Phase III trial of irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid versus irinotecan plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Purpose

To determine whether irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (mIROX) is superior to irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin (FUFIRI) as first-line therapy of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Patients and methods

A phase III, randomised, open-label multicentre study compared standard treatment with FUFIRI (irinotecan 80 mg/m², 5-fluorouracil 2000 mg/m², folinic acid 500 mg/m² weekly times 6) to mIROX using an identical schedule of irinotecan plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² applied on days 1, 15 and 29 of a 7-week cycle. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of 479 eligible patients were randomly assigned. Progression-free survival was 7.2 months in the mIROX arm and 8.2 months in the FUFIRI arm [hazard ratio = 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-1.37; P = 0.178]. Comparable results were also obtained for overall survival time with 19 months in the mIROX-arm and 22 months in the FUFIRI-arm (hazard ratio = 1.08, P = 0.276). Both regimens induced an identical objective response rate (ORR) of 41%, but disease control rate (ORR plus stable disease) was significantly greater in the FUFIRI group (81% versus 68%, P = 0.001). Most frequent grades 1-4 side-effects of mIROX and FUFIRI treatment were nausea (80% versus 73%) and delayed diarrhoea (79% versus 68%). Grades 3-4 toxicities were generally below 10%, except for diarrhoea which was more frequent in the mIROX-arm compared to the FUFIRI-arm (19% versus 30%, P = 0.006)

Conclusion

mIROX failed to show superior activity compared to high-dose 5-FU/folinic acid plus irinotecan. Due to better tolerability the combination of high-dose 5-FU/folinic acid and irinotecan remains a standard of care in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Randomised phase-II trial of CAPIRI (capecitabine, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab vs FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

Background:

To compare the efficacy and safety of CAPIRI+bevacizumab (Bev) in comparison with FOLFIRI+Bev as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods:

Patients were randomised to receive either FOLFIRI plus Bev 5 mg kg⁻¹ every 2 weeks (Arm-A) or CAPIRI plus Bev 7.5 mg kg⁻¹ every 3 weeks (Arm-B).

Results:

Three hundred thirty-three patients (Arm-A=167; Arm-B=166) were enrolled into the study. No difference was observed in median progression-free survival (PFS) (10.0 and 8.9 months; P=0.64), overall survival (25.7 and 27.5 months; P=0.55) or response rates (45.5 and 39.8.7% P=0.32) for FOLFIRI-Bev and CAPIRI-Bev, respectively. Patients treated with CAPIRI-Bev presented significantly higher incidence of diarrhoea (P=0.005), febrile neutropenia (P=0.003) and hand–foot skin reactions (P=0.02) compared with patients treated with FOLFIRI-Bev. Treatment delays (P=0.05), dose reduction (P<0.001) and treatment discontinuation owing to toxicity (P=0.01) occurred more frequently in the CAPIRI-Bev arm.

Conclusion:

The PFS of FOLFIRI-BEV is not superior to that observed with the CAPIRI-Bev regimen. CAPIRI-Bev has a less favourable toxicity profile, requiring dose reductions, in order to be considered as an option in first-line treatment of patients with mCRC.     

Second-line chemotherapy with weekly oxaliplatin and high-dose 5-fluorouracil with folinic acid in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) phase II feasibility study

Backround:Oxaliplatin is a novel platinum derivative, which,combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA), demonstratessynergistic activity in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). The HeCOGperformed a multicenter phase II study of a weekly oxaliplatin administrationschedule in patients with previously treated MCC to evaluate the antitumorefficacy and toxicity of this combination. Patients and methods:Eligible patients included those whorelapsed after or during chemotherapy with 5-FU and FA and/or irinotecan.Prior radiotherapy was accepted provided that measurable disease was outsidethe radiation fields. Other eligibility criteria included written informedconsent, a WHO performance status 2 and adequate bone marrow, liver andrenal function. Treatment consisted of Oxaliplatin 50 mg/m² bytwo-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by FA 500 mg/m²(two-hour i.v. infusion) and 5-FU 2500 mg/m² (24-hour continuousi.v. infusion) on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36. The regimen was repeated every50 days. Results:Thirty-two patients (Median age 61 years, range25–76) entered the trial. The majority (75%) had progressed afterreceiving first-line chemotherapy.Diarrhea was the main non-hematologic toxicity. More than half of thepatients (53%) developed grades 3 or 4 diarrhea. Due to this sideeffect only 29% of cycles were given with at least 90% of theplanned dose of 5-FU. Hematologic toxicity included grade 3 neutropenia andthrombocytopenia (10% for each), and grade 4 thrombocytopenia(3%). Two patients (6%) died of sepsis, one related toneutropenia and one due to urinary tract sepsis. Sixteen patients (50%)developed grades 1 and 2 neurotoxicity in the form of sensory neuropathy,which was mild and transient. The objective response rate was 13%(95% CI: 3%–29%). All four responses were partial.Twelve patients (38%) had stable disease and 8 (25%) progressivedisease. The median time to progression was three months and the mediansurvival was nine months from the start of therapy. The Kaplan–Meierestimated probability of one-year survival for the group as a whole was32%. Conclusions:The weekly administration of oxaliplatin with 5-FUand FA was associated with considerably less neurotoxicity than otherschedules. However, the high percentage of diarrhea suggests that a dosereduction of 5-FU in this regimen may result in better therapeutic synergy.     

