共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
目的探讨股静脉不同置管固定方法的效果。方法将232例股静脉置管患者随机均分为观察组和对照组各116例。观察组用3M透明敷贴联合无痛保护膜固定导管,对照组只用3M透明敷贴固定。结果两组导管留置时间及局部皮肤不良反应发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(均P〈0.01)。结论3M透明敷贴联合无痛保护膜固定股静脉置管效果好,并发症少,有利于患者完成全程治疗。 相似文献
2.
脑卒中急性期股静脉置管的护理 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
我科 1 995年 4月至 1 999年 4月 ,对 63例脑卒中急性期患者以股静脉置管行抢救治疗 ,效果满意 ,报告如下。1 临床资料本组 63例 ,男 47例 ,女 1 6例 ,年龄 41~ 87岁。高血压脑出血 37例 ,脑梗死 2 2例 ,蛛网膜下腔出血4例 ,均行股静脉置管抢救治疗。2 方法2 .1 物品准备单腔静脉导管装置 (德国贝朗公司生产 ) 1套 ,静脉切开包 (内有手术刀、持针器、止血钳、镊、缝针、线、剪刀、注射器等 ) ,无菌手套 ,2 %利多卡因 ,肝素盐水 ( 6.2 5U/ ml)、肝素帽、碘酊、酒精及输液装置。2 .2 置管方法1会阴部备皮。2取仰卧位 ,穿刺侧下肢伸直稍… 相似文献
3.
总结特殊体位患者行股静脉置管的护理经验。认为在侧卧位或半卧位状态下重视体位摆放.正确定位股静脉,掌握穿刺技巧,加强皮肤护理等,能保证置管成功。 相似文献
4.
颈内静脉置管与股静脉置管建立血液透析临时血管通路护理体会 总被引:5,自引:1,他引:5
建立和维护一个良好的血液循环系统通路 (血管通路 )是保证血液顺利进行和血液透析充分的重要条件。对于无法建立合适的动静脉瘘或经多次自体内瘘失败后无再建自体内瘘的理想部位 ,特别是因自体内瘘未成熟及急性肾衰竭、各类急性药物中毒、毒物中毒等而急需透析建立临时安全有效通路的病人 ,采用单针双腔导管插入颈内静脉或股静脉已成为血管通路的途径。现将我科 2 0 0 0年以来颈内静脉置管及股静脉置管在血液透析中对比观察结果及护理体会报告如下。资料与方法1 临床资料 共观察 2 0 0 0年 4月~ 2 0 0 3年 4月颈内静脉置管 4 5例 ,股静… 相似文献
5.
三种下肢静脉穿刺置管方法效果比较 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
目的 寻找下肢静脉最佳的穿刺置管方法.方法 将经下肢化疗的85例肿瘤患者分为三组.外周深静脉组23例,选择内踝大隐静脉起始处或小腿内侧,以15°~30°角进针行静脉穿刺,置入16 G PICC导管至大隐静脉末段或股静脉,经X线拍片证实导管尖端位置正确后接通输液装置输液;股静脉组41例,选择股动脉搏动最明显部位的内侧0.5 cm处,针头指向患者头部、与皮肤呈30°~45°角穿刺,王入16 G单腔中心静脉导管输液;外周留置针组21例,采用18~22 G贝朗留置针,选择下肢浅静脉行静脉穿刺王管输液.结果 三组一次置管成功率及操作平均耗时、化疗性静脉炎发生率总体比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05,P<0.01),股静脉组成功率最低且耗时最多,外周留置针组化疗性静脉炎发生率最高;外周深静脉组导管平均留置时间显著短于股静脉组(P<0.05),两组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但股静脉组发生严重感染1例.结论 为预防化疗性静脉炎,应避免使用外周静脉而选择深静脉给药.外周深静脉置管与股静脉穿刺王管比较,操作简单、一次操作成功率高、耗时少,无严重并发症,是下肢深静脉置管较理想的方式. 相似文献
6.
7.
经皮股静脉穿刺置管定位方法的改进 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
中心静脉插管是外科基本操作之一。经颈内静脉或经锁骨下静脉置管操作要求高 ,失败率达 7%~ 19%[1] ,偶可致严重并发症。经皮股静脉穿刺置管则方法简单 ,尤适合非熟练者。我们采用改进的经股静脉插管方法 ,使穿刺成功率大为提高 ,现报告如下。材料与方法 1.病人2 0 0 0年 1月~ 12月 ,对 15 4例需迅速建立中心静脉径路的危重病人、锁骨下静脉或颈内静脉插管难以施行或插管未成功者及因输液或静脉营养需置中心静脉插管者 ,施行股静脉穿刺置管。禁忌证 :①深静脉血栓形成者 ;②处于高凝状态者 ;③近 4周同侧曾行股静脉插管 ;④有下肢缺血… 相似文献
8.
9.
目的:探讨股静脉置管在血液净化中发生的护理问题及解决方法,便于指导临床护理工作。方法:将2003年1月~2011年10月我科收治的140例血液净化股静脉置管患者分为两组:2003年1月~2010年2月常规血液净化股静脉置管患者70例为对照组,2010年2月~2011年10月加强股静脉置管护理的血液净化股静脉置管患者70例为实验组;回顾性分析所有患者的护理资料,比较两组患者血液净化股静脉置管的护理并发症发生率。结果:对照组股静脉置管护理并发症发生率43%;实验组股静脉置管护理并发症发生率20%,实验组较对照组并发症明显减少,痛苦明显减轻。结论:置管后的精心护理可明显减少护理并发症、患者痛苦及导管留置时间,增加导管使用期限。 相似文献
10.
