Intrathecal morphine for analgesia after postpartum bilateral tubal ligation

Postpartum bilateral tubal ligation (PPBTL) causes postoperative pain. We designed this study to determine the efficacy of 50 microg intrathecal morphine for analgesia after PPBTL. Sixty-five women received spinal anesthesia with 12.75 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine, 20 microg of fentanyl, and either 50 microg of morphine (morphine group) or 0.05 mL of saline (control group). Postoperative analgesia was provided with regular naproxen 500 mg and oxycodone 5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg mixture as needed. Overall, satisfaction was higher (P=0.003) and pain was less intense at rest (P=0.008) and on movement (P <0.0001) in the morphine group. There was no significant overall difference in nausea, pruritus, or sedation scores, but vomiting occurred more frequently in the morphine group (21.4% versus 3.5%; P=0.052). In post hoc comparisons, pain at rest within the morphine group was significantly less at 4 h (P=0.006), pain on movement was significantly less at 4 h (P=0.002) and 12 h (P=0.0004), and pruritus was significantly more frequent at 12 h (P=0.002) compared with the control group. Oxycodone 5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg mixture consumption was significantly smaller (P=0.006) and the time to first request of analgesia was significantly longer (P=0.006) in the morphine group. We conclude that the addition of 50 microg of morphine to intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl provides improved postoperative analgesia in women undergoing PPBTL.     

Postoperative epidural morphine for postpartum tubal ligation analgesia

Women undergoing postoperative postpartum tubal ligation (PPTL) often experience considerable pain. We hypothesized that epidural morphine, as part of a multi-modal analgesic regimen, would decrease postoperative pain and the need for systemic analgesia after PPTL. In a double-blinded study, patients were randomized to receive epidural saline or morphine 2 mg, 3 mg, or 4 mg after epidural anesthesia for PPTL. Postoperatively, ibuprofen 600 mg was administered every 6 h and patients could request acetaminophen 325 mg/hydrocodone 10 mg. The primary outcome variable was time to first request for supplemental analgesia. Verbal rating scores for pain and the incidence and severity of side effects were recorded for 24 h. Morphine group subjects requested supplemental analgesia later and received fewer doses compared with the saline group subjects. Peak cramping and incisional verbal rating scores for pain and the area under the verbal rating scores for pain x time curve for cramping pain were less after epidural morphine compared with saline, but there were no differences among morphine groups. Nausea, vomiting, and pruritus occurred more often in all morphine groups and subjects who received morphine 4 mg required treatment for these side effects more frequently than the saline or morphine 2 mg groups. In conclusion, epidural morphine 2 mg as part of a multi-modal analgesic regimen improved analgesia and decreased the need for supplemental analgesics after PPTL. The need to treat side effects with morphine 2 mg was not increased compared to a regimen of oral acetaminophen/opioid/nonsteroidal antiinflammatory analgesics.     

蛛网膜下隙注射吗啡术后镇痛

目的　探讨蛛网膜下隙注射吗啡术后镇痛的临床效果及不良反应。方法　ASAⅠ～Ⅱ级 6 0例择期妇科手术病人 ,随机分为两组 ,每组 30例 ,均采用腰麻 硬膜外联合阻滞。腰麻用药为0 5 %重比重布比卡因 10mg ,然后硬膜外腔置管。研究组于腰麻药中加入吗啡 0 2 5mg ,对照组则于硬膜外腔注射吗啡 2mg。术后行视觉模拟评分 (VAS)、Ramsay镇静评分、BCS(Bruggrmanncomfortscale)舒适评分并观察不良反应发生情况。结果　蛛网膜下隙吗啡组术后完全无痛时间和持续镇痛时间明显长于硬膜外吗啡组 ,VAS评分明显低于硬膜外吗啡组 (P <0 0 5或P <0 0 1)。Ramsay评分和BCS评分明显高于硬膜外吗啡组 (P <0 0 5或P <0 0 1)。蛛网膜下隙吗啡组术后不良反应发生率明显增加 (P <0 0 5 )。结论　蛛网膜下隙注射吗啡镇痛效果确切、持续时间长 ,但不良反应发生率较高于硬膜外吗啡镇痛     

Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine dose response in postpartum tubal ligation patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Because of its short duration, hyperbaric lidocaine has been a popular intrathecal drug to provide anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation (PPTL). However, reports of transient symptoms associated with its use have prompted the search for alternative intrathecal local anesthetics for short procedures. Hyperbaric bupivacaine is rarely associated with transient neurologic symptoms, and we designed this study to determine the optimal dose of bupivacaine for PPTL that assures adequate sensory block and allows the patient the shortest recovery time. METHODS: Forty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for PPTL were randomly assigned to receive 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, or 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine in the right lateral position. RESULTS: Despite sensory block above T-8 in all groups, 4 of the 5 patients in the 5-mg group developed blocks insufficiently dense for surgery and required general anesthesia. Failed spinals occurred evenly in the remaining groups. Motor regression was significantly more rapid with decreasing doses of bupivacaine. Time in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was shorter in the 7.5-mg group. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperbaric bupivacaine 7.5 mg injected in the lateral position provides adequate surgical anesthesia for PPTL with a minimal duration of motor block and recovery time.     

Anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation

Postpartum tubal ligation is an elective procedure that can be performed safely shortly after delivery, provided the patient’s labor was uncomplicated, she is hemodynamically stable, and she understands the risks and alternatives to the surgery and anesthesia. Epidural, spinal, general, or local anesthesia with sedation has been used for postpartum tubal ligation. The most convenient anesthetic is reactivation or extension of an already existing epidural, and the success is increased when postpartum tubal ligation is performed within 4 to 8 hours of delivery.

Most of the physiologic changes that occur during pregnancy are still present in the postpartum period. Postpartum patients have delayed gastric emptying of solid foods and should be given some form of gastric acid prophylaxis before inducing anesthesia.

Postpartum tubal ligation (PPTL) produces moderate to severe pain of short duration, so one must provide some form of postoperative pain relief. Although there is controversy regarding the use of ketorolac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication, in breast-feeding mothers, the American Academy of Pediatrics considers it safe. Other oral opioid and nonopioid pain medications are also effective in treating postoperative pain.     

Intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia in children after selective dorsal root rhizotomy

The authors report their experience with low doses (0.007-0.015 mg/kg), moderate doses (0.016-0.025 mg/kg), and high doses (0.026-0.035 mg/kg) of intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after selective dorsal root rhizotomy surgery in 50 children, aged 3 to 12 years. After closure of the dura, a single dose of preservative-free morphine was injected into the subarachnoid space, and patients were assessed for 48 hours for level of comfort and side effects. The three doses of morphine provided equivalent analgesia and similar side effects. The duration of postoperative analgesia ranged from 3 to 48 hours (mean, 12.2 +/- 9.5 h). Common side effects were limited to nausea and vomiting (42%) and mild facial pruritus. No patient experienced late respiratory depression or generalized pruritus. The authors conclude that low doses of intrathecal morphine is as effective as moderate or high doses of morphine for reducing pain in the immediate postoperative period. Intrathecal morphine provides excellent analgesia after selective dorsal rhizotomy.     

Intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain]

At the beginning, the way intrathecal morphine was used for postoperative pain relief was quite unfortunate, because the doses derived from experience with morphine-tolerant cancer patients were considerably too high and respiratory depression occurred frequently. Subsequent dose-finding studies showed that the doses of morphine used initially could be reduced by a factor of ten without loss of the analgesic effect and with a marked reduction in side-effects. No respiratory depression has been reported when doses below 0.1 mg morphine are used. METHOD. In this prospective study the effect of 0.06 to 0.08 mg intrathecal morphine, mixed with the local anaesthetic for spinal anesthesia, was investigated in surgical patients aged 21 to 81 years, ASA grade I or II, scheduled for orthopaedic operations or herniorraphies. Thirty unpremedicated patients were enrolled in the study and were, after informed consent, randomly allocated to a control group without morphine or to a morphine group. The analgesic effect was assessed by the time interval between the administration of the spinal anaesthesia and the first demand for an analgesic medication. The mood state was evaluated with the adjective checklist of Janke and Debus 6 h after the spinal anaesthesia. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. In the control group half of the patients asked for an analgesic medication within 275 min (median) after the spinal anaesthesia, and all patients within 420 min, whereas in the morphine group half of the patients asked for an analgesic within 1170 min (median). Seven patients had not required an analgesic at the termination of the observation period 20 h after the spinal anaesthesia. The mood status showed no difference between the two groups, in particular, no dizziness or drowsiness after morphine. There was no difference in the incidence of side-effects such as nausea or urinary retention between the two groups. Pruritus was not reported spontaneously but was found upon questioning in five patients. It was in no case disturbing. CONCLUSIONS. Morphine (0.06 to 0.08 mg) mixed with the local anaesthetic for spinal anaesthesia provided for an analgesia of more than 20 h duration in half of the patients. This technique is safe, simple, reliable and virtually free of side-effects. No particular supervision due to the administration of intrathecal morphine is necessary in this dose range if systemic opiates are avoided. If the analgesia is unsatisfactory, a non-opioid analgesic is recommended.     

