Effect of SanOrg123781A, a synthetic hexadecasaccharide, on clot-bound thrombin and factor Xa in vitro and in vivo

Summary. Factor (F)Xa and thrombin bound to the clot during its formation contribute to the propensity of thrombi to activate the coagulation system. The aim of this work was to study the inhibition of clot‐bound FXa and clot‐bound thrombin by SanOrg123781A, a synthetic hexadecasaccharide that enhances the inhibition of thrombin and FXa by antithrombin (AT). SanOrg123781A, designed to exhibit low non‐specific binding to proteins other than AT, was compared with heparin. In buffer, heparin and SanOrg123781A inhibited FXa and thrombin at similar concentrations [concentration inhibiting 50% (IC₅₀) of Xa and IIa activity were, respectively: heparin 120 ± 7 and 3 ± 1 ng mL^?1; SanOrg123781A 77 ± 5 and 4 ± 1 ng mL^?1]. In human plasma, the activity of both compounds was reduced, although the activity of heparin was much more affected than that of SanOrg123781A (IC₅₀ values for inhibition of FXa and FIIa activity were, respectively: heparin 100 ± 5 and 800 ± 40 ng mL^?1; SanOrg123781A 10 ± 5 and 30 ± 3 ng mL^?1). We demonstrated, in agreement with our previous results, that the procoagulant activity of the clot is essentially due to clot‐bound FXa and to some extent to clot‐bound thrombin. We showed that heparin and SanOrg123781A were able to inhibit fragment F1+2 generation induced by clot‐bound FXa with IC₅₀ values of 2 ± 0.5 µg mL^?1 and 0.6 ± 0.2 µg mL^?1, respectively. Both compounds also inhibited clot‐bound thrombin activity, the IC₅₀ values of heparin and SanOrg123781A being 1 ± 0.01 µg mL^?1 and 0.1 ± 0.1 µg mL^?1, respectively. Moreover, both heparin and SanOrg123781A significantly inhibited fibrinopeptide A generated by the action of clot‐bound thrombin on fibrinogen but also by free thrombin generated from prothrombin by clot‐bound FXa with IC₅₀ values of 4 ± 0.6 and 1 ± 0.1 µg mL^?1, respectively. As with clot‐bound enzymatic activities, SanOrg123781A was three times more active than heparin in vivo on fibrinogen accretion onto a pre‐existing thrombus and as activators of recombinant tissue‐type plasminogen activator‐induced thrombolysis. In conclusion, due to the specific activities of SanOrg123781A, this compound is much more active than heparin in the presence of plasma proteins, on clot‐bound enzymes and in in vivo models of thrombosis/thrombolysis.     

Activity of a synthetic hexadecasaccharide (SanOrg123781A) in a pig model of arterial thrombosis.

The activity of SanOrg123781A, a new synthetic antithrombotic drug inhibiting both factor Xa and thrombin through antithrombin (AT), was compared to that of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and of the synthetic pentasaccharide (fondaparinux, SP) in an ex vivo arterial thrombosis model in the pig. Six groups of four pigs were administered intravenously with SanOrg123781A (1, 3, 10 and 30 nmol kg(-1)), UFH (30 nmol kg(-1)) or SP (30 nmol kg(-1)). In this arterial model in which platelet thrombus was formed on a thrombogenic surface under a constant high shear rate, UFH and SP had moderate antithrombotic effects while SanOrg123781A exhibited a strong, dose-dependent inhibitory activity on platelet adhesion and platelet thrombus formation. In contrast to UFH, SanOrg123781A did not modify the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) even at 30 nmol kg(-1), but strongly inhibited thrombin generation. At the same dose, despite a lower antithrombotic activity than SanOrg123781A, UFH significantly affected all the coagulation parameters. Taken together, these results show that SanOrg123781A, due to its potent and selective antifactor Xa and antifactor IIa activities is a promising new antithrombotic agent even in arterial setting.     

