Intramuscular ketorolac following total hip replacement with spinal anaesthesia and intrathecal morphine

We have studied the analgesic and morphine sparing effect of ketorolac tromethamine in 60 patients after total hip replacement under spinal anaesthesia.
In this double blind study 30 patients received ketorolac 30 mg IM 6 hourly postoperatively and the control group received saline. Analgesia was assessed by visual analogue pain scores (VAS) and morphine consumption by patient controlled analgesia (PCA). There was a significantly ( P <0.02) lower morphine consumption in the ketorolac group (7.1 ±8.6 mg; Mean±s.d.) when compared to the saline group (14.2±13.6 mg). Although there was a trend for lower VAS on the first postoperative night this was only significant at 10 hours postoperatively and the next morning at 08:00 hr. The incidence of side effects (emetic sequelae, pruritus and headache) were similar in both groups. It is concluded that ketorolac reduces the consumption of additional morphine in conjunction with intrathecal morphine but had no effects on the side effects.     

A comparison of ketorolac tromethamine/oxycodone versus patient-controlled analgesia with morphine in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients

Effective postoperative analgesia with minimal side effects remains an important goal in enabling increasingly complex surgical procedures to be performed on an outpatient basis. In this study, we examined the efficacy of postoperative analgesia in 90 patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a patellar tendon autograft, with a 24-hour hospital stay. Patients were randomized to receive either intramuscular ketorolac supplemented by oral oxycodone, or intravenous morphine via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device, for postoperative analgesia. Patients were monitored for 2 hours in the recovery room, then every 4 hours until discharge, for the presence of complications of nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, pruritus, and dizziness. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) on the morning of postoperative day one. All patients were discharged by 24 hours after surgery. Ten (20%) of the patients receiving ketorolac/oxycodone versus 31 (79%) of those receiving PCA morphine experienced postoperative complications (P < .05). Postoperative nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention were each significantly more common in the PCA morphine group (P < .05). The incidence of pruritus and dizziness was low overall. There was no significant difference between groups in the severity of postoperative pain as assessed using a VAS. We conclude that ketorolac/oxycodone may provide comparable analgesia with fewer undesirable side effects than PCA morphine in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patients receiving ketorolac/oxymorphone may have a better quality recovery and more rapid discharge. (Arthroscopy 1998 Nov-Dec;14(8):816-9.)     

Peroperative titration of morphine improves immediate postoperative analgesia after total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE: To determine the Influence of peroperative titrated morphine on postoperative pain control. METHODS: Forty patients received general anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and were divided into two groups of 20. In the Peroperative group (Perop group;) morphine was titrated at the end of surgery (3 mg i.v. every 5 or 10 min) in spontaneously breathing intubated patients, until the respiratory rate (RR) decreased. No morphine was administered to Postop group. In the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) patients in Perop and Postop groups received morphine until adequate pain relief VAS < or = 30 mm. Patients used patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for the next 24 hr. In the PACU, the delay for analgesia, doses of morphine used and incidence of side effects were recorded. RESULTS: In the Perop group, patients received 10.3 +/- 1.3 mg (2-20 mg) as peroperative titration and had achieved adequate analgesia more rapidly than in the Postop group (42 +/- 7 min vs 76 +/- 7 min); P = 0.0026). Analgesia in the PACU in the Postop group required larger doses of morphine (15.4 +/- 1.5 mg;) than in the Perop group (7.3 +/- 1.3 mg; P = 0.0004). The respiratory rate decrease during peroperative morphine titration was correlated to the morphine dose needed in the PACU (P = 0.035). Respiratory depression in the PACU was more common in the Postop group than in the Perop group (five patients vs no patient P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the peroperative administration of morphine can facilitate immediate postoperative pain management.     

