Time to Cardioversion of Recurrent Atrial Arrhythmias After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Long‐Term Clinical Outcome

Introduction: It is unclear whether early restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial arrhythmias after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates reverse atrial remodeling and promotes long‐term maintenance of sinus rhythm. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the time to restoration of sinus rhythm after a recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia and long‐term maintenance of sinus rhythm after radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF. Methods and Results: Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed in 384 consecutive patients (age 60 ± 9 years) for paroxysmal (215 patients) or persistent AF (169 patients). Transthoracic cardioversion was performed in all 93 patients (24%) who presented with a persistent atrial arrhythmia: AF (n = 74) or atrial flutter (n = 19) at a mean of 51 ± 53 days from the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia and 88 ± 72 days from the ablation procedure. At a mean of 16 ± 10 months after the ablation procedure, 25 of 93 patients (27%) who underwent cardioversion were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy. Among the 46 patients who underwent cardioversion at ≤30 days after the recurrence, 23 (50%) were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy. On multivariate analysis of clinical variables, time to cardioversion within 30 days after the onset of atrial arrhythmia was the only independent predictor of maintenance of sinus rhythm in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy after a single ablation procedure (OR 22.5; 95% CI 4.87–103.88, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Freedom from AF/flutter is achieved in approximately 50% of patients who undergo cardioversion within 30 days of a persistent atrial arrhythmia after catheter ablation of AF.     

Right and Left Atrial Radiofrequency Catheter Therapy of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Introduction: (AF), trial fibrillation (AF), the most common arrhythmia, is due to multiple simultaneous wavelets of reentry in the atria. The only available curative treatment is surreal, using atriotomies to compartmentalize the atria. Therefore, we investigated a staged anatomical approach using radiofrequency catheter ablation lines to prevent paroxysmal AF. Methods and Results: Forty-live patients with frequent symptomatic drug-refractory episodes of paroxysmal AF were studied. Progressively complex linear lesions were created by sequential applications of radiofrequency current in the right atrium and then in the left atrium if required. The outcome of the procedure was considered a success when the episodes of AF were either eliminated or recurred at a rate of no more than one episode (lasting < 6 hours) in 3 months. Patients who had no more than one episode per month were considered “improved.” Right atrial ablation organized local electrical activity and led to stable sinus rhythm during the procedure in 18 (40%) of the 45 patients. However, sustained AF remained inducible in 40 of 45 patients, and the lesions failed to produce evidence of a significant linear conduction block/delay in all but four patients. There were no significant complications except for two transient sinus node dysfunctions. The procedure duration and fluoroscopic time were 248 ± 79 and 53 ± 11 min, respectively. Additional sessions were required in 19 patients to treat sustained right atrial flutter or arrhythmias linked to ectopic right or left atrial foci. During a mean follow-up of 11 ± 4 months, right atrial ablation was successful in 15 (33%) patients, ft without medication and 9 with a previously ineffective drug. Nine (20%) additional patients were improved. Ten patients with an unsuccessful outcome then underwent linear ablation in the left atrium. The procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were 292 ± 94 and 66 ± 24 min. A hemopericardium occurred in one patient. Two patients required reablation to treat ectopic atrial foci. Left atrial ablation terminated AF during the procedure in 8 patients, and sustained AF could not he induced in 5. Subsequent success was achieved in A (60%) patients, including 4 without medication, and 1 additional patient was improved. Conclusions: Successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of drug-refractory daily paroxysmal AF is feasible using linear atrial lesions complemented by focal ablation targeted at arrhythmogenic foci. Ablation only in the right atrium is a safe technique providing limited success, whereas linear lesions in the left atrium significantly increase the incidence of stable restoration of sinus rhythm, the inability to induce sustained AF, and the final success rate. The described technique is promising hut must he considered preliminary because significant Improvements are required to optimize lesion characteristics and shorten total procedure duration.     

