Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Rectal Cancer

Background

Cytoreductive surgery (CS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the treatment most likely to achieve prolonged survival in peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Yet the efficacy of HIPEC in rectal patients is controversial because of the retroperitoneal location of the primary tumor. Therefore, we reviewed our experience in patients with PC from a rectal primary tumor.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of 950 HIPEC procedures was performed. Performance status, age, albumin level, prior surgical score, resection status, morbidity, mortality, and survival were reviewed.

Results

A total of 13 and 204 patients with PC from rectal and colon cancer, respectively, were identified. Median follow-up was 40.1 and 88.1 months, respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score was zero or one for 92 % of patients with rectal cancer and 83 % for colon, while R1 resection was achieved in 54 and 51 %. The 30-day mortality was 5 % for colon cancer. There were no deaths in the rectal group. The morbidity for the colon and rectal groups was 57 and 46 %, respectively, with a 23 % 30-day readmission rate. In univariate analysis, age, ECOG, prior surgical score, albumin level, and node and resection status were not statistically significant in predicting survival for the rectal cancer patients. Median survival for the rectal and colon groups was 14.6 versus 17.3 months, while the 3-year survival was 28.2 versus 25.1 %.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrate similar 3-year survival for patients with rectal and colon cancer PC treated with CS/HIPEC. This can be attributed to patient selection bias. Selected rectal cancer PC patients should not be excluded from an attempted cytoreduction and HIPEC.     

细胞减灭术联合腹腔热灌注化疗治疗腹膜转移癌患者的护理

对21例发生腹膜转移癌患者行细胞减灭术加术中腹腔热灌注化疗,手术时间4～10 h,术后1 d出现低蛋白血症5例,术后5d发热1例,局部/全身性水肿2例,均经对症处理后好转;未出现切口感染、切口裂开、腹盆腔或全身感染,随访8～40个月,7例死亡,7例带瘤生存,7例无瘤生存.提出做好术前心理护理和准备;术后密切病情观察,做好引流管、营养支持和预防并发症的护理,可提高手术效果.     

Monitoring Health Outcomes Following Cytoreductive Surgery Plus Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Background Cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomitosis (PC) is an aggressive treatment designed to alleviate symptoms and prolong life. It is associated with physical and psychological morbidity. The purpose of this study was to monitor health outcomes related to treatment. Methods Patients completed a questionnaire before and after surgery at 3, 6 and 12 months. The questionnaire consisted of basic demographic items as well as the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Colon Scale (FACT-C), SF-36 Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey, Center for Epidemiologic Studies–Depression Scale (CES-D), Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form, and ECOG Performance Status Rating. Time trends were assessed with mixed models (SAS PROC MIXED) so as to use all data and to account for missing data. Results Ninety-six patients (49% females, 9% African Americans) of an average age of 52.9 (SD = 12.5) years were assessed before surgery. PC originated in primary lesions of the appendix (n = 36); colon/rectum (n = 24); mesothelium (n = 9); ovary (n = 5); stomach (n = 4); and miscellaneous (n = 18). Quality of life (QOL) and pain scores improved from baseline to 12 months. Physical functioning changed over the 12-month study period with improvement recorded at 6 months. The percentage of patients reporting significant depressive symptom at each time point was; baseline= 32%; 3 months= 19%; 6 & 12 months= 24%. Conclusions Acceptable QOL, return of functional status, and reduced pain can be attained between 3 and 6 months following treatment although some deficits in general health remain. Depressive symptoms are common and should be monitored.     

Safety of Gastric Resections During Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Background  Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) including gastric resection combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can improve the prognosis of selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. Perioperative morbidity of this aggressive treatment strategy is high; however, overall mortality can be low in specialized centers. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of gastric resections with anastomosis during CRS and HIPEC. Methods  Between 2005 and 2008, 204 patients underwent CRS and HIPEC at our tertiary referral centre. Of these, 37 procedures (male/female 24/13, median age 55 years) included gastric resections. The clinical data of all patients were introduced into a database and analyzed with respect to the morbidity associated with the gastric resections. Results  Of all patients included, 16 had pseudomyxoma peritonei, 11 gastric carcinoma, 4 ovarian carcinoma, 3 malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, and 3 colon carcinoma. Twenty-seven patients had previous surgery (n = 22) and/or systemic chemotherapy (n = 18). Fifteen total gastrectomies, 3 subtotal gastrectomies, 12 distal gastrectomies, and 7 gastric wedge resections were performed during CRS. The overall postoperative morbidity was 45%; main surgical complications were pancreatitis (n = 6), abdominal abscess (n = 4), bile leakage (n = 2), and digestive fistula (leakage of ileorectostomy and small bowel perforation) (n = 2). However, no complications occurred at the site of the esophageal anastomosis (n = 15), gastric anastomosis (n = 15) or gastric suture (n = 7). No patient died postoperatively during the hospitalization period. Conclusions  CRS in combination with HIPEC is associated with high postoperative morbidity; however, anastomosis following total or subtotal gastrectomy is safe in experienced centers. No leakages related to gastric resections occurred in this high-risk patient group. Pompiliu Piso and Przemyslaw Slowik have contributed equally to this study.     

