A comparative study of the fluoroquinolone antibacterial agents on the action potential duration in guinea pig ventricular myocardia

We examined the effects of ten fluoroquinolone antibacterial agents, levofloxacin, sitafloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gemifloxacin, tosufloxacin, gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, moxifloxacin and sparfloxacin, on action potentials recorded from guinea pig ventricular myocardia. Sparfloxacin prolonged action potential duration (APD) by about 8% at 10 microM and 41% at 100 microM. Gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin and moxifloxacin also prolonged APD at 100 microM by about 13%, 24% and 25%, respectively. In contrast, levofloxacin, sitafloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gemifloxacin and tosufloxacin had little or no APD-prolonging effect at concentrations as high as 100 microM. These findings suggest that there are differences in potency to prolong QT interval among the fluoroquinolones.     

Fluoroquinolones, the cornerstone of treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic approach

Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are important drugs to treat drug-resistant tuberculosis. In this review we integrated pharmacokinetic properties (PK) and microbiological susceptibility against M. tuberculosis and eventually evaluated the pharmcodynamic (PD) properties, as well as the influence of co-administered agents on these characteristics, for the currently used FQs (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin) in TB treatment. Future FQs that are being developed may overcome the problems with FQs that are used in daily practice. Therefore PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of novel FQs (clinafloxacin, garenoxacin, lomefloxacin, sitafloxacin, sparfloxacin, trovafloxacin, gemifloxacin, grepafloxacin and DC-159a) were evaluated in TB treatment as well. Integrating both excellent PK and PD properties, moxifloxacin, possibly at a higher dosage, may fulfil a far more important role in the treatment of multi-drug and early-generation FQ resistant TB than proposed in the current WHO guideline. Sparfloxacin, trovafloxacin and sitafloxacin are upcoming novel FQs that may be useful for drug-resistant TB based on their favourable PK properties or microbiological susceptibility against M. tuberculosis. Finally, the 8-methoxy moiety, as present in the chemical structure of MFX, will possibly provide DC- 159a with promising PK/PD characteristics and consequently this FQ may develop into a key FQ in future drug resistant TB treatment.     

In vitro activity of sitafloxacin compared with several fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus anginosus and Streptococcus constellatus

The in vitro activities of sitafloxacin and seven other fluoroquinolones a (ciprofloxacin, tosufloxacin, sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, T-3811ME, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin) were examined by the microdilution method against 79 clinically isolated 'Streptococcus milleri' group (SMG) microorganisms. No statistically significant differences were found between the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC(50) and MIC(90)) against Streptococcus anginosus and Streptococcus constellatus. Sitafloxacin was the most active agent of the eight fluoroquinolones tested against SMG, with a MIC(90) of 0.06 microg/mL, which was 8 times more active than ciprofloxacin and 16 times more active than levofloxacin. Although none of the SMG strains showed high resistance to any of the fluoroquinolones tested, three agents (trovafloxacin, sitafloxacin and T-3811ME) had low MICs against 23 SMG strains against which levofloxacin had a MIC> 1 microg/mL. In conclusion, several fluoroquinolones have low MICs against SMG, but sitafloxacin has the lowest.     

Inhibitory and bactericidal activities of gemifloxacin and other antimicrobials against Mycoplasma pneumoniae

The MIC of gemifloxacin was compared with that of sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, erythromycin, azithromycin and clarithromycin using 97 clinical isolates of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. MBCs of fluoroquinolones were determined for a subgroup of 12 isolates. Macrolides were the most potent agents with MIC₉₀s for all drugs 0.001 mg/l. The doxycycline MIC₉₀ was 0.5 mg/l. Gemifloxacin MICs ranged from 0.001 to 0.25 mg/l. The gemifloxacin MIC₉₀ (0.125 mg/l) was equivalent to moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin, was 2-fold lower than sparfloxacin, 8-fold lower than levofloxacin and 32-fold lower than ciprofloxacin. MBCs for gemifloxacin were predominantly within 2–4 times the corresponding MIC values, indicating a bactericidal effect.     

New antibiotics for community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections: improved activity at a cost?

