Modulation of glucuronidation of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, by valproic acid and phenobarbital

 Purpose: Irinotecan (CPT-11) is hydrolyzed to its active metabolite SN-38 which is subsequently conjugated by uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase (UDP-GT) to the glucuronide (SN-38G). Both preclinical and clinical data indicate that conjugation is a primary clearance mechanism for SN-38 with the plasma glucuronide levels being substantially higher than those of SN-38. This investigation was designed to determine the possibility of modulation of glucuronidation of SN-38 and its effect on the disposition of the parent drug and metabolites. Methods: Female Wistar rats were pretreated with 200 mg/kg valproic acid (VPA), an inhibitor of glucuronidation, 5 min prior to the administration of 20 mg/kg irinotecan. The control rats were given 20 mg/kg irinotecan only. To study the effect of inducers of UDP-GT activity, rats were pre- treated with phenobarbital (PB) before irinotecan administration. Results: Pretreatment with VPA caused a 99% inhibition in the formation of SN-38G leading to a 270% increase in the area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of SN-38 compared with the control rats. The irinotecan estimations were unchanged in the two groups. PB pretreatment caused a 1.7-fold increase in the AUC of SN-38G and a concomitant 31% and 59% reduction in the AUCs of SN-38 and irinotecan, respectively. Conclusions: The most plausible explanation for the alterations in SN-38G disposition is inhibition of SN-38 conjugation by VPA and induction of the conjugation by PB. Received: 5 February 1996 / Accepted: 30 July 1996     

Disposition of irinotecan and SN-38 following oral and intravenous irinotecan dosing in mice

The present study was conducted to quantitate the disposition of irinotecan lactone and its active metabolite SN-38 lactone in mice following oral and intravenous administration, and to evaluate the systemic exposure of irinotecan lactone and SN-38 lactone associated with antitumor doses of irinotecan lactone in mice bearing human tumor xenografts. Nontumor-bearing mice were given a single oral or intravenous irinotecan dose (5, 10, 40, or 75 mg/kg), and serial plasma samples were subsequently obtained. Irinotecan and SN-38 lactone plasma concentrations were measured using an isocratic HPLC assay with fluorescence detection. The disposition of intravenous irinotecan lactone was modeled using a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model, and the disposition of oral irinotecan and SN-38 lactone was modeled with noncompartmental methods. Irinotecan lactone showed biphasic plasma disposition following intravenous dosing with a terminal half-life ranging between 1.1 to 3 h. Irinotecan lactone disposition was linear at lower doses (5 and 10 mg/kg), but at 40 mg/kg irinotecan lactone clearance decreased and a nonlinear increase in irinotecan lactone AUC was observed. The steady-state volume of distribution ranged from 19.1 to 48.1 l/m². After oral dosing, peak irinotecan and SN-38 lactone concentrations occurred within 1 h, and the irinotecan lactone bioavailability was 0.12 at 10 mg/kg and 0.21 at 40 mg/kg. The percent unbound SN-38 lactone in murine plasma at 1000 ng/ml was 3.4 ± 0.67%, whereas at 100 ng/ml the percent unbound was 1.18 ± 0.14%. Irinotecan and SN-38 lactone AUCs in micebearing human neuroblastoma xenografts were greater than in nontumor-bearing animals. Systemic exposure to unbound SN-38 lactone in nontumor-bearing animals after a single oral irinotecan dose of 40, 10, and 5 mg/kg was 28.3, 8.6, and 2.9 ng h/ml, respectively. Data from the present study provide important information for the design of phase I studies of oral irinotecan. Received: 30 August 1996 / Accepted: 27 November 1996     

Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in pediatric cancer patients: a report from the children’s oncology group

