In-hospital mortality risk of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a comprehensive review of the US Medicare database from 2005 to 2010

Purpose

Intertrochanteric hip fracture is a common injury in the Medicare population. Very little is known about the in-hospital mortality risk of intertrochanteric hip fractures and associated demographics for the US Medicare population. The purpose of this study is to determine the in-hospital mortality rate of closed intertrochanteric hip fractures and to evaluate demographic factors influencing an increased mortality risk.

Methods

The PearlDiver Medicare database from 2005 to 2010 was queried for closed intertrochanteric hip fractures. Stratified sampling was conducted by creating subset for individuals with a death discharge from inpatient facilities. Statistical analysis was performed where appropriate.

Results

Throughout 2005–2010 there were a total of 1,138,142 intertrochanteric hip fractures. There were 19,385 deaths during the initial hospital stay, yielding a mortality rate of 1.70%. There was a 1.83% mortality rate for patients 75 and older and patients over the age of 84 comprised the majority of deaths at 58%. The mortality rate was lower for females (1.39%) than for males (2.56%) (p < 0.0002).

Conclusion

We found in the Medicare database that there is a relatively low rate of in-hospitality mortality associated with intertrochanteric hip fractures; this rate is lower than previously reported. We report a 1.70% in-hospital mortality using a complete Medicare dataset. Based on previous reporting for short term and one-year mortality risk, the present study suggests that mortality risk is greatest after patients have been released from the hospital. More attention should be paid to understanding and attenuating the mortality associated with intertrochanteric hip fractures after the acute hospital phase.

     

Safety and efficacy of a two-screw cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric femur fracture fixation: a retrospective case series in 264 patients

Introduction

Recent advances have led to the design of a new cephalomedullary nail, which aims to decrease the risk of failures in patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures by allowing for insertion of two interdigitating screws into the head segment. The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this two-screw cephalomedullary nailing system.

Patients/participants

Patients 18 years of age and older who underwent intramedullary nailing of their intertrochanteric femoral fracture using the InterTAN nailing system (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN) from 2012 to 2016 were included in this retrospective study which was performed at two urban certified level-1 trauma centers and one urban certified level-3 trauma center. The study data was collected through a retrospective chart review and review of the existing radiographic studies. Primary outcome measure was mechanical hardware failure and screw cutout. Secondary outcome measures included nonunion, malunion, medical and surgical complications.

Results

A total of 264 patients were included in this analysis. Two patients (0.75%) were found to have a screw cut out requiring revision surgery. Two other revision surgeries were performed for malrotation (n?=?1) and malunion (n?=?1). Other implant-related complications occurred in 19 cases (7.9%), which included broken distal screws (n?=?9), distal screw loosening (n?=?8), and loose lag screws (n?=?2). There was a total of 10 (3.8%) surgical wound complications, including four deep and six superficial infections.

Discussion

This modified cephalomedullary nail is a reliable, safe, and effective implant for management of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Surgical treatment of patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures can be performed in a safe fashion using this implant.

     

The Effect of Regional Analgesia on Vascular Tone in Hip Arthroplasty Patients

Background

While it is assumed that neuraxial analgesia and pain management may beneficially influence perioperative hemodynamics, few studies provided data quantifying such effects and none have assessed the potential contribution of the addition of a nerve block.

Questions/Purposes

This clinical trial compared the visual analog scale (VAS) scores and measurement of arterial tone using augmentation index of patients who received combined spinal–epidural (CSE) only to patients who received both CSE and lumbar plexus block.

Methods

After obtaining written consent, 92 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive either CSE or CSE with lumbar plexus block (LPB). Perioperative pain and arterial tone were measured using VAS scores and augmentation index (AI) respectively, at baseline and at various times postoperatively.