Opinions are changing as to the continued validity of traditional beta-lactam and macrolide therapy of community acquired LRTI, partly because of resistance and partly because of early evidence that suggests that some new agents may be more effective. Guidelines are altering to reflect this view, although there is conflicting evidence on their effects on outcome. Fluoroquinolones are becoming accepted in the treatment of community acquired pneumonia and are established choices for acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The 8-methoxy fluoroquinolones, moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin, have excellent anti-pneumococcal activity and may become drugs of choice for penicillin/macrolide resistant infections. They appear free of the serious idiosyncratic reaction profiles, possibly related to the immunologically reactive 1-difluorophenyl substituent, which characterised the recently withdrawn temafloxacin, trovafloxacin and tosufloxacin. All quinolones so far tested appear to prolong the QTc interval, but only sparfloxacin and grepafloxacin caused clinical effects. Nevertheless, caution is required until this effect is fully investigated.     

Mutagenesis induced by 12 quinolone antibacterial agents in Escherichia coli WP2uvrA/pKM101.

The mutagenic potential of 12 quinolone antibacterial agents (quinolones) was examined at concentrations of 3.91-1000 ng/plate with or without S9 mix in Escherichia coli WP2uvrA/pKM101. All quinolones showed mutagenic potential in the strain: the maximum numbers of revertant colonies were observed at 7.81 ng/plate for clinafloxacin and sitafloxacin; 15.63 ng/plate for ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and trovafloxacin; and 31.25-500 ng/plate for enoxacin, lomefloxacin, norfloxacin and ofloxacin. The numbers for all quinolones were comparable between the groups with and without S9 mix. In all quinolones, bactericidal effects were observed at one or two higher concentrations than their mutagenic concentrations except for enoxacin without S9 mix. From these results, the WP2uvrA/pKM101 strain is proved to be highly sensitive to quinolones.     

Comparative in vitro activity and pharmacodynamics of five fluoroquinolones against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare in vitro activity and pharmacodynamics of five fluoroquinolones against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. DESIGN: In vitro analysis. SETTING: University research laboratory. INTERVENTION: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for penicillin and five fluoroquinolones by E test for 201 S. pneumoniae isolates. Serum concentration-time profiles were simulated for the following regimens: ciprofloxacin 750 mg orally every 12 hours and 400 mg intravenously every 8 hours; levofloxacin 500 mg orally and intravenously every 24 hours; trovafloxacin 200 mg orally and intravenously every 24 hours; gatifloxacin 400 mg orally and intravenously every 24 hours; and clinafloxacin 200 mg orally and intravenously every 12 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Free 24-hour areas under the serum concentration-time curves (AUC0-24) were calculated using the trapezoidal rule, and the average AUC0-24:MIC ratio was calculated for each regimen. Differences in ratios among agents were determined by analysis of variance (Scheffe post hoc test, p < 0.05). For intravenous dosing, the average AUC0-24:MIC for gatifloxacin, clinafloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin was 146, 142, 122, 71, and 61, respectively. For both oral and intravenous regimens, gatifloxacin and clinafloxacin ratios were significantly greater than those for trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin (p < or = 0.007). Ratios for trovafloxacin were significantly greater than those for levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin (p < 0.0001), and levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin ratios were not significantly different from each other. CONCLUSION: Gatifloxacin and clinafloxacin achieve significantly higher AUC0-24:MIC ratios for S. pneumoniae than trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Large comparative studies are necessary to determine the clinical significance of these findings.     

Sensitivities of ciprofloxacin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates to fluoroquinolones: role of mutant DNA gyrase subunits in drug resistance

Minimum inhibitory concentrations of sitafloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, sparfloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against 59 ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Japan were determined. The isolates were most susceptible to sitafloxacin and gatifloxacin. To understand better the basis for drug resistance, nucleotide sequences encoding the gyrA and gyrB quinolone resistance-determining region were determined. Predicted amino acid sequences revealed distinct mutational patterns likely to be responsible for fluoroquinolone resistance. Double gyrA mutations as well as mutations in both gyrA and gyrB correlated with increased resistance to all fluoroquinolones.     

