Repositioning accuracy of a commercially available thermoplastic mask system.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the repositioning accuracy of a commercially available thermoplastic mask system for single dose radiosurgery treatments and fractionated treatment courses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The repositioning accuracy of the Raycast-HP mask system (Orfit Industries, Wijnegem, Belgium) was analyzed. Twenty-two patients that were treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or intensity modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) for 43 intracranial lesions, underwent repeated CT imaging during their course of treatment, or as a positional control immediately before radiosurgery. We evaluated multiple anatomical landmark coordinates and their respective shifts in consecutive repeated CT-controls. An iterative optimization algorithm allowed for the calculation of the x, y and z-components of translation of the target isocenter(s) for each repeated CT, as well as rotation in the respective CT data sets. In addition to absolute target isocenter translation, the total magnitude vector (i.e. sum-vector) of isocenter motion was calculated along with patient rotations about the three principle axes. RESULTS: Fifty-five control CT datasets were analyzed for the target isocenter's respective position relative to the original treatment planning CT simulation. Mean target isocenter translation was 0.74+/-0.53, 0.75+/-0.60 and 0.93+/-0.78 mm in x, y and z-directions, respectively. Mean rotation about the x, y and z-axes was 0.67+/-0.66, 0.61+/-0.63 and 0.67+/-0.61 degrees, respectively. The respective median and mean magnitude vectors of isocenter translation were 1.28 and 1.59+/-0.84 mm. Analysis of the accuracy of the first setup control, representative of setup accuracy for radiosurgery treatments, compared with setup accuracy throughout a fractionated radiation treatment course were statistically equivalent (P= 0.15) thus indicating no measurable deterioration of setup accuracy throughout the treatment course. CONCLUSIONS: The analyzed Orfit thermoplastic mask system performed favorably compared with other mask immobilization systems for which peer-reviewed repositioning data exist. While the performance of the system for fractionated treatment courses was considered to be excellent, use of this mask system for radiosurgery immobilization in our clinic is subject to additional quality assurance measures to prohibit the delivery of treatments with target dislocations larger than 2 mm. The measured data in the present study should enable the users of this system to assign appropriate margins for the generation of planning target volumes.     

Repositioning accuracy of a commercially available double-vacuum whole body immobilization system for stereotactic body radiation therapy

We evaluated the repositioning accuracy of a commercially available stereotactic whole body immobilization system (BodyFIX, Medical Intelligence, Schwabmuenchen, Germany) in 36 patients treated by hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy. CT data were acquired for positional control of patient and tumor before each fraction of the treatment course. Those control CT datasets were compared with the original treatment planning CT simulation and analyzed with respect to positional misalignment of bony patient anatomy, and the respective position of the treated small lung or liver lesions. We assessed the stereotactic coordinates of distinct bony anatomical landmarks in the original CT and each control dataset. In addition, the target isocenter was recorded in the planning CT simulation dataset. An iterative optimization algorithm was implemented, utilizing a root mean square scoring function to determine the best-fit orientation of subsequent sets of anatomical landmark measurements relative to the original treatment planning CT data set. This allowed for the calculation of the x, y and z-components of translation of the patient's body and the target's center-of-mass for each control CT study, as well as rotation about the principal room axes in the respective CT data sets. In addition to absolute patient/target translation, the total magnitude vector of patient and target misalignment was calculated. A clinical assessment determined whether or not the assigned planning target volume safety margins would have provided the desired target coverage. To this end, each control CT study was co-registered with the original treatment planning study using immobilization system related fiducial markers, and the computed isodose calculation was superimposed. In 109 control setup CT scans available for comparison with their respective treatment planning CT simulation study (2-5 per patient, median 3), anatomical landmark analysis revealed a mean bony landmark translation of -0.4 +/- 3.9 (mean +/- SD), -0.1 +/- 1.6 and 0.3 +/- 3.6 mm in x, y and z-directions, respectively. Bony landmark setup deviations along one or more principal axis larger than 5 mm were observed in 32 control CT studies (29.4%). Body rotations about the x-, y- and z-axis were 0.9 +/- 0.7, 0.8 +/- 0.7 and 1.8 +/- 1.6 degrees, respectively. Assuming a rigid body relationship of target and bony anatomy, the mean computed absolute target translation was 2.9 +/- 3.3, 2.3 +/- 2.5 and 3.2 +/- 2.7 mm in x, y and z-directions, respectively. The median and mean magnitude vector of target isocenter displacement was computed to be 4.9 mm, and 5.7 +/- 3.7 mm. Clinical assessment of PTV/target volume coverage revealed 72 (66.1%), 23 (21.1%), and 14 (12.8%), of excellent (100% isodose coverage), good (>90% isodose coverage), and poor GTV/isodose alignment quality (less than 90% isodose coverage to some aspect of the GTV), respectively. Loss of target volume dose coverage was correlated with translations >5 mm along one or more axes (p<0.0001), rotations >3 degrees about the z-axis (p=0.0007) and body mass index >30 (p<0.0001). The analyzed BodyFIX whole body immobilization system performed favorably compared with other stereotactic body immobilization systems for which peer-reviewed repositioning data exist. While the measured variability in patient and target setup provided clinically acceptable setup accuracy in the vast majority of cases, larger setup deviations were occasional observed. Such deviations constitute a potential for partial target underdosing warranting, in our opinion, a pre-delivery positional assessment procedure (e.g., pre-treatment control CT scan).     

