Felbamate Monotherapy: Implications for Antiepileptic Drug Development

Summary: We studied the effect of felbamate (FBM) monotherapy on seizure rate in patients with partial and secondarily generalized seizures undergoing presurgical monitoring at a single site. The study design was a double-blind placebo-controlled parallel monotherapy trial. Forty patients whose seizures had not been controlled by standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were randomized. Seizure type was confirmed by video-EEG monitoring. All baseline AEDs were discontinued, and patients were drug-free for 5.3 ± 2.4 days before randomization to FBM or placebo. After a 4-day titration, seizures were counted for 14 days. Patients receiving FBM had significantly lower seizure rates, whether all randomized patients, patients who survived titration, or study completers were compared. Eight of 19 placebo patients randomized to placebo, as compared with 13 of 21 receiving FBM, completed the 18-day study. Two FBM patients dropped out due to seizures, and 6 dropped out due to side effects, including anxiety, difficulty sleeping, abdominal discomfort, acute psychosis, and orobuccal dyskinesias. Ten placebo patients met the criteria for premature discontinuation owing to seizures, and 1 had an episode of panic. There was no evidence of hepatic or hematologic toxicity. FBM reduces seizure frequency in patients with localization-related epilepsy.     

Felbamate in the Treatment of Refractory Partial-Onset Seizures

Summary: Felbamate (FBM) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) that has been tested in open and controlled studies in patients with therapy-refractory partial-onset seizures. Proof of efficacy is based on results of five controlled studies (three with polytherapy and two with monotherapy). In two of the three polytherapy studies, a classic placebo crossover design was used. The third study used a novel design evaluating the efficacy of FBM in a placebo-controlled parallel design in patients completing an evaluation for epilepsy surgery. The primary efficacy variable in this study was the number of patients who experienced a fourth seizure before the end of the study. Forty-six percent of patients randomized to FBM stopped treatment prematurely because of the occurrence of a fourth seizure compared with 88% randomized to placebo. Two studies investigating the efficacy in monotherapy were performed. Both studies used an identical trial design comparing FBM with a low dosage of valproate (VPA). The efficacy of FBM was found to be superior to the low-dosage VPA for both studies. Open long-term follow-up studies have confirmed the long-term efficacy of FBM for up to 12 months. Overall, FBM was well tolerated in both poly- and monotherapy.     

Epilepsy and antiepileptic drug therapy in juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

PURPOSE: To survey the characteristics of epilepsy in patients with juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (JNCL) and determine the antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment most suitable for these patients. METHODS: The study included 60 patients with JNCL; their mean age was 16.5 years (range 5-33). The age at onset of epilepsy, type of seizures, effect of the first AED on seizures, and the current seizure frequency and AED therapy were studied. The side effects of the AEDs were also clarified. RESULTS: Fifty of the 60 patients had epilepsy. Patients' first epileptic seizure occurred at a mean age of 10.0 years (range 5-16), the most common type being generalized seizures. As the first AED tried, valproate (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG) appeared equally effective, with 80% of the patients responding to these AEDs. During the study year, the median seizure frequency was four seizures a year (range 0-120), and 72% of the patients had good or satisfactory seizure control (0-6 seizures a year). In the different AED therapy groups, the proportion of patients with good or satisfactory seizure control ranged from 25% to 100%. LTG in monotherapy or in combination with clonazepam (CZP) was superior to other AEDs or combinations, but VPA also seemed effective. Adverse effects leading to the discontinuation of an AED were observed in 25% of the patients, most frequently in patients receiving phenobarbital (PB). No patient receiving LTG had to discontinue the drug due to adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Epilepsy in JNCL can usually be successfully treated with the current AEDs. In Finnish patients with JNCL, treatment is based on LTG, or, secondarily, VPA. In combination therapy, CZP seems a valuable add-on AED.     