In vitro activity of gatifloxacin compared with gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against uropathogens cultured from patients with complicated urinary tract infections

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of gatifloxacin were compared with those of gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin using an agar dilution method for 400 uropathogens cultured from the urine of urological patients with complicated and/or hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (UTI). The collection of strains was made up of Enterobacteriaceae (34.5%), enterococci (31.5%), staphylococci (21.2%) and non-fermenting bacteria (12.8%). The antibacterial activity of the three newer fluoroquinolones, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, were similar, but showed some drug specific differences. Gemifloxacin was most active against Escherichia coli, but less so against Proteus mirabilis. In this series all isolates of E. coli were inhibited at a MIC of 0.25 mg/l gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin and by 0.125 mg/l gemifloxacin. The MIC distribution of all fluoroquinolones showed a bimodal distribution for staphylococci, enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The two modes for P. aeruginosa were 1 and 64 mg/l for gemifloxacin and moxifloxacin and 0.5 and 64 mg/l for gatifloxacin. For staphylococci the two modes were 0.125 and 2 mg/l for gatifloxacin, 0.03 and 4 mg/l for gemifloxacin, and 0.03 and 2 mg/l for moxifloxacin; for enterococci, 0.25 and 16 mg/l for gatifloxacin, 0.06 and 2 mg/l for gemifloxacin, and 0.25 and 8 mg/l for moxifloxacin. Compared with trovafloxacin the MICs were similar, but the newer fluoroquinolones were more active than ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against Gram-positive bacteria. Of the newer fluoroquinolones gatifloxacin had the highest rate of renal excretion and could be considered a promising alternative fluoroquinolone agent for the treatment of UTI.     

Moxifloxacin: new preparation. A me-too with more cardiac risks

(1) Moxifloxacin is the fourth fluoroquinolone to be licensed in France with indications covering ENT and respiratory tract infections. (2) In community-acquired pneumonia, acute bacterial sinusitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, moxifloxacin seems no more effective than other fluoroquinolones available in France (with which it has not been compared) or the other antibiotics with which it has been compared. (3) Moxifloxacin has the usual adverse effects of fluoroquinolones, but carries a greater risk of QT prolongation than ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and ofloxacin.     

Gatifloxacin: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.

Gatifloxacin is an 8-methoxy fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent. The drug has a broader spectrum of antibacterial activity than the older fluoroquinolones (e.g. ciprofloxacin) and shows good activity against many Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, atypical organisms and some anaerobes. Notably, gatifloxacin is highly active against both penicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, a common causative pathogen in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute sinusitis and acute bacterial exacerbations of bronchitis. Gatifloxacin is absorbed well from the gastrointestinal tract (oral bioavailability is almost 100%). Therefore, patients can be switched from intravenous to oral therapy without an adjustment in dosage. High concentrations of gatifloxacin are achieved in plasma and target tissues/fluids. Gatifloxacin has a long plasma elimination half-life, thus allowing once-daily administration. Few clinically significant interactions between gatifloxacin and other drugs have been reported. In patients with CAP, clinical response rates in recipients of intravenous/oral gatifloxacin 400 mg/day ranged from 86.8 to 98.0% and rates of bacterial eradication ranged from 83.1 to 100% (up to 28 days post-treatment). Gatifloxacin showed efficacy similar to that of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone (with or without erythromycin) with or without stepdown to clarithromycin, levofloxacin or clarithromycin. Gatifloxacin was as effective as clarithromycin or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and was significantly more effective (in terms of clinical response; p < 0.035) than 7 to 10 days' treatment with cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. In acute sinusitis, gatifloxacin showed clinical efficacy similar to that of clarithromycin, trovafloxacin or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Genitourinary infections were also successfully treated with gatifloxacin. Gatifloxacin is generally well tolerated. Its tolerability profile was broadly similar to those of comparator agents in comparative trials. The most common adverse events are gastrointestinal symptoms (oral formulation) and injection site reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Gatifloxacin has an extended spectrum of antibacterial activity and provides better coverage of Gram-positive organisms (e.g. S. pneumoniae) than some older fluoroquinolones. The drug has favourable pharmacokinetic properties, is administered once daily and is at least as well tolerated as other fluoroquinolones. Gatifloxacin is a useful addition to the fluoroquinolones currently available for use in the clinical setting and has an important role in the management of adult patients with various bacterial infections. As with other fluoroquinolones, careful control of gatifloxacin usage in the community is important in order to prevent the emergence of bacterial resistance and thus preserve the clinical value of this agent.     

