Racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer survival

BACKGROUND: The reasons for race/ethnicity (R/E) differences in breast cancer survival have been difficult to disentangle. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data were used to identify 41,020 women aged > or =68 years with incident breast cancer between 1994-1999 including African American (2479), Hispanic (1172), Asian/Pacific Island (1086), and white women (35,878). A Cox proportional hazards model assessed overall and stage-specific (0/I, II/III, and IV) R/E differences in breast cancer survival after adjusting for mammography screening, tumor characteristics at diagnosis, biologic markers, treatment, comorbidity, and demographics. RESULTS: African American women had worse survival than white women, although controlling for predictor variables reduced this difference among all stage breast cancer (hazards ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.97-1.20). Adjustment for predictors reduced, but did not eliminate, disparities in the analysis limited to women diagnosed with stage II/III disease (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.10-1.54). Screening mammography, tumor characteristics at diagnosis, biologic markers, and treatment each produced a similar reduction in HRs for women with stage II/III cancers. Asian and Pacific Island women had better survival than white women before and after accounting for all predictors (adjusted all stages HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.47-0.79]; adjusted stage II/III HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.47-0.79]). Hispanic women had better survival than white women in all and stage II/III analysis (all stage HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75-1.04) and stage II/III analysis (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75-1.04), although these findings did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant difference in survival by R/E noted among women diagnosed with stage IV disease. CONCLUSIONS: Predictor variables contribute to, but do not fully explain, R/E differences in breast cancer survival for elderly American women. Future analyses should further investigate the role of biology, demographics, and disparities in quality of care.     

Racial/ethnic differences in survival among elderly patients with a primary glioblastoma

Background Few studies have assessed racial/ethnic differences in survival after primary glioblastoma diagnosis. We investigate these differences, incorporating information on White, Hispanics and Asians, as well as White, non-Hispanics and Blacks, among elderly individuals with a primary glioblastoma utilizing the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program-Medicare linked database. Methods A total of 1,530 individuals diagnosed > = 66 years of age from 6/1/91 to 12/31/99 in the SEER data were linked with Medicare information from 1/1/91 to 12/31/01. All individuals had Medicare Parts A and B and were non-HMO for 6 months before and 12 months after diagnosis to gather pre-diagnosis co-morbidities and post-diagnosis first course of treatment. Survival differences by race/ethnicity and by race/ethnicity stratified by treatment type and/or median household income were examined using Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results Significant racial/ethnic differences existed between White, non-Hispanics and Blacks in marital status, income and SEER registry region for the entire US. In analysis limited to the West region, significant racial/ethnic differences existed for income only. Overall there were no differences in survival between White, non-Hispanics and Blacks, however, in analysis limited to the West region, Asians had a lower risk of death compared to White, non-Hispanics [HR = 0.67, 95% CI (0.43, 1.03)]. Asians who had multiple treatments also had a lower risk of death compared to White, non-Hispanics [HR = 0.65, 95% CI (0.41, 1.01)]. Conclusions Racial/ethnic differences in survival after primary glioblastoma diagnosis exist and may be partially explained by racial/ethnic differences in treatment and income. Dr Barnholtz-Sloan has now moved to a new institution, but this study was performed while she was at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute     

Racial/ethnic differences in survival rates in a population-based series of men with breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: A rare occurrence, about 1500 men in the United States develop breast carcinoma each year. Little is known about survival patterns at the population level, particularly about racial/ethnic variation. METHODS: Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, we examined survival rates in 1979 men diagnosed with primary invasive breast carcinoma between 1973 and 1997. Race was defined as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and other race/ethnicity (predominantly Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic). The two outcomes were all-cause and breast carcinoma- specific mortality. Survival curves were drawn using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression was used to estimate the risk of death with hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. For both outcomes, the racial/ethnic survival curves differed significantly when the log rank test was used. Therefore, separate models were run for each racial/ethnic group. Covariates included age, stage, histology, surgery, radiation therapy, and year of diagnosis. Estrogen and progesterone receptor status were available for 616 men. RESULTS: Survival rates differed significantly by race/ethnicity. Overall, 5-year survival rates were 66% for whites, 57% for blacks, and 75% for men of other race/ethnicity. Blacks presented with more advanced disease. By stage, whites and blacks had worse survival rates compared with men of other race/ethnicity. The effects of prognostic factors such as age, surgery type, and radiation were similar, but not always significant, for all groups. Diagnosis year and estrogen receptor status did not affect survival. CONCLUSIONS: Survival following male breast carcinoma differed by race/ethnicity, whereas the prognostic factors associated with survival were similar.     