An alternating regimen of irinotecan/ 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin/ 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid in metastatic colorectal cancer: a Phase II trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and activity of a combination schedule with irinotecan (CPT-11), oxaliplatin (L-OHP), brief infusional fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC) patients. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients were treated with CPT-11 125 mg/m2 as a 90-min intravenous infusion, followed by FA 20 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus, and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 over a 2-hour intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8. L-OHP was administered at 85 mg/m2 over 2 h on day 15, in combination with a FA 60 mg/m2 intravenous bolus and 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as a 2-hour intravenous infusion on days 15-16. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks for a maximum of 9 cycles. RESULTS: Twenty-five of 50 assessable patients achieved a complete (n=5) or partial (n=20) response, leading to a response rate of 50% (95% CI 35-64%). Eighteen (36%) patients showed stable disease. The median time to tumor progression was 10.3 months (95% CI 9.6-10.9 months). After a median follow-up of 16.4 months, the median survival was not reached. Grade 3 neutropenia (8%), grade 3 nausea/vomiting (6%) and grade 3 diarrhea (2%) were the major adverse events. CONCLUSION: This alternating three-drug regimen is very well tolerated, manageable and effective in terms of activity and time to progression.     

First-line 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) does not impair the feasibility and the activity of second line treatments in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: We conducted two phase II trials evaluating the combination of 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) as first-line treatment in 74 metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Results were very promising with an overall response rate of 71% and 72%, a median PFS of 10.4 and 10.8 months and an overall survival of 26.5 and 28.4 months, respectively. A concern about the use of all three active agents up-front is the possibility that this might limit, after progression, disease control with second-line treatments. Therefore, we conducted the present analysis to evaluate the outcome of second-line treatments in these 74 patients. METHODS: Among the 71 patients so far progressed 54 (76%) received second line chemotherapy (23: FOLFIRI, 17: FOLFOXIRI, five: 5-FU protracted infusion, three: FOLFOX, three: 5-FU+MMC, two: CPT-11, one: CPT-11+LOHP, one: raltitrexed). Seventeen patients (24%) did not receive second line treatments: 10 because of deterioration of performance status (PS), four because of patient refusal and three because of death. Patients' characteristics at the time of second-line treatment were: M/F 36 of 18 patients, median age 64 yrs (range 44-75), ECOG PS>or=1 21 (39%) patients, multiple sites of disease 33 (61%) patients. RESULTS: A median of 4.1 months of second-line chemotherapy per patient were administered (range 1-8). Overall response rate (52 out of 54 evaluable patients) was 33% and stable disease were 19 (37%). Median duration of response was 8.1 months. At a median follow up of 15.1 months from the start of salvage chemotherapy median PFS and overall survival were respectively 6.7 and 15.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: First-line FOLFOXIRI does not impair the possibility to obtain objective responses and delay tumor progression with second line treatments containing the same agents used in first-line.     

An oxaliplatin + 5-fluorouracil bolus + folinic acid (BFOL) regimen as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated, as first line, with 5-fluorouracil bolus/leucovorin + oxaliplatin, in terms of response, progression-free and overall survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of consecutive metastatic colorectal cancer patients, treated from 2003 to 2006, was identified and analyzed. All patients, without a central venous device, were treated with oxaliplatin + 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. RESULTS: Twenty-five metastatic colorectal cancer patients were treated. No 3-4 grade toxicity was observed. Five of 23 patients achieved a partial response: one of them resulted in a complete response after radiofrequency and another one after surgery. Fifteen of 23 patients had stable disease (one underwent radical surgery after chemotherapy, obtaining a complete remission) and 3 had progressive disease. Median progression-free survival was 7.2 months, and median overall survival was 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this case-series study, the regimen seems to offer a good control of disease (86.9%) and can be considered as an alternative choice for patients who cannot receive continuous infusion.     

