Myocardial damage in high-risk patients undergoing elective endovascular or open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) provides an objective assessment of the presence and extent of coronary artery disease. Therefore we compared cardiac outcome in patients at high-cardiac risk undergoing open or endovascular repair of infrarenal AAA using preoperative DSE results. METHODS: Consecutive patients with >or=3 cardiac risk factors (age >70 years, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, renal failure, and diabetes mellitus) undergoing infrarenal AAA repair were reviewed retrospectively. All underwent cardiac stress testing using DSE. Postoperatively data on troponin release and ECG were collected on day 1, 3, 7, before discharge, and on day 30. The main outcome measures were perioperative myocardial damage and myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death. RESULTS: All 77 patients (39 endovascular, 38 open) had a history of cardiac disease. The number and type of cardiac risk factors were similar in both groups. Also DSE results were similar: 55 vs 56%, 24 vs 28%, and 21 vs 18% had no, limited, or extensive stress induced myocardial ischemia respectively. The incidence of perioperative myocardial damage (47% vs 13%, p=0.001) and the combination of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death (13% vs 0%, p=0.02) was significantly lower in patients receiving endovascular repair. CONCLUSION: In patients with similar high cardiac risk, endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms is associated with a reduced incidence of perioperative myocardial damage.     

Outcome in patients at high risk after open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE: Outcomes after surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in patients at high risk remain poorly defined. We investigated the short-term and long-term results of open repair of infrarenal AAA in a high-risk and comparison low-risk patient population. METHODS: Conventional open surgical repair of nonruptured infrarenal AAA was performed in 572 consecutive patients from 1990 to 2000. Patients were considered at high risk if they had one or more of the following criteria: age 80 years or more, creatinine level 3.0 mg/dL or higher, severe pulmonary insufficiency, severe cardiac dysfunction, or hepatic failure. A retrospective review was carried out to determine relative risks, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term survival. A P value of less than.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight of the study patients (22%) were at high risk and 444 were at low risk. Patients at high risk were older (77 versus 69 years; P <.001), were more likely female (26% versus 16%; P <.009), and had larger (mean, 5.9 versus 5.6 cm; P <.024), more symptomatic (20% versus 13%; P <.001) aneurysms. The 30-day operative mortality rate for the high-risk group was 4.7%, compared with 0.0% (P <.001) in the low-risk group. Overall and major morbidity rates were 29% and 14% in the high-risk cohort versus 17% (P <.003) and 5% in the low-risk cohort, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 46% (standard deviation, 5.2%) in the high-risk group versus 74% (standard deviation, 2.6%) in the low-risk group (P <.001). On multivariate analysis, age 80 years or more (P <.046), creatinine level 3.0 mg/dL or higher (P <.022), prior stroke (P <.012), and pulmonary dysfunction were significant predictors of poor operative outcome (30-day mortality and major morbidity), and female gender (P <.035), cardiac dysfunction (P <.004), creatinine level 3.0 mg/dL or higher (P <.0001), prior stroke (P <.005), and pulmonary dysfunction (P <.0001) negatively impacted long-term survival rates. CONCLUSION: This study shows that open repair of infrarenal AAA in patients at high risk can be performed with relative safety and with results that offer a benchmark with which endovascular repair can be compared. Poor long-term survival in this population, however, highlights the importance of patient selection and raises the question of whether repair of many patients at high risk is warranted.     