Racial differences in treatment and survival from early-stage breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: African-American women have a significantly worse prognosis from breast carcinoma compared with white women, even when the stage at diagnosis is equivalent. The purpose of this study was to analyze racial differences in the treatment (use of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy) of women with early-stage breast carcinoma and the resulting effects on survival rates. METHODS: Subjects included 10,073 African-American and 123,127 white women diagnosed with Stage I, IIA, or IIB breast carcinoma in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program between 1988 and 1998. Comparisons were made by race with treatment, age, hormone receptor status, and stage at the time of diagnosis. Survival analyses were conducted to compare risk of death for African-American and white women while controlling for age, stage, and hormone receptor status. RESULTS: Among women diagnosed with early-stage breast carcinoma who receive breast-conserving surgery, African-American women were significantly less likely to receive follow-up radiation therapy in every 10-year age group except in the older than 85 age group. Whether treatment was equivalent or suboptimal, survival for African-American women with early-stage breast carcinoma was significantly worse. However, when treatment was equivalent, the effects of racial differences on survival were significantly less compared with survival associated with suboptimal treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Significant racial differences exist in the treatment of women with early-stage breast carcinoma. Public health efforts to eliminate suboptimal treatment would reduce, but not eliminate, racial disparity in survival.     

Racial differences in breast carcinoma survival

BACKGROUND: Survival after breast carcinoma diagnosis is significantly worse among African American women for reasons unknown. The purpose of this study was to update reports on the National Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and to examine the effect of race on breast carcinoma survival. METHODS: Subjects were 135,424 women diagnosed with primary breast carcinoma between 1988-1995. Patient age, tumor stage at the time of diagnosis, hormone receptor status, tumor histology, menopausal status, and survival were compared by race category. RESULTS: African American women diagnosed with breast carcinoma (n = 11,159) had a significantly increased risk of death from breast carcinoma and from all cancers compared with white women (n = 124,265), independent of the effects of other predictor variables. African American women were significantly younger at the time of diagnosis, with approximately 33% of the population age 相似文献   

Racial/ethnic differences in job loss for women with breast cancer

Introduction  

We examined race/ethnic differences in treatment-related job loss and the financial impact of treatment-related job loss, in a population-based sample of women diagnosed with breast cancer.     

Racial/ethnic variation in clinical presentation,treatment, and survival among breast cancer patients under age 35

BACKGROUND: The age specific breast cancer incidence rate for African-American women under age 35 is more than twice the rate for white women of similar age, and the mortality rate is more than three times higher. To determine factors that may explain racial/ethnic variation in outcomes among young women diagnosed with breast cancer, the authors examined the clinical presentation, treatment, and survival of African-American, Hispanic, and white women under age 35 years. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program data for 1990-1998 and SEER Patterns of Care data for 1990, 1991, and 1995 were used for this analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine factors associated with the receipt of selected breast cancer treatments. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to examine 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival. RESULTS: The authors found racial/ethnic variation in clinical presentation, treatment, and survival. Both African-American and Hispanic women presented with higher disease stage and a higher prevalence of adverse prognostic indicators compared to white women. African-American and Hispanic women received cancer-directed surgery and radiation less frequently after undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Racial/ethnic differences in clinical presentation and treatment were associated with poorer overall survival in unadjusted analyses. African-American and Hispanic women also had poorer overall survival after controlling for clinical and demographic characteristics and type of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Future research studies should further examine the factors that influence racial/ethnic differences in incidence, clinical presentation, and treatment differentials among young women diagnosed with breast cancer. A better understanding of these factors will facilitate the development of strategies to help eliminate this health disparity.     

Racial/ethnic differences in quality of life after diagnosis of breast cancer

Introduction  

Most studies on quality of life of breast cancer survivors have not had adequate representation of ethnic minorities. The purpose of this study was to determine whether racial/ethnic differences in quality of life exist between white, African American, and Latina women in the early stages of survivorship.     

Racial and ethnic differences in treatment and survival among adults with primary extremity soft-tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND: Limb preservation is preferred to amputation for patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS). Disparities in the treatment and outcomes of several malignancies have been reported, but not for ESTS. The authors assessed racial/ethnic differences in patient- and tumor-specific characteristics, treatment, and disease-specific survival in a population of adults with ESTS. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify 6406 adult patients with ESTS who were diagnosed and treated between 1988 and 2003. Patients were categorized into 1 of 4 racial/ethnic groups: whites, blacks, Hispanics, and Asians. Comparisons of treatment and disease-specific survival were conducted with regression models that adjusted for patient age, sex, SEER geographic region, extent of disease, tumor grade, tumor size, and histology. RESULTS: Relative to whites, blacks received lower rates of adjuvant radiation with surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.66-0.90). Hispanics received significantly lower rates of limb-sparing surgery (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.97). In a multivariate analysis controlling for patient age, sex, SEER geographic region, extent of disease, tumor grade, tumor size, and histology, blacks displayed a worse disease-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39; 95% CI, 1.13-1.70), whereas Asians demonstrated superior disease-specific survival (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: There were significant racial/ethnic differences in treatment and survival among adults with ESTS. Compared with whites, survival was poorer for blacks but better for Asians. These disparities were not explained by differences in patient or tumor characteristics.     