Early versus Late Atrial Fibrillation after Atrial Flutter Ablation

Introduction: Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter (AFl) has high initial success with a 10–15% recurrence. Atrial fibrillation (AFib) after radiofrequency catheter ablation of AFl can occur but may be transient (lasting no more than four weeks). Methods: Of one hundred seventeen consecutive patients studied, one hundred and four consecutive patients with sustained, symptomatic AFl, as the predominant rhythm disturbance (some of whom had transient pre-ablation AFib), referred for radiofrequency catheter ablation, had clinical follow-up. All had evidence for successful AFl ablation. Patients were followed prospectively. Results: Over a mean follow-up of 28 months, 28 patients developed AFib after ablation of AFl [12 early AFib (<2 months) and 16 late AFib (>2 months)]. Seven of 12 (58%) patients in the early onset group reverted to normal sinus rhythm; none required long-term antiarrhythmic therapy. Only one (8%) developed permanent AFib. No patient in the late onset group remained in sinus rhythm without an antiarrhythmic drug. Three (19%) developed permanent AFib despite therapy among those with late onset AFib. Two (17%) patients with early onset AFib reverted to normal sinus rhythm with treatment versus 5 (31%) in the late onset group. Finally, only 2 patients (17%) with paroxysmal/persistent episodes of Afib from the early onset group stayed in normal sinus rhythm despite therapy, while 8 patients ( ± %) with paroxysmal/persistent AFib episodes from the late onset group required therapy to maintain normal sinus rhythm. Conclusion: Early onset AFib after ablation of AFl is likely to be transient and self-limited. Late onset AFib after ablation of AFl can persist and require chronic therapy.     

Catheter Ablation of Inducible Atrial Flutter, in Combination with Atrial Pacing and Antiarrhythmic Drugs (“Hybrid Therapy”) Improves Rhythm Control in Patients with Refractory Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial flutter or tachycardia may coexist with atrial fibrillation [AF] and can be treated with ablation techniques in attempt to reduce the total AF burden. The role of ablation of latent atrial tachyarrhythmias elicited at electrophysiologic study in conjunction with atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with refractory AF has not been evaluated. We evaluated the efficacy of catheter ablation of electrically induced atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia in improving rhythm control in patients with refractory AF. Methods: Consecutive patients with refractory AF, and spontaneous atrial flutter (Group 1) or without spontaneous atrial flutter (Group 2) underwent programmed stimulation in a baseline drug-free state. All patients had electrically induced atrial flutter or tachycardia. Radiofrequency ablation of the arrhythmia substrate was performed in all patients. Primary endpoints evaluated for patient outcome in both groups included maintenance of rhythm control and freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias. Results: Forty-three patients, with a mean age of 66±13 years were studied. Group 1 consisted of 22 patients while Group 2 had 21 patients. Ablation of the tricuspid valve-inferior venacaval isthmus was performed in 41 patients who had common atrial flutter induced at electrophysiologic study. Ablation of other atrial sites was performed in 8 patients with induced atypical flutter and 4 patients with induced atrial tachycardia. Ten of these patients had ablation of more than one arrhythmia. 17 patients (40%) had atrial pacing instituted and 28 patients remained on a class 1/3 antiarrhythmic drug. During a mean follow-up of 26±14 months, 33 patients (82.5%) remained in rhythm control. Actuarial analysis showed 96% of patients in rhythm control at 6 months, 94% at 12 months, and 90% at 24 months. Freedom from symptomatic AF recurrence was 64% at 6 months, 58% at 12 months, and 42% at 24 months. The outcome for both of these endpoints was similar for Group 1 and Group 2 (p = NS). The AF free interval increased significantly from 7±9 days to 172±121 days (p < 0.01) after ablation. This increase was again similar in both the groups. In the 14 patients were who did not receive atrial pacing and who remained on the same class 1/3 antiarrhythmic drug, the AF free interval increased from 18±17 days to 212±102 days (p < 0.01). Conclusions: We conclude that electrophysiologic studies can elicit latent atrial flutter or tachycardia in patients with refractory AF without spontaneous monomorphic atrial tachyarrhythmias. Catheter ablation of electrically induced atrial flutter or tachycardia either alone, or with atrial pacing and with antiarrhythmic drug may improve rhythm control and reduce AF recurrences. This is similar in patients with and without spontaneous atrial flutter and refractory AF.     