手术治疗腹主动脉瘤205例远期疗效分析

目的评价手术治疗肾下型腹主动脉瘤的围手术期和远期效果。方法回顾性分析205例肾下型腹主动脉瘤切除术的临床资料,总结围手术期并发症和远期生存率,评价手术治疗腹主动脉瘤的安全性和远期疗效。结果30 d围手术期死亡率为1．0％;手术时间3-6 h,平均(3．8±1．4)h;ICU恢复时间中位数为16 h。围术期主要并发症包括心功能不全18例,呼吸功能不全10例,急性心肌梗塞2例,急性脑梗塞2例,急性肾功能衰竭4例;寿命表分析1、3、5年生存率分别为96．2％,83．1％,75．8％,随访中未发现与人工血管移植有关的死亡病例和并发症。结论手术仍是腹主动脉瘤的标准治疗方法。术前全身系统风险的评估和围手术期的谨慎管理在提高手术治疗效果中起重要作用。     

Disparate outcome after endovascular treatment of small versus large abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVES: The size of an abdominal aortic aneurysm is the most important parameter for determining whether repair is appropriate. This decision, however, must be considered in the context of long-term outcome of treatment, balancing risk for rupture with mortality from the initial procedure and all subsequent secondary procedures necessary when durability is not ideal. Information on the results of endovascular repair of small versus large aneurysms has not been available. METHODS: Preoperative imaging studies and postoperative outcome were assessed in 700 patients who underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm over 6 years at a single institution. Patients were divided into two groups: 416 patients (59.4%) with aneurysms smaller than 5.5 cm in diameter and 284 patients (40.6%) with aneurysms 5.5 cm or larger in diameter. Outcome variables were assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Patients with small and large aneurysms were comparable with regard to all baseline parameters assessed, with the single exception of a small increase in age (2.3 years) in patients with large aneurysms (P =.031). While there were no differences in rate of type II endoleaks, mid-term changes in sac diameter, or aneurysm rupture between the two groups, at 24 months patients with large aneurysms had more type I leaks (6.4% +/- 2.3% vs 1.4% +/- 0.6%; P =.011), device migration (13% +/- 4.0% vs 4.4% +/- 1.8%; P =.006), and conversion to open surgical repair (8.2% +/- 3.2% vs 1.4% +/- 1.1%; P =.031). Of greatest importance, at 24 months patient survival was diminished (71% +/- 4.6% vs 86% +/- 2.8%; P <.001) and risk for aneurysm-related death was increased (6.1% +/- 2.6% vs 1.5% +/- 1.0%; P =.011) in the group with large aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Outcome after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm depends on size; results appear inferior in patients with larger aneurysms. These differences attain importance when choosing between observation and repair, balancing risk for rupture against size-dependent outcome.     

Predictors of Cardiac Morbidity And Mortality in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta

The aim of this study was to determine predictors of cardiac morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta. This was a retrospective cohort study that took place in a University-affiliated county hospital. Preoperative and intraoperative variables were collected from a consecutive series of patients who underwent repair of the thoracic aorta at our institution between 1998 and 2003. Perioperative complications and mortality were identified for each patient. Fifty-nine patients underwent endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta. The endografts were successfully deployed in 58 (98%) patients. Nine (15%) died perioperatively, 4 (7%) from cardiac causes. There were 12 (20%) perioperative cardiac events. A history of myocardial infarction (MI) was the only preoperative risk factor that was predictive of a cardiac event (p = 0.001). The cardiac event rate was 29% for patients who did not receive perioperative beta-blockade vs. 8% in patients who did (p = 0.04). Intraoperative predictors of MI were estimated blood loss (2480 cc vs. 680 cc, p = 0.01), intravenous (IV) fluids (2955 cc vs. 2010 cc, p =0.02), and length of operation (269 min vs. 178 min, p = 0.02). From these results we concluded that mortality associated with endovascular repair of thoracic aorta remains significant. Patients with a history of MI had a higher perioperative cardiac event rate. Intraoperative predictors of perioperative cardiac events included blood loss, IV fluid requirement, and length of operation. Perioperative beta-blockade is important in endovascular thoracic surgery as a protection against postoperative cardiac events. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern California Vascular Surgical Society, Carlsbad, CA, April 11-13, 2003.     