Cetuximab in combination with irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (FOLFIRI) in the initial treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre two-part phase I/II study

Background  

This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab combined with irinotecan, folinic acid (FA) and two different doses of infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the first-line treatment of EGFR-detectable metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Simvastatin plus irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal patients: a multicenter phase II study

Background  Simvastatin has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in preclinical studies via tumor cell senescence, anti-angiogenesis, and apoptosis. This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity profile of conventional FOLFIRI chemotherapy plus simvastatin in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Methods  Patients received irinotecan 180 mg/m² as a 90-min infusion followed by leucovorin 200 mg/m² in a 2-h infusion, and then 5-FU 400 mg/m² bolus injection followed by 2,400 mg/m² as a 46-h continuous infusion. Treatment cycles were repeated every 2 weeks until documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient’s refusal. Simvastatin 40 mg tablet was given once daily per oral everyday during the period of chemotherapy without a rest. Results  From October 2005 to June 2006, 49 patients were enrolled. The overall response rate (ORR) was 46.9% (95% CI, 31.0–58.8) by intent-to-treat analysis and 45.8% (95% CI, 33.3–62.8) by per-protocol analysis. There were one complete response (CR) and 22 partial responses (PRs). Both CR and PRs were confirmed at least 4 weeks later. The disease-control rate was 83.7% (95% CI, 73.4–94.0). The median follow-up duration was 25.6 months (range, 20.9–28.8 months). The median survival of all patients was 21.8 months (95% CI, 14.4, 29.2). The median TTP was 9.9 months (95% CI, 6.4, 13.3). No patients experienced additional adverse effect that was definitely caused by simvastatin drug therapy in this trial. Conclusion  The combination of simvastatin plus FOLFIRI was a feasible regimen with promising antitumor activity.     

Sequential chemotherapy with dose-dense docetaxel, cisplatin, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (TCF-dd) followed by combination of oxaliplatin, folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (COFFI) in metastatic gastric cancer: results of a phase II trial

Purpose

To evaluate a new strategy of two sequential, intensified chemotherapy regimens in metastatic gastric cancer.

Patients and methods

Chemo-na?ve patients with metastatic gastric cancer were enrolled to receive 4 cycles of TCF-dd (docetaxel initially 85?mg/m² and cisplatin initially 75?mg/m² on day 1 [later modified due to toxicity: 70 and 60?mg/m² respectively], l-folinic acid 100?mg/m² on days 1 and 2, 5-fluorouracil 400?mg/m² bolus and then 600?mg/m² as a 22?h continuous infusion on day 1 and 2, every 14?days). Subsequently, patients with CR, PR or SD received 4 cycles of COFFI (oxaliplatin 85?mg/m², irinotecan 140?mg/m², l-folinic acid 200?mg/m², 5-fluorouracil bolus 400?mg/m² on day 1 followed by 2,400?mg/m² as a 48?h continuous infusion, every 14?days). In both regimens pegfilgrastim 6?mg subcutaneously on day 3 was included.

Results

Forty consecutive patients were enrolled. TCF-dd regimen achieved an ORR of 55% (95% CI, 40?C70). Twenty-three patients proceeded to COFFI. After this regimen the ORR was then increased to 60% (95% CI, 45?C75). Among the 21 patients treated with TCF-dd after the protocol amendments, main grade 3?C4 toxicities were: neutropenia (29%), thrombocytopenia (19%), asthenia (24%) and diarrhea (14%). COFFI caused grade 3?C4 neutropenia (all not febrile) and diarrhea in 35% and 17% of patients respectively.

Conclusions

A sequential strategy with TCF-dd followed by COFFI is very active and may be of special interest in selected patients.     

Oxaliplatin plus high-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus (OXAFAFU) versus irinotecan plus high-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus (IRIFAFU) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group phase III trial.

