Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy with sperm cryopreservation for future assisted reproduction

BACKGROUND: Although obstructive azoospermia is treatable with microscopic seminal reconstruction, the number of patients who choose to undergo vasoepididymostomy is limited because of recent advances in assisted reproductive technology (ART). We attempted to define the outcome of surgical reconstruction in patients with suspected epididymal obstruction and no previous history of vasectomy. METHODS: We described 40 eligible end-to-side vasoepididymostomy procedures performed on 24 azoospermic patients who had either bilateral or unilateral epididymal obstruction. RESULTS: The overall patency rate following surgery was 54% (13/24) and for four patients (17%), natural intercourse resulted in pregnancy. Two pregnancies were initiated with intracytoplasmic sperm injections using frozen sperm collected during vasoepididymostomy. CONCLUSIONS: In the era of modern ART, microsurgical vasoepididymostomy with cryopreservation of sperm collected during the operation is recommended for patients with epididymal obstructions.     

Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study in a rat model

PURPOSE: Microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy remain technically challenging procedures. Refinements in technique have continually improved patency and pregnancy rates for the 2 procedures in experienced hands. Advances in surgical robotics produced the Da Vinci robot (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, California) with motion reduction and no tremor, features that may improve outcomes in microsurgery. We report a randomized prospective study of vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy using the Da Vinci robot in rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 24 adult male Wistar rats underwent vasectomy through a midline abdominal incision. Two weeks later the animals were randomized to microsurgical multilayer vasovasostomy, longitudinal vasoepididymostomy or robotic vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy groups. Outcomes measured included surgical time, complications, patency and sperm granuloma formation at 9 weeks. RESULTS: Animals were sacrificed 9 weeks after microsurgery. There were no significant differences in complications among the groups. Robotic vasovasostomy was significantly faster than the conventional microsurgical technique (68.5 vs 102.5 minutes, p = 0.002). The robotic and microsurgical vasoepididymostomy groups did not differ significantly in time. Patency rates were 100% for the robotic vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy groups, and 90% in the microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy groups. These differences were not significant. Sperm granulomas were found in 70% of microsurgical vasovasostomy anastomoses and 27% of robotic vasovasostomy anastomoses (p = 0.001). No significant difference in the sperm granuloma rate was found between the robotic or microsurgical vasoepididymostomy groups (42% and 50%, respectively, p = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge we report the first randomized prospective study using the Da Vinci robot for microsurgery. We believe that the improved stability and motion reduction during microsurgical suturing with the robot helped achieve excellent patency rates for vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy. The robot may also allow experienced microsurgeons to perform microsurgical procedures in patients at remote locations where no experienced microsurgeons are available.     

Prospective analysis of outcomes after microsurgical intussusception vasoepididymostomy

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively analyse the outcomes of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy using the intussusception technique, as vasoepididymostomy is considered the most challenging reconstructive microsurgery in urology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2003, of 324 men with obstructive azoospermia who had undergone microsurgical reconstruction of the reproductive tracts, 68 (21%) had intussusception vasoepididymostomy bilaterally or unilaterally in a functionally solitary testis. The outcomes of these patients were analysed prospectively. RESULTS: The mean age was 39.8 years for the men and 31.8 years for their partners. The causes of obstruction were after vasectomy in 31%, infection in 22%, iatrogenic in 19%, trauma in 1.5%, and idiopathic in 27%. The median duration of obstruction was 18.8 years; 37% of patients had had previous failed attempts at reconstruction. The mean (range) follow-up was 15.2 (1-36) months. The overall patency (>10 000 sperm/mL) rate was 84% (53/63). Patency was achieved in 60% (38/63) of men at 1 month after surgery. The mean best sperm count was 12.8 (0.01-80) x 10(6)/mL, with a 21 (0-30)% motility. Among patients with a follow-up of > 1 year, the natural paternity rate was 40%. The median time to achieve a natural pregnancy was 14.3 (3-30) months. Pregnancy was achieved with in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection in 31% of cases, all using fresh ejaculated sperm. CONCLUSIONS: A favourable patency and pregnancy rate can be achieved using microsurgical intussusception vasoepididymostomy. Even when assisted-reproductive technology is needed, fresh ejaculated sperm can be used without requiring a subsequent sperm retrieval procedure. Thus, microsurgical reconstruction of the reproductive tract should be primary therapeutic method in cases of azoospermia from epididymal obstruction.     

Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study of 3 intussusception techniques in rats

PURPOSE: Vasoepididymostomy is a technically challenging but cost-effective treatment for obstructive azoospermia. We evaluated the outcomes of 3 intussusception vasoepididymostomy techniques, namely 3 suture triangulation, 2 suture transverse and a new 2 suture longitudinal technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male Wistar rats were randomized into 4 experimental and 1 control groups. After 3 weeks of vasal obstruction bilateral vasoepididymostomy was performed. In group I, 3 sutures were placed in triangular fashion. In group II, 2 sutures were placed perpendicular to the tubule. In group III, 2 sutures were placed longitudinal to the tubule. The tubules were then opened in the direction of the needles and anastomosed to the vasa. After 5 months patency was evaluated in blinded fashion. RESULTS: The functional patency rate (presence of motile sperm in the vas) was 64%, 64% and 93% in groups I to III, respectively (p <0.001). As evaluated by methylene blue retrograde vasography toward the epididymis, the mechanical patency rate was similar for the 3 techniques, that is 86%, 86% and 93% in groups I to III, respectively. The sperm granuloma rate was significantly lower in group III (36%, 21% and 0% in groups I to III, respectively, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Transverse 2 suture vasoepididymostomy has a patency rate similar to that of the 3 suture technique. Our new 2 suture longitudinal technique, which allows a larger opening in the epididymal tubule for anastomosis, is superior to the 2 and 3 suture techniques with respect to the patency and sperm granuloma rates.     

Repeat vasectomy reversal after initial failure: overall results and predictors for success

PURPOSE: We review the treatment outcomes for microsurgical reconstruction following failed vasectomy reversal and identify predictors for success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our experience with microsurgical reconstruction in 41 men who underwent 1 or more prior unsuccessful vasectomy reversal procedures. Of these patients 20 underwent bilateral (16) or unilateral (4) vasoepididymostomy, 11 underwent bilateral (7) or unilateral (4) vasovasostomy and 10 underwent unilateral vasoepididymostomy with contralateral vasovasostomy. Postoperative followup consisted of serial semen analyses and telephone interviews. RESULTS: Patency and pregnancy followup data were available in 33 and 31 patients, respectively. Five couples had ongoing uncorrected female factor infertility problems and were not included in pregnancy rate calculations. Mean obstructive interval was 10.6 years. Overall patency and pregnancy rates were 79 and 31%, respectively. Mean total motile sperm count for patients demonstrating patency at followup was 38.0 million. History of conception with the current partner was predictive of future conception with 4 of 5 nonremarried couples (80%) initiating a pregnancy versus 3 of 18 remarried couples (17%) (p = 0.006). Other factors, including smoking history and obstructive interval, did not correlate with postoperative success. Reconstruction with vasovasostomy on at least 1 side trended toward improved patency (p = 0.17) and pregnancy rates (p = 0.15), although they did not assume statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical reconstruction following failed vasectomy reversal is associated with high patency and moderate pregnancy rates at short-term followup. In our series previous conception with the current partner was predictive of future conception after reconstruction. Urologists performing repeat vasectomy reversal must be familiar with microsurgical techniques, since almost three-quarters of patients will require at least unilateral vasoepididymostomy.     

Vasoepididymostomy for Vasectomy Reversal: A Critical Assessment in the Era of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection

Purpose

We compared vasoepididymostomy to microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection for treatment of epididymal obstruction secondary to vasectomy.

Materials and Methods

Results in patients who underwent vasoepididymostomy for vasectomy reversal at our institution were compared to those reported previously for microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection performed for obstructive azoospermia. The pregnancy rates, delivery rates, complications, cost per procedure and cost per delivery were compared. A cost per newborn analysis was performed using pregnancy and delivery rates, and reported cost estimates for the complications of assisted reproductive techniques.

Results

A total of 55 men underwent 58 vasoepididymostomies in an attempt to restore fertility after vasectomy. Median followup was 19 months (range 0 to 115). Median obstructive interval was 12 years. There were no major complications. The patency rate after 6 months was 85%. Of the couples 20 achieved 24 pregnancies and 16 had 17 live births. The pregnancy rate at 1 year was 44%. There were 4 miscarriages and there are 3 ongoing pregnancies. The live delivery rate was 36%. Assuming a 29% delivery rate for microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, the cost per newborn was $51,024, compared to $31,099 for vasoepididymostomy.

