DMBA-induced mammary pathologies are angiogenic in vivo and in vitro

We have previously shown that human pre-invasive diseases of the breast are angiogenic. In addition, normal epithelium from women with coincident or subsequent invasive breast cancer is more vascular than normal epithelium from women with no breast cancer. To develop a model in which to study the regulation of angiogenesis in pre-invasive mammary pathologies, we examined 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced rat mammary tissues for the presence of neovascularization in pre-invasive histopathologies. These studies included morphometric analysis of tissue vascularity in pre-invasive lesions. In addition, we isolated fresh tumors and histologically normal epithelium (organoids) from DMBA or vehicle-treated control rats to test their ability to induce endothelial cell tubule formation in vitro. Finally, we examined tumors for their ability to produce vascular endothelial cell growth factor. The morphometric studies documented that with epithelial progression, the ability of individual cells to elicit angiogenesis increases. The in vitro studies showed that isolated tumors from these animals stimulate angiogenesis. Furthermore, normal epithelium from DMBA-treated rats is more angiogenic than epithelium from control animals. Finally, DMBA-induced tumors produce vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mRNA, therefore, DMBA-induced mammary tumorigenesis is one model in which to test the dependency of progression on angiogenesis.     

TNP-470 inhibits 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced mammary tumor formation when administered before the formation of carcinoma in situ but is not additive with tamoxifen

In many women pathologic lesions, such as hyperplasia and carcinoma in situ, precede invasive breast cancer. We have shown that tissue vascularity increases with histologic progression to invasive disease. Similarly, in the well-characterized 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) model of mammary tumorigenesis, preinvasive lesions exhibit increased vascularity with progression. Using this model we asked whether inhibition of angiogenesis would block progression and if so, at which stage. We treated rats with DMBA followed by the potent angiogenic inhibitor, TNP-470, and/or tamoxifen starting 1 day or 6 weeks later. Histopathology and in vitro angiogenic potential of mammary organoids were evaluated 3 months after DMBA. All statistical tests were two-sided. Early TNP-470 and tamoxifen treatment inhibited the formation of carcinoma in situ (p < 0.001) and invasive disease (p < 0.001). However, their effects were not additive, despite their unique mechanisms of action. TNP-470 administration begun at the time of microscopic carcinoma in situ formation was unable to prevent the further development of carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer, whereas tamoxifen was highly effective (p = 0.001). There was no added benefit of combining TNP-470 and tamoxifen. TNP-470 therapy, unlike tamoxifen, did not inhibit the angiogenic potential of DMBA-treated normal mammary organoids, supporting its lack of a direct effect on the epithelium. These data provide proof-in-principle that inhibition of angiogenesis early in mammary tumorigenesis prevents mammary tumor formation in a hormone-sensitive model, indicating that angiogenesis is a potential target for cancer chemoprevention. Interactions with other chemopreventive strategies and the timing of administration must be thoroughly examined in vivo.     

Expression of angiogenic factors is upregulated in DMBA-induced rat mammary pathologies.

OBJECTIVE: In the 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) model of rat mammary carcinogenesis, microvascular density and angiogenic potential increase with progression from normal to invasive disease, but the mechanisms involved are unknown. Using RT-PCR, we determined the expression of angiogenic regulators in DMBA-induced intraductal hyperplasia (IDP), carcinoma in situ (CIS), invasive tumors (INV), as well as normal tissue. METHODS: RT-PCR was performed on frozen tissue sections of each type of pathology for factors known to regulate angiogenesis in other systems. RESULTS: MMP-2, MMP-9, uPA, PAI-1, IGF-2, BFGF, VEGF, ANG-1, IRS-1, and TSP-1 were significantly (p < or =0.05) upregulated in CIS and INV, whereas TIMP-1, ANG-2, MASPIN, IGF1-R and HBEGF were unchanged. IGF-1 was uniquely elevated in IDP. SPARC was downregulated in CIS. Inhibition of IGF-1R by the tyrphostin, AG1024, blocked endothelial tubulogenesis in vitro, confirming that IGF-1 functions as a regulator of angiogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the involvement of specific angiogenic mediators in mammary tumor formation. Angiogenesis at different stages of tumorigenesis may be regulated by unique factors.     