Results

After the exclusion of 2 patients, 44 patients received CSE alone and 46 patients received CSE and LPB. Patient demographics and perioperative characteristics were similar in both groups. AI continuously decreased after placement of a CSE with or without LBP, beyond full resolution of neuraxial and peripheral blockade. Although the LPB group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction of VAS pain scores in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU; P?<?0.05), overall, the addition of a LPB did not significantly reduce the AI when compared to the control group.

Conclusion

The addition of a LPB provided better pain control in the PACU but did not reduce the AI, compared to the control group. We conclude that the addition of a LPB may have limited ability to affect arterial tone in the presence of a continuous infusion of epidural analgesics. In summary, the addition of a LPB in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty is clinically effective and provided better pain control, especially in the immediate postoperative period. The continuous decrease on the AI in both groups beyond the full resolution of the neuroaxial and LPB will require further studies.

     

The Utility of Local Anesthesia for Neurosurgical Interventions in a Low-Resource Setting: A Case Series

Introduction

Trauma is a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality, and injury to the central nervous system is the most common cause of death in these patients. While the provision of surgical services is being recognized as essential to global public health efforts, specialty areas such as neurosurgery remain overlooked.

Method

This is a retrospective case review of patients with operable lesions, such as extra-axial hematomas and unstable depressed skull fractures that underwent neurosurgical interventions under local anesthesia.

Results

A total of 13 patients underwent neurosurgical intervention under local anesthesia. Two and three patients with burr hole decompression of epidural and subdural hematomas, respectively; seven patients had elevation of depressed skull fractures and lastly one patient had an aspiration of a brain abscess. All patients survived with and without residual neurological deficits.

Conclusion

Access to resources and staff required to deliver general anesthesia is challenging in resource-poor settings. We have therefore begun performing emergent interventions under local anesthesia, with or without conscious sedation. While some patients had some minor residual weakness after the procedure, the degree of neurological deficit was improved from that observed before the procedure in all patients.

     

Gelenkerhaltende Versorgung der medialen Schenkelhalsfraktur mit einem winkelstabilen Implantat

Objective

Operative stabilization is recommended even for non-displaced or only slightly displaced femoral neck fractures. In addition to the known osteosynthetic procedures, an angular stabile implant system (Targon® FN) has been established since 2006 for treatment of such fractures.

Indications

Displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden III and IV) and non-displaced fractures (Garden I and II).

Contraindications

Fractures close to the hip joint, which are not classified as typical medial femoral neck fractures and patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the hip who would profit from an endoprosthetic procedure.

Surgical technique

The operative procedure is shown after fracture reposition and central positioning of the guide wire as a standard course.

Postoperative Management

Early postoperative mobilization under guidance of a physiotherapist. Initially, partial weight bearing only in selected cases with severe displacement.

Results

In our patients collective the Targon® FN has been implanted in over 100 cases. Revision indications and secondary endoprosthesis were documented in only 9?% of the cases. This angular stable screw osteosynthesis system is a safe procedure to achieve patient mobility if the indications are adhered to and implantation is correctly carried out.

     

No difference in flexion power despite iliopsoas fatty degeneration in healed hip fractures with large lesser trochanter displacement

Objective

To evaluate iliopsoas atrophy and loss of function after displaced lesser trochanter fracture of the hip.

Design

Cohort study.

Setting

District hospital.

Patients

Twenty consecutive patients with pertrochanteric fracture and displacement of the lesser trochanter of?>?20 mm.

Intervention

Fracture fixation with either an intramedullary nail or a plate.

Outcome measurements

Clinical scores (Harris hip, WOMAC), hip flexion strength measurements, and magnetic resonance imaging findings.

Results

Compared with the contralateral non-operated side, the affected side showed no difference in hip flexion force in the supine upright neutral position and at 30° of flexion (205.4 N vs 221.7 N and 178.9 N vs. 192.1 N at 0° and 30° flexion, respectively). However, the affected side showed a significantly greater degree of fatty infiltration compared with the contralateral side (global fatty degeneration index 1.085 vs 0.784), predominantly within the psoas and iliacus muscles.