Conclusions

Vasoepididymostomy is more successful and more cost-effective than microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection for vasectomy reversal. It does not expose the women to complications in the treatment of a male problem and it is indicated for treatment of epididymal obstruction secondary to vasectomy. Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection should be reserved for cases not amenable to surgical reconstruction.     

The relationship between intravasal sperm quality and patency rates after vasovasostomy

PURPOSE: Most surgeons examine the intravasal fluid at vasectomy reversal. Vasovasostomy is performed when sperm are identified in the intravasal fluid or when sperm are absent but the fluid is copious and clear. When sperm are absent and the intravasal fluid is not copious and clear, vasoepididymostomy is often performed. Frequently the intravasal fluid contains only fragments of sperm. This study examines patency rates after microsurgical vasovasostomy as a function of the quality of sperm in the intravasal fluid. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of patients who had undergone microsurgical vasovasostomy were reviewed. The intravasal fluid was examined and sperm quality was recorded as no sperm, sperm heads, sperm with short tails or whole sperm. Results of postoperative semen analyses were recorded. Patency rates and postoperative semen parameters were compared. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients satisfied the entrance criteria. Ages ranged from 25 to 53 (mean age 39). Mean obstructive interval was 9.9 years (range 1 to 20). Overall patency was 98% (52 of 53 cases). Patency rates were 95% for the group with sperm heads and 100% for whole sperm, sperm with short tails and absent sperm groups. Patency rates did not vary significantly as a function of intravasal sperm quality. CONCLUSIONS: Modern microsurgical techniques yield excellent patency rates. The presence of sperm parts compared to whole sperm does not adversely affect patency rates after vasovasostomy. Vasovasostomy should be performed if any sperm parts are identified in the intravasal fluid.     

The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal

PURPOSE: We studied the impact of the interval from vasectomy to reversal and presence of sperm granuloma on outcomes of reversal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 213 microsurgical vasectomy reversals performed by a single surgeon were stratified according to obstructive intervals of less than 5 years, 5 to 10 years, 10 to 15 years and greater than 15 years. The effects of obstructive interval on patency and pregnancy rates were assessed using multivariate logistical regression. The impact of sperm granuloma on patency and pregnancy was assessed using the chi-square test. RESULTS: Patency did not change with increasing obstructive intervals as can be seen with 91% patency at less than 5 years, 88% at 5 to 10 years, 91% at 10 to 15 and 89% at greater than 15 years. There was no difference in pregnancy rates (89%, 82% or 86%) at obstructive intervals of 0 to 5, 5 to 10 or 10 to 15 years, respectively. Pregnancy rates were significantly lower (44%, p <0.05) with obstructive intervals greater than 15 years. Men with at least unilateral sperm granuloma had patency of 95% vs 78% without granulomas, a trend which did not quite reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). There was no difference in pregnancy rates with or without granulomas. CONCLUSIONS: Vasectomy reversal patency rates are high regardless of time since vasectomy. Pregnancy rates are lower more than 15 years after vasectomy. Sperm granuloma had a favorable impact on patency. Our data indicate that for obstructive intervals less than 15 years vasectomy reversal yields much higher pregnancy rates than in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and that even for intervals greater than 15 years reversal outcomes equal or exceed those of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.     

Toward a sutureless vasovasostomy: use of biomaterials and surgical sealants in a rodent vasovasostomy model

PURPOSE: With 500,000 to 800,000 vasectomies performed annually and a reversal rate of 3% to 8% vasectomy reversal has become a commonly performed procedure. Two-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy remains the gold standard for surgical reconstruction of the vas. However, this procedure is technically demanding and time-consuming. We determined the ability of biomaterials and surgical sealants to decrease the number of sutures used, enhance anastomosis watertightness and decrease operative time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult male Wistar rats underwent vasectomy 2 weeks prior to vasovasostomy. Standard 2-layer microsurgical repair was performed in control animals. Experimental groups underwent 3-suture mucosal approximation and then completion of the anastomosis with a biomaterial membrane and/or synthetic sealant. The rats were sacrificed 9 weeks after vasovasostomy. Anastomotic patency was assessed functionally by the presence of motile sperm in the vas distal to the testes and anastomosis, and mechanically by methylene blue vasogram. The presence and size of sperm granulomas were also recorded. RESULTS: Microsurgical vasovasostomy required significantly less time when biomaterial (42.7 minutes) or sealant (40 minutes) was used compared to the standard sutured group (102.5 minutes, each p < 0.001). There was no difference in patency between the standard sutured and biomaterial groups (90% vs 92%). Patency was significantly lower in the sealant groups, that is 70% in the suture, biomaterial and sealant group, and 75% in the suture and sealant group. The biomaterial group had only 1 sperm granuloma in 12 procedures, which was significantly better than the 7 in the control group (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using a biomaterial wrap during vasovasostomy resulted in significantly decreased operative time and fewer sperm granulomas than in the control group. Sealants were not effective. Biomaterial wrap may support vasovasostomy and by decreasing leakage improve the outcome.     