Heparin is not required for detection of antibodies associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), with or without thrombosis, is a common and often serious complication of heparin therapy. Platelet-activating, heparin-induced antibodies characteristic of HIT are thought to be specific for complexes formed between platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin, and such complexes are routinely used for antibody detection. We studied the binding of HIT antibodies to PF4 complexed with heparin fractions of uniform molecular size or linear polyanions other than heparin and found that many compounds other than heparin form complexes with PF4 that are suitable for antibody detection, provided they carry strong negative charges spaced about 0.5 nm apart along the molecular backbone and are of sufficient length to span about 40% of the circumference of the PF4 tetramer. Polyvinyl phosphonate was among the compounds that were equivalent to heparin. Thus neither a polysaccharide chain nor sulfate side groups--the hallmarks of heparin structure--are required for HIT antibody detection. The findings support the view that antibodies associated with HIT are specific for conformational changes that take place in the positively charged PF4 molecule when it reacts with a suitable, linear polyanion.     

Effects of SanOrg123781A, a synthetic hexadecasaccharide, in a mouse model of electrically induced carotid artery injury: synergism with the antiplatelet agent clopidogrel

SanOrg123781A is a synthetic hexadecasaccharide that displays antithrombin-dependent inhibition of factor Xa and thrombin and potent antithrombotic effects. The antithrombotic activity of SanOrg123781A has been studied in a new mouse model of arterial thrombosis, where thrombus formation was induced by the application of an electrical current to the adventitial surface of a carotid artery. In this model, antiplatelet agents such as the ADP-receptor antagonist clopidogrel (30 mg/kg, p.o. 2 h before stimulation) and the GpIIb/IIIa antagonist SR121566A [3-(N-[4-(4-[amino(imino)methyl]phenyl)-1,3-thiazol-2-yl]-N-[1-(carboxymethyl)piperidin-4-yl]amino)propionic acid, trihydrochloride] (0.3 mg/kg, i.v. 5 min before stimulation) strongly prolonged the time to occlusion (TTO) (761 and 473% increases, respectively), whereas aspirin was devoid of antithrombotic activity. Standard heparin (2 mg/kg, i.v.), the low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin (20 mg/kg, i.v.), and the synthetic, antithrombin-dependent inhibitor of factor Xa fondaparinux (10 mg/kg, i.v.) were also active in this model (742, 707, and 602% TTO increases, respectively). Interestingly, SanOrg123781A was active at much lower doses than the other oligosaccharides (554% increase in TTO at 0.3 mg/kg, i.v. 5 min before stimulation). Low doses of SanOrg123781A administered in combination with low doses of clopidogrel led to a marked increase in TTO, which was statistically more important than the additive effects of the two compounds given alone. These results indicate that SanOrg123781A exerts a potent antithrombotic activity in a mouse model of arterial thrombosis when compared with reference compounds and show that the combination of SanOrg123781A with clopidogrel leads to a marked synergistic antithrombotic effect.     

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia – therapeutic concentrations of danaparoid,unlike fondaparinux and direct thrombin inhibitors,inhibit formation of platelet factor 4–heparin complexes

