中国早发性乳腺癌患者中BRCA1基因突变分析

目的研究中国早发性乳腺癌患者中BRCA1基因致病性突变的发生情况以及家族史在突变携带者识别中的作用。方法研究对象为来自中国4个乳腺癌临床医疗中心的188例早发性乳腺癌病例(发病年龄≤40岁),其中39例(20.1%)有乳腺/卵巢癌家族史。从外周静脉血提取基因组DNA,对BRCA1基因的全部编码区和外显子/内含子拼接区进行PCR扩增。其中22例通过单链构象多态方法进行突变初筛,166例用变性高效液相色谱分析进行初筛;对发现的异常片段通过DNA直接测序的方法进行确认。对发现重复出现突变的样本,选取5个与BRCA1基因连锁的标记(D17S855、D17S1322、D17S1323、D17S1326和D17S1327)进行等位基因型分析。结果在15例(8.0%)患者中发现有12个BRCA1基因的致病性突变,其中BRCA11100delAT和5589del8突变分别在3个和2个患者中发现。在39例同时伴有乳腺/卵巢癌家族史的病例中共发现有9例(23.1%)携带突变。有(无)乳腺癌家族史的早发性乳腺癌病例间BRCA1基因的突变率的差异有统计学意义(P=0.001)。重复出现的突变在所有检测病例中出现的频率为2.7%,在所有检测到的突变中占33.3%。两个来自中国北方的BRCA11100delAT突变携带病例有相同的等位基因型,而与来自上海地区的此突变携带者的等位基因型在D17S1322位点上有所差异。两例5589del8突变携带者在所检测的5个STR位点上有完全相同的等位基因型。结论这是到目前为止较大规模的关于中国早发性乳腺癌人群的BRCA1基因突变的研究,有助于增加对中国早发性乳腺癌人群中BRCA1基因致病性突变分布的全面认识。在中国早发性乳腺癌人群中,BRCA1基因致病性突变在肿瘤的发生中有比较重要的意义,尤其在伴有乳腺/卵巢癌家族史病例中该基因突变的意义尤为突出。两个重复出现的突变可能在中国人群中有始祖效应,在进行全基因检测前对其先进行检测可能非常合算。     

山东半岛地区家族性和早发性乳腺癌BRCA2基因突变研究

目的 研究山东半岛地区家族性和早发性乳腺癌中乳腺癌易感基因BRCA2的突变位点及携带情况.方法 应用PureGene DNA纯化系统提取52例家族性和早发性乳腺癌患者的外周血单核细胞DNA,对BRCA2基因的全部编码序列及内含子和外显子拼接区进行扩增,扩增产物用变性高效液相色谱进行初筛,对发现异常片段经重新扩增后进行DNA测序证实.结果 在52例乳腺癌患者中发现3个(5.8%)BRCA2的致病性突变(2001delTTAT,4099＞T,5873C＞A).其中,家族性乳腺癌突变率达到12%(3/25),在单纯早发性乳腺癌病例中未发现致病性突变.结论 在家族性乳腺癌患者中,BRCA2基因突变可能具有重要作用,在此人群中有必要进行相关的基因检测.     

CHEK2基因c.1100delC与中国人遗传性乳腺癌易感性的关联研究

目的研究上海地区非BRCA1／2基因突变的遗传倾向乳腺癌中CHEK2基因c．1100delC突变的携带情况及可能的作用。方法研究对象来自114例遗传倾向性乳腺癌，包括家族性乳腺癌76例，其中8例发病年龄低于40岁；38例单纯早发性乳腺癌（发病年龄〈40岁）。对照组为121名无乳腺癌的健康女性，静脉血中提取基因组DNA，对CHEK2基因的第10～14外显子进行长片段PCR扩增，PCR产物再进行含突变的第10外显子的扩增。突变分析全部由DNA直接测序进行鉴定。结果研究人群和对照人群中都没有发现c．1100delC的突变；在3例（3／114，2．6％）家族性乳腺癌中发现邻近c．1100delC的新的错义突变位点1111C〉T（p-His371 Tyr），对照组中则无此突变发现。结论CHEK2基因c．1100delC突变可能是中国人群罕见的突变位点，在中国人乳腺癌遗传易感性中的作用非常有限；1111C〉T可能与中国上海地区遗传倾向乳腺癌低度外显的易感性有关，需要进行进一步研究确认。     

