A phase I study of sequential vinorelbine followed by paclitaxel

Background: In vitro experiments suggest that administration of vinorelbine preceding paclitaxel results in synergistic cytotoxic effects. A phase I dose escalation trial of vinorelbine daily × 3 with paclitaxel on day 3 repeated every 28 days in metastatic breast cancer patients was completed.Patients and methods: Female patients, PS 0–2, without evidence of CNS disease or prior neuropathies were treated with vinorelbine at dose levels 7, 10, 13 mg/m² per day and paclitaxel over three hours at dose levels of 135, 175, and 200 mg/m².Results: Twenty-eight patients with six dose levels were studied. At dose level 1, patients developed intolerable but reversible neutropenia. Subsequent dose levels required filgrastim. Dose limiting toxicities were myalgia and fatigue at vinorelbine 13 mg/m² /day and paclitaxel 200 mg/m². Neuropathy was minor. Twelve of twenty-five patients with measurable disease had a rapid response which did not correlate with dose level.Conclusions: Sequential administration of these two agents demonstrates activity in breast cancer patients. Phase II dosing on this schedule should be vinorelbine 13 mg/m²/day × 3 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m². With proper selection of patients, concern about neurologic toxicity should not impede future trials of vinorelbine with paclitaxel.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of D-verapamil and doxorubicin.

The calcium antagonist verapamil (a mixture of D- and L-racemers) is a potent modulator of the multi-drug resistance phenotype in vitro at a concentration of 6 microM. Clinical studies have shown dose-limiting toxicity of hypotension and heart block when plasma levels approach the concentrations active in vitro. Previous data indicate that the D-isomer is less cardioactive than the L-isomer but they appear to be equipotent in reversing drug resistance in vitro. In an attempt to increase plasma verapamil concentrations, we have treated ten patients (total of 27 courses) with oral D-verapamil (DVPM), 150-300 mg 6 h, and doxorubicin i.v. 70 mg m2 q 3 weeks. Hypotension (supine systolic BP less than 100 mmHg or a fall in systolic BP of greater than 30 mmHg) occurred in 5/6 patients at 1200 mg day DVPM, in 1/5 at 800 mg day, and in 1/5 at 600 mg day. PQ prolongation (greater than 0.23 s) was demonstrated in 2/5 patients at 800 mg day DVPM. Plasma levels of DVPM and its active metabolite norverapamil were measured and, combining these, levels of 3-4 microM were achieved at 1200 mg day DVPM; however this dose is likely to lead to unacceptable toxicity in the outpatient setting. Using an oral outpatient schedule of administration, an appropriate dose of DVPM is 800 mg day. This provides a combined plasma level (for VPM and DVPM) of 2-3 microM. If DVPM is to prove useful as a resistance modulator, it may require to be administered intravenously with careful inpatient monitoring and support.     

Phase I/II study of paclitaxel and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer

Paclitaxel and vinorelbine are among the most active new agents in metastatic breast cancer. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that the combined administration of these two microtubule-targeting agents is feasible and worthwhile. Based on the promising preclinical data, patients with metastatic breast cancer no longer amenable to conventional treatment were entered into a phase I/II study in which the vinorelbine dose was fixed at 30 mg/sqm and paclitaxel was started at 90 mg/sqm and then subsequently escalated by 30 mg/sqm per step. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Hematopoietic growth factor support was provided from the 4th dose level onwards. Grade III neutropenia was observed only in 2 patients treated at the 5th dose level. Thrombocytopenia never reached grade 3. Neurotoxicity was considered dose-limiting, since grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occured in all three patients treated at the 6th dose level. Other toxicities were mild. Paclitaxel 210 mg/sqm and vinorelbine 30 mg/sqm was the selected combination for phase II. Overall response rate in 34 evaluable patients was 38% (95% confidence interval (C.I.), 22% to 54%). In particular, 3 complete responses (9%) and 10 partial responses (29%) were observed. The observed level of antitumor activity, with an overall response rate of 38% and a median duration of response of 12 months, is of interest, since the study was targeted only to anthracycline-pretreated patients, most of whom had adverse prognostic features. The evaluation of a combination of vinorelbine and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer seems worthwhile and is currently undergoing.     

