Comparison of etomidate and propofol for anaesthesia in microlaryngeal surgery

Propofol and etomidate were compared as hypnotics in total intravenous anaesthesia for microlaryngeal surgery combined with jet ventilation. Two groups of 15 patients were studied. In group 1, propofol 2.0 mg/kg was used for induction. For maintenance a continuous infusion of 12 mg/kg/hour was used for the first 10 minutes, followed by 9 mg/kg/hour for the next 10 minutes and 6 mg/kg/hour thereafter. In group 2, the induction dose of etomidate was 0.3 mg/kg followed by continuous infusion of 1.8 mg/kg/hour for 10 minutes, 1.5 mg/kg/hour for the next 10 minutes and 1.0 mg/kg/hour thereafter. Alfentanil was given for analgesia and suxamethonium for muscle relaxation. The propofol group showed better surgical conditions, more stable anaesthesia and better recovery according to the Steward score. Recovery times to opening eyes on command were comparable for both groups.     

Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol,alfentanil, and oxygen-air: three different dosage schemes

Three different dosage schemes of propofol infusions combined with a fixed-rate alfentanil infusion were investigated in total intravenous anaesthesia. In 30 premedicated patients, divided at random into three groups, anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg.kg-1 immediately followed by an alfentanil infusion 10 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 as a loading dose which was decreased after ten minutes to a maintenance dose of 1 microgram.kg-1.min-1. Vecuronium bromide 0.1 mg.kg-1 was used as the muscle relaxant. After induction of anaesthesia a propofol infusion 2 mg.kg-1.hr-1 was started in group A, 3 mg.kg-1.hr-1 in group B and 4 mg.kg-1 hr-1 in group C. At signs of light anaesthesia supplementary bolus doses of 20 mg propofol and 1 mg alfentanil were given. The patients' lungs were ventilated with air-oxygen (FIO2 0.35). The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures showed no statistical significant differences between the three groups. A significant (P less than 0.01) decrease of the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures was present after induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation. Recovery was uneventful in all but one patient, who had ventilatory depression that responded to naloxone (0.2 mg IV). Awareness did not occur in any patient. The only difference between the three groups was the higher number of supplementary bolus doses of propofol and alfentanil needed in group A (P less than 0.01). In total intravenous anaesthesia propofol 3 and 4 mg.kg-1.hr-1 as a maintenance dose combined with a two-step fixed-rate alfentanil infusion provided smooth anaesthesia and uneventful rapid recovery.     

Propofol and alfentanil infusion

In 42 patients undergoing major surgery, anaesthesia was induced by intravenous alfentanil 10 micrograms/kg together with methohexitone 1.5 mg/kg or propofol 2 mg/kg. An infusion of six times these doses per hour was then started; the rate was varied subsequently as indicated by the monitoring of arterial blood pressure, heart rate, EEG and frontalis electromyogram. The mean duration of infusion was 76.7 minutes for propofol and 74.5 minutes for methohexitone and the infusion was stopped about 10 minutes before the end of surgery in each group. The induction dose differed, but the total dose requirement for the two drugs was similar. In every case, anaesthesia was satisfactory. Methohexitone caused a significant rise in mean pulse rate throughout anaesthesia (p less than 0.05, paired t-test). There was no change in mean pulse rate during propofol infusion. The dose of alfentanil used provided excellent control of autonomic reflexes, with negligible respiratory depression. Naloxone was not required. Propofol provided better anaesthesia than methohexitone, with fewer side effects (p less than 0.05, Chi squared test), easier control of the level of narcosis and faster recovery (p less than 0.001, t-test after log transformation).     