Cardiac risk stratification in patients undergoing endoluminal graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a single-institution experience with 365 patients

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair have a high incidence of coexisting cardiac disease. The traditional cardiac risk stratification for open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery may not apply to patients undergoing endoluminal graft exclusion. The purpose of this study was to examine predictive risk factors for perioperative cardiac events. METHODS: As part of multiple prospective endograft trials approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, data for 365 patients who underwent endoluminal graft repair from 1996 to 2001 were collected. Variables included for analysis were age and sex; history of smoking; presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or renal insufficiency; Eagle clinical cardiac risk factors; American Society of Anesthesiologists index; type of anesthesia administered; estimated blood loss; preoperative hemoglobin level; preoperative use of beta-blocker therapy; duration of surgery; need for iliac artery conduit; and concomitant other vascular procedures. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine which variables were predictive of an adverse perioperative cardiac event, eg, Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), severe arrhythmia, and unstable angina. RESULTS: The study cohort included 322 men and 43 women (mean age, 74.2 years). Fifty-two (14.2%) postoperative cardiac events occurred: severe dysrhythmia in 15 patients (4.1%), MI in 14 patients (3.8%), non-Q wave MI in 8 patients (2.2%), CHF in 8 patients (2.2%), and unstable angina in 7 patients (1.9%). Univariate analysis demonstrated that age 70 years or older (P =.034), history of MI (P =.018), angina (P =.004), history of CHF (P <.001), two or more Eagle risk factors (P <.001), and lack of use of preoperative beta-blocker therapy (P =.005) were predictors of perioperative cardiac events. Multivariate analysis identified only age 70 years or older (P =.026), history of MI (P =.024) or CHF (P =.001), and lack of use of preoperative beta-blocker therapy (P =.007) as independent risk factors for an adverse cardiac event. CONCLUSIONS: Age 70 years or older, history of MI or CHF, and lack of use of preoperative beta-blocker therapy are independent risk factors for perioperative cardiac events in patients undergoing endoluminal graft repair.     

Application of clinically valid cardiac risk factors to aortic aneurysm surgery

The operative outcome of 97 consecutive nonruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysms is analyzed regarding clinically identifiable cardiac risk factors. Clinically evident coronary artery disease was present in 45 patients (46%). Operative mortality was 4% (four cardiac deaths) with an additional 4% nonfatal postoperative myocardial infarction rate. All cardiac complications occurred in patients with clinically evident coronary artery disease, while no mortality occurred in 52 patients lacking a preoperative history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or angina. Preoperative risk factors having a significant negative influence on outcome include a history of prior myocardial infarction and compensated congestive heart failure. Few patients with aneurysms who have clinical evidence of coronary artery disease are indicated for coronary arteriography and bypass prior to aneurysm repair. Furthermore, indications for invasive cardiac screening of the patient with an aneurysm who lacks cardiac symptoms are limited.     

外科手术在肾下腹主动脉瘤治疗中的地位(附187例手术经验)

目的：就肾下型腹主动脉瘤的治疗经验，讨论外科手术的实用性和前途。方法：回顾分析1992年1月至2004年2月择期行肾下型腹主动脉瘤切除术187例，将其结果与经腔内治疗者作比较。结果：围手术期死亡1例(0．54％)，死亡原因是术后6h出现频发室性早搏、室颤，诱发大面积心肌梗死。手术时间平均为3．8h；出血量平均470ml．输血量445ml。ICU内恢复时间为12～24h。围手术期并发症包括心力衰竭17例，呼吸衰竭8例，急性心肌梗死2例，急性脑梗死1例，急性肾功能衰竭3例，无术后严重出血或失血性休克发生，也无下肢动脉栓塞发生。术后1、3、5年生存率分别为97．0％、84．6％及78.3％，随访期间病人死亡者的原因与腹主动脉瘤和手术无关。经腔内治疗手术目前仍有较高的中、远期并发症。结论：瘤体直径不能作为手术适应证的唯一指标。术前同时应确切评价全身重要脏器功能。影响腹主动脉瘤手术的危险因素主要是高龄、严重心、肺疾患及肾功能不全等。迄今，经腹手术仍是治疗腹主动脉瘤的主要方法。     

