Enoxacin compared with vancomycin for the treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.

Enoxacin administered orally was compared with vancomycin administered intravenously for the treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. The MICs and MBCs of both enoxacin and vancomycin for an inoculum of 5.0 X 10(5) CFU of the methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain per ml were 1.56 microgram/ml. With an inoculum of 10(8) CFU/ml, enoxacin at 6 micrograms/ml and vancomycin at 180 micrograms/ml resulted in similar decreases in numbers of methicillin-resistant S. aureus in broth. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus endocarditis in rabbits was treated with enoxacin at 100 mg/kg orally every 12 h or vancomycin at 30 mg/kg intravenously every 12 h for 3 or 5 days. Enoxacin treatment for 3 or 5 days and vancomycin treatment for 5 days significantly reduced bacterial counts of vegetations compared with those in untreated control rabbits after 1 day of infection. Bacterial counts of vegetations after vancomycin treatment for 3 days did not differ significantly from those of untreated controls. Bacterial counts of vegetations in the four therapeutic groups did not differ significantly from one another. In uninfected rabbits single doses of vancomycin at 30 mg/kg administered intravenously achieved much higher concentrations in serum than did single doses of enoxacin at 100 mg/kg administered orally. Enoxacin had an elimination half-life in serum that was approximately 1.5 times longer than that of vancomycin. This study demonstrated that enoxacin administered orally is as effective as vancomycin administered intravenously for the treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant S. aureus endocarditis.     

Ciprofloxacin versus vancomycin in the therapy of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.

We compared the efficacy of ciprofloxacin with that of vancomycin by using the rabbit model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Endocarditis was treated with ciprofloxacin (25 mg/kg [body weight] intravenously every 8 h) or vancomycin (17.5 mg/kg intravenously every 6 h) for 3 days. Vancomycin and ciprofloxacin were equally efficacious in clearing bacteremia. Both reduced vegetation bacterial counts by 5 log10 CFU/g and renal and splenic bacterial counts by more than 3 log10 CFU/g as compared with untreated control rabbits after 26 h of infection (P less than 0.001). Both antimicrobial agents were able to eradicate the infectious process in an equivalent proportion of animals. No methicillin-resistant S. aureus that was recovered from ciprofloxacin-treated rabbits developed resistance to ciprofloxacin during therapy. Peak concentrations of ciprofloxacin in the sera of rabbits with endocarditis were significantly higher than those predicted by single-dose studies in uninfected rabbits. This finding was likely due to changes in the pharmacokinetics of the drug with multiple dosing and in infected versus uninfected rabbits. This study demonstrated that intravenously administered ciprofloxacin is as efficacious as vancomycin is in an in vivo model of a serious systemic methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection.     

Role of tolerance in treatment and prophylaxis of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis with vancomycin, teicoplanin, and daptomycin.

The role of Staphylococcus aureus tolerance in the treatment and prophylaxis of endocarditis in rats was investigated. The efficacies of vancomycin, teicoplanin, and daptomycin, alone and in combination with rifampin, were compared in rats with endocarditis infected with a tolerant strain of S. aureus and in rats with endocarditis infected with its nontolerant variant. In vitro the cloxacillin-tolerant strain was also tolerant to vancomycin and teicoplanin, but not to daptomycin. However, tolerance to these antibiotics did not influence the results of treatment of experimental S. aureus endocarditis. There was no difference in the bacterial densities in the vegetations of rats infected with either the tolerant or the nontolerant strain after 5 days of treatment with any of the antibiotic regimens. Of all antibiotics, daptomycin was the most effective in reducing bacterial numbers in vegetations. Combination of rifampin with vancomycin or teicoplanin improved the results of treatment for the tolerant as well as the nontolerant strains. Daptomycin was as effective alone as in combination with rifampin. In contrast, tolerance influenced the prophylactic effects of vancomycin and teicoplanin. The proportion of rats with sterile vegetations after prophylaxis with vancomycin or teicoplanin at a low dose was lower for those infected with the tolerant strain than for those infected with the nontolerant strain. A low dose of daptomycin was equally effective against the tolerant and the nontolerant strains. However, higher doses of all three antibiotics afforded almost full protection against both strains.     