Intravenous infusion of propofol for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia during endoscopic carbon dioxide laser ENT procedures with high frequency jet ventilation

Fourteen patients of ASA grades 1 3 were anaesthetised with continuous infusions of propofol and alfentanil for endoscopic carbon dioxide laser ENT microsurgery. Their lungs were ventilated with an oxygen-air mixture using a high frequency jet ventilator. Propofol was given at an initial rate of 120 μg/kg/minute for 10 minutes after a bolus dose of 2.6 mg/kg, and then at 80 fig μg/kg/minute. Alfentanil was given at a rate of 0.5 μg/kg/minute. Arterial pressure decreased significantly after the bolus dose. It increased significantly for a few minutes after laryngoscopy and returned to baseline values during maintenance of anaesthesia. Heart rate increased significantly during induction and until laryngoscopy was performed but it decreased below its initial value after 5 minutes of maintenance. Platelet count and the degree of aggregation did not change during infusion of propofol.     

Tracheal intubation after induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone or propofol without muscle relaxants

This study was designed to compare the ease of performing laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation without muscle relaxants after the induction of anaesthesia with either thiopentone or propofol in 106 patients scheduled for elective surgery. Thiopentone (5 mg/kg) or propofol (2.5 mg/kg), supplemented with lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) and alfentanil (30 micrograms/kg), were used in random order for the induction of anaesthesia. Jaw tone, visualisation of the larynx, position of vocal cords, ease of intubation and tolerance of the tracheal tube were assessed. The jaw was relaxed and the vocal cords were immobile/open in most patients in both groups. Visualisation of the larynx was good in 60 and 46% and intubation was easy in 48 and 22% of the patients given thiopentone and propofol, respectively (P less than 0.05 between groups for intubation). After induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone or propofol, endotracheal intubation is not recommended without the use of muscle relaxants.     

Propofol for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia at Caesarean section A comparison with thiopentone/enflurane

A propofol infusion regimen and a standard general anaesthetic were compared in 40 Chinese women undergoing elective Caesarean section. Twenty patients received propofol 2 mg/kg for induction of anaesthesia followed by propofol 6 mg/kg/hour, while 20 patients received thiopentone 4 mg/kg with enflurane 1% for maintenance of anaesthesia. All patients were given atracurium and their lungs ventilated with nitrous oxide 50% in oxygen until delivery of the neonate. The hypertensive response after intubation was of shorter duration in the propofol group compared with the thiopentone group. Induction to delivery times ranged from 5 to 14 minutes and neonates from both groups had similar and satisfactory Apgar scores. Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scores and umbilical cord blood gas analysis. However, a prolonged propofol infusion time before delivery may cause lower Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scores. There were no differences in maternal recovery times or psychomotor performance.     

Preinduction atropine or glycopyrrolate and hemodynamic changes associated with induction and maintenance of anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil

Total intravenous anesthesia by infusions of propofol and alfentanil may be associated with decreases in heart rate and blood pressure. The effects of two vagolytic agents on these hemodynamic changes were studied in 24 ASA physical status 1 patients undergoing body surface surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to receive atropine 10 micrograms/kg, glycopyrrolate, 5 micrograms/kg, or 0.9% sodium chloride, intravenously, 5 min before induction of anesthesia with loading doses of alfentanil, 50 micrograms/kg and propofol 1 mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained with infusions of alfentanil 50 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1, and propofol 10 mg.kg-1.hr-1 for the first 10 min, 8 mg.kg-1.hr-1 for the next 10 min, and 6 mg.kg-1.hr-1 thereafter. Patients given glycopyrrolate before anesthesia had significantly higher arterial pressures than did patients receiving either atropine or saline, even though heart rates increased equally after glycopyrrolate and atropine.     