Intravenous parecoxib sodium foracute pain after orthopedic knee surgery

Our objective in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and active-controlled study was to evaluate and compare the analgesic effectiveness of single intravenous (IV) doses of parecoxib sodium 20 and 40 mg, morphine 4 mg, and ketorolac 30 mg in the postsurgical orthopedic pain model. After undergoing unilateral total knee replacement surgery, 208 healthy adult patients were randomized to receive placebo or a study drug within 6 hours of discontinuation of patient-controlled analgesia on postoperative day 1. Onset of analgesia was similarly rapid with IV parecoxib sodium 40 mg, morphine, and ketorolac. Level and duration of analgesia were significantly superior with parecoxib sodium than with morphine and were similar for parecoxib sodium and ketorolac. Parecoxib sodium was safe and well tolerated. In conclusion, IV parecoxib sodium 40 mg is as effective as ketorolac 30 mg and is more effective than morphine 4 mg and therefore has potential widespread utility in acute postoperative pain management.     

Effect of preemptive multimodal analgesia for arthroscopic knee ligament repair

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Administration of analgesic medication before surgery, rather than at the completion of the procedure, may reduce postoperative pain. Similarly, administration of multiple analgesics, with different mechanisms of action, may provide improved postoperative pain control and functional recovery. The purpose of our study was to compare pain scores and intravenous opioid consumption after outpatient anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients who received a multimodal drug combination (intravenous [IV] ketorolac, intra-articular morphine/ropivacaine/epinephrine, and femoral nerve block with ropivacaine) either before surgery or immediately at the completion of the surgical procedure. METHODS: Forty patients presenting for same-day arthroscopic ACL repair using a semitendinosis tendon graft were included in this study. The patients were randomized to receive the following drugs either 15 minutes before skin incision or immediately after skin closure: (1) Ketorolac 30 mg IV. (2) Intra-articular injection of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.25% + morphine 2 mg and epinephrine 1:200,000. (3) Femoral nerve block with 20 mL ropivacaine 0.25%. Verbal pain scores were obtained in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7. IV patient controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine consumption in the PACU was also recorded. RESULTS: Verbal pain rating scores were lower in group I (preemptive) for 2.0 hours after arrival in the PACU. There was no difference between groups in pain scores on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7. Mean IV PCA morphine consumption in the PACU was lower in group I (6.4 mg) versus group II (12.3 mg), P <.05. CONCLUSION: Preemptive, multimodal administration of our 3-component analgesic drug combination resulted in lower pain scores during the initial stay in the PACU unit and lower consumption of IV PCA morphine in the PACU. However, pain scores were similar in both groups on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7; thus, there was no measurable long-term advantage associated with preemptive multimodal drug administration.     

Postoperative analgesia after total hip arthroplasty: patient-controlled analgesia versus transdermal fentanyl patch

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a new transdermal fentanyl patch (TFP) is a good choice for the postoperative pain management of patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty compared with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). DESIGN: Randomized, prospective study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 30 patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either a TFP (group T; Duragesic 50 microg/h, matrix fentanyl patch, Janssen-Cilag) applied approximately 10 hours before induction of general anesthesia and PCA programmed in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), or PCA programmed in the PACU (group P). MEASUREMENTS: Intraoperative sufentanil and additional postoperative morphine administration were recorded, as well as visual analog scores and routine vital signs at predetermined intervals during the first 48 hours. MAIN RESULTS: Morphine consumption on arrival in the PACU was 3.5+/-3 mg in group T versus 13+/-5 mg in group P (P<0.0001). Visual analog scores on arrival in the PACU were 37+/-22 mm in group T versus 73+/-13 mm in group P (P<0.0001). Cumulative morphine consumption at the 24th hour was 43+/-16 mg in group P and 4+/-3 mg in group T (P<0.0001). Cumulative morphine consumption at the 48th hour was 54+/-26 mg in group P and 5+/-4 mg in group T (P<0.0001). Intraoperative sufentanil consumption was 38+/-15 microg in group T versus 30+/-5 microg in group P (not significant). The sedation score was 0 in both groups during the first 48 postoperative hours. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative TFP application decreases pain scores and morphine consumption in the PACU and appears to have prolonged effects spanning the first 48 postoperative hours.     

Local infiltration analgesia is not improved by postoperative intra-articular bolus injections for pain after total hip arthroplasty

Background and purpose — The effect of postoperative intra-articular bolus injections after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. We tested the hypothesis that intra-articular bolus injections administered every 6 hours after surgery during the first 24 hours would significantly improve analgesia after THA.