Oral temafloxacin versus vancomycin for therapy of experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

We compared oral temafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone agent, with vancomycin, each with and without rifampin, in the therapy of rats with aortic valve endocarditis caused by a clinical isolate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The temafloxacin, vancomycin, and rifampin MICs and MBCs were 0.78 and 1.56, 1.56 and 3.13, and less than 0.024 and 0.78 microgram/ml, respectively. The animals were classified into the following six treatment groups: vancomycin (60 mg/kg) +/- rifampin (6 mg/kg) each intramuscularly every 12 h for 5 days; temafloxacin (100 mg/kg) orally +/- rifampin (6 mg/kg) intramuscularly every 12 h for 5 days; rifampin (6 mg/kg) intramuscularly every 12 h for 5 days; and untreated controls. All regimens with either vancomycin or temafloxacin resulted in improved survival over controls, but only temafloxacin regimens resulted in a significant reduction in bacterial counts in vegetations. These data support further investigation of the efficacy of temafloxacin in treating serious infections caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus.     

Clindamycin therapy of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.

The efficacy of clindamycin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis in rabbits was compared with that of nafcillin. Both drugs were administered intramuscularly three times daily for 5 days, clindamycin at doses of 6.25, 12.5, 25, or 50 mg/kg and nafcillin at a dose of 200 mg/kg. The minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations (0.125 microgram/ml) of clindamycin for the test strain of Staphylococcus aureus were very similar to the corresponding concentrations (0.25 microgram/ml) of nafcillin. The effectiveness of clindamycin against the experimental endocarditis was dose dependent. The therapeutic accomplishments of the two highest clindamycin doses were equivalent to those attained with 200 mg of nafcillin per kg. The rates of sterilization of vegetations were equal when the serum bactericidal titers of these drugs were greater than or equal to 1:8. In special situations the administration of clindamycin in high doses could prove useful in the treatment of S. aureus endocarditis.     

Influence of reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides on activities of vancomycin and teicoplanin against Staphylococcus aureus in experimental endocarditis

The influence of reduced susceptibilities to glycopeptides on the activities of vancomycin and teicoplanin against an isogenic pair of clinical Staphylococcus aureus strains in experimental endocarditis was investigated. While vancomycin was similarly active against both strains, teicoplanin was approximately 100-fold less active against the resistant strain and selected for the emergence of more resistant subpopulations.     

Fusidic acid alone or in combination with vancomycin for therapy of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

The usefulness of fusidic acid, alone or combined with vancomycin, was investigated for the therapy of experimental endocarditis caused in rabbits by a methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus. In vitro killing curves showed an indifferent interaction between the two antibiotics. In vivo, vancomycin alone was as effective as a vancomycin-fusidic acid combination (P < 0.05 versus control animals). No resistance to fusidic acid emerged during combination therapy. Fusidic acid alone was not effective. Resistance emerged in 5 of 12 animals treated with fusidic acid alone and was responsible for antibacterial failure. Fusidic acid alone was effective (P < 0.001) and did not select resistant strains if therapy was started when animals retained a smaller inoculum. We concluded that the vancomycin-fusidic acid combination exhibited no advantage over vancomycin alone in this model.     

Minocycline versus vancomycin for treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

The purpose of this study was to determine the penetration of minocycline and vancomycin into cardiac vegetations and to determine their efficacy in a rabbit model of endocarditis caused by oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Animals were randomized into three groups: control (no antibiotic), minocycline (6 mg/kg given intravenously every 8 h), and vancomycin (50 mg/kg given intravenously every 8 h). Penetration of the antibiotics into aortic valve vegetations was determined by using the tissue/serum area under the concentration-time curve ratio. The reductions in the bacterial density of the vegetations caused by both vancomycin (4.8 +/- 1.2 CFU/g) and minocycline (5.3 +/- 1.6 CFU/g) were significantly different from that of controls (8.7 +/- 1.8 CFU/g). Although the penetration of minocycline was twice that of vancomycin, they were equally effective in reducing the bacterial density of the vegetations, since the concentrations of both agents in tissue remained above their MICs for oxacillin-resistant S. aureus. For organisms for which the MICs are higher, however, these penetration differences may result in treatment differences.     