Isocenter accuracy in frameless stereotactic radiotherapy using implanted fiducials

PURPOSE: The stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) system verifies isocenter accuracy in patient space. In this study, we evaluate isocenter accuracy in frameless SRT using implanted cranial gold markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed frameless SRT on 43 intracranial tumor patients between August 1997 and December 2000. The treatment technique was determined by the tumor shape and volume, and by the location of critical organs. The coordinates of anterior-posterior and lateral port film were inputted to ISOLOC software, which calculated (1) the couch moves translation distance required to bring the target point to the isocenter, and (2) the intermarker distance comparisons between the CT study and the treatment machine films. We evaluated the isocenter deviation based on the error between orthogonal film target coordinates and isocenter coordinates. RESULTS: The mean treatment isocenter deviations (x, y, z) were -0.03, 0.14, and -0.04 mm, respectively. The systematic component isocenter standard deviations were 0.28, 0.31, and 0.35 mm (1 SD), respectively, and the random component isocenter standard deviations were 0.53, 0.52, and 0.50 mm (1 SD), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The isocenter accuracy in the frameless SRT-implanted fiducial system is highly reliable and is comparable to that of other stereotactic radiosurgery systems.     

Commissioning and clinical results utilizing the Gildenberg-Laitinen Adapter Device for X-ray in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: The Gildenberg-Laitinen Adapter Device for X-Ray (GLAD-X/LS) frame is a positioning device that allows the use of the same fiducial points as the Brown-Robert-Wells (BRW) system. Thus it permits treatment planning to be accomplished by the Radionics X-knife Radiosurgery Program. We investigated the commissioning and clinical benefits of the GLAD-X/LS for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) in patients who were unable to tolerate the Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) frame. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Commissioning of the GLAD-X/LS system was done via use of a Rando Phantom. A target volume of 2 x 2 x 2 cm was drilled into the phantom head. An ion chamber and thermoluminescence dosimetric chips (TLDs) were implanted in the target. A simulated treatment course consisting of 5 stereotactic radiotherapy fractions (300 cGy, 30 mm collimator) was delivered to the phantom head. A total of 27 patients who could not tolerate the GTC frame were treated using the GLAD-X/LS system. A total of 35 isocenters were used; the median number of treatment fractions was eight. Reproducibility of the x, y, and z coordinates was examined and correlated to the same determined using orthogonal port films. Relocation accuracy and reproducibility were further assessed comparing the x, y, and z coordinates of the target center with multiplanar reconstructed coronal and sagittal images. Patient tolerance of the device was also evaluated daily throughout the treatment. RESULTS: The measured TLD and ion chamber doses were within 3% of the prescribed dose at the isocenter. The same dose accuracy was also found at incremental distances of 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm from the isocenter. All patients tolerated the treatment and the device well. Six patients experienced mild ear canal pain, and softer or smaller earpieces were substituted. The mean relocation accuracy was 1.5 mm +/- 0.8. CONCLUSIONS: The GLAD-X/LS system has excellent accuracy and reproducibility with the mean relocation accuracy of 1.5 mm +/- 0.8. The device is well-tolerated by patients, with no significant complications. Larger scale studies are necessary before routine use can be recommended for the administration of FSRT.     