Patients and methods — 80 patients undergoing THA received high-volume local infiltration analgesia (LIA; 200 mg ropivacaine and 30 mg ketorolac) followed by 4 intra-articular injections with either ropivacaine (100 mg) and ketorolac (15 mg) (the treatment group) or saline (the control group). The intra-articular injections were combined with 4 intravenous injections of either saline (treatment group) or 15 mg ketorolac (control group). All patients received morphine as patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The primary outcome was consumption of intravenous morphine PCA and secondary outcomes were consumption of oral morphine, pain intensity, side effects, readiness for hospital discharge, length of hospital stay, and postoperative consumption of analgesics at 3, 6, and 12 weeks after surgery.

Results — There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups regarding postoperative consumption of intravenous morphine PCA. Postoperative pain scores during walking were higher in the treatment group from 24–72 hours after surgery, but other pain scores were similar between groups. Time to readiness for hospital discharge was longer in the treatment group. Other secondary outcomes were similar between groups.

Interpretation — Postoperative intra-articular bolus injections of ropivacaine and ketorolac cannot be recommended as analgesic method after THA.     

Postoperative pain control with methadone following lower abdominal surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To describe a technique for the use of methadone during and following lower abdominal surgery that integrates its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties with the objective of postoperative analgesia; to compare methadone with morphine for postoperative pain control. DESIGN: Randomized prospective clinical trial. Patients were not told which agent they received (single-blind). SETTING: Department of anesthesia and gynecology surgical service at a university medical center. PATIENTS: Forty women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy (n = 39) or myomectomy (n = 1). INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either methadone (Group 1) or morphine (Group 2) 20 mg intravenously (IV) following induction of anesthesia, additional IV opioid in the recovery room, and subsequent opioid as needed (PRN) intramuscularly (IM) on the postsurgical wards. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Respiratory rate, sedation, and hemodynamics were assessed frequently (at least every 4 hours). Patients were studied for 72 hours following recovery room discharge. Patients required less methadone than morphine in the recovery room (2.0 +/- 2.9 mg vs 4.4 +/- 2.9 mg). Patients requested less methadone than morphine for pain relief on the wards (4.5 +/- 4.2 mg vs 42.3 +/- 14.3 mg). Patients in the methadone group reported lower pain intensity by VAS (1.9 +/- 0.3 vs 3.4 +/- 0.6). These differences are statistically significant (p less than 0.01). CONCLUSION: Sustained analgesia with methadone is predicted by its pharmacokinetics. Patients who received 22 +/- 2.9 mg of IV methadone (combined intraoperative and recovery room doses) reported less pain and required minimal additional analgesic over the next 72 hours than did patients who received morphine. This is consistent with sustained therapeutic plasma levels due to methadone's long plasma half-life (54 +/- 20 hours). Use of methadone in this manner is an effective therapy for postoperative pain control and is not associated with toxicity or notable side effects.     

Intraoperative loading attenuates nausea and vomiting of tramadol patient-controlled analgesia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the adverse effect profile of tramadol by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with administration of the loading dose either intraoperatively or postoperatively. METHODS: Sixty adult patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery were enrolled into this prospective, randomized, double blind study. The patients were anesthetized in a similar manner. At the beginning of wound closure, the patients were randomly allocated to receive 5 mg x kg(-1) tramadol (Group 1) or normal saline (Group 2). In the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), when patients in either group complained of pain, 30 mg x ml(-1) tramadol i.v. were given every three minutes until visual analogue scale (VAS) 3, followed by tramadol PCA with bolus dose of 30 mg and five minute lockout interval. Pain control and adverse effect assessments were done in the PACU and every six hours for 48 hr post drug by an independent observer. RESULTS: The loading dose was 290 +/- 45 mg in Group 1 and 315 +/- 148 mg in Group 2. In PACU, more nausea/vomiting both in terms of incidence (13/30, 43% vs 2/30, 6.6%, P < 0.05) and severity (nausea/vomiting score 2.5 +/- 2.0 vs 0.2 +/- 0.6, P < 0.05) was observed in patients with postoperative loading than in those with intraoperative loading of tramadol. CONCLUSION: Administering the loading dose of tramadol during surgery decreases the nausea/vomiting associated with high dose of tramadol and improves the quality of tramadol PCA in the relief of postoperative pain.     