Peritumoral brain edema in angiomatous supratentorial meningiomas: an investigation of the vascular endothelial growth factor A pathway

The aim of this work was to study the vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF‐A) pathway and peritumoral brain edema (PTBE) through comparison of non‐angiomatous and angiomatous meningiomas. Meningiomas are common intracranial tumors, which often have PTBE. VEGF‐A is an integral part of PTBE formation and angiogenesis, and the capillary‐rich angiomatous meningiomas are known for their PTBE. The VEGF‐A receptor VEGFR‐2 is responsible for the angiogenic effect of VEGF‐A on endothelial cells, which is enhanced by the co‐receptor neuropilin‐1. Forty non‐angiomatous, 22 angiomatous meningiomas, and 10 control tissue samples were collected for the study. Magnetic resonance images were available for 40 non‐angiomatous and 10 angiomatous meningiomas. Tissue sections were immunostained for CD34, MIB‐1, estrogen‐ and progesterone receptors. ELISA, chemiluminescence, and RT‐qPCR were used for VEGF‐A, VEGFR‐2, and neuropilin‐1 protein and mRNA quantification. Angiomatous meningiomas had larger PTBE (695 vs 218 cm³, p = 0.0045) and longer capillary length (3614 vs 605 mm/mm³, p < 0.0001). VEGF‐A mRNA, neuropilin‐1 mRNA, and VEGFR‐2 protein levels were higher in angiomatous meningiomas independently of the capillary length (p < 0.05). Neuropilin‐1 protein levels were lower in angiomatous meningiomas (p < 0.0001). The VEGF‐A pathway and tumor capillary length may be essential for PTBE‐formation in meningiomas. Further investigations of this pathway could lead to earlier therapy and targeted pharmacological treatment options.     

Infectious angiogenesis: Bartonella bacilliformis infection results in endothelial production of angiopoetin-2 and epidermal production of vascular endothelial growth factor

Pathological angiogenesis, the development of a microvasculature by neoplastic processes, is a critical component of the development of tumors. The role of oncogenes in the induction of angiogenesis has been extensively studied in benign and malignant tumors. However, the role of infection in inducing angiogenesis is not well understood. Verruga peruana is a clinical syndrome caused by the bacterium Bartonella bacilliformis, and is characterized by the development of hemangioma-like lesions, in which bacteria colonize endothelial cells. To gain insight into how this bacteria induces angiogenesis in vivo, we performed in situ hybridization of clinical specimens of verruga peruana for the angiogenesis factors vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), its receptors VEGFR1 and VEGFR2, and angiopoietin-2. High-level expression of angiopoietin-2 and VEGF receptors was observed in the endothelium of verruga peruana. Surprisingly, the major source of VEGF production in verruga peruana is the overlying epidermis. Infection of cultured endothelium with B. bacilliformis also resulted in induction of angiopoetin-2 in vitro. These findings imply a collaboration between infected endothelium and overlying epidermis to induce angiogenesis.     

Neuropilin-1 Participates in Wound Angiogenesis

Angiogenesis, the formation of new capillaries from existing vasculature, plays an essential role in tissue repair. The rapid onset and predominance of proangiogenic factors optimizes healing in damaged tissues. One factor that directly mediates wound vessel angiogenesis is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Although much is known about the biology of VEGF and its cognate receptors, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2, the role of a recently identified co-receptor for VEGF, neuropilin-1, is not well understood. Using a murine model of dermal wound repair, we found that neuropilin-1 was abundantly expressed on new vasculature in healing wounds. Moreover, mice treated with anti-neuropilin-1 antibodies exhibited a significant decrease in vascular density within these wounds (67% decrease, P = 0.0132). In in vitro assays, VEGF induced formation of endothelial cord-like structures on collagen gel and endothelial cell migration toward VEGF was inhibited by antibodies directed against neuropilin-1. These results provide both in vitro and in vivo evidence for a critical role of neuropilin-1 in wound angiogenesis.     

Inactivation of the PTEN gene protein product is associated with the invasiveness and metastasis, but not angiogenesis, of breast cancer

PTEN is a novel tumor-suppressor gene located on chromosomal band 10q23. Loss of PTEN function has been implicated in the progression of several types of cancer, but the correlation between loss of PTEN expression and advanced carcinomas is not well established. The capacity for angiogenesis of a tumor is known to play a very important role in growth and metastasis, and there have been reports that PTEN relates to angiogenesis. In the present study, formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tissues from 101 patients with breast carcinomas, including 88 cases of invasive ductal carcinomas and 13 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), were evaluated by immunohistochemical methods for the expression of PTEN and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), as well as microvessel density (MVD). The results were compared with the clinicopathologic parameters. There was no loss of PTEN expression in any of the cases of DCIS, but 28 (32%) of the 88 invasive cases did not express PTEN. Loss of PTEN expression was associated with lymph node metastasis ( P  = 0.03), but did not correlate with tumor size, tumor grade, MVD or recurrence. VEGF expression significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal carcinoma ( P  = 0.01). There was no correlation between the expression of PTEN and that of VEGF ( P  = 0.63). The present study suggests that loss of PTEN expression is common and correlates with tumor progression and lymph node metastasis in breast carcinoma. The relationship between loss of PTEN and progression of breast cancer may not be explained by modulation of angiogenesis.     

Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1 and 2 in invasive breast carcinoma: prognostic significance and relationship with markers for aggressiveness

Dhakal H P, Naume B, Synnestvedt M, Borgen E, Kaaresen R, Schlichting E, Wiedswang G, Bassarova A, Holm R, Giercksky K‐E & Nesland J M
(2012) Histopathology  61, 350–364 Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1 and 2 in invasive breast carcinoma: prognostic significance and relationship with markers for aggressiveness Aims: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR‐1) and VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR‐2) play a role in breast cancer growth and angiogenesis. We examined the expression and relationship with clinical outcome and other prognostic factors. Methods and results: Tumour sections from 468 breast cancer patients were immunostained for VEGF, VEGFR‐1, and VEGFR‐2, and their relationships with tumour vascularity, disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) in bone marrow and other clinicopathological parameters were evaluated. VEGF, VEGFR‐1 and VEGFR‐2 immunoreactivities were observed in invasive breast carcinoma cells. VEGF expression was significantly associated with VEGFR‐1 and VEGFR‐2 expression (P < 0.001). High‐level cytoplasmic expression of VEGFR‐1 was associated with significantly reduced distant disease‐free survival (DDFS) (P = 0.017, log‐rank) and breast cancer‐specific survival (BCSS) (P = 0.005, log‐rank) for all patients, and for node‐negative patients without systemic treatment (DDFS, P = 0.03, log‐rank; BCSS, P = 0.009, log‐rank). VEGFR‐1 expression was significantly associated with histopathological markers of aggressiveness (P < 0.05). Significantly reduced survival was observed in DTC‐positive patients as compared with DTC‐negative patients in the combined moderate/high VEGFR‐1 group (P < 0.001 for DDFS and BCSS), and the same was true for DDFS in the moderate VEGFR‐2 group (P = 0.006). Conclusions: High‐level expression of VEGFR‐1 indicates reduced survival. Higher‐level expression of VEGFR‐1 or VEGFR‐2 in primary breast carcinomas combined with the presence of DTC selects a prognostically unfavourable patient group.     

黄芪注射液对体外血管新生的影响

背景：血管新生受生长因子的影响,黄芪可与血管内皮生长因子具有协同促血管新生的功效,但机制尚不明确。 目的：通过与单一血管内皮生长因子干预比较,观察中药黄芪对体外血管新生的作用机制。 方法：将黄芪注射液及血管内皮生长因子作用于SD大鼠胸主动脉内皮细胞,应用细胞增殖、细胞迁移、小管形成实验观察黄芪注射液对体外血管新生的促进作用,用Western blot实验检测血管内皮生长因子的表达。 结果与结论：黄芪能明显促进大鼠胸主动脉内皮细胞的增殖(P < 0.01),迁移的细胞数增加(P < 0.01),胸主动脉内皮细胞的小管形成数增加(P < 0.01),并明显促进内皮细胞血管内皮生长因子的表达(P < 0.01)。说明黄芪能明显促进内皮细胞增殖、细胞迁移、小管形成,具有显著的促进体外血管新生作用,其机制可能是通过增加血管内皮生长因子的表达而实现的。     

VEGF-mediated signal transduction in lymphatic endothelial cells

The VEGF family of angiogenic ligands consists of VEGFA, VEGFB, VEGFC, VEGFD and placenta growth factor, PlGF. These growth factors bind in an overlapping pattern to three receptor tyrosine kinases, denoted VEGFR1, VEGFR2 and VEGFR3. Originally, VEGFA (the prototype VEGF) was described as a master regulator of vascular endothelial cell biology in vitro and in vivo, transducing its effect through VEGFR2. VEGFA, VEGFB and PlGF bind to VEGFR1, which is a negative regulator of endothelial cell function at least during embryogenesis. VEGFC and VEGFD were identified as lymphatic endothelial factors, acting via VEGFR3. With time, the very clear distinction between the roles of the VEGF ligands in angiogenesis/lymphangiogenesis has given way for a more complex pattern. It seems that the biology of the different VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 ligands overlaps quite extensively and that both receptor types contribute to angiogenesis as well as lymphangiogenesis. This paradigm shift in our understanding is due to the access to more sophisticated reagents and techniques revealing dynamic and plastic expression of ligands and receptors in different physiological and pathological conditions. Moreover, knowledge on the important role of VEGF coreceptors, the neuropilins, in regulating the responsiveness to VEGF has changed our perception on the mechanism of VEGF signal transduction. This review will primarily focus on the properties of VEGR3, its signal transduction and the resulting biology.     