Influence on ictal seizure semiology of rapid withdrawal of carbamazepine and valproate in monotherapy

PURPOSE: To quantify changes in ictal seizure semiology during rapid withdrawal of carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproate (VPA) from a monoregimen in presurgical evaluation. METHODS: Therapeutic intensive seizure analysis (TISA) with video-EEG monitoring was used in 33 patients with pharmacoresistant partial epilepsy undergoing complete withdrawal of CBZ (20 patients) or VPA (13 patients) from a monoregimen. Monitoring phases included a 3-day baseline phase, a 3-day rapid antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal phase, and another 3-day AED-free phase with AEDs in subtherapeutic levels. Seizure variables as complete processes and their various elements (ictal signs) were analyzed, including duration (seconds), intensity (on a scale of 0 to 3), frequency (number per 3 days), and total duration of seizures and ictal signs in 3 days (seconds). The localization of seizure patterns on ictal EEG recording (EEG seizure onset) and the first appearing clinical ictal phenomena (initial ictal signs) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 188 seizures in the CBZ group and 57 seizures in the VPA group were investigated. Compared with the baseline phase, the CBZ group showed increases in duration, frequency of seizures, various ictal signs, and secondarily generalized tonic and clonic signs during the following two phases. Significantly increased values of the VPA group were observed in seizure duration and frequency of hypermotoric phenomena during the AED-free phase. More patients in the CBZ group had secondarily generalized clonic signs during the AED-free phase. EEG seizure onset and initial ictal signs showed no obvious changes between study phases. CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal of CBZ is followed more quickly by an increase of seizure frequency and severity than is the case for VPA withdrawal. Both CBZ and VPA withdrawal influences seizure propagation rather than the seizure-onset characteristics, which speaks in favor of its use in presurgical evaluation.     

The efficacy of felbamate as add-on therapy to valproic acid in the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

We studied the efficacy of felbamate (FBM) in combination with valproic acid (VPA) in 13 patients with the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and evaluated the contribution of each drug. Following stabilization on VPA monotherapy, FBM or placebo titration was performed for two observation periods lasting 7 weeks with a washout period between them. 6-h video-electroencephalography was recorded following each observation period. In addition to examining the effects of the drugs with parental reports and video-EEG, we compared video-EEG data with families' seizure reports. Based on parental counts for the 7-week observation periods, patients had 40% fewer drop attacks (p < 0.03, Wilcoxon rank sum test) and 60% fewer total seizures (p < 0.02) on VPA and FBM. VPA level rose by 12.7% when FBM was added (p < 0.01). When the effect of FBM was factored out, VPA had a significant effect on drop attack frequency, although not total number of seizures. FBM's therapeutic effect on drop attacks is due in part to increased VPA levels, although the combination may be synergistic for the effect on total seizure number.     

Felbamate in the Treatment of Partial-Onset Seizures

Summary: Felbamate (FBM, Felbatol/Taloxa) has been the object of several trials that are innovative and unique. First, FBM is the first antiepileptic drug (AED) to have been submitted to a controlled efficacy study in patients with the Len-nox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) before being submitted for regulatory approval. Second, FBM was tested in patients discontinued from other AEDs for presurgical monitoring. Third, FBM was the first experimental AED to have been tested in controlled monotherapy trials. Overall, these studies succeeded in demonstrating that FBM is relatively safe and effective against both partial-onset seizures and the generalized seizures occurring in the LGS. The results of some of these studies could not always be expressed by using the more familiar concept of percent seizure reduction because, for ethical reasons, the efficacy variable had to be defined in terms of time to the n^lh seizure or in terms of escape criteria. This may make it more difficult to evaluate just how effective FBM is in comparison with other AEDs. Another reason why the efficacy of FBM cannot yet be fully assessed is that in all the studies the FBM dosage was limited to a maximum of 3,600 mg/day or 45 mg/kg/day. At this dosage, FBM produced no toxicity in the majority of patients, and its full therapeutic effect may have to be re-evaluated in the future at higher dosages.     