A pilot study on risk factors and p53 gene expression in colorectal cancer.

Of 311 colorectal cancers diagnosed in 1984-86 in the county of Ostergotland, Sweden, 179 were included in a case-control study, and, of these, 70 were investigated using immunohistochemical staining for p53 gene mutations. Alcohol use as well as medication with hydralazine-containing antihypertensive drugs, but not heredity were associated with p53 staining. The study is offered to illustrate the possible value of investigating molecularly defined tumour subtypes in relation to specific risk factors.     

Phase I/II study of capecitabine and vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of the combination of capecitabine and vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer who relapse after adjuvant and/or first-line treatment. In addition, we aimed to obtain data on efficacy and safety at the recommended dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable metastatic breast cancer after failure of prior chemotherapy (including anthracyclines and/or taxanes) were eligible. Capecitabine was administered with a fixed dose of 1000 mg/m(2) orally twice daily for 2 weeks followed by 1 week rest. One treatment cycle consisted of 6 weeks of treatment containing two treatment periods of capecitabine. Vinorelbine was given intravenously at escalated doses of 25 mg/m(2) (dose level 1) and 30 mg/m(2) (dose level 2) on days 1 and 8, and 22 and 29. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received a total of 91 cycles of capecitabine and vinorelbine. The median number of administered cycles per patient was three (range one to six). Thirty-one patients were evaluable for toxicity. At dose level 2 four out of seven patients experienced DLTs (nausea/vomiting, febrile neutropenia, grade 4 neutropenia, infection and diarrhea); thus, the MTD was defined. In order to confirm the safety and efficacy, dose level 1 was extended to 24 patients. Two patients [8.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1% to 27%] showed DLTs (hospitalization due to febrile neutropenia and prolonged neutropenia). The main toxicity was neutropenia, which was observed at National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 and 4 in 39% of patients. The overall response rate for capecitabine and vinorelbine was 55% (95% CI 36% to 72.7%), including three patients with a complete remission. The median time to disease progression was 8 months (95% CI 4.3-11.7) with an overall survival of 19.2 months (95% CI 11.3-27.1) based on intention-to-treat analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of capecitabine and vinorelbine can be administered with manageable toxicity and showed significant efficacy for patients with metastatic breast cancer even after failure of a anthracycline- and/or taxane-based therapy.     

Phase I study of vinorelbine and paclitaxel in small-cell lung cancer

Background: Vinorelbine and paclitaxel interfere with mitotic spindle function through different mechanisms of action. Both of the drugs show antitumor activity in small-cell lung cancer when used as single agents; furthermore, in vitro and in vivo studies have shown a synergistic activity between the two drugs. Patients and methods: Patients with small-cell lung cancer no longer amenable to conventional treatment were entered into a phase I study in which vinorelbine was given at a fixed dose of 30 mg/m² by 15-min intravenous infusion, whereas paclitaxel was given by 3-h infusion starting 1 h after vinorelbine at an initial dose of 90 mg/m², which was subsequently escalated by 30-mg/m² steps. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Results: Grade 3 neutropenia was observed only in three patients treated at the fifty dose level. Thrombocytopenia never reached grade 3. Neurotoxicity was considered dose-limiting, since grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in three of five patients treated at the fifth dose level (paclitaxel 210 mg/m²). Other side effects were generally mild. The overall response rate in 22 evaluable patients was 32% (95% CI 13–51%); in particular, 1 complete response (4.5%) and 6 partial responses (27.3%) were observed. The maximally tolerated doses recommended for phase II studies are 180 mg/m² for paclitaxel and 30 mg/m² for vinorelbine. The observed myelosuppression was less severe than anticipated on the basis of the effects of each drug alone. Conclusions: The promising activity of this drug combination warrants a phase II study in untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Received: 9 February 1997 / Accepted: 9 June 1997     