Importance of Sinus Rhythm as Endpoint of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Endpoint of Persistent AF Ablation . Background: The endpoint of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is still a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if sinus rhythm (SR) as endpoint of persistent AF ablation has a better long‐term outcome compared to atrial tachycardia (AT) or AF at the end of the procedure. Methods and Results: Between 2008 and 2011, 191 consecutive patients undergoing de novo catheter ablation for symptomatic persistent and long‐standing persistent AF using a sequential ablation approach (including pulmonary vein isolation, ablation of complex fractionated electrograms and linear lesions) were included in the study. According to the result at the end of ablation procedure, patients were classified into 3 groups: patients with termination of AF into SR (Group 1, n = 62), patients with AT undergoing cardioversion (CV) (Group 2, n = 47), or patients with AF undergoing CV (Group 3, n = 82). The primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months. At 12 months, estimated proportions of patients free from any arrhythmia recurrence were 42% for Group 1, 13% for Group 2, and 25% for Group 3 (P = 0.002). In a Cox regression analysis only termination into SR was associated with a lower risk of arrhythmia recurrence (HR: 0.62; P = 0.04). Conclusion: If SR is achieved as endpoint of persistent and long‐standing persistent AF ablation using a sequential ablation approach it is associated with the highest long‐term single procedure success rate compared to AT or AF at the end of the procedure. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 388‐395, April 2013)     

Outcomes of Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis

AF Ablation in HD Patients . Introduction: It is not common for patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) to undergo catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to show the outcomes of AF ablation in the HD patients. Methods and Results: Thirty HD patients who underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for drug refractory paroxysmal AF were retrospectively studied, and their AF recurrence free rate and frequency of periprocedural complications were compared to 60 age‐ and gender‐matched control patients not requiring HD. A nonirrigated ablation catheter was used in both patient groups. During a mean follow‐up period of 821 ± 218 days, 16 (54%) of the HD patients remained free from AF recurrence without any antiarrhythmic agents versus 47 (78%) of the control patients with an initial ablation (P = 0.013). A second ablation procedure was performed in 12 patients with an AF recurrence, and consequently 20 (67%) of the HD patients were in sinus rhythm compared to 53 (88%) of the controls during a follow‐up duration of 747 ± 221 after the last ablation (P = 0.012). Bleeding from the venipuncture site requiring a prolonged hospital stay was identified in 2 HD patients and 1 control subject, while no life‐threatening complications were observed in either patient group. Conclusion: Although the success rate of the PV isolation in HD patients was far from satisfactory, it may be considered as one of the therapeutic options for them. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 1289‐1294, December 2012)     

Intraprocedural Use of Ibutilide to Organize and Guide Ablation of Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrograms: Preliminary Assessment of a Modified Step‐Wise Approach to Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Ibutilide Guided CFAE Ablation. Introduction: While able to achieve clinical success, the current step‐wise approach to persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation requires considerable “substrate” ablation and frequently mandates multiple procedures to address consequent atrial tachycardias (ATs). An alternative strategy minimizing the amount of ablation while maintaining clinical success would be desirable. We hypothesize that intraprocedural administration of a low‐dose antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) during AF will organize areas of passive activation and not affect areas critical to AF maintenance, thereby potentially minimizing the ablation lesion set. Methods and Results: Eleven patients (age = 55 ± 6 years; LA = 48 ± 15 mm; median AF duration = 3 years) with persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation were enrolled in this exploratory prospective observational study. After pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, a mean cycle length (mCL) map was created and areas with mCL <120 ms were considered to represent complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE). Ibutilide (0.25–1.0 mg) was then administered and a second mCL map created. Ablation lesions were placed at CAFE sites identified after ibutilide administration. Activation and/or entrainment mapping was employed to address ATs. The endpoint of ablation was achieving sinus rhythm. The average LA mCL increased (146 vs 165 ms, P = 0.01) and the LA CFAE surface area decreased after ibutilide administration. Additional ablation organized AF to either sinus rhythm or AT in 10/11 (91%) patients. After a median follow up of 455 days, 8 of 11 (72%) patients were free from AF. Three patients underwent a repeat ablation procedure (average 1.27 ablations/patient). Conclusions: Ibutilide administration may organize atrial activity and facilitate AF termination during ablation while minimizing the ablation lesion set. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 608‐616, June 2010)     