Single-fraction vs. fractionated linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: a single-institution study

PURPOSE: In this single-institution trial, we investigated whether fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy is superior to single-fraction linac-based radiosurgery with respect to treatment-related toxicity and local control in patients with vestibular schwannoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All 129 vestibular schwannoma patients treated between 1992 and June 2000 at our linac-based radiosurgery facility were analyzed with respect to treatment schedule. Dentate patients were prospectively selected for a fractionated schedule of 5 x 4 Gy and later on 5 x 5 Gy at the 80% isodose in 1 week with a relocatable stereotactic frame. Edentate patients were prospectively selected for a nonfractionated treatment of 1 x 10 Gy and later on 1 x 12.5 Gy at 80% isodose with an invasive stereotactic frame. Both MRI and CT scans were made in all 129 patients within 1 week before treatment. All patients were followed yearly with MRI and physical examination. RESULTS: A fractionated schedule was given to 80 patients and a single fraction to 49 patients. Mean follow-up time was 33 months (range: 12-107 months). There was no statistically significant difference between the single-fraction group and the fractionated group with respect to mean tumor diameter (2.6 vs. 2.5 cm) or mean follow-up time (both 33 months). Only mean age (63 years vs. 49 years) was statistically significantly different (p = 0.001). Outcome differences between the single-fraction treatment group and the fractionated treatment group with respect to 5-year local control probability (100% vs. 94%), 5-year facial nerve preservation probability (93% vs. 97%), and 5-year hearing preservation probability (75% vs. 61%) were not statistically significant. The difference in 5-year trigeminal nerve preservation (92% vs. 98%) reached statistical significance (p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Linac-based single-fraction radiosurgery seems to be as good as linac-based fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in vestibular schwannoma patients, except for a small difference in trigeminal nerve preservation rate in favor of a fractionated schedule.     

鼻咽癌适形调强放射治疗中计划靶体积不确定度的研究

背景与目的:鼻咽癌的适形调强放疗为减少正常组织的放射损伤,提高患者的生存质量提供了契机.但是,高度适形的治疗技术使肿瘤和正常组织之间的剂量梯度变得非常陡峭,每日的摆位不确定度对理想化的治疗计划产生的影响也会因此而加大.本研究探讨使用热塑面罩固定时,该治疗过程的摆位不确定度,以及为补偿这种不确定度需要在临床靶体积周围所加的安全边界的大小.方法:选取首次做适形调强放疗的早期鼻咽癌患者19例.每周进行一次CT重复扫描,方法与做治疗计划时完全相同.共获取85次扫描参数.通过读图软件对每周扫描的CT图像与计划设计的CT图像进行比较,求出每次摆位与首次定位时感兴趣的解剖标记点在三维方向上的差异.结果:19例患者的85次扫描参数比较,不同解剖骨性标记点在X、Y、Z方向的绝对位移值分别为(0.89±0.69)mm、(0.82±0.79)mm、(0.95±1.24)mm、矢量位移的系统误差分别为0.94 mm、1.00mm、1.32mm,随机误差分别为0.87 mm、0.80 mm、1.04 mm.等中心点的三维矢量位移的平均值为1.87 mm,95%可信区间为2.03～7.24 mm,平均值3.82 mm.结论:对早期鼻咽癌患者的适形调强放疗,其X、Y、Z轴向上由临床靶体积统一外扩3.00 mm形成临床靶体积-计划靶体积安全边界来弥补由于体位固定的不确定度对靶区剂量分布造成的影响应该是足够的.     

Three-dimensional conformal setup (3D-CSU) of patients using the coordinate system provided by three internal fiducial markers and two orthogonal diagnostic X-ray systems in the treatment room