维吾尔族及汉族早发性乳腺癌 BRCA1基因突变分析

目的研究维吾尔族及汉族早发性乳腺癌患者BRCA1突变情况及突变位置。方法选取35例维吾尔族及汉族早发性乳腺癌根治标本（其中维吾尔族早发性乳腺癌22例，汉族乳腺癌13例），对照组为32例维汉族乳腺良性病变（纤维腺病及纤维腺瘤）及乳腺癌旁非癌组织；运用PCR—SSCP和DNA序列测定的方法检测BRCA1基因突变。结果（1）35例新疆早发性乳腺癌（≤35岁）BRCA1突变率为22．86％（8／35），22例维吾尔族早发性乳腺癌BRCA1突变率为31．82％（7／22）。（2）35例新疆早发性乳腺癌中发现8例BRCA1突变的12个新位点，其中2例突变位点IVS20-68insA均为维吾尔族早发性乳腺癌患者。（3）35例新疆早发性乳腺癌中发现7例BRCA1基因核苷酸多态性，对照组32例维吾尔族及汉族乳腺癌旁非癌组织及乳腺良性病变中仅发现1例BRCA1基因核苷酸的多态性。结论BRCA1突变可能与新疆早发性乳腺癌尤其是维吾尔族早发性乳腺癌密切相关，其突变位点IVS20—68insA可能是新疆维吾尔族早发性乳腺癌的遗传易感性位点，尚需扩大样本进一步研究证实。     

家族性乳腺癌遗传易感基因研究现状

家族性乳腺癌与遗传易感基因的突变有密切的联系 ,目前已发现多种乳腺癌遗传易感基因 ,它们分别定位于 17号和 13号染色体的长臂和 8号染色体的短臂上。乳腺癌家族中易感基因突变携带者患乳腺癌的危险性明显高于普通人群 ,具有不同易感基因突变的乳腺癌患者其组织学特征也有所不同。本文就家族性乳腺癌遗传易感基因的研究进展作一综述     

新疆地区维吾尔族乳腺癌BRCA1基因突变分析

目的研究新疆地区维吾尔族乳腺癌患者BRCA1基因突变情况及突变位置。方法选取70例维吾尔族乳腺癌根治标本,对照组为32例维汉族乳腺良性病变（纤维腺病及纤维腺瘤）及乳腺癌旁非癌组织;应用PCR-单链构象多态性和DNA序列测定的方法检测BRCA1基因突变。结果（1）70例维吾尔族乳腺癌中发现9例BRCA1突变的12个新位点。（2）70例维吾尔族乳腺癌BRCA1的突变率为12.86%（9/70）,22例维吾尔族早发性乳腺癌（≤35岁）BRCA1突变率为31.82%（7/22）。维吾尔族早发性乳腺癌BRCA1突变率（7/22）高于维吾尔族晚发性乳腺癌（2/48）,差异有统计学意义（χ^2=10.295,P〈0.01）。（3）70例维吾尔族乳腺癌中发现9例BRCA1基因核苷酸多态性位点,其中8例多态性位点均为3232A〉G。（4）2例双侧乳腺癌中均检测出BRCA1基因的突变。结论BRCA1突变可能与新疆维吾尔族乳腺癌尤其是维吾尔族早发性乳腺癌及双侧乳腺癌的发生密切相关。     