The effect of topical lignocaine on intubating conditions after propofol-alfentanil induction

Background: Recent studies have found satisfactory conditions for intubation of the trachea without using muscle relaxants using an intravenous technique combining propofol and alfentanil. In this study we evaluate intubating conditions with this method and either lignocaine applied topically in the larynx and trachea or placebo.
Methods: Sixty adult patients of ASA class I were premedicated with diazepam 15–20 mg and randomly allocated to one of two groups. For induction of anaesthesia both groups were given propofol 2.5 mg/kg and alfentanil 30 μg/kg. One group received 4 ml of lignocaine 40 mg/ml (≤3 mg/kg) topically into the larynx and trachea (group L), the other group an equal amount of isotonic saline (group S) in a double-blind design. Intubation conditions were assessed as excellent, good, moderately good, poor or impossible, scored on the basis of jaw relaxation, ease of insertion of the tube and coughing on intubation.
Results: The total score for group L was significantly better than the score for group S ( P <0.0001) with significant differences with respect to ease of intubation and coughing after intubation.
Conclusions: Induction of anaesthesia with propofol 2.5 mg/kg and alfentanil 30 μg/kg combined with 4 ml of lignocaine-spray 40 mg/ml into the larynx and trachea offered consistent and satisfactory intubation conditions. We thus recommend this method for tracheal intubation, where the use of muscle relaxants is not indicated.     

Reducing the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation

The effects of alfentanil and fentanyl on controlling the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation have been compared. Five groups of ten patients were studied. Induction was with thiopentone 4 mg/kg. Thirty seconds later group 1 received 1 ml/20 kg saline, group 2 received 15 micrograms/kg alfentanil, group 3 received 30 micrograms/kg alfentanil and group 4 received 5 micrograms/kg fentanyl one minute before induction. Suxamethonium was given 60 seconds after induction and intubation of the trachea was performed 150 seconds after the start of induction. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were recorded every minute throughout and compared with pre-induction control values. Control patients (group 1) showed significant increases associated with tracheal intubation in all haemodynamic variables. No increases were noted in groups receiving 30 micrograms/kg alfentanil or 5 micrograms/kg fentanyl. The heart rate, but not blood pressure, increased with intubation after 15 micrograms/kg alfentanil. The mean time to movement in 50% of the control patients was 7 minutes. In those given 15 and 30 micrograms/kg alfentanil it was 11 and 12 minutes respectively. In those given 5 micrograms/kg fentanyl it was greater than 15 minutes. Alfentanil is shown to reduce the cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and intubation and the effect appears to have a shorter duration than that of fentanyl.     

Assessment of tracheal intubating conditions in children using remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxant

BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation in children can be achieved by deep inhalational anaesthesia or an intravenous anaesthetic and a muscle relaxant, suxamethonium being widely used despite several side-effects. Studies have shown that oral intubation can be facilitated safely and effectively in children after induction of anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil without a muscle relaxant. Remifentanil is a new, ultra-short acting, selective mu-receptor agonist that is 20-30 times more potent than alfentanil. This clinical study was designed to assess whether combination of propofol and remifentanil could be used without a muscle relaxant to facilitate tracheal intubation in children. METHODS: Forty children (5-10 years) admitted for adenotonsillectomy were randomly allocated to one of two groups to receive remifentanil 2 microg.kg(-1) (Gp I) or remifentanil 3 microg.kg(-1) (Gp II) before the induction of anaesthesia with i.v. propofol 3 mg.kg(-1). No neuromuscular blocking agent was administered. Intubating conditions were assessed using a four-point scoring system based on ease of laryngoscopy, jaw relaxation, position of vocal cords, degree of coughing and limb movement. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) measured noninvasively before induction of anaesthesia to 5 min after intubation (seven time points). RESULTS: Tracheal intubation was successful in all patients without requiring neuromuscular blocking agent. Intubating conditions were clinically acceptable in 10 of 20 patients (50%) in Gp I compared with 18 of 20 patients (90%) in Gp II (P < 0.05). MAP and HR decreased in both groups after induction of anaesthesia (P < 0.01). Both HR and MAP were significantly lower in Gp II compared with Gp I after tracheal intubation (P < 0.01). No patient in the present study developed bradycardia or hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that remifentanil (3 microg.kg(-1)), administered before propofol (3 mg.kg(-1)) provides acceptable tracheal intubating conditions in children, and completely inhibited the increase in HR and MAP associated with intubation.     