Cytoreductive Surgery Combined With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Intraoperative Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Arising From Colon Adenocarcinoma

Background: Hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIIC) has been recently proposed to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from colon adenocarcinoma, which is usually regarded as a lethal clinical entity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of this combined treatment.Methods: A retrospective study of 46 patients treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis from colon adenocarcinoma was performed. Thirty-four patients were treated with complete cytoreductive surgery immediately followed by intraoperative HIIC with mitomycin C and cisplatin. The clinical outcome of these 34 patients was analyzed; the median follow-up period was 14.5 months.Results: No postoperative deaths were reported. The postoperative morbidity rate was 35%. No severe locoregional or systemic toxicity was observed. The 2-year overall survival was 31%, and the median survival time and the median time to local disease progression were 18 and 13 months, respectively. Survival and local disease control in patients with well- and moderately differentiated colon adenocarcinoma were significantly better than in those with poorly differentiated tumors.Conclusions: Considering the dismal prognosis of this condition, HIIC seems to achieve encouraging results in a selected group of patients affected with resectable peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from colon adenocarcinoma. These findings support the conduction of formal phase III randomized trials.     

Selection of Patients with Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis for Cytoreductive Surgery and Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Background Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been suggested as a treatment option for patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. However, the survival benefit is achieved at the expense of moderate to high perioperative morbidity and mortality. Methods This review summarized the important prognostic factors for survival; outlined the patient selection process from major peritonectomy centers, paying particular attention to preoperative evaluation; and identified areas for potential improvement. Emphasis was placed on a strict patient selection process to avoid futile aggressive treatments. Results Currently, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, and laparoscopy have been utilized in the preoperative evaluation process to identify potential surgical candidates. Patients with good performance status, low volume of peritoneal disease, and absence of extra-abdominal metastases are more likely to benefit from the combined treatment. Conclusions Quantitative assessment of the extent of disease is possible and should be performed at the time of primary cancer operation. Careful selection of patients to identify surgical candidates with favorable prognostic indicators is important.     

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Outcomes from a Single Tertiary Institution

Background

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective but morbid procedure in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. We report our outcomes at a single tertiary institution.

Method

A total of 170 consecutive patients underwent CRS-HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis between July 2007 and August 2012. The peritoneal cancer index (1–39) was used for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) staging. Mitomycin C (88.8 %) was administered intraperitoneally at 42 °C for 90 mins. Risk factors associated with major morbidities were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analyses.

Results

The mean age was 55.1 (±11.3) years, and the majority (77.1 %) of patients had complete cytoreduction (CC0-1). Tumor types included colorectal (n?=?51, 30.0 %), appendiceal (n?=?50, 29.4 %), pseudomyxoma peritonei (n?=?16, 9.4 %), and other (n?=?53, 31.2 %). Factors associated with major complications were estimated blood loss (>400 ml), length of stay (>1 week), intraoperative blood transfusion, operative time (>6 h), and bowel anastomosis. Intraoperative blood transfusion was the only independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (p?=?0.031). Median follow-up was 15.7 months (±1.2). The recurrence rates for colorectal and appendiceal carcinoma at 1 and 3 years were 40 %, 53.5 % and 68 %, 79.1 %, respectively. The 1- and 3-year overall survival for colorectal and appendiceal carcinomatosis was 74.0 %, 32.5 % and 89.4 %, 29.3 %, respectively. Intraoperative peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score (>16) and need for blood transfusion were factors independently associated with poor survival (p?<?0.05).

Conclusion

Our single institution experience of CRS/HIPEC procedures for peritoneal carcinomatosis demonstrates acceptable perioperative outcome and long-term survival. Optimal cytoreduction was achieved in the majority of cases. Intraoperative PCI?>?16 was associated with poor survival. This series supports the safety of CRS-HIPEC in selected patients.     

Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy With Mitomycin C for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Nonappendiceal Colorectal Carcinoma

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CS) and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (IPHC) are efficacious in patients with disseminated mucinous tumors of the appendix. We reviewed our experience using this approach for nonappendiceal colorectal cancer (NACC).Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of a prospective database for patients undergoing CS and IPHC with mitomycin C for peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal primary lesions between December 1991 and April 2002.Results: There were 77 patients, with a median age of 54 years. Peritoneal carcinomatosis was synchronous and metachronous in 27% and 73% patients, respectively. Seventy-five percent of patients (n = 58) had received chemotherapy prior to IPHC. Complete resection of all gross disease was accomplished in 37 patients (48%). The mean carcinoembryonic antigen level decreased from a preoperative value of 31.2 to a postoperative value of 6.9 (P < .0001). Overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, and 5 years was 56%, 25%, and 17%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 15 months, the median OS was 16 months. Perioperative morbidity and mortality were 30% and 12%, respectively. Hematologic toxicity occurred in 15 patients (19%). Cox regression analysis identified poor performance status (P = .018), bowel obstruction (P = .001), malignant ascites (P = .001), and incomplete resection of gross disease (P = .011) as independent predictors of decreased survival. Patients with complete resection of all gross disease had a 5-year OS of 34%, with a median OS of 28 months.Conclusions: CS and IPHC with mitomycin C can improve outcomes for select patients with peritoneal spread from NACC. One third of patients who undergo complete resection of gross disease have long-term survival.     

Long-Term Survivorship and Quality of Life After Cytoreductive Surgery Plus Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Background:Cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy with mitomycin C for peritoneal carcinomatosis is used as a palliative treatment for a variety of malignancies. The purpose of this study was to measure the quality of life (QOL) of survivors (>3 years) after treatment.Methods:Patients were interviewed by telephone with the following tools: (1) the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Colon (FACT-C), (2) the Short Form of the Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire, (3) the Center for Epidemiologic Studies–Depression scale, (4) the Life Appreciation scale, (5) the Psychosocial Concerns Questionnaire, and (6) performance status rating.Results:Seventeen (10 appendix, 5 large intestine, 1 ovarian, and 1 peritoneum) of 109 patients were interviewed from 3.1 to 8.0 years after treatment. Ten patients (62.5%) described their health as excellent or very good. No limitations on moderate activity were reported in 94% of cases. Paired t-tests were used to compare 10 patients who had baseline QOL data. FACT mean difference scores and P values (positive difference scores indicate improved QOL) were functional well-being: 4.9, P = .01; physical well-being: 3.3, P = .05; and FACT total: 14.3, P = .02.Conclusions:Long-term survival with good QOL is possible for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis after cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy.     

Cytoreductive Surgery Plus Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Patients with Peritoneal Metastases from Endometrial Cancer

Background

More information is needed for selection of patients with peritoneal metastases from endometrial cancer (EC) to undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Methods

This study analyzed clinical, pathologic, and treatment data for patients with peritoneal metastases from EC who underwent CRS plus HIPEC at two tertiary centers. The outcome measures were morbidity, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) during a median 5 year follow-up period. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify significant factors related to outcome.

Results

A total of 33 patients met the inclusion criteria and completed the follow-up period. At laparotomy, the median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 15 (range 3–35). The CRS procedure required a mean 8.3 surgical procedures per patient, and for 22 patients (66.6%), a complete cytoreduction was achieved. The mean hospital stay was 18 days, and major morbidity developed in 21% of the patients. The operative mortality was 3%. When surgery ended, HIPEC was administered with cisplatin 75 mg/m² for 60 min at 43 °C. During a median follow-up period of 73 months, Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated a 5 year OS of 30% (median 33.1 months) and a PFS of 15.5% (median 18 months). Multivariate analysis identified the completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score as the only significant factor independently influencing OS. Logistic regression for the clinicopathologic variables associated with complete cytoreduction (CC0) for patients with metachronous peritoneal spread from EC who underwent secondary CRS plus HIPEC identified the PCI as the only outcome predictor.

Conclusions

For selected patients with peritoneal metastases from EC, when CRS leaves no residual disease, CRS plus HIPEC achieves outcomes approaching those for other indications such as colon and ovarian carcinoma.

