Cortisol level in men with major depressive disorder treated with fluoxetine or imipramine

The aim of this research was to find out whether increased plasma cortisol levels appear in unipolar or bipolar patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and whether the effective antidepressant treatment by imipramine and fluoxetine leads to regulation of the cortisol level. Cortisol levels were studied in two groups of patients with major depressive disorder: unipolar and bipolar patients treated with fluoxetine (doses: 20-60 mg/day). This group included 5 patients (age 29-46 yr); unipolar and bipolar subjects treated with imipramine (50-150 mg/day), this group included 5 patients (aged 24-70 yr). Cortisol and fluoxetine or imipramine plasma levels were assessed using HPLC methods: before treatment, after 3, 6 and 24 h of drug administration as well as in the 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 8th week of antidepressant treatment. HPLC methods were previously validated. The research conducted and the clinical data may be useful for proving the essential role of enhanced HPA axis activity for the pathogenesis and depressive disorder proceedings.     

A comparative study of milnacipran and imipramine in the treatment of major depressive disorder

SUMMARY

The antidepressant efficacy and safety of milnacipran, a dual action antidepressant drug which inhibits the reuptake of serotonin and noradrenaline, was compared with that of the tricyclic antidepressant, imipramine, in a multi-centre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group, comparative trial in 5 hospital centres in Spain. One hundred patients hospitalised with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatry Association (third revision), with a minimum score of 25 on the Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale were treated for 6?weeks with milnacipran (100?mg/day) or imipramine (150?mg/day). Both treatments showed similar efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms. The frequency of most adverse events in the milnacipran-treated patients was lower than that observed in the imipramine group, particularly those related to anticholinergic symptoms. Dysuria and shivering, however, were more common with milnacipran. The results of this study support others which have demonstrated that milnacipran has equivalent efficacy but superior tolerability to a tricyclic antidepressant such as imipramine.     

A comparative study of milnacipran and imipramine in the treatment of major depressive disorder

The antidepressant efficacy and safety of milnacipran, a dual action antidepressant drug which inhibits the reuptake of serotonin and noradrenaline, was compared with that of the tricyclic antidepressant, imipramine, in a multi-centre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group, comparative trial in 5 hospital centres in Spain. One hundred patients hospitalised with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatry Association (third revision), with a minimum score of 25 on the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale were treated for 6 weeks with milnacipran (100 mg/day) or imipramine (150 mg/day). Both treatments showed similar efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms. The frequency of most adverse events in the milnacipran-treated patients was lower than that observed in the imipramine group, particularly those related to anticholinergic symptoms. Dysuria and shivering, however, were more common with milnacipran. The results of this study support others which have demonstrated that milnacipran has equivalent efficacy but superior tolerability to a tricyclic antidepressant such as imipramine.     

Followup of adolescents initially treated for prepubertal-onset major depressive disorder with imipramine

This preliminary followup of adolescents (n = 16) with prepubertal-onset major depressive disorder (MDD) suggests that a significant number continue to be depressed or possibly depressed (62%) and have moderate to severe ongoing psychosocial adjustment problems. A concomitant diagnosis of conduct or oppositional disorder at index assessment was a risk factor for an increased incidence of interim depressive episodes and more severe psychosocial adjustment problems including alcohol and drug abuse.     

帕罗西汀与丙米嗪治疗脑卒中后抑郁比较

目的 :比较帕罗西汀与丙米嗪治疗脑卒中后抑郁的疗效及不良反应。方法 :12 1例病人随机分 2组 ,帕罗西汀组 6 1例 (男性 35例 ,女性 2 6例 ;年龄 6 2a±s 10a) ,给帕罗西汀首剂 10mg ,以后 2 0mg ,po ,qd ;6wk为一个疗程。丙米嗪组 6 0例 (男性 33例 ,女性 2 7例 ;年龄 6 3a± 11a) ,给丙米嗪d 1～ 2 2 5mg ,d 3～ 5 5 0mg ,d 6起 75mg ,po ,bid ;6wk为一个疗程。结果 :帕罗西汀组有效率 84 % ,丙米嗪组有效率 82 % ,2组Ridit分析P >0 .0 5。丙米嗪组不良反应较多。结论 :帕罗西汀可用于治疗脑卒中后抑郁     

Adinazolam,a new triazolobenzodiazepine,and imipramine in the treatment of major depressive disorder

This study evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of a new triazolobenzodiazepine, adinazolam, and imipramine in 40 patients with carefully diagnosed major depressive disorder. Overall, adinazolam was found to be as effective as imipramine. In addition, when patients with more severe, melancholic, subtype of depression were examined, adinazolam was also as effective as imipramine. With the exception of sedation, adinazolam patients demonstrated fewer overall adverse events than imipramine subjects. These results suggest that adinazolam may represent an interesting antidepressant compound.     