Incidence and Electrophysiologic Properties of Dissociated Pulmonary Vein Activity Following Pulmonary Vein Isolation During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Dissociated PV Activity During AF Ablation. Introduction: Pulmonary veins (PV) play an important role in the arrhythmogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF). Catheter‐based PV isolation is one of the primary treatments for symptomatic drug refractory AF. Following electrical isolation, isolated rhythms in the PV are encountered. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of postisolation PV activity and classify the different rhythms observed. Methods and Results: This single center prospective study sought to assess the dissociated activity in the PVs following their isolation during AF ablation. In 100 consecutive patients (60 paroxysmal, 40 persistent) undergoing AF ablation, dissociated PV activity was recorded using a multielectrode mapping catheter following antral PV isolation. The dissociated PV activity was classified as (1) silent, (2) isolated ectopic beats, (3) ectopic rhythm, and (4) PV fibrillation. All the PVs were successfully isolated in all the patients. In 91 of 100 patients, there was dissociated activity in at least 1 isolated ipsilateral PV group. There was no significant difference in spontaneous PV activity between patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF (91.7% vs 90%, P = 1.0). Among the 200 isolated ipsilateral PV groups, 64 of 200 (32%) were silent, 86 of 200 (43%) demonstrated isolated ectopic beats, 41 of 200 (20.5%) had ectopic rhythms and 9 of 200 (4.5%) had PV fibrillation. The average cycle length of the PV ectopic rhythm was 2594 ± 966 ms (range 1193–4750 ms). Conclusions: Following PV isolation, a majority of patients demonstrate dissociated activity in at least 1 PV. This finding was evident in patients with both paroxysmal and persistent AF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1338‐1343, December 2010)     

Catheter Ablation of Long‐Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Lesson from Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Catheter Ablation of Long‐Standing Persistent AF. Introduction: Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) is associated with a high success rate in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in patients with long‐standing persistent AF, the ideal ablation strategy still remains a matter of debate. Methods and Results: Two‐hundred and five patients underwent catheter ablation for long‐standing persistent AF defined as continuous AF of more than 1‐year duration. In a first step, all patients underwent CPVI. If direct‐current cardioversion failed following CPVI, ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) was performed. The goal was conversion into sinus rhythm (SR) or, alternatively, atrial tachycardia (AT) with subsequent ablation. A total of 340 procedures were performed. CPVI alone was performed during 165 procedures in 124 of 205 (60.5%) patients. In the remaining 81 patients, additional CFAE ablation was performed in 45, left linear lesions for recurrent ATs in 44 and SVC isolation in 15 patients, respectively, resulting in inadvertent left atrial appendage isolation in 9 (4.4%) patients. After the initial ablation procedure, 67 of 199 patients remained in SR during a mean follow‐up of 19 ± 11 months. Six patients were lost to follow‐up. After a mean of 1.7 ± 0.8 procedures, 135 of 199 patients (67.8%) remained in SR. Eighty‐six patients (43.2%) remained in SR following CPVI performed as the sole ablative strategy. Conclusions: CPVI alone is sufficient to restore SR in 43.2% of patients with long‐standing persistent AF. Multiple procedures and additional ablation strategies with a significant risk of inadvertent left atrial appendage isolation are often required to maintain stable SR. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1085‐1093)     