Need for sperm retrieval and cryopreservation at vasectomy reversal

PURPOSE: Controversy exists on whether to obtain sperm for cryopreservation routinely at vasectomy reversal. With recent improvements in in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection, it is now possible to obtain a small amount of testicular tissue for cryopreservation in the event of reversal failure. However, to our knowledge no studies exist of who is most likely to benefit from this procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 84 consecutive vasectomy reversals performed by 1 surgeon (J. I. S.) between July 1996 and March 2000 with followup available for 77. We grouped cases by procedure as vasovasostomy, vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy with vasoepididymostomy as well as bilateral or unilateral. Sperm was retrieved at reversal in 15 of 46 vasovasostomy (none used), 11 of 18 vasoepididymostomy (3 used) and 13 of 20 vasovasostomy with vasoepididymostomy (none used) cases. RESULTS: The overall anastomotic patency rate after unilateral or bilateral vasovasostomy, unilateral vasovasostomy with contralateral vasoepididymostomy and unilateral or bilateral vasoepididymostomy was 96%, 83% and 57%, respectively. The natural pregnancy rate without in vitro fertilization was 57%, 50% and 14%, respectively. The most recent vasoepididymal anastomoses were performed by the Berger triangulation technique with a 78% patency and 25% pregnancy rate. Only 8% of men with banked sperm eventually used it for assisted reproductive techniques, in whom unilateral or bilateral vasoepididymostomy failed in all. CONCLUSIONS: We currently do not recommend routine sperm retrieval for cryopreservation in men who undergoing vasovasostomy. We encourage men who require bilateral vasoepididymostomy to bank sperm at reversal. In men who undergo vasovasostomy with vasoepididymostomy we base the decision on preoperative counseling and intraoperative findings.     

Robotic assisted versus pure microsurgical vasectomy reversal: technique and prospective database control trial

Microsurgical vasectomy reversal is a technically demanding procedure. Previous studies have shown the possible benefit of robotic assistance during such procedures. Our goal was to compare robotic assisted vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy to standard microsurgical vasovasostomy (MVV) and vasoepididymostomy (MVE). The use of robotic assistance for vasectomy reversal may provide the microsurgeon with improved visualization, elimination of tremor, and decreased fatigue and obviate the need for a skilled microsurgical assistant. This study provides the first clinical prospective control trial of robotic assisted versus pure microsurgical vasectomy reversal. The use of robotic assistance in microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy may have benefit over MVV and MVE with regards to decreasing operative duration and improving the rate of recovery of postoperative total motile sperm counts based on our study.     