Fluoxetine treatment of cocaine-dependent patients with major depressive disorder.

Sixty-eight male and female individuals with both DSM-IV diagnoses of cocaine dependence and major depressive disorder were randomly assigned to one of two medication conditions (placebo vs. 40 mg per day) as part of a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical efficacy trial of fluoxetine for the treatment of this dual diagnosis. During the 12-week outpatient treatment phase all participants also received individual cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy targeting both cocaine use and depression. Depressive symptoms remitted as a function of time in treatment, with no significant medication effects found. Fewer cocaine positive urines were found during the first 6 weeks of treatment in the placebo group compared with the 40-mg group. Cocaine use and depressive symptoms during treatment were significantly correlated. The findings fail to support the role of fluoxetine for treatment of cocaine use and depression in dually-diagnosed patients.     

Paroxetine treatment of major depressive disorder

Major depression is recognized as a common, often chronic and recurrent illness that is associated with significant disability and comorbidity. The treatment of patients with major depressive disorder has advanced tremendously in the past decade as a result of the availability of effective and well-tolerated antidepressants. Paroxetine is a widely studied selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) with evidence for efficacy and safety that is supported by a large body of published literature. Evidence for the efficacy and tolerability of anew controlled-release formulation of paroxetine also has been published. Findings from paroxetine clinical studies have added considerably to our knowledge and understanding of the treatment of major depressive disorder, particularly with regard to duration of treatment, the need for treating to full remission and with full doses, and treatment of patients with concurrent symptoms of anxiety.     

Increased neuroactive steroid concentrations in women with bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder

Changes in the plasma concentrations of neuroactive steroids have been associated with various neuropsychiatric disorders. However, the possible role of neuroactive steroids in bipolar disorder (BD) has remained unknown. We therefore determined the plasma levels of neuroactive steroids during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle in women with BD or major depressive disorder (MDD). The plasma concentrations of 3alpha-hydroxy-5alpha-pregnan-20-one (3alpha,5alpha-THPROG), 3alpha,21-dihydroxy-5alpha-pregnan-20-one, progesterone, and cortisol were determined in 17 outpatients with BD, 14 outpatients with MDD, and 16 healthy control subjects. All patients were in a state of well-being and without relapse or recurrence for at least 3 months. Plasma concentrations of progesterone and 3alpha,5alpha-THPROG were significantly greater in patients than in controls, also being higher in BD patients than in MDD patients. Drug-free patients with BD or MDD showed similar differences in steroid concentrations relative to controls, as did drug-treated patients. Comorbidity with panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, or eating disorder had no effect on the association of mood disorders with steroid concentrations. Women with BD or MDD in a state of well-being showed higher plasma concentrations of progesterone and 3alpha,5alpha-THPROG in the luteal phase than did healthy controls. These differences did not seem to be attributable simply to drug treatment or to comorbidity with other psychiatric conditions in the patients.     

Cytokine production and treatment response in major depressive disorder.

In a controlled study, such immunological parameters as whole blood production of the cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor-necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) were assessed in 24 inpatients with a major depressive disorder (MDD) both before and again under treatment. After a 6-week treatment period with amitriptyline, patients were classified as responders or nonresponders according to their psychopathological outcome as evaluated by the Hamilton and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scales. Pre-treatment levels of c-reactive protein (CRP) were significantly higher in both patient subgroups than in the control subjects. In comparison to the controls, unstimulated pretreatment production of IL-6 was significantly decreased in the responders; whereas it was significantly increased in the nonresponder subgroup. Post-treatment values did not differ significantly among the patient and control groups. Pretreatment levels of TNF-alpha were increased in both patient subgroups, with a significant decrease during treatment only in the responder subgroup. Pretreatment levels of IL-6/10(5) mononuclear cells and the ratio between lymphocytes and monocytes acted as independent variables with regard to the clinical response. Our data indicate that unstimulated secretion of TNF-alpha is related to the psychopathological improvement; whereas, IL-6 levels might dichotomize the patients into subsequent responders and nonresponders already at admission.     