In vitro activity of teicoplanin compared with vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus derived from cystic fibrosis sputum.

We evaluated the in vitro activity of teicoplanin compared with vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) derived from cystic fibrosis (CF) sputum. Teicoplanin had a slightly lower median minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for these strains (0.25 micrograms/ml) than did vancomycin (0.5 micrograms/ml). Inoculum size increased the MICs similarly for both drugs, and pH variations did not significantly affect their activity. The presence of serum and sputum in the growth media decreased the activity of both drugs, although this was more pronounced for teicoplanin which is highly protein bound. We conclude that teicoplanin has activity against this pathogen and might be evaluated in clinical protocols designed to address this emerging clinical problem.     

Comparative activity of cloxacillin and vancomycin against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus experimental endocarditis

OBJECTIVES: To compare the activity of cloxacillin and vancomycin against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and to determine how rapidly their bactericidal activity occurs in cardiac vegetations. METHODS: In vitro and in vivo studies using an experimental model of endocarditis in rabbits. Animals were treated for 1, 2 or 3 days with cloxacillin 200 mg/kg intramuscularly three times a day or vancomycin 25 mg/kg intravenously twice a day. RESULTS: Cloxacillin and vancomycin at concentrations 4- and 16-fold the MIC produced a modest decrease in the number of microorganisms at 4 h. After 24 h, cloxacillin produced a decrease in the counts of staphylococci from 2.19 to 4.84 log10 cfu/mL of inoculum. Only concentrations of vancomycin from 16- to 32-fold the MIC resulted in equivalent decreases. After 24 h of treatment, both antibiotics were equally effective in preventing mortality of rabbits. Cloxacillin produced a greater decrease in the number of staphylococci than vancomycin (3.50+/-2.18 log10 cfu/g vegetation and 6.25+/-1.28 log10 cfu/g vegetation, respectively; P<0.05) and 41% of rabbits had sterile vegetations in comparison with none with vancomycin (P=0.035). After 48 and 72 h of treatment, both antimicrobials exhibited equivalent activity. CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin was less rapidly bactericidal than cloxacillin in vivo.     

Successful therapy of experimental endocarditis caused by vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a combination of vancomycin and beta-lactam antibiotics

VRS1 is the first isolated strain of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) found to carry the vanA gene complex previously described in Enterococcus. Under vancomycin pressure, VRS1 makes aberrant cell walls consisting of stem tetrapeptide and depsipeptide that lack the terminal D-Ala-D-Ala residues targeted by vancomycin. Previous data have suggested that this aberrant cell wall is not cross-linked by PBP2a, the enzyme responsible for cell wall transpeptidation in the presence of beta-lactam antibiotics. We examined the efficacy of treating VRS1 with a combination of vancomycin and beta-lactam antibiotics in vitro and in vivo. We found that the MIC of oxacillin for VRS1 decreased from >256 microg/ml to <1 microg/ml in the presence of vancomycin. Using the rabbit model of endocarditis, we treated VRS1-infected rabbits with nafcillin alone, vancomycin alone, or a combination of nafcillin and vancomycin. Treatment with nafcillin in combination with vancomycin cleared bloodstream infections within 24 h and sterilized 12/13 spleens (92%), as well as 8/13 kidneys (62%), following 3 days of treatment. Mean aortic valve vegetation counts were reduced 3.48 log(10) CFU/g with the combination therapy (compared to untreated controls) and were significantly lower than with either vancomycin or nafcillin given alone. VRS1 was extremely virulent in this model, as no untreated rabbits survived the 3-day trial. Treatment of clinical infections due to VRSA with the combination of vancomycin and beta-lactams may be an option, based on these results.     

