aortic root remodeling and reconstruction of the sino-tubular junction. METHODS: Forty-five patients were operated on between July 1995 and September 1998. Transesophageal echocardiography showed AI grade III or IV in 15 patients. Twenty-seven patients had replacement of all three sinuses, 10 of one or two sinuses. Reconstruction of the sino-tubular junction alone was performed in 8 patients. RESULTS: There was one death at 28 days. Perioperative transesophageal echocardiography showed no or discrete AI in all patients. There has been one aortic valve replacement at day 4 postoperatively for cusp repair failure. Transesophageal echocardiography in 40 patients at a mean time of 12.5 months showed no progression of AI in 38 patients, and a grade II in 2. Clinical follow-up averaged 14.5 months. There have been three late, not procedure-related deaths. Thirty-six patients are in New York Heart Association functional class I. There have been no cases of endocarditis. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic remodeling is successful in eliminating AI in patients with aortic root disease with minimal mortality and morbidity. Early echocardiography (1 year) has shown no progression of AI in 95% of cases.     

Acute dissection of the ascending aorta: first results of emergency valve sparing aortic root reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: Acute dissection of the ascending aorta requires immediate surgical intervention. In this study, we report our first results with valve sparing aortic root reconstruction removing all the diseased tissues. METHODS: From August 1995 to December 2000, 22 patients with acute aortic dissection of the ascending aorta (Stanford type A) underwent valve sparing aortic root reconstruction. Their ages ranged from 20 to 76 years (52+/-15, 68% males). Dissection was found in the ascending aorta (3 patients) or both in the ascending aorta and aortic arch (19 patients; 86%). Course and length of hospitalization, echocardiographic and clinical follow-up, complications and mortality were analysed. RESULTS: Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 212+/-56 min (134-352 min), mean aortic cross clamp time was 157+/-24 min (114-205 min). In patients undergoing additional arch replacement (n=19), circulatory arrest was 35+/-18 min (11-75 min). After reconstruction, intraoperative echocardiography showed aortic insufficiency (AI) grade 0 in 16 patients (84%) and grade 1 in three patients (16%). Stay in intensive care unit was 2.1+/-0.7 days, and postoperative hospitalization was 21+/-14.4 days. There were three perioperative deaths (14%). Mean post-operative follow-up was 18.4+/-18 months (0.4-65.4 month). One patient died 10 months postoperatively. At follow-up, no patient suffered AI grade 2 or higher, and no reoperation for aortic valve failure was necessary. All patients presented with a favorable exercise tolerance being in New York Heart Association functional class I or II. CONCLUSION: Valve sparing aortic root reconstruction in patients with type A dissection can be performed with acceptable intraoperative mortality and morbidity and excellent results during follow-up. The complete resection of the diseased aorta is particularly appealing.     

Effects of ascending aorta replacement on aortic root dilatation.

OBJECTIVE: Because of an increase of aortic root wall stress, prosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta might be a risk factor for the progressive increase of the aortic root dimension. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the aortic root diameter change and the progression of aortic valve regurgitation late after ascending aorta replacement for different ethiology. METHODS: Sixty-three late survivors after supracoronary ascending aortic replacement were evaluated. Forty-one patients were operated on for acute aortic dissecting aneurysm (group I) and 22 for chronic atherosclerotic non-dissecting aneurysm (group II). Aortic root diameter and aortic valve regurgitation were assessed echocardiografically after a mean follow-up of 63+/-31 months and were compared with those early after surgery. RESULTS: Seven patients of group I (17%) needed reoperation for aortic root dilatation or dissection. Twenty-five percent of the patients (15 of group I and 1 of group II) showed at least a 10% increase in aortic root diameter at follow-up (46.8+/-6.1 vs. 38.1+/-6.1mm, P<0.0001). Aortic root diameter increased almost exclusively in patients operated on for acute dissecting aneurysm. A significant worsening of aortic valve insufficiency with time was evident only in patients operated on for acute dissecting aneurysm with an higher incidence in those with progressive root dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: Both the increase of aortic root diameter and the progressive worsening of aortic valve insufficiency seem to justify a more aggressive treatment of the aortic root at the time of surgery for acute aortic dissecting aneurysm but not for chronic atherosclerotic non-dissecting aneurysms.     

Replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve with a composite graft: results in 25 patients.

Our experience with combined replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve with a composite prosthetic valve-Dacron tube graft in 25 patients from September, 1974, to December, 1976, is reviewed. The technique involves suture of the composite graft to the aortic annulus, to the aortic tissue surrounding the coronary ostia, and to the distal ascending aorta, closing the aortic wall over the graft before discontinuing cardiopulmonary bypass. Annuloaortic ectasia was the most common indication for operation (15 patients). Perfusion of the coronary arteries was used in the first 15 patients. In the remaining 20, internal and external myocardial cooling with one period of ischemic arrest (average, 67 minutes) was used. There was 1 hospital death (4%), and there have been 3 late deaths (12%) in the 27-month follow-up period. This technique appears to be applicable to most types of aneurysmal disease of the proximal ascending aorta associated with aortic valve incompetence. All aneurysmal tissue from the aortic annulus to the innominate artery is excluded, bleeding through the graft is eliminated, operative time is reduced, and the late results have been satisfactory to date.     