Comparative in vitro activity of gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin against 4151 Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms

Gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin are fluoroquinolones with enhanced Gram-positive activity while retaining broad-spectrum activity against Gram-negative pathogens. Levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin are older quinolones with broad activity against Gram-negative pathogens and borderline activity against some Gram-positive organisms. We compared the in vitro activity of these compounds against 4151 Gram-negative and -positive organisms. Gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin were highly active against penicillin sensitive and resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus agalactiae. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin were active but less potent. All compounds were highly active (overall) against Gram-negative pathogens with ciprofloxacin being the most active agent against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Our data indicate that the advanced fluoroquinolones will be important compounds for treating infections caused by Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens.     

Comparative in vitro activity of gemifloxacin to other fluoroquinolones and non-quinolone agents against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis in the United States in 1999-2000

This study was undertaken to assess the in vitro activity of gemifloxacin, five other fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents (ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and ofloxacin) and other non-quinolone comparator agents (ampicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, doxycycline, penicillin and trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole) against Streptococcus pneumoniae collected in the United States. Susceptibility testing of 550 S. pneumoniae, 290 Haemophilus influenzae and 205 Moraxella catarrhalis showed that 38.2% of pneumococci were penicillin nonsusceptible, while 26.2 and 95.6% of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis, respectively, produced beta-lactamase. Overall new fluoroquinolones were the most active agents. The in vitro activity (based on MIC90 in mg/l) of the six fluoroquinolones was gemifloxacin>moxifloxacin>gatifloxacin>levofloxacin>ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin.     

Sitafloxacin hydrate for bacterial infections

Sitafloxacin hydrate (DU-6859a, Gracevit(R)), a new-generation, broad-spectrum oral fluoroquinolone that is very active against many Grampositive, Gram-negative and anaerobic clinical isolates, including strains resistant to other fluoroquinolones, was recently approved in Japan for the treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections. Sitafloxacin is active against methicillinresistant staphylococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae and other streptococci with reduced susceptibility to levofloxacin and other quinolones and enterococci. Sitafloxacin has also demonstrated activity against clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae (including about 67% of strains producing extendedspectrum, beta-lactamases and resistant to ciprofloxacin), Enterobacter cloacae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa with some activity against quinolone-resistant strains and Acinetobacter baumannii. The in vitro activity against anaerobes is comparable to imipenem or metronidazole. In a published phase II randomized, open-label, multicenter study of patients hospitalized with pneumonia, sitafloxacin (400 mg once daily) was comparable to imipenem/cilastatin (500 mg three times a day). Results of the phase III trials of sitafloxacin are not available in English. The clinical safety profile of sitafloxacin has been characterized from 1,059 patients who participated in 10 clinical trials. The most common events with 50 or 100 mg twice daily were gastrointestinal disorders (17.2%), mostly diarrhea, and abnormal laboratory test results (16.2%), mostly liver enzyme elevations. For Japanese patients, sitafloxacin provides the broadspectrum coverage promised by clinafloxacin and trovafloxacin and comparable to carbapenems. While it is currently limited by its potential for phototoxicity in Caucasians, phototoxicity is essentially irrelevant if sitafloxacin is used in hospitals and especially in intensive care units.     

Guide to selection of fluoroquinolones in patients with lower respiratory tract infections