Conclusion

Severe displacement of the lesser trochanter (>?20 mm) in pertrochanteric fractures did not reduce hip flexion strength compared with the contralateral side. Displacement of the lesser trochanter in such cases can lead to fatty infiltration of the iliopsoas muscle unit. The amount of displacement of the lesser trochanter did not affect the degree of fatty infiltration.

Level of evidence

II.

     

Cemented hip hemiarthroplasty clinical observations on unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderlies

Objective

To observe the clinical effect of steel cable or greater trochanter reattachment (GTR) device combined with cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderlies.

Materials and methods

From July 2002 to June 2014, a total of 57 elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture, including 23 males and 34 females, were treated. Their ages ranged from 80 to 95 years, with the average of 83 years. According to Evans-Jensen classification, there were 18 type IIa cases, 13 type IIb cases and 26 type III cases. All patients received cemented bipolar femoral head replacement, using steel cable or GTR device to stabilize the unstable intertrochanteric fracture.

Results

All patients had successful operation procedure and were followed up for 36 months. Postoperative X-ray revealed satisfying postoperative position of artificial hip joint, without subsidence or loosening. Three cases with the use of steel cable alone to treat greater trochanter fracture suffered from rupture of steel cable. The patients using GTR device showed good reduction at the site of displaced greater trochanter fracture and a firm fixation. The clinical outcome measured with Harris hip score and Barthel Index at the time of final follow-up was significantly different between the groups.

Conclusion

Hip hemiarthroplasty for elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture can meet the load bearing requirement at early stage and reduce postoperative complications prominently. Moreover, GTR devices can effectively solve the instability problem of posterior-lateral side of hip caused by displacement of greater trochanter in unstable intertrochanteric fracture.

     

Clinical Management of Osteoporotic Fractures

Purpose of Review

This review examines recent literature regarding the clinical management of fragility fractures, provides insight into new practice patterns, and discusses controversies in current management.

Recent Findings

There are declining rates of osteoporosis management following initial fragility fracture. Management of osteoporotic fractures via a multidisciplinary team reduces secondary fracture incidence and improves overall osteoporotic care. Anabolic agents (abaloparatide and teriparatide) are effective adjuvants to fracture repair, and have shown positive results in cases of re-fracture in spite of medical management (i.e., bisphosphonates). For AO 31-A1 and A2 intertrochanteric hip fractures (non-reverse obliquity), no clinical advantage of intramedullary fixation over the sliding hip screw (SHS) has been proven; SHS is more cost-effective.

Summary

As fragility fracture incidence continues to rise, orthopedic surgeons must play a more central role in the care of osteoporotic patients. Initiation of pharmacologic intervention is key to preventing subsequent fragility fractures, and may play a supportive role in initial fracture healing. While the media bombards patients with complications of medical therapy (atypical femur fractures, osteonecrosis of jaw, myocardial infarction), providers need to understand and communicate the low incidence of these complications compared with consequences of not initiating medical therapy.

     

Trochanteric fragility fractures

Objective

Use of standardized cement augmentation of the proximal femur nail antirotation (PFNA) for the treatment of trochanteric fragility fractures, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality, to achieve safer conditions for immediate full weight-bearing and mobilization, thus, improving preservation of function and independency of orthogeriatric patients.

Indications

Trochanteric fragility fractures (type 31-A1–3).

Contraindications

Ipsilateral arthritis of the hip, leakage of contrast agent into the hip joint, femoral neck fractures.

Surgical technique

Reduction of the fracture on a fracture table if possible, or minimally invasive open reduction of the proximal femur, i.?e., using collinear forceps if necessary. Positioning of guidewires for adjustment of the PFNA and the spiral blade, respectively. Exclusion of leakage of contrast agent and subsequent injection of TRAUMACEM? V⁺ into the femoral head–neck fragment via a trauma needle kit introduced into the spiral blade. Dynamic or static locking of the PFNA at the diaphyseal level.

