Bronchodilator responsiveness and atopy in 5-10-yr-old coughers.

Cough-variant asthma is considered by some to be an asthma phenotype. Bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) is an undisputed feature of asthma. Of school-aged wheezers, 90% are atopic. Are school-aged coughers who demonstrate BDR also atopic? If so, then it would be reasonable to reserve the diagnosis cough-variant asthma for this particular group. Airway resistance was measured by the interrupter technique (Rint) before and after salbutamol in controls (n=73), coughers (n=63) and previous wheezers (n=63) aged 5-10 yrs. Immunoglobulin (Ig)-E was measured in coughers and wheezers. BDR was expressed as the ratio baseline:post-salbutamol Rint. Groups were of similar age (mean 6.7, range 5-9.9 yrs). Geometric mean baseline Rint was similar in controls and coughers (0.66 and 0.68 kPa x L(-1) x s), but the baseline Rint for wheezers (0.73 kPa x L(-1) s) was greater than that for controls (p=0.05) but not significantly different from coughers (p=0.17). Geometric mean BDR in coughers was 1.22, controls 1.13 and wheezers 1.30 (p=0.01 for coughers and controls; p=0.08 for coughers and wheezers; p<0.001 for controls and wheezers). IgE was lower in coughers than wheezers (geometric means 36 and 364 International Units (IU) x L(-1), p<0.001) and was unrelated to BDR in both groups. In summary, atopy, and not bronchodilator responsiveness, distinguishes groups of coughers from groups of wheezers. A diagnosis of cough-variant asthma cannot be reserved for even those school-aged coughers, who demonstrate bronchodilator responsiveness.     

Interrupter resistance short-term repeatability and bronchodilator response in preschool children

Interrupter resistance (Rint) technique can be easily and successfully performed in preschool children. The establishment of Rint short-term repeatability is essential to interpret any Rint change after a pharmacological intervention. AIMS OF THE STUDY: In preschool children with asthma or chronic cough: (1) to assess two indices of short-term repeatability: (a) intra-measurement and (b) within-occasion between-test repeatability; (2) to study the relationship between short-term repeatability and bronchodilator response (BDR). RESULTS: Rint intra-measurement repeatability assessed by the coefficient of variation was similar at baseline and after bronchodilator in asthmatics and in coughers (median 10% and 12%, respectively). There was no significant difference between asthmatics and coughers for both coefficient of repeatability (CR) (0.25 kPa L(-1)s and 32% of predicted vs 0.16 kPa L(-1) s and 21% of predicted, respectively) and BDR (median -14.7% vs -21.1% of predicted, respectively). However, in 20% of the study children, baseline variability of Rint modified the significance of the BDR. CONCLUSION: In the present study, Rint short-term repeatability was similar to that of previous studies. Similar Rint repeatability in coughers and in asthmatic children favored the use of asthmatic CR for both populations, and a -35% cut-off as a positive BDR. In 20% of study children, baseline Rint variability could influence the significance of the BDR. In order to improve assessment of BDR using Rint, further studies are needed (1) to compare the variability of Rint to other resistance measurement techniques and (2) to define the best method for Rint calculation and for expression of BDR.     

Interrupter resistance in preschool children: measurement characteristics and reference values

There is a need for quick, reliable, and noninvasive lung function tests to assess airway obstruction in preschool children both for pediatric pulmonary care as well as for research purposes. We studied feasibility, reproducibility, and validity of measurements of the respiratory system using the interrupter technique (interrupter resistance [Rint]) and obtained reference values in children from a general population, 2 to 7 yr of age. Accuracy was studied by comparisons of Rint with plethysmographic airway resistance (Raw) in 20 patients (7 to 14 yr) with mild to severe chronic airways obstruction and was satisfactory in patients with FEV(1) > 60% predicted. The technique proved sensitive enough to detect changes in airway caliber within a small group of 12 children who developed mild respiratory tract infections. Among children from a general population, subgroups with mild respiratory symptoms or mild respiratory disease had higher mean Rint values. Airway obstruction was better detected using expiratory rather than inspiratory interruptions, both programmed at peak tidal ventilatory flow. Reproducibility within subjects was satisfactory (intraclass correlation 0.82 and 0.79). The same applied to interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation 0.98). The interrupter technique proves to be a reliable and practical test of airway function, suitable for clinical and epidemiologic studies in preschool children.     