Objective  To develop a population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its major metabolites in children with cancer and to identify covariates that predict variability in disposition. Methods  A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using plasma concentration data from 82 patients participating in a multicenter Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) single agent phase II clinical trial. Patients between 1 and 21 years of age with solid tumors refractory to standard therapy received irinotecan, 50 mg/m², as a 60-min intravenous infusion for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for irinotecan and three metabolites (SN-38, SN-38G, and APC). The population model was developed with NONMEM. Clearance and volume were scaled allometrically using corrected body weight. Exponential error models were used to describe the interindividual variance in pharmacokinetic parameters, and the residual error was described with a proportional model. Significant covariate effects were identified graphically using S-PLUS and were added to the base-model. The final model was evaluated by simulating data from two other POG trials. Results  The best structural model for irinotecan and its metabolites consisted of six-compartments: two compartments for irinotecan and SN-38, and one each for APC and SN-38G. Age and bilirubin were found to be significant covariates affecting SN-38 clearance. SN-38 clearance was greater in patients less than 10 years of age and lower in patients with a total serum bilirubin >0.6 mg/dL. Simulations revealed that the model was able to predict drug and metabolite exposure (AUC) for patients receiving the same or similar doses (30–65 mg/m²) of irinotecan. Conclusions  This population model accurately describes the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its primary metabolites. The model, which includes age and bilirubin as covariate effects on SN-38 clearance, is the first population model to describe the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its major metabolites in children. Supported in part by: NICHD 5 U10 HD037242-09, NIH M01 RR000188-43, NCI U01 CA57745, NCI U10 CA98453, NCRR M01 RR00188-37, The Mitchell Ross Children’s Cancer Fund, Pharmacia/Upjohn.     

Modulation of irinotecan metabolism by ketoconazole.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a prodrug of SN-38 and has been registered for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. It is converted by the cytochrome P450 3A4 isozyme (CYP3A4) into several inactive metabolites, including 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin (APC). To investigate the role of CYP3A4 in irinotecan pharmacology, we evaluated the consequences of simultaneous treatment of irinotecan with a potent enzyme inhibitor, ketoconazole, in a group of cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of seven assessable patients was treated in a randomized, cross-over design with irinotecan (350 mg/m(2) intravenously for 90 minutes) given alone and followed 3 weeks later by irinotecan (100 mg/m(2)) in combination with ketoconazole (200 mg orally for 2 days) or vice versa. Serial plasma, urine, and feces samples were obtained up to 500 hours after dosing and analyzed for irinotecan, metabolites (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin [SN-38], SN-38 glucuronide [SN-38G], and APC), and ketoconazole by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: With ketoconazole coadministration, the relative formation of APC was reduced by 87% (P =.002), whereas the relative exposure to the carboxylesterase-mediated SN-38 as expected on the basis of dose (area under the plasma concentration-time curve normalized to dose) was increased by 109% (P =.004). These metabolic alterations occurred without substantial changes in irinotecan clearance (P =.90) and formation of SN-38G (P =.93). CONCLUSION: Inhibition of CYP3A4 in cancer patients treated with irinotecan leads to significantly increased formation of SN-38. Simultaneous administration of various commonly prescribed inhibitors of CYP3A4 can potentially result in fatal outcomes, and up to four-fold reductions in irinotecan dose are indicated.     

Salivary drug monitoring of irinotecan and its active metabolite in cancer patients

 To assess the clinical usefulness of salivary monitoring of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its active metabolite (SN-38), we examined the clinical pharmacological profile of both drugs in 9 patients with thoracic malignancies who received 60 mg/m² CPT-11 (21 courses). Plasma and unstimulated whole saliva were collected over a 24-h period, and concentrations of CPT-11 and SN-38 were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Both CPT-11 and SN-38 were detectable in saliva, and the concentration-time curves in plasma and saliva showed a very similar pattern. A good correlation was observed between the saliva concentration (C_s) and the plasma concentration (C_p) for both CPT-11 and SN-38 (r=0.732, P<0.0001 and r = 0.611, P<0.0001, respectively). The area under the concentration-time curve calculated for saliva (AUC_s) correlated with that generated for plasma (AUC_p) for both CPT-11 and SN-38 (r = 0.531, P = 0.012 and r = 0.611, P = 0.0025, respectively). These results suggest that it may be feasible to use saliva instead of plasma for pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics studies of CPT-11. Received: 13 July 1996 / Accepted: 15 December 1996     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of UCN-01 in combination with irinotecan in patients with solid tumors