Predictors of disease progression in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and vascular patterns

Breast carcinoma-induced angiogenesis helps meet growing metabolic needs of tumors and progressively increases with malignant transformation of benign ducts to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive carcinoma. There are conflicting data regarding the difference in angiogenesis in low-, intermediate-, and high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. If angiogenesis is related to ductal carcinoma in situ progression, the types of ductal carcinoma in situ with more aggressive biologic potential would have different vascular patterns than the less aggressive ones. In this study, we classified 51 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ as low (10-20 years to progression to invasive carcinoma), moderate, or high aggressive (2-5 years to progression to invasive carcinoma), based on criteria outlined by Tsikitis and Chung (Am J Clin Oncol 2006; 29:305), which takes into account nuclear grade, mitotic rate, Ki-67, Her2Neu, P53, estrogen, and progesterone receptor expression. We correlated these 3 groups of ductal carcinoma in situ with the extent of periductal and stromal vascularity and the presence and type of vascular breaks. No association of aggressive biologic behavior of ductal carcinoma in situ with any vascular pattern was found. Moreover, no correlation was found between vascular patterns and classifiers of aggressiveness, microvascular density, or outcome (local recurrence, invasive carcinoma, or metastatic disease). To validate our cohort, we confirmed expected correlations of all measured parameters of aggressiveness by correlating them with each other. In summary, vascular patterns in ductal carcinoma in situ do not correlate with the predictors of aggressive behavior, suggesting that the biologic potential of ductal carcinoma in situ is independent of angiogenesis.     

Genetic ablation of the alpha 6‐integrin subunit in Tie1Cre mice enhances tumour angiogenesis

Laminins are expressed highly in blood vessel basement membranes and have been implicated in angiogenesis. α6β1‐ and α6β4‐integrins are major receptors for laminins in endothelial cells, but the precise role of endothelial α6‐integrin in tumour angiogenesis is not clear. We show that blood vessels in human invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast have decreased expression of the α6‐integrin‐subunit when compared with normal breast tissue. These data suggest that a decrease in α6‐integrin‐subunit expression in endothelial cells is associated with tumour angiogenesis. To test whether the loss of the endothelial α6‐integrin subunit affects tumour growth and angiogenesis, we generated α6fl/fl‐Tie1Cre+ mice and showed that endothelial deletion of α6‐integrin is sufficient to enhance tumour size and tumour angiogenesis in both murine B16F0 melanoma and Lewis cell lung carcinoma. Mechanistically, endothelial α6‐integrin deficiency elevated significantly VEGF‐mediated angiogenesis both in vivo and ex vivo. In particular, α6‐integrin‐deficient endothelial cells displayed increased levels of VEGF‐receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and VEGF‐mediated downstream ERK1/2 activation. By developing the first endothelial‐specific α6‐knockout mice, we show that the expression of the α6‐integrin subunit in endothelial cells acts as a negative regulator of angiogenesis both in vivo and ex vivo. Copyright © 2009 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Expression of VEGF,semaphorin SEMA3F,and their common receptors neuropilins NP1 and NP2 in preinvasive bronchial lesions,lung tumours,and cell lines