Measurement of airway resistance using the interrupter technique in preschool children in the ambulatory setting.

This study describes the feasibility, repeatability, and interrater reliability of the measurement of airway resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint) in children 2-5 yrs of age, and examines whether reversibility to bronchodilator can be demonstrated in wheezy children. The mean of six Rint values was taken as a measurement. If subjects could complete one measurement and then a second 15 min after bronchodilator, baseline testing and reversibility testing were considered feasible. To measure repeatability, two measurements 30 s apart and measurements before and 15 min after placebo bronchodilator were compared. Measurements by two testers were compared for interrater reliability. Change in Rint in wheezy children was measured after bronchodilator. Fifty-six per cent of 2-3-yr-olds (n=79), 81% of 3-4-yr-olds (n=104) and 95% of 4-5-yr-olds (n=88) completed baseline testing, and 53%, 71% and 91% completed reversibility testing. Baseline measurements were 0.47-2.56 kPa x L(-1) x s. Repeatabilities (2 SD of the mean differences between measurements) at 30 s in the three age bands were 0.21, 0.17 and 0.15 kPa x L(-1) x s and 0.19 kPa x L(-1) x s after placebo. Using 0.21 kPa x L(-1) x s as the threshold for reversibility, reversibility was demonstrated in most wheezy children. Interrater reliability was 0.15 kPa x L(-1) x s. Preschool children can undertake measurements of airway resistance by the interrupter technique in ambulatory settings and reversibility to bronchodilator in wheezy children can be demonstrated. This technique promises to be a useful clinical and research tool.     

Can bronchodilator response predict bronchial response to methacholine in preschool coughers?

The aim of the present study was to determine the relationship between bronchodilator response, assessed by interrupter resistance (Rint), and bronchial reactivity in preschool children with chronic cough. Thirty-eight children coughers (median age 5.0 years, range 2.8-6.4) were tested. Bronchodilator response was recorded within 4 months before methacholine challenge. Response to the latter was assessed using transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen and Rint. Children were considered responders if a 20% fall in transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen occurred during the bronchial challenge. Bronchodilator response was not different between responders (n = 24) and nonresponders (n = 14) [median (range) -0.11 (-0.44-0.09) vs. -0.08 (-0.21-0.10) kPa L(-1) sec; respectively]. However, none of the nonresponders had a bronchodilator response larger than -0.21 kPa L(-1) sec, this cutoff had a 100% positive and a 44% negative predictive value to predict a positive methacholine challenge. The relationship between bronchodilator response and bronchial methacholine responsiveness reached the limit of significance (P = 0.048). Furthermore, the magnitude of the bronchodilator response was correlated to the level of methacholine-induced level of bronchoconstriction (P = 0.01), and to the postchallenge bronchodilation (P = 0.04), all values expressed as % predicted. Moreover, the postbronchodilator Rint value obtained with preceding methacholine challenge was lower than the postbronchodilator value without preceding methacholine challenge in 71.4% (10/14) of the nonresponders and in only 33.3% (8/24) of the responders. Conclusions in preschool coughers bronchodilator response, assessed by the interrupter technique, was correlated to the bronchial responsiveness to methacholine. Non responders had a bronchodilator response not larger than -0.21 kPa L(-1) sec.     