Purpose 7-Hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) is a protein kinase inhibitor that inhibits several serine–threonine kinases including PKC and PDK1. Due to the preclinical synergistic effects seen with topoisomerase I inhibitors and non-overlapping toxicity, UCN-01 and irinotecan were combined in a dose-finding study designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of UCN-01 and irinotecan. Methods Patients with incurable solid malignancies received UCN-01 intravenously (IV) as a 3-h infusion on day 1 and irinotecan IV over 90 min on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Doses of UCN-01 for subsequent cycles were half the starting dose. Dose level 1 (DL1) consisted of UCN-01 and irinotecan doses of 50 and 60 mg/m², respectively. Blood samples were collected in cycle 1 for UCN-01, irinotecan, and irinotecan metabolites. Results A total of 16 patients were enrolled on the trial at UCN-01/Irinotecan doses of 50/60 mg/m² (DL1; n = 1), 70/60 mg/m² (DL2; n = 6), 90/60 mg/m² (DL3; n = 4), and 70/90 mg/m² (DL4; n = 5). Two dose-limiting toxicities were observed each in DL3 and DL4 (2 grade 3 hypophosphatemia, 1 grade 4 hyperglycemia and grade 3 hypophosphatemia, 1 grade 4 febrile neutropenia). Fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, and anorexia were the most prevalent toxicities. No objective responses were documented, and four patients had stable disease for at least ten cycles. The long half-life (292.0 ± 135.7 h), low clearance (0.045 ± 0.038 l/h), and volume of distribution (14.3 ± 5.9 l) observed for UCN-01 are consistent with prior UCN-01 data. There was a significant decrease in C _max of APC, AUC of APC and SN-38, and AUC ratio of SN-38:irinotecan when comparing days 1 and 8 PK. Conclusions APC and SN-38 exposure decreased when administered in combination with UCN-01. The MTD of the combination based on protocol criteria was defined as 70 mg/m² of UCN-01 on day 1 and 60 mg/m² of irinotecan on days 1 and 8 in a 21-day cycle. Presented in part at the 16th EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics, September 2004.     

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of a powder-filled capsule formulation of oral irinotecan (CPT-11) given daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose: Intravenous (i.v.) irinotecan is a cytotoxic topoisomerase I inhibitor with broad clinical activity in metastatic colorectal cancer and other tumors. The development of an oral formulation of irinotecan could enhance convenience and lessen the expense of palliative irinotecan delivery. This phase I study evaluated the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of irinotecan given as a powder-filled capsule (PFC) daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. Patients and methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating doses of oral irinotecan daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. Plasma samples were collected following the first and fifth doses of irinotecan during Cycle 1 to determine the PK of irinotecan and its major circulating metabolites: SN-38, SN-38G, and APC. Results: 20 patients (median age 61.5 years, range 40–75; M/F 12/8; ECOG PS 0=5, 1=11, 2=4) received oral irinotecan at dose levels of 30 (n=3), 40 (n=3), 50 (n=6), and 60 (n=8) mg/m²/day. Of the eight patients enrolled at 60 mg/m², three patients experienced DLT (≥ grade 3) consisting of nausea (three patients), vomiting (three patients), diarrhea (two patients), and febrile neutropenia (two patients) for which all the three patients required hospitalization. Treatment of six patients at the 50-mg/m² dose level resulted in no DLT. Other toxicities observed include abdominal pain, alopecia, anorexia, and asthenia. After oral administration, irinotecan was rapidly absorbed into systemic circulation and converted to the active metabolite SN-38. Increasing dose levels resulted in a dose-dependent increase in mean exposure parameters (Cmax and AUC) of irinotecan and metabolites. Systemic exposure parameters (Cmax and AUC_0-24) of irinotecan and SN-38 were comparable between days 1 and 5. The extent of conversion from irinotecan to SN-38 was approximately threefold higher after the oral administration compared to that previously observed after i.v. administration. The exposure parameters of irinotecan or SN-38 are of limited value in predicting severity of Cycle 1 toxicities in the twofold dose range evaluated. Conclusion: Daily oral administration of irinotecan as the PFC formulation for 5 days every 3 weeks can safely deliver protracted exposure to SN-38, with the MTD of 50 mg/m²/d.Supported in part by Pharmacia and National Cancer Institute Grants U01-CA69912, M01-RR00585, and CA15083-26     

Pharmacokinetic, metabolic, and pharmacodynamic profiles in a dose-escalating study of irinotecan and cisplatin.