FERTILITY OUTCOME AFTER REPEAT VASOEPIDIDYMOSTOMY

PURPOSE: Historically, epididymal obstruction has been treated with surgical reconstruction. We determine whether it is worthwhile for patients to undergo repeat surgical reconstruction after failed vasoepididymostomy or whether they should be advised only to undergo sperm acquisition for assisted reproductive technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 18 patients underwent repeat vasoepididymostomy performed by a single urologist (A. J. T.). Cases were divided based on the etiology of obstruction into groups 1--prior vasectomy (4), 2--congenital (7) and 3--inflammatory (7). Data were available regarding time of obstruction between initial and repeat vasoepididymostomy, quality of epididymal fluid, levels of anastomoses, semen analyses at least 12 months after surgery for all 18 men and pregnancy rates based on more than 18 months of followup in 12. RESULTS: Mean patient age at repeat vasoepididymostomy was 40.6 years (50.5, 36 and 39.4 years for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively). Mean interval between vasectomy and initial vasoepididymostomy was 12.3 years (range 10 to 18). Mean interval between initial and repeat vasoepididymostomy was 19 months (range 12 to 41). Of the patients 10 underwent unilateral and 8 bilateral anastomoses, for a total of 26 repeat anastomoses. Overall patency rate was 66.7% (12 of 18) with sperm in the ejaculate in 75, 85 and 43% of patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The patency rates according to the levels of the anastomosis were 66.7, 62.5 and 100% in the caput, corpus and cauda, respectively. Natural conception occurred in 3 of 12 couples (25%, 2 caput and 1 caudal anastomosis) during a mean followup of 23 months (range 13 to 34). All 3 cases had congenital obstruction. Pregnancy was achieved in 2 group 1 cases with cryopreserved sperm extracted at repeat vasoepididymostomy, and in 1 case each in groups 1 and 2 with microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. CONCLUSIONS: After repeat vasoepididymostomy two-thirds of men have sperm in the semen. Natural conception occurred in 25% of patients (3 of 12) followed for more than 18 months. Inability to establish pregnancy in the remaining 7 of 9 patients with sperm in the semen with a followup longer than 18 months may be due to epididymal dysfunction or partial obstruction and subsequent poor sperm quality. Aspiration of motile sperm and cryopreservation were possible in 11 of 18 cases at repeat vasoepididymostomy and should be recommended in case azoospermia remains or occurs after surgery. It appears worthwhile to offer patients repeat vasoepididymostomy after a failed initial procedure.     

Laser-assisted vasectomy reversal: experience in 32 patients

A Food and Drug Administration approved protocol using a microsurgical carbon dioxide laser to assist in vasectomy reversal was instituted in January 1987. Between January 1987 and December 1988 the procedure was performed on 32 patients, 31 of whom submitted sperm and were available to evaluate. Success rates for sperm in the ejaculate in patients who underwent vasectomy less than 10 years previously were excellent, approaching 95%. The pregnancy rate in this group was 35%. In patients whose vasectomy was performed more than 10 years before reversal the results were much poorer. The success rate for sperm in the ejaculate was only 36% and the pregnancy rate was only 9%. The advantage of laser-assisted vasectomy reversal is that it is a simpler technical procedure that requires considerably less time than a 2-layer microsurgical technique. There were no significant complications, sperm granuloma, or even significant swelling or hematoma in any patient operated upon. Laser-assisted vasectomy reversal is at least equal to conventional microsurgical techniques and definitely easier to perform surgically.     

Laser-assisted vasal anastomosis in the rat and man

In order to study the efficacy of laser-assisted vasal anastomosis (LAVA), a microscopic carbon dioxide surgical laser (Xanar) was utilized in the anastomoses of human vas deferens in vitro and the Sprague-Dawley rat vas deferens in vivo. The longitudinal tensile and internal hydrostatic pressure strengths of laser-assisted vasal anastomoses were compared to conventional microsurgical suture anastomoses in the human vas deferens. The LAVA group had a greater mean internal hydrostatic pressure strength (p less than 0.001) and a lesser mean longitudinal tensile strength (p less than 0.001) than the conventional microsurgical group. Further evaluation was performed in the Sprague-Dawley rat model, comparing post-operative fertility, patency, healing and sperm granuloma occurrence among four surgically treated groups and a control group: LAVA, conventional suture anastomosis, sham operated, and vasectomized. Light and scanning electron microscopic examination revealed equivalent healing in both the LAVA and conventional groups. Fertility was not statistically different in the LAVA, conventional, control, and sham operated groups. However, the incidence of gross sperm granulomas observed in the LAVA group (80%) was much higher than in the conventional suture anastomosis group (0%). In conclusion, laser-assisted vasal anastomosis is a fast and simple technique for vasal reanastomosis and was as successful (in pregnancies) as conventional suture anastomosis in producing fertility in rats undergoing vasal reanastomosis, but the incidence of sperm granuloma is higher.     