Pulmonary function tests in preschool children with asthma

Pulmonary function tests are seldom performed in preschool children with asthma. The aim of this multicenter study was to compare pulmonary function in 74 preschool children with asthma (height of 90-130 cm) and 84 healthy control subjects. Functional residual capacity (helium dilution technique) and expiratory interrupter resistance (interrupter technique) were measured. As compared with control children, children with asthma had a significantly higher resistance (0.77 +/- 0.20 vs. 0.92 +/- 0.22 kPa. L-1. second, p < 0.001) and significantly lower specific expiratory interrupter conductance (p < 0.005) values. Resistance values were significantly higher in children with asthma with than without symptoms on exertion (p < 0.05). The effect of bronchodilator administration, expressed as the percentage of baseline and predicted resistance values, was significantly greater in children with asthma than in control subjects (-18.6 +/- 13.6% vs. -11.2 +/- 15.2%, p 相似文献   

Comparison of the forced oscillation technique and the interrupter technique for assessing airway obstruction and its reversibility in children

The forced oscillation technique (FOT) and interrupter technique are particularly attractive for pediatric use as they require only passive cooperation from the patient. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of these methods for detecting airway obstruction and its reversibility in 118 children (3-16 yr) with asthma or chronic nocturnal cough. FOT (R(0) and R(16)) and interruption (Rint) parameters were measured at baseline and after bronchodilator inhalation (n = 94). Rint was significantly lower than R(0), especially in children with high baseline values. Baseline parameters were normalized for height and weight [R(SD)]. In children able to perform forced expiratory maneuvers (n = 93), the best discrimination between those with baseline FEV(1) < 80% or > or = 80% of predicted values was obtained with R(0)(SD). At a specificity of 80%, R(0)(SD) yielded 66% sensitivity, whereas Rint(SD) yielded only 33% sensitivity. Similarly, postbronchodilator changes in R(0)(SD) [DeltaR(0)(SD)] yielded the best discrimination between children with and without significant reversibility in FEV(1). At a specificity of 80%, DeltaR(0)(SD) yielded 67% sensitivity and DeltaRint(SD) yielded 58% sensitivity. In children unable to perform forced expiratory maneuvers (n = 25), FOT, contrary to the interrupter technique, clearly identified a subgroup of young children with high resistance values at baseline, which returned to normal after bronchodilation. We conclude that, in asthmatic children over 3 yr old, FOT measurements provide a more reliable evaluation of bronchial obstruction and its reversibility compared with the interrupter technique, especially in young children with high baseline values.     

Airway resistance measured by the interrupter technique: expiration or inspiration, mean or median?

The measurement of airway resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint) needs standardization. Should measurements be made be during the expiratory or inspiratory phase of tidal breathing? In reported studies, the measurement of Rint has been calculated as the median or mean of a small number of values, is there an important difference? Subjects were 2.5-5.0 yrs (median 4.0 yrs) who had previous respiratory symptoms. The Rint in expiration (RintE) and inspiration (RintI) pre and postsalbutamol, the coefficient of variation (CV) of values contributing to measurements, and bronchodilator responsiveness(BDR) in both phases were compared. Measurements using median and mean were compared. RintE was higher than RintI by 4% (p < 0.01). The CV of values making up RintE and RintI, and BDR measured in expiration and inspiration were similar. The median difference between means and medians of values making up measurements was 0.6% (range -6-11%). RintE has been shown to be consistently greater then RintI but the difference in this study is small. It is suggested that one or the other is chosen as the standard. In the present data the mean of a set of values contributing to a measurement was not significantly different from the median. However, the use of the median has been recommended since it is less affected by possible outlying values such as might be included by fully automated equipment.     

Measurement of lung function in awake 2–4-year-old asthmatic children during methacholine challenge and acute asthma: A comparison of the impulse oscillation technique,the interrupter technique,and transcutaneous measurement of oxygen versus whole-body plethysmography