PURPOSE: The primary end point of this phase III trial was to compare the response rate (RR) of oxaliplatin (OXA) plus levo-folinic acid (l-FA) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus with that of irinotecan (IRI) plus l-FA and 5-FU bolus in advanced colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma were randomly allocated to receive: IRI 200 mg/m(2) on day 1, l-FA 250 mg/m(2) intravenously plus 5-FU 850 mg/m(2) on day 2 (IRIFAFU); or OXA 100 mg/m(2) on day 1, l-FA 250 mg/m(2) plus 5-FU 1050 mg/m(2) on day 2 [OXAFAFU high dose (hd)]. Cycles were given every 2 weeks. After a planned interim analysis, OXA was reduced to 85 mg/m(2) and 5-FU to 850 mg/m(2) [OXAFAFU low dose (ld)]. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-four patients (IRIFAFU, 135; OXAFAFUhd, 71; OXAFAFUld, 68) were treated. Forty-two confirmed responses were achieved with IRIFAFU, 29 with OXAFAFUhd and 32 with OXAFAFUld. The response rate with OXAFAFU [44%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 35% to 52%] was significantly higher (P=0.029) than that of IRIFAFU (31%; 95% CI 23% to 40%). Occurrence of grade > or =3 neutropenia with OXAFAFUld was similar to that for IRIFAFU (29% versus 31%), while severe diarrhoea was significantly lower (12% versus 24%). Median failure-free survival (7 versus 5.8 months; P=0.046) and overall survival of patients (18.9 versus 15.6 months; P=0.032) were significantly prolonged with OXAFAFU. CONCLUSIONS: OXAFAFU was more active and less toxic than IRIFAFU, and it should be preferred in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients.     

A pilot phase II study of chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan in metastatic gastric cancer

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Previous phase II studies have reported that combinations of oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil are associated with good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in metastatic gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (COFFI regimen) in metastatic gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients received oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2 d 1), irinotecan (140 mg/m2 d 1), and L-folinic acid (200 mg/m2 d 1) followed by 5-fluorouracil bolus (400 mg/m2 d 1) and then 5-fluorouracil (2,400 mg/m2 48-h continuous infusion), every 14 days. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with metastatic gastric cancer were enrolled. Eight patients were pretreated for advanced disease. Of the 9 chemo-na?ve patients, 8 were evaluated for response (1 patient was lost to follow-up): one complete response, 5 partial responses and 2 progressions of disease occurred, giving an overall response rate, at intention-to-treat analysis, of 67%. Of the 8 pretreated patients, 6 were evaluated for response (2 patients had nonmeasurable disease): one partial response, 2 disease stabilizations and 3 progressions of disease occurred, giving an overall response rate, at intention-to-treat analysis, of 12%. Median progression-free and overall survival in chemo-na?ve patients were 8.2 and 10.2 months, respectively, and in pretreated patients 2.7 and 3 months. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 55% of chemo-na?ve patients. Thrombocytopenia, and anemia were observed in 18% and 29%, respectively. Grade 3 nausea/vomiting occurred in 12% and grade 3 diarrhea in 6%. CONCLUSIONS: The COFFI regimen is active and well tolerated, therefore phase III studies are warranted.     

A phase II study of irinotecan plus chronomodulated oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in advanced colorectal cancer patients

The combination of irinotecan (CPT-11), oxaliplatin (L-OHP), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) is one of the possibilities to overcome chemoresistance in advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) patients. The aim of this study was to determine the tolerability and activity of CPT-11 plus chronomodulated infusion of L-OHP, 5-FU and FA in ACRC patients. A total of 35 patients (91% pretreated, 77% with CPT-11, 54% with L-OHP, 42% with both) were treated every 3 weeks with CPT-11, 180 mg m(-2) day 1 i.v., plus L-OHP, 20 mg m(-2) day(-1), 5-FU, 700 mg m(-2) day(-1) and FA, 150 mg m(-2) day(-1), all three drugs from day 2 to day 5 by chronomodulated infusion. The patients' (pt) data were as follows: male/female 21/14; median age 58 years (range: 38-70); PS 0: 26 pts (74%), PS 1: 8 pts (23%), PS 2: 1 pt (3%); primary tumour colon/rectum 26/9; involved organs: 1, 14 pts (40%); 2, 17 pts (48%); >or=3: 4 pts (11%); previous chemotherapy lines 1: 12 pts (34%), 2: 10 pts (28%), >or=3: 10 pts (28%). A total of 221 courses (c) were performed; no grade 4 toxicity was observed with only one grade 3 (G3) neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (3%) in one out of 221 courses (<1%). Maximal toxicity (G3) was nausea and diarrhoea in 10 pts (28%), occurring in 14 out of 221 c (6%) and 12 out of 221 c (5%) respectively. Seven patients achieved a partial response (20%, confidence interval (c.i.) 6.8-33.3) and one patient a complete response (2.9%, c.i. 0-8.4), for a total overall response rate of 22.9% (c.i. 9-36.8); 15 out of 35 (42.9%, c.i. 26.5-59.3) had stable disease and 12 out of 35 (34.3%, c.i. 18.6-50) patients underwent a progression. In conclusion, this four-drug regimen is feasible in advanced pretreated ACRC patients with no significant haematological toxicity and acceptable diarrhoea. The activity of this combination is currently studied in EORTC 05011 study.     