Aortic valve-sparing operations in patients with aneurysms of the aortic root or ascending aorta

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve-sparing operations are an alternative to aortic root replacement in patients with aortic root aneurysms, or aortic valve replacement and supracoronary replacement of the ascending aorta in patients with ascending aorta aneurysms and dilated sinotubular junctions with consequent aortic insufficiency. METHODS: From 1988 to 2001, 230 patients underwent aortic valve-sparing operations for aortic root aneurysms (151 patients) or ascending aortic aneurysms with aortic insufficiency (79 patients). Two types of aortic valve-sparing operations were performed in patients with aortic root aneurysms: reimplantation of the aortic valve and remodeling of the aortic root. Mean follow-up was 3.8 +/- 2.8 years. RESULTS: Patients with aortic root aneurysms were younger, had less severe aortic insufficiency, less extensive vascular disease, and better left ventricular function than patients with ascending aorta aneurysms. The 8-year survival was 83% +/- 5% for the first group and 36% +/- 14% for the second. The freedom from aortic valve reoperation at 8 years was 99% +/- 1% for the first group and 97% +/- 2% for the second. In patients who had aortic root aneurysms, 3 developed severe aortic insufficiency (AI), and 15 developed moderate AI, for an 8-year freedom from significant AI of 67% +/- 7%. But freedom from AI was 90% +/- 3% after the technique of reimplantation, and 55% +/- 6% after the technique of remodeling (p = 0.02). In patients with ascending aortic aneurysms, the freedom from AI greater than 2+ at 8 years was 67% +/- 11%. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results of aortic valve sparing for aortic root aneurysms are excellent, and reimplantation of the aortic valve may provide a more stable repair of the aortic valve than remodeling of the aortic root.     

Safe wrapping of the borderline dilated ascending aorta during aortic valve replacement

Background  

Techniques of reduction aortoplasty are widely published in the literature with conflicting results. External support seems to be an important factor in preventing recurrence but, in some cases, this technique caused erosion of the aorta because of the wrinkles the prosthesis creates in the rear side of the aorta.     

Predicting outcome after reoperative procedures on the aortic root and ascending aorta.

OBJECTIVE: Reoperations on the ascending aorta after prior aortic procedures are formidable challenges. In order to identify factors predictive of clinical outcome using a uniform surgical approach, results of a 15-year experience were reviewed. METHODS: Between 1983 and 1998, 78 reoperations on the ascending aorta were performed in 71 consecutive patients. There were 56 males and 15 females, aged 54+/-13 years (10-73 years), with a mean interval to first reoperation of 60+/-76 months (5-223 months). The original operation was replacement of ascending aorta (23), aortic valve (25), aortic root (7), ascending aorta with valve preservation (9), ascending aorta and aortic valve (7). Surgical approach included femoral vessels dissection and repeat sternotomy, with femoro-femoral bypass limited to cases of traumatic reentry. Reoperation consisted in replacement of the aortic root (48), ascending aorta (15), ascending aorta and aortic valve (6), aortic root with ascending aorta and arch (6), ascending aorta and aortic arch (3). Average aortic crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 122+/-86 and 188+/-60 min, respectively. RESULTS: Early deaths were five (7%), due to low output syndrome (3), hemorrhage (1) and sepsis (1). Mortality for emergent reoperation was significantly higher (38 vs. 3%, P=0.001). A total of 39 early complications were observed in 78 reinterventions (50%), including: traumatic reentry requiring emergent femoro-femoral bypass (4), reexploration for bleeding (4), respiratory failure (12), sepsis (5), transient neurologic dysfunction (4), renal failure (3), myocardial infarction (3), circulatory insufficiency requiring mechanical life support (2), and wound infection (2). Average intensive care unit stay was 4.5+/-9.7 days (0.5-40 days). Survival was 92+/-4%, 78+/-10% and 78+/-10% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. At follow-up (mean 34+/-36 months, 1-170), survivors were in satisfactory clinical conditions (1.6+/-0. 8 mean NYHA class, 1-3) with no evidence of renal, respiratory or neurologic dysfunction. Multivariable analysis showed emergent reoperation (P=0.001), prior aortic valve replacement (P=0.005) and need for arch replacement (P=0.03) to be predictive of higher operative mortality. Longer duration of bypass (P=0.01) and aortic arch replacement (P=0.04) were predictive of higher prevalence of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperations on the ascending aorta via repeat sternotomy without preventive femoral bypass are associated with low operative risk and high prevalence early complications. Emergent reintervention due to aortic dissection, particularly in patients with prior aortic valve replacement, and need for arch repair are predictive of poorer perioperative outcome. Long-term outlook of hospital survivors is satisfactory.     