Comparison of ketorolac and morphine as adjuvants during pediatric surgery.

The intraoperative use of opioid analgesics decreases the volatile anesthetic requirement and provides for pain relief in the early postoperative period. In a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 95 ASA physical status 1 or 2 children (ages 5-15 yr) undergoing general anesthesia for elective operations, we compared postoperative analgesia following the intraoperative intravenous (iv) administration of ketorolac, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug or morphine, an opioid analgesic. After induction of general anesthesia and before the start of the surgical procedure, children received equal volumes of saline, morphine (0.1 mg.kg-1, iv) or ketorolac (0.9 mg.kg-1, iv). Postoperative pain was evaluated by the child using a 10-cm linear visual analog scale (VAS) and by a blinded observer using both a VAS and an objective pain scale (OPS) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). There were no statistically significant differences in the VAS and OPS scores in the PACU or in the postoperative analgesic requirements in children receiving morphine or ketorolac. The placebo group had a significantly higher VAS and OPS score and required earlier and more frequent analgesic therapy in the PACU compared to the two analgesic groups. Patients receiving ketorolac had less postoperative emesis than those receiving morphine. We conclude that ketorolac (0.9 mg.kg-1) is an effective alternative to morphine (0.1 mg.kg-1) as an iv adjuvant during general anesthesia, and in the dose used in this study, is associated with less postoperative nausea and vomiting in children.     

Can immediate opioid requirements in the post-anaesthesia care unit be used to determine analgesic requirements on the ward?

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of two dosage regimens of (im) morphine calculated from an initial (iv) titrated dose in the early postoperative period. Seventy ASA I–III patients who underwent general anaesthesia (GA) (n = 58), regional anaesthesia (RA) (n = 10) or GA + RA (n = 2) for orthopaedic (n = 54), urological (n = 11) or abdominal surgery (n = 5) received iv titrated morphine in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Titration consisted of 3 mg morphine iv every ten minutes until patients had a visual analogue pain scale (VAS) <3, without marked sedation. Seventeen patients did not complain at all or had good analgesia with an initial iv dose ≤6 mg of morphine followed by paracetamol only. Patients who needed more than 6 mg iv morphine were randomly assigned to a “high-dose” or a “low-dose” group and received a systematic im morphine regimen calculated from the initial titrated dose. Pain was assessed by VAS before each im injection and the next morning. One patient had respiratory depression and one marked sedation in the PACU. These patients were excluded from the rest of the study. Only 16 patients had a VAS >3 at least once during the study period and only three needed rescue analgesia which was available on request. We conclude that a systematic im morphine regimen adapted from an initial iv titration in the PACU provides efficacious and relatively inexpensive postoperative analgesia, applicable to a great majority of patients.     

Tramadol 2.5 mg·kg−1 appears to be the optimal intraoperative loading dose before patient-controlled analgesia

PURPOSE: We previously established that a 5 mg x kg(-1) intraoperative dose can reduce the nausea/vomiting associated with tramadol patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). This study was conducted to identify the most appropriate initial dose to improve the quality of tramadol PCA. METHODS: During general anesthesia, 60 patients undergoing knee arthroplasty were randomly allocated to receive 1.25 mg x kg(-1) (Group I), 2.5 mg x kg(-1) (Group II), 3.75 mg x kg(-1) (Group III), or 5 mg x kg(-1) (Group IV) tramadol. The emergence condition was recorded. The titration of additional tramadol 20 mg + metoclopramide 1 mg doses by PCA every five minutes was performed in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) until the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was < or = 3. An investigator blinded to study group recorded the VAS and side effects every ten minutes. RESULTS: In the PACU, significantly more tramadol (8.4 +/- 3.1 vs 4.3 +/- 2.1, 2.5 +/- 1.8, and 0.4 +/- 0.3, P < 0.05), and a higher incidence (15/15 vs 5/15, 3/15, and 2/15, P < 0.05) of PCA use was observed in Group I compared to Groups II-IV. VAS was significantly higher in Group I than in Groups II-IV at zero and ten minutes (P < 0.05). Unexpected delayed emergence anesthesia (> 30 min) was observed in Group III (n = 1) and in Group IV (n = 2). Sedation was more important in Groups III and IV than in Groups I and II (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: When considering efficacy and side-effect profile, 2.5 mg x kg(-1) of tramadol is the optimal intraoperative dose of this drug to provide effective postoperative analgesia with minimal sedation.     