中国上海家族性乳腺癌BRCA1和BRCA2基因的突变

目的研究上海地区家族性乳腺癌中BRCA1／BRCA2基因的突变位点及携带情况。方法研究对象来自35个汉族家族性乳腺癌家系，家系中至少有一个一级亲属乳腺癌患病史。共35例患者，其中13例发病年龄≤加岁。由静脉血提取基因组DNA，对BRCA1／BRCA2基因的全部编码序列进行扩增。扩增产物突变分析先由变性高效液相色谱分析进行筛查，之后进行DNA直接测序证实。结果在BRCA1基因中发现有4个突变位点，其中2个为新发现位点——拼接点突变（IVS17-1G〉T；IVS21＋1G〉C）；另两个为已报道的致病突变位点——移码突变（1100delAT；5640delA）。BRCA2基因的1个致病突变位点位于11号外显子上，为移码突变（5802delAATT）。另外，共发现有12个新的单核苷重复多态位点，都未引起氨基酸编码改变；其中，8个在BRCA1基因上，4个在BRCA2基因上。在家族性乳腺癌中，BRCA1突变频率（11．4％）高于BRCA2基因（2．9％）。结论新发现的2个BRCA1基因的拼接点突变可能是中国上海人群家族性乳腺癌的特有突变位点；在我国上海地区人群中，BRCA1基因突变起着比BRCA2基因更大的作用；该研究丰富了中国人群中BRCA基因的突变谱，并为未来的临床基因检测提供了筛查模式。     

早发性乳腺癌/卵巢癌BRCA1基因突变分析

目的探讨中国北方地区汉族人群早发性乳腺癌和卵巢癌与BRCA1基因的关系.方法应用聚合酶链反应-单链构象多态性分析和DNA直接测序法检测BRCA1基因外显子2和外显子11部分序列.结果对12例早发性乳腺癌/卵巢癌患者PCR-SSCP的检测中,在外显子2发现1例突变,经DNA测序证实突变为第166碱基插入碱基"C".结论 BRCA1基因突变可能与北方地区汉族人群早发性乳腺癌有关.     

中国福建遗传性乳腺癌BRCAl基因突变分析

目的 研究福建遗传性乳腺癌患者BRCAI基因突变位点及携带情况.方法 对20例遗传性乳腺癌患者血液标本进行检测,对其BRCA1基因第11号外显子全序列进行DNA测序.结果 20例标本中检出5患者存在共计9种BRCA1基因突变,其中3个为新发现住点(错义突变1159T>C,4071A>C;同义突变4122C>T);其它6个已报道位点中2个(2201C>T,2430T>C)为同义突变,其余4个(2685T>C,2731C>T,3232A>G,3667A>G)属错义突变,本研究中BRCA1突变率为25%.结论 福建遗传性乳腺癌患者BRCA1基因突变具有地域性特征,开展BRCA1基因突变检测有助于本地区女性患癌风险评估和早期诊断.     

早发性帕金森病患者中Parkin, LRRK2基因序列变异研究

目的观察散发性早发帕金森病(Parkinsons disease,PD)患者遗传易感基因突变的形式和分布,探讨易感基因突变在PD发病中的可能作用。方法病例组由13例散发性早发帕金森患者组成。以基因组DNA为模板,扩增Parkin基因的第1、4、6号外显子和LRRK2基因的第31号外显子。观察PCR产物测序后的突变情况。结果发现样本中存在突变,在正常人中存在单核苷酸多态性(single nucleotide polymorphism,SNP)。结论Parkin基因外显子的突变是我国散发性早发PD患者的致病原因之一。     

维吾尔族和汉族散发性乳腺癌患者BRCA1/2基因突变的检测

目的探讨新疆维吾尔族和汉族散发性乳腺癌患者乳腺癌易感基因1/2(BRCA1/2)突变情况及与临床病理参数的关系。方法采用PCR和DNA直接测序法,对新疆地区230例散发性乳腺癌患者(维吾尔族、汉族各115例)石蜡组织进行BRCA1基因第2、11(11A和11B)、20号外显子和BRCA2基因第11号部分外显子,共5对引物进行突变检测。结果 230例乳腺癌患者中,BRCA基因突变率为6.96%(16/230),其中1例BRCA1基因-5 382位点的突变及7例新发突变位点;维吾尔族和汉族患者中BRCA基因突变检出率分别为7.83%(9/115)和6.09%(7/115);BRCA基因突变组发病年龄均≤50岁;突变组16例患者中绝经前患者(13例)的突变率明显高于绝经后患者(3例)(P0.05)。结论 BRCA1基因突变可能与新疆地区散发性乳腺癌发生相关。     

BRCA1 Germ‐Line Mutations and Tumor Characteristics in Eastern Chinese Women with Familial Breast Cancer

Although several studies detected the BRCA1 germ‐line mutations in Chinese women with familial breast cancer, most of them did not employ conventional full gene sequencing, especially in eastern China. In addition, the clinicopathological features of BRCA1‐associated breast cancer in Chinese women were not well investigated. In this study, we screened the complete coding regions and exon‐intron boundaries of BRCA1 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐sequencing assay. Immunohistochemistry analyses were performed on tumor samples to detect the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), P53, and human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2 (HER‐2). Breast cancer patients having one or more affected relatives referred from the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, eastern China during 2008–2011 were selected for the study. A total of 62 familial breast cancer patients received the BRCA1 germ‐line mutation screening. Five deleterious mutations were detected in this cohort. The mutation rate was 11.3% (7/62). We found two novel mutations (3414delC and 5,280 C > T) and two recurrent mutations (5,273 G > A and 5589del8). BRCA1 mutation tumors tended to be negative for ER, PR, and HER‐2, and exhibited high histological grade compared with tumors without BRCA1 mutations. Our study suggests that recurrent mutations may exist in eastern Chinese women with familial breast cancer and PCR‐sequencing assay is a useful tool to screen these mutations. It also suggests that BRCA1‐associated breast cancers in Chinese women exhibit an aggressive phenotype. Anat Rec, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

De novo recurrent germline mutation of the BRCA2 gene in a patient with early onset breast cancer

Germline mutations in either of the two major breast cancer predisposition genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, account for a significant proportion of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Identification of breast cancer patients carrying mutations of these genes is primarily based on a positive family history of breast/ovarian cancer or early onset of the disease or both. In the course of mutation screening of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in a hospital based series of patients with risk factors for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, we identified a germline mutation in the BRCA2 gene (3034del4) in a patient with early onset breast cancer and no strong family history of the disease. Subsequent molecular analysis in her parents showed that neither of them carried the mutation. Paternity was confirmed using a set of highly polymorphic markers, showing that the proband carried a de novo germline mutation in the BRCA2 gene. Interestingly, 3034del4 is a recurrent mutation occurring in a putative mutation prone region of the BRCA2 gene. Our study presents the first case in which a de novo germline mutation in the BRCA2 gene has been identified, and supports previous results of haplotype studies, confirming that the 3034del4 mutation has multiple independent origins.


Keywords: breast cancer; BRCA2 gene; de novo mutation     

Strong founder effects in BRCA1 mutation carrier breast cancer patients from Latvia

Germ‐line mutations of the BRCA1 gene account for approximately half of the cases of hereditary breast/ovarian cancers. We have screened index patients from 15 breast cancer families and 8 sporadic breast cancer patients from Latvia for mutations in all coding exons of the BRCA1 gene, using combined Heteroduplex Analysis/SSCP followed by direct sequencing of the variants. BRCA1 germ‐line mutations proved to be frequent in Latvian breast cancer patients, also in moderate‐risk families and sporadic patients. Out of 23 cases a total of 8 patients (35%) exhibited three different mutations (5382insC, C61G, 4153delA). Interestingly, these three recurrent mutations accounted for all mutations in our sample set and no unique mutation was found. The 5382insC and C61G mutations accounted for 63% (5/8) and 25% (2/8) of all mutations, respectively. Allelotyping suggested a common founder in each recurrent mutation. Additional one‐hundred hospital‐based incident breast cancer patients were screened for the three mutations and 4 other 5382insC mutation carriers were identified (4%). Patients with C61G and 4153delA mutations were all Latvians, whilst the majority of 5382insC carriers (7/9=78%) were of Russian ethnicity, which is intriguing for the supposed Baltic origin of this mutation. Hum Mutat 14:92, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