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Unusual Mechanisms of Atrial Fibrillation:

RF Catheter Ablation in AF. Introduction: The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of localized mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF).
Methods and Results: Three patients underwent RF catheter ablation for drug-resistant atrial arrhythmias. The first two patients had either incessant atrial tachycardia or AF. In the first patient, the KCG pattern of AF was mimicked by a very rapid atrial focus, whereas in the second patient, AF was due to true degeneration of the atrial activity triggered by atrial tachycardia. In both patients, the ablation of atrial focus led to the clinical disappearance of AF. The third patient had frequent episodes of AF, which lasted several days or weeks, and two documented episodes of atrial flutter. Mapping during AF showed an irregular atrial rhythm in the atrial septum, particularly in the region surrounding the coronary sinus, whereas the entire lateral right atrial free wall exhibited a constantly organized rhythm. RF energy was applied between the tricuspid ring and both the inferior vena cava and the coronary sinus, resulting in inability to reinduceatrial flutter or sustained AF. A 6-month follow-up in this patient showed the disappearance of prolonged episodes of AF.
Conclusion: The observations indicate that AF may be linked to "focal" mechanisms that can be treated by RF catheter ablation.     

Linear Ablation of Right Atrial Free Wall Flutter: Demonstration of Bidirectional Conduction Block as an Endpoint Associated With Long‐Term Success

Ablation of Right Atrial Free Wall Flutter. Introduction: Ablation for atypical atrial flutter (AFL) is often performed during tachycardia, with termination or noninducibility of AFL as the endpoint. Termination alone is, however, an inadequate endpoint for typical AFL ablation, where incomplete isthmus block leads to high recurrence rates. We assessed conduction block across a low lateral right atrial (RA) ablation line (LRA) from free wall scar to the inferior vena cava (IVC) or tricuspid annulus in 11 consecutive patients with atypical RA free wall flutter. Method and results: LRA block was assessed following termination of AFL, by pacing from the ablation catheter in the low lateral RA posterior to the ablation line and recording the sequence and timing of activation anterior to the line with a duodecapole catheter, and vice versa for bidirectional block. LRA block resulted in a high to low activation pattern on the halo and a mean conduction time of 201 ± 48 ms to distal halo. LRA conduction block was present in only 2 out of 6 patients after termination of AFL by ablation. Ablation was performed during sinus rhythm (SR) in 9 patients to achieve LRA conduction block. No recurrence of AFL was observed at long‐term follow‐up (22 ± 12 months); 3 patients developed AF. Conclusion: Termination of right free wall flutter is often associated with persistent LRA conduction and additional radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in SR is usually required. Low RA pacing may be used to assess LRA conduction block and offers a robust endpoint for atypical RA free wall flutter ablation, which results in a high long‐term cure rate. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 526‐531, May 2010)     

Atrial Tachycardia Confined Within the Left Atrial Appendage

AT Confined Within the LAA. Left atrial tachycardias are often seen following catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). We report here an unusual case where AF was converted to sinus rhythm following catheter ablation, but ongoing atrial tachycardia confined within the left atrial appendage (LAA) was observed. Although the LAA tachycardia was dissociated from the atrium in sinus rhythm, bidirectional conduction between the left atrium and the LAA was, however, demonstrated after tachycardia termination. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 933‐935, August 2010)     