白血病患者行股静脉置管化疗的护理 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
化疗是白血病治疗的主要手段,大剂量、多疗程的反复使用化疗药物,常使外周血管受到刺激,引起血管阻塞、血管失去弹性及静脉炎、周围皮肤色素沉着。1996年10月至1998年3月,我科对50例化疗的白血病患者采用股静脉置管输入化疗药物,取得较好效果,护理体会... 相似文献
11.
12.
施乐扣固定PICC的效果观察 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
目的探讨新型导管固定装置施乐扣固定PICC的临床效果。方法将行PICC的患者120例随机分为实验组和对照组各60例,实验组采用施乐扣固定导管,对照组常规采用纸胶带固定。结果实验组静脉炎、皮肤破溃及计划外拔管发生率显著低于对照组(P0.05,P0.01)。结论施乐扣固定PICC,可减少计划外重新置管和导管相关并发症,保障患者安全,同时减少医护人员工作量。 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
Jae Myeong Lee Young Kwon Cho Han Myun Kim Myung Gyu Song Soon-Young Song Jae Woo Yeon Dae Young Yoon Sam Yeol Lee 《Journal of vascular surgery》2018,67(3):860-867
Objective
The objective of this study was to conduct a prospective clinical trial evaluating the technical feasibility and short-term clinical outcome of the blind pushing technique for placement of pretrimmed peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) through brachial vein access.Methods
Patients requiring PICC placement at any of the three participating institutions were prospectively enrolled between January and December 2016. The review boards of all participating institutions approved this study, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. PICC placement was performed using the blind pushing technique and primary brachial vein access. The following data were collected from unified case report forms: access vein, obstacles during PICC advancement, procedure time, and postprocedural complications.Results
During the 12-month study period, 1380 PICCs were placed in 1043 patients. Of these, 1092 PICCs placed in 837 patients were enrolled, with 834 PICCs (76%) and 258 PICCs (34%) placed through brachial vein and nonbrachial vein access, respectively. In both arms, obstacles were most commonly noted in the subclavian veins (n = 220) and axillary veins (n = 94). Successful puncture of the access vein was achieved at first try in 1028 PICCs (94%). The technical success rate was 99%, with 1055 PICCs (97%) placed within 120 seconds of procedure time and 1088 PICCs (99%) having the tip located at the ideal position. Follow-up Doppler ultrasound detected catheter-associated upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT) for 18 PICCs in 16 patients and late symptomatic UEDVT for 16 PICCs in 16 patients (3.1%). Catheter-associated UEDVT was noted for 28 PICCs (82%) and 6 PICCs (18%) placed through brachial vein and nonbrachial vein access, respectively. The incidence of obstacles and the procedure time (<120 seconds) differed significantly between brachial vein and nonbrachial vein access (P = .001). There was no statistically significant difference between brachial vein and nonbrachial vein access in the incidence of UEDVT (odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-3.52; P = .22).Conclusions
The placement of pretrimmed PICCs by the blind pushing technique and primary brachial vein access is technically feasible and may represent an alternative to the conventional PICC placement technique, having low incidences of UEDVT and other complications, with no significant difference in outcomes between brachial vein and nonbrachial vein access. 相似文献16.
Waclaw Weyde Roman Badowski Magdalena Krajewska Jozef Penar Krzysztof Moron Marian Klinger 《Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation》2004,19(6):1618-1621
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Catheterization of the femoral vein is a safe and recommended method of temporary access for haemodialysis. In some patients, however, because of the lack of other possibilities, it is necessary to maintain long-term femoral cannulation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of stenosis after prolonged femoral cannulation. METHODS: The 24 patients incorporated in the study were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 10 end-stage kidney failure patients (four females and six males, aged 32-75 years, average 55.6+/-13.6 years) in whom femoral catheters were maintained for less than 2 weeks (5-14 days, average 9.3+/-3.6 days). Group 2 included 14 chronic haemodialysis patients (six females and eight males aged 23-65 years, average 49.5+/-13.27 years). The time of catheter maintenance ranged from 2 to 16 weeks (average 6.4+/-4.2 weeks). Femoral and iliac vein status was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: A feature of venous stenosis of both the femoral and iliac veins was disclosed in four patients in whom femoral cannulation lasted more than 4 weeks. There were no stenoses in group 1. CONCLUSION: Long-term femoral cannulation for more than 4 weeks may be associated with a significant risk of stenosis in the femoral and/or external iliac veins. 相似文献
17.
18.
Iliac vein stenosis secondary to femoral catheter placement. 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
19.
目的:探讨经外周置入中心静脉导管固定方法改良后的固定效果.方法:选取51例应用经外周置入中心静脉导管的患者作为观察组,导管采用改良的“C”型固定方法,同时选50例采用传统“S”型固定方法固定经外周置入中心静脉导管的患者作为对照组,比较两种固定方法的固定效果.结果:观察组与对照组患者在堵管、脱管、导管断裂、移位、置管处感染、导管压迫皮肤等方面比较差异显著(P<0.05).结论:经外周置入中心静脉导管采用“C”型改良固定方法固定效果良好,可避免导管断裂、移位、脱管、堵管现象,减少了置管处感染,值得临床推广. 相似文献