This study evaluated three techniques for testing of lung function in young awake children. We compared measurements by the forced or impulse oscillation technique (IOS), the interrupter technique (IT), and transcutaneous measurements of oxygen (tcPO₂) with concomitant measurements of specific airway resistance (sRaw) during methacholine challenge in 20 stable asthmatic children, 2–4 years old. Measurements were performed with all techniques after each dose of methacholine and after inhalation of a bronchodilator. Measurements were carried out during tidal breathing using a face-mask with a built-in mouthpiece. The ranking of sensitivity was as follows: sRaw > IOS, respiratory reactance at 5 Hz (Xrs5) > tcPO₂ > interrupter resistance (Rint) > IOS, respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (Rrs5). The sensitivity of sRaw and Xrs5 was not significantly different, but both were significantly more sensitive than Rint and Rrs5; the sensitivity of tcPO₂, Rint, and Rrs5 was not significantly different. Measurements in eight of the subjects performed during an episode of acute asthma yielded comparable results in regard to the sensitivity of the techniques. Measurements improved significantly after bronchodilator administration; however, the response to bronchodilator tended to be less during acute asthma and was best demonstrated by a deterioration of tcPO₂. All the evaluated techniques reliably reflect short-term changes in respiratory function and can provide clinically useful estimates of airway function. The techniques are non-invasive, are not dependent on the active co-operation or sedation of the subjects, and therefore are well suited for routine use in young children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996; 21:290–300. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Pulmonary function tests in preschool children with cystic fibrosis

Pulmonary function tests have rarely been assessed in preschool children with cystic fibrosis (CF). The objective of this multicenter study was to compare pulmonary function in 39 preschool children with CF (height, 90-130 cm; 16 homozygous Delta F508) and in 79 healthy control children. Functional residual capacity (helium dilution technique) and expiratory interrupter resistance (Rint(exp)) (interrupter technique) were measured. As compared with control children, children with CF had significantly higher Rint(exp), expressed as absolute values and as Z-scores (1.05 +/- 0.36 versus 0.80 +/- 0.20 kPa.L(-1). second, p < 0.0001; and 1.31 +/- 1.72 versus 0.19 +/- 0.97, p < 0.0001), and significantly lower specific expiratory interrupter conductance (1.29 +/- 0.34 versus 1.63 +/- 0.43 kPa(-1). second, p < 0.0001). The effect of the bronchodilator salbutamol on Rint(exp) was not significantly different between children with CF and control children. Rint(exp) Z-scores were significantly higher in children with CF who were exposed to passive smoke (n = 8) (p < 0.03). Children with CF and with a history of respiratory symptoms (n = 31) had significantly higher functional residual capacity Z-scores (p < 0.02) and lower specific expiratory interrupter conductance Z-scores (p < 0.04). Genotype did not influence the data. We conclude that Rint(exp) and functional residual capacity measurements may help to follow young children with CF who are unable to perform reproducible forced expiratory maneuvers.     

Discriminative capacity of bronchodilator response measured with three different lung function techniques in asthmatic and healthy children aged 2 to 5 years

The primary aim of this study was to quantify and compare bronchodilator responsiveness in healthy and asthmatic children aged 2 to 5 yr. The secondary aim of the study was to compare discriminative capacity (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the reversibility test for the diagnosis of asthma) for each of the lung function tests applied in the study. Specific airway resistance (sRaw) as measured by whole-body plethysmography, respiratory resistance as measured with the interrupter technique (Rint), and respiratory resistance and reactance at 5 Hz (Rrs5, Xrs5, respectively) as measured with the impulse oscillation technique were assessed before and 20 min after inhalation of terbutaline from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler via a metal spacer by 92 children (37 healthy controls and 55 asthmatic subjects). The study of healthy children followed a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, whereas the study of asthmatic children was open. Baseline lung function was significantly decreased in asthmatic children as compared with healthy control subjects as reflected by all techniques used in the study. sRaw, Rint, and Rrs5, but not Xrs5, improved significantly with terbutaline as compared with placebo in healthy control subjects. Lung function improved to a significantly greater extent in asthmatic children than in control subjects as reflected by all methods. sRaw provided the best discriminative power of such a bronchodilator response, with a sensitivity of 66% and specificity of 81% at the cutoff level of a 25% decrease in sRaw after bronchodilator administration. In conclusion, bronchodilator response measured by sRaw allows a separation of asthmatic from healthy young children. This may help define asthma in this clinically difficult-to-manage group of young wheezy children. The sensitivity and specificity of the other methods used in the study were less than those of sRaw.     