Long-term durability of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE: In multiple comparisons of open vs endovascular (EVAR) repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms, the prior assumption that open repair produced superior durability has been challenged by advocates of EVAR. Although focus on EVAR reintervention has been intense, few contemporary studies document late outcomes after open repair; this was the goal of this study. METHODS: From January 1994 to December 1998 (chosen to ensure a minimum 5-year follow-up), 540 patients underwent elective open repair. Surveillance imaging (computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging scans) was obtained for 152 (57%) of the 269 patients who remained alive at a mean follow-up of 87 months. Study end points included freedom from graft-related interventions and aneurysm-related and overall survival (Kaplan-Meier test); factors predictive of these end points were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The mean age at operation was 73 years. A total of 76% of patients were male; 11% had renal insufficiency (creatinine > or =1.5 mg/dL), and 13% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The aortic cross-clamp position was suprarenal in 135 (25%) patients, and 284 (53%) of patients had bifurcated grafts placed. Operative mortality (30 days) was 3%, and the median length of hospital stay was 7 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 68 (13%) patients. Predictors of postoperative complications included a history of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR], 2.0; P = .01) and renal insufficiency (HR, 2.5; P = .02). The mean follow-up for all patients was 87 months. Actuarial survival was 70.7% +/- 2% and 44.3% +/- 2.4% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Negative predictors of long-term survival included advanced age (HR, 1.1; P < .001), history of myocardial infarction (HR, 1.37; P = .02), and renal insufficiency (HR, 1.5; P = .04). Freedom from graft-related reintervention was 98.2% +/- 0.8% and 94.3% +/- 3.4% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. There were 13 late graft-related complications in 11 (2%) patients (mean follow-up, 7.2 years). Findings included seven anastomotic pseudoaneurysms (five were repaired), four graft limb occlusions, and two graft infections. Aneurysms were identified in noncontiguous arterial segments in 68 (45%) of 152 patients, most of which involved the iliac arteries and required no treatment because of small size. Late aortic aneurysms proximal to the repair were identified in 24% of patients, and 29 (19%) patients had multiple late synchronous aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Open repair remains a safe and durable option for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms, with an excellent associated 10-year survival in patients who undergo operation at 75 years of age or younger. In addition, the freedom from graft-related reintervention is superior to that of EVAR. Finally, continued surveillance after open repair is appropriate and should be directed toward the detection of other aneurysms.     

Isolated iliac artery aneurysms: a contemporary comparison of endovascular and open repair

OBJECTIVE: Iliac artery aneurysms are rare but associated with significant morbidity and mortality when ruptured. This study compares recent open and endovascular repairs of iliac aneurysms at a single institution. METHODS: Patients were identified and charts reviewed using ICD-9 and CPT codes for iliac artery aneurysm and open or endovascular repair performed between January 2000 and January 2006. Baseline characteristics, procedure-related variables, and follow-up data were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were treated with isolated iliac artery aneurysms. There were 19 open and 52 endovascular repairs. Seven presented with acute ruptures and were treated by open (4) or endovascular (3) repair. Preoperative comorbidities were similar between the two groups. Major perioperative (30 day) complications included three deaths in the open group from cardiovascular complications, all after ruptured aneurysm repair, and one death in the endovascular group (after rupture; one additional perioperative death occurred after 30 days due to colonic infarction) (P = NS). Postoperative complications were less frequent in the endovascular group, although this did not reach statistical significance. The mortality was 50% in the open group and 33% in the endovascular group for patients presenting with a ruptured aneurysm (P = NS). Transfusion requirement was significantly higher in the open group (47%) than in the endovascular group (6%) (P = .03). The mean follow-up was 20 +/- 5 months in the open group and 17 +/- 2 months in the endovascular group (P = NS). Long-term complications included two limb thromboses following repair with a bifurcated stent graft that were treated with thrombolysis plus stenting or a fem-fem bypass. Three endoleaks were identified on postop CT scans, all of which were successfully managed with endovascular techniques. There were no postoperative ruptures or aneurysm-related death. The mean postoperative length of stay was 5.2 +/- 2.3 days (open) and 1.3 +/- 1.0 days (endovascular) (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large, case control study comparing open vs endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysms. Endovascular repair of iliac artery aneurysms is safe and results in decreased length of stay, lower requirement for perioperative blood transfusion, and similar intermediate term outcomes as open repair.     