Daptomycin is more efficacious than vancomycin against a methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in experimental meningitis

OBJECTIVES: To test the efficacy of daptomycin, a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic, against a methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strain in experimental rabbit meningitis and to determine its penetration into non-inflamed and inflamed meninges RESULTS: Over a treatment period of 8 h, daptomycin (15 mg/kg) was significantly superior to the comparator regimen vancomycin (-4.54 +/- 1.12 log(10)/mL for daptomycin versus -3.43 +/- 1.17 log(10)/mL for vancomycin). Daptomycin managed to sterilize 6 out of 10 CSFs compared with 4 out of 10 for vancomycin. The penetration of daptomycin into inflamed meninges was approximately 5% and approximately 2% into non-inflamed meninges. CONCLUSIONS: The superior bactericidal activity of daptomycin was confirmed in vivo and in time-killing assays in vitro.     

Vancomycin or vancomycin plus netilmicin for methicillin- and gentamicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus aortic valve experimental endocarditis.

Using a rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis, we studied the efficacy of vancomycin alone or in combination with netilmicin and/or rifampin against a methicillin- and gentamicin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus (MGRSA). Antibiotics were given for 6 to 12 days, as follows: vancomycin (15 mg/kg of body weight every 12 h [BID] intravenously), vancomycin plus netilmicin (2.5 mg/kg BID intramuscularly), vancomycin plus rifampin (10 mg/kg BID intramuscularly), and vancomycin plus netilmicin plus rifampin at the same routes, dosages, and schedules mentioned above. Netilmicin was given to two additional groups at a higher dosage (6 mg/kg every 24 h intramuscularly) alone or in combination with vancomycin (15 mg/kg BID intravenously) for 12 days. All regimens resulted in undetectable bacterial counts in a significant proportion of vegetations (except netilmicin alone) or reduced the bacterial counts in the vegetations compared with the counts in the untreated controls (P<0.01 to P<0.001). No resistance to rifampin or netilmicin developed during therapy. It is concluded that in the treatment of experimental aortic valve endocarditis caused by MGRSA (i) vancomycin as monotherapy is as efficacious as the triple combination, (ii) the addition of netilmicin (once daily or BID) to vancomycin does not improve the efficacy of the latter antibiotic, even in the presence of rifampin, and (iii) a 12-day course in more effective than a 6-day one, but not at a statistically significant level.     

Single- and combination-antibiotic therapy for experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

The efficacy of fosfomycin in combination with vancomycin or gentamicin was evaluated in experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. After 5 days of therapy, both combinations proved to be highly effective since all rabbits had sterile vegetations.     

Daptomycin is effective in treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant and glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus

Daptomycin is a lipopeptide antibiotic with potent in vitro activity against gram-positive cocci, including Staphylococcus aureus. This study evaluated the in vitro and in vivo efficacies of daptomycin against two clinical isolates: methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) 277 (vancomycin MIC, 2 microg/ml) and glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) ATCC 700788 (vancomycin MIC, 8 microg/ml). Time-kill experiments demonstrated that daptomycin was bactericidal in vitro against these two strains. The in vivo activity of daptomycin (6 mg/kg of body weight every 24 h) was evaluated by using a rabbit model of infective endocarditis and was compared with the activities of a high-dose (HD) vancomycin regimen (1 g intravenously every 6 h), the recommended dose (RD) of vancomycin regimen (1 g intravenously every 12 h) for 48 h, and no treatment (as a control). Daptomycin was significantly more effective than the vancomycin RD in reducing the density of bacteria in the vegetations for the MRSA strains (0 [interquartile range, 0 to 1.5] versus 2 [interquartile range, 0 to 5.6] log CFU/g vegetation; P = 0.02) and GISA strains (2 [interquartile range, 0 to 2] versus 6.6 [interquartile range, 2.0 to 6.9] log CFU/g vegetation; P < 0.01) studied. In addition, daptomycin sterilized more MRSA vegetations than the vancomycin RD (13/18 [72%] versus 7/20 [35%]; P = 0.02) and sterilized more GISA vegetations than either vancomycin regimen (12/19 [63%] versus 4/20 [20%]; P < 0.01). No statistically significant difference between the vancomycin HD and the vancomycin RD for MRSA treatment was noted. These results support the use of daptomycin for the treatment of aortic valve endocarditis caused by GISA and MRSA.     