PURPOSE: To test the accuracy of a system for correcting for the rotational error of the clinical target volume (CTV) without having to reposition the patient using three fiducial markers and two orthogonal fluoroscopic images. We call this system "three-dimensional conformal setup" (3D-CSU). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three 2.0-mm gold markers are inserted into or adjacent to the CTV. On the treatment couch, the actual positions of the three markers are calculated based on two orthogonal fluoroscopies crossing at the isocenter of the linear accelerator. Discrepancy of the actual coordinates of gravity center of three markers from its planned coordinates is calculated. Translational setup error is corrected by adjustment of the treatment couch. The rotation angles (alpha, beta, gamma) of the coordinates of the actual CTV relative to the planned CTV are calculated around the lateral (x), craniocaudal (y), and anteroposterior (z) axes of the planned CTV. The angles of the gantry head, collimator, and treatment couch of the linear accelerator are adjusted according to the rotation of the actual coordinates of the tumor in relation to the planned coordinates. We have measured the accuracy of 3D-CSU using a static cubic phantom. RESULTS: The gravity center of the phantom was corrected within 0.9 +/- 0.3 mm (mean +/- SD), 0.4 +/- 0.2 mm, and 0.6 +/- 0.2 mm for the rotation of the phantom from 0-30 degrees around the x, y, and z axes, respectively, every 5 degrees. Dose distribution was shown to be consistent with the planned dose distribution every 10 degrees of the rotation from 0-30 degrees. The mean rotational error after 3D-CSU was -0.4 +/- 0.4 (mean +/- SD), -0.2 +/- 0.4, and 0.0 +/- 0.5 degrees around the x, y, and z axis, respectively, for the rotation from 0-90 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Phantom studies showed that 3D-CSU is useful for performing rotational correction of the target volume without correcting the position of the patient on the treatment couch. The 3D-CSU will be clinically useful for tumors in structures such as paraspinal diseases and prostate cancers not subject to large internal organ motion.     

鼻咽癌三维适形和调强放疗过程中头部与颈部摆位误差比较研究

目的 探讨鼻咽癌三维适形、调强放疗过程中头部和颈部摆位误差是否存在差异.方法 选择中晚期鼻咽癌(T2～4N1～3M0期)患者19例,头颈肩热塑面罩固定,将等中心点置于鼻咽腔附近.由三维激光灯在面罩上定出左、中、右原始十字标志点,并贴上直径约为0.3 mm的铅珠作为显像标记,然后CT扫描.将CT图像通过网络传至Peacock逆向计划系统进行计划设计,然后实施治疗.治疗1～6周每周在CT模拟机进行重复扫描,扫描及固定和摆位方法都与进行计划CT时相同.将每周验证体位重复性CT图像与计划CT图像通过读图软件进行比较,并利用双独立样本t检验头、颈部摆位误差.结果 左右、上下、头脚方向上颈部摆位误差分别为(2.44±2.24)、(2.05±1.42)、(1.83±1.53) mm,头部摆位误差分别为(1.05±0.87)、(1.23±1.05)、(1.17±1.55) mm;颈部和头部的摆位误差差异有统计学意义(t=-6.58、-5.28、-3.42,P=0.000、0.000、0.001).左右、上下、头脚方向上颈部系统误差分别是头部的2.33、1.67、1.56倍,颈部随机误差分别是头部的2.57、1.34、0.99倍.结论 鼻咽癌三维适形、调强放疗过程中采用头颈肩热塑面罩固定情况下,颈部的摆位误差大于头部.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the positioning errors of head and neck during intensity-modulated radiation therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Methods Nineteen patients with middle-advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (T2-4N1-3M0), treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy, underwent repeated CT during their 6-week treatment course.All the patients were immobilized by head-neck-shoulder thermoplastic mask.We evaluated their anatomic landmark coordinated in a total of 66 repeated CT data sets and respective x, y, z shifts relative to their position in the planning CT.ResultsThe positioning error of the neck was 2.44 mm±2.24 mm,2.05 mm±1.42 mm,1.83 mm±1.53 mm in x, y, z respectively.And that of the head was 1.05 mm±0.87 mm,1.23 mm±1.05 mm,1.17 mm±1.55 mm respectively.The positioning error between neck and head have respectively statistical difference (t=-6.58,-5.28,-3.42,P=0.000,0.000,0.001).The system error of the neck was 2.33,1.67 and 1.56 higher than that of the head, respectively in left-right, vertical and head-foot directions;and the random error of neck was 2.57,1.34 and 0.99 higher than that of head respectively.Conclusions In the process of the intensity-modulated radiation therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, with the immobilization by head-neck-shoulder thermoplastic mask, the positioning error of neck is higher than that of head.     

Measurement of beam-axis displacement from the isocenter during three-dimensional conformal radiosurgery with a micro-multileaf collimator.