Summary. Background: Treatment of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a disorder in which anti‐platelet factor 4 (PF4)–heparin antibodies cause platelet activation and hypercoagulability, requires alternative (non‐heparin) anticoagulation. Treatment options include direct thrombin inhibitors [lepirudin and argatroban (approved), and bivalirudin], danaparoid (approved) (mixture of anticoagulant glycosaminoglycans), or fondaparinux (synthetic heparin‐mimicking pentasaccharide). PF4–heparin complexes form at optimal stoichiometric ratios. Objectives: To compare the effects of these various non‐heparin anticoagulants in disrupting the formation of PF4–heparin complexes, and PF4‐containing immune complexes. Patients/methods: Sera were obtained from patients with serologically confirmed HIT. The effects of the alternative anticoagulants on PF4 and PF4–heparin complex interactions with platelets, as well as HIT antibody binding and platelet activation, were investigated. Results: Danaparoid at very low concentrations increased PF4 binding to platelets. In therapeutic concentrations, however, it decreased PF4 binding to platelets (P = 0.0004), displaced PF4–heparin complexes from platelets (P = 0.0033) and PF4 from the surface of a PF4‐transfected HEK‐293 EBNA cell line expressing the PF4 receptor CXCR3‐B (P = 0.0408), reduced PF4–heparin complex size (P = 0.025), inhibited HIT antibody binding to PF4–heparin complexes (P = 0.001), and prevented platelet activation by HIT antibodies (P = 0.046). Although fondaparinux also interfered with PF4 binding to platelets, HIT antibody binding to PF4–heparin complexes, and activation of platelets by HIT antibodies, these effects occurred only at supratherapeutic concentrations. The direct thrombin inhibitors had no effect at any concentrations. Conclusions: Danaparoid uniquely interferes with the pathogenesis of HIT by disrupting PF4‐containing immune complexes at therapeutic dose concentrations. It is possible that these effects contribute to its therapeutic efficacy.     

False-positive tests for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus

Summary.  Background : Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe complication of heparin therapy that can be associated with arterial or venous thrombosis and is caused by antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4)–heparin complex. Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) have been reported with positive tests for PF4–heparin complex antibodies by antigen assay. Whether such patients can be treated with heparin is a dilemma. Objectives : To determine the incidence and nature of the HIT immune reaction in patients with APS and/or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods : Antibodies against PF4–heparin complex were assayed by particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA), or enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with or without an excess of heparin. EIA for PF4 alone was also performed. Functional assays for HIT, that is, heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) and heparin-induced platelet aggregation, were also performed. Results : In 32 of 42 patients (76.2%) with APS, APS and SLE, SLE, or SLE with antiphospholipid antibodies, EIA IgG or PaGIA for PF4–heparin complex antibodies were positive. Of these 32 samples, 26 (81.3%) tested positive for anti-PF4 antibodies. All 24 samples that were positive for PF4–heparin complex by EIA IgG were also positive for EIA IgG in the presence of heparin excess, and all were negative by the HIPA and heparin-induced platelet aggregation tests. Conclusion : A large proportion of patients with APS and/or SLE give false-positive HIT antigen test results that are presumably related to autoantibodies against PF4, which can be distinguished from true HIT antibodies by EIA for PF4–heparin complexes tested with heparin excess, and by functional assays.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: an autoimmune disorder regulated through dynamic autoantigen assembly/disassembly

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the most common drug‐induced, antibody‐mediated cause of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. HIT is caused by IgG antibodies that bind to epitopes on platelet factor 4 (PF4) released from activated platelets that develop when it forms complexes with heparin. Anti‐PF4/antibodies develop in over 50% of patients undergoing surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), an incidence 20‐fold higher than HIT. Why might this occur? Binding of HIT IgG occurs only over a narrow molar ratio of reactants, being optimal at 1 mol PF4 tetramer to 1 mol unfractionated heparin (UFH). At these ratios, PF4 and UFH form ultralarge (>670 kD) complexes that bind multiple IgG molecules/complex, are highly antigenic, and promote platelet activation. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), which is less antigenic, forms ultralarge complexes less efficiently and largely at supratherapeutic concentrations. In transgenic mice that vary in expression of human PF4 on their platelets, antigenic complexes form between PF4 and endogenous chondroitin sulfate. Binding of HIT IgG to platelets and induction of thrombocytopenia in vivo is proportional to PF4 expression. Heparin prolongs the duration and exacerbates the severity of the thrombocytopenia. High doses of heparin, as used in CPB, or protamine, which competes with PF4 for heparin, disrupts antigen formation and prevents thrombocytopenia induced by HIT antibody. These studies may help explain the disparity between the incidence of antibody formation and clinical disease and may help identify patients at risk for HIT (high platelet PF4). They also demonstrate that this autoimmune disease can be modulated at the level of autoantigen formation and point to rational means to intervene proximal to thrombin generation. J. Clin. Apheresis. 22:, 2007 © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