PURPOSE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan and cisplatin administered once every 3 weeks in a dose-escalating study in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two cancer patients were treated with irinotecan administered as a 90-minute infusion at doses ranging from 175 to 300 mg/m(2) followed by cisplatin administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion at doses ranging from 60 to 80 mg/m(2). After reaching the maximum-tolerated dose, the sequence of drug administration was revised. For pharmacokinetic analysis, serial plasma samples were obtained on days 1 through 3 of the first cycle. Forty-five patients were assessable for irinotecan pharmacokinetics, and 46 were assessable for cisplatin pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Irinotecan and cisplatin demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics comparable to that observed with single-agent administration, which suggests an absence of pharmacokinetic interaction. SN-38G constituted the major plasma metabolite of irinotecan, whereas 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(1-piperidino)1-amino]-carbonyloxycamptothecine (NPC) was only a minor metabolite in plasma, possibly indicating a rapid conversion of NPC to SN-38. The terminal elimination phases of SN-38 and SN-38G were similar and relatively delayed when compared with the elimination of irinotecan. Maximal DNA adduct formation did not significantly differ from that observed with single-agent administration. The percentage decrease in WBC was significantly related to the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCs) of the lactone form of irinotecan (P =.0245) and SN-38 (P =. 0123). The severity of diarrhea was not significantly related to the AUCs of irinotecan and SN-38, nor to the systemic glucuronidation rate of SN-38. CONCLUSION: There was no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction between irinotecan and cisplatin in this study. Reversion of the administration sequence of the drugs did not seem to have any influence on the pharmacokinetics. The incidence and severity of delayed-type diarrhea was not related to any of the studied parameters.     

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic determinants of the activity and toxicity of irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer patients

This study aims at establishing relationships between genetic and non-genetic factors of variation of the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites; and also at establishing relationships between the pharmacokinetic or metabolic parameters and the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan. We included 49 patients treated for metastatic colorectal cancer with a combination of 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan; a polymorphism in the UGT1A1 gene (TA repeat in the TATA box) and one in the CES2 gene promoter (830C>G) were studied as potential markers for SN-38 glucuronidation and irinotecan activation, respectively; and the potential activity of CYP3A4 was estimated from cortisol biotransformation into 6beta-hydroxycortisol. No pharmacokinetic parameter was directly predictive of clinical outcome or toxicity. The AUCs of three important metabolites of irinotecan, SN-38, SN-38 glucuronide and APC, were tentatively correlated with patients' pretreatment biological parameters related to drug metabolism (plasma creatinine, bilirubin and liver enzymes, and blood leukocytes). SN-38 AUC was significantly correlated with blood leukocytes number and SN-38G AUC was significantly correlated with plasma creatinine, whereas APC AUC was significantly correlated with plasma liver enzymes. The relative extent of irinotecan activation was inversely correlated with SN-38 glucuronidation. The TATA box polymorphism of UGT1A1 was significantly associated with plasma bilirubin levels and behaved as a significant predictor for neutropoenia. The level of cortisol 6beta-hydroxylation predicted for the occurrence of diarrhoea. All these observations may improve the routine use of irinotecan in colorectal cancer patients. UGT1A1 genotyping plus cortisol 6beta-hydroxylation determination could help to determine the optimal dose of irinotecan.     

Irinotecan in combination with thalidomide in patients with advanced solid tumors: a clinical study with pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation

Purpose: Recent clinical studies have demonstrated a reduction of irinotecan (CPT-11) gastrointestinal toxicities when the CPT-11 is administered in combination with thalidomide in patients with diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The main purpose of this study was to investigate possible interactions between CPT-11 pharmacokinetics and thalidomide to explain the previously described gastrointestinal toxicity reduction. Methods: In our clinical trial, advanced cancer patients were treated with CPT-11 on a dose of 350 mg/m² at day 1 every 3 weeks. Only at the first cycle, CPT-11 was administered in association with thalidomide on a dose of 400 mg/day given from day 1 to day 14. From the second cycle, the treatment was continued with irinotecan alone at the same dose. Pharmacokinetics analysis of irinotecan and its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38-glucuronide, were performed at the first and second cycle. Results: A total of 19 patients entered the study. The pharmacokinetic analysis were performed on 16 patients. Pharmacokinetic data suggested a decreased metabolism of irinotecan into SN-38 and SN-38-glucuronide when it was administered with thalidomide. Indeed, area under the time–concentration curve (AUC) of SN-38 was significantly lower at the first cycle than the second cycle (0.99±0.45 h×μg/ml vs 1.34±0.65, respectively, P=0.027) whereas AUC of irinotecan and SN-38-glucuronide were higher at first cycle than second cycle (34.53±11.38 h×μg/ml vs. 28.42±12.23 h×μg/ml, P=0.064 and 2.39±1.21 h(μg/ml vs. 1.86±1.11 h×μg/ml, P=0.018, respectively). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a significant decreased metabolism of CPT-11 into the active metabolite SN-38 when CPT-11 is administered in association with thalidomide. These observations strongly suggest an interaction of thalidomide with CPT-11 metabolism and, at least in part, it might explain the previously described improvement in tolerability.Grant support: The work was partially supported by Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro (AIRC) and Fondazione A.R.C.O.     