A randomised phase II study of oxaliplatin alone versus oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (Mayo Clinic regimen) in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients

The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of both oxaliplatin as a single agent and oxaliplatin in combination with dailyx5 bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (5-FU/FA, Mayo clinic regimen) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. 73 advanced CRC patients were randomised to receive either oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks (35 patients), or the same treatment combined with 5-FU 425 mg/m(2)/day and FA 20 mg/m(2)/dayx5 days every 4 weeks (38 patients). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients had documented inoperable disease and no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease. Based on the investigators' assessment of best response, objective response rate was 9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2-24%) in the oxaliplatin arm, and 45% (95% CI 27-64%) in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2 months (95% CI 1.7-2.4 months) in the oxaliplatin arm and 3.9 months (95% CI 2.9-5 months) in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. Severe neutropenia was seen in 23% of patients in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm, and none in the oxaliplatin arm. There were two treatment-related deaths, both in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. In the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm, severe diarrhoea, vomiting and stomatitis were seen in 34, 14 and 14% of the patients, respectively. In conclusion, oxaliplatin at a dose of 85 mg/m(2) given every 2 weeks was well tolerated and has limited activity in metastatic CRC, while the combination of this treatment with the full-dose Mayo clinic regimen (5-FU bolus 425 mg/m(2)/day+FA 20 mg/m(2)/dayx5 days every 4 weeks), although active, was unfeasible due to a high level of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. Alternative lower dosing or other regimens are to be explored to ascertain the value of bolus 5-FU/FA combined with oxaliplatin.     

Subgroup analysis in RAISE: a randomized,double-blind phase III study of irinotecan,folinic acid,and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) plus ramucirumab or placebo in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma progression

BackgroundThe RAISE phase III clinical trial demonstrated that ramucirumab + FOLFIRI improved overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.844, P = 0.0219] and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.793, P < 0.0005) compared with placebo + FOLFIRI for second-line metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) patients previously treated with first-line bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine. Since some patient or disease characteristics could be associated with differential efficacy or safety, prespecified subgroup analyses were undertaken. This report focuses on three of the most relevant ones: KRAS status (wild-type versus mutant), age (<65 versus ≥65 years), and time to progression (TTP) on first-line therapy (<6 versus ≥6 months).Patients and methodsOS and PFS were evaluated by the Kaplan–Meier analysis, with HR determined by the Cox proportional hazards model. Treatment-by-subgroup interaction was tested to determine whether treatment effect was consistent between subgroup pairs.ResultsPatients with both wild-type and mutant KRAS benefited from ramucirumab + FOLFIRI treatment over placebo + FOLFIRI (interaction P = 0.526); although numerically, wild-type KRAS patients benefited more (wild-type KRAS: median OS = 14.4 versus 11.9 months, HR = 0.82, P = 0.049; mutant KRAS: median OS = 12.7 versus 11.3 months, HR = 0.89, P = 0.263). Patients with both longer and shorter first-line TTP benefited from ramucirumab (interaction P = 0.9434), although TTP <6 months was associated with poorer OS (TTP ≥6 months: median OS = 14.3 versus 12.5 months, HR = 0.86, P = 0.061; TTP <6 months: median OS = 10.4 versus 8.0 months, HR = 0.86, P = 0.276). The subgroups of patients ≥65 versus <65 years also derived a similar ramucirumab survival benefit (interaction P = 0.9521) (≥65 years: median OS = 13.8 versus 11.7 months, HR = 0.85, P = 0.156; <65 years: median OS = 13.1 versus 11.9 months, HR = 0.86, P = 0.098). The safety profile of ramucirumab + FOLFIRI was similar across subgroups.ConclusionsThese analyses revealed similar efficacy and safety among patient subgroups with differing KRAS mutation status, longer or shorter first-line TTP, and age. Ramucirumab is a beneficial addition to second-line FOLFIRI treatment for a wide range of patients with mCRC.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01183780     