Ketorolac does not decrease postoperative pain in elderly men after transvesical prostatectomy

Purpose

To assess the postoperative analgesic efficacy and morphine-sparing effect of ketorolac in elderly patients.

Methods

Sixty ASA-physical status I to III men, aged 60–88 yr, undergoing transvesical prostatectomy were studied according to a randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind study protocol. A standard general anaesthetic was administered. Thirty minutes before concluding the surgical procedure either ketorolac 60 mg or an equal volume of saline was administered, im. Postoperative pain was assessed hourly for six hours using a 100 mm visual analog score (VAS) and a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device.

Results

Hourly PCA-demands, actual morphine delivered, and patient generated VAS pain scores were unaffected by the treatment modality. On conclusion of the study the total PCA morphine delivered was 11.9 mg ± 1.38 and 10.8 mg ± 1.52 for the saline and ketorolac groups, respectively.

Conclusion

The intraoperative administration of ketorolac, 60 mg, im, was not associated with postoperative morphinesparing or improved analgesia in this elderly population.     

Postoperative analgesia in cardiac surgery: spinal versus intravenous morphine

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of spinal and intravenous administration of morphine to supplement anesthesia with remifentanil in terms of analgesia during early postoperative recovery and considering time until extubation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized, blinded trial enrolled 59 patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. The patients were assigned to receive either a spinal infusion of morphine (15 microg x Kg(-1)) or an intravenous infusion (0.3 mg x Kg(-1)). Anesthesia was maintained with 0.15 to 0.50 microg x Kg(-1) x min(-1) of remifentanil and 2 to 4 mg x Kg(-1) x h(-1) of propofol in perfusion. After the period of extracorporeal circulation, all patients were given an intravenous infusion of 30 mg of ketorolac. Later intravenous ketorolac was ministered at a dose of 30 mg per 8 hours; intravenous morphine (bolus dose of 3 mg) was also administered until pain was relieved. RESULTS: The same quality of postoperative analgesia and anesthetic recovery was achieved with both spinal and intravenous administration. The incidence of side effects was also similar. Likewise, the extubation times were similar in the 2 groups (spinal infusion group: 294.5 [SD, 150.5] minutes; intravenous group: 325.0 [139.9] minutes; P>0.05). Less postoperative intravenous morphine was administered in the first 24 hours to patients in the spinal morphine group (P<0.05) and fewer patients in that group required intravenous morphine boluses (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that spinal morphine does not offer advantages over intravenous morphine with regard to postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic stability and respiratory parameters, time until extubation, or adverse effects.     

Postoperative analgesia after total-hip arthroplasty: Comparison of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine and single injection of femoral nerve or psoas compartment block. a prospective, randomized, double-blind study

BACKGROUND: The authors compared the analgesic effects and quality of rehabilitation of three analgesic techniques after total-hip arthroplasty in a double-blind, randomized trial. METHODS: Forty-five patients were assigned to 1 of 3 groups, patient-controlled analgesia with morphine (PCA), femoral nerve block (FNB), or psoas compartment block (PCB). At the end of the procedure performed under general anesthesia, nerve blocks using 2 mg/kg of 0.375% bupivacaine and 2 microg/kg of clonidine were performed in the FNB (n = 16) and PCB (n = 15) groups. In the recovery room, all 3 groups received initial intravenous morphine titration if their pain score was higher than 30 on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), and then a PCA device was initiated. Morphine consumption was the primary end point to assess postoperative analgesia. RESULTS: After extubation (H0), morphine titration was higher in the PCA group (P <.05). During the first 4 postoperative hours (H0 to H4), morphine consumption per hour and VAS pain score were lower in the PCB group (P <.05). After H4, there was no difference in morphine consumption and VAS among groups, either at rest or during mobilization. After H4, morphine consumption remained lower than 0.5 mg/h, and VAS remained lower than 30 mm in the 3 groups. In 4 patients of the PCB group, an epidural diffusion was noted. Hip mobility and length of stay in the rehabilitation center were not different among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: PCA is an efficient and safe analgesia technique. FNB and PCB should not be used routinely after total-hip arthroplasty.     