We describe the displacement of the beam-axis from the planning isocenter in clinical situations during three-dimensional conformal radiosurgery using an Acculeaf bi-directional micro-multileaf collimator. The displacements were recorded for 64 ports using a video imaging system and a stereotactic arc. The mean displacement was 0.41+/-0.25 mm.     

Image-guided and intensity-modulated radiosurgery for patients with spinal metastasis

BACKGROUND: Radiosurgery can deliver a single, large radiation dose to a localized tumor using a stereotactic approach and hence, requires accurate and precise delivery of radiation to the target. Of the extracranial organ targets, the spine is considered a suitable site for radiosurgery, because there is minimal or no breathing-related organ movement. The authors studied spinal radiosurgery in patients with spinal metastases to determine its accuracy and precision. METHODS: The spinal radiosurgery program was based on an image-guided and intensity-modulated, shaped-beam radiosurgical unit. It is equipped with micromultileaf collimators for beam shaping and radiation intensity modulation and with a noninvasive, frameless positioning device that uses infrared, passive marker technology together with corroborative image fusion of the digitally reconstructed image from computed tomography (CT) simulation and orthogonal X-ray imagery at the treatment position. These images were compared with the port films that were taken at the time of treatment to determine the accuracy of the isocenter position. Clinical feasibility was tested in 10 patients who had spinal metastasis with or without spinal cord compression. The patients were treated with fractionated external beam radiotherapy followed by single-dose radiosurgery as a boost (6-8 grays) to the most involved portion of the spine or to the site of spinal cord compression. RESULTS: The accuracy for the isocenter was within 1.36 mm +/- 0.11 mm, as measured by image fusion of the digitally reconstructed image from CT simulation and the port film. Clinically, the majority of patients had prompt pain relief within 2-4 weeks of treatment. Complete and partial recovery of motor function also was achieved in patients with spinal cord compression. The radiation dose to the spinal cord was minimal. The maximum dose of radiation to the anterior edge of the spinal cord within a transverse section, on average, was 50% of the prescribed dose. There was no acute radiation toxicity detected clinically during the mean follow-up of 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Image-guided, shaped-beam spinal radiosurgery is accurate and precise. Rapid clinical improvement of pain and neurologic function also may be achieved. The results indicate the potential of spinal radiosurgery in the treatment of patients with spinal metastasis, especially those with solitary sites of spine involvement, to increase the prospects of long-term palliation.     

Noninvasive patient fixation for extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the setup accuracy that can be achieved with a novel noninvasive patient fixation technique based on a body cast attached to a recently developed stereotactic body frame during fractionated extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-one CT studies (> or = 20 slices, thickness: 3 mm) from 5 patients who were immobilized in a body cast attached to a stereotactic body frame for treatment of paramedullary tumors in the thoracic or lumbar spine were evaluated with respect to setup accuracy. The immobilization device consisted of a custom-made wrap-around body cast that extended from the neck to the thighs and a separate head mask, both made from Scotchcast. Each CT study was performed immediately before or after every second or third actual treatment fraction without repositioning the patient between CT and treatment. The stereotactic localization system was mounted and the isocenter as initially located stereotactically was marked with fiducials for each CT study. Deviation of the treated isocenter as compared to the planned position was measured in all three dimensions. RESULTS: The immobilization device can be easily handled, attached to and removed from the stereotactic frame and thus enables treatment of multiple patients with the same stereotactic frame each day. Mean patient movements of 1.6 mm+/-1.2 mm (laterolateral [LL]), 1.4 mm+/-1.0 mm (anterior-posterior [AP]), 2.3 mm+/-1.3 mm (transversal vectorial error [VE]) and < slice thickness = 3 mm (craniocaudal [CC]) were recorded for the targets in the thoracic spine and 1.4 mm+/-1.0 mm (LL), 1.2 mm+/-0.7 mm (AP), 1.8 mm+/-1.2 mm (VE), and < 3 mm (CC) for the lumbar spine. The worst case deviation was 3.9 mm for the first patient with the target in the thoracic spine (in the LL direction). Combining those numbers (mean transversal VE for both locations and maximum CC error of 3 mm), the mean three-dimensional vectorial patient movement and thus the mean overall accuracy can be safely estimated to be < or = 3.6 mm. CONCLUSION: The presented combination of a body cast and head mask system in a rigid stereotactic body frame ensures reliable noninvasive patient fixation for fractionated extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy and may enable dose escalation for less radioresponsive tumors that are near the spinal cord or otherwise critically located while minimizing the risk of late sequelae.     

Fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy and single high-dose radiosurgery for acoustic neuroma: early results of a prospective clinical study

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess the local control and toxicity rate in acoustic neuroma patients treated with linear accelerator-based radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We evaluated 37 consecutive patients treated with stereotactic radiation therapy for acoustic neuroma. All patients had progressive tumors, progressive symptoms, or both. Mean tumor diameter was 2.3 cm (range 0.8-3.3) on magnetic resonance (MR) scan. Dentate patients were given a dose of 5x4 Gy or 5x5 Gy and edentate patients were given a dose of 1x10 Gy or 1x12.50 Gy prescribed to the 80% isodose. All patients were treated with a single isocenter. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up period of 25 months (range 12-61), the actuarial local control rate at 5 years was 91% (only 1 patient failed). The actuarial rate of hearing preservation at 5 years was 66% in previously-hearing patients. The actuarial rate of freedom from trigeminal nerve toxicity was 97% at 5 years. No patient developed facial nerve toxicity or other complications. CONCLUSION: In this unselected series, fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy and linear accelerator-based radiosurgery give excellent local control in acoustic neuroma. It combines a high rate of preservation of hearing with a very low rate of other toxicity, although follow-up is relatively short.     

Initial clinical experience with frameless stereotactic radiosurgery: analysis of accuracy and feasibility.

PURPOSE: To report on preliminary clinical experience with a novel image-guided frameless stereotactic radiosurgery system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen patients ranging in age from 14 to 81 received radiosurgery using a commercially available frameless stereotactic radiosurgery system. Pathologic diagnoses included metastases (12), recurrent primary intracranial sarcoma (1), recurrent central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (1), and medulloblastoma with supratentorial seeding (1). Treatment accuracy was assessed from image localization of the stereotactic reference array and reproducibility of biteplate reseating. We chose 0.3 mm vector translation error and 0.3 degree rotation about each axis as the maximum tolerated misalignment before treating each arc. RESULTS: The biteplates were found on average to reseat with a reproducibility of 0.24 mm. The mean registration error from CT localization was found to be 0.5 mm, which predicts that the average error at isocenter was 0.82 mm. No patient treatment was delivered beyond the maximum tolerated misalignment. The radiosurgery treatment was delivered in approximately 25 min per patient. CONCLUSION: Our initial clinical experience with stereotactic radiotherapy using the infrared camera guidance system was promising, demonstrating clinical feasibility and accuracy comparable to many frame-based systems.     

头颈肿瘤立体定向分次照射靶区定位的误差分析

背景与目的:明确靶区定位的精确度是立体定向分次照射质量保证的基本要求。本文主要分析头颈肿瘤立体定向分次照射(fractionatedstereotacticradiotherapy,FSRT)中机械等中心、CT定位、治疗摆位以及CT图像误差等可能引起的靶区定位误差。方法:使用立体定向治疗计划系统、靶点模拟器、头部定位框架检查各个治疗阶段靶区定位的误差。设置任意5个参考点,使用靶点模拟器检查CT定位误差;选取7个不同机器臂架/治疗床角度,定期用胶片检验使用的PhilipsSL-18直线加速器等中心误差大小;用验证片检查治疗摆位误差;对自制模体行CT扫描,分析CT图像伪影可能引起的图像误差。结果:CT定位误差约为(1.5±0.4)mm;在检查的不同机器臂架/治疗床角度中机械等中心最大误差为(1.0±0.6)mm;患者摆位的距离误差为(1.0±0.3)mm;整个治疗过程中靶区定位误差约为(2.1±0.8)mm。结论:立体定向分次照射中需要综合考虑各个阶段中可能对治疗靶区定位产生的影响,误差分析结果可用来确定治疗的计划靶区。     