Phase I study of Doxil and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer

Background: Vinorelbine and Doxil (liposomal doxorubicin) are active chemotherapeutic agents in metastatic breast cancer. A phase I study was designed to evaluate combination therapy.Patients and methods: Thirty women with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicity was determined through a dose escalation scheme, and defined for the first treatment cycle, only. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed during the first cycle of treatment.Results: In the first cohort of Doxil 30 mg/m² day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m² days 1 and 8, patients experienced severe neutropenia. Vinorelbine administration was changed thereafter to days 1 and 15 of each cycle. Dose limiting toxicity was observed at Doxil 50 mg/m² and vinorelbine 25 mg/m². Doxil 40 mg/m² and vinorelbine 30 mg/m² was defined as the maximally tolerated dose. Few toxicities (principally neutropenia) were seen at this dose level, with the notable absence of significant nausea, vomiting, or alopecia. Though 63% of patients had received prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy, only one patient developed grade 2 cardiac toxicity. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed prolonged exposure to high doxorubicin concentrations for several days following Doxil administration.Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy with Doxil and vinorelbine affords treatment with two active drugs in women with metastatic breast cancer, and appears to have a favorable toxicity profile. A schedule of Doxil 40 mg/m² day 1 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m² days 1 and 15 given every 28 days is recommended for phase II studies.     

Comparison of effects of doxorubicin and radiation on p53-dependent apoptosis in vivo

The effects of doxorubicin and radiation on apoptosis, p53 expression, and tumor growth in human tumor xenografts were investigated. Human ependymoblastoma (NNE), primitive neuroectodermal tumor (YKP), glioblastoma (KYG) and small cell lung carcinoma (GLS) that are all transplantable to nude mice were treated with doxorubicin (8 mg/kg) or radiation (1 Gy). The histological study was performed by using TUNEL and p53 staining. Cytotoxic effects of doxorubicin and radiation were compared with no-treatment group by the growth curves and apoptotic index of tumor to each treatment. In NNE with wild-type p53, doxorubicin induced growth delay of tumors (tumor volume doubling time; 13.7+/-3.3 days in control group vs 30.4+/-1.5 days in doxorubicin group), but no growth delay of tumors in KYG and GLS with mutant type p53. While radiation-induced apoptosis appeared most frequently at 6 h after irradiation, doxorubicin-induced apoptosis had a tendency to appear later. Furthermore, although the frequency of doxorubicin-induced apoptosis was lower than that of apoptosis by 1 Gy irradiation, apoptotic cells appeared for many hours after the treatment. Doxorubicin-induced apoptosis may be correlated with p53 phenotype because apoptosis was induced only in tumor with wild-type p53, but it appeared less frequently and later than radiation-induced apoptosis.     

Phase I study of intravenous PSC-833 and doxorubicin: reversal of multidrug resistance.

PSC-833 reverses multidrug resistance by P-glycoprotein at concentrations < or = 1000 ng / ml. A phase I study of PSC-833 and doxorubicin was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose and to investigate pharmacokinetics. PSC-833 was intravenously infused as a 2-h loading dose (LD) and a subsequent 24-h continuous dose (CD). Doxorubicin was infused over 5 min, 1 h after the LD. The starting dose was 1 mg / kg for both LD and CD with 30 mg / m(2) doxorubicin; these dosages were increased to 2 and 10 mg / kg and 50 mg / m(2), respectively. Thirty-one patients were treated. Nausea / vomiting was controllable with granisetron and dexamethasone. Neutropenia and ataxia were dose limiting. Steady-state concentrations of PSC-833 > 1000 ng / ml were achieved at a 2 mg / kg LD and a 10 mg / kg CD. Ex-vivo bioassay revealed that activity in serum for reversing multidrug resistance was achieved in all patients; IC(50) of P-glycoprotein expressing 8226 / Dox(6) in patients' serum was decreased from 5.9 to 1.3 microg / ml (P < 0.0001) by PSC-833 administration. Doxorubicin clearance was 24.3 +/- 13.7 (mean +/- SD) liter / h/m(2), which was lower than the 49.0 +/- 16.9 liter / h/m(2) without PSC-833 (P < 0.0001). The relationship between doxorubicin exposure and neutropenia did not differ between patients treated and not treated with PSC-833. The recommended phase II dose of PSC-833 was 2 and 10 mg / kg for LD and CD, respectively, which achieved a sufficient concentration in serum to reverse drug resistance, as confirmed by bioassay. The dose of doxorubicin should be reduced to 40 mg / m(2), not because of the pharmacodynamic interaction between PSC-833 and doxorubicin affecting hematopoiesis, but because of pharmacokinetic interaction.     