Enterohepatic recirculation model of irinotecan (CPT-11) and metabolite pharmacokinetics in patients with glioma

Background  Enterohepatic recirculation of irinotecan and one of its metabolites, SN-38, has been observed in pharmacokinetic data sets from previous studies. A mathematical model that can incorporate this phenomenon was developed to describe the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites. Patients and methods  A total of 32 patients with recurrent malignant glioma were treated with weekly intravenous administration of irinotecan at a dose of 125 mg/m². Plasma concentrations of irinotecan and its three major metabolites were determined. Pharmacokinetic models were developed and tested for simultaneous fit of parent drug and metabolites, including a recirculation component. Results  Rebound in the plasma concentration suggestive of enterohepatic recirculation at approximately 0.5–1 h post-infusion was observed in most irinotecan plasma concentration profiles, and in some plasma profiles of the SN-38 metabolite. A multi-compartment model containing a recirculation chain was developed to describe this process. The recirculation model was optimal in 22 of the 32 patients compared to the traditional model without the recirculation component. Conclusion  A recirculation chain incorporated in a multi-compartment pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its metabolites appears to improve characterization of this drug’s disposition in patients with glioma.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites: a population analysis.

PURPOSE: To build population pharmacokinetic (PK) models for irinotecan (CPT-11) and its currently identified metabolites. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy cancer patients (24 women and 46 men) received 90-minute intravenous infusions of CPT-11 in the dose range of 175 to 300 mg/m(2). The PK models were developed to describe plasma concentration profiles of the lactone and carboxylate forms of CPT-11 and 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) and the total forms of SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G), 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin (APC), and 7-ethyl-10-[4-amino-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin (NPC) by using NONMEM. RESULTS: The interconversion between the lactone and carboxylate forms of CPT-11 was relatively rapid, with an equilibration half-life of 14 minutes in the central compartment and hydrolysis occurring at a rate five times faster than lactonization. The same interconversion also occurred in peripheral compartments. CPT-11 lactone had extensive tissue distribution (steady-state volume of distribution [Vss], 445 L) compared with the carboxylate form (Vss, 78 L, excluding peripherally formed CPT-11 carboxylate). Clearance (CL) was higher for the lactone form (74.3 L/h) compared with the carboxylate form (12.3 L/h). During metabolite data modeling, goodness of fit indicated a preference of SN-38 and NPC to be formed out of the lactone form of CPT-11, whereas APC could be modeled best by presuming formation from CPT-11 carboxylate. The interconversion between SN-38 lactone and carboxylate was slower than that of CPT-11, with the lactone form dominating at equilibrium. The CLs for SN-38 lactone and carboxylate were similar, but the lactone form had more extensive tissue distribution. CONCLUSION: Plasma data of CPT-11 and metabolites could be adequately described by this compartmental model, which may be useful in predicting the time courses, including interindividual variability, of all characterized substances after intravenous administrations of CPT-11.     

Inhibition of intestinal microflora β-glucuronidase modifies the distribution of the active metabolite of the antitumor agent, irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in rats