Postoperative management

Immediate mobilization of the patients with full weight-bearing and secondary prevention, such as osteoporosis management is necessary to avoid further fractures in the treatment of these patients.

Results

A total of 110 patients older than 65 years underwent the procedure. Of the 72 patients available for follow-up (average age 85.3 years), all fractures healed after an average of 15.3 months. No complications related with cement augmentation were observed. Approximately 60?% of patients achieved the mobility level prior to trauma.

     

Cementless total hip arthroplasty for patients previously treated with femoral osteotomy for hip dysplasia: the incidence of periprosthetic fracture

Purpose

Femur deformities can make stem fixation difficult in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We report the clinical results of cementless THA using a press-fit stem in patients who had previously undergone femoral osteotomy for hip dysplasia.

Methods

The subjects included 66 hips in 64 patients, with the mean follow-up period of 7.3 years. THA was performed at a mean period of 17.1 years after intertrochanteric femoral osteotomy. Valgus osteotomy was performed in 42 hips, and varus osteotomy in 24. Clinical results were evaluated by using the Merle d’Aubigne-Postel score. Implant survival was determined with revision as the end point, and any related complications were investigated.

Results

The Merle d’Aubigne-Postel score improved from 9.4 to 16.1 at the final follow-up, without any implant loosening. However, periprosthetic femoral fractures were observed in four hips (6.0 %), one intra-operatively and three within three weeks after THA. Among these cases, three hips previously had varus osteotomy (12.5 %) and one hip had valgus osteotomy (2.3 %). Two hips were revised with full porous stems and circumferential wiring. The five and ten year cumulative survivorship rates were 97 % (range, 88.8–99.3 %) and 97 % (88.8–99.3 %), respectively.

Conclusions

Although the use of a press-fit cementless stem yielded acceptable results in most of the patients, perioperative femoral fracture was a major complication especially in the patients previously treated with intertrochanteric varus osteotomy. Careful planning and implant selection could be emphasized for these cases.

     

Osteosynthese und Pfannenwechsel bei periprothetischer Azetabulumfraktur über einen Kocher-Langenbeck-Zugang

Objective

Reconstruction/stable fixation of the acetabular columns to create an adequate periacetabular requirement for the implantation of a revision cup.

Indications

Displaced/nondisplaced fractures with involvement of the posterior column. Resulting instability of the cup in an adequate bone stock situation.

Contraindications

Periprosthetic acetabulum fractures with inadequate bone stock. Extended periacetabular defects with loss of anchorage options. Isolated periprosthetic fractures of the anterior column. Septic loosening.

Surgical technique

Dorsal approach. Dislocation of hip. Mechanical testing of inlaying acetabular cup. With unstable cup situation explantation of the cup, fracture fixation of acetabulum with dorsal double plate osteosynthesis along the posterior column. Cup revision. Hip joint reposition.

Postoperative management

Early mobilization; partial weight bearing for 12 weeks. Thrombosis prophylaxis. Clinical and radiological follow-ups.

Results

Periprosthetic acetabular fracture in 17 patients with 9 fractures after primary total hip replacement (THR), 8 after revision THR. Fractures: 12 due to trauma, 5 spontaneously; 7 anterior column fractures, 5 transverse fractures, 4 posterior column fractures, 1 two column fracture after hemiendoprosthesis. 5 type 1 fractures and 12 type 2 fractures. Operatively treated cases (10/17) received 3 reinforcement ring, 2 pedestal cup, 1 standard revision cup, cup-1 cage construct, 1 ventral plate osteosynthesis, 1 dorsal plate osteosynthesis, and 1 dorsal plate osteosynthesis plus cup revision (10-month Harris Hip Score 78 points). Radiological follow-up for 10 patients: consolidation of fractures without dislocation and a fixed acetabular cup. No revision surgeries during follow-up; 2 hip dislocations, 1 transient sciatic nerve palsy.