Outcome and late failures compared in 4 techniques of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy in 153 consecutive men

PURPOSE: Vasoepididymostomy remains one of the most technically challenging procedures in all of microsurgery. The technique has evolved from an end-to-end, to an end-to-side technique, then to intussusception end-to-side methods. We recently reported the superiority of 2-suture longitudinal and 3-suture triangulation intussusception techniques in rats. In the present study we report our results in humans. We evaluated all vasoepididymostomies performed by 1 surgeon from January 1992 until the present for patency, pregnancy and for disappearance of sperm after initial return of sperm to the ejaculate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recorded the results of 153 consecutive vasoepdidymostomies done by 1 surgeon (MG) from January 1992 until February 2004. Four techniques were used, namely end-to-end (EE), end-to-side (ES), 3-suture triangulation intussusception (TIVE) and 2-suture longitudinal intussusception (LIVE). Data collected included technique, months of followup, sperm density, motility and morphology (WHO 1992 criteria), pregnancy outcome and late failures. Late failures were defined as having return of sperm to the ejaculate after vasoepididymostomy and then becoming azoospermic on at least 2 subsequent semen analyses. RESULTS: A total of 153 men underwent bilateral vasoepididymostomies. The most recent 17 were LIVE, preceeded by 38 TIVE, 32 ES and 66 EE. Mean followup for the groups were 17.2 (LIVE), 70.8 (TIVE), 116.7 (ES) and 140.2 (EE) months, respectively. Intact sperm were seen in the ejaculates of 12 men (80%) in the LIVE group, 16 in the TIVE group (84%), 20 in the ES group (74%) and 30 men in the EE group (73%). Motile sperm were found in the ejaculates of 10 of 15 (67%) in the LIVE group, 13 of 19 (68%) in the TIVE group, 10 of 27 (37%) in the ES group and 20 of 41 (49%) in the EE group (p =0.2). Mean times for return of sperm to the ejaculate were 2.9, 2.8, 2.8 and 3.5 months, respectively. Pregnancies were reported by 4 men in the LIVE group all before 12 months, 6 in the TIVE group and 3 were by 12 months, and 4 each by the ES and EE groups with 3 and 2 by 12 months (p =0.07). Thus far, there have been no late failures in the LIVE group, only 1 in the TIVE group (8%), 5 in the ES group (50%) and 6 in the EE group (30%) (p =0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Although vasoepididymostomy remains a technically demanding microsurgical procedure, recent technical innovations of TIVE and LIVE offer better or comparable outcomes compared with EE and ES procedures with the use of fewer sutures, which simplifies the performance of the anastomosis. In addition, the late failure rate is lower with the use of the intussusception techniques (LIVE and TIVE) with only 1 late failure in 22 men with return of sperm to the ejaculate procedures (4%) compared with 11 of 30 (37%) in the nonintussusception groups (p =0.006).     

Further clinical experience with CO2 laser in microsurgical vasovasostomy

Herein are reported the results obtained in 14 patients with the performance of vasovasostomy by carbon dioxide (CO2) laser. Fusion coagulation of the vas wall was successfully accomplished as demonstrated by postoperative sperm counts of over 20 million/mL in 86 per cent of the patients, and a pregnancy rate of 43 per cent in the group of patients operated on within less than ten years of original vasectomy. In contrast, those patients undergoing vasovasostomy ten years after original vasectomy had sperm counts of over 20 million/mL in 43 per cent of the cases, with a zero pregnancy rate. A significant reduction in total operative time was achieved as compared to the conventional microsurgical suture technique, corroborating the ability of the CO2 laser to simplify this technique while producing a sperm-tight anastomosis. One of the drawbacks of this operation is that it is not suited for the performance of a vasoepididymostomy which could be required in those cases in which sperm is absent from the vas fluid at the time of vasovasostomy.     

Clinical observation of loupe-assisted intussusception vasoepididymostomy in the treatment of obstructive azoospermia (analysis of 49 case reports)

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of loupe-assisted intussusception vasoepididymostomy (VE) in the treatment of epididymal obstructive azoospermia (EOA), we retrospectively analyzed data from 49 patients with EOA who underwent two-suture longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy (LIVE) between 2000 and 2007. The data included the surgical method, postoperative motile sperm count per ejaculation, percentage of progressive motile sperm and patency and pregnancy outcomes. There were a total of 49 men undergoing scrotal exploration, and epididymal obstruction was found in all cases. Bilateral or unilateral anastomoses were performed in 40 and 6 men, respectively. The postoperative courses of 42 patients were followed up for more than 6 months, and the courses of 38 patients were followed up for more than 1 year. The overall patency and pregnancy rates were 71.4% and 26.3%, respectively. Moreover, progressive motile sperm was more frequently present in those patients who had undergone anastomosis at cauda than at corpus or caput. Pregnancy was achieved only in those patients who had undergone anastomosis at least on one side of the cauda epididymis. We think that the loupe-assisted method, with a lower overall cost and a simplified surgical procedure, can achieve satisfactory patency outcomes and pregnancy results. Data from this paper also suggest that paternity outcomes occur more frequently after anastomoses at cauda than at corpus or caput.     