肝素／血小板因子4抗体与肝素诱导的血小板减少症

肝素诱导的血小板减少症（heparin—induced thrombocytopenia，HIT）是肝素治疗引起的严重并发症，可导致血栓形成和栓塞。HIT的发病机制主要与肝素／血小板因子4抗体介导的免疫反应有关，IgG类是主要的致病抗体，能与肝素和血小板因子4结合形成复合物，引起血小板凝集和凝血反应增强，同时抗体还通过作用于血管内皮细胞和单核细胞参与HIT的形成。抗体相关的实验室检测包括功能性血小板试验和免疫学试验，临床表现结合实验室检测有助于本病的早期诊断和治疗，但是在检测方面目前尚没有理想的方法。本文就AHPF4抗体、HIT发病机制、临床实验室检测和免疫学试验检测等问题进行了综述。     

Autoimmune heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

Summary

Autoimmune heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (aHIT) indicates the presence in patients of anti‐platelet factor 4 (PF4)–polyanion antibodies that are able to activate platelets strongly even in the absence of heparin (heparin‐independent platelet activation). Nevertheless, as seen with serum obtained from patients with otherwise typical heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), serum‐induced platelet activation is inhibited at high heparin concentrations (10–100 IU mL^?1 heparin). Furthermore, upon serial dilution, aHIT serum will usually show heparin‐dependent platelet activation. Clinical syndromes associated with aHIT include: delayed‐onset HIT, persisting HIT, spontaneous HIT syndrome, fondaparinux‐associated HIT, heparin ‘flush’‐induced HIT, and severe HIT (platelet count of < 20 × 10⁹ L^?1) with associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Recent studies have implicated anti‐PF4 antibodies that are able to bridge two PF4 tetramers even in the absence of heparin, probably facilitated by non‐heparin platelet‐associated polyanions (chondroitin sulfate and polyphosphates); nascent PF4–aHIT‐IgG complexes recruit additional heparin‐dependent HIT antibodies, leading to the formation of large multimolecular immune complexes and marked platelet activation. aHIT can persist for several weeks, and serial fibrin, D‐dimer, and fibrinogen levels, rather than the platelet count, may be helpful for monitoring treatment response. Although standard anticoagulant therapy for HIT ought to be effective, published experience indicates frequent failure of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)‐adjusted anticoagulants (argatroban, bivalirudin), probably because of underdosing in the setting of HIT‐associated DIC, known as ‘APTT confounding’. Thus, non‐APTT‐adjusted therapies with drugs such as danaparoid and fondaparinux, or even direct oral anticoagulants, such as rivaroxaban or apixaban, are suggested therapies, especially for long‐term management of persisting HIT. In addition, emerging data indicate that high‐dose intravenous immunoglobulin can interrupt HIT antibody‐induced platelet activation, leading to rapid platelet count recovery.

     

Testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) has a distinct clinical profile and unique pathogenesis. It is caused by platelet-activating IgG antibodies that recognize multimolecular complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin or certain other polyanions. Although an immune response to PF4/heparin associated with heparin treatment is very common, clinical HIT occurs only among the minority of patients whose antibodies are capable of strongly activating platelets. This explains why certain platelet activation assays and anti-PF4/polyanion immunoassays have high sensitivity for HIT and why diagnostic specificity is highest for those assays that preferentially detect pathogenic antibodies, such as the washed platelet activation assays or immunoassays that detect only IgG antibodies. Negative results obtained in a solid-phase PF4/polyanion immunoassay generally exclude HIT (high negative predictive value), especially in a setting of a low pretest probability. In addition, because the magnitude of a positive test result correlates with greater likelihood of HIT, a Bayesian diagnostic approach that combines pretest probability and the magnitude of a positive test result is recommended. Recent studies suggest that presence of anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies in certain clinical settings confers an adverse prognosis, even without clinically evident HIT. Whether such antibodies impart "forme fruste" HIT or are simply a surrogate marker for a non-HIT adverse risk factor such as inflammation is unresolved.     