Felbamate in the Treatment of Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: Results of a 12-Month Open-Label Study Following a Randomized Clinical Trial

Summary: Felbamate (FBM) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) that has been evaluated in partial seizures and in the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). When tested against placebo in an add-on, randomized, double-blind trial in 73 children with LGS, FBM significantly reduced the frequencies of astatic (atonic) seizures and generalized tonic-clonic seizures plus total seizure counts. In addition, FBM-treated subjects improved significantly on a parent-rated global evaluation and had fewer injuries. Overall, ˜50% of subjects experienced a 50% or greater reduction in total seizure frequency and a dose-response relationship was apparent. The improvement that occurred in the double-blind study has been sustained for at least 12 months in subsequent open-label follow-up studies. In the first month of FBM treatment, 62% of the subjects who had previously received placebo had a reduction in total seizure frequency of >50%. By the 12-month follow-up point, approximately half of the patients had a 50% reduction in total seizure count. Astatic seizures responded even better, with two-thirds of patients having a reduction of >50% in astatic seizure frequency after 12 months of treatment. Based on adverse experience reports thus far, FBM appears to be well tolerated. FBM is the first drug to be shown effective in the LGS in randomized controlled trials. Although few subjects with LGS became seizure free, the frequency of the most severe seizure types decreased and the patients' global functioning improved.     

Felbamate for refractory absence seizures

We treated 10 patients (aged 5–37 years) with medically refractory absence seizures with felbamate (FBM). Average duration of absence seizures was 16.2 years. All patients continued to have absence seizures at maximally tolerated doses of valproic acid and/or ethosuximide. At maximal FBM dosage (45 mg/kg/day or 3,600 mg/day), there was at least a 65% reduction in absence seizure frequency in eight patients; in four, there was a > 95% reduction. Mean duration of FBM therapy is 16.2 months (range, 5–31 months). Nine patients remain on FBM. Two patients are on FBM monotherapy; seven others are on FBM and one or two other antiepileptic drugs. FBM was discontinued in one patient who developed severe insomnia followed by a return to baseline absence seizure frequency after an initial good response, and an increase in generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). Three other patients also had a history of GTCS; in one there has been no significant change, whereas two have not had a GTCS during FBM therapy. Eight patients continue to have a clinically meaningful reduced absence seizure frequency, and eight patients reported fewer adverse effects with their current regimen including FBM. Tachyphylaxis to the antiabsence efficacy was observed in four cases. These preliminary findings suggest that FBM is useful in treating absence seizures.     

Association between antiepileptic drug dose and long-term response in patients with refractory epilepsy

Seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy remain a substantial clinical challenge, not least because of the dearth of evidence-based guidelines as to which antiepileptic drug (AED) regimens are the most effective, and what doses of these drugs to employ. We sought to determine whether there were regions in the dosage range of commonly used AEDs that were associated with superior efficacy in patients with refractory epilepsy. We retrospectively analyzed treatment records from 164 institutionalized, developmentally disabled patients with refractory epilepsy, averaging 17 years of followup per patient. We determined the change in seizure frequency in within-patient comparisons during treatment with the most commonly used combinations of 12 AEDs, and then analyzed the response to treatment by quartile of the dose range for monotherapy with carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), valproate (VPA), or phenytoin (PHT), and the combination LTG/VPA. We found that of the 26 most frequently used AED regimens, only LTG/VPA yielded superior efficacy, similar to an earlier study. For the monotherapies, patients who were treated in the lowest quartile of the dose range had significantly better long-term reduction in seizure frequency compared to those treated in the 2nd and 3rd quartiles of the dose range. Patients with paired exposures to CBZ in both the lowest quartile and a higher quartile of dose range experienced an increase in seizure frequency at higher doses, while patients treated with LTG/VPA showed improved response with escalation of LTG dosage. We conclude that in this population of patients with refractory epilepsy, LTG/VPA was the most effective AED combination. The best response to AEDs used in monotherapy was observed at low dosage. This suggests that routine exposure to maximally tolerated AED doses may not be necessary to identify those patients with drug-resistant seizures who will have a beneficial response to therapy. Rather, responders to a given AED regimen may be identified with exposure to low AED doses, with careful evaluation of the response to subsequent titration to identify non-responders or those with exacerbation of seizure frequency at higher doses.     