Purpose: SN-38, a metabolite of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11), is considered to play a key role in the development of diarrhea as well as in the antitumor activity of CPT-11. We have previously found that the inhibition of β-glucuronidase, which hydrolyzes detoxified SN-38 (SN-38 glucuronide) to reform SN-38, in the lumen by eliminating the intestinal microflora with antibiotics, markedly ameliorates the intestinal toxicity of CPT-11 in rats. In this study we compared the disposition of CPT-11 and its metabolites in rats treated with and without antibiotics. Methods: Rats were given drinking water containing 1 mg/ml penicillin and 2 mg/ml streptomycin from 5 days before the administration of CPT-11 (60 mg/kg i.v.) and throughout the experiment. CPT-11, SN-38 glucuronide and SN-38 concentrations in the blood, intestinal tissues and intestinal luminal contents were determined by HPLC. Results: Antibiotics had little or no effect on the pharmacokinetics of CPT-11, SN-38 glucuronide or SN-38 in the blood, or in the tissues or contents of the small intestine, which has less β-glucuronidase activity in its luminal contents. In contrast, antibiotics markedly reduced the AUC_1–24 h of SN-38 (by about 85%) in the large intestine tissue without changing that of CPT-11, and this was accompanied by a complete inhibition of the deconjugation of SN-38 glucuronide in the luminal contents. Conclusions: These results suggest that SN-38, which results from the hydrolysis of SN-38 glucuronide by β-glucuronidase in the intestinal microflora, contributes considerably to the distribution of SN-38 in the large intestine tissue, and that inhibition of the β-glucuronidase activity by antibiotics results in decreased accumulation of SN-38 in the large intestine. Received: 8 August 1997 / Accepted: 16 January 1998     

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC), irinotecan (CPT-11), and SN-38 in nonhuman primates

Purpose: The plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics of the camptothecin analogs, 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC) and irinotecan, were studied in a nonhuman primate model to determine their CSF penetration. Methods: 9-AC, 0.2 mg/kg (4 mg/m²) or 0.5 mg/kg (10 mg/m²), was infused intravenously over 15 min and irinotecan, 4.8 mg/kg (96 mg/m²) or 11.6 mg/kg (225 mg/m²), was infused over 30 min. Plasma and CSF samples were obtained at frequent intervals over 24 h. Lactone and total drug forms of 9-AC, irinotecan, and the active metabolite of irinotecan, SN-38, were quantified by reverse-phase HPLC. Results: 9-AC lactone had a clearance (CL) of 2.1 ± 0.9 l/kg per h, a volume of distribution at steady state (Vd_ss) of 1.6 ± 0.7 l/kg and a half-life (t_1/2) of 3.2 ± 0.8 h. The lactone form of 9-AC accounted for 26 ± 7% of the total drug in plasma. The CSF penetration of 9-AC lactone was limited. CSF 9-AC lactone concentration peaked 30 to 45 min after the dose at 11 to 21 nM (0.5 mg/kg dose), and the ratio of the areas under the CSF and plasma concentration-time curves (AUC^CSF: AUC^P) was only 3.5 ± 2.1%. For irinotecan, the CL was 3.4 ± 0.4 l/kg per h, the Vd_ss was 7.1 ± 1.3 l/kg, and the t_1/2 was 4.9 ± 2.2 h. Plasma AUCs of the lactone form of SN-38 were only 2.0% to 2.4% of the AUCs of irinotecan lactone. The lactone form of irinotecan accounted for 26 ± 5% of the total drug in plasma, and the lactone form of SN-38 accounted for 55 ± 6% of the total SN-38 in plasma. The AUC^CSF: AUC^P ratio for irinotecan lactone was 14 ± 3%. SN-38 lactone and carboxylate could not be measured (<1.0 nM ) in CSF. The AUC^CSF: AUC^P ratio for SN-38 lactone was estimated to be ≤ 8%. Conclusion: Despite their structural similarity, the CSF penetration of 9-AC and SN-38 is substantially less than that of topotecan which we previously found to have an AUC^CSF: AUC^P ratio of 32%. Received: 15 July 1997 / Accepted: 8 October 1997     

Hepatic transport, metabolism and biliary excretion of irinotecan in a cancer patient with an external bile drain