Platelet and monocyte antigenic complexes in the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Summary.  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an iatrogenic disorder that occurs in a small subset of patients receiving heparin. Twenty-five per cent (or higher) of affected patients develop limb or life-threatening thrombosis. The effectiveness of therapy is incomplete and may be complicated by bleeding. HIT is caused by antibodies that recognize the platelet chemokine, Platelet Factor 4 (PF4), complexed to heparin or to cellular glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). However, antibodies with the same apparent specificity are found in many more patients without clinical disease and the reason why so few develop HIT is uncertain. We propose that HIT antibodies recognize cell surface PF4/GAG complexes on intravascular cells, including platelets and monocytes that are dynamic and mutable. Heparin removes cell surface-bound PF4 in most individuals, but removal is incomplete in those with high pre-exposure surface-bound PF4 levels. Such individuals retain critically localized cellular antigenic complexes at the time antibodies develop and are at risk to develop HIT. This article reviews the scientific basis for this model and its clinical implications.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia associated with collection of hematopoietic progenitor cells by apheresis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can occur following exposure to heparin and is characterized by thrombocytopenia with increased risk for thrombosis. This condition is mediated by formation of immunoglobulin G antibodies against platelet factor 4/heparin complexes that can subsequently lead to platelet activation. Herein, we detail the clinical and laboratory findings, treatments, and outcomes of two patients who developed HIT and thrombosis after undergoing collection of hematopoietic progenitor cells by apheresis (HPC-A) for autologous HPC transplant. Given that heparin may be used during HPC-A collections, these cases emphasize the importance of prompt consideration of HIT in patients that develop thrombocytopenia and thrombosis following HPC-A collection with heparin anticoagulation.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Summary.  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), typically occurring in the second week of heparin therapy, is an antibody-mediated adverse drug reaction associated with increased thrombotic risk. The most important antigens are located on platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes. All HIT is caused by platelet-activating antibodies, but not all PF4/heparin-reactive antibodies cause HIT. Thus, tests have high negative, but only moderate, positive predictive value. Cessation of heparin requires substitution with an alternative anticoagulant, but as these drugs have increased bleeding risk, they should be used in therapeutic doses only if HIT is considered very likely. Avoiding/postponing coumarin is crucial in minimizing microthrombotic complications. Recent studies of HIT immunobiology suggest that HIT mimics immunity against repetitive antigens, as they are relevant in microbial defense. Thus, understanding HIT may help unravel why host defenses can trigger autoimmunity.     

Intravenous immunoglobulin as an adjunct therapy in persisting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious adverse drug reaction caused by transient antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes, resulting in platelet activation and potentially fatal arterial and/or venous thrombosis. Most cases of HIT respond to cessation of heparin and administration of an alternative non-heparin anticoagulant, but there are cases of persisting HIT, defined as thrombocytopenia due to platelet activation/consumption for greater than seven days despite standard therapy. These patients remain at high risk for thrombotic events, which may result in limb-loss and mortality. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been proposed as an adjunct therapy for these refractory cases based on its ability to saturate FcγRIIa receptors on platelets, thus preventing HIT antibody binding and platelet activation. We describe 2 cases of persisting HIT (strongly positive antigen and functional assays, and persisting thrombocytopenia >7 days) with rapid clinical response to IVIg. We performed in-vitro experiments to support IVIg response. Healthy donor platelets (1?×?10e6) were treated with PF4 (3.75?μg/mL) for 20?min followed by 1-hour incubation with patients’ sera. Platelet activation with and without addition of IVIg (levels equivalent to those reached in a patient after treatment with 2?gm/Kg) was evaluated in the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA). A significantly decreased platelet activation was demonstrated after the addition of IVIg to both patient samples, which correlated well with the rapid clinical response that each patient experienced. Thus, our study supports the use of IVIg as an adjunct therapy for persisting HIT.     