Changing predictors of postoperative mortality in acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES: Rapid emergency transport and early diagnosis and surgical treatment for acute type A aortic dissection have improved postoperative survival, which has, however, plateaued at about 80%. End-organ malperfusion is regarded as a strong predictor of postoperative mortality, replacing factors such as cardiac tamponade complications, aortic rupture, and left ventricular dysfunction due to aortic insufficiency. It is thus important to reevaluate risk factors for surgical death to assess current therapeutic strategies. METHODS: We statistically analyzed potential risk factors for perioperative death in 88 patients undergoing surgical repair for type A aortic dissection between January 1990 and December 1999. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that cardiopulmonary arrest (adjusted odds ratio: 13.78; p < 0.01) and malperfusion of more than 1 vital organ (adjusted odds ratio 4.97, p < 0.01), especially myocardial ischemia due to coronary artery dissection (adjusted odds ratio 3.21, p < 0.05), significantly increased the likelihood of operative death. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed only cardiopulmonary arrest (p < 0.01) and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting necessitated in cases complicated by evolving myocardial infarction (p < 0.05) to be independent predictors of postoperative mortality. CONCLUSION: Preoperative complication from coronary dissection was the most important predictor of early postoperative mortality in this series. In such cases, rapid surgical intervention before myocardial infarction develops is vital to saving lives.     

Endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND: Para-anastomotic aneurysms involving the aorta and iliac arteries can occur years after aortic surgery and are at risk for rupture and erosion into surrounding structures. We report on our continued experience with patients who have been treated for these lesions with endovascular management as an alternative to traditional open repair. METHODS: Patients who underwent endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aneurysms involving the distal aortic arch, descending thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta, or iliac arteries were prospectively followed up in a database. Patient comorbidities, initial aortic pathology, initial graft configuration, aneurysm characteristics, evidence of infection, type and configuration of endograft used, and follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: From 1997 to 2006, 53 patients with 65 para-anastomotic aneurysms were treated with endovascular stent grafts. Patients who were originally treated for aortoiliac occlusive disease presented significantly later than those treated for aneurysmal disease (15.8 vs 8.9 years, P < .01) The initial technical success rate was 98%. Endoleaks were identified in six patients (11%) < or =1 month of surgery, and three required reintervention, including open conversions. Endoleak complications were significantly associated with patients who had symptomatic para-anastomotic aneurysms (P = .01). Perioperative mortality after endovascular repair was 3.8%. Overall mortality within a mean follow-up of 18 months was 49% and was significantly associated with older age at the time of endovascular treatment (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aneurysms involving the aorta and iliac arteries is technically feasible and is associated with a low perioperative morbidity and mortality. Close follow-up is required to identify endoleaks. Long-term survival is limited in older patients. We recommend endovascular stent graft repair for para-anastomotic aneurysms in anatomically suitable patients.     