Radiological and functional changes over 3 years in young children with cystic fibrosis.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate airway disease progression assessed by chest radiology, expiratory interrupter resistance (Rint,exp) and spirometry in young children with cystic fibrosis (CF) over a 3-yr period. Two chest radiographs combined with two R(int,exp) measurements were performed with a 3-yr interval in 21 preschool children (age (mean+/-sd) 3.2+/-0.9 yrs) and 30 schoolchildren with CF (age 7.2+/-1.9 yrs). Chest radiographs were scored using five different CF scoring systems and Rint,exp measurements were expressed as height-adjusted Z-scores. Spirometry was assessed in schoolchildren and the results were expressed as a percentage of predicted values. Chest radiograph scores worsened significantly over the 3-yr period and a tendency towards more pronounced changes was observed, especially for the Wisconsin score, in preschool children. Most preschool and schoolchildren had Rint,exp Z-scores within the normal range at start and follow-up, and the annual change in Rint,exp Z-score was not significant. In schoolchildren, only the forced expiratory volume in one second as a percentage of forced vital capacity declined significantly during the study period. In summary, in young children with cystic fibrosis, chest radiograph scores worsen significantly over time even while lung function remains stable.     

Assessment of airway function in young children with asthma: comparison of spirometry, interrupter technique, and tidal flow by inductance plethsmography

The assessment of airway function in young children requires adaptation of techniques designed for adults and/or application of techniques that do not require complex respiratory maneuvers. We sought to assess two methods of measuring airway function: time to peak expiratory flows as a ratio of expiratory time (T(PTEF)/T(E)), derived from respiratory inductance plethysmography, and total respiratory resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint), both obtained during quiet tidal breathing. Both techniques were referenced to FEV1 and flow at 50% expired volume (FEF50) from conventional spirometry in 30 children aged 4-8 years (median age, 6.9; range, 4.5-8.5 years) with a physician diagnosis of asthma and who were able to perform FEV1 with a repeatability of at least 8%. T(PTEF)/T(E) and Rint were performed in random order followed by spirometry, in order to reduce the possible effects of pulmonary stretch on tidal breathing measures. Coefficients of variation (CV) and mean absolute change/baseline standard deviation were derived for each measurement. Baseline FEV1 did not correlate significantly with T(PTEF)/T(E) (r = 0.025), but did correlate with Rint (r = 0.737, P < 0.001); respective relationships for change after bronchodilator were r = 0.09 (ns) and r = 0.64 (P < 0.001). FEF50 also correlated significantly with Rint (R = 0.769, P < 0.001) but not with T(PTEF)/T(E). FEV1 and FEF50 both increased postbronchodilator, with respective mean changes of 11.4% and 28% (P < 0.001), while Rint decreased by 24.3% (P < 0.001). No significant changes were noted for T(PTEF)/T(E). T(PTEF)/T(E) derived from inductance plethysmography does not detect mild airway obstruction or modest changes in airway caliber following bronchodilator in young children with asthma. The interrupter technique may have a role in assessing baseline airway function and response to therapy in children unable to perform reliable spirometry, and/or when the investigator wishes to avoid the possible influence of forced maneuvers on airway tone.     

Observer variability of lung function measurements in 2-6-yr-old children.

The aim of this study was to assess the within-observer and between-observer variability of lung function measurements in children aged 2-6 yrs. Two observers examined 22 asthmatic children independently according to a predefined protocol. Each observer obtained duplicate measurements of respiratory resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint), respiratory resistance (Rrs,5) and reactance (Xrs,5) at 5 Hz by the impulse oscillation technique and the specific airway resistance (sRaw) by whole body plethysmography. The within-subject SD (SDw) was not significantly different in the two observers. The ratio SDw between observers/mean SDw within observers was 0.94, 1.25, 1.35 and 2.86 for Xrs,5, Rrs,5, sRaw and Rint, respectively, indicating greater between-observer variability of the latter. The systematic difference between observers assessed by the difference between observer means (expressed as a percentage of their mean value) was 11, 7, 6 and 2% for Xrs,5, sRaw, Rrs,5 and Rint, respectively. These differences were statistically significant, except that for Rint. In conclusion, specific airway resistance, impulse oscillation technique and respiratory resistance assessed by the interrupter technique measurements in young children are subject to influence by the observer, and the random variability between observers appears to be particularly great for respiratory resistance assessed by the interrupter technique. The authors suggest that the between-observer variability should be investigated when evaluating novel methods for testing lung function.     