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan is metabolized by various enzymes, including carboxylesterases, cytochrome P450 3A isozymes (CYP3A) and uridine-diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A isoforms (UGT1A). Here we report on the disposition of irinotecan and its metabolites in plasma, urine, bile and feces of a single cancer patient with an external bile drain. METHODOLOGY: Irinotecan (450 mg) was administered during a 90-minutes continuous infusion to a cancer patient with an external bile drain. Blood samples were collected up to 55 hours after infusion, while bile, feces and urine were collected during six consecutive days after administration. Samples were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-assays with fluorescence detection. RESULTS: Plasma pharmacokinetics were characterized by a relatively slow clearance of irinotecan and a relatively high exposure to 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino] carbonyloxycamptothecin (APC). Exposures to the other metabolites was within the normal range. Overall, 83.4% of the administered dose was recovered in the excreta, with the majority excreted during the first 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Enterohepatic recirculation is of minor importance for the plasma disposition of irinotecan and its metabolites. The high percentage of the dose recovered in urine, the relatively slow clearance of irinotecan and the preferential urinary over biliary excretion of APC in this particular patient are likely related to reduced functioning of ABC-transporters. Circumstantial evidence was found that APC is subject to further intestinal biotransformation indicating a role in the etiology of irinotecan-induced diarrhea. Since intra-luminal exposure to SN-38 in patients with an external bile drain is limited, neutropenia will be the dose-limiting toxicity. Based on presented data, although collected from only one patient, irinotecan therapy in patients with an external bile drain is feasible. No a priori dose adjustments are recommended, although in the absence of severe side-effects in previous courses, a higher dose may be considered.     

Multicentre phase II study and pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan in chemotherapy-na?ve patients with glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: To assess the antitumour activity and safety profile of irinotecan and its pharmacokinetic interactions with anticonvulsants in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicentre phase II and pharmacokinetic study investigated the effects of irinotecan 350 mg/m(2) given as a 90-min infusion every 3 weeks either prior to (group A) or after relapse following radiotherapy (group B) in chemotherapy-na?ve patients with glioblastoma. Preferred concomitant medication for seizure prevention was valproic acid. Pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan and its main metabolites (SN-38, SN-38-G, APC and NPC) was performed during cycle 1. An independent panel of experts reviewed the activity data. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (25 patients in group A and 27 patients in group B) received a total of 191 cycles of irinotecan. Forty-six patients (22 patients in group A and 24 patients in group B) were evaluable and externally reviewed for activity. According to external review, one partial response (group B), seven minor responses (three in group A and four in group B), 12 disease stabilisations (seven in group A and five in group B) were observed. This resulted in an overall response rate of only 2.2% (95% confidence interval 0.2% to 6.5%). The median time to tumour progression was 9 weeks in group A and 14.4 weeks in group B. Six-month progression-free survival rates were 26% in group A and 43% in group B. Grade 3-4 toxicities (percentage of patients in groups A and B) consisted of neutropenia (12.5% and 25.9%), diarrhoea (8.3% and 7.4%), asthenia (12.5% and 7.4%) and vomiting (0% and 7.4%). The clearance of irinotecan was 12.4 and 14.4 l/h/m(2) in two patients who received no anticonvulsant. In patients receiving valproic acid, the clearance of irinotecan was 17.2 +/- 4.4 l/h/m(2). CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan given at the dose of 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks has limited clinical activity as a single agent in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma after radiotherapy. The toxicity profile and plasma disposition of irinotecan and SN-38 were not strongly influenced by anticonvulsant valproic acid therapy. Although the response rate of irinotecan as a single agent was limited, it remains an attractive drug for combination studies in patients with glioblastoma.     

Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites SN-38 and APC in children with recurrent solid tumors after protracted low-dose irinotecan.

Irinotecan (IRN), a topoisomerase I interactive agent, has significant antitumor activity in early Phase I studies in children with recurrent solid tumors. However, the disposition of IRN and its metabolites, SN-38 and APC, in children has not been reported. Children with solid tumors refractory to conventional therapy received IRN by a 1-h i.v. infusion at either 20, 24, or 29 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days for 2 weeks. Serial blood samples were collected after doses 1 and 10 of the first course. IRN, SN-38, and APC lactone concentrations were determined by an isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography assay. A linear four-compartment model was fit simultaneously to the IRN, SN-38, and APC plasma concentration versus time data. Systemic clearance rate for IRN was 58.7 +/- 18.8 liters/h/m2 (mean +/- SD). The mean +/- SD ng/ml x h single-day lactone SN-38 area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-->6) was 90.9 +/- 96.4, 103.7 +/- 62.4, and 95.3 +/- 63.9 at IRN doses of 20, 24, and 29 mg/m2, respectively. The relative extent of IRN conversion to SN-38 and metabolism to APC measured after dose 1 were 0.49 +/- 0.33 and 0.29 +/- 0.17 (mean +/- SD). No statistically significant intrapatient difference was noted for SN-38 area under the concentration-time curve. Large interpatient variability in IRN and metabolite disposition was observed. The relative extent of conversion and the SN-38 systemic exposure achieved with this protracted schedule of administration were much greater than reported in adults or children receiving larger intermittent doses.     