Evaluation of composite graft replacement of the aortic root and ascending aorta

Replacement of the entire aortic root and ascending aorta with a composite graft was done in 7 patients with ascending aortic aneurysm and aortic regurgitation. There was no worrisome postoperative bleeding, and follow-up aortography has demonstrated correction of the aortic root disease in all patients and no complications referable to the coronary artery implantation.     

Replacement of ascending aorta with aortic valve reimplantation: midterm results

Objective: Aneurysms of the aortic root lead to aortic valve incompetence due to dilatation of the sinotubular junction and annuloaortic ectasia. Reimplantation of the native, structurally intact aortic valve within a Dacron tube graft corrects annular ectasia as well as dilatation of sinotubular junction and aortic sinuses. Durability of this valve repair with respect to increased mechanical stress on valve cusps is discussed controversially and is yet unknown. Methods: Since 7/93, replacement of the ascending aorta with repair of the aortic valve was performed in 48 patients (34 male, 14 female; 47±20 years) with aortic insufficiency and aneurysm of the aortic root. Fifteen patients (31%) had Marfan's syndrome and five patients (10%) had an aortic dissection type A (two acute, three chronic). In 11 patients (23%), concomitant replacement of the aortic arch was necessary utilizing elephant trunk technique in two patients. Additionally, one patient required mitral valve repair and two other patients coronary artery bypass grafts. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed in 6–12 month intervals for a cumulative study period of 100 patient years. Results: There were no operative deaths. Two patients (4%) died 5 and 20 months postoperatively. One additional patient experienced a TIA within the first postoperative week. Three patients (6%) with an early postoperative aortic insufficiency (AI)>1 required aortic valve replacement after 9, 11, and 14 months due to progressive AI. In these patients, distortion of the aortic root geometry led to valve incompetence. All other patients have no or mild aortic insufficiency. The repair now remains stable for up to 63 months (mean 25±18 months). Other valve related complications did not occur. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that this type of aortic valve repair achieves excellent results in selected patients. Perfect coaptation of valve cusps during the repair with no or only trace AI at initial echocardiography seems to be essential for durability.     

Preassembled stentless valved-conduit for the replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic root

Here we report the early clinical results of a new preassembled stentless valved-conduit incorporating artificial sinuses of Valsalva (BioValsalva). This new composite conduit incorporates a stentless porcine aortic valve (Elan, Vascutek Terumo, UK) suspended within a triple-layered vascular conduit (Triplex, Vascutek Terumo, UK) constructed with sinuses of Valsalva. Between December 2006 and January 2008, 17 patients with the mean age of 65 years underwent aortic valve, root and ascending aorta replacement with the BioValsalva valved-conduit. There was no perioperative mortality. There were no myocardial infarctions, cardiac failure or cerebrovascular events. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 156+/-56 min and ischemic time was 112+/-33 min. Eight patients required deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for additional distal ascending aorta replacement. Mean mediastinal drainage was 499+/-262 ml. Postoperative transthoracic echocardiography and CT-scans of the aorta in all patients before discharge demonstrated well-functioning prosthetic aortic valves with small residual mean gradients, no regurgitation, and the presence of sinuses of Valsalva. In conclusion, the novel prefabricated, composite stentless valved-conduit BioValsalva possesses excellent hemodynamic performance and can be implanted with low morbidity. In addition, the conduit material has good hemostatic properties which reduced bleeding, and is easy to implant with a variety of surgical techniques.     

The calcified ascending aorta in aortic valve replacement: surgical strategies and results

Purpose

Calcification in the ascending aorta may constitute a major problem during aortic valve replacement (AVR). We examined the distributions of calcification and the associated operative strategies.

Materials and methods

Between 1999 and 2012, 207 consecutive, elderly patients underwent isolated AVR at our center. Computed tomographic scan data were available for all patients, and 105 were found to have at least one segment of calcification. Aortic calcifications were based on the section of the aorta that was calcified: distal, middle, and proximal of the ascending aorta.

Results

Forty-six patients had calcification in the distal zone. In these patients, conventional cannulation was performed in 26 patients, with an associated in-hospital mortality of 7.7 %. Arterial cannulation site was changed from the ascending aorta to somewhere in 20 patients (including other aortic sites in 9 patients, femoral artery in 7 patients, and both femoral and innominate arteries in 4 patients), without any patient deaths. Middle zone calcifications were observed in 70 patients: 63 underwent conventional cross-clamping with particular care (7.9 % mortality), 5 underwent cross-clamping under direct vision during hypothermic circulatory arrest, and 2 underwent balloon occlusion. None of the patients undergoing substitute cross-clamping died. Proximal calcifications were observed in 66 patients; 47 patients underwent conventional transverse aortotomy, with an associated mortality of 8.5 %.

Conclusion

Although the 8.3 % mortality rate in patients undergoing conventional procedures was not negligible, it was lower than the expected 25.9 % estimated by the patient EuroSCOREs. The conventional procedure results are reasonable, but may require a substitute procedure in some cases.