Newer fluoroquinolones such as levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and gemifloxacin have several attributes that make them excellent choices for the therapy of lower respiratory tract infections. In particular, they have excellent intrinsic activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and the atypical respiratory pathogens. Fluoroquinolones may be used as monotherapy to treat high-risk patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, and for patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalisation, but not admission to intensive care. Overall, the newer fluoroquinolones often achieve clinical cure rates in > or =90% of these patients. However, rates may be lower in hospital-acquired pneumonia, and this infection should be treated on the basis of anticipated organisms and evaluation of risk factors for specific pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this setting, an antipseudomonal fluoroquinolone may be used in combination with an antipseudomonalbeta-lactam.Concerns are now being raised about the widespread use, and possibly misuse, of fluoroquinolones and the emergence of resistance among S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa. A number of pharmacokinetic parameters such as the peak concentration of the antibacterial after a dose (C(max)), and the 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) and their relationship to pharmacodynamic parameters such as the minimum inhibitory and the mutant prevention concentrations (MIC and MPC, respectively) have been proposed to predict the effect of fluoroquinolones on bacterial killing and the emergence of resistance. Higher C(max)/MIC or AUC24/MIC and C(max)/MPC or AUC24/MPC ratios, either as a result of dose administration or the susceptibility of the organism, may lead to a better clinical outcome and decrease the emergence of resistance, respectively. Pharmacokinetic profiles that are optimised to target low-level resistant minor subpopulations of bacteria that often exist in infections may help preserve fluoroquinolones as a class. To this end, optimising the AUC24/MPC or C(max)/MPC ratios is important, particularly against S. pneumoniae, in the setting of lower respiratory tract infections. Agents such as moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin with high ratios against this organism are preferred, and agents such as ciprofloxacin with low ratios should be avoided. For agents such as levofloxacin and gatifloxacin, with intermediate ratios against S. pneumoniae, it may be worthwhile considering alternative dose administration strategies, such as using higher dosages, to eradicate low-level resistant variants. This must, of course, be balanced against the potential of toxicity. Innovative approaches to the use of fluoroquinolones are worth testing in further in vitro experiments as well as in clinical trials.     

Levofloxacin: an updated review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections

Levofloxacin is the L-form of the fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent, ofloxacin. In in vitro studies, levofloxacin demonstrated a broad range of activity against Gram-positive and -negative organisms and anaerobes. The drug is more active against Gram-positive organisms than ciprofloxacin, but less active than newer fluoroquinolones such as gatifloxacin. Its activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae is unaffected by the presence of penicillin resistance. In several randomised controlled trails, 5 to 14 days' treatment with intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin proved an effective therapy for upper and lower respiratory tract infections. In patients with mild to severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin 500mg once or twice daily was as effective as intravenous and/or oral gatifloxacin, clarithromycin, azithromycin or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Overall, clinical response rates with levofloxacin ranged from 86 to 95% versus 88 to 96% with comparator agents; bacteriological response rates were 88 to 95% and 86 to 98%, respectively. Sequential (intravenous +/- oral switch) therapy with levofloxacin 750mg once daily was as effective as intravenous imipenem/cilastatin (+/- oral switch to ciprofloxacin) in patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia. Generally, oral levofloxacin 250 or 500mg once daily was at least as effective as oral cefaclor, cefuroxime axetil, clarithromycin or moxifloxacin in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis as assessed by either clinical or bacteriological response rates. This approach also provided similar efficacy to amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid or clarithromycin in patients with acute sinusitis. Sequential therapy with levofloxacin 500mg twice daily for 7 to 14 days' was as effective as intravenous imipenem/cilastatin in patients with suspected bacteraemia. Oral levofloxacin 500mg once daily for 7 to 10 days was also an effective treatment in patients with uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections, and in those with complicated urinary tract infections. A higher dosage of sequential levofloxacin 750mg once daily proved as effective as intravenous ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (+/- oral switch to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid) in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections. Pharmacoeconomic studies suggest that levofloxacin may be cost-saving in comparison to conventional therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin continues to demonstrate good clinical efficacy in the treatment of a range of infections, including those in which S. pneumoniae is a potential pathogen. Importantly, it has efficacy in CAP similar to that of gatifloxacin and at least as good as that of the third generation cephalosporins. Extensive clinical data confirm the good tolerability profile of this agent without the phototoxicity, hepatic and cardiac events evident with some of the other newer fluoroquinolone agents. Levofloxacin therefore offers a unique combination of documented efficacy and tolerability, and provides an important option for the treatment of bacterial infections.     