Phase I/II study of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of gemcitabine when combined with a fixed dose of vinorelbine in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to evaluate in a phase II trial the activity of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were treated with vinorelbine at fixed dose of 30 mg/m(2) intravenously and gemcitabine at increasing dose levels from 800 to 1,500 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In phase I, dose-limiting toxicity occurred at the dosage of 1,500 mg/m(2) gemcitabine, with three of five patients developing grade 4 thrombocytopenia. In phase II, with gemcitabine at 1,200 mg/m(2), 19 (36%) of 52 assessable patients responded. Objective response was observed in 11 (39%) of 28 patients with stage IIIB disease and in eight (33%) of 24 patients with stage IV. The median time to progression was 29 weeks (range, 2 to 41 weeks; 35 weeks and 16 weeks for stages IIIB and IV, respectively), and median survival was 54 weeks (range, 2 to 84+ weeks; 63 weeks and 42 weeks for stages IIIB and IV, respectively). One-year survival was 64% for patients with stage IIIB disease and 29% for those with stage IV. Clinical benefit response was observed in 29 (59%) of 49 assessable patients. Grade 4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were uncommon (6% and 8% of cases, respectively); however, grade 3/4 leukothrombocytopenia occurred more frequently in patients aged more than 70 years (52% and 24%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The combination of vinorelbine and gemcitabine is effective and tolerable in the treatment of NSCLC, thus deserving randomized trials with cisplatin combination regimens.     

Phase I study of pazopanib and vorinostat: a therapeutic approach for inhibiting mutant p53-mediated angiogenesis and facilitating mutant p53 degradation

TP53 mutation enhances vascular endothelial growth factor overexpression, rendering cancer cells sensitive to pazopanib. Furthermore, treatment with vorinostat facilitates mutant p53 degradation and downregulates hypoxia-mediated resistant pathways. The preliminary clinical evidence we reported here supports the use of pazopanib and vorinostat in patients with TP53-mutated advanced malignancies.BackgroundWe carried out a phase I trial of the vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor pazopanib and the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat to determine the safety and efficacy. Because these agents are known to target factors activated by TP53 mutation and facilitate mutant p53 degradation, a subgroup analysis may be interesting in patients with TP53 mutant malignancies.Patients and methodsPatients with advanced solid tumors (n = 78) were enrolled following a 3 + 3 design, with dose expansion for those with responsive tumors. Hotspot TP53 mutations were tested when tumor specimens were available.ResultsAdverse events of ≥grade 3 included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, fatigue, hypertension, diarrhea and vomiting. Overall, the treatment produced stable disease for at least 6 months or partial response (SD ≥6 months/PR) in 19% of the patients, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2.2 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 8.9 months. In patients with detected hotspot TP53 mutant advanced solid tumors (n = 11), the treatment led to a 45% rate of SD ≥6 months/PR (1 PR and 3 SD ≥6 months), median PFS of 3.5 months, and median OS of 12.7 months, compared favorably with the results for patients with undetected hotspot TP53 mutations (n = 25): 16% (1 PR and 3 SD ≥6 months, P = 0.096), 2.0 months (P = 0.042), and 7.4 months (P = 0.1), respectively.ConclusionThe recommended phase II dosage was oral pazopanib at 600 mg daily plus oral vorinostat at 300 mg daily. The preliminary evidence supports further evaluation of the combination in cancer patients with mutated TP53, especially in those with metastatic sarcoma or metastatic colorectal cancer.Clinical trial registrationwww.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01339871     