Randomisierte Studienlage zur Therapie des Bauchaortenaneurysmas

In four studies (EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE) on the treatment of asymptomatic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) patients were randomly allocated to either endovascular or surgical treatment. Patients with an AAA ≥5 cm, physical fitness and anatomical suitability were included for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). The EVAR procedure for AAA showed a lower risk of perioperative mortality but was associated with a higher cardiovascular and aneurysm-related complication rate. In mid-term and long-term follow-up there were no differences in survival after EVAR and open aortic repair (OAR). While OAR was associated with higher cardiovascular perioperative mortality, EVAR demonstrated higher mortality in the follow-up period due to cardiac and aneurysm-related complications. Both treatment options can therefore be considered as equal and can both be offered to patients. The EVAR procedure should be the first choice of treatment of AAA in physically fit patients with suitable anatomy and OAR should be preferred when EVAR does not seem to be technically feasible or for patients where lifelong surveillance is not possible. No significant differences were observed regarding quality of life, sexual dysfunction or costs of treatment.     

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the multifocal atherosclerotic patient

One of the major problems of treating aortic aneurysms has been the multifocal nature of atherosclerotic disease. Co-existing cardiovascular disease in the majority of patients together with chronic obstructive airways disease, renal impairment and hostile abdomen in some, has resulted in 1/3 of patients presenting with aortic aneurysms being regarded as high risk and unfit for open repair. Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm therefore has much to recommend it since it avoids the need for laparatomy, cross clamping of the aorta and the obligatory blood loss associated with opening of the sac. Between May 1992 and March 2003 we have used the endovascular method to repair abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in 583 patients. Successful repair was achieved in 563 patients (96%). The remaining 20 patients required primary conversion to open repair at the original operation. The 30-day perioperative mortality rate was 13 of 583 (2.2%). In this paper we summarise a number of studies that we have undertaken, comparing endovascular with alternative treatment methods and comparing various types of endovascular prostheses. In addition we report the long-term outcome of endovascular AAA repair as it relates to morphological changes in the proximal neck out to 9 years from operation. We conclude that despite the continuing small incidence of device failure, endovascular is the preferred method of AAA repair in the multifocal atherosclerotic patient. This view is based on the low perioperative mortality, superior survival compared with open repair and our experience of long-term stability in the proximal neck in the majority of patients.     

Lessons learned in adopting endovascular techniques for treating abdominal aortic aneurysm

HYPOTHESIS: Endovascular exclusion of abdominal aortic and common iliac aneurysms can be performed safely, and in the short term represents a feasible alternative to traditional, open aneurysm repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients were treated with endovascular grafts for 39 abdominal aortic and 2 common iliac artery aneurysms. RESULTS: All devices were successfully deployed. The size of the abdominal aortic aneurysms varied from 4.9 to 11.9 cm (average, 6.13 cm). The median procedure time was 195 minutes. There was one iliac artery rupture, which required celiotomy for repair. The hospital stay varied from 2 to 39 days (average, 6.7 days). The perioperative mortality rate was 2.4%. Sixteen patients (39%) had groin wound complications. Ten patients (24%) had evidence of contrast (endoleak) within the aneurysm sac on completion of the procedure. There were no obvious direct leaks from either the point of proximal or distal fixation. Seven of these endoleaks have resolved spontaneously. Two patients required additional procedures in the postoperative period to treat endoleak. The final patient has evidence of persistent endoleak on 3-month surveillance computed tomography scan. Major late problems occurred in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with large abdominal aortic aneurysms and considerable cardiac comorbidity can safely undergo endovascular aneurysm repair. Femoral groin wound complications resulting in prolonged hospitalization remain the major cause of perioperative morbidity. In contradistinction to open aneurysm repair, long-term surveillance is essential to detect migration of the device and identify flow within the residual aneurysm sac-complications that could lead to aneurysm rupture following endovascular repair.     