     

Treatment of periprosthetic acetabular fractures after previous hemi- or total hip arthroplasty

Objective

Treatment of displaced periprosthetic acetabular fractures in elderly patients. The goal is to stabilize an acetabular fracture independent of the fracture pattern, by inserting the custom-made roof-reinforcement plate and starting early postoperative full weight-bearing mobilization.

Indications

Acetabular fracture with or without previous hemi- or total hip arthroplasty.

Contraindications

Non-displaced acetabular fractures.

Surgical technique

Watson-Jones approach to provide accessibility to the anterior and supraacetabular part of the iliac bone. Angle-stable positioning of the roof-reinforcement plate without any fracture reduction. Cementing a polyethylene cup into the metal plate and restoring prosthetic femoral components.

Postoperative management

Full weight-bearing mobilization within the first 10 days after surgery. In cases of two column fractures, partial weight-bearing is recommended.

Results

Of 7 patients with periprosthetic acetabular fracture, 5 were available for follow-up at 3, 6, 6, 15, and 24 months postoperatively. No complications were recognized and all fractures showed bony consolidation. Early postoperative mobilization was started within the first 10 days. All patients except one reached their preinjury mobility level. This individual and novel implant is custom made for displaced acetabular and periprosthetic fractures in patients with osteopenic bone. It provides a hopeful benefit due to early full weight-bearing mobilization within the first 10 days after surgery.

Limitations

In case of largely destroyed supraacetabular bone or two-column fractures according to Letournel additional synthesis via an anterior approach might be necessary. In these cases partial weight bearing is recommended.

     

Changes in the augmentation index and postoperative orthostatic intolerance in orthopedic surgery: a prospective cohort study

Background

Postoperative orthostatic intolerance (OI) can be a major obstacle to early ambulation and its determinants are poorly understood. We aimed to study postoperative changes in vascular tone and their potential association with OI in various orthopedic surgical settings.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, 350 patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty under neuraxial anesthesia or spine surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. We determined the augmentation index (AI) as a measure of vascular tone and studied symptoms of OI using a validated questionnaire at various postoperative time points.

Results

The AI was significantly reduced postoperatively (at spinal resolution in patients with neuraxial anesthesia or two hours postoperatively in general anesthesia) compared with baseline values in all procedures and did not subsequently return to baseline throughout the postoperative period in the majority of patients [252/335 (75.2%); P < 0.001]. The majority [260/342 (76.0%); P < 0.001] of patients had postoperative symptoms of OI. Nevertheless, no association was found between postoperative change in AI from baseline and postoperative symptoms of OI.

Conclusions

A significantly prolonged decrease in AI and symptoms of OI are common after orthopedic surgery. Nevertheless, an association between the two measures was not observed. While compensatory mechanisms may limit the influence of an AI decrease on symptoms of OI, more research is needed to understand the contributing factors and aid in the identification of patients at risk of OI.

     

Visit-to-visit variation of fasting plasma glucose is a predictor of hip fracture in older persons with type 2 diabetes: the Taiwan Diabetes Study

Summary

We investigated the association between fasting plasma glucose variability (FPG-CV) and the risk of hip fracture in elderly diabetic patients. Our finding showed a temporal association between FPG-CV and hip fracture as patients categorized as FPG-CV greater than 25.4 % showed an increased risk in hip fractures.

Introduction

Hip fracture is a major health burden in the population and is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity especially in elderly. It is evident that diabetes mellitus is a risk factor of osteoporosis which is a significant risk factor of hip fracture. However, epidemiological studies exploring the risks of hip fracture among type 2 diabetic patients are limited.

Methods

A retrospective study of 26,501 ethnic Chinese older persons enrolled in the National Diabetes Care Management program in Taiwan was conducted; related factors were analyzed with extended Cox proportional hazards regression models to competing risk data on hip fracture incidence.