Hybrid Therapy with Right Atrial Catheter Ablation and Previously Ineffective Antiarrhythmic Drugs for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Many patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) become refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Early studies suggested that linear catheter ablation in the right atrium may provide sufficient substrate modification to reestablish therapeutic efficacy of previously ineffective AADs.Methods: This prospective before-after multicenter trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of hybrid therapy that included right atrial catheter ablation coupled with a regimen of previously ineffective AADs on AF episode frequency and symptoms in drug refractory patients with paroxysmal AF. A standard linear lesion set (lateral, septal, isthmus) was used in all subjects. AF episode frequency, clinical arrhythmia symptoms, condition-specific (AFSS) and global health-related quality of life (SF-36) were assessed prior to ablation and at 6 months.Results: Ninety-three subjects, refractory to an average 2.9 AADs at baseline, qualified for inclusion and underwent right atrial catheter ablation. Eighty-four subjects (90%) provided 6 month AF episode frequency data which demonstrated a significant decrease compared to baseline (3.4 vs. 9.5, p < 0.0001). Forty-nine subjects (58%) were considered a clinical success by virtue of achieving a pre-specified target level episode frequency reduction of 50% or greater. Substantial and statistically significant improvements were realized almost uniformly for all measured arrhythmia symptoms as well as for both quality of life measures. The incidence of major complications was 5.4%.Conclusions: The addition of right atrial catheter ablation to a regimen of previously ineffective AADs is associated with a significant reduction in the frequency, duration and severity of AF episodes and symptoms.     

Clinical Value of Noninducibility by High-Dose Isoproterenol Versus Rapid Atrial Pacing After Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Noninducibility by High‐Dose Isoproterenol. Objective: To determine the relative clinical value of noninducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) by isoproterenol (ISO) and by rapid atrial pacing (RAP) in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF). Background: AF can be induced by RAP or ISO in >85% of patients with PAF. Methods: ISO was administered in escalating doses of 5, 10, 15, and 20 μg/min in 112 patients (age = 56 ± 13 years) with PAF before radiofrequency catheter ablation. AF was inducible in 97 of 112 patients (87%) at a mean dose of 15 ± 5 μg/min. RAP induced AF in the remaining 14 of 15 patients. Antral pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (APVI) was followed by ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) as necessary to terminate AF and render AF noninducible in response to ISO. Results: AF terminated during APVI in 72 of 111 patients (65%) and after APVI plus ablation of CFAEs in 11 of 111 patients (10%). In the remaining 28 patients (25%), sinus rhythm was restored by transthoracic cardioversion. RAP was performed in the last 61 consecutive patients who were rendered noninducible by ISO. RAP initiated AF in 20 of 61 patients (33%) and atrial flutter in 6 patients (10%). No additional ablation was performed if AF was induced with RAP; however, atrial flutter was targeted. At 12 ± 5 months, 63/75 patients (84%) who were noninducible by ISO and 2 of 8 (25%) who still were reinducible by ISO were free from recurrent AF after a single ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs (P = 0.001). AF recurred in 20 of 36 patients (56%) who required cardioversion for persistent AF after ablation (P < 0.001). Among the 61 patients who also underwent RAP, 12 of 20 (60%) who were, and 31 of 41 (76%) who were not inducible by RAP were free from recurrent AF (P = 0.21). The accuracy of noninducibility as a predictor of clinical outcome was 83% with ISO and 64% by RAP (P = 0.03). Conclusions: The response to isoproterenol after catheter ablation of PAF more accurately predicts clinical outcome than the response to RAP. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 13–20, January 2010)     

Initial results of efficacy of left linear ablation using a novel simultaneous multielectrode ablation catheter