In-vitro selection of resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to teicoplanin and vancomycin

Nineteen strains of Staphylococcus aureus (five penicillin-susceptible and methicillin-susceptible, four methicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant, and ten methicillin-resistant) were serially subcultured in broth media containing a subinhibitory concentration (half the MIC) of either teicoplanin or vancomycin. The MIC of the antibiotic was again measured after five passages in antibiotic-containing broth. The experiment was terminated after 25 passages. After passage fifteen strains exhibited an eight-fold or greater increase in MIC of teicoplanin. On the other hand, only two strains exhibited even an unstable four-fold increase in MIC of vancomycin.     

Daptomycin versus vancomycin treatment for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in a murine model

Daptomycin (LY 146032), a new lipopeptide antimicrobial agent with activity against gram-positive bacteria, was compared to vancomycin in the treatment of staphylococcal bacteremia in a murine model. Two hundred and ninety-nine mice were inoculated with 1 x 10(8) bacteria by the tail vein, and treatment was begun 3 days later. Two dosage regimens of each drug were used: 10 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg administered every 12 h for 14 days. A control group received no therapy. Survival was determined 31 days after inoculation. There was no significant difference in survival in any of the four treatment groups. The survival in all treatment groups was significantly greater than in the control group. Serum levels of daptomycin remained longer in the therapeutic range than serum levels of vancomycin. In the murine model of staphylococcal disease, daptomycin treatment was as effective as treatment with vancomycin.     

Failure of vancomycin continuous infusion against experimental endocarditis due to vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus

Continuous infusion of vancomycin was evaluated against experimental endocarditis due to heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) and VISA. Animals were infected with hVISA PC1 (vancomycin MIC, 2 mg/liter) or VISA PC3 (vancomycin MIC, 8 mg/liter) and treated for 5 days with constant serum levels of 20 or 40 mg/liter. Vancomycin continuous infusion was unsuccessful, as 20 mg/liter was barely active against PC1 (6 of 13 sterile vegetations) and 40 mg/liter failed against PC3 (2 of 9 sterile vegetations).     

Daptomycin treatment of Staphylococcus aureus experimental chronic osteomyelitis

BACKGROUND: Infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is increasingly common in nosocomial and community settings. Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide anti-infective with activity against MRSA, approved for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections. Daptomycin may be useful in systemic or local treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. METHODS: We measured mechanical strength of daptomycin- and vancomycin-loaded polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), assayed in vivo release of daptomycin and vancomycin from daptomycin- and vancomycin-loaded PMMA, respectively, and compared the efficacy of two systemic doses of daptomycin with that of vancomycin, each with or without the respective anti-infective loaded into PMMA, using a rat model of MRSA chronic osteomyelitis. RESULTS: Neither tensile nor compressive strength of PMMA was impacted by impregnation with these antimicrobials at a concentration of 7.5% by weight. The peak concentrations of daptomycin and vancomycin in rat tibial bone surrounding a 7.5% daptomycin- and vancomycin-loaded 3 mm PMMA bead were 178 and 49 mg/L, respectively. In the treatment of experimental osteomyelitis, rats assigned to no treatment, daptomycin 50 mg/kg subcutaneously twice daily, daptomycin 60 mg/kg subcutaneously twice daily, and vancomycin 50 mg/kg intraperitoneally twice daily had 6.4, 4.1, 4.0 and 4.5 median log10 cfu/g of bone at the end of 21 days of therapy. All systemic anti-infectives studied were more active than was no treatment. Daptomycin- or vancomycin-loaded PMMA did not, however, exhibit microbiological efficacy alone or adjunctively, as assessed 21 days after implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin is released from PMMA in vivo at a rate similar to that of vancomycin. Systemic daptomycin is as active as vancomycin in a rat model of chronic MRSA experimental osteomyelitis.     

Activities of dalbavancin in vitro and in a rabbit model of experimental endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus with or without reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and teicoplanin

For the treatment of rabbit endocarditis, dalbavancin given once daily (10 mg/kg of body weight for 4 days) or as a single 40-mg/kg dose was active against Staphylococcus aureus with or without reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides, as expected from its good in vitro activity, even in broth supplemented with 90% serum and given its prolonged elimination half-life.