Pseudo-pulmonary embolism as a sign of acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hemodialysis patients: safety of resuming heparin after disappearance of HIT antibodies

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a syndrome caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. Thrombocytopenia is the most common clinical feature of HIT. HIT can be considered as a hypercoagulable state, with a high risk of thrombosis. Another feature of HIT is an acute systemic reaction that characteristically begins 5-30 min after receiving an intravenous bolus of unfractionated heparin, such as is commonly given for hemodialysis (HD). Here we present 4 patients who developed acute HIT at or near the start of their chronic HD. All patients were anticoagulated with the low-molecular-weight heparin, nadroparin, for HD. Three of our patients underwent surgery approximately 1-2 weeks before developing HIT. All patients presented with an acute systemic reaction during HD. All patients were treated and further dialyzed with lepirudin. Under this treatment we observed a quick recovery of the platelet count, and patients remained symptom-free. Antibodies against the PF4-heparin complex were detected with a combination of a 'quick test' and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test. The likelihood of having HIT previous to the detection of antibodies was estimated with the pre-test probability score criteria. The tests for PF4-heparin antibodies remained positive for an average of 165 days. Three patients underwent a rechallenge with nadroparin after disappearance of the HIT antibodies in their serum. All 3 remained symptomless when they were further hemodialyzed on nadroparin. Our observations indicate that nadroparin can be successfully reintroduced for HD anticoagulation once the patient's HIT antibodies have disappeared.     

The use of flow cytometry in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) affects some of the patients exposed to heparin. It is mediated by antibodies that recognize neoepitopes on platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes. A HIT diagnosis requires both clinical and laboratory evaluation and remains a challenge. Since many patients develop antibodies in response to heparin, but only a few of them generate anti-PF4/heparin antibodies capable of activating platelets which consequently cause clinical complications, the performance of serologic assays is not enough to diagnose HIT. Functional assays can identify pathogenic antibodies capable of platelet activation, but they are more demanding and their limited availability contributes to the problem of diagnosing HIT. Restricted laboratories usually collect sera of multiple patients to perform functional assays only once or twice a week; hence, a HIT diagnosis can take several days. The use of flow cytometry appears to be a promising alternative in the confirmation of pathogenic anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. Flow cytometric assays detect either activation markers on a healthy donor’s platelet surfaces or platelet derived microparticles formed after platelet incubation with a patient’s serum. Flow cytometers are readily available in many clinical laboratories, so this technology introduces the possibility of an earlier HIT diagnosis. The objective of this review was to collect findings on flow cytometric HIT confirmations to the present date, and to review the currently available flow cytometric assays used in the diagnosis of HIT.     

Immune mechanisms in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: no evidence for immunoglobulin M anti-idiotype antibodies

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is caused by platelet (PLT)-activating immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes, differs from other immune responses seen in immunohematology: IgG antibodies are formed as early as 5 days even without previous heparin exposure; antibodies are remarkably transient (<100 days); HIT is more frequent in postsurgery patients compared with medical patients despite administering the same type and dose of heparin; and increasing evidence implicates autoantibody-like reactivity of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. We hypothesized that these unusual features could be caused by loss of regulatory anti-idiotype IgM antibodies due to disturbance (e.g., by surgery) of an idiotype–anti-idiotype network.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sera were obtained prospectively before heparin administration and during the immunization phase of HIT and also from patients with previous HIT after waning of antibodies to nondetectable levels. To detect inhibitory IgM anti-idiotype antibodies, we performed serum coincubation experiments and IgG purification by protein G and size filtration to exclude coprecipitating IgM. Sera (n = 3) containing known anti-PF4/heparin IgG or IgM antibodies and normal sera (n = 20) were processed as controls.
RESULTS: Fifteen preimmune response sera (seroconverting in the PF4/heparin-IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay only [n = 4] or additionally in a PLT activation assay [n = 5] or in both assays plus thrombosis [n = 6]) and four sera of previously immunized patients were included. Neither did the neat sera inhibit binding of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies nor did the purified IgG fractions show enhanced binding to PF4/heparin complexes.
CONCLUSION: The atypical immunologic features of HIT do not appear to be caused by disruption of an idiotype (IgG)–anti-idiotype (IgM) network.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A summary of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is presented. HIT is an adverse drug reaction characterized by thrombocytopenia and a high risk for venous or arterial thrombosis. The frequency of HIT ranges from 1 to 5% of patients receiving heparin with exact frequencies ranging between specific agents. Interestingly, this immune-mediated syndrome is ironically associated with thrombosis, not bleeding, with thrombin formation playing a major role. It is caused by heparin-dependent, platelet-activating antibodies that identifies a self-protein, PF4, bound to heparin that results in an antibody formation. The resulting platelet activation is associated with increased thrombin generation. Typically, the platelet count fall begins 5–10 days after starting heparin, although a rapid platelet count fall can occur in a patient who has antibodies from recent heparin use. Typical causes of HIT as well as the best diagnostic studies and treatment are discussed in this review. HIT was reviewed using a pubmed? search; google scholar? using key words: “Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia”; “heparin”, and “drug AND thrombocytopenia.”     

Use of plasma exchange in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a report of two cases and a review of the literature

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is characterized by thrombocytopenia and potentially serious thromboses, may develop in patients exposed to heparin anticoagulation. HIT is caused by antibodies to the heparin/platelet factor 4 (PF4) complex. Management of HIT involves discontinuation of heparin and anticoagulation with a nonheparin alternative such as a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI). This poses a challenge in the management of patients who need to undergo cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (CPB), because CPB requires anticoagulation with heparin and standardized protocols for use of DTIs are not widely available. We report two patients with HIT who underwent successful CPB with heparin anticoagulation following plasma exchange (PE) to reduce heparin/PF4 antibody titers. Case 1 is a 46-year-old male with cardiac amyloidosis who needed urgent placement of a left ventricular assist device. Case 2 is a 34-year-old woman with acute myocarditis who needed placement of a biventricular assist device. Both patients had positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay assays for heparin/PF4 antibodies and clinical evidence of HIT before PE. Following PE and subsequent CPB, neither patient had clinical or laboratory evidence of HIT. The literature regarding the use of PE for the treatment of complications of HIT and as prophylaxis before CPB is reviewed.     

Prothrombotic factors enhance heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in vivo in a mouse model

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis (HIT/T) is a common cause of life- and limb-threatening thrombosis. The development of antibodies that react with complexes of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4) is fundamental to the development of the disease. However, anti-PF4/heparin antibodies are far more common than is HIT/T and there is less understanding of the factors that contribute to thrombosis in only a subset of patients. OBJECTIVES: Both qualitative and quantitative differences in multiple factors (e.g. antibodies, heparin and platelets) may influence the clinical course of patients who develop anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. We examined the hypothesis that host-specific factors, such as comorbid prothrombotic conditions, would exacerbate the pathologic effects of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. METHODS AND RESULTS: A mouse model transgenic for human Fcgamma RIIa and PF4 and null for mouse PF4 was used to study the influence of prothrombotic conditions on the effects of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies in vivo. To simulate a prothrombotic milieu, mice were fed a hypercholesterolemic diet (HD). HD-fed mice had elevated plasma cholesterol, increased platelet reactivity and increased endothelial activation relative to mice fed a standard diet (SD). Age- and sex-matched mice from each diet group were treated with an anti-PF4/heparin antibody and heparin. HD-fed mice developed more severe thrombocytopenia than similarly treated SD-fed mice. Mice with moderate to severe thrombocytopenia had elevated plasma levels of thrombin-antithrombin complexes, indicative of increased thrombin generation in vivo. Platelet-fibrin thrombi were observed in multiple organs of HD-fed mice that developed severe thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Host-specific factors, such as prothrombotic changes in platelet reactivity and/or endothelial activation, may influence the development of thrombosis in a subset of patients who develop anti-PF4/heparin antibodies.