Pharmacological treatment for insomnia in patients with major depressive disorder

Introduction: Insomnia in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is highly prevalent and associated with increased suffering and functional impairment. Effective, evidence-based treatments for insomnia in MDD are an unmet need in clinical practice.

Areas covered: Herein, the authors provide a review of the clinical correlates, putative neurobiological mechanisms and treatment options for the management of insomnia in individuals with MDD.

Expert opinion: Sleep disturbances in MDD should be recognized as at least one of the following: (1) a domain of depressive psychopathology; (2) a consequence of rhythm disruptions; (3) a manifestation of comorbidities of sleep disturbances; (4) a manifestation of the influence of sex hormones in the brain in MDD; (5) a general medical comorbidity; and (6) a side effect of antidepressant medications. Assessment of insomnia in clinical practices is routinely performed with the use of non-structured interviews. Other methods such as standardized questionnaires and sleep diaries, along with complementary methods such as actigraphy and polysomnography are more scarcely applied. Smartphones and personal devices offer a promising strategy with the use of passive, long lasting, and ecologically valid assessments despite the lack of studies specifically targeting insomnia in individuals with MDD. New therapeutic approaches are essential, including novel targets such as orexins/hypocretins and the endocannabinoid system.     

Prediction of treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder

Improving the treatment of major depressive disorder will require identification of moderators that predict differential outcomes across treatments at the level of the individual patient, referred to as precision medicine. Currently, there are no biological measures demonstrated to enhance treatment selection accuracy although there are some clinical variables that have prognostic value. Several recent studies comparing treatments with differing mechanisms of action have identified potential moderators that may eventually be used in precision medicine approaches. Genetic combination tests, systemic inflammation, electroencephalography and neuroimaging, in particular, show significant potential for near-term development as clinically meaningful moderators for use in treatment selection. Ultimately, combinations of moderators may provide the greatest level of precision in selecting optimal treatment approaches for individual depressed patients.     

Desvenlafaxine in the treatment of major depressive disorder

Desvenlafaxine (DESV) is a newer antidepressant, which inhibits serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake neurotransmission, similarly to venlafaxine, milnacipran and duloxetine. It was approved in February 2008 by the FDA for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), based on well-controlled and adequately powered, large clinical trials demonstrating efficacy and safety for patients with MDD. Currently available data show that DESV has proven efficacy, acceptable safety and tolerability profiles, convenient once-daily dosing and minimal impact on the cytochrome P450 enzyme system in patients with MDD. This mini-review summarizes the clinical data and practical use of DESV under this approved indication.     

Advances in treatment for postpartum major depressive disorder

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Postpartum depressive disorder (PPD) is a burdensome medical condition. To date, only one treatment (Brexanolone) has undergone registrational trials and is approved in the United States with an indication for the treatment of PPD. However, other treatments are prescribed and have been tested for this condition. Herein, the authors review the available scientific evidence pertaining to the somatic treatments of PPD.

Areas covered: The authors evaluate the published open-label and randomized controlled trials (RCTs), examine the biological mechanisms of PPD treatments, and evaluate how the available data translates into information that may be useful for clinical practice.

Expert opinion: Antidepressants have long been the mainstay of PPD treatment, despite the limited evidence from randomized clinical trials that supports this practice. Brexanolone improves treatment options for women with PPD. However, the relatively burdensome administration and monitoring protocol, along with the high cost of the medication, limit the possibility for an extensive use of this medication. Large, randomized, controlled trials of hormonal treatments in patients with PPD are warranted. Also, treatment with mood stabilizers and/or antipsychotics in women with major depressive disorder, who meet the DSM-5 mixed features specifiers in the post-partum period, should be tested in controlled clinical trials.     

Desvenlafaxine in the treatment of major depressive disorder

Desvenlafaxine (DESV) is a newer antidepressant, which inhibits serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake neurotransmission, similarly to venlafaxine, milnacipran and duloxetine. It was approved in February 2008 by the FDA for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), based on well-controlled and adequately powered, large clinical trials demonstrating efficacy and safety for patients with MDD. Currently available data show that DESV has proven efficacy, acceptable safety and tolerability profiles, convenient once-daily dosing and minimal impact on the cytochrome P450 enzyme system in patients with MDD. This mini-review summarizes the clinical data and practical use of DESV under this approved indication.     