Postoperative myocardial ischemia in thoracic aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND: To determine the incidence and predictors of postoperative myocardial ischemia in non-coronary risk patients undergoing surgery for thoracic aortic aneurysms. METHODS: DESIGN: a prospective, observational study. SETTING: a general intensive care unit in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: twenty patients without ischemic heart disease, scheduled for elective surgical repair of thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. INTERVENTIONS: all patients underwent aortic replacement with prosthetic graft and routine postoperative care. Patients who developed myocardial ischemia received an infusion of coronary vasodilators. RESULTS: ECG episodes of myocardial ischemia were defined as reversible ST-segment changes of either >1 mm of depression or >2 mm of elevation at the J point. All patients survived operation. Eleven patients (ischemia group) developed myocardial ischemia, and 9 patients did not (non-ischemia group). These episodes were transient in 8 cases, but lasted longer than 3 days in 3 cases. In univariate analysis of perioperative factors between the two groups, the use of total cardiopulmonary bypass (p<0.01), the cardiac index at ICU admission (p<0.05), and the incidence of pre-existent hypertension (p<0.05) were significantly different. Multiple regression analysis identified the use of total cardiopulmonary bypass as the only predictor of myocardial ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: The use of total cardiopulmonary bypass is predictive of perioperative myocardial ischemia in surgery for thoracic aortic aneurysms, probably due to the production of proinflammatory cytokines by systemic ischemia and reperfusion. Prophylactic use of coronary vasodilators may be validated in these cases.     

Open repair of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms (JAA) remains a safe option in the era of fenestrated endografts

OBJECTIVES: Widespread application of infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has resulted in a proportionate increase in open juxtarenal aortic aneurysm (JAA) repairs. Fenestrated endograft technology for JAA is developing rapidly, but only limited outcomes are known. The aim of this study was to review our open JAA experience in an era of fenestrated endograft technology, identify factors associated with increased surgical risk, determine early and midterm outcome, and provide a basis for comparison for future endovascular procedures. METHODS: Data from 126 consecutive patients who underwent elective JAA repair requiring suprarenal aortic clamping from 2001 to 2006 were analyzed retrospectively. Electronic medical chart reviews were used to record 30-day complication rates. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with surgical morbidity. Mail-out questionnaires and telephone surveys were conducted to determine long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Ninety-eight males and 28 females (median age 74 years; range 55 to 93) were included in the study. Preoperative risk factors included: coronary artery disease (CAD) 58%, pulmonary disease 41%, renal insufficiency (serum creatinine [Cr] > 1.5mg/dL) 17%, and diabetes 9%. Fifteen patients underwent concomitant renal artery revascularization. Mean operative time was 319 minutes (range 91 to 648). Thirty-day mortality was 1/126 (0.8%). Median hospital length of stay was 7 days (range 3 to 85); median intensive care unit length of stay was 2 days (1 to 64). Complications included renal insufficiency (Cr increase > 0.5 mg/dL) in 22 (18%), cardiac in 17 (13%), and pulmonary in 14 (11%). Five patients required temporary hemodialysis; only one after hospital dismissal. Mean follow-up was 48 months (range 9-80). On multivariate analysis, age > or = 78 years (P = .001), male gender (P = .04), hypertension (P =.01), previous myocardial infarction (P = .047), and diabetes (P =.009) were predictive of cardiac complications. Renal artery revascularization (P = .01) and prior MI (P = .04) were multivariate predictors of pulmonary complications. Both prolonged operative (> or =351 minutes, P = .02) and renal ischemia (> or =23 minutes, P =.004) times predicted postoperative renal insufficiency. One, 3, and 5-year cumulative survival rates were 93.9%, 78.3%, and 63.8%, respectively and were not significantly different than an age- and gender-matched sample of the US population (P = .16). Mortality was not predicted by any specific risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Open surgical repair of JAA is associated with low mortality and remains the gold standard. Although 18% had renal complications, only one patient had permanent renal failure. Patients with a combination of physiologic and anatomic risk factors identified on multivariate analysis may benefit from fenestrated endograft repair.     

Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Analysis of postoperative morbidity

Between 1980 and 1986, 101 nondissecting thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) were repaired at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Overall mortality was 15% with a 9.6% mortality for elective repair. Nonfatal complications occurred in 44% of patients and included myocardial infarction in 9%, paraplegia in 5%, and renal failure in 4%. In an attempt to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with TAAA repair, one of our vascular surgical services set up a routine protocol of preoperative evaluation, standardized operative technique, and specific guidelines for perioperative management. Fifty-five of the 101 patients underwent elective repair on this service without the use of shunts or bypass. Mortality was reduced to 1.8% and the rate of myocardial infarction was reduced to 1.8%; none of these patients developed renal failure. However, paraplegia/paraparesis still occurred in 5.4% and pulmonary insufficiency occurred in 29%. Preoperative cardiac evaluation and intraoperative reduction of cardiac afterload are important factors in reducing myocardial infarction and death associated with TAAA repair and should be integrated into the management of these patients. However, preexisting pulmonary and renal disease in some patients may limit the surgeon's ability to reduce rates of some complications.     

Open repair of aortic aneurysms involving the renal vessels

This retrospective review examines the open surgical repair of intact juxtarenal (JRAAs) and suprarenal (SRAAs) aortic aneurysms to estimate effects on survival and renal function. Patients undergoing open repair of JRAA and SRAA were identified. Preoperative medical comorbidities and perioperative and late outcomes were recorded. Primary end points were survival (perioperative and long-term survival) and changes in renal function (acute tubular necrosis [ATN], acute dialysis, and late functional decline). Associations between outcomes and clinical variables were examined using univariate and multivariate techniques. Between December 1996 and September 2006, 678 patients underwent open repair of aortic aneurysms, including 150 aneurysms involving the renal vessels (134 JRAAs, 16 SRAAs). Perioperative mortality was 3% and long-term survival was 69% at 5 years. Fourteen percent of patients experienced ATN, and 7% required acute in-hospital dialysis. Late renal function remained unchanged or improved in 75%. These results demonstrate a perioperative mortality and renal complication rate in keeping with previous reports of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs involving the renal vessels. Future implementation of branch and fenestrated aortic endografts to treat similar aneurysms should approximate these results prior to widespread acceptance.     

Predictors of survival following open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Clinical decision making for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) weighs risk of aneurysm rupture, treatment hazards, and overall survival expectations. AAA diameter is the primary parameter in assessing rupture risk. Perioperative risk assessment has been extensively studied, and in-hospital mortality has been reduced to less than 8% with higher-risk open repair and less than 3% with endovascular repair. The purpose of this report is to determine risk factors that predict 2-year survival following open and endovascular AAA repair. We studied 334 patients enrolled in a multicenter clinical trial evaluating an endovascular graft in comparison to standard open repair of infrarenal AAA. Demographic, medical history, physical examination, laboratory, anatomic, procedural, and standardized risk score system variables were analyzed in a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Overall survival was 89% at 2 years. Heart disease, cancer, and stroke were the most common causes of death, and no deaths were due to AAA rupture. Cox modeling demonstrated that there were several independent predictors for death after AAA repair: smaller body mass index (p=0.005), Society for Vascular Surgery pulmonary risk score >or=1 (p=0.005), history of erectile dysfunction (p=0.008), history of heart valve replacement (p=0.008), lower preoperative platelet count (p=0.012), larger ratio of AAA diameter/proximal neck diameter (p=0.020), and lower ankle-brachial index (p=0.031). Age, gender, and open or endovascular treatment group are not significant independent risk factors for 2-year mortality in this study. Clinical, laboratory, and anatomic factors predict survival after open and endovascular repair of AAAs. With progressive reduction of in-hospital mortality, assessment of patient longevity after AAA repair has become a more important factor in clinical decision making. Use of valid predictors of patient survival will optimize resource utilization and improve overall patient outcomes. Better selection of patients for any method of repair may improve overall utility more than choice of open or endovascular techniques.