Improved quality of life in patients with partial seizures after conversion to oxcarbazepine monotherapy

OBJECTIVE: Quality of life (QOL) was assessed in patients who switched to oxcarbazepine monotherapy because of the lack of efficacy or poor tolerability of their current antiepileptic drug (AED). METHOD: This open-label, single-arm study consisted of patients aged 12 >or= years with partial onset seizures. Oxcarbazepine (8-10mg/kg/day for children, 600 mg/day for adults) was titrated up over 4 weeks while the existing AED was tapered off. QOL was evaluated at baseline and end of study (Week 16) using the validated-in-epilepsy QOLIE-31 questionnaire. RESULTS: For all patients who completed the QOLIE-31 at baseline and completion, a statistically significant improvement was noted for both the composite and multi-item subscale QOL scores (P<0.05 vs baseline). Statistically significant mean percentage improvements of >or=10% from baseline (range=10.8-50.1%) were also noted. Significant improvements were seen in health-related QOL for patients who experienced seizure freedom or >or=50% reductions in seizure frequency with oxcarbazepine monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with partial seizures who switched to oxcarbazepine monotherapy showed statistically significant, clinically relevant improvements in QOL.     

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of oxcarbazepine monotherapy

OBJECTIVE: This prospective, open-label, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of oxcarbazepine as monotherapy in patients with partial seizures who switched from their current antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy because of lack of efficacy or poor tolerability. METHOD: Patients (>or=12 years old) experiencing 2-40 seizures per month while receiving an AED were included. During a 16-week treatment phase, oxcarbazepine was initiated (8-10mg/kg for children; 600 mg/day for adults) and titrated up over 4 weeks while the existing AED was tapered off. Improvement in seizure frequency (defined as >or=50% reduction compared with baseline) was evaluated for all patients, as well as the subgroups of patients switched due to poor tolerability or lack of efficacy. RESULTS: Overall, 52% of patients experienced a 50% reduction in seizure frequency, 35% had a >or=75% reduction, and 18% were seizure-free. The most frequent (>10%) adverse events were dizziness, nausea, headache, somnolence, and fatigue. Overall, 17% of patients prematurely withdrew because of an adverse event; 62% of these withdrawals occurred during the conversion period. CONCLUSION: Oxcarbazepine as monotherapy may be a favorable treatment option for patients with partial seizures or poor tolerability of their existing monotherapy regimen.     

Concomitant use of divalproex sodium and lamotrigine in developmentally disabled patients with epilepsy: a retrospective evaluation of efficacy and tolerability

Objective. Epilepsy in institutionalized severe developmentally disabled patients poses a therapeutic challenge. Frequently these patients have multiple seizure (sz) types that are often intractable. Both divalproex sodium (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG) have demonstrated efficacy. We sought to examine the efficacy of this specific combination in a group of institutionalized, developmentally disabled patients with epilepsy.Methods. Medical and pharmacy records of all patients with developmental disabilities and intractable seizures were reviewed to identify those who had received VPA and LTG. This retrospective evaluation was structured with respect to time frame and outcome measure. Phase 1 consisted of baseline monotherapy with VPA. Phase 2 consisted of titration/dose escalation. Phase 3 was treatment observation period with the combination of both. Seizure frequency and adverse effect data were obtained from nursing or residential staff records. Primary outcome measures were change in seizure frequency between Phases 1 and 3. Additional measures were percentage of patients seizure-free and those with >75% reduction in seizures. A Wilcoxan signed rank test was used for statistical analysis.Results. Of 293 patients, 25 (12M/13F, 31.7+/-10.2 years) had VPA monotherapy following which LTG was added. Mean doses of VPA and LTG were 1474+/-728 and 165+/-111mg/day, respectively. Baseline seizure frequency ranged from 1 to 25 per month. Mean seizure frequency significantly decreased (6.5+/-vs2.0+/-4.0seizures/month, P<0.001). Sixty-four percent of these patients had >/=75% reduction in seizures 28% became seizure-free.Conclusions. The combination of VPA and LTG appears efficacious in this group of developmentally disabled patients with intractable seizures. Rash, which has been associated with this combination, was notably absent and this may reflect the slower titration schedule used.     