LA Linear Ablation With Multielectrode Catheter. Introduction: Creating complete linear block with point‐by‐point ablation is challenging in the left atrium (LA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of LA linear ablation using a hexapolar linear multielectrode mapping/ablation catheter. Methods and Results: Seventeen patients (age 57 ± 10, 14 male, 6 paroxysmal AF (PAF)) were studied and underwent linear ablation at the mitral isthmus (MI) and LA roof. Ablation was performed with 90 second, 60 °C applications of duty‐cycled bipolar/unipolar radiofrequency in a 1:1 ratio simultaneously at all selected electrode pairs. The result could not be evaluated in 2 patients because AF persisted despite cardioversion. Roof line block was confirmed in 9 of 15 (60%) patients. The mean number of applications and the procedural time with and without block was 5.4 ± 2.4 and 4.5 ± 2.2 applications, and 15 ± 8 and 13 ± 7 minutes. MI block was confirmed in 4 of 15 (27%) patients. The mean number of RF applications with and without block was 5.3 ± 2.2 and 9.9 ± 4.4 applications, and the procedural time was 20 ± 9 and 27 ± 10 minutes, respectively. For patients with underlying persistent AF, power was lower than those with PAF but improved when ablation was performed in sinus rhythm. Char was observed in 2 cases; however, no procedure‐related complications were observed. Conclusions: In our initial experience, a linear multielectrode catheter using duty‐cycled bipolar and unipolar RF energy was inferior to conventional single point irrigated ablation in achieving LA linear block. However, successful linear block was obtained within a short period of time, when it was achieved . (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 739‐745, July 2011)     

Ablation of atrial fibrillation: Patient selection, technique, and outcome

Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has expanded from its limited application for patients with paroxysmal AF and structurally normal hearts to patients with persistent arrhythmia and more extensive structural heart disease. The cornerstone of this procedure involves pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, which is achieved by encircling lesions around the PVs. Success rates are highest for patients with paroxysmal AF, but modification of the technique to include linear lesions in the left atrium and targeting complex electrograms has improved outcomes in patients with long-lasting AF. The procedure remains complex, and the risk of complications must be balanced against the perceived benefit of maintaining sinus rhythm. For this reason, AF ablation is indicated in symptomatic patients who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug. Current studies will address catheter ablation’s role as first-line therapy for patients with AF.     

Effectiveness of rhythm control in persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation with overdrive atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drugs after linear right atrial catheter ablation

Right atrial (RA) maze procedures using linear catheter ablation have had limited efficacy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that "hybrid" therapy using overdrive atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drugs can improve efficacy of catheter RA maze and expand its role to persistent or permanent AF. Catheter RA maze procedures were performed in 26 patients with persistent or permanent AF refractory to 4.5 +/- 2.1 antiarrhythmic drugs. Overdrive dual-site RA pacing (21 patients) or high RA pacing (5 patients) was continued (n = 11) or instituted periablation (n = 15). All patients continued receiving previously ineffective antiarrhythmic drugs. Freedom from permanent AF (rhythm control), symptomatic and/or asymptomatic AF recurrences, the safety of hybrid therapy, and overall survival were assessed. There was no procedure-related mortality or stroke. Rhythm control was achieved in 24 patients (92%) within 3 months. During long-term follow-up (6 to 49 months, mean 17 +/- 10), rhythm control was maintained in 20 patients (77%). Nine patients (35%) had no AF recurrences, whereas 11 patients maintained rhythm control with infrequent AF recurrences. Device datalogs at the study cut-off point demonstrated no AF events in 6 patients, nonsustained atrial tachycardia in 2 patients, and brief asymptomatic paroxysmal AF in 12 patients. Actuarial patient survival was 95% at 1 year and 74% at 2 years of follow-up. Thus, hybrid therapy utilizing catheter RA maze procedures with overdrive atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drugs can be performed safely and can reestablish rhythm control in selected patients with refractory persistent or permanent AF.     