Results

The results show a temporal association between FPG-CV and hip fracture as patients categorized as FPG-CV greater than 25.4 % showed an increased risk in hip fractures, confirming a linear relationship between the two. After multivariate adjustment, the risk of hip fracture increased among patients with FPG-CV of 25.4–42.3 % and >42.3 % compared with patients with FPG-CV of ≦ 14.3 % (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95 % confidence interval 1.14–1.60 and 1.27; 1.07–1.52, respectively). Significant linear trends among various FPG-CV were observed.

Conclusions

Thus, the present study demonstrated the importance of glucose stability for fracture prevention in older persons with type 2 diabetes. Future studies should be conducted to explore whether reduction in glucose oscillation in older adults with diabetes mellitus can reduce the risk of hip fracture.

     

Impact of hip fracture on hospital care costs: a population-based study

Summary

Using a large cohort of hip fracture patients, we estimated hospital costs to be £14,163 and £2139 in the first and second year following fracture, respectively. Second hip and non-hip fractures were major cost drivers. There is a strong economic incentive to identify cost-effective approaches for hip fracture prevention.

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to estimate hospital costs of hip fracture up to 2 years post-fracture and compare costs before and after the index fracture.

Methods

A cohort of patients aged over 60 years admitted with a hip fracture in a UK region between 2003 and 2013 were identified from hospital records and followed until death or administrative censoring. All hospital records were valued using 2012/2013 unit costs, and non-parametric censoring methods were used to adjust for censoring when estimating average annual costs. A generalised linear model examined the main predictors of hospital costs.

Results

A cohort of 33,152 patients with a hip fracture was identified (mean age 83 years (SD 8.2). The mean censor-adjusted 1- and 2-year hospital costs after index hip fracture were £14,163 (95 % confidence interval (CI) £14,008 to £14,317) and £16,302 (95 % CI £16,097 to £16,515), respectively. Index admission accounted for 61 % (£8613; 95 % CI £8565 to £8661) of total 1-year hospital costs which were £10,964 higher compared to the year pre-event (p?<?0.001). The main predictors of 1-year hospital costs were second hip fracture, other non-hip fragility fractures requiring hospitalisation and hip fracture-related complications. Total UK annual hospital costs associated with incident hip fractures were estimated at £1.1 billion.

Conclusions

Hospital costs following hip fracture are high and mostly occur in the first year after the index hip fracture. Experiencing a second hip fracture after the index fracture accounted for much of the increase in costs. There is a strong economic incentive to prioritise research funds towards identifying the best approaches to prevent both index and subsequent hip fractures.

     

Megaprosthetic reconstruction for periprosthetic or highly comminuted fractures of the hip and knee

Objectives

To present the experience of a tertiary referral hospital in the management of a case series with hip or knee fractures by using modular megaprosthesis.

Patients and methods

Seventeen consecutive patients with highly comminuted fractures of the knee (n = 2), periprosthetic fractures of knee (n = 10) or hip (n = 5) were included. Fractures were managed with modular megaprosthesis (including total hip in 2 cases). Postoperative complications like infection and instability and outcome measures like return to previous mobility and living were recorded.

Results

The mean age at time of surgery was 77 years (25–91), and mean follow-up was 44 months (13–98). We had no intra-operative complications. There were 3 deep periprosthetic infections, 1 hip and 2 knee. In the hip group, including total femur patients, we had 2 dislocations (2/7), both managed with closed reduction. No aseptic loosening was seen. 15/17 patients regained walking ability, and 16 were discharged to independent living. Nine patients have died at the time of follow-up.

Conclusions

In these often old and physically compromised patients with highly comminuted fractures or complicated periprosthetic fractures, modular megaprosthesis could be a good surgical option. It can provide immediate stability and allow early mobilization.

     

Incidence of and risk factors for femoral fractures in the gap between hip and knee implants

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyse the incidence of interprosthetic femoral fractures and describe risk factors for them.