Double-blind substitution of vigabatrin and valproate in carbamazepine-resistant partial epilepsy. 012 Study group

Patients from 12 countries reporting two or more partial seizures per month despite treatment with optimal doses of CBZ were randomised to additional vigabatrin (VGB, 2-4 g daily) or sodium valproate (VPA, 1-2 g daily) using a double-blind, double-dummy design. The study included a 6 month retrospective baseline on unchanged CBZ dosage, a month's prospective baseline, a short titration phase, and an assessment period lasting 3 months on duotherapy. CBZ was withdrawn over a further 2 months in responders ( > or = 50% monthly seizure reduction compared with baseline), who continued on alternative monotherapy for 3 or more months. If seizure control deteriorated, CBZ was reinstated and these patients were also followed up for 3 months. A total of 215 patients (108 VGB, 107 VPA) reporting a mean of seven partial seizures per month fulfilled the criteria for the intention-to-treat analysis. 53 and 51% of patients in the VGB and VPA group respectively achieved a monthly reduction in seizure numbers > or = 50%, respectively. 27 and 31% maintained alternative monotherapy. Overall, 17% (7% monotherapy, 10% duotherapy) of the VGB treated patients and 19% (8% monotherapy, 11% duotherapy) of the VPA group remained seizure-free during the final 3 month treatment period. VGB and VPA, which increase neuronal inhibition mediated by gamma aminobutyric acid, can be added to or substituted for CBZ when this Na+ channel blocker fails to control partial seizures. This lends credence to the hypothesis in support of a mechanistic approach to the management of epilepsy.     

Valproate Monotherapy in 30 Patients with Partial Seizures

This retrospective pilot study describes 30 patients diagnosed and treated for complex partial seizures (CPS) and simple partial seizures (SPS) with and without generalization who received valproate (VPA) monotherapy after lack of response or allergic reaction for carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), or phenobarbital (PB). Seizures were tabulated daily on seizure calendars by the patients. Three time periods were examined for seizure frequency, 90 days before VPA treatment and 90 and 180 days after VPA treatment. Twenty-two were "controlled" or "improved" (reduction of seizure activity by greater than or equal to 51%) 6 months following the initiation of VPA. VPA was particularly effective in 17 patients who had secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) as a subtype of partial seizures. Failure of response to VPA in eight patients appears to be related to their type of partial seizure (SPS or CPS alone, without GTCS) and duration of uncontrolled recurrent seizures. Etiology and compliance were not related to treatment failure. This study supports the need for a double-blind controlled trial with VPA in patients with partial seizures.     

Tiagabine Monotherapy in the Treatment of Partial Epilepsy

Summary: Three studies were conducted to assess tiagabine (TGB) hydrochloride monotherapy in patients with partial seizures. The first was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 11 patients (seven TGB, four placebo) undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Baseline antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy was discontinued abruptly before monotherapy. Although 24-h seizure rates increased during monotherapy in both groups, patients receiving TGB experienced fewer seizures than placebo patients. Subsequent studies (an open-label, dose-ranging study; n = 31 and a double-blind, randomized comparison of 6 and 36 mg/day TGB; n = 102 and 96, respectively) involved discontinuation of baseline AEDs. In the dose-ranging study, 19 of 31 patients (61%) converted to TGB monotherapy, with a mean final dose of 38.4 mg/day (range 24–54 mg/day) in those who completed the study ( n = 12). In the low- vs. high-dosage study, median 4-week complex partial seizure rates decreased significantly in patients from both dose groups who completed the monotherapy period ( p <0.05 compared with baseline). In the intent-to-treat analysis, significantly more patients in the high-dose group experienced a reduction in seizures of at least 50% compared with the low-dose group ( p = 0.038). Overall, the types of adverse events with TGB monotherapy were similar to those observed in add-on trials. These initial trials in difficult-to-treat epilepsy patients indicate that TGB monotherapy may provide a new approach to the treatment of patients with partial seizures refractory to other AEDs.     