Characteristics and outcome in patients receiving multiple (more than two) catheter ablation procedures for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Background: The features of multiple catheter ablation procedures for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) are unknown. We aimed to investigate the electrophysiologic characteristics and the clinical outcomes in the patients with AF who received more than two ablation procedures.
Methods: The study consisted of 15 consecutive patients (age 48 ± 14 years, 10 males) who had undergone three to five (3.3 ± 0.6) catheter ablation procedures for recurrent paroxysmal AF.
Results: Ten patients had pulmonary vein (PV)-AF and one had AF originating from both PVs and the superior vena cava (SVC) in the first ablation procedure. All of them exhibited PV reconnection during the recurrent episodes. Four of the 15 patients had AF originating from non-PV foci (three from the SVC, one from the crista terminalis) in the first procedure, and two had AF recurrences due to recovered conduction from the SVC. In all patients with PV-AF recurrences, repeated PV isolation procedures could effectively eliminate the AF. The incidence of the need for additional LA linear ablation lesions was higher comparing between the first procedure and in the following ablation procedures (18% vs. 71%, P = 0.02). During a follow-up of 1.7 ± 1.1 years, 73% of the patients remained in sinus rhythm without any antiarrhythmic drugs after the final procedure.
Conclusions: Recovered PV connection was the major cause of the AF recurrences despite undergoing multiple catheter ablation procedures. It is advisable to inspect all PVs during the AF recurrence. Repeated PV isolation plus left atrial linear ablations could effectively eliminate the AF with satisfactory outcomes.     

Pulmonary Vein Antral Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Results from Long‐Term Follow‐Up

Long‐Term Follow‐Up After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation . Introduction: Pulmonary veins play an important role in triggering atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for patients with paroxysmal AF. However, the late AF recurrence rate in long‐term follow‐up of circumferential PV antral isolation (PVAI) is not well documented. We sought to determine the time to recurrence of arrhythmia after PVAI, and long‐term rates of sinus rhythm after circumferential PVAI. Methods: One hundred consecutive patients with a mean age of 54 ± 10 years, with paroxysmal AF who underwent PVAI procedure were analyzed. Isolation of pulmonary veins was based on an electrophysiological and anatomical approach, with a nonfluoroscopic navigation mapping system to guide antral PVI. Ablation endpoint was vein isolation confirmed with a circular mapping catheter at first and subsequent procedures. Clinical, ECG, and Holter follow‐up was undertaken every 3 months in the first year postablation, every 6 months thereafter, with additional prolonged monitoring if symptoms were reported. Time to arrhythmia recurrence, and representing arrhythmias, were documented. Results: Isolation of all 4 veins was successful in 97% patients with 3.9 ± 0.3 veins isolated/patient. Follow‐up after the last RF procedure was at a mean of 39 ± 10 months (range 21–66 months). After a single procedure, sinus rhythm was maintained at long‐term follow‐up in 49% patients without use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). After repeat procedure, sinus rhythm was maintained in 57% patients without the use of AADs, and in 82% patients including patients with AADs. A total of 18 of 100 patients had 2 procedures and 4 of 100 patients had 3 procedures for recurrent AF/AT. Most (86%) AF/AT recurrences occurred ≤1 year after the first procedure. Mean time to recurrence was 6 ± 10 months. Kaplan–Meier analysis on antiarrhythmics showed AF free rate of 87% at 1 year and 80% at 4 years. There were no major complications. Conclusion: PVAI is an effective strategy for the prevention of AF in the majority of patients with PAF. Maintenance of SR requires repeat procedure or continuation of AADs in a significant proportion of patients. After maintenance of sinus rhythm 1‐year post‐PVAI, a minority of patients will subsequently develop late recurrence of AF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 137‐141, February 2011)     

Concealed Automaticity From an Island of Atrial Myocardium Post Cavotricuspid Ablation

Island of Atrial Myocardium Post Cavotricuspid Ablation. We report the case of a patient with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in whom 2 previous cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablations were performed for recurrent type I counterclockwise atrial flutter. One year after the last CTI ablation, the patient underwent pulmonary vein isolation for AF and reassessment of conduction block in the CTI was performed during the procedure. While mapping the CTI, activations were documented within the CTI that were dissociated from both right atrial and ventricular activity during sinus rhythm and pacing maneuvers. This dissociated activity was confined to a region delimited by the 2 previous ablation lines, the tricuspid annulus and the inferior vena cava. These findings suggest that an island of atrial myocardium with automatic activity was created within the CTI by previous ablation lines. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1408‐1409, December 2010)