Frame Slippage Verification in Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Purpose: To develop a method for detecting frame slippage in stereotactic radiosurgery by interactively matching in three dimensions Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRRs) to portal images.Methods and Materials: DRRs are superimposed over orthogonal edge-detected portal image pairs obtained prior to treatment. By interactively manipulating the CT data in three dimensions (rotations and translations) new DRRs are generated and overlaid with the orthogonal portal images. This method of matching is able to account for ambiguities due to rotations and translations outside of the imaging plane. The matching procedure is performed with anatomical structures, and is used in tandem with a fiducial marker array attached to the stereotactic frame. The method is evaluated using portal images simulated from patient CT data and then tested using a radiographic head phantom.Results: For simulation tests a mean radial alignment error of 0.82 mm was obtained with the 3D matching method compared to a mean error of 3.52 mm when using conventional matching techniques. For the head phantom tests the mean alignment displacement error for each of the stereotactic coordinates was found to be Δx = 0.95 mm, Δy = 1.06 mm, Δz = 0.99 mm, with a mean error radial of 1.94 mm (SD = 0.61 mm).Conclusion: Results indicate that the accuracy of the system is appropriate for stereotactic radiosurgery, and is therefore an effective tool for verification of frame slippage.     

Daily ultrasound-based image-guided targeting for radiotherapy of upper abdominal malignancies

PURPOSE: Development and implementation of a strategy to use a stereotactic ultrasound (US)-based image-guided targeting device (BAT) to align intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) target volumes accurately in the upper abdomen. Because the outlines of such targets may be poorly visualized by US, we present a method that uses adjacent vascular guidance structures as surrogates for the target position. We assessed the potential for improvement of daily repositioning and the feasibility of daily application. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 62 patients were treated by sequential tomotherapeutic IMRT between October 2000 and June 2003 for cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma (n = 10), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 10), liver metastases (n = 11), pancreatic carcinoma (n = 20), neuroblastoma (n = 3), and other abdominal and retroperitoneal tumors (n = 8). The target volumes (TVs) and organs at risk were delineated in contrast-enhanced CT data sets. Additionally, vascular guidance structures in close anatomic relation to the TV, or within the TV, were delineated. Throughout the course of IMRT, US BAT images were acquired during daily treatment positioning. In addition to the anatomic structures typically used for US targeting (e.g., the TV and dose-limiting organs at risk), CT contours of guidance structures were superimposed onto the real-time acquired axial and sagittal US images, and target position adjustments, as indicated by the system, were performed accordingly. We report the BAT-derived distribution of shifts in the three principal room axes compared with a skin-mark-based setup, as well as the time required to perform BAT alignment. The capability of the presented method to improve target alignment was assessed in 15 patients by comparing the organ and fiducial position between the respective treatment simulation CT with a control CT study after US targeting in the CT suite. RESULTS: A total of 1,337 BAT alignments were attempted. US images were not useful in 56 setups (4.2%), mainly because of limited visibility due to daily variations in colonic and gastric air. US imaging was facilitated in intrahepatic tumors and asthenic patients. The mean +/- SD shift from the skin mark position was 4.9 +/- 4.35, 6.0 +/- 5.31, and 6.0 +/- 6.7 mm in the x, y, and z direction, respectively. The mean magnitude vector of three-dimensional alignment correction was 11.4 +/- 7.6 mm. The proportion of daily alignments corrected by a magnitude of >10, >15, and >20 mm was 48.9%, 25.1%, and 12.7%, respectively. The magnitude of shifts in the principal directions, as well as the three-dimensional vector of displacement, was statistically significant (test against the zero hypothesis) at p <0.0001. The guidance structures that were the most valuable for identification of the TV position were the branches of the portal vein, hepatic artery, and dilated bile ducts in intrahepatic lesions and the aorta, celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, and extrahepatic aspects of the portal vein system in retroperitoneal and extrahepatic lesions. The mean total setup time was 4.6 min. The correlation of BAT targeting with target setup error assessment in the control CT scans in 15 patients revealed setup error reduction in 14 of 15 alignments. The average setup error reduction, assessed as a reduction in the length of setup error three-dimensional magnitude vector, was 54.4% +/- 26.9%, with an observed mean magnitude of residual setup error of 4.6 +/- 3.4 mm. The sole worsening of an initial setup was by a magnitude of <2 mm. US targeting resulted in statistically significant improvements in patient setup (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Daily US-guided BAT targeting for patients with upper abdominal tumors was feasible in the vast majority of attempted setups. This method of US-based image-guided tumor targeting has been successfully implemented in clinical routine. The observed improved daily repositioning accuracy might allow for individualized reduction of safety margins and optional dose escalation. Compared with the established application of the BAT device for prostate radiotherapy, in which the target can be directly visualized, the TV in the present study was predominantly positioned relative to guidance vascular structures in close anatomic relation. We perceived an enormous potential in improved and individualized patient positioning for fractionated radiotherapy and also for stereotactic extracranial radiotherapy and radiosurgery, especially for tumors of the liver and pancreas.     