Felbamate: A Clinical Trial for Complex Partial Seizures

We performed a randomized, double-blind, three-period cross-over study of felbamate (FBM, 2-phenyl-1,3-propanediol dicarbamate: Carter-Wallace 554) in patients with complex partial seizures. Patients continued carbamazepine (CBZ) throughout the study and were observed in the hospital for the entire trial period. The entry criteria required at least six seizures in a 3-week baseline period (and no more than 1 week with a single seizure) with CBZ alone. Thirty subjects were randomized. Two left the study after randomization, 1 owing to seizure exacerbation, and 1 owing to hyponatremia, which may have been related to CBZ therapy. The daily dosage of 50 mg/kg (maximum 3,000 mg) FBM per day was well tolerated by all 28 patients who completed the study. Only mild adverse experience were observed during the trial. FBM reduced CBZ level (p less than 0.0001; 95% confidence interval -28%, -20%). There was no significant difference in seizure frequency between placebo and FBM periods (one-sided p = 0.172), but when a correction was made for the lower CBZ level noted during FBM periods, the data suggested a strong antiseizure effect of FBM.     

Efficacy of anti-epileptic drugs in patients with gliomas and seizures

Although seizures in brain tumor patients are common, the knowledge on optimal anti-seizure therapy in this patient group is limited. An observational study was carried out using a database of all patients from the neuro-oncology service during the period 2000–2005, with data on seizure characteristics, therapy with AEDs, the underlying brain tumor and its treatment. A total of 140 brain tumor patients were studied of whom 23.6% had a low-grade glioma, 53.6% a high-grade glioma, and 22.8% belonged to a mixed group existing of ependymoma, meningioma, and brain metastasis. Epilepsy as the presenting sign was more frequent in low-grade vs. high-grade gliomas (69.7 vs. 52%, P = 0.087), and a total of 75.8% of patients developed seizures with low-grade and of 80.0% with high-grade gliomas. Of all 99 patients with seizures, 80.1% received valproic acid (VPA) as first choice, and either levetiracetam (LEV), carbamazepine (CBZ) or lamotrigine (LMT) as the most frequent next choice. Patients treated with a combination of VPA and LEV showed the highest percentage of responders (81.5%), with a decline in seizure frequency of more than two categories in 55.6% and seizure freedom in 59%. No correlation was found between the use of VPA and survival. A combination of VPA and LEV seems effective, if seizure control cannot be achieved by VPA alone. This indicates that adding levetiracetam may be preferable over sequential trials of AED monotherapy in treatment-resistant seizures in patients with brain tumors.     

Conversion from valproic acid onto topiramate in adolescents and adults with epilepsy