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine in pretreated advanced breast cancer: A pilot study

Purpose:Gemcitabine (GEM) and vinorelbine (VNR) are both activeagainst advanced breast cancer (ABC), being able to induce a median ORR of25% and 40%, respectively. Because of their different mechanismof action and good tolerability, the combination of GEM and VNR has beentested in ABC. Patients and methods:Twenty-nine ABC patients pretreated withanthracycline-taxane were treated with GEM 1000 mg/m² on day 1, 8,15, and VNR 25 mg/m² on day 1 and 8 every twenty-eight days.Analysis of toxicity pattern, response rate, TTP and OS were carried out. Results:Twenty-nine patients were enrolled into the trial. TheORR was 48% (95% CI: 29–67): a CR was observed in threepatients (10%; 95% CI: 2–27), while eleven patients(38%; 95 CI: 21–58) achieved PR, eight (28%) had a SD, andseven (24%) progressed. Toxicity was mainly hematological and included:grade 3 leukopenia in 48% of cases without episodes of neutropenicfever, grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia in 10%, and grade 2 anemia in7%. Non-hematological toxicities were mild and rather infrequent. Conclusions:The GEM–VNR combination seems to be active inpretreated ABC with an acceptable toxicity pattern, and may well reppresentan interesting therapeutic choice after anthracycline/taxane regimens.     

Phase I study of Doxil and vinorelbine in patients with advanced malignancies

Introduction. This study was designed to define the maximum tolerated dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil®) and multiday vinorelbine (VNB), without and with prophylactic filgrastim, and to identify antineoplastic effect. Patients and Methods: Patients with resistant cancers were treated with Doxil 50 mg/m² every four weeks, and with VNB 15 mg/m² on the same day. The VNB dose escalations were accomplished in subsequent patient cohorts by adding VNB doses on consecutive days. When the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of VNB with Doxil was defined, prophylactic filgrastim was added to define a second MTD. Results. Of 29 patients entered, two had early adverse events, and 27 received at least one full cycle with at least one month follow-up. The MTD of VNB, combined with Doxil 50 mg/m², was 15 mg/m² on day 1, with neutropenia as the dose-limiting toxicity. With prophylactic filgrastim, the MTD was15 mg/m² daily for two days, with neutropenia and stomatitis as dose-limiting toxicities. Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia occurred frequently, usually after the third cycle. Objective responses were documented in six patients, all of whom received multiday VNB. Conclusion. Doxil 50 mg/m² on day 1 of a 28-day cycle can be safely combined with VNB 15 mg/m2 day 1, or with VNB 15 mg/m² days 1 and 2 with filgrastim prophylaxis. Antineoplastic activity was observed in this heavily pretreated population. Future studies of Doxil 35-40 mg/m² with multiday VNB may be worthwhile, especially in metastatic breast cancer.     