Multiple dose pharmacokinetics of paroxetine in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder.

The current study examined the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of paroxetine after repeated multiple oral dosing in children and adolescents with major depressive or obsessive-compulsive disorder. In this 6-week, open-label, repeat dose, dose-rising study, 62 patients (27 children and 35 adolescents) were treated with paroxetine 10 mg/day for the first 2 weeks of the study, 20 mg/day for the next 2 weeks, and 30 mg/day for the final 2 weeks. Pharmacokinetic sampling and safety assessments occurred at baseline and subsequently on the final treatment day of each dosing level. Between-patient variability in PK was pronounced at the 10 mg dose level, but markedly reduced at higher doses. A supra-proportional increase in plasma concentrations with increasing dose was evident in both age groups. Data for C(max) and AUC(0-24) indicated that, at each dose level, paroxetine steady-state systemic exposure was higher in children than in adolescents. The differences between age groups, however, diminished with each increasing dose, and were virtually abolished when differences in weight among different age groups were considered. Stepwise regression analysis indicated that both oral clearance and volume of distribution were highly dependent on paroxetine dose, cytochrome P4502D6 genotype, and weight (p<0.0001), but not age or sex. Paroxetine was generally safe and well tolerated in both age groups, with the most frequently observed adverse events being largely consistent with those observed in prior paroxetine studies of adult psychiatric patients. Certain gastrointestinal and behavioral activation events (aggressive reaction and nervousness) were reported more frequently in the youngest age group.     

Physical co-morbidity among treatment resistant vs. treatment responsive patients with major depressive disorder

Co-morbid physical illness has been suggested to play an important role among the factors contributing to treatment resistance in patients with major depressive disorder. In the current study we compared the rate of physical co-morbidity, defined by ICD-10, among a large multicenter sample of 702 patients with major depressive disorder. A total of 356 of the participants were defined as treatment resistant depression (TRD) patients—having failed two or more adequate antidepressant trials. No significant difference was found between TRD and non-TRD participants in the prevalence of any ICD-10 category. This finding suggests that although physical conditions such as diabetes, thyroid dysfunction, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and peptic diseases are often accompanied by co-morbid MDD, they do not necessarily have an impact on the course of MDD or the likelihood to respond to treatment. Marginally higher rates of co-morbid breast cancer, migraine and glaucoma were found among TRD participants. Possible explanations for these findings and their possible relation to TRD are discussed.     

Comparing the effects of 8-week treatment with fluoxetine and imipramine on fasting blood glucose of patients with major depressive disorder

This study was designed to compare the effects of fluoxetine and imipramine on fasting blood glucose (FBG) in patients with major depressive disorder. Sixty nondiabetic patients with major depressive disorder (based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria) entered this randomized, double-blind study. Patients did not receive any medication affecting serum FBG levels for at least 2 weeks before the initiation of the study. Patients were assigned to receive 20 to 40 mg/d of fluoxetine or 75 to 200 mg/d of imipramine for 8 weeks. Pregnant women and patients with diabetes mellitus and a history of any major heart disease were excluded from this study. Additionally, none of the patients should have received electroconvulsive therapy within 6 months before the initiation of the antidepressants. FBG levels were measured at the initiation, as well as 4 and 8 weeks after starting antidepressants. Nineteen patients in the fluoxetine and 24 patients in the imipramine groups completed the study. In the fluoxetine group, FBG level was decreased from 88.5 mg/dL (baseline) to 85.0 mg/dL at week 4 (P = 0.73), and to 79.8 mg/dL at week 8 (P < 0.001). On the other hand, in the imipramine group, FBG level was increased from 86.96 mg/dL (baseline) to 89.71 mg/dL at week 4 (P = 0.079), and to 96.90 mg/dL at week 8 (P < 0.001). This 8-week study showed that FBG levels may decrease in depressive patients receiving fluoxetine and may increase in those patients treated with imipramine. Therefore, it is suggested to measure and monitor FBG before initiation and during treatment with fluoxetine and imipramine.