Comparison of the morphine-sparing effects of diclofenac sodium and ketorolac tromethamine after major orthopedic surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of diclofenac sodium with ketorolac tromethamine in reducing postoperative morphine use after major orthopedic surgery. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Major teaching institution. PATIENTS: 102 ASA physical status II patients undergoing hip and knee replacement with general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Before induction of anesthesia, patients were randomly allocated to receive intravenously either diclofenac sodium 75 mg (Group D), ketorolac tromethamine 60 mg (Group K), or placebo (Group P). Patient-controlled analgesia was supplied postoperatively using morphine. MEASUREMENTS: Visual analog scale (VAS), verbal pain score (VPS), sedation score, frequency of opioid side effects, and morphine consumption were recorded every 4 hours. MAIN RESULTS: There was a highly significant downward trend for VAS, VPS, and sedation scores over time, p = 0.001. The mean VAS and VPS scores were significantly lower in Groups D and K compared with Group P at time 0, p = 0.009 and 8 hours, p = 0.026. The mean (SD) 24-hour morphine requirements were 36.3 mg (16.9), 47.2 mg (34.9), and 51.6 mg (22.2) for Groups D, K, and P, respectively, p = 0.032. Fewer patients suffered from postoperative nausea and vomiting in the treatment groups (Groups D and K) compared with Group P (9, 8, and 19, respectively), p < 0.05. Fewer patients also suffered from pruritus in Groups D and K compared with Group P (3, 4, and 11, respectively), p < 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative administration of intravenous diclofenac 75 mg or ketorolac 60 mg significantly reduces morphine requirements and associated side effects after major orthopedic surgery.     

Multimodal analgesia reduces narcotic requirements and antiemetic rescue medication in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery

BackgroundAfter bariatric surgery, patients are at risk for narcotic-related side effects [1]. Multimodal pain management strategies should be used when possible to reduce the consumption of narcotic medication [2]. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether multimodal analgesia reduces narcotic consumption and may have an influence on opioid-related side effects in patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (LRYGB).MethodsIn this retrospective data analysis, we examined the data of a total of 181 consecutive patients undergoing LRYGB. In January 2011, IV acetaminophen became clinically available. Hydromorphone patient controlled analgesia (PCA) was replaced by IV acetaminophen and IV ketorolac (TNT—Tylenol and Toradol). The first 89 patients received postoperative hydromorphone PCA (PCA group). The next 92 patients received IV acetaminophen and IV ketorolac every 6 hours for the first 24 hours (TNT group). In the TNT group, 8 patients were excluded in the analysis.ResultsThere were no differences in clinical characteristics between the groups except for smoking history. Patients treated with PCA required 4.2 mg hydromorphone in the postoperative period. Patients in the TNT group required 1.1 mg hydromorphone. This was a statistically significant reduction of opioids by 73.8%. After discharge from postanesthesia care unit, 34.8% of patients required antiemetic rescue medication (AERM) compared with 20.2% in the TNT group (P<.001). The relative risk (AERM/no AERM) in the postoperative period after postanesthesia care unit discharge is 1.75 (95% CI, 1.05–2.92).ConclusionThis study suggests that a multimodal analgesic regimen (TNT) can reduce postoperative narcotic consumption, which may lead to a reduction in the number of patients requiring AERM.     