     

Predictive and Prognostic Survival Factors in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Appendiceal Cancer After Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Background

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has survival benefit in the treatment of selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from appendiceal cancer (AC). We evaluated factors affecting the survival of patients with PC from AC after CRS/HIPEC.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 387 CRS/HIPEC procedures performed between February 1998 and February 2013 identified 202 patients with PC from AC. Tumor histopathology, complete cytoreduction (CC 0–1), Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), and lymph node (LN) status were related to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

Overall, 129 women (64 %) and 73 men (36 %), mean age 54 years (range 25–81), with a mean follow-up of 36 months were included in the study. Seventy-seven low-grade tumors (disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis [DPAM]; 38 %) and 125 high-grade tumors (peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis [PMCA]; 62 %) were identified. Five- and 10-year OS was 56 % and 47 %, respectively, with PFS of 44 % at 5 and 10 years. Five-year OS in DPAM patients was 83 %, with a 5-year OS significant difference related to CC 0–1 versus CC 2–3 (incomplete cytoreduction) [p = 0.021]. Five-year OS in PMCA patients was 41 %, with a 5-year OS significant difference related to CC 0–1 versus CC 2–3 (p < 0.001), PCI <20 versus PCI ≥20 (p = 0.002), and (–)LN versus (+)LN (p < 0.001). Grade III/IV complications were 16 %. No perioperative mortality was reported.

Conclusion

Positive LN, PMCA histopathology, and PCI ≥20 are negative prognostic factors, while CC 0–1 is a positive survival predictor in PC from AC treated with CRS/HIPEC. However, in patients with PMCA and PCI ≥20 in whom CC 0–1 was a potential outcome should not be denied CRS/HIPEC.     

Survival and Quality of Life Following Cytoreductive Surgery Plus Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Colonic Origin

Background  

Peritoneal carcinomatosis of colonic origin (PCC) is a life-threatening diagnosis. Cytoreductive surgery (CS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) offers patients the prospect of long-term survival with alleviation of symptoms.     

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Peritoneal Sarcomatosis

Background  

The prognosis of peritoneal sarcomatosis is generally poor and conventional treatments for this disease process are mostly ineffective. The use of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as an aggressive locoregional treatment option remains controversial.     

Cytoreductive Surgery with Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Mitomycin Versus Cisplatin

Background  

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare, rapidly fatal disease. Because traditional treatments offer little benefit, there has been increasing interest in cytoreductive surgery (CS) with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (IPHC). The most efficacious chemotherapy regimen is not established. Herein we report clinical outcomes of MPM patients treated with CS and IPHC and contrast results using two chemoperfusates: mitomycin and cisplatin.     

Comparison of Prognostic Scores for Patients with Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Background

There are three prognostic scores for the cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) treatment of colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases: the newly introduced COREP (colorectal peritoneal) score, the peritoneal surface disease severity score (PSDS), and the prognostic score (PS). The aim was to determine which prognostic score had the best prognostic value.

Methods

Between 2006 and 2010, a total of 77 patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer underwent CRS/HIPEC treatment. The COREP, PSDS, and PS scores were successfully applied to 56 patients (73 %) having sufficient data. The end points were prediction of open-and-close cases (n = 9), R1 resections (n = 41), and survival of <12 months (n = 18). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (accuracy) was compared. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients not previously used for the development of the COREP score (n = 24). Multivariable logistic regressions of the three end points were performed as well as Cox regression for overall survival. Furthermore, COREP and peritoneal cancer index were compared.

Results

For open-and-close case prediction, accuracy for the whole group (n = 56) and subgroup (n = 24) was 87 and 88 %, respectively for COREP; 66 and 77 % for PSDS; and 68 and 78 % for PS. For R1 resection prediction, accuracy was 81 and 81 %, 76 and 78 %, and 75 and 77 %, respectively. For prediction of survival of <12 months, accuracy was 83 and 84, 54 and 67 %, and 55 and 56 %, respectively. The COREP score was the only independent prognostic factor in all four multivariable analyses. A COREP score of ≥6 identified patients with poor survival more accurately than a PCI of >20.

Conclusions

The COREP score predicted open-and-close cases, R1 resections, and poor survival better than PSDS and PS. COREP better identifies patients with poor survival than intraoperative PCI.     

Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Secondary to Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Appendix

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a radical but effective treatment option for select peritoneal malignancies. We sought to determine our early experience with this method for peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to mucinous adenocarcinomas of appendiceal origin. As such, we performed a retrospective clinical study of 30 consecutive patients undergoing CRS with planned HIPEC at the Princess Alexandra Hospital, between June 2009 to December 2012, with mucinous adenocarcinomas of the appendix. CRS was performed in 30 patients, 13 received HIPEC intraoperatively and 17 received early postoperative intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) in addition. Mean age was 52.3 years and median hospital stay was 26 days (range 12–190 days). Peritoneal cancer index scores were 0–10 in 6.7% of patients, 11–20 in 20% of patients and >20 in 73.3% of patients. Complete cytoreduction was achieved overall in 21 patients. In total, 106 complications were observed in 28 patients. Ten were grade 3-A, five were grade 3-B and one grade-5 secondary to a fatal PE on day 97. In patients who received HIPEC, there was no difference in disease-free survival (P = 0.098) or overall survival (P = 0.645) between those who received EPIC versus those who did not. This study demonstrates that satisfactory outcomes with regards to morbidity and survival can be achieved with CRS and HIPEC, at a single-centre institution with growing expertise in the technique. Our results are comparable with outcomes previously described in the international literature.Key words: Pseudomyxoma peritonei, Cytoreductive surgery, Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy, Early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapyThe combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective treatment option for select peritoneal malignancies.^1,2 The management centers on improving survival for a historically palliative disease. CRS aims to achieve complete tumor clearance, requiring extensive peritoneal and visceral resection. Once optimal cytoreduction is complete, HIPEC is employed intraoperatively and is selectively followed by early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). Direct delivery into the peritoneal cavity facilitates higher regional dosing and, because of decreased systemic exposure,³ is achieved with fewer toxicities, although the role for EPIC following HIPEC remains debatable.⁴Such an aggressive treatment comes with significant potential morbidity; thus, appropriate patient selection is vital.⁵ A considerable learning curve exists.⁶ However, with increasing experience, an institution can significantly reduce its morbidity and mortality.⁷Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes early in our experience with CRS and HIPEC at the Princess Alexandra Hospital, specifically for mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix, and compare these outcomes with those reported in the literature globally for primary end points such as morbidity, mortality, and survival. We further sought to determine the role of HIPEC with or without EPIC because the literature remains ambivalent on this topic to date.     

Outcomes Following Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with and without Diaphragmatic Resection in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases

Background

Diaphragmatic resection (DR) is often required during cytoreductive surgery/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) to achieve complete cytoreduction (CC). While CC provides the best survival, requiring a DR may indicate unfavorable tumor biology. We assessed how DR during CRS/HIPEC affects outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a prospective single-center database from October 1994–May 2020. Peritoneal surface malignancy patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC with CC-0/1/2 were assigned to DR and NoDR groups. Survival was measured using the Kaplan–Meier method. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≥ 20 to eliminate confounding of more extensive disease in DR.

Results

Of 824 CRS/HIPECs, 774 were included: 134 DR and 640 NoDR. PCI was significantly higher in DR: 29 versus 21, p < 0.001. CC-0/1 rate was 89% in DR and 95% in NoDR (p = 0.003). Neither 100-day morbidity nor mortality differed between the groups (p = 0.355 and p = 1.000). Median follow-up was 64 months. Median overall survival (OS) was significantly lower in DR (32 vs. 96 months, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by tumor type in patients with PCI ≥ 20 showed significantly shorter OS in DR than NoDR in appendiceal (40 vs. 196 months, p < 0.001) and colorectal (14 vs. 23 months, p = 0.003), but not in ovarian tumors (32 vs. 42 months, p = 0.893), whereas median PCI did not differ among subgroups.

Conclusions

DR during CRS/HIPEC does not increase morbidity and mortality. It is associated with worse survival in appendiceal and colorectal tumors, even after adjusting for tumor burden but does not appear to impact ovarian cancer survival.

     

Hepatobiliary Procedures in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Background

The long-term prognosis of patients with peritoneal malignancies has greatly improved since the introduction of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Nevertheless, CRS can be associated with high postoperative morbidity. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the influence of hepatobiliary surgery as part of CRS on postoperative short-term patient outcome.

Methods

Between 2005 and 2008, a total of 63 (25%) of 252 patients with peritoneal surface malignancies undergoing CRS and HIPEC required hepatobiliary surgery. Liver resection was performed in 22, resection of Glisson capsule in 39, and bile duct resection in 2 patients. The mean age of the study population was 49.3 years. Thirty-four patients (54%) were women.

Results

Complete macroscopic cytoreduction (CC-0/1) was reached in 59 patients (93.7%). The median hospital stay was 18 days. Twenty-two patients developed minor complications (35%), such as moderate fever, pain, or secondary wound healing. In 21 patients (33%), severe complications occurred, most commonly pancreatitis and abdominal abscess. Three patients (4.8%) developed a biliary leakage. Of these, 2 had to be reoperated.

Conclusions

In our experience, hepatobiliary procedures have to be performed in up to one-third of patients and are associated with a low rate of specific complications, such as biliary leakages.