Methods

Between 2009 and 2015, we selected patients who were carrying two implants (hip and knee) in the same femur. We collected demographic and clinical data and performed a radiological evaluation to analyse the gap between implants—the femoral canal area and total femoral area—in the axial plane. We defined interprosthetic fracture as that corresponding to a Vancouver type C fracture and types 1 and 2 according to the Su classification.

Results

We studied 68 patients who had total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and 44 patients who had total hip arthroplasty (THA); 24 patients an intramedullary nail. We found six interprosthetic fractures (8.8 %), all in patients with a non-cemented THA. There was a tendency towards statistical difference (p?=?0.08). Patients with an additional implant at the proximal femur were statistically less likely to have an interprosthetic fracture (p?=?0.04). In radiological results, we found more interprosthetic fractures in patients who had an increased femoral canal area in the axial plane just distal to the tip of the hip implant.

Conclusions

Identifying risk factors for this specific type of fracture may facilitate their prevention. Better implant stability and the presence of a gap between stems in a lower canal zone appear to hinder the occurrence of interprosthetic fractures.

     

Spontaneous Fractures of a Modern Modular Uncemented Femoral Stem

Background

Femoral stem fracture following total hip arthroplasty is an uncommon event that requires immediate revision surgery.

Questions/Purposes

We report on four patients who experienced stem fractures of one design and a review of the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reports on this design.

Methods

Fracture surfaces of four EMPERION? (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN) femoral stems were analyzed under optical and scanning electron microscopy. A search of the FDA’s Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) that reports on all EMPERION? adverse events was completed.

Results

Fracture surfaces exhibited characteristics consistent with a fatigue fracture mechanism. Sixteen MAUDE reports claimed stem fracture or breakage of EMPERION? stems.

Conclusion

The four cases of EMPERION? stem fractures were likely driven by small stem diameter, high offset, and high patient weight. Modular stem-sleeve femoral systems are susceptible to fatigue failure under high stress and should only be used in appropriate patients, whom are not considered obese.

     

Two injection digital block versus single subcutaneous palmar injection block for finger lacerations

Purpose

We aimed to compare two digital nerve block techniques in patients due to traumatic digital lacerations.

Methods

This was a randomized-controlled study designed prospectively in the emergency department of a university-based training and research hospital. Randomization was achieved by sealed envelopes. Half of the patients were randomised to traditional (two-injection) digital nerve block technique while single-injection digital nerve block technique was applied to the other half. Score of pain due to anesthetic infiltration and suturing, onset time of total anesthesia, need for an additional rescue injection were the parameters evaluated with both groups. Epinephrin added lidocaine hydrochloride preparation was used for the anesthetic application. Visual analog scale was used for the evaluation of pain scores. Outcomes were compared by using Mann–Whitney U test and Student t-test.

Results

Fifty emergency department patients ≥18 years requiring digital nerve block were enrolled in the study. Mean age of the patients was 33 (min–max: 19–86) and 39 (78 %) were male. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of our main parameters; anesthesia pain score, suturing pain score, onset time of total anesthesia and rescue injection need.

Conclusion

Single injection volar digital nerve block technique is a suitable alternative for digital anesthesias in emergency departments.

     

Micro-Finite Element Analysis of the Proximal Femur on the Basis of High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Images

Purpose of Review

Hip fractures have catastrophic consequences. The purpose of this article is to review recent developments in high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided finite element analysis (FEA) of the hip as a means to determine subject-specific bone strength.

Recent Findings

Despite the ability of DXA to predict hip fracture, the majority of fractures occur in patients who do not have BMD T scores less than ??2.5. Therefore, without other detection methods, these individuals go undetected and untreated. Of methods available to image the hip, MRI is currently the only one capable of depicting bone microstructure in vivo. Availability of microstructural MRI allows generation of patient-specific micro-finite element models that can be used to simulate real-life loading conditions and determine bone strength.

Summary

MRI-based FEA enables radiation-free approach to assess hip fracture strength. With further validation, this technique could become a potential clinical tool in managing hip fracture risk.