Postoperative pain following knee arthroscopy: the effects of intra-articular ketorolac and/or morphine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Morphine and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) have been found to be effective in relieving postoperative pain. The goal of this study was to determine whether ketorolac alone or in combination with morphine provides superior pain relief following arthroscopy performed with local anesthesia (LA). METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, prospective, study in 100 healthy patients from 15 to 60 years of age. Knee arthroscopy was performed with LA using 40 mL prilocaine (5 mg/mL) with adrenaline (4 microg/mL). At the end of the operation, a catheter was inserted intra-articularly, and one of the following solutions diluted to a total volume of 40 mL was injected: group P (40 mL normal saline), group M (3 mg morphine), group K30 (30 mg ketorolac), group K60 (60 mg ketorolac), and group KM (3 mg morphine + 30 mg ketorolac). Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (0-100 mm) were measured preoperative and at 30, 60, 90, 120 minutes postoperative and thereafter 4, 8, 24, and 48 hours at rest and on movement of the knee. The total number of distalgesic tablets (325 mg paracetamol + 32.5 mg dextropropoxyphene) consumed during the 48 hours postoperative was recorded. RESULTS: Significant differences in VAS pain scores were seen between group P and group KM at 4, 8, and 24 hours (P < .05) and between group M and group KM at 4, 8, 24, and 48 hours (P < .01) after the operation at rest. During mobilization of the knee, a significant difference in VAS pain score was found between group P and group KM at 8, 24, and 48 hours (P < .05) and between group P and group K60 at 24 and 48 hours (P < .05). The total consumption of distalgesic tablets did not differ among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of 3 mg morphine plus 30 mg ketorolac provided significantly better analgesia than either placebo alone or morphine alone. This result could be a synergistic effect.     

Is preoperative ketorolac a useful adjunct to regional anesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphy?

Background: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have become a popular component of analgesia regimens, particularly in combination with narcotics. We questioned whether there might also be a place for their use in conjunction with regional anesthesia and whether there was a preferable route for NSAID administration. Methods: Ilioinguinal and field blocks were performed pre-operatively on seventy patients undergoing outpatient inguinal hernia repair. Patients were divided into a control group who received no ketorolac and four study groups who received a preoperative dose of 30 mg ketorolac by one of the following routes: IV, IM, PO, or intrawound (IW). The ketorolac in the IW group was mixed in the syringe with the local anesthetic used for the field block. IV and IM groups also received ketorolac at the time of the preoperative regional anesthesia and the PO group received the dose at least one hour preoperatively. All patients received a similar general anesthetic intraoperatively. Results: Postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements were lowest for the IM, IV, and IW groups. Pain scores and analgesic requirements for the PO group were less than for the control group but more than for the other three groups. Analgesic efficacy therefore ranked: IM = IV = IW>PO>Control. Though no differences were found between groups in the time to discharge from the recovery room, the ease of nursing care paralleled the findings for pain scores and analgesia requirements. Conclusion: Beyond the analgesia provided by the regional anesthesia of the ilioinguinal and field blocks, the preoperative use of ketorolac further reduced postoperative pain scores and the need for additional postoperative analgesic medication. Comparable outcomes for the IV, IM, and IW groups indicate the lack of any benefit to concentrating the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug at the wound (IW) or to achieving high blood levels rapidly (IV). In conclusion, ketorolac is a useful supplement to ilioinguinal plus field block regional anesthesia for hernia surgery and is most effective administered parenterally.     

Non-opioid analgesia improves pain relief and decreases sedation after gastric bypass surgery

PURPOSE: Several non-opioid drugs have been shown to provide analgesia during and after surgery. We compared sevoflurane anesthesia with fentanyl analgesia to sevoflurane and non-opioid drug treatment for gastric bypass surgery and recovery. METHODS: Thirty obese patients (body mass index > 50 kg.m(-2)) undergoing gastric bypass were randomized to receive sevoflurane anesthesia with either fentanyl or a non-opioid regimen including ketorolac, clonidine, lidocaine, ketamine, magnesium sulfate, and methylprednisolone. Morphine use by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump and pain score measured by visual analogue scale were determined in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and for the first 16 hr after surgery. Sedation was evaluated in the PACU. Investigators assessing patient outcomes were blinded to the study group. RESULTS: Fentanyl treated patients were more sedated in the PACU compared to the non-opioid group. Non-opioid treated patients required 5.2 +/- 2.6 mg.hr(-1) morphine by PCA during their stay in the PACU while patients anesthetized with fentanyl used 7.8 +/- 3.3 mg.hr(-1) (P < 0.05). Fentanyl and non-opioid treated patients showed no difference in pain score one or 16 hr after surgery. CONCLUSION: Our results show that non-opioid analgesia produced pain relief and less sedation during recovery from gastric bypass surgery compared to fentanyl.