Two receptors, neuropilin 1 (NP1) and neuropilin 2 (NP2), bind class 3 semaphorins, axon guidance molecules including SEMA3F, the gene for which was isolated from a 3p21.3 deletion in lung cancer. In addition, they bind VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), enhancing the effects of VEGF binding to KDR/Flk-1. Elevated VEGF levels are associated with the loss and cytoplasmic delocalization of SEMA3F in lung cancer, suggesting competition for their NP1 and NP2 receptors. To determine the timing of these events, we compared by immunohistochemistry VEGF, SEMA3F, NP1 and NP2 expression in 50 preneoplastic lesions and 112 lung tumours. In preneoplastic lesions, VEGF increased from low-grade to high-grade dysplasia (p=0.001) whereas SEMA3F levels remained low. NP1 and NP2 levels increased from dysplasia to microinvasive carcinoma (p=0.0001) and correlated with VEGF expression (p=0.04 and 0.0002, respectively). Non-small cell lung carcinoma overexpressed VEGF and NP1 and NP2 significantly more often than neuroendocrine tumours including small cell lung carcinoma. SEMA3F loss or delocalization correlated with advanced tumour stage. Migrating cells overexpressed VEGF, SEMA3F, NP1 and NP2 with cytoplasmic delocalization of NP1 as demonstrated in an in vitro wound assay. These results demonstrate early alteration of the VEGF/SEMA3F/NP pathway in lung cancer progression.     

Homologs of vascular endothelial growth factor and receptor, VEGF and VEGFR, in the jellyfish Podocoryne carnea.

Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) are the major inducers of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in vertebrates. Their effects are mediated by receptor tyrosine kinases of the VEGF receptor (VEGFR) family located on endothelial cells and include stimulation of cell survival, proliferation, migration, and tube formation as well as regulation of vascular permeability. Here, we report the presence of VEGF and VEGFR homologous genes in a basal invertebrate of the phylum Cnidaria. The marine jellyfish Podocoryne carnea features a gastrovascular system consisting of the feeding organ, or manubrium, the radial and ring canals, and the tentacle bulbs. Expression analysis indicates that both genes are involved in tentacle and gastrovascular canal formation, indicating an early recruitment of the VEGF signalling pathway for morphogenetic processes leading to tube formation in metazoans. The evolutionary origin of the VEGF signalling pathway resides in the common ancestor of the Cnidaria and Bilateria.     

Vascular endothelial growth factor overproduced by tumour cells acts predominantly as a potent angiogenic factor contributing to malignant progression

To elucidate the role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an endothelial cell-specific mitogen, in tumour angiogenesis and malignant progression, an expression vector harboring human VEGF cDNA was stably transfected into three human cancer cell lines with poor VEGF productivity. Though their in vitro growth rate and intrinsic productivity of another angiogenic factor, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), were not changed by transfection, those clones with higher VEGF production were endowed with tumorigenic and angiogenic potentials as follows: firstly, nontumorigenic, lung carcinoma QG90 cells having lower bFGF productivity acquired tumorigenicity as well as significant in vivo angiogenesis-inducing ability, secondly, tumorigenic colorectal carcinoma RPMI4788 cells having higher potency for bFGF production could form more vascularized solid tumour with faster growth rate and thirdly, oestrogen-dependent breast carcinoma MCF-7 cells, which did not produce detectable bFGF, acquired tumorigenicity even in the absence of oestrogen and the solid tumour growth rate was remarkably enhanced, accompanied with increased vascularization, in the presence of oestrogen. These results suggest that tumour progression closely depends on angiogenesis, and VEGF significantly contributes to malignant progression of a variety of tumour cells through its potent angiogenic activity, independent on the bFGF productivity of tumour cells.     

Altered ratios of pro‐ and anti‐angiogenic VEGF‐A variants and pericyte expression of DLL4 disrupt vascular maturation in infantile haemangioma

Infantile haemangioma (IH), the most common neoplasm in infants, is a slowly resolving vascular tumour. Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF‐A), which consists of both the pro‐ and anti‐angiogenic variants, contributes to the pathogenesis of IH. However, the roles of different VEGF‐A variants in IH progression and its spontaneous involution is unknown. Using patient‐derived cells and surgical specimens, we showed that the relative level of VEGF‐A₁₆₅b was increased in the involuting phase of IH and the relative change in VEGF‐A isoforms may be dependent on endothelial differentiation of IH stem cells. VEGFR signalling regulated IH cell functions and VEGF‐A₁₆₅b inhibited cell proliferation and the angiogenic potential of IH endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo. The inhibition of angiogenesis by VEGF‐A₁₆₅b was associated with the extent of VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) activation and degradation and Delta‐like ligand 4 (DLL4) expression. These results indicate that VEGF‐A variants can be regulated by cell differentiation and are involved in IH progression. We also demonstrated that DLL4 expression was not exclusive to the endothelium in IH but was also present in pericytes, where the expression of VEGFR2 is absent, suggesting that pericyte‐derived DLL4 may prevent sprouting during involution, independently of VEGFR2. Angiogenesis in IH therefore appears to be controlled by DLL4 within the endothelium in a VEGF‐A isoform‐dependent manner, and in perivascular cells in a VEGF‐independent manner. The contribution of VEGF‐A isoforms to disease progression also indicates that IH may be associated with altered splicing. © 2016 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.     