Phase I/II study of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel combined with a fixed dose of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to evaluate in a phase II trial the efficacy of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were treated with paclitaxel in escalating doses from 40-80 mg/m(2) combined with gemcitabine and vinorelbine at fixed doses of 1000 mg/m(2) and 25 mg/m(2), respectively. All drugs were given intravenously on day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In a phase I trial, carried out on 21 patients, grade 4 neutropenia, as dose-limiting toxicity, occurred at the dosage level of paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2). In a phase II trial, with paclitaxel administered at 70 mg/m(2), 27 out of 41 (66%) assessable patients responded (10% complete responses and 56% partial responses). Objective response was observed in 13 of 16 patients (81%) with stage IIIB disease and in 14 of 25 (56%) with stage IV disease. The median time to treatment failure was 26 weeks (range 3-72 weeks; 32 weeks and 20 weeks for stages IIIB and IV, respectively) and median survival 62 weeks (range 4-176 weeks; 72 weeks and 56 weeks for stages IIIB and IV, respectively). One-year survival was 64% for all patients (72% for patients with stage IIIB and 52% for those with stage IV). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia were observed in 11 (27%) and seven (17%) cases, respectively; grade 3 thrombocytopenia was observed in three patients (7%) and grade 3 anemia in four patients (10%). The most relevant non-hematological toxicity was grade 2/3 asthenia, which was observed in 12 patients (29%). Alopecia was almost universal, whereas nausea and vomiting were absent. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine is effective and tolerable in the treatment of NSCLC. The high activity and low toxicity of this regimen warrant randomized studies with platinum-containing combinations.     

Zinostatin and doxorubicin. A combination phase I study

Because of encouraging single-agent activity for both zinostatin and doxorubicin in hepatocellular cancer, a phase I tolerance study with these drugs in combination was undertaken. The dose of zinostatin given daily for 5 consecutive days and repeated every 6 weeks was fixed at 2250 units/M2. The starting dose of doxorubicin was 45 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22 of every 6-week cycle, but this was escalated or deescalated by increments of 33% as tolerated. The occurrence of unpredictable severe and prolonged cumulative myelosuppressive toxicity in most patients resulted in considerable management difficulties. In addition, three patients developed congestive heart failure at cumulative doxorubicin doses ranging from 195 to 270 mg/m2 and two patients developed possible drug-related nephrotoxicity. Until reasons for the pharmacogenetic variability observed with zinostatin are defined, combination studies employing this drug are not recommended.     

Phase I/II study of gemcitabine in association with vinorelbine for metastatic breast cancer

Background. Gemcitabine (G) and vinorelbine (V) have favorable safety profile and antitumor activity in metastatic breast cancer. To exploit their different mechanism of action and lack of overlapping toxicity, we performed a phase I and II study of G and V in combination. Patients and methods. Fifty-three patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated. In the dose-finding phase, seven cohorts of patients (22 women) received increasing doses to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination. Patients recruited in the phase II portion of the study (31 women) received the dose level immediately below the one defined as MTD (i.e., G 1200mg/m², V 30mg/m², on day 1 and day 8, every 3 weeks). Results. Dose escalation was discontinued at G 1400mg/m² and V 30mg/m² because of toxic death due to thrombocytopenia and CNS hemorrage. No other limiting toxicities were observed, and tolerability was similar at all dose levels studied in the escalation portion of the study. The main toxicity was granulocytopenia of grade 3/4 in 36 and 48% of the patients on phase I and II respectively, without episodes of neutropenic fever. Thrombocytopenia was uncommon. Other side effects were usually mild to moderate. In 46 evaluable patients, the response rate was 24% (complete response 7%, partial response 17%). Disease stabilization was observed in further 17%. The median duration of response was 12 months (range 5–14) and the median survival was 20 months (range 1 to 45+). Conclusions. G and V, on day 1 and 8 of 3-weekly cycles, can safely be administered to patients with metastatic breast cancer at the dose of 1200 and 30mg/m², respectively. The antitumor activity of G and V in combination was similar to that reported when using either drug as single agent.     

A multicenter prospective phase II randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. A GOIM study

Background

To evaluate activity and tolerability of two anthracycline-containing regimens as first-line treatment for anthracycline-naïve relapsed breast cancer patients.

Methods

Patients with relapsed breast cancer not previously treated with adjuvant anthracyclines were randomly assigned to epirubicin/vinorelbine (arm A: EPI/VNB, EPI 90 mg/m² on day 1, VNB 25 mg/m² on days 1,5 plus G-CSF subcutaneously on days 7-12, with cycles repeated every 21 days), or to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/VNB (arm B: PLD/VNB, PLD 40 mg/m² on day 1, VNB 30 mg/m² on days 1, 15, with cycles repeated every 4 weeks). Primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the two regimens in terms of response rate, secondarily toxicity, progression free survival and overall survival.