In vitro susceptibility of 4903 bacterial isolates to gemifloxacin--an advanced fluoroquinolone

The in vitro activity of gemifloxacin against over 4900 bacterial isolates was determined by microbroth dilution with interpretation in accordance with NCCLS guidelines. Susceptibility results were compared with those for ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. Gemifloxacin and the other fluoroquinolones were not affected by either beta-lactamase production or penicillin-resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. The MIC90 values for gemifloxacin were: S. pneumoniae 0.063 mg/l; Haemophilus influenzae 0.016 mg/l; Moraxella catarrhalis 0.008 mg/l, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus 0.063 mg/l; methicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pyogenes 0.031 mg/l; Enterobacteriaceae 0.031-0.16 mg/l; Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4 mg/l; Neisseria meningitidis 0.008 mg/l. The MIC90 for gemifloxacin was lower than those for the other quinolones tested against S. pneumoniae (ciprofloxacin 2-4 mg/l, gatifloxacin 0.5 mg/l, levofloxacin 1-2 mg/l, moxifloxacin 0.25 mg/l). This study confirms the enhanced potent activity of gemifloxacin against Gram-positive pathogens, its broad-spectrum, Gram-negative activity and indicates that gemifloxacin is likely to have an important role in treating patients with Gram-positive and/or Gram-negative infections.     

Fluoroquinolone-induced renal failure.

Fluoroquinolones are generally well tolerated, clinically useful antimicrobials. This paper highlights rare, but potentially serious, adverse effects involving the kidney. Other antimicrobials have long been known to cause various forms of nephrotoxicity occurring as allergic interstitial nephritis, granulomatous interstitial nephritis, necrotising vasculitis, allergic tubular nephritis or a tubular necrosis. A Medline search (1985 to May 1999) of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, trovafloxacin, enoxacin, sparfloxacin, grepafloxacin, gatifloxacin, clinafloxacin and moxifloxacin was conducted to ascertain the incidence and features of fluoroquinolone nephrotoxicity. Unfortunately, the data primarily consist of case reports and temporally related events. The incidence of these adverse effects is hard to estimate, and the cause may be multifactorial. While the use of ciprofloxacin appears to increase the risk, this may be due to its longer and more widespread use when compared with the newer agents.     

Comparative activities of six different fluoroquinolones against 9,682 clinical bacterial isolates from 20 European university hospitals participating in the European SENTRY surveillance programme

The in-vitro activities of gatifloxacin, trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin were tested against 9,682 clinical bacterial isolates from 20 European university hospitals participating in the European SENTRY surveillance programme. Gatifloxacin and trovafloxacin exhibited the highest activities against Gram-positive cocci, while levofloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and gatifloxacin were the most active against Enterobacteriaceae. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin showed the highest antimicrobial activities against Pseudomonas spp., while gatifloxacin and trovafloxacin were the most active against Acinetobacter spp. and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. All Haemophilus spp. and Moraxella catarrhalis isolates were fully susceptible to all quinolones tested. Overall, the new quinolones, showed improved activity against Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative non-fermenters while retaining their broad-spectrum activity against Gram-negative bacilli.     

Gatifloxacin in community-acquired respiratory tract infection

Gatifloxacin (Tequin, Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd) is a new fluoroquinolone with a broad spectrum of activity for pathogens implicated in community-acquired respiratory tract infections, including Gram-positive, -negative and atypical bacteria. Excellent oral bioavailability, a half-life allowing once-daily administration and excellent penetration into respiratory tissues are desirable pharmacokinetic characteristics of gatifloxacin. Monte Carlo simulation of gatifloxacin in Streptococcus pneumoniae infection demonstrates that adequate levels of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters are obtained with gatifloxacin in almost all instances. In randomised, controlled trials and a large open-label, community-based study, gatifloxacin has shown excellent clinical and bacteriological efficacy in acute bacterial sinusitis, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and community-acquired pneumonia. Current guidelines recommend the initial empiric use of gatifloxacin (along with the other new fluoroquinolones) for community-acquired respiratory tract infection in patients who have increased likelihood of infection with resistant pathogens. Another group of patients where this agent is recommended for initial antimicrobial therapy are those who, because of underlying disease and/or comorbid conditions, need an antibiotic with high antimicrobial efficacy to achieve optimal outcomes.