丁苯酞通过激活VEGF/VEGFR2-Notch1/Dll4信号促进HUVECs形成血管

目的:探索缺血缺氧(H/I)条件下丁苯酞(NBP)通过激活血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)/VEGF受体2(VEGFR2)-Notch1/Delta样配体4(Dll4)信号促进人脐静脉内皮细胞(HUVECs)血管形成的机制。方法:利用无血清培养基和缺氧罐模拟H/I条件,HUVECs传代培养后设置正常对照(control)组、H/I组、NBP高剂量(H/I+NBP_(high))组和NBP低剂量(H/I+NBP_(low))组,其中control组为常规培养的HUVECs,H/I组为H/I条件下培养的HUVECs,H/I+NBP_(high)组为在H/I环境下使用20μmol/L丁苯酞干预的HUVECs,H/I+NBP_(low)组为在H/I环境下使用5μmol/L丁苯酞干预的HUVECs。CCK-8法检测各组细胞的细胞活力,细胞划痕实验检测各组细胞的迁移能力,体外血管形成实验检测各组细胞成管能力,Western blot法检测VEGFR2、Notch1和Dll4的表达,ELISA法检测培养基中VEGF的表达,qPCR检测VEGF、VEGFR2、Notch1和Dll4的mRNA表达水平。结果:丁苯酞可以提高H/I条件下HUVECs的存活率,促进细胞的迁移和体外血管的形成能力,且H/I+NBP_(high)组比H/I+NBP_(low)组更加显著。丁苯酞可以提高VEGF、VEGFR2、Notch1和Dll4的mRNA及蛋白表达。结论:丁苯酞可以在H/I条件下促进HUVECs形成血管,其机制可能与VEGF/VEGFR2-Notch1/Dll4信号的激活有关。     

VEGF分泌量及分泌来源对肿瘤血管生长影响的数值模拟

目的 数值模拟研究血管内皮生长因子（vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF）分泌量及分泌来源对肿瘤血管生成的影响。方法 建立肿瘤内外血管生成的二维离散数学模型。围绕VEGF的分泌及其诱导新生血管形成肿瘤富血管区的过程,考虑细胞外基质的旁分泌作用以及对内皮细胞运动的趋触作用,以微血管密度作为定量指标,探讨VEGF的分泌量及不同的分泌来源对血管生成的影响。结果 肿瘤增殖细胞区、VEGF高浓度区、富血管区三者统一,微血管密度与VEGF的表达有关,随着增殖细胞区域的扩大,即VEGF的表达越来越多,微血管密度也越来越大,但在不同类型的肿瘤中,VEGF不同分泌来源的比重与微血管密度无明显相关性。结论 模型探讨了VEGF分泌量及分泌来源对肿瘤血管生成的影响,其中对VEGF的不同分泌来源的考虑可作为研究靶向VEGF治疗肿瘤的模型基础。     

Correlation between tumor vascularity, vascular endothelial growth factor production by tumor cells, serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels, and serum angiogenic activity in patients with breast carcinoma.

Angiogenesis is an important prognostic factor in invasive breast carcinoma. We analyzed sera and tumor samples from 36 patients with primary breast carcinomas to determine the relationship between tumor vascularity, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production by tumor cells, levels of circulating VEGF (measured by ELISA assay), and levels of endothelial growth factors analyzed by a functional test of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) proliferation. Tumor vascularity was correlated directly with VEGF production by the tumor, indicating that VEGF production is a relevant factor in determining angiogenesis in primary tumor. No correlation was found either between the number of vessels in the tumor or the production of VEGF by tumor cells and the levels of serum angiogenic factors including VEGF. On the contrary, the two serum tests correlated together because a high serum level of VEGF is more frequent in cases with the presence of HUVEC-stimulating growth factors. These data indicate that the principal source of factors stimulating angiogenesis in the primary tumor is the tumor itself. This is an important issue in the context of anti-angiogenic therapeutic approaches, which should be planned to interfere with tumor production of angiogenic factors rather than with circulating angiogenic factors. In conclusion, whereas the vessel count and VEGF production by tumor cells are parameters that give direct information on tumor angiogenesis, long-term follow-up is necessary to determine the clinical significance of the determination of serum HUVEC-stimulating factors in the progression of breast carcinoma.