Results

One hundred and four patients have been enrolled (arm A 54, arm B 50): characteristics were well balanced between the 2 arms. Responses were as follows: arm A, 3 (5.6%) CR, 20 (37%) PR, (ORR 42.6%, 95%CI 29.3%-55.9%); arm B, 8 (16%) CR, 18 (36%) PR, (ORR 52%, 95%CI 38.2%-65.8%). Median progression free survival was 10.7 months in arm A (95% CI, 8.7-12.6), and 8.8 months in arm B (95% CI, 7.1-10.5). Median overall survival was 34.6 months in arm A (95%CI, 19.5-49.8) and 24.8 months in arm B (95%CI, 15.7-33.9). As toxicity concerns, both treatment regimens were well tolerated; myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity, with G3-4 neutropenia occurring in 18.5% and 22% of the patients of arm A and B, respectively. No relevant differences in main toxic effects have been observed between the two arms, except for alopecia, more common in arm A, and cutaneous toxicity, observed only in arm B. No clinical congestive heart failures have been observed, one case of tachyarrhythmia was reported after the last EPI/VNB cycle, and two reversible ≥ 20% LVEF decreases have been observed in arm A.

Conclusions

Both anthracycline- containing regimens evaluated in the present study seem to be active and with a satisfactory tolerability in anthracycline-naïve relapsed breast cancer patients.     

Phase I and pharmacological study of sequential intravenous topotecan and oral etoposide.

We performed a phase I and pharmacological study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of a cytotoxic regimen of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan in combination with the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide, and to investigate the clinical pharmacology of both compounds. Patients with advanced solid tumours were treated at 4-week intervals, receiving topotecan intravenously over 30 min on days 1-5 followed by etoposide given orally twice daily on days 6-12. Topotecan-etoposide dose levels were escalated from 0.5/20 to 1.0/20, 1.0/40, and 1.25/40 (mg m-2 day-1)/(mg bid). After encountering DLT, additional patients were treated at 3-week intervals with the topotecan dose decreased by one level to 1.0 mg m-2 and etoposide administration prolonged from 7 to 10 days to allow further dose intensification. Of 30 patients entered, 29 were assessable for toxicity in the first course and 24 for response. The DLT was neutropenia. At doses of topotecan-etoposide 1.25/40 (mg m-2)/(mg bid) two out of six patients developed neutropenia grade IV that lasted more than 7 days. Reduction of the treatment interval to 3 weeks and prolonging etoposide dosing to 10 days did not permit further dose intensification, as a time delay to retreatment owing to unrecovered bone marrow rapidly emerged as the DLT. Post-infusion total plasma levels of topotecan declined in a biphasic manner with a terminal half-life of 2.1 +/- 0.3 h. Total body clearance was 13.8 +/- 2.7 l h-1 m-2 with a steady-state volume of distribution of 36.7 +/- 6.2 l m-2. N-desmethyltopotecan, a metabolite of topotecan, was detectable in plasma and urine. Mean maximal concentrations ranged from 0.23 to 0.53 nmol l-1, and were reached at 3.4 +/- 1.0 h after infusion. Maximal etoposide plasma concentrations of 0.75 +/- 0.54 and 1.23 +/- 0.57 micromol l-1 were reached at 2.4 +/- 1.2 and 2.3 +/- 1.0 h after ingestion of 20 and 40 mg respectively. The topotecan area under the plasma concentration vs time curve (AUC) correlated with the percentage decrease in white blood cells (WBC) (r2 = 0.70) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (r2 = 0.65). A partial response was observed in a patient with metastatic ovarian carcinoma. A total of 64% of the patients had stable disease for at least 4 months. The recommended dose for use in phase II clinical trials is topotecan 1.0 mg m-2 on days 1-5 and etoposide 40 mg bid on days 6-12 every 4 weeks.