The effect on intraocular pressure of endotracheal intubation or laryngeal mask use during TIVA without the use of muscle relaxants

BACKGROUND: Depolarizing and non-depolarizing muscle relaxants possess many untoward side effects. In most patients endotracheal intubation may be performed with a propofol and alfentanil combination. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) and haemodynamics of endotracheal (ET) intubation or laryngeal mask (LMA) insertion during total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) without the use of muscle relaxants. METHODS: In a randomised study, 20 patients scheduled for elective orthopaedic surgery were assigned to two groups of 10 patients. Anaesthesia was induced with i.v. alfentanil 40 micrograms/kg and propofol 2.5 mg/kg. LMA insertion or ET intubation was achieved by the same anaesthesiologist. Airway score, insertion score, patient response and haemodynamics were recorded. IOP measurements were recorded before and after induction, 1 and 2 min after ET intubation or LMA insertion, and 1 and 2 min after extubation. RESULTS: Mean arterial pressure and heart rate after insertion of the airway management devices was significantly higher than induction values in the ET group (P < 0.05), while during 2-3 min no significant changes were observed in LMA group. In all patients following propofol and alfentanil induction, IOP was significantly lower than preinduction values (P < 0.001). IOP following extubation was significantly higher than preinduction values in the ET group, but not in the LMA group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: During TIVA without the use of muscle relaxants neither LMA insertion nor ET intubation increased the IOP, but ET extubation did.     

Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxant--a technique using sevoflurane vital capacity induction and alfentanil

This randomized controlled study examined intubating conditions and haemodynamic changes following sevoflurane nitrous oxide induction in four groups: three different doses of alfentanil compared with low-dose alfentanil and suxamethonium. All patients received atropine 0.3 mg i.v. before induction of anaesthesia with vital capacity breaths of sevoflurane 8% (more than 7% in the inspiratory gas) in 60% nitrous oxide and oxygen. Patients were allocated randomly to four groups of intravenous supplements: group SA20, alfentanil 20 microg x kg(-1); group SA25, alfentanil 25 microg x kg(-1); group SA30, alfentanil 30 microg x kg(-1); group SSA, alfentanil 10 microg x kg(-1) and suxamethonium 1 mg x kg(-1). Orotracheal intubation and assessment of intubating conditions was performed by one of the investigators who was blinded to the subject's group. Intubating conditions were satisfactory or excellent in 83%, 80%, 92% and 96% of patients in groups SA20, SA25, SA30 and SSA respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. The increase in heart rate associated with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation was effectively attenuated in all groups. Mean arterial pressure decreased significantly and similarly after induction in all groups. Two minutes after intubation the mean arterial pressure was increased significantly (P<0.05) compared to the post-induction value in group SSA. The intubating conditions obtained with sevoflurane plus alfentanil 30 microg x kg(-1) were comparable to those provided by the sevoflurane, suxamethonium and alfentanil 10 microg x kg(-1) combination.     

Recovery from propofol infusion as the main agent for outpatient arthroscopy

Propofol by continuous intravenous infusion has been compared with isoflurane as the main anaesthetic agent for outpatient arthroscopy of the knee. In 40 unpremedicated patients, anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg and vecuronium bromide 0.1 mg/kg and maintained after tracheal intubation with nitrous oxide 66% in oxygen. One group received 3% isoflurane prior to intubation and 0.9% during maintenance, while the other received a continuous intravenous infusion of propofol at a rate of 10 mg/kg/hour. Recovery was assessed by the time to opening eyes, to be able to answer five questions correctly, to recovery of ocular balance (Maddox Wing test) and by comparing pre- and postoperative performance in a paper and pencil test (the p-deletion test). After 3 hours all the patients were fit for discharge. Recovery tests showed no differences between the groups. All patients were satisfied with the anaesthesia. Full recovery took on average 1.5 days (range between 1 hour and 14 days) in both groups. Patients' opinion 1 month after the procedure should be included in every study concerning recovery. Anaesthesia by continuous propofol infusion results in quick recovery comparable with that following isoflurane anaesthesia.     