Racial differences in breast cancer patients

One thousand seventy-eight patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer were examined for racial differences in histopathologic and clinical parameters. There were no observed differences in tumor histopathologic type or tumor endocrine status between races. There were no differences with respect to time to breast tumor recurrence observed between black and white patients. However, differences were observed in factors that contributed to tumor stage at diagnosis and to tumor grade. Survival differences observed in univariant analysis of blacks vs. whites were explainable by the presence of more severe skin involvement, tumor grade, and tumor size at diagnosis in the black patients.     

Racial/ethnic differences in adequacy of information and support for women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Providing breast cancer patients with needed information and support is an essential component of quality care. This study investigated racial/ethnic variations in the information received and in the availability of peer support. METHODS: In total, 1766 women who were diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer and reported to the Los Angeles County Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry from June 2005 to May 2006 were mailed a survey after initial treatment. Among accrued cases, 96.2% met eligibility criteria (n = 1698), and 72% completed the survey. Race/ethnicity categories were white, African American, and Latinas (2 categories indicating low or high acculturation, which was determined by using the Short Acculturation Scale for Hispanics). Outcomes included receipt and need for treatment-related and survivorship-related information, difficulty understanding information, and support from women with breast cancer. RESULTS: More women reported receiving treatment-related information than survivorship-related information. After adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment factors, a higher percentage of low acculturated Latina women desired more information on treatment-related and survivorship-related issues (P < .001). Significantly more Latina low acculturated women than white women reported difficulty understanding written materials, with 74.5% requiring help from others. A higher percentage of all minority groups compared with whites reported no contact with other women with breast cancer (P < .05) and reported less contact through family/friends (P < .05). Women rated the benefit of talking to other women high, particularly with emotional issues. CONCLUSIONS: Continued efforts to provide culturally appropriate information and support needs to women with breast cancer are necessary to achieve quality care. Latinas with low acculturation reported more unmet information and care support needs than women in other racial/ethnic groups.     

Determinants of participation in treatment decision-making by older breast cancer patients

PURPOSE: To identify the impact of patient age and patient-physician communication on older breast cancer patients' participation in treatment decision-making. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of breast cancer patients aged 55 years or older (n = 222) in Los Angeles County. Patients received a breast cancer diagnosis between 1998 and 2000, and were interviewed on average 7.1 months (SD = 2.9) from diagnosis. All patient-physician communication variables were measured by patient self-report. Patient participation in treatment decision-making was defined by (1) questioning the surgeon about treatment, and (2) perception of self as the final decision-maker. RESULTS: In multiple logistic regression analyses, surgeons' specific solicitation of patients' input about treatment preferences had positive relationships with both dimensions of patient participation in decision-making, that is, questioning the surgeon (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-4.16) and perceiving oneself to be the final decision-maker (OR = 2.38, CI = 1.08-5.28), controlling for patients' sociodemographic and case-mix characteristics and social support. Greater emotional support from surgeons was negatively associated with patient perception of being the final decision-maker. Physicians' information-giving and patient age were not associated with the participation measures. However, greater patient-perceived self-efficacy in patient-physician interactions was related to participation. CONCLUSION: In breast cancer patients aged 55 years and older, surgeons' solicitation of patients' treatment preferences was a powerful independent predictor of patient participation in treatment decision-making, as was patient's self-efficacy in interacting with physicians. Increasing both physicians' and patients' partnership-building skills might enhance the quality of treatment decision-making and treatment outcomes in this burgeoning patient population.     

Racial differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with early stage bladder cancer

BACKGROUND:

Black patients are at greater of risk of death from bladder cancer than white patients. Potential explanations for this disparity include a more aggressive phenotype and delays in diagnosis resulting in higher stage disease. Alternatively, black patients may receive a lower quality of care, which may explain this difference.

METHODS:

Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)‐Medicare data for the years from 1992 through 2002, the authors identified patients with early stage bladder cancer. Multivariate models were fitted to measure relations between race and mortality, adjusting for differences in patients and treatment intensity. Next, shared‐frailty proportional hazards models were fitted to evaluate whether the disparity was explained by differences in the quality of care provided.