Objective – To explore efficacy and tolerability outcomes of topiramate (TPM) in patients with epilepsy transitioning from valproic acid (VPA) because of insufficient efficacy and/or tolerability onto TPM. Methods – Multicenter, open label, single arm, non‐interventional study examining patients (≥12 years) with epilepsy, transitioning onto TPM from baseline mono‐or combination therapy with VPA. TPM was added onto the existing antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment and started at a dose of 25 mg once daily. The dose was titrated up with 25 mg/day increments, once every 1–2 weeks, until a final dose between 50–200 mg/day was reached. Based on clinical judgment, the treating physician decided whether or not and when the existing AED treatment especially with VPA could be withdrawn. Documented were type and frequency of seizures, TPM dose, quality of life (QOLIE‐10 questionnaire), subjective perception of improvement, and adverse events (AE). Results – One hundered and forty‐seven patients (59% women, mean age 41 years) switched from baseline VPA treatment onto TPM because of insufficient efficacy (61%) and/or poor tolerability (81%). Average duration of follow‐up was 20.3 weeks with an overall discontinuation rate of 16.3% of patients, mainly because of AE (in 8.2% of 147 patients). At study endpoint, the intended shift to TPM monotherapy was achieved in 70% of patients at a median dose of 150 mg/day. A seizure reduction of ≥50% was achieved in 75% of patients in the last scheduled period (week 8–20), and 51% of patients entering that period remained seizure‐free. Quality of life improved significantly as compared with baseline for all domains of QOLIE‐10 (P < 0.001). Most frequent AEs were weight decrease (4.8%), paraesthesia and fatigue (4.1% each), speech disorder and headaches (2.7% each). Conclusions – In patients with epilepsy not satisfactorily treated with VPA, conversion to TPM was associated with improved seizure control as well as improvement in several aspects of quality of life.     

Therapy of Infantile Spasms with Valproate: Results of a Prospective Study

In a prospective study, 22 children with recently manifested infantile spasms (18 patients with symptomatic and 4 with idiopathic infantile spasms) were treated with sodium valproate (VPA). Before VPA was instituted, a loading test was performed to exclude abnormal patterns of VPA metabolites by gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy of serum and urine. This test was repeated during VPA therapy; an abnormal pattern of VPA metabolites was not observed. VPA was started in increasing dosage until infantile spasms were controlled or a maximum dose of 100 mg/kg/day was reached. If VPA did not control seizures or at least reduce frequency significantly after a trial of 4-6 weeks, dexamathasone was added to VPA. If focal seizures occurred in association with localized epileptogenic EEG discharges, carbamazepine (CBZ) was added to VPA. After 4 weeks of VPA monotherapy, infantile spasms were controlled in 11 children. After 3 months of therapy, 16 children were free of seizures (14 patients VPA monotherapy), and 4 children had reduction of seizure frequency to less than 25%. VPA doses varied between 40 and 100 mg/kg/day (mean 74). The mean plasma concentration was 113 micrograms/ml (range 46-177). After 6 months of therapy, total seizure control was achieved in 20 of 22 patients (16 children VPA monotherapy). The mean observation time was 16 1/2 months (range 6-36 months). There were seven relapses in six children during the first 7 months of therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Efficacy and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs in an Omani epileptic population

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this hospital-based study is to get an insight into the efficacy and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs (AED) in Omani epileptic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All Omani patients (aged 14 years and above) suffering from epileptic seizures for at least 2 years and followed-up by board-certified neurologists in Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) were evaluated. The treatment retention rate since first visit at SQUH and over the last 2 years was used as primary efficacy measure of AED therapy. Change in seizure-frequency and side effect profiles were also assessed. RESULTS: In this population of 203 confirmed epileptic patients, generalized tonic-clonic (40%) and partial seizures (39%) were most commonly observed, idiopathic/cryptogenic origin (81%) being the most frequent encountered origin. Sixty one percent of the patients were controlled with an AED in monotherapy and overall 34% of patients could be successfully maintained on monotherapy during the whole follow-up period at SQUH (median 6 years). The treatment retention rates for carbamazepine (CBZ) at a daily dose of 400-600 mg, sodium valproate (VPA) at a daily dose of 500-1000 mg, and phenytoin (PHT) at a daily dose of 300 mg, in monotherapy over the total follow-up period was 51, 50, and 21%, respectively. In contrast, over the last 2 years these rates were highest for VPA (91%) followed by CBZ (83%) and PHT (73%). Adverse drug reactions were recorded in 67% of patients, and were most commonly encountered with VPA. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher adverse effect profile for VPA, long-term treatment with CBZ and VPA appeared to be equally effective in terms of treatment retention rates and seizure control.