Children with smoking parents have a higher airway resistance measured by the interruption technique

Children exposed to environmental tobacco smoke, during or after pregnancy, are known to have decreased lung function. So far this has been measured using spirometry in schoolchildren and invasive techniques in newborns. The interruption technique (Rint) is a noninvasive technique to measure airway resistance in preschool children. Our aim in this study was to investigate the effect of passive smoke exposure on Rint values in preschool and school-aged children. Rint values were obtained from 557 children in two nursery and two primary schools in the north of the Netherlands. Besides information on parental smoking habits, we collected data on characteristics that might affect airway resistance (respiratory symptoms, atopy, and family history for asthma), using a short questionnaire. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate the associations of these characteristics with Rint, for the whole group as well as for the preschool group separately. Atopy or a positive family history for asthma did not affect Rint values in the total group of 4-12-year-olds. However, as may be expected, height, age, weight, and having respiratory symptoms were associated with Rint. Moreover, Rint was significantly increased if parents smoked three or more cigarettes a day in the presence of their child. This result remained after subgroup analysis in the preschool children (4-6 years old). We conclude that passive smoke exposure is associated with a significantly higher airway resistance in preschool and school-aged children measured by Rint.     

Airway resistance by the interrupter technique: Which algorithm for measuring pressure?

Airway resistance using the interrupter technique (Rint) can be measured using commercial devices which employ different algorithms for estimating pressure change. We aim to describe differences in Rint due to algorithm. We compared Rint and change in Rint after bronchodilator, using four algorithms to estimate pressure change following interruption: 1) two-point back-extrapolation to interruption from points 70 msec and 30 msec from interruption, and similarly 2) to 15 msec from interruption, 3) at two-thirds from interruption, and 4) near end-interruption. Flow was measured immediately before interruption. Our subjects were 39 asymptomatic children 2-5 years old with previous intermittent wheeze. Rint differed significantly with algorithm. Geometric mean Rint (95% confidence interval (CI)) for algorithms 1-4 were 1.21 kPa x l(-1) x sec (1.18-1.24 kPa x l(-1) x sec), 1.31 kPa x l(-1) x sec (1.28-1.34 kPa x l(-1) x sec), 1.57 kPa x l(-1) x sec (1.54-1.61 kPa x l(-1) x sec) and 1.71 kPa x l(-1) x sec (1.67-1.75 kPa x l(-1) x sec), respectively. Measurement of change in R(int) following bronchodilator (BDR) did not differ on average with algorithm. Geometric means (95% CI) for BDR measurements for algorithms 1-4 were 29.9% (26.0-34.0%), 30.4% (26.4-34.5%), 32.9% (28.8-37.1%), and 31.7% (27.6-35.8%), respectively. However, measurement of change in individuals could differ by up to 40%, depending on algorithm. In conclusion, there are significant differences in Rint, depending on algorithm used to estimate pressure change. Measurement of change in Rint is unaffected on average, although in individuals there could be significant differences. Each laboratory should state its method and use the same algorithm for longitudinal and group data.     

The interrupter technique to assess airway responsiveness in children with cystic fibrosis

The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the interrupter technique (Rint) in measuring airway responsiveness in children with cystic fibrosis. Fifty children (aged 6-16 years) with cystic fibrosis performed six Rint measurements followed by three acceptable forced expiratory maneuvers. Each child then inhaled 5 mg of nebulized salbutamol by facemask. After 20 min the Rint and forced expiratory measurements were repeated. In the population as a whole a moderate but significant correlation between inverse Rint and FEV1 values was observed, both before and after inhaled bronchodilator (r=0.71 and 0.72, respectively, P < 0.001). However, when changes in Rint and FEV1 readings following inhaled bronchodilator were examined, no relationship was seen. Indeed, the two methods identified completely different subsets of children as being bronchodilator responsive. These results indicate that although a relationship exists between Rint and FEV1 in the whole population, this is not the case in individual children. Rint and FEV1 reflect different aspects of lung function. It is not appropriate to use Rint as a simple alternative for FEV1 in children with cystic fibrosis when assessing airway responsiveness.     