RESULTS:

Compared with white patients (n = 14,271), black patients (n = 342) were more likely to undergo restaging resection (12% vs 6.5%; P < .01) and urine cytologic evaluation (36.8% vs 29.7%; P < .01), yet they received fewer endoscopic evaluations (4 vs 5; P < .01). The use of aggressive therapies (cystectomy, systemic chemotherapy, radiation) was found to be similar among black patients and white patients (12% vs 10.2%, respectively; P = .31). Although black patients had a greater risk of death compared with white patients (hazards ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.07‐1.42), this risk was attenuated only modestly after adjusting for differences in treatment intensity and provider effects (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06‐1.42).

CONCLUSIONS:

Although differences in initial treatment were evident, they did not appear to be systematic and had unclear clinical significance. Whereas black patients are at greater risk of death, this disparity did not appear to be caused by differences in the intensity or quality of care provided. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Racial/ethnic differences and potential psychological benefits in use of the internet by women with breast cancer

Many websites on the Internet offer information to breast cancer patients and are increasingly being used. The authors investigated the potential psychological benefits of Internet use and how it varied as a function of race/ethnicity among 180 white, African American, and Hispanic American breast cancer patients who used the Internet for medical information. Using standardized psychological measures, as measured by the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL), Internet use among minorities was associated with greater overall, appraisal, and tangible social support (p's<0.05) but not belonging and self-esteem social support than among whites. No differences were observed for stress, depressive symptoms, loneliness, and coping. Since numerous studies suggest that social support may be related to survival, Internet use for breast health issues may have special clinical relevance to racial/ethnic minority groups.     

Survival differences in breast cancer among racial/ethnic groups: a population-based study

In women, breast cancer is the most frequent solid tumor and the second leading cause of cancer death. Differences in survival of breast cancer have been noted among racial/ethnic groups, but the reasons are unclear. This report presents the characteristics and the survival experience of four racial/ethnic groups and evaluates the effects of stage, age, histology, and treatment on survival time. The distributions of prognostic factors and treatment among racial/ethnic groups are compared using female breast cancer patients from two population-based registries in Southern California. The main end points are observed survival time and survival by cause of death. The Cox model is used to estimate the relative risk of death in three minority groups compared with non-Hispanic whites, while controlling for several covariates. Breast cancer cases included in this study were 10,937 non-Hispanic whites, 185 blacks, 875 Hispanics, and 412 Asians. The median follow-up period was 76 months (range: 48-132). The median age at diagnosis was 64 years among non-Hispanic whites, 55 years among Hispanics (p = 0.001), 52 years among blacks (p = 0.001), and 50 years among Asians (p = 0. 001). There was more localized disease among non-Hispanic whites (61. 4%) than among blacks (50.8%) and Hispanics (52.2%), but not compared to Asians (59.7%). After controlling for stage, age, histology, treatment, and registry, overall survival significantly differed between non-Hispanic whites and blacks [relative risk (RR) = 2.27, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.82-2.84) and between non-Hispanic whites and Hispanics (RR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.34). The same results were found for breast cancer death in blacks (RR = 2.32, 95% CI 1.76-3.07) and Hispanics (RR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.10-1.50). We found no difference between Asians and non-Hispanic whites in overall and cancer-related survival. These results show that stage of disease, age at diagnosis, histologic features and treatment for breast cancer differed among racial/ethnic groups. Moreover, black women, in particular, and Hispanic women with breast cancer had a higher risk of death compared to non-Hispanic white women, even after controlling for prognostic factors. These findings underline the necessity of improved screening and access to appropriate treatment among minority women for breast cancer.     

Racial/ethnic differences in receipt of pelvic lymph node dissection among men with localized/regional prostate cancer

BACKGROUND:

Black and Hispanic men have a lower prostate cancer (PCa) survival rate than white men. This racial/ethnic survival gap has been explained in part by differences in tumor characteristics, stage at diagnosis, and disparities in receipt of definitive treatment. Another potential contributing factor is racial/ethnic differences in the timely and accurate detection of lymph node metastases. The current study was conducted to examine the association between race/ethnicity and the receipt of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) among men with localized/regional PCa.

METHODS:

Logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted odds of undergoing PLND among men who were diagnosed during 2000 to 2002 with PCa, who underwent radical prostatectomy or PLND without radical prostatectomy, and who were diagnosed in regions covered by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (n = 40,848).

RESULTS:

Black men were less likely to undergo PLND than white men (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84‐0.98). When the analysis was stratified by PCa grade, black men with well differentiated PCa (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27‐0.84) and poorly differentiated PCa (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60‐0.89) were less likely to undergo PLND than their white counterparts, but racial differences were not observed among men with moderately differentiated PCa (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.88‐1.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Among men with poorly differentiated PCa, failure to undergo PLND was associated with worse survival. Racial disparities in the receipt of PLND, especially among men with poorly differentiated PCa, may contribute to racial differences in prostate cancer survival. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.