The effects of remifentanil and alfentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on the endocrine response to abdominal hysterectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of remifentanil with alfentanil as a part of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on plasma concentrations of cortisol, insulin, and glucose, and hemodynamic responses in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 24 ASA physical status I female patients scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Premedicated patients were randomly allocated to receive either remifentanil-propofol (Group R) or alfentanil-propofol (Group A). The loading dose of the study drug was administered over 60 seconds (remifentanil l microg kg(-l) or alfentanil 10 microg kg(-l)) followed by a continuous infusion (remifentanil 0.2 microg kg(-l) min(-l) or alfentanil 0.5 microg kg(-l) min(-l)). In both groups, propofol was administered until loss of consciousness and maintained with a propofol infusion rate of 100 microg kg(-l) min(-l). After induction of anesthesia, all patients were manually ventilated by mask with O2-air mixture for 20 minutes. Then rocuronium 0.6 mg kg(-l) was given for tracheal intubation. MEASUREMENTS: Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded. Plasma concentrations of cortisol, insulin, and glucose were measured during anesthesia and in the recovery room. MAIN RESULTS: In Group R, MAP and HR were lower after tracheal intubation and skin incision than in Group A (p < 0.05). Plasma cortisol concentrations decreased from baseline values at 20 minutes after induction, after tracheal intubation, and skin incision in Group R (p < 0.001). Plasma concentrations of cortisol and glucose increased from baseline values at 30 minutes after skin incision and continued to increase in both groups (p = 0.001). Plasma concentrations of cortisol, insulin, and glucose did not differ between groups at all sampling times. CONCLUSION: Remifentanil provided better hemodynamic stability than alfentanil during anesthesia and surgery. However, both remifentanil and alfentanil had similar effects on the stress endocrine response to abdominal hysterectomy.     

Total intravenous anaesthesia for laparoscopy

Two techniques of total intravenous anaesthesia for laparoscopy were compared in 80 patients. Group 1 received alfentanil, propofol and vecuronium, and Group 2 alfentanil, midazolam, ketamine and vecuronium. Haemodynamic stability after induction and the pressor response to tracheal intubation were significantly different. There was no significant difference in recovery times between the two groups and little difference in other postoperative sequelae.     

Bispectral index during modified rapid sequence induction using thiopentone or propofol and rocuronium

This randomized controlled trial compared Bispectral Index (BIS) values in 40 patients after a modified rapid sequence induction using thiopentone 4 mg/kg or propofol 2 mg/kg with rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg as muscle relaxant. Endotracheal intubation was performed at 60 seconds from induction of anaesthesia and BIS values were recorded for three minutes after induction. At the 120, 150 and 180 second measurements there was a significantly greater proportion of subjects with BIS values < or = 60 ("anaesthetized") in the propofol group compared with the thiopentone group (P values < 0.02, < 0.01 and < 0.01 respectively). All intubations were completed within two minutes. No explicit recall of intubation was detected clinically with either induction agent. The BIS scores we have measured suggest that thiopentone 4 mg/kg is more likely to be associated with lighter planes of anaesthesia and consequent risk of awareness than propofol 2 mg/kg, if intubation is delayed or prolonged.     

Intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil. The influence of age and weight

Sixty healthy patients undergoing body surface surgery were anaesthetised with continuous infusions of propofol (200 micrograms/kg/minute) and alfentanil (0.25 microgram/kg/minute). Additional bolus doses of propofol (20 mg) were given if movement occurred. The incidence of patient movement in response to skin incision was significantly less in patients over 45 years of age than in those below 45 years (p less than 0.05). Maintenance dosage of propofol sufficient to abolish movement decreased with increasing age (p less than 0.001). Systolic blood pressure decreased in most patients over the first 10 minutes of anaesthesia and the magnitude of this decrease increased with age (p less than 0.0001). These parameters did not correlate strongly with body weight. Dose requirements of propofol are not the same for patients of all ages and strongly suggest that young and old patients should not be treated as a homogeneous group, either for investigative or clinical purposes.     

Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol or inhalational anaesthesia with isoflurane for major abdominal surgery: Recovery characteristics and postoperative oxygenation—an international multicentre study

Two hundred and ten adult patients undergoing open cholecystectomy, vagotomy or gastrectomy were included in a randomised multicentre study to compare postoperative nausea and vomiting, oxygen saturations for the first three postoperative nights, time to return of gastrointestinal function, mobilisation, and discharge from the hospital following induction and maintenance of anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil or with thiopentone, nitrous oxide, isoflurane and alfentanil. Recovery from anaesthesia was significantly faster in the propofol group (mean (SD) times to eye opening and giving correct date of birth of 14.0 (SD 13.8) and 25.5 (SD 29.5) minutes, and 18.5 (SD 14.8) and 35.5 (SD 37.2) minutes in the propofol and isoflurane groups respectively). There was significantly less nausea in the propofol group (15.4%) than in the isoflurane group (33.7%) in the first two postoperative hours (p < 0.003) but not thereafter. There were no significant differences between the groups in any other recovery characteristics. The incidence of hypoxaemia (arterial oxygen saturation less than 93%) was close to 70% in both groups for the first three postoperative nights, indicating the need for oxygen therapy after major abdominal surgery.     

Propofol auto-co-induction as an alternative to midazolam co-induction for ambulatory surgery

We propose the use of an intravenous propofol/propofol auto-co-induction technique as an alternative to propofol/midazolam for induction of anaesthesia. We have studied 54 unpremedicated ASA 1 or 2 patients undergoing day-stay anaesthesia for minor orthopaedic surgery. All received 10 micrograms.kg-1 or alfentanil before induction, followed by either midazolam 0.05 mg.kg-1, propofol 0.4 mg.kg-1 or saline, and 2 min later, a propofol infusion at a rate of 50 mg.kg-1.h-1 until loss of eyelash reflex. We compared pre- and postinduction haemodynamic changes, complications at insertion of a laryngeal mask airway and recovery from anaesthesia in the three groups. Both co-induction techniques showed less postinduction hypotension and significant reduction of the total induction dose of propofol when compared to the control group. In the propofol/propofol group there was a decreased incidence of apnoea during induction of anaesthesia. These patients were discharged from hospital 2 h after the end of anaesthesia whereas patients in the midazolam/propofol group were discharged after 2 1/2 h (p < 0.001).     

Bispectral Index (BIS) may not predict awareness reaction to intubation in surgical patients.

Bispectral Index (BIS) has been marketed as a measure of the hypnotic component of anesthesia and is recommended as a guide for the administration of hypnotic drugs during anesthesia. BIS values between 40 and 60 are recommended for surgery under general anesthesia. This study investigates whether a BIS baseline between 50 and 60 prevents awareness reaction to endotracheal intubation. After approval by the university's Ethics Committee, 20 consenting patients were enrolled in the study. Midazolam (0.1 mg/kg PO) was given 30 minutes before induction. Anesthesia was induced with alfentanil (10 mcg/kg, followed by 2 mcg/kg(-1) x min(-1)) and propofol infusion was adjusted to a BIS target level between 50 and 60. Propofol infusion rate was maintained constant for 5 minutes with constant BIS. Prior to intubation, patients were tested in one-minute intervals for awareness using Tunstall's isolated forearm technique. Three minutes after endotracheal intubation, the study period ended and surgery was performed. After intubation, 8 of 20 patients showed an awareness reaction, squeezing the investigator's hand in response to a command. No patient had recall. Comparison of patients with and without awareness reaction revealed no differences in BIS before or after intubation. This study shows that a BIS value between 50 and 60 prior to intubation is inadequate to prevent an awareness reaction to endotracheal intubation during propofol/alfentanil anesthesia. Because BIS cannot differentiate between patients with and without awareness reaction, its value as a monitor for awareness and a measurement of the hypnotic component of anesthesia must be questioned.