Comparison of resistance measured by the interrupter technique and by passive mechanics in sedated infants.

Airways resistance measured by the interrupter technique (Rint) requires little patient cooperation and has been successfully used in young children, but little studied in infants. The authors aimed to evaluate the measurement of Rint in infants, using a commercially available device (the MicroRint), by comparing it with an established technique to measure respiratory resistance: the single breath occlusion technique (SBT); and a measure of airflow obstruction during forced expiration. Infants <18 months old with a history of wheeze, sedated with triclofos for pulmonary function testing, had measurements taken and compared to Rint (using the MicroRint), respiratory system resistance (Rrs) by SBT, and to maximal flow at functional residual capacity (V'maxFRC). Paired data from 25 of 37 infants studied was obtained. There was a significant difference between Rint (mean 2.94+/-0.68) and Rrs (4.02+/-0.87), but the two measures were strongly correlated (r=0.7). Rint was negatively correlated with V'maxFRC (r=-0.63). Smaller infants failed to trigger the MicroRint. Interrupter resistance values in infants are significantly lower than values of respiratory system resistance obtained by passive mechanics. However, there is a strong correlation between the two measurements, as well as between resistance measured using the interrupter technique and maximal flow at functional residual capacity, which indicates that resistance measured using the interrupter technique may be a useful marker of airway obstruction in infants. There remain a number of theoretical and technical problems which require further exploration.     

Measurements of interrupter resistance: reference values for children 3-13 yrs of age.

The interrupter technique is a convenient and sensitive technique for studying airway function in subjects who cannot actively participate in (forced) ventilatory function tests. Reference values for preschool children exist but are lacking for children >7 yrs. Reference values were obtained for expiratory interrupter resistance (R(int,e)) in 208 healthy Dutch Caucasian children 3-13 yrs of age. A curvilinear relationship between R(int,e) and height was observed, similar to published airways resistance data measured by plethysmography. No significant differences in cross-sectional trend or level of R(int,e) were observed according to sex. It was found that Z-scores could be used to express individual R(int,e) values and to describe intra- and interindividual differences based on the reference equation: 10logR(int,e)=0.645-0.00668x standing height (cm) kPa x L(-1) x s(-1) and residual SD (0.093 kPa x L(-1) x s(-1)). Expiratory interrupter resistance provides a tool for clinical and epidemiological assessment of airway function in a large age range.     

How should airways resistance be measured in young children: mask or mouthpiece?

The reproducibility and acceptability of airways resistance measurements using the interrupter technique (MicroRint) obtained using a mouthpiece were compared with those using a face mask. Fifty children aged 4-7 yrs performed four sets of six Rint measurements; two using a mouthpiece and two using a face mask with integral mouthpiece. Complete data were obtained from 45 (90%) children using the mouthpiece and 43 (86%) children using the mask. The two methods were equally repeatable with comparable intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation. Mean Rint values obtained using the mouthpiece were significantly lower than those using the face mask ((mean+/-SD) mouthpiece=0.81+/-0.18 kPa x L(-1) x s, mask=0.88+/-0.24 kPa x L(-1) x s p=0.0002). Although the mean paired differences between the two methods were small (0.07 kPa x L(-1) x s), the ICC and limits of agreement confirmed that the two methods could not be used interchangeably. Sixty-seven per cent of children preferred the face mask but this was more time-consuming (p = 0.03). Children did not produce more repeatable results using their preferred method, nor did they improve with practice. Repeatable airway resistance measurements using the interrupter technique can be obtained from young children using either a mouthpiece or a face mask, but there are significant clinical and statistical differences between the results obtained.