Effect of epinephrine on intrathecal fentanyl analgesia in patients undergoing postpartum tubal ligation

Eighty women receiving spinal anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation were entered into a double-blind, randomized protocol studying the effects of epinephrine on intrathecal fentanyl-induced postoperative analgesia. All patients received 70 mg hyperbaric lidocaine with either 0.2 mg epinephrine (LE), 10 micrograms fentanyl (LF), epinephrine and fentanyl (LFE), or 0.4 ml saline (L). Onset and regression of anesthesia, degree of intraoperative comfort, incidence of pruritus, and extent of postoperative analgesia were evaluated. The simultaneous administration of epinephrine and fentanyl prolonged the duration of complete analgesia (137 +/- 47 min (LFE); 76 +/- 32 min (LE); 85 +/- 44 min (LF); 65 +/- 36 min (L)) and the duration of effective analgesia (562 +/- 504 min (LFE); 227 +/- 201 min (LE); 203 +/- 178 min (LF); 198 +/- 342 min (L)). Administration of epinephrine decreased the incidence of pruritus associated with intrathecal fentanyl (1/18 (LFE); 1/21 (LE); 8/19 (LF); 2/19 (L)).     

Intrathecal bupivacaine with morphine or neostigmine for postoperative analgesia after total knee replacement surgery

PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety of intrathecal (IT) neostigmine and IT morphine in patients undergoing total knee replacement under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty patients scheduled for elective total knee replacement under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into three equal groups which received IT 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg with either normal saline 0.5 mL, neostigmine 50 microg, or morphine 300 microg. The maximal level of sensory block, duration of analgesia, time to use of rescue analgesics, the overall 24-hr and four-hour interval visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, and the incidence of adverse effects were recorded for 24 hr after administration. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in maximal level of sensory block among the three groups. The morphine group had a later onset of postsurgical pain and longer time to first rescue analgesics than the neostigmine group (P <0.05). Overall 24-hr VAS pain scores were significantly higher in the saline group vs the morphine and neostigmine groups (P <0.05). Motor block lasted significantly longer in the neostigmine group than in the morphine and saline groups (P <0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was similar in the neostigmine and morphine groups except for pruritus (70%) occurring more frequently in the morphine group than in the neostigmine and saline groups (0%; P <0.05). Overall satisfaction rates were better in the neostigmine group than in the morphine and saline groups (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IT neostigmine 50 microg produced postoperative analgesia lasting about seven hours with fewer side effects and better satisfaction ratings than IT morphine 300 microg.     

Intrathecal diamorphine compared with morphine for postoperative analgesia after caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia

A randomized, double-blind study of 40 women was performed to compare patient controlled anaesthesia (PCA) morphine requirements after spinal anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section. The women received 0.2 mg of either morphine or diamorphine mixed with 0.5% bupivacaine in 8% dextrose. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of VAS for pain, either while supine or trying to turn over. The median VAS for itching were significantly higher in the morphine group at 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h. Similarly, the VAS for drowsiness were significantly higher in the morphine group at 6 and 8 h. Overall there was no difference in the 24-h PCA morphine demands between the two groups (diamorphine patients 5.5 mg, morphine patients 5.0 mg.      

Intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia in an infant with bronchopulmonary dysplasia following upper abdominal surgery

We present a case of severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in which intrathecal morphine was successfully used for analgesia after a Nissen fundoplication and gastrostomy. Various options for anaesthesia are discussed with the knowledge that two previous procedures had been complicated by congestive cardiac failure and increased respiratory failure.