Use of the folinic acid/5-fluorouracil/irinotecan (FOLFIRI 1) regimen in elderly patients as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a Phase II study

Background  The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a combination of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and irinotecan (FOLFIRI 1) administered every 2 weeks in a population of elderly subjects with advanced colorectal cancer. Patients and methods  Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer included in this study were aged at least 70 years, with a performance status of 0/1, without geriatric syndrome and without previous palliative chemotherapy. They received irinotecan [180 mg/m² intravenous (iv) infusion over 90 min] followed by folinic acid (400 mg/m² iv over 2 h), then 5FU (400 mg/m² iv bolus) and 5FU (2,400 mg/m² continuous iv infusion for 46 h) every 2 weeks. Results  Forty eligible patients were included. The median age was 77.3 years (range 70–84.7). The objective response rate was 40% and the stabilisation rate was 45%. Median progression-free survival was 8 months, overall survival was 17.2 months and cancer-related specific survival was 20.2 months. In total, 300 cycles of chemotherapy were administered with a median number of eight cycles per patient (range 1–18). Tolerance was good; grade 3/4 toxicities included diarrhoea (15%), asthenia (15%), nausea/vomiting (7.5%) and neutropenia (7.5%). One toxic death was observed due to grade 4 diarrhoea. Conclusion  The FOLFIRI 1 regimen is a valid therapeutic option for elderly patients in good clinical condition. This study was partly sponsored by Pfizer, Paris, France.     

A triplet combination with irinotecan (CPT-11), oxaliplatin (LOHP), continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOXIRI) plus cetuximab as first-line treatment in KRAS wt,metastatic colorectal cancer: a pilot phase II trial

Background:

We conducted an open-label, pilot phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods:

Thirty patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC, <70 years and with performance status 0–1 were included in the trial.

Results:

Complete and partial responses were observed in 4 (13.3%) and 17 (56.7%) patients, respectively (overall response rate (ORR)=70% 95% confidence interval (CI): 53.6%-86.4%); 8 patients (26.7%) had stable disease and 1 had progressive disease. The median time to tumour progression was 10.2 months (95% CI: 7.1–13.4) and the overall median survival time was 30.3 months (95% CI: 18.8–41.9). Secondary R0 resection was performed in 11 (37%) patients. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea and neutropenia were observed in 16 (53%) and 7 (23.3%) patients, respectively, and febrile neutropenia observed in 2 (6.6%) patients. Neurotoxicity grade 2 or 3 was reported in 7 (23.3%) and in 2 (6.7%) patients, respectively, and grade 3 rush was reported in 1 patient.

Conclusion:

The FOLFOXIRI/cetuximab combination presented increased activity in terms of response rate and R0 secondary liver metastases resection, and merits further investigation, especially in patients with initially unresectable disease confined to the liver.     

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as second-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III noninferiority study

BackgroundTo demonstrate the noninferiority of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after prior irinotecan-based chemotherapy.Patients and methodsA total of 627 patients were randomly assigned to receive XELOX (n = 313) or FOLFOX-4 (n = 314) following disease progression/recurrence or intolerance to irinotecan-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsPFS for XELOX was noninferior to FOLFOX-4 [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83–1.14] in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Median PFS was 4.7 months with XELOX versus 4.8 months with FOLFOX-4. The robustness of the primary analysis was supported by multivariate and subgroup analyses. Median overall survival in the ITT population was 11.9 months with XELOX versus 12.5 months with FOLFOX-4 (HR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.86–1.21). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 50% of XELOX- and 65% of FOLFOX-4-treated patients. Whereas grade 3/4 neutropenia (35% versus 5% with XELOX) and febrile neutropenia (4% versus < 1%) were more common with FOLFOX-4, grade 3/4 diarrhea (19% versus 5% with FOLFOX-4) and grade 3 hand–foot syndrome (4% versus < 1%) were more common with XELOX.ConclusionXELOX is noninferior to FOLFOX-4 when administered as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.