A pilot study on the safety of combining chrysin, a non-absorbable inducer of UGT1A1, and irinotecan (CPT-11) to treat metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose: Recently, it was shown that chrysin causes upregulation of UGT1A1 in Caco-2 intestinal cells. Therefore, we proposed that oral chrysin may reduce irinotecan (CPT-11) induced diarrhoea by shifting the SN-38G/SN-38 equilibrium towards the inactive SN-38G in the gastrointestinal mucosa. The purpose of this study was to examine the safety of combining single agent CPT-11 with chrysin. Patients and methods: Twenty patients with previously treated advanced colorectal cancer were administered chrysin twice daily for 1 week preceding and succeeding treatment with single agent CPT-11 (350 mg/m² over 90 min every 3 weeks). Loperamide usage and bowel frequency/consistency were recorded by patients into a study diary and blood samples were collected for CPT-11 pharmacokinetic analysis. Results: There were no observable toxicities that could be attributed to chrysin use. The grades and frequency of delayed diarrhoea were mild, with only 10% of patients experiencing grade 3 toxicity. Loperamide usage was also modest with a median of 1–5 tablets per cycle (range: 0–22). Pharmacokinetic results revealed a mass ratio of plasma SN-38G/SN-38, which was very similar to historical controls (7.15±5.67, n=18). Conclusions: These findings, combined with the observation of clinical activity and grade 3/4 neutropenia in 25% of patients, suggest that combining chrysin with CPT-11 may be a safe and potentially useful means of preventing diarrhoea, although this needs to be further investigated in the setting of a randomised trial.     

Activation and antitumor activity of CPT-11 in plasma esterase-deficient mice

Purpose: To examine the antitumor activity and the pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 (irinotecan, 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino] carbonyloxycamptothecin) in a plasma esterase-deficient scid mouse model, bearing human tumor xenografts. Experimental design: Plasma carboxylesterase (CE)-deficient mice were bred with scid animals to develop a strain that would allow growth of human tumor xenografts. Following xenotransplantation, the effect of the plasma esterase on antitumor activity following CPT-11 administration was assessed. In addition, detailed pharmacokinetic studies examining plasma and biliary disposition of CPT-11 and its metabolites were performed. Results: In mice lacking plasma carboxylesterase, the mean SN-38 systemic exposures were approximately fourfold less than that observed in control animals. Consistent with the pharmacokinetic data, four to fivefold more CPT-11 was required to induce regressions in human Rh30 xenografts grown in esterase-deficient scid mice, as opposed to those grown in scid animals. Additionally, the route of elimination of CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) was principally in the bile. Conclusions: The pharmacokinetic profile for CPT-11 and its metabolites in the esterase-deficient mice more closely reflects that seen in humans. Hence, these mice may represent a more accurate model for antitumor studies with this drug and other agents metabolized by CEs.     

In vitro conversion of irinotecan to SN-38 in human plasma

Irinotecan is an active cytotoxic agent for various cancers, and is converted to SN-38, its most active metabolite, by carboxylesterase converting enzyme (CCE) in vivo. Although the primary metabolic site is in the liver, ex vivo studies have proven that irinotecan is also converted to SN-38 in intestines, plasma and tumor tissues. The present study attempted to elucidate the in vitro conversion efficiency in human plasma, and to examine possible inter-individual variability and its clinical significance. Plasma samples were taken from 57 patients with lung cancer, 3 patients with benign pulmonary diseases and 9 healthy volunteers. After addition of 157 mM irinotecan to plasma, time courses of SN-38 concentration, measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), were investigated. All subjects showed linear increase in SN-38 concentration during the first 60-min period, followed by a plateau. Mean and standard deviation of the conversion rate in the first 60 min were 515.9 +/- 50.1 pmol/ml/h (n = 69), with a coefficient of variation of 0.097. Although most of the subjects showed comparable conversion rates, 3 subjects had significantly higher conversion rates. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that the enzyme activity of CCE in human plasma may show inter-individual variability.