Microsurgical vasovasostomy after failed vasovasostomy

PURPOSE: We analyzed our experience with repeat microsurgical vasovasostomy after failed vasovasostomy and elucidate the possible predictors of surgical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 62 repeat vasectomy reversal cases with followup data available. Regardless of the intraoperative observation of sperm in the vasal fluid bilateral microsurgical 2-layer vasovasostomy was performed when surgically possible. Of these 62 patients 60 (97%) underwent bilateral (58) or unilateral (2) vasovasostomy and 2 (3%) underwent unilateral vasovasostomy with contralateral epididymovasostomy. RESULTS: Patency and pregnancy followup data were available on 62 and 42 patients, respectively. The overall patency and pregnancy rates achieved were 92% and 57%, respectively, and the natural birth rate was 52%. Increased age of the wife proved a negative prognostic factor for pregnancy (p = 0.018). The intraoperative detection of sperm and other factors, including obstructive interval, reconstruction type, anastomotic site, patient age and postoperative semen parameters, did not influence the surgical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the detection of sperm in the intravasal fluid during the operation repeat microsurgical vasovasostomy resulted in a better outcome than in other studies, in which adopted epididymovasostomy was done when sperm was absent from the vas fluid. Our study suggests that compromised anastomosis after previous surgery is the most common cause of failed vasovasostomy. We recommend that microsurgical vasovasostomy should be performed preferentially in failed vasovasostomy cases.     

A modified single-armed technique for microsurgical vasoepididymostomy

This study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a modified single-armed suture technique for microsurgical vasoepididymostomy (VE) in patients with epididymal obstructive azoospermia. From September 2011 to December 2011, microsurgical two-suture longitudinal intussusception VEs were performed using our modified single-armed suture technique in 17 men with epididymal obstructive azoospermia at our hospital. Two of these patients underwent repeated VEs after previous failed VEs, and one patient underwent unilateral VE because of an occlusion of the left abdominal vas deferens. The presence of sperm in the semen sample at 3 months postoperation was used as the preliminary endpoint of this study. Each patient provided at least one semen sample at the 3-month time point, and the patency was assessed by the reappearance of sperm (>10⁴ ml⁻¹) in the semen. The mean operative time for the modified technique was 219 min. Patency was noted in 10 men (58.8%), including one patient who underwent repeated VE. The patient who underwent unilateral anastomosis manifested no sperm postoperatively in his semen. Sperm granulomas were not detected in this cohort. The results of this study demonstrate that our modified technique for microsurgical longitudinal intussusception VE is effective. We believe that it is a practical alternative that may reduce operation time and obviate the suture crossing.     

Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group

During a 9-year period 1,469 men who underwent microsurgical vasectomy reversal procedures were studied at 5 institutions. Of 1,247 men who had first-time procedures sperm were present in the semen in 865 of 1,012 men (86%) who had postoperative semen analyses, and pregnancy occurred in 421 of 810 couples (52%) for whom information regarding conception was available. Rates of patency (return of sperm to the semen) and pregnancy varied depending on the interval from the vasectomy until its reversal. If the interval had been less than 3 years patency was 97% and pregnancy 76%, 3 to 8 years 88% and 53%, 9 to 14 years 79% and 44% and 15 years or more 71% and 30%. The patency and pregnancy rates were no better after 2-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy than after modified 1-layer microsurgical procedures and they were statistically the same for all patients regardless of the surgeon. When sperm were absent from the intraoperative vas fluid bilaterally and the patient underwent bilateral vasovasostomy rather than vasoepididymostomy, patency occurred in 50 of 83 patients (60%) and pregnancy in 20 of 65 couples (31%). Neither presence nor absence of a sperm granuloma at the vasectomy site nor type of anesthesia affected results. Repeat microsurgical reversal procedures were less successful. A total of 222 repeat operations produced patency in 150 of 199 patients (75%) who had semen analyses and pregnancy was reported in 52 of 120 couples (43%).