海南西部地区乳腺癌患者 BRCA1 / 2 基因突变状态分析

目的 不同的区域及种族的 BRCA1 / 2 基因突变频率差异较大, 着重分析海南西部地区乳腺癌患 者 BRCA1 / 2 基因的突变状态及对患者预后的影响。 方法 选取 2015 年 10 月 ~ 2020 年 12 月在海南西部中 心医院住院并确诊为原发性乳腺癌的 256 例患者为研究对象, 采用变性高效液相色谱法 ( denaturing high performance liquid chromatography, DHPLC) 筛查乳腺癌患者是否存在 BRCA1 / 2 基因突变, 分析 BRCA1 / 2 基 因突变状态及 BRCA1 / 2 基因突变患者的临床特征, 并随访分析患者 5 年生存情况, COX 回归分析影响患者 预后的因素。 结果 256 例乳腺癌患者中共检出 53 例患者发生 BRCA1 / 2 基因突变, 其中 BRCA1 突变率 12. 11 % (31 / 256), BRCA2 突变率 8. 59 % (22 / 256), 其中有害变异率为 7. 03 % (18 / 256)。 BRCA1 / 2 基 因突变患者家族病史、 妇科疾病史、 乳腺疾病史、 雌激素受体 (estrogen receptor, ER)、 原癌基因 (CerbB2) 蛋白阳性比例以及临床病理分级、 临床分期与未突变患者比较差异有统计学意义 (P< 0. 05)。 患者总 体生存率为 83. 59 % , BRCA1 / 2 基因突变者生存率低于未突变者 (P< 0. 05), COX 回归分析显示, BRCA1 / 2 基因突变、 乳腺疾病史、 临床分期、 CerbB-2 阳性、 CEA、 CA199 均是影响乳腺癌患者生存的危险因素 (P< 0. 05)。 结论 通过 DHPLC 可有效筛查海南西部地区乳腺癌患者 BRCA1 / 2 基因的有害变异, BRCA1 / 2 基因突变与临床病理特征及预后密切相关。     

Recurrent BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in ovarian cancer: a founder mutation of BRCA1 identified in the Chinese population

Previous mutational analysis for BRCA gene mutations in sporadic ovarian cancer occurring in Chinese patients in Hong Kong identified six germline BRCA1 mutations and one germline BRCA2 mutation, six of which were novel (Khoo et al., 2000). Knowledge of BRCA gene mutations in the Chinese population is relatively scant. In this study, we focussed on whether any of these mutations could be recurrent in our Chinese population, making use of archival paraffin embedded tissue. A consecutive series of 214 ovarian cancer cases, half of Southern Chinese origin from Hong Kong whilst the other half of Northern Chinese origin from Beijing were used for the study. We identified one further novel mutation, 1081delG, in BRCA1. This was found to occur in two unrelated individuals with shared haplotype as revealed by allelotype analysis, thus demonstrating founder effect. Two other recurrent mutations were also identified, the 2371-2372delTG mutation in BRCA1 and the 3337C>T mutation in BRCA2 recurring in two and three unrelated individuals respectively, giving an overall prevalence 4.7% of recurrent BRCA mutations in ovarian cancer in the Southern Chinese population. Most importantly, all our recurrent mutation carriers were identified from Southern Chinese patients from Hong Kong whilst such mutations were absent in samples from the Northern Chinese. Our findings indicate possible heterogeneity in the BRCA genotype between Northern and Southern Chinese. The identification of a founder mutation and two recurrent mutations moreover, has important implications towards screening strategies for breast and ovarian cancer among Chinese of southern ancestral origin who are now dispersed throughout the world.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women with familial or early-onset breast/ovarian cancer in the Czech Republic

Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for majority of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The complete coding sequence analysis of both genes was carried out in 197 breast/ovarian cancer patients from high-risk families and 53 patients with sporadic breast/ovarian cancer. In summary, 59 mutations (16 different) in BRCA1 and 29 mutations (17 different) in BRCA2 were identified in unrelated breast and/or ovarian index cases. Using the BIC Database numbering, the most frequently found mutations in BRCA1 were c.5385dupC (22 cases), c.3819_3823delGTAAA (8 cases) and c.300T>G (6 cases). The most frequently found mutations in BRCA2 were c.8138_8142delCCTTT (7 cases) and c.8765_8766delAG (7 cases). Altogether, these 5 mutations represented 56.8% of all detected mutations. A broad spectrum of other mutations was detected including four novel mutations (c.2881delA in BRCA1; and c. 6677_6678delAA, c.6982dupT and c.8397_8400dupTGGG in BRCA2). Deleterious mutations were found in 80 (40.6%) of 197 high risk-families, in 6 (37.5%) of 16 patients with sporadic bilateral breast, ovarian or both cancers and in 2 (6.2%) of 32 women with sporadic early-onset unilateral breast cancer. No mutation was detected in 5 cases of sporadic early-onset unilateral ovarian cancer.