Reliability of the bony anatomy in image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the position of brain metastases remains stable between planning and treatment in cranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen patients with 20 brain metastases were treated with single-fraction (17 lesions) or hypofractionated (3 lesions) image-guided SRT. Median time interval between planning and treatment was 8 days. Before treatment a cone-beam CT (CBCT) and a conventional CT after application of i.v. contrast were acquired. Setup errors using automatic bone registration (CBCT) and manual soft-tissue registration of the brain metastases (conventional CT) were compared. RESULTS: Tumor size was not significantly different between planning and treatment. The three-dimensional setup error (mean +/- SD) was 4.0 +/- 2.1 mm and 3.5 +/- 2.2 mm according to the bony anatomy and the lesion itself, respectively. A highly significant correlation between automatic bone match and soft-tissue registration was seen in all three directions (r >/= 0.88). The three-dimensional distance between the isocenter according to bone match and soft-tissue registration was 1.7 +/- 0.7 mm, maximum 2.8 mm. Treatment of intracranial pressure with steroids did not influence the position of the lesion relative to the bony anatomy. CONCLUSION: With a time interval of approximately 1 week between planning and treatment, the bony anatomy of the skull proved to be an excellent surrogate for the target position in image-guided SRT.     

IGRT对肺部恶性肿瘤精确放疗时摆位误差及摆位外扩边界值的影响

目的 探讨图像引导放疗(IGRT)在肺部恶性肿瘤中的应用价值.方法 回顾性分析44例肺部恶性肿瘤患者的临床资料,所有患者采用热塑体模固定,每天行IGRT,根据锥形束CT图像与计划CT图像相匹配,获得患者左右(x)、头脚(y)、前后(z)3个方向的线性误差和旋转误差,并对误差进行校正,分析校正前后摆位误差的变化.结果 校正后x、y、z轴上的平均摆位误差分别为(-0.02±0.20)、(0.04±0.21)、(-0.01±0.11)cm,均低于校正前,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05);校正前与校正后旋转x、y、z轴上的平均摆位误差比较,差异均无统计学意义(P﹥0.05);校正后x、y、z轴上的摆位外扩边界值(MPTV)分别较校正前减少2.80、7.16、4.78 mm.结论 IGRT可明显减小肺部恶性肿瘤患者放疗时的摆位误差,缩小MPTV,提高放疗的精确性.     

Geometric accuracy of field alignment in fractionated stereotactic conformal radiotherapy of brain tumors

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of field alignment in patients undergoing three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy of brain tumors, and to evaluate the impact on the definition of planning target volume and control procedures. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Geometric accuracy was analyzed in 20 patients undergoing fractionated stereotactic conformal radiotherapy for brain tumors. Rigid head fixation was achieved by using cast material. Transfer of stereotactic coordinates was performed by an external positioning device. The accuracy during treatment planning was quantitatively assessed by using repeated computed tomography (CT) examinations in treatment position (reproducibility of isocenter). Linear discrepancies were measured between treatment plan and CT examination. In addition, for each patient, a series of 20 verifications were taken in orthogonal projections. Linear discrepancies were measured between first and all subsequent verifications (accuracy during treatment delivery). RESULTS: For the total group of patients, the distribution of deviations during treatment setup showed mean values between -0.3-1.2 mm, with standard deviations (SD) of 1.3-2.0 mm. During treatment delivery, the distribution of deviations revealed mean values between 0.7-0.8 mm, with SDs of 0.5-0.6 mm, respectively. For all patients, deviations for the transition to the treatment machine were similar to deviations during subsequent treatment delivery, with 95% of all absolute deviations between less than 2.8 and 4.6 mm. CONCLUSION: Random fluctuations of field displacements during treatment planning and delivery prevail. Therefore, our quantitative data should be considered when prescribing the safety margins of the planning target volume. Repeated CT examination are useful to detect operator errors and large random or systematic deviations before start of treatment. Control procedures during treatment delivery appear to be of limited importance. In addition, our findings should help to determine "cut-off points" for corrective actions